Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 81 references

A spectroscopically confirmed galaxy at redshift 9.31 converts baryons into stars at 20–60% efficiency, three to four times above standard model predictions and in line with the feedback-free starburst scenario.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 03:58 UTC pith:B3RGQYCL

load-bearing objection First quantitative SFE for a spectroscopically confirmed z>9 galaxy, but the headline 20–60% range hinges on sample selection, halo mass function, and a possible uncorrected lensing magnification. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2607.29589 v1 pith:B3RGQYCL submitted 2026-07-31 astro-ph.GA

A Massive Galaxy at the Edge of Feedback-Free Efficiency

K. Aditya , Kartick C. Sarkar This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshift galaxiesstar formation efficiencyfeedback-free starburstbaryon conversion efficiencyabundance matchingcosmic dawnJWSTgalaxy formation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that a particular spectroscopically confirmed galaxy at redshift 9.31 converts baryons into stars at an efficiency of roughly 20–60% of its halo's baryon budget, well above the ~10% ceiling implied by standard galaxy-formation models and in line with the feedback-free starburst scenario. It then reads the galaxy's compact size, young age, low metallicity, high gas density, and halo mass as evidence that it satisfies the physical conditions required for feedback-free star formation. If the measurement holds, it would be the first direct evidence that some galaxies at cosmic dawn convert their gas into stars near the theoretical maximum, and it would strengthen the case that early massive galaxies can be explained within standard cosmology without invoking unusual star-formation physics. The result matters because it tests a specific quantitative prediction — that galaxies above a threshold halo mass at z≈9 should reach baryon conversion efficiencies of order 0.2–1 — with real observations rather than extrapolated models.

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the spectroscopically confirmed z=9.31 galaxy has log stellar mass 9.55 ± 0.08, effective radius 0.45 kpc, age ~160 Myr, metallicity ~0.2 solar, and cloud density ~3×10^3 cm^-3 — all matching FFB predictions. Rank-ordered abundance matching against 142 galaxies at z=9–10 (31 confirmed) assigns a halo mass of log(Mh/Msun)≈11, above the FFB threshold of 10.72, giving a baryon conversion efficiency of ε=0.20(+0.05/−0.06), or about 0.62 in a relaxed sample. That is three to four times standard model predictions and consistent with the duty-cycle-averaged FFB value. A detected 161 km/s interstellar outflow is read as feedback beginning to set in, so the galaxy sits at the ed

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is ε = M⋆/(fb Mh), the fraction of a dark halo's cosmic baryon budget that has become stars. To obtain Mh for a galaxy of given stellar mass, the paper uses rank-ordered abundance matching: it ranks galaxies by stellar mass and equates their cumulative number density with the cumulative number density of dark-matter halos in a standard analytic halo mass function at z≈9.3, correcting each galaxy for detection completeness and cosmic variance. The companion criterion is the feedback-free starburst threshold: above a redshift-dependent halo mass (about 10^10.8[(1+z)/10]^−6.2 Msun) and gas density above ~10^3 cm^-3, free-fall times become shorter than the timescale for

Load-bearing premise

The halo mass assigned by abundance matching is the load-bearing assumption — it presumes the photometric reference sample's completeness and redshift cuts are correct, and that the analytic halo mass function at z≈9.3 is accurate near 10^10–10^11 Msun, a regime the paper itself notes may overproduce halos by 20–50%; the AGN-free, feedback-free reading also rests on the absence of broad lines and a particular outflow interpretation.

What would settle it

A spectroscopic census of the high-stellar-mass end of the 142-galaxy reference sample: if many of the massive z=9–10 candidates are actually lower-redshift interlopers, the target's rank drops, its assigned halo mass falls, and ε collapses toward 10% or below; if they are real, the ~60% reading is supported. Alternatively, an independent halo-mass estimate from clustering or lensing would directly confirm or refute the ~10^11 Msun assignment.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The high-mass end of the z≈9–10 galaxy population can be produced with baryon conversion efficiencies of 20% or more, well above the ~10% standard phenomenological models allow.
  • A galaxy with compact radius, young age, low metallicity, and dense gas can reach the FFB regime, so the FFB scenario becomes a concrete explanation for the massive early galaxies seen in recent surveys.
  • If the relaxed-sample value (~60%) survives spectroscopic follow-up, near-maximal baryon conversion exists at cosmic dawn; if it does not, the ~20% robust value still falls inside the duty-cycle-averaged FFB range.
  • The measured outflow implies feedback starts to act at the edge of the FFB regime, so the efficiency ceiling is real but time-limited, not a permanent state.
  • Reliable star-formation efficiencies at z>9 require spectroscopic confirmation of the photometric sample; without it, interlopers can bias the high-mass end and change assigned halo masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the paper leaves implicit: if only a few percent of halos above the FFB threshold are caught in a starburst phase, then a modest number of 'impossibly massive' galaxies in shallow surveys is exactly what the scenario predicts — the argument does not require every massive early galaxy to be efficient.
  • The 20–50% overproduction of massive halos by the standard mass function at z≈10 means the reported ε is likely a lower limit; redoing the matching with an updated mass function would shift the anchor upward, strengthening the FFB interpretation.
  • The same target is a natural testbed for recalibrating AGN-vs-star-formation diagnostics at high redshift: its line ratios sit in the AGN region while broad lines are absent and an outflow is present, so deep spectra of similar galaxies could separate star-formation-driven winds from active nuclei.
  • A direct extension would be to run the identical abundance-matching pipeline on every spectroscopically confirmed z>9 galaxy as spectra accumulate, turning a single-galaxy anchor into a measurement of the scatter in ε and of how quickly the FFB regime shuts off.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a star-formation efficiency (SFE) measurement for the spectroscopically confirmed galaxy UNCOVER 3686 at z=9.31, using abundance matching against a photometric sample at 9<z<10 from the ASTRODEEP-JWST catalog. From a robust photo-z sample of 142 galaxies (31 with spec-z), the authors derive log M*/M_sun=9.55 for UNCOVER 3686, a matched halo mass of log M_h/M_sun~11, and epsilon=0.20 (+0.05/-0.06); a relaxed sample yields epsilon~0.62. The galaxy's compact size, young age, low metallicity, and high gas density are argued to match the feedback-free starburst (FFB) scenario, and the SFE is compared to EMERGE predictions and to FFB duty-cycle-averaged efficiencies. The paper concludes that UNCOVER 3686 is a strong FFB candidate, possibly observed at the edge of feedback-free star formation.

Significance. If the measurement is correct, this would be one of the first quantitative baryon-conversion-efficiency estimates for a spectroscopically confirmed z>9 galaxy, and it would directly test the FFB scenario of Dekel, Li, and collaborators. The paper makes good use of public JWST data and is transparent about many systematic limitations, including the 20-50% Sheth-Tormen halo mass function uncertainty, the possibility of interlopers in the relaxed sample, and the detection of an outflow by the SPURS program. The main value is in establishing a concrete, falsifiable SFE anchor at z~9.3, even though the precision is currently limited by sample definition and systematic uncertainties.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, §3, Appendix C] The paper quotes a lensing magnification of mu=1.6 in §2.1 but never states whether the NIRCam photometry and NIRSpec spectrum used in the BAGPIPES fit (Appendix C) are delensed. If the reported log(M*/M_sun)=9.55 is the image-plane value, the intrinsic stellar mass is ~0.2 dex lower. This would change UNCOVER 3686's rank in the 9<z<10 sample, lower the matched halo mass, and reduce the derived SFE. The 'independent confirmation' in §3 uses the delensed source-plane volume but does not apply the same delensing to the stellar mass, so the confirmation is not internally consistent. Please clarify explicitly and, if necessary, re-run the abundance matching with a demagnified stellar mass.
  2. [§3, Fig. 3.1, Abstract] The central SFE result spans a factor of three depending on sample definition: epsilon=0.20 (+0.05/-0.06) for the Robust-photo-z sample versus epsilon~0.62 for the Relaxed-photo-z sample. The paper acknowledges that the higher value may be driven by interlopers, yet the abstract and conclusions present the range '20-60%' as the headline and claim a 'factor of 2 to 6' excess over EMERGE. This ambiguity is load-bearing because the quantitative FFB test depends on which value is adopted. The authors should designate a primary estimate (likely the robust-sample value) and present the relaxed value as a systematic-bracket, not as an equal-weight alternative.
  3. [Appendix D, Eq. (D.3)-(D.6)] The quoted uncertainties on epsilon include only stellar-mass uncertainties and cosmic variance (Eq. D.6). They do not include the Sheth-Tormen mass-function systematic, which the paper itself notes can overpredict massive halos by 20-50% at z~10, nor the uncertainty from photo-z interlopers and completeness corrections in the reference sample. Because epsilon=M*/(f_b M_h) is inversely proportional to M_h, a 20-50% overestimate of the halo mass function translates directly into a systematically lower epsilon, potentially by a factor comparable to the quoted error bars. The error budget must be expanded to include these sources, or the claim of a 3-4x excess over EMERGE is not yet supported.
  4. [§2.2, §4] The classification of UNCOVER 3686 as feedback-free is weakened by the evidence presented in the paper itself. The [OIII]/Hbeta and [OIII]/[OII] ratios place the galaxy in the AGN region of the BPT diagram; the only excluded AGN is a broad-line (type 1) AGN. Moreover, the SPURS detection of an outflow at v=-161 km/s (Chen et al. 2026) is direct evidence of ongoing feedback. The paper interprets these as consistent with being 'at the edge' of the FFB regime, but an obscured or low-luminosity AGN could also produce the line ratios and outflows without broad lines. This does not necessarily invalidate the FFB interpretation, but it requires additional diagnostics (e.g., X-ray, mid-IR, or high-ionization lines) or a more cautious statement that the galaxy is consistent with, but not uniquely requiring, feedback-free conditions.
  5. [§3, last paragraph] The 'independent confirmation' of epsilon=0.22 by treating UNCOVER 3686 as the most massive spectroscopically confirmed galaxy in the UNCOVER pointing is not independent in a statistical sense: the UNCOVER pointing is a subset of the same ASTRODEEP-JWST footprint used for the main abundance matching, and the same (possibly magnified) stellar mass is used. The delensed source-plane volume ~35 arcmin^2 is a different area normalization, but the galaxy's rank and mass are identical. I recommend removing the word 'independent' or performing a genuinely independent test, e.g., using a different mass estimator or a different survey field.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3, Fig. 3.1 caption] In the caption, 'UNCOVER-3686' is hyphenated while the text uses 'UNCOVER 3686'. Please standardize the nomenclature to match the survey convention.
  2. [Appendix C, Table C.1] The prior for the delayed-tau SFH is 'Uniform' for tau over 0.03-15 Gyr, but the posterior median tau is 7.56 Gyr. This is essentially an old, extended SFH; the authors should discuss whether the derived age and mass are robust to the SFH prior, especially because the derived SFE depends on M*.
  3. [§2.2, line after Eq. (1)] The sentence 'The galaxy also exhibits a prominent, elongated tail extending up to 3.9 kpc from its center' is in §2.2 while the morphological discussion is in Appendix B; consider moving this to the morphology paragraph for clarity.
  4. [References] The reference list contains duplicate entries for Boyett et al. (2024) and Arrabal Haro et al. (2023) with identical years and slightly different page ranges; please merge or disambiguate according to A&A style.
  5. [§3, physical density estimate] The gas density estimate n_gas~3.3x10^2 cm^-3 is derived from M* assuming all stellar mass was initially gas within R_e; the factor of ~10 'cloud contrast' is adopted without a cited justification. Please provide a reference or a sensitivity test for this assumption, as it is used to claim consistency with the FFB threshold.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the SFE measurement is a standard abundance-matching application and the FFB comparison uses prior independent theoretical predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The stellar mass of UNCOVER 3686 comes from BAGPIPES SED fitting to NIRCam/HST photometry plus the NIRSpec PRISM spectrum (Appendix C). The halo mass is assigned not from the target itself but from rank-ordered abundance matching against the external ASTRODEEP-JWST sample at 9<z<10 using the Sheth-Tormen halo mass function (Appendix D). The star-formation efficiency is then defined by Eq. D.3, epsilon = M*/(fb Mh). This is the standard definition/measurement of SFE in an abundance-matching context, not a derivation of the target from the target: the comparison to EMERGE is against an independent empirical model, and the comparison to FFB uses threshold and efficiency predictions from Dekel et al. (2023) and Li et al. (2024), which are prior theoretical calculations not fitted to UNCOVER 3686. The authors' self-citations overlap with one coauthor, but the cited FFB predictions are parameter-free with stated assumptions and are externally falsifiable, so they constitute real independent evidence rather than a circular chain. The 'independent confirmation' using the delensed source-plane volume applies the same abundance-matching procedure with a different volume; it is a consistency check, not a circular reduction. The reviewer's concern about lensing magnification (mu=1.6) and whether the reported stellar mass is delensed is a systematic-uncertainty/correctness issue, not a circularity, because it does not reduce the claimed result to an input by construction. No circular step meeting the required evidentiary standard was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central epsilon measurement rests on five domain assumptions: the Sheth–Tormen mass function at z=9.3 (flagged by the authors as possibly 20–50% off), completeness-corrected photometric sample, photometric-only SED masses, the FFB threshold from a theory sharing an author, and the broad-line-based AGN exclusion. Four numbers are effectively fitted (epsilon, stellar mass, SED properties, sample selection). No truly free parameters enter from new physics, but the result is largely a function of the mass function and sample choices.

free parameters (4)
  • Star-formation efficiency epsilon (abundance matching output) = 0.20 (+0.05/-0.06) robust sample; ~0.62 relaxed sample
    The central measured quantity, defined as M*/(fb M_h), where M_h comes from matching galaxy abundances to the Sheth-Tormen halo mass function. It is a derived fit value, not an independent measurement.
  • Stellar mass log10(M*/M_sun) = 9.55 (+0.08/-0.07) = 9.55
    Derived from BAGPIPES SED fitting with a delayed-tau SFH, Calzetti dust, fixed log U = -2.19; drives the entire epsilon estimate.
  • Stellar age, SFR, metallicity, A_V (SED-fit parameters) = 160 Myr; 29.8 M_sun/yr; 0.2 Z_sun; A_V = 0.6
    Outputs of the BAGPIPES joint photometric+spectroscopic fit used to claim FFB consistency; all are prior-dependent fit values.
  • Sample selection threshold (multi-code photo-z agreement) = Robust (142 galaxies) vs Relaxed (721 galaxies)
    The choice of requiring agreement across four photo-z codes is a hand-set cut that changes the SFE from 20% to 62%.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Sheth–Tormen halo mass function with Planck 2018 parameters is accurate at z = 9.3 for M_h = 10^10–10^11 M_sun.
    Invoked in Appendix D; the paper itself notes it overpredicts massive halo abundance by 20–50% at these redshifts (Boylan-Kolchin 2023; Reed et al. 2003), which is the main systematic on epsilon.
  • domain assumption The ASTRODEEP-JWST photometric sample at 9<z<10 is complete after per-galaxy sigmoid corrections C_j, and the 0.2 deg^2 footprint is representative.
    Used in Eq. D.4 to build the cumulative galaxy abundance n_gal(>M_*); the UNCOVER lensing-field contribution is asserted to be <5% of the footprint.
  • domain assumption BAGPIPES SED fits at fixed photo-z give unbiased stellar masses for the reference sample.
    Stellar masses of all 142/721 reference galaxies come from photometric-only BAGPIPES fits with the same priors; photo-z scatter is not propagated into the SFE errors.
  • domain assumption The FFB threshold log M_h,FFB = 10.10^0.8 [(1+z)/10]^-6.2 M_sun and the epsilon = 0.2–1 prediction of Dekel et al. (2023) / Li et al. (2024) are correct.
    The entire test compares against this threshold; the theory papers are co-authored by one of the present authors (K.C. Sarkar).
  • domain assumption Absence of broad H-beta and [OIII] components suffices to rule out an AGN despite line ratios in the AGN regime of the BPT diagram.
    Section 2.2: the galaxy's [OIII]/H-beta = 14.5 and [OIII]/[OII] = 11.9 place it in the AGN region; exclusion rests on the absence of broad lines in the PRISM spectrum.
invented entities (1)
  • None no independent evidence
    purpose: No new particles, forces, or physical mechanisms are postulated.
    The paper introduces no new entities; it applies the existing FFB scenario to an observed galaxy.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 14510 in / 12004 out tokens · 129422 ms · 2026-08-03T03:58:35.738072+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The efficiency with which galaxies convert their available baryonic reservoir into stars sets a fundamental ceiling on stellar mass assembly in the early Universe and encodes the cumulative effect of stellar feedback. in this paper, we report the measurement of star-formation efficiency (SFE) of a photometrically and spectroscopically vetted reference sample at $z=9-10$, out of which 31 are spectroscopically confirmed. Among them, we highlight a spectroscopically confirmed galaxy, \texttt{UNCOVER 3686} at $z = 9.31$, which has a stellar mass $M_\star = 10^{9.55}$ M$_\odot$ and physical properties comparable to the predictions of the feedback-free starburst (FFB) scenario. We use this galaxy as an anchor for the first direct observational test of whether galaxy at cosmic dawn with physical properties predicted in the FFB theory reach the maximum baryon conversion efficiencies predicted by the feedback-free starburst scenario. We find the SFE for this galaxy to lie between $\approx 20\%$ and $60\%$, a factor of 2 to 6 above empirical model predictions. The compact morphology ($R_e = 0.45$ kpc), young stellar age ($\sim 160$ Myr), low metallicity $(Z_\star/Z_\odot \approx 0.2)$, and inferred gas density $(n_{\rm gas} \sim 3\times 10^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$) of this galaxy are consistent with feedback-free (FFB) galaxy formation conditions. We conclude that UNCOVER 3686 is an excellent candidate for an FFB galaxy in which the global star formation efficiency approaches the theoretical limits due to weak stellar feedback.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29589 by K. Aditya, Kartick C. Sarkar.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Star-formation efficiency, ε = M⋆/(fbMh), as a function of stellar mass derived from abundance matching for galaxies at 9 < z < 10. The upper panel shows the stellar mass distributions of the Robust-photo-z sample (magenta), Relaxed-photo-z sample (orange), and spectroscopically confirmed galaxies (violet); the dashed blue line marks UNCOVER-3686 (log M⋆/M⊙ = 9.55). The lower panels show efficiencies der… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Spectroscopic confirmation of four metal-poor galaxies at z = 10.3-13.2. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w , archivePrefix =. 2212.04568 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Spectroscopic Confirmation of CEERS NIRCam-selected Galaxies at z = 8-10. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54 , archivePrefix =. 2304.05378 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    UV luminosity density results at z > 8 from the first JWST/NIRCam fields: limitations of early data sets and the need for spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1014 , archivePrefix =. 2212.06683 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    JWST NIRSpec Spectroscopy of the Triply Lensed z = 10.17 Galaxy MACS0647 JD. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5da8 , archivePrefix =. 2305.03042 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Confirmation and refutation of very luminous galaxies in the early Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7 , archivePrefix =. 2303.15431 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The nature of an ultra-faint galaxy in the cosmic dark ages seen with JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05994-w , archivePrefix =. 2210.15639 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Science , keywords =

    A magnified compact galaxy at redshift 9.51 with strong nebular emission lines. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.adf5307 , archivePrefix =. 2210.15699 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    JADES: Probing interstellar medium conditions at z 5.5-9.5 with ultra-deep JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346107 , archivePrefix =. 2302.04298 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    A massive interacting galaxy 510 million years after the Big Bang. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02218-7 , archivePrefix =. 2303.00306 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    The onset of star formation 250 million years after the Big Bang. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0117-z , archivePrefix =. 1805.05966 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy of z = 7-9 star-forming galaxies with CEERS: new insight into bright Ly emitters in ionized bubbles. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2763 , archivePrefix =. 2301.07072 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    ALMA FIR View of Ultra-high-redshift Galaxy Candidates at z 11-17: Blue Monsters or Low-z Red Interlopers?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aceb67 , archivePrefix =. 2211.03896 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    JWST Census for the Mass-Metallicity Star Formation Relations at z = 4-10 with Self-consistent Flux Calibration and Proper Metallicity Calibrators. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acd556 , archivePrefix =. 2301.12825 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Lyman Emission from a Luminous z = 8.68 Galaxy: Implications for Galaxies as Tracers of Cosmic Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/810/1/L12 , archivePrefix =. 1507.02679 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Direct T _ e -based Metallicities of z = 2 9 Galaxies with JWST/NIRSpec: Empirical Metallicity Calibrations Applicable from Reionization to Cosmic Noon. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc , archivePrefix =. 2303.08149 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Two remarkably luminous galaxy candidates at z= 10--12 revealed by JWST , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  17. [17]

    Nature , volume=

    A massive galaxy that formed its stars at z = 11 , author=. Nature , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  18. [18]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Revealing galaxy candidates out to z 16 with JWST observations of the lensing cluster SMACS0723 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  19. [19]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    A comprehensive study of galaxies at z 9--16 found in the early JWST data: ultraviolet luminosity functions and cosmic star formation history at the pre-reionization epoch , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  20. [20]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    JWST UNCOVER: the overabundance of ultraviolet-luminous galaxies at z> 9 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  21. [21]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Pure spectroscopic constraints on UV luminosity functions and cosmic star formation history from 25 galaxies at z spec= 8.61--13.20 confirmed with JWST/NIRSpec , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  22. [22]

    A population of red candidate massive galaxies\

    Labb. A population of red candidate massive galaxies\. Nature , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  23. [23]

    Nature , volume=

    Accelerated formation of ultra-massive galaxies in the first billion years , author=. Nature , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  24. [24]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    Stress testing CDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  25. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Hidden little monsters: spectroscopic identification of low-mass, broad-line AGNs at z> 5 with CEERS , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  26. [26]

    Nature , volume=

    A massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.658 , author=. Nature , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  27. [27]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    Efficient formation of a massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.9 , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  28. [28]

    Nature , volume=

    Confirmation and refutation of very luminous galaxies in the early Universe , author=. Nature , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 , archivePrefix =. 1205.5807 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    EMERGE - an empirical model for the formation of galaxies since z 10. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty655 , archivePrefix =. 1705.05373 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    A Redshift-independent Efficiency Model: Star Formation and Stellar Masses in Dark Matter Halos at z 4. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e0 , archivePrefix =. 1806.03299 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    The Connection Between Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756 , archivePrefix =. 1804.03097 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    The UNCOVER Survey: A First-look HST + JWST Catalog of 60,000 Galaxies near A2744 and beyond. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad07e0 , archivePrefix =. 2301.02671 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Medium Bands, Mega Science: A JWST/NIRCam Medium-band Imaging Survey of A2744. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe , archivePrefix =. 2404.13132 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    UNCOVERing the extended strong lensing structures of Abell 2744 with the deepest JWST imaging. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1627 , archivePrefix =. 2212.04381 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    The UNCOVER Survey: A First-look HST+JWST Catalog of Galaxy Redshifts and Stellar Population Properties Spanning 0.2 z 15. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad0846 , archivePrefix =. 2310.01276 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The UNCOVER Survey: First Release of Ultradeep JWST/NIRSpec PRISM Spectra for 700 Galaxies from z 0.3 13 in A2744. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1 , archivePrefix =. 2408.03920 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    The JWST UNCOVER Treasury Survey: Ultradeep NIRSpec and NIRCam Observations before the Epoch of Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf , archivePrefix =. 2212.04026 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Zenodo , year=

    msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools , author=. Zenodo , year=

  40. [40]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    EAZY: a fast, public photometric redshift code , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Ionization state of inter-stellar medium in galaxies: evolution, SFR-M _ * -Z dependence, and ionizing photon escape. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu902 , archivePrefix =. 1309.0207 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    [O iii] emission line as a tracer of star-forming galaxies at high redshifts: comparison between H and [O iii] emitters at z= 2.23 in HiZELS , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  43. [43]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    UNCOVERing the Faint End of the z 7 [O iii] Luminosity Function with JWST’s F410M Medium Bandpass Filter , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  44. [44]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    JADES: Detecting [OIII] 4363 emitters and testing strong line calibrations in the high-z Universe with ultra-deep JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy up to z 9.5 , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  45. [45]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Medium Bands, Mega Science: A JWST/NIRCam Medium-band Imaging Survey of A2744 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  46. [46]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    UNCOVER: illuminating the early universe—JWST/NIRSpec confirmation of z> 12 galaxies , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  47. [47]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    Stellar population inference with Prospector , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  48. [48]

    Astronomy and Computing , keywords =

    HMFcalc: An online tool for calculating dark matter halo mass functions. Astronomy and Computing , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2013.11.001 , archivePrefix =. 1306.6721 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , author=. Astron. Astrophys , volume=

    2018

  50. [50]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Large-scale bias and the peak background split , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  51. [51]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Evolution of the mass function of dark matter haloes , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  52. [52]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z= 0- 10 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  53. [53]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free starbursts , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  54. [54]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Feedback-free starbursts at cosmic dawn-Observable predictions for JWST , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  55. [55]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    A massive interacting galaxy 510 million years after the Big Bang , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  56. [56]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The JWST Spectroscopic Properties of Galaxies at z=9-14. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.08245 , archivePrefix =. 2507.08245 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.08245

  57. [57]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    UNCOVER: a NIRSpec census of lensed galaxies at z= 8.50--13.08 probing a high-AGN fraction and ionized bubbles in the shadow , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  58. [58]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Excitation and ionization properties of star-forming galaxies at z= 2.0--9.3 with JWST/NIRSpec , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  59. [59]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Assessing the sources of reionization: a spectroscopic case study of a 30 lensed galaxy at z 5 with Ly , C iv, Mg ii, and [Ne iii] , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  60. [60]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Inferring the star formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with BAGPIPES: evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  61. [61]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Breaking Through the Cosmic Fog: JWST/NIRSpec Constraints on Ionizing Photon Escape in Reionization-Era Galaxies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.01096 , archivePrefix =. 2507.01096 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.01096

  62. [62]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    ASTRODEEP-JWST: NIRCam-HST multi-band photometry and redshifts for half a million sources in six extragalactic deep fields , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  63. [63]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    Photometric Redshifts and Selection of High-Redshift Galaxiesin the NTT and Hubble DeepFields , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  64. [64]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    COSMOS-Web: Stellar mass assembly in relation to dark matter halos across 0.2< z< 12 of cosmic history , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    Modelling and interpreting spectral energy distributions of galaxies with BEAGLE. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1756 , archivePrefix =. 1603.03037 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/308692 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9911459 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The dynamics and outcome of star formation with jets, radiation, winds, and supernovae in concert , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  68. [68]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Infrared radiation feedback does not regulate star cluster formation , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  69. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.22460 , year=

    Spatially resolved metallicity and ionization in the merging system Gz9p3 at z= 9.3 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.22460 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Morphology of Galaxies in JWST Fields: Initial Distribution and Evolution of Galaxy Morphology , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  71. [71]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Spectral Templates Optimal for Selecting Galaxies at z> 8 with the JWST , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  72. [72]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    A flexible analytic model of cosmic variance in the first billion years , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  73. [73]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A census of photometrically selected little red dots at 4< z< 9 in JWST blank fields , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  74. [74]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    The first billion years according to JWST , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  75. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01445 , year=

    Galaxy formation in the first billion years , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01445 , year=

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.21516 , year=

    SPURS: Bursty Star Formation in an Extremely Luminous Weak Emission Line Galaxy at z= 9.3 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.21516 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14486 , year=

    A first systematic study of [OIII] 88 mu m at z> 8 : two luminous oxygen lines and a powerful ionized outflow in the first 600 million years , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14486 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The brightest galaxies at cosmic dawn , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  79. [79]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The galaxy UV luminosity function before the epoch of reionization , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  80. [80]

    Galaxy build-up in the first 1.5 Gyr of cosmic history: insights from the stellar mass function at z\

    Weibel, Andrea and Oesch, Pascal A and Barrufet, Laia and Gottumukkala, Rashmi and Ellis, Richard S and Santini, Paola and Weaver, John R and Allen, Natalie and Bouwens, Rychard and Bowler, Rebecca AA and others , journal=. Galaxy build-up in the first 1.5 Gyr of cosmic history: insights from the stellar mass function at z\. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

Showing first 80 references.