Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 28 references

Quantum computing-based solver for interacting power grids

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a quantum-classical hybrid solver that uses RVVQE to extract complex eigenvalues of a power grid's non-Hermitian admittance matrix, enabling resonance mode analysis with logarithmic memory.

desk verdict The core variational cost function cannot select eigenvectors of a non-Hermitian matrix; the 5-bus validation is unexplained. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29582 v1 pith:UTGZEENI submitted 2026-07-31 quant-ph

Ankit Kumar Das , Durgesh Pandey , P. Arumugam This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords resonancemodeanalysisnon-HermitianeigenvalueproblemvariationalquantumeigensolverRVVQEpowersystemstabilityharmonicquantum-classicalhybridlogarithmicmemoryscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that resonance mode analysis (RMA) of transmission grids — typically a memory-hungry diagonalization of large non-Hermitian matrices — can be performed on a quantum computer using only logarithmically many qubits. The authors propose mapping the admittance matrix Y_B,f = H_f + iK_f into Pauli operators and running the Real Variance-based Variational Quantum Eigensolver (RVVQE), which minimises the sum of variances of H_f and K_f to find a state that is a common eigenstate of both. They validate the routine on a padded 5-bus benchmark, reporting that the quantum-derived critical modal impedance |Z_cm| closely matches the classical eigen-solution over 100–3000 Hz. If the claim holds, engineers could analyse resonance instabilities in grids with tens of thousands of buses without storing the full matrix, since N = ⌈log2 n⌉ qubits suffice. The practical motivation is to make RMA scalable for continental-scale power networks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Real Variance-based Variational Quantum Eigensolver (RVVQE), a VQE-style algorithm for non-Hermitian operators. It splits the non-Hermitian admittance matrix into its Hermitian parts H and K, maps each to Pauli strings on N = ⌈log2 n⌉ qubits, and minimises the real cost C_var = Var(H) + Var(K). Zero variance is interpreted as meaning that the trial state is a simultaneous eigenvector of both H and K, so the complex eigenvalue is read out as ⟨H⟩ + i⟨K⟩. This variance-minimization step, together with the logarithmic qubit encoding, is what carries the argument from a non-Hermitian eigenproblem to a near-term quantum measurement.

What would settle it

Take a small non-normal admittance matrix (e.g., a 3×3 complex symmetric matrix) with known eigenvalues and non-commuting H and K. Run RVVQE with the same cost function: if the optimizer cannot drive C_var to zero and the recovered eigenvalues deviate from exact diagonalization beyond numerical tolerance, the central claim fails. A direct check is to compute the residual norm ||(Y − λ I)|ψ⟩|| for the obtained eigenpair on any test instance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the RVVQE algorithm reliably extracts the complex eigenvalues of the non-Hermitian admittance matrix that governs resonance mode analysis. For each frequency step, the algorithm writes Y_B,f = H_f + iK_f with Hermitian H_f and K_f, encodes these operators into N-qubit Pauli strings, and prepares a variational state |ψ(θ)⟩. The cost C_var(θ) = ⟨H_f²⟩ − ⟨H_f⟩² + ⟨K_f²⟩ − ⟨K_f⟩² is minimized; when it reaches zero the state is a simultaneous eigenstate of H_f and K_f, and the associated eigenvalue is λ = ⟨H_f⟩ + i⟨K_f⟩. Using a 3-qubit ansatz on a zero-padded 5×5 admittance matrix, the authors report that the critical resonance modal impedances obtained this way are in

Load-bearing premise

The entire method rests on the existence of a quantum state that is simultaneously an eigenvector of both Hermitian components H and K of the non-Hermitian admittance matrix; for a general non-normal matrix this simultaneous eigenvector does not exist, so the variance cost may never reach zero and the extracted 'eigenvalues' could be meaningless.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Resonance mode analysis of a 70,000-bus grid would need about 17 qubits, eliminating the classical O(n²) memory bottleneck for admittance matrices.
  • The same RVVQE workflow applies directly to larger IEEE test systems (118-bus, 300-bus) and to synthetic continental-scale grids such as those proposed as future benchmarks.
  • The reported agreement was obtained without quantum error mitigation; the paper argues that adding ZNE or PEC should further improve accuracy on physical hardware.
  • The extracted modal impedances plug directly into stability criteria such as the positive-mode-damping condition, so the quantum output is usable for harmonic mitigation and contingency assessment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The zero-variance objective implicitly requires H and K to have a common eigenvector; for a general non-normal admittance matrix this is not guaranteed, so the method's validity may be restricted to cases where H and K nearly commute or to matrices that are unitarily diagonalizable. The paper does not address this constraint.
  • The empirical validation uses a 5-bus system padded to 8×8, which is a very small non-normal matrix; scaling up may reveal that the variance landscape is rugged and that the classical optimizer struggles to reach global minima, a risk the paper does not quantify.
  • The same variance-based technique could be adapted to other non-Hermitian eigenvalue problems arising in open quantum systems (Lindbladians) or linear stability analysis, so the contribution may be a general template rather than a grid-specific solution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid quantum-classical framework for Resonance Mode Analysis (RMA) of power transmission grids. The non-Hermitian bus admittance matrix Y_B,f is decomposed into Hermitian parts H_f and K_f, and the Real Variance-based Variational Quantum Eigensolver (RVVQE) is used to minimize C_var = Var(H_f) + Var(K_f) as a proxy for finding eigenstates. The authors claim that this yields the complex eigenvalues of Y_B,f with a logarithmic number of qubits, and they validate the approach on a 5-bus system padded to 8×8, comparing the critical modal impedance |Z_cm| against exact classical diagonalization over 100 Hz to 3000 Hz.

Significance. The application of quantum eigensolvers to power-system resonance analysis is timely, and the authors are right that standard Hermitian VQE is inapplicable to non-Hermitian admittance matrices. The paper deserves credit for benchmarking against exact SciPy diagonalization rather than fitting to the target, and for clearly identifying the non-Hermitian challenge. However, the central algorithmic claim is not supported by the stated mathematics: the cost function in Eq. (7) vanishes only on simultaneous eigenstates of H_f and K_f, which generally do not coincide with the eigenstates of a non-normal Y_B,f. This is not a minor technical gap but a load-bearing flaw affecting Algorithm 1, the convergence criterion, and the interpretation of the reported numerical agreement. The scalability argument also omits the cost of Pauli decomposition and measurement. If the central claim were correct, the paper would be a valuable bridge between quantum algorithms and power-system stability, but in its present form the proposed method does not demonstrably compute the desired eigenvalues.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II-B, Eq. (7); Algorithm 1, steps 9–15] The deflation/orthogonality penalty described in §III is incompatible with non-Hermitian eigenproblems. Eigenvectors of a non-normal matrix are not mutually orthogonal in the Hilbert-space inner product ⟨·|·⟩. For a complex symmetric Y, the appropriate biorthogonality relation is v_i^T v_j = δ_ij after suitable scaling, not ⟨v_i|v_j⟩=0. Enforcing ⟨ψ_current|ψ_found⟩=0 as a penalty can move the optimizer away from true eigenvectors and generally prevents extraction of the full spectrum. Since the manuscript claims that the sequential deflation technique yields all eigenvalues, this is an independent correctness issue for Algorithm 1's stated output.
  2. [§III, 'To obtain all the eigenvalues...'] The deflation/orthogonality penalty described in §III is incompatible with non-Hermitian eigenproblems. Eigenvectors of a non-normal matrix are not mutually orthogonal in the Hilbert-space inner product ⟨·|·⟩. For a complex symmetric Y, the appropriate biorthogonality relation is v_i^T v_j = δ_ij after suitable scaling, not ⟨v_i|v_j⟩=0. Enforcing ⟨ψ_current|ψ_found⟩=0 as a penalty can move the optimizer away from true eigenvectors and generally prevents extraction of the full spectrum. Since the manuscript claims that the sequential deflation technique yields all eigenvalues, this is an independent correctness issue for Algorithm 1's stated output.
  3. [§II-B, Algorithm 1 step 7; §IV] The logarithmic-memory scalability claim is not established. The number of qubits N=⌈log2 n⌉ is logarithmic, but the Hermitian components H_f and K_f must be represented as sums of Pauli strings. For a dense n×n matrix this decomposition already has O(n²)=O(4^N) terms, and for sparse Y_B,f the number of Pauli terms and the associated measurement overhead are not analyzed. A logarithmic qubit count does not imply logarithmic total resources: the classical preprocessing, the number of circuit evaluations, and the memory needed to store the Pauli decomposition may reintroduce the scaling bottleneck the paper claims to bypass.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4] Typo: 'Qauntum Simulation' should be 'Quantum Simulation'.
  2. [References [23]] The central RVVQE algorithm is delegated to an unpublished, same-author preprint (ref. [23]) with no independent proof or implementation details. Algorithm 1 is a useful summary, but important choices—ansatz design, optimizer, deflation-penalty strength, zero-eigenvalue removal threshold, diagonal-shift amount—are only described verbally, which hampers reproducibility.
  3. [§III, zero-padding] Padding the 5×5 Ybus to 8×8 introduces artificial zero eigenvalues. The manuscript says an 'automatic validation routine removes zero eigenvalues,' but it does not explain how these are distinguished from physically meaningful near-zero resonance modes without biasing the extracted critical modes.
  4. [§II-A, Eq. (4)] The identity R_f = L_f^{-1} = L_f^T is not automatically true for every complex symmetric matrix; it requires a particular scaling of the eigenvectors. Please state the normalization or justify the equality, since it underlies the participation-factor formula in Eq. (5).
  5. [Fig. 4 and §III] The validation shows only the magnitude of the critical modal impedance |Z_cm|. No comparison of the full eigenvalue spectra, eigenvectors, or participation factors is reported, and no convergence history or final C_var values are given. Such data would be necessary to assess whether the quantum simulation actually converged to the intended eigenstates.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

RVVQE's validity is inherited from the authors' own unpublished preprint; the numerical benchmark is external, but the algorithm's core is self-cited.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section II-B (Quantum Embedding and the RVVQE Algorithm); Algorithm 1, lines 9-15; Section III]
    "To solve this, we apply a systematic formulation based on a Real Variance-based Variational Quantum Eigensolver (RVVQE) algorithm, which is specifically designed for non-Hermitian operators [23]."

    The central premise—that RVVQE extracts complex eigenvalues of non-Hermitian matrices—is not derived in this paper. It is imported from reference [23], an unpublished preprint by the same three authors (D. Pandey, A. K. Das, P. Arumugam). The cost function (Eq. 7) and the convergence criterion Cvar≈0 are the entire selection mechanism, but no proof is offered that zero-variance states are eigenvectors of a general non-normal Y. The 5-bus SciPy comparison checks the output values but does not independently establish the algorithm's theoretical validity; that validity rests on the self-citation.

full rationale

I find no step where a 'prediction' is literally fitted to the target by construction. The resonance modal impedances in Fig. 4 are compared against exact SciPy diagonalization, so the benchmark is external and the reported numbers are not obviously manufactured from the reference values. The principal load-bearing weakness is a self-citation chain: the RVVQE method and its cost function are taken from the authors' own unpublished preprint [23], with no derivation or proof of the simultaneous-eigenvector condition needed for Cvar=0 to correspond to eigenvalues of Y. That is a genuine self-citation that carries the algorithm's validity. The additional mathematical concern—that for a non-normal complex-symmetric Y, the Hermitian parts H and K need not commute, so exact eigenvectors of Y need not be zeros of Cvar—is a correctness risk rather than a circularity: it challenges whether the stated algorithm can produce the plotted agreement, but it does not make the output equal to the input by definition. Accordingly, the circularity score is 3.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The free parameters are all numerical hyperparameters controlling convergence and post-processing; none are fit to the classical eigenvalues, but their values are unspecified and affect the reported near-perfect match. The axioms include the load-bearing simultaneous-eigenstate assumption and reliance on an unverified self-cited algorithm.

free parameters (4)
  • Deflation penalty coefficient
    Used to enforce orthogonality to previously found eigenstates; value not specified; affects whether sequential eigenpairs converge (Sec. III).
  • Diagonal shift amount for closely spaced eigenvalues
    Small diagonal shift introduced automatically when eigenvalues are close; not specified; post-hoc adjustment of the problem matrix (Sec. III).
  • Zero-eigenvalue removal threshold
    Automatic validation routine removes zero and repeated eigenvalues; threshold not given; controls which modes are reported (Sec. III).
  • Grid-search initialization step over [0,2π]
    Initial parameters for the optimizer; step size not given; influences convergence to the global minimum (Sec. III).
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper There exists a state |ψ⟩ with Var(H)+Var(K)=0 for the non-Hermitian Y_B,f.
    Eq. (7) defines C_var as Var(H)+Var(K); zero requires a simultaneous eigenstate of H and K, which is not guaranteed for general non-Hermitian Y. The paper never proves this exists.
  • domain assumption RVVQE (ref [23]) correctly solves non-Hermitian eigenvalue problems as used in Algorithm 1.
    The central algorithm is cited to the same authors' preprint; no independent proof or implementation is supplied in this paper.
  • domain assumption The admittance matrix Y_B,f is complex symmetric with R_f = L_f^{-1} = L_f^T.
    Eq. (4) is standard for complex symmetric matrices with distinct eigenvalues; reasonable within the power-systems context.
  • standard math The Hermitian components H and K can be mapped to Pauli strings for the N-qubit system.
    Any Hermitian matrix on n qubits can be expanded in the Pauli basis; standard and uncontroversial.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum computing-based solver for interacting power grids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UTGZEENI

@misc{pith2026260729582,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum computing-based solver for interacting power grids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UTGZEENI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29582}
}
read the original abstract

The proliferation of power electronics in multi-terminal transmission grids has increasingly led to harmonic distortions and dynamic instabilities. While Resonance Mode Analysis (RMA) provides deep insights into these system resonances, evaluating the critical modes of large-scale grids presents a severe computational bottleneck. Classical iterative techniques must continuously diagonalize massively high-dimensional, non-Hermitian admittance matrices across a wide frequency spectrum, a process that rapidly exhausts classical memory and processing limits. To overcome this scaling barrier, we propose a novel quantum-classical hybrid methodology that natively maps the transmission grid's admittance matrix onto a Quantum Processing Unit (QPU). Because the grid's matrix is non-Hermitian, standard quantum eigensolvers are insufficient; thus, we employ the Real Variance-based Variational Quantum Eigensolver (RVVQE) algorithm to accurately extract the complex eigenvalues that represent the system's modes. Validated against a standard 5-bus transmission system, the quantum-derived critical-resonance modal impedances demonstrate near-perfect alignment with the exact classical frequency responses. Crucially, by encoding the grid's state logarithmically into quantum memory, this methodology bypasses classical RAM limitations. The successful implementation of the RVVQE framework not only bridges the mathematical topologies of dissipative electrical grids and open quantum systems but also provides a profoundly scalable architecture capable of diagnosing resonance instabilities in massive, continental-scale networks that currently exceed classical computational boundaries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29582 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the proposed hybrid quantum-classical framework for resonance mode analysis (RMA) of power transmission grids. The system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Workflow of the proposed hybrid quantum-classical (HQC) framework for resonance mode analysis. The non-Hermitian admittance matrix is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Three-qubit unitary rotation entangled ansatz with nearest-neighbor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Validation of the quantum algorithmic framework on the 5-bus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Renewable energy transmission by hvdc across the continent: system challenges and opportunities,

    J. Sun, M. Li, Z. Zhang, T. Xu, J. He, H. Wang, and G. Li, “Renewable energy transmission by hvdc across the continent: system challenges and opportunities,”CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 353–364, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8233581

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Modal frequency sensitivity for power system harmonic resonance analysis,

    Y . Cui and X. Wang, “Modal frequency sensitivity for power system harmonic resonance analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1010–1017, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6164298

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Computational time efficiency analysis for resonance studies in transmission grids and microgrid clusters,

    O. Cartiel, J.-J. Mesas, L. Monjo, and L. Sainz, “Computational time efficiency analysis for resonance studies in transmission grids and microgrid clusters,”Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 243, pp. 486–498, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475425005300

    2026

  4. [4]

    Harmonic resonance mode analysis,

    W. Xu, Z. Huang, Y . Cui, and H. Wang, “Harmonic resonance mode analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1182–1190, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/1413368

    arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Frequency-domain modal analysis of the oscillatory stability of power systems with high-penetration renewables,

    Y . Zhan, X. Xie, H. Liu, H. Liu, and Y . Li, “Frequency-domain modal analysis of the oscillatory stability of power systems with high-penetration renewables,”IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1534–1543, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8643991

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Application of modal sensitivity for power system harmonic resonance analysis,

    Z. Huang, Y . Cui, and W. Xu, “Application of modal sensitivity for power system harmonic resonance analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 222–231, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4077113

    arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    IEEE 14-bus system,

    “IEEE 14-bus system,” Electric Grid Test Case Repository, ac- cessed: Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://electricgrids.engr.tamu. edu/electric-grid-test-cases/ieee-14-bus-system/

    2026

  8. [8]

    IEEE 24-bus system,

    “IEEE 24-bus system,” Electric Grid Test Case Repository, ac- cessed: Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://electricgrids.engr.tamu. edu/electric-grid-test-cases/ieee-24-bus-system/

    2026

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    IEEE 118-bus system,

    “IEEE 118-bus system,” Electric Grid Test Case Repository, ac- cessed: Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://electricgrids.engr.tamu. edu/electric-grid-test-cases/ieee-118-bus-system/

    2026

  2. [10]

    IEEE 300-bus system,

    “IEEE 300-bus system,” Electric Grid Test Case Repository, ac- cessed: Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://electricgrids.engr.tamu. edu/electric-grid-test-cases/ieee-300-bus-system/. 6

    2026

  3. [11]

    Stability assessment for multi-infeed grid-connected vscs modeled in the admittance matrix form,

    L. Orellana, L. Sainz, E. Prieto-Araujo, and O. Gomis-Bellmunt, “Stability assessment for multi-infeed grid-connected vscs modeled in the admittance matrix form,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 3758–3771, 2021. [Online]. Availab...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Mechanism analysis of modal resonance in converter-based power systems,

    X. Zhou and S. Bu, “Mechanism analysis of modal resonance in converter-based power systems,”IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 3528–3542, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10833803

    2025

  5. [13]

    Bus participation factor analysis for harmonic instability in power electronics based power systems,

    E. Ebrahimzadeh, F. Blaabjerg, X. Wang, and C. L. Bak, “Bus participation factor analysis for harmonic instability in power electronics based power systems,”IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 10 341–10 351, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplor...

    2018

  6. [14]

    Saad,Numerical Methods for Large Eigenvalue Problems

    Y . Saad,Numerical Methods for Large Eigenvalue Problems. Philadelphia, PA, USA: SIAM, 2011. [Online]. Available: https: //epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9781611970739.bm

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan,Matrix computations (3rd ed.). USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996

    1996

  8. [16]

    A faster resonance mode analysis approach based on a modified shifted- inverse power iteration method,

    O. Cartiel, J. Jos ´e Mesas, L. Sainz, and A. Fabregas, “A faster resonance mode analysis approach based on a modified shifted- inverse power iteration method,”IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 4145–4156, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.iee...

    2023

  9. [17]

    An efficient implementation of the nonsymmetric lanczos algorithm,

    D. Day, “An efficient implementation of the nonsymmetric lanczos algorithm,”SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 566–589, 1997. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1137/S0895479895292503

    1997 doi

  10. [18]

    ACTIVSg70k: 70,000 bus synthetic grid on footprint of East- ern United States,

    “ACTIVSg70k: 70,000 bus synthetic grid on footprint of East- ern United States,” Electric Grid Test Case Repository, accessed: Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://electricgrids.engr.tamu.edu/ electric-grid-test-cases/activsg70k/

    2026

  11. [19]

    Simulating physics with computers,

    R. P. Feynman, “Simulating physics with computers,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 467–488, 1982. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

    1982 doi

  12. [20]

    Quantum random access memory,

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Quantum random access memory,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 100, p. 160501, Apr 2008. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.160501

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor,

    A. Peruzzo, J. R. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’brien, “A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor,”Nat. Commun., vol. 5, p. 4213,

  14. [22]

    Quantum simulation of nuclear hamiltonian with a generalized transformation for gray code encoding,

    P. Siwach and P. Arumugam, “Quantum simulation of nuclear hamiltonian with a generalized transformation for gray code encoding,” Phys. Rev. C, vol. 104, p. 034301, Sep 2021. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034301

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Real variance-based variational quantum eigensolver for non-hermitian matrices,

    D. Pandey, A. K. Das, and P. Arumugam, “Real variance-based variational quantum eigensolver for non-hermitian matrices,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28892

    2026

  16. [24]

    Quantum simulations of nuclear resonances with variational methods,

    A. Singh, P. Siwach, and P. Arumugam, “Quantum simulations of nuclear resonances with variational methods,”Phys. Rev. C, vol. 112, p. 024323, Aug 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/x8vx-y5mh

    2025

  17. [25]

    A rapid modal analysis method for harmonic resonance using modified power iteration,

    Z. Li, H. Hu, Y . Zhou, and Z. He, “A rapid modal analysis method for harmonic resonance using modified power iteration,”IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1495–1497, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7553550

    2018

  18. [26]

    Probabilistic harmonic resonance assessment considering power system uncertainties,

    Z. Li, H. Hu, Y . Wang, L. Tang, Z. He, and S. Gao, “Probabilistic harmonic resonance assessment considering power system uncertainties,”IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2989–2998, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8382332

    2018

  19. [27]

    Siso impedance-based stability analysis for system-level small-signal stability assessment of large-scale power electronics-dominated power systems,

    D. Yang and Y . Sun, “Siso impedance-based stability analysis for system-level small-signal stability assessment of large-scale power electronics-dominated power systems,”IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 537–550, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://i...

    2022

  20. [2014]

    Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5213

    [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5213

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.