Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 38 references

Ascorbic acid mitigates oxidative structural degradation in bovine spermatozoa: a label-free quantitative phase microscopy study

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Label-free phase microscopy detects oxidative sperm damage and quantifies vitamin C rescue.

desk verdict A methodologically clean QPM demo undermined by an absurd H2O2 dose that makes the 'oxidative stress' interpretation untenable. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29428 v1 pith:K7V3QQ5C submitted 2026-07-31 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Harpreet Kaur , Shubham Tiwari , Aman Kumar , Sandeep Kumar Jha , Satish Kumar Dubey , Dalip Singh Mehta This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords quantitativephasemicroscopyoxidativestressascorbicacidbovinespermatozoalabel-freeimagingtransport-of-intensityequationdrymassassistedreproduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a label-free quantitative phase microscopy pipeline, built from just two brightfield images per cell, can detect oxidative stress-induced structural damage in bovine sperm heads and can measure a dose-dependent protective effect of ascorbic acid. In the authors' hands, hydrogen peroxide stress significantly reduces sperm-head optical thickness, dry mass, volume, and surface area, and alters texture parameters; co-treatment with 8 mg/ml ascorbic acid yields partial but statistically significant structural preservation, while 1 mg/ml shows no consistent rescue. If correct, this gives assisted-reproduction labs a fast, stain-free way to score sperm structural integrity and to screen antioxidant supplements. The central object is the reconstructed phase map, converted through simple identities into morphological and textural metrics.

What carries the argument

Transport-of-intensity equation (TIE) phase retrieval: two brightfield intensity images, one in focus and one defocused by 2 µm, are used to reconstruct the quantitative phase map via a universal TIE solver. From the phase map, optical thickness is φλ/2π; volume is the integral of optical thickness; dry mass is the phase integral divided by a specific refractive increment (α ≈ 0.18 mL/g); surface area uses the Monge parameterization of the thickness gradient; sphericity follows from volume and surface area; and six texture parameters (mean, SD, skewness, kurtosis, energy, entropy) are computed from the optical thickness distribution. The method's work is to turn label-free transmitted light

What would settle it

Image sperm exposed to a low, micromolar H2O2 dose (closer to pathological ROS levels) or to a non-oxidative membrane-disrupting agent (e.g., detergent) under the same QPM pipeline: if the same parameter drop appears without oxidation, or if the drop disappears at physiological doses, the oxidative-specificity claim fails. As a functional check, count live/dead status in the 8 mg/ml ascorbic acid group: if viability is not improved relative to the H2O2-only group, the structural preservation is cosmetic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under acute H2O2 stress (about 114 mM in the assay), the sperm head loses optical thickness and dry mass, shrinks in volume and surface area, and shifts toward a more uniform internal phase distribution (higher textural energy). Supplementing with 8 mg/ml ascorbic acid at the same time as the oxidant significantly attenuates these changes across optical thickness, volume, dry mass, surface area, sphericity, and surface-to-volume ratio, though values do not fully return to control. The 1 mg/ml dose produces no significant rescue. The authors interpret the QPM-derived biophysical parameters as label-free structural indicators of oxidative degradation and antioxidant recovery.

Load-bearing premise

The premise that the massive hydrogen peroxide dose (about 114 mM final) creates a physiologically relevant oxidative stress rather than nonspecific cell destruction, and that the measured structural changes therefore reflect the same lipid-peroxidation and protein-leakage pathways alleged in real ART oxidative stress.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sperm-head dry mass and optical thickness can serve as objective, quantitative endpoints for oxidative damage in andrology.
  • A fast two-image QPM protocol can run on a standard brightfield microscope, making structural sperm assessment feasible outside specialized labs.
  • Ascorbic acid rescue is dose-dependent and parameter-specific; the absence of an effect at 1 mg/ml marks a concentration threshold below which supplementation is unlikely to preserve structure.
  • Texture energy emerged as the most discriminant label-free marker of oxidative stress, potentially useful for automated sperm quality screening.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The H2O2 dose is roughly 100–1000× higher than typical sperm oxidative-stress models, so the 8 vs 1 mg/ml contrast may reflect scavenging of a large oxidant bolus rather than a dose-response relevant to ART; a lower-dose titration could change the interpretation.
  • Because ascorbic acid was added simultaneously with the oxidant, the protective effect could be extracellular chemical neutralization rather than intracellular repair; separating pre- and post-exposure administration would clarify mechanism.
  • The absence of an ascorbic-acid-only control means osmolarity or pH differences in the 8 mg/ml solution could confound the 'protection'; adding such a control would test specificity.
  • If the QPM parameters prove sensitive at micromolar H2O2 levels on sperm from multiple bulls, the technique could serve as a live, label-free viability surrogate for embryo-relevant sperm selection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper applies Transport-of-Intensity Equation (TIE) based quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) to frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa, using two bright-field images (in-focus and +2 µm defocus) per cell to reconstruct phase maps. Four groups are compared: control, H2O2-induced oxidative stress, and two ascorbic-acid co-treatment groups (1 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL stock concentrations), with n=60 cells per group. The authors extract six biophysical parameters (optical thickness, optical volume, dry mass, surface area, sphericity, surface-area/volume ratio) and six texture parameters (mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, entropy, energy) from segmented sperm-head phase maps. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc tests shows significant reductions in most parameters under H2O2 and partial, statistically significant attenuation at 8 mg/mL ascorbic acid, but no significant effect at 1 mg/mL. The authors conclude that QPM-derived biophysical and texture parameters can detect dose-dependent structural preservation and may serve as a label-free tool for sperm assessment in ART contexts.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper demonstrates that a label-free, two-image QPM pipeline can quantify structural changes in sperm heads under a chemical challenge and distinguish between two antioxidant doses. The internal biophysical arithmetic is consistent: dry mass computed as optical volume divided by α=0.18 mL/g reproduces the Table 2 values, and the morphology formulas are standard in the QPM literature. The TIE approach using only two defocused images is practical and the statistical comparisons are conventional. The paper is transparent about several limitations, including the absence of an ascorbic-acid-only control, lack of biochemical markers, and single-bull technical replication. However, the biological interpretation as 'oxidative stress' and 'antioxidant recovery' is weakened by the extremely high H2O2 concentration used and by the lack of biological replication; the contribution is therefore a proof-of-concept for label-free structural discrimination rather than a validated clinical or physiological model.

major comments (3)
  1. [Phase 1(b), Table 1, Discussion §2, Conclusion] The oxidative-stress model is load-bearing for the title and for the conclusion that ascorbic acid confers 'antioxidant recovery.' From Table 1, the 10 µL of ~30% w/v H2O2 in 770 µL gives a final concentration of approximately 114 mM, which is roughly 10^3× higher than the 50–200 µM typically used in sperm oxidative-stress studies. The Discussion states this 'high-stress scenario was intentionally designed to produce rapid, clear 3D structural collapse.' At 114 mM, H2O2 acts as a nonspecific denaturant/lytic agent, so the measured decreases in dry mass, volume, and optical thickness cannot be attributed specifically to lipid-peroxidation/protein-leakage pathways, and the ascorbic-acid effect may be stoichiometric scavenging of a massive oxidant bolus rather than a therapeutic dose-response. The conclusion's mechanistic and ART-relevance framing therefore overreaches. The authors should e
  2. [§3.1 and Limitations (Discussion §3)] The study uses a single Sahiwal bull and treats n=60 cells per group as technical replicates. The Limitations section acknowledges this, but the conclusion states that QPM parameters 'can detect dose-dependent differences in structural preservation following ascorbic acid co-treatment' as a general capability for bovine spermatozoa. Because all cells come from one ejaculate, the 240 observations are not biologically independent; the ANOVA p-values do not support claims about the general bovine population. This limitation should be elevated to an explicit qualifier in the abstract and conclusion, stating that the findings are derived from a single bull and require biological replication before the method is described as a general diagnostic tool.
  3. [Table 2 and Discussion §1 (texture parameters)] Table 2 lists 'Optical thickness (nm)' and a separate texture row labeled 'Mean' with values 62.61 nm vs. 47.0 for the control group, yet the text describes both as the mean optical thickness of the segmented sperm head. If the texture 'Mean' is computed on the same optical-thickness map, these values should be identical; the constant ratio of approximately 0.75 suggests that one of the two is not a physical mean but rather a normalized or gray-level mean. This needs clarification because the texture-parameter analysis and its biological interpretation ('mean optical thickness decreased under stress') depend on what exactly the 'Mean' row represents.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Figure 4 axis labels] The y-axis labels for volume and surface area read 'mm3' and 'mm2', but the text and Table 2 use µm3 and µm2. Please correct the units.
  2. [Phase 1(c) and Table 1] The text and Table 1 describe 1 mg/ml and 8 mg/ml ascorbic acid groups, but these are stock concentrations; the final assay concentrations are approximately 0.078 mg/mL and 0.62 mg/mL, respectively. Specify final concentrations explicitly to avoid misinterpretation of the dose-response claim.
  3. [Abstract and Discussion] Ascorbic acid is added simultaneously with H2O2 (co-treatment), not after damage induction. The term 'recovery' is used in the abstract and Discussion; 'protection' or 'attenuation' would be more accurate. 'Recovery' is also inconsistent with the title's 'mitigates' and the Methods description of immediate extracellular shielding.
  4. [Phase 1(b)] The statement that H2O2 'produces physiologically relevant ROS' is contradicted by the ~114 mM final concentration. Qualify this statement or remove it, since the dose is intentionally supraphysiological.
  5. [References] Reference [13] and the sentence citing [14] appear to be duplicated (the same phrase 'which constitutes a primary line of defense...' occurs twice), and the reference list contains inconsistent formatting and an incomplete entry [14]. Please check all references carefully.
  6. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states 'Scale bar is in radians' and then 'A scale bar corresponds to 10µm.' The colorbar scale is in radians, but the physical scale bar is in micrometers; rephrase to avoid confusion.
  7. [Abstract and Phase 2] The word 'high-throughput' is used in the abstract, but the workflow is manual sample preparation, manual cell selection, and processing of 60 cells per group. This is not high-throughput in the usual sense; consider a more modest description such as 'label-free' or 'semi-automated.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: QPM parameters are externally defined measurements, not fitted predictions; the paper's claims rest on direct observation and standard formulas.

full rationale

The paper's central inference—that H2O2 treatment reduces measured optical thickness, dry mass, volume, surface area, etc., and that 8 mg/ml ascorbic acid partially attenuates these reductions—is an empirical measurement claim, not a derived prediction. The biophysical quantities are defined by standard relations cited to external literature: optical thickness = λ/(2π)·Δφ, dry mass = (1/α)∫φ dxdy with α=0.18 mL/g, and surface area via the Monge parameterization [25,30,31]. No parameter is fit to the group labels or to the outcome; the ANOVA/Tukey comparisons are ordinary statistics applied to independently defined endpoints. The textural parameters are computed from the same phase map as the morphological ones, so they are correlated descriptors rather than independent evidence, but this is a statistical/interpretive caveat, not a definitional circularity: the paper does not use one parameter to predict another or define the biological outcome as the measured value. The self-citations ([24], [26]) supply methodological background and a published oxidative-stress imaging precedent; the H2O2/ascorbic-acid doses are stated explicitly in Table 1 and the model is not justified solely by the cited paper, so no load-bearing circularity arises from self-citation. Limitations acknowledged in Section 4—absence of biochemical oxidative-stress markers, single-bull technical replication, and the intentionally severe 'high-stress scenario'—concern biological validity and generalizability, not equation-level circularity. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no invented physical entities; its numbers are conventional QPM-derived quantities computed from measured phase maps. The load-bearing inputs imported from outside are: α=0.18 mL/g for dry-mass conversion; the TIE reconstruction assumptions; the interpretation that the H2O2 response is oxidative; the single-bull representativeness assumption; and the segmentation threshold choices. The free parameters are experimental choices (defocus step, ascorbic acid doses, unstated Tsallis threshold), none fitted to the outcome data.

free parameters (3)
  • Defocus step ±2 µm = ±2 µm
    Hand-chosen in Phase 3 to balance phase contrast versus paraxial validity; the axial intensity derivative and every reconstructed phase value depend on it.
  • Ascorbic acid stock doses and volumes = 1 mg/ml and 8 mg/ml stocks; 60 µL into 770 µL assay
    Chosen from literature [27,28], not fitted; final working concentrations (~0.078 and ~0.62 mg/ml) are never stated, so the 'dose-dependent' comparison is anchored to stock labels.
  • Tsallis entropy segmentation threshold = not stated
    The threshold controlling the sperm-head mask is not reported; all morphological and texture parameters inherit its choice.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Two-plane TIE with Δz=±2 µm reconstructs faithful phase maps (paraxial, small-defocus approximation)
    Phase 3; all subsequent parameters are integrals over the reconstructed phase; validity rests on the finite-difference approximation of the axial intensity derivative, with algorithm details in Supplementary File 1.
  • domain assumption Specific refractive increment α = 0.18 mL/g applies to bovine sperm head content
    Phase 4 dry-mass equation m = (1/α)∫φ dxdy cites [25]; dry mass, the paper's headline loss parameter, scales linearly with α; no measurement validates α for sperm chromatin.
  • domain assumption H2O2-induced structural change is specifically oxidative (lipid peroxidation, protein leakage, membrane disruption)
    Discussion attributes reduced optical thickness/dry mass to lipid peroxidation and protein loss, but no oxidative markers (e.g., MDA, ROS assays) were measured; at ≈114 mM final H2O2, non-specific oxidation may dominate. Related to weakest_assumption.
  • domain assumption Cells from one Sahiwal bull represent the bovine population for dose-response inference
    §3.1 uses n=60 cells/group from a single bull; Limitations: 'technical rather than biological replication... limits the validity of the findings.'
  • domain assumption Tsallis entropy thresholding yields a correct sperm-head segmentation
    Phase 4; all area- and integral-based parameters (volume, dry mass, surface area, sphericity, texture) depend on the segmented ROI; threshold value not reported; exclusion of cells with debris/artifacts is qualitative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ascorbic acid mitigates oxidative structural degradation in bovine spermatozoa: a label-free quantitative phase microscopy study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7V3QQ5C

@misc{pith2026260729428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ascorbic acid mitigates oxidative structural degradation in bovine spermatozoa: a label-free quantitative phase microscopy study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7V3QQ5C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29428}
}
read the original abstract

Oxidative stress is a key factor in low fertility outcomes during assisted reproduction technology (ART) and contributes to poor sperm quality. Conventional assessment relies on bright-field microscopy, which lacks the quantitative sensitivity to resolve subcellular structural and biophysical changes without exogenous contrast agents, a requirement that can introduce cytotoxic effects and compromise cell viability. This study uses QPM as a label-free, high-throughput method to demonstrate how ascorbic acid reduces the impact of oxidative structural degradation in Sahiwal bovine spermatozoa. To illustrate this pathology, severe oxidative stress was experimentally induced using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and two doses of ascorbic acid (1 mg/ml and 8 mg/ml) were tested to evaluate dose-dependent antioxidant recovery in structurally damaged sperm. QPM was used to quantify structural changes in key biophysical parameters, including dry mass, optical thickness, volume, surface area, sphericity, and surface area-to-volume ratio, as well as intracellular texture parameters. Under acute oxidative stress, bovine spermatozoa exhibited significant reductions in optical thickness and dry mass, alongside measurable changes in intracellular structural organization, collectively indicative of oxidative stress-induced morphological degradation. Co-treatment with ascorbic acid resulted in partial, dose-dependent structural preservation, with the 8 mg/ml formulation demonstrating statistically significant attenuation of these structural changes compared to the 1 mg/ml treatment group. These findings suggest that QPM-derived biophysical parameters may serve as promising, label-free structural indicators for characterizing oxidative damage in bovine spermatozoa. Future studies should incorporate functional validation to determine whether this structural preservation translates to improved outcomes in ART.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agarwal, G

    A. Agarwal, G. Virk, C. Ong, S.S. Du Plessis, Effect of Oxidative Stress on Male Reproduction, World J. Mens Health 32 (2014) 1. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2014.32.1.1

    work page doi:10.5534/wjmh.2014.32.1.1 2014

  2. [2]

    Ashibe, R

    S. Ashibe, R. Miyamoto, Y . Kato, Y . Nagao, Detrimental effects of oxidative stress in bovine oocytes during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), Theriogenology 133 (2019) 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.04.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.04.012 2019

  3. [3]

    Ribas-Maynou, M

    J. Ribas-Maynou, M. Yeste, A. Salas-Huetos, The Relationship between Sperm Oxidative Stress Alterations and IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Systematic Review from Nonhuman Mammals, Biology 9 (2020) 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9070178

    work page doi:10.3390/biology9070178 2020

  4. [4]

    Wilkinson, S

    J. Wilkinson, S. Bhattacharya, J. Duffy, M. Kamath, J. Marjoribanks, S. Repping, A. Vail, M. Van Wely, C. Farquhar, Reproductive medicine: still more ART than science?, BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 126 (2019) 138–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15409

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Unnikrishnan, J

    V . Unnikrishnan, J. Kastelic, J. Thundathil, Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Cattle, Genes 12 (2021) 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12020198

    work page doi:10.3390/genes12020198 2021

  6. [6]

    WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 6th ed, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2010

    2010

  7. [7]

    Ochsendorf, Infections in the male genital tract and reactive oxygen species, Hum

    F . Ochsendorf, Infections in the male genital tract and reactive oxygen species, Hum. Reprod. Update 5 (1999) 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/5.5.399

    work page doi:10.1093/humupd/5.5.399 1999

  8. [8]

    Chen, J.-P

    S. Chen, J.-P . Allam, Y . Duan, G. Haidl, Influence of reactive oxygen species on human sperm functions and fertilizing capacity including therapeutical approaches, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 288 (2013) 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2801-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2801-4 2013

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Pavuluri, Z

    H. Pavuluri, Z. Bakhtiary, M.K. Panner Selvam, W.J.G. Hellstrom, Oxidative Stress- Associated Male Infertility: Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches, Medicina (Mex.) 60 (2024) 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60061008

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Poulos, P

    A. Poulos, P . Sharp, D. Johnson, I. White, A. Fellenberg, The occurrence of polyenoic fatty acids with greater than 22 carbon atoms in mammalian spermatozoa, Biochem. J. 240 (1986) 891–895. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2400891

    1986 doi

  3. [11]

    J.H. Kang, H. Hakimov, A. Ruiz, R.M. Friendship, M. Buhr, S.P . Golovan, The negative effects of exogenous DNA binding on porcine spermatozoa are caused by removal of seminal fluid, Theriogenology 70 (2008) 1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.011

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    Agarwal, K.P

    A. Agarwal, K.P . Nallella, S.S. Allamaneni, T.M. Said, Role of antioxidants in treatment of male infertility: an overview of the literature, Reprod. Biomed. Online 8 (2004) 616–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61641-0

    2004 doi

  5. [13]

    Fraga, P .A

    C.G. Fraga, P .A. Motchnik, M.K. Shigenaga, H.J. Helbock, R.A. Jacob, B.N. Ames, Ascorbic acid protects against endogenous oxidative DNA damage in human sperm., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88 (1991) 11003–11006. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.24.11003

    1991 doi

  6. [14]

    Azawi, E.K

    O.I. Azawi, E.K. Hussein, Effect of vitamins C or E supplementation to Tris diluent on the semen quality of Awassi rams preserved at 5 ˚C, (n.d.)

  7. [15]

    Pehlivan, Vitamin C: An Antioxidant Agent, in: A.H

    F .E. Pehlivan, Vitamin C: An Antioxidant Agent, in: A.H. Hamza (Ed.), Vitam. C, InTech, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69660

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    E.T. Donnelly, The effect of ascorbate and alpha-tocopherol supplementation in vitro on DNA integrity and hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa, Mutagenesis 14 (1999) 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/14.5.505

    1999 doi

  9. [17]

    Donnelly, N

    E.T. Donnelly, N. McClure, S.E.M. Lewis, Antioxidant supplementation in vitro does not improve human sperm motility, Fertil. Steril. 72 (1999) 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00267-8

    1999 doi

  10. [18]

    Hamada, S.C

    A. Hamada, S.C. Esteves, A. Agarwal, Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele- associated male infertility: part 2, Nat. Rev. Urol. 10 (2013) 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.198

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    Ménézo, A

    Y .J. Ménézo, A. Hazout, G. Panteix, F . Robert, J. Rollet, P . Cohen-Bacrie, F . Chapuis, P . Clément, M. Benkhalifa, Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation: an unexpected adverse effect, Reprod. Biomed. Online 14 (2007) 418–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60887-5

    2007 doi

  12. [20]

    Dawson, W.A

    E.B. Dawson, W.A. Harris, M.C. Teter, L.C. Powell, Effect of ascorbic acid supplementation on the sperm quality of smokers, Fertil. Steril. 58 (1992) 1034–

    1992

  13. [21]

    Amann, D

    R.P . Amann, D. Waberski, Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): Capabilities and potential developments, Theriogenology 81 (2014) 5-17.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.004

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    Y . Wang, Y . Jia, M. Yuchi, M. Ding, The Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) Technique for Sperm Morphology Evaluation, in: 2011 Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Bio-Med. Instrum., IEEE, Wuhan, China, 2011: pp. 279–282. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBMI.2011.21

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Van Munster, Interferometry in flow to sort unstained X‐ and Y‐chromosome‐ bearing bull spermatozoa, Cytometry 47 (2002) 192–199

    E.B. Van Munster, Interferometry in flow to sort unstained X‐ and Y‐chromosome‐ bearing bull spermatozoa, Cytometry 47 (2002) 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10064

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    Mehta, A

    D.S. Mehta, A. Butola, V . Singh, Quantitative Phase Microscopy and Tomography: Techniques using partially spatially coherent monochromatic light, IOP Publishing,

  17. [25]

    Popescu, Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2011

    G. Popescu, Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Dubey, D

    V . Dubey, D. Popova, A. Ahmad, G. Acharya, P . Basnet, D.S. Mehta, B.S. Ahluwalia, Partially spatially coherent digital holographic microscopy and machine learning for quantitative analysis of human spermatozoa under oxidative stress condition, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 3564. https:...

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    O’Flaherty, M

    C. O’Flaherty, M. Beconi, N. Beorlegui, Effect of natural antioxidants, superoxide dismutase and hydrogen peroxide on capacitation of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa, Andrologia 29 (2009) 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439- 0272.1997.tb00481.x

    2009

  20. [28]

    Hu, W.-Q

    J.-H. Hu, W.-Q. Tian, X.-L. Zhao, L.-S. Zan, H. Wang, Q.-W. Li, Y .-P . Xin, The cryoprotective effects of ascorbic acid supplementation on bovine semen quality, Anim. Reprod. Sci. 121 (2010) 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.04.180

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    Zhang, Q

    J. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. Sun, L. Tian, C. Zuo, On a universal solution to the transport- of-intensity equation, Opt. Lett. 45 (2020) 3649. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.391823

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    Haifler, P

    M. Haifler, P . Girshovitz, G. Band, G. Dardikman, I. Madjar, N.T. Shaked, Interferometric phase microscopy for label-free morphological evaluation of sperm cells, Fertil. Steril. 104 (2015) 43-47.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.013

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    Girshovitz, N.T

    P . Girshovitz, N.T. Shaked, Generalized cell morphological parameters based on interferometric phase microscopy and their application to cell life cycle characterization, Biomed. Opt. Express 3 (2012) 1757. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001757

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    Shaked, Label-Free Quantitative Imaging of Sperm for In-Vitro Fertilization Using Interferometric Phase MicroscopyIVF , IMSI, ICSI, IPM, Holography, Imaging, Sperm, J

    N.T. Shaked, Label-Free Quantitative Imaging of Sperm for In-Vitro Fertilization Using Interferometric Phase MicroscopyIVF , IMSI, ICSI, IPM, Holography, Imaging, Sperm, J. Fertil. Vitro - IVF-Worldw. Reprod. Med. Genet. Stem Cell Biol. 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4...

    2016

  25. [33]

    Hungerford, H.W

    A.J. Hungerford, H.W. Bakos, R.J. Aitken, Addition of Ascorbic acid Mitigates the Loss of Antioxidant Capacity, Vitality and DNA Integrity in Cryopreserved Human Semen Samples, Antioxidants 13 (2024) 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13020247

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Fernandes, C.D

    G.S. Fernandes, C.D. Fernandez, K.E. Campos, D.C. Damasceno, J.A. Anselmo- Franci, W.D. Kempinas, Vitamin C partially attenuates male reproductive deficits in hyperglycemic rats, Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 9 (2011) 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-9-100

    2011 doi

  27. [35]

    Ibrahim, M.A

    N.A. Ibrahim, M.A. Buabeid, K.E. Elmorshedy, E.-S.A. Arafa, Cell protective effects of vitamin C against oxidative stress induced by ciprofloxacin on spermatogenesis: involvement of cellular apoptosis, Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 13 (2025) 1489959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.202...

    2025

  28. [36]

    Raspa, R

    M. Raspa, R. Paoletti, F . Scavizzi, Ascorbic acid 2‐glucoside improves survival, quality, and fertility of frozen‐thawed C57Bl/6J and C57Bl/6N mouse spermatozoa, Andrology 13 (2025) 1601–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13768

    2025 doi

  29. [1039]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55456-9

    doi

  30. [2022]

    https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-3987-2

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.