Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

In easy-plane ErMn6Sn6, breaking U(1) spin-rotation symmetry hybridizes right- and left-handed magnon bands at their crossing, making magnon chirality reverse with momentum.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

In ErMn6Sn6, planar magnetic anisotropy breaks the symmetry that separates left- and right-handed magnons, forcing them to hybridize and reverse chirality with momentum; in TbMn6Sn6 the crossing remains protected.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection A clean symmetry-driven story about chiral magnon hybridization in a bulk ferrimagnet; the central observation is robust, but the chirality-reversal claim leans on model parameters that deserve a robustness pass. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00210 v1 pith:ETIZUW6W submitted 2026-07-31 cond-mat.str-el

Chiral Magnon Mixing by Symmetry-Breaking in Collinear Ferrimagnets

Dhurba R. Jaishi , Tyler J. Slade , S. X. M. Riberolles , Bing Li , Tianxiong Han , D. M. Pajerowski , D. L. Abernathy , Barry Winn
show 3 more authors
Melissa Graves-Brook B. G. Ueland R. J. McQueeney
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Chiral magnonsFerrimagnetsMagnon hybridizationSpin angular momentumPolarized inelastic neutron scatteringRMn6Sn6U(1) symmetry breakingMagnon chirality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that in the collinear ferrimagnet ErMn6Sn6, easy-plane magnetic anisotropy breaks the U(1) symmetry that normally keeps right- and left-handed magnons independent, allowing the acoustic and optic magnon bands to hybridize where they cross. The hybridized bands carry elliptical, mixed-chirality excitations whose net spin angular momentum passes through zero and reverses sign: each band's dynamical chirality becomes momentum-dependent. In TbMn6Sn6, whose uniaxial order preserves U(1), the same crossing stays a protected nodal line. Using polarized inelastic neutron scattering, the authors measure the chiral neutron cross-section and show the sign reversal predicted by their linear spin-wave model. The result matters because it gives a symmetry-based knob—field, temperature, or rare-earth substitution—to switch magnon handedness in a single material.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the chirality of magnons in a ferrimagnet is not fixed by the sublattice compensation; it can be mixed and reversed within a single band when the magnetic structure's spin-rotation symmetry is broken. In ErMn6Sn6 the planar magnetic order has only twofold rotational symmetry, and the rare-earth crystalline-electric-field anisotropy (terms of the form K_yy S_y^2 + K_zz S_z^2) couples the right- and left-handed SAM basis states |±>. The resulting off-diagonal matrix elements ⟨±|V|∓⟩ ∝ |K_yy - K_zz| open a hybridization gap at the acoustic-optic crossing. The two gapped modes are elliptically polarized superpositions whose total spin angular momentum (summed over M

What carries the argument

The central object is the U(1) spin-rotation symmetry around the net magnetization direction. When preserved, the right/left circular magnon polarizations carry quantized SAM S_z = ∓ℏ and do not mix. Easy-plane anisotropy of the form V = K_yy S_y^2 + K_zz S_z^2 breaks U(1); its off-diagonal matrix elements coupling the |±> SAM states are proportional to |K_yy - K_zz|, so the hybridization gap at the band crossing is set by the net yz anisotropy. The chiral neutron scattering cross-section σ_ch(Q,ω), which measures antisymmetric spin correlations weighted by the magnon eigenvectors and magnetic structure factor, provides the observable, while the mode spin angular momentum S_ν = W_R S_R + W_M

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the fitted spin-wave Hamiltonian—especially the rare-earth crystal-field coefficients that set the easy-plane anisotropy—being accurate enough that the eigenvector-derived spin angular momentum, and not just the raw chiral cross-section sign, correctly identifies the mode chirality and its reversal.

What would settle it

Measure the hybridization gap in ErMn6Sn6 as an applied magnetic field drives the moments from easy-plane to easy-axis: if the gap persists when U(1) symmetry is restored, the symmetry-breaking mechanism is wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In ErMn6Sn6, each hybridized magnon band carries momentum-dependent chirality: the total spin angular momentum changes sign across the avoided crossing, enabling handedness encoding within a single band.
  • The symmetry of the ferrimagnetic order controls whether the magnon crossing is a protected nodal line (TbMn6Sn6) or a gapped hybridization (ErMn6Sn6), so spin-reorientation transitions—via field or temperature—switch the mechanism on and off.
  • Because the hybridization gap scales with the net anisotropy difference |K_yy - K_zz|, tuning the rare-earth crystal-field parameters (e.g., B6^6, B0^4) tunes the gap and can drive the system from gapped back to crossing.
  • The measured chiral cross-section sign change in ErMn6Sn6 matches calculations, establishing a neutron-scattering signature for chiral magnon mixing.
  • This provides a new mechanism for manipulating magnon chirality that complements compensation-temperature and field-driven reversal, relevant for chirality-based quantum magnonics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism is likely generic: any collinear ferrimagnet with easy-plane anisotropy and a finite-momentum acoustic–optic crossing should exhibit analogous chiral mixing; searching other R166 compounds or rare-earth–transition-metal ferrimagnets with easy-plane order would test this.
  • The intra-band zero-chirality point, where the two sublattices precess with opposite handedness and cancel, is a magnonic analogue of linear polarization and could serve as a basis for interference or decoherence-resistant states, though the paper does not explore this.
  • A practical caution follows from the paper's own analysis: the raw chiral cross-section sign can flip between Brillouin zones because of the structure factor, so experimentally confirming chirality reversal requires eigenvector-based SAM extraction, not just sign of σ_ch.
  • Applying this symmetry-breaking logic to antiferromagnets with weak anisotropy suggests a way to engineer hybridization gaps without an applied field, but that extension goes beyond the present data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports polarized and unpolarized inelastic neutron scattering on the collinear ferrimagnets TbMn6Sn6 and ErMn6Sn6, together with linear spin-wave calculations, and proposes a symmetry-based mechanism for chiral magnon mixing. In TbMn6Sn6, where the easy-axis magnetic order preserves an effective U(1) symmetry, the acoustic and optic magnon bands cross without hybridizing and the two modes retain pure opposite chirality. In ErMn6Sn6, the easy-plane order breaks U(1) and the crossing develops a gap; the gapped modes are elliptically polarized superpositions of the SAM eigenstates, and the authors claim that the lower band's chirality reverses with momentum near the hybridization point. The central experimental observations are the crossing in Tb166, the gap in Er166, and a sign change in the half-polarized chiral neutron cross-section near the avoided crossing. The mode-resolved chirality reversal is inferred from linear spin-wave eigenvectors computed with Hamiltonian parameters taken from prior work.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper identifies a new and potentially useful mechanism for manipulating magnon chirality in ferrimagnets: the anisotropy-driven symmetry breaking that turns protected band crossings into hybridized gaps with momentum-dependent chirality. This is relevant to chiral magnonics and to the broader family of RMn6Sn6 kagome magnets, where spin-reorientation transitions could switch the chirality by temperature or field. The manuscript is strengthened by the use of new half-polarized INS data on ErMn6Sn6, an explicit symmetry argument for the Tb/Er difference, and a clearly described model calculation. The data are openly available, and the LSWT framework is standard. However, the quantitative support for the headline chirality-reversal claim is currently limited: no error bars are shown on the chiral maps, no quantitative data-model comparison is reported, and the SAM reversal relies on model eigenvectors whose parameters carry no quoted uncertainties. These gaps are load-bearing because the raw chiral cross-section sign is not by itself a direct measure of the mode SAM.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2 and §Experimental results] The statement that the half-polarized data 'confirm the predicted reversal of the magnon handedness' is supported only by qualitative color maps in Fig. 2(c-d). No error bars, statistical uncertainties, or background-subtraction details are given for the extracted σ_ch, and no quantitative comparison is made between the measured and calculated sign-change wavevector or the magnitude of the hybridization gap. Because σ_ch is an antisymmetric difference of two large scattering channels, small systematic errors (flipper efficiency, incomplete polarization, background) can create apparent sign changes. The authors should provide line cuts of σ_ch with uncertainties, show the sign-change point quantitatively, and state how well the model reproduces it. This is central to the paper's main claim.
  2. [§Mode chiralities, Eq. (1), and SI Table S1/Fig. S4] The chirality reversal within a single band is not measured directly; it is obtained from the linear spin-wave eigenvectors using the Hamiltonian parameters in Table S1, which are taken from earlier fits (Refs. [29,30]) with no reported uncertainties. As the paper itself notes near Fig. 1(f), the sign of σ_ch can change because of the magnetic structure factor even when the intrinsic mode SAM does not reverse. Thus the observed σ_ch sign change near the avoided crossing could in principle result from a shift of sublattice weight rather than from an actual reversal of the total mode SAM. To make the central claim convincing, the authors should demonstrate that the measured σ_ch profile tracks the calculated SAM sign (not merely the calculated σ_ch), and should perform a robustness analysis of the total-SAM zero crossing over the credible parameter ranges, including B0^4 as well as B6^6. T
  3. [§Magnetic symmetry and SI Sec. SII(C)] The symmetry argument for why Tb166 has a protected crossing while Er166 does not is clear and plausible. However, the paper states that the hybridization gap is proportional to the net yz anisotropy, yet Fig. S4 shows the gap as a function of B6^6 only, not of K_Ryy − K_Rzz, and the relationship to B0^4 is not tested. Since the difference (K_Ryy − K_Rzz) is the quantity that controls mixing per Eq. (3), the authors should either give the analytic dependence or plot the gap versus the anisotropy difference over a parameter range that includes the values where the gap closes (e.g., the 5×B6^6 point in Fig. S4). This would strengthen the claimed connection between crystal-field anisotropy and chiral hybridization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction] The term 'R166' is used without definition in the abstract and introduction; define it at first use for readers outside the RMn6Sn6 community.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The displayed chiral cross-section formula has a typographically awkward 'i[...]' and missing angular brackets in the time correlation; please clean up the notation so that the antisymmetric correlation is unambiguous.
  3. [SI Fig. S4 caption and text] The text says the gap closes when B6^6 is increased by 'five times' while the caption says 'four times'; reconcile these numbers.
  4. [Reference list] Reference [33] has a malformed author name ('N. L, T. Victa Trevisan'); please correct.
  5. [Fig. 1(f)] The calculated chiral scattering in Fig. 1(f) is difficult to read near the crossing and near H=1; larger panels or separate color-scale plots for the two modes would clarify the predicted sign change versus the structure-factor effect.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the chiral-reversal prediction is a derived eigenvector property computed with parameters fitted in prior work and is compared to new half-polarized INS data, not fitted to those data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The chiral cross-section (Eq. 1) is an independently measured observable; the mode SAM (Eqs. 4-7) is computed from the linear-spin-wave eigenvectors, not fitted to the polarized data. Hamiltonian parameters in Table S1 are taken from prior publications (Refs. [29,30]) that fitted unpolarized INS and thermodynamic data; the current paper's half-polarized HYSPEC measurements are new and did not set those constants. The sign-reversal claim is an out-of-sample eigenvector prediction that is then compared to the new σ_ch data. The paper explicitly acknowledges the structure-factor ambiguity in the paragraph beginning 'While the neutron scattering data are definitive...' and therefore also presents the SAM calculation, which is the actual basis for the chirality-reversal claim. The SI sensitivity scan (Fig. S4) shows the gap depends on B6^6 and B0^4; this is a parameter-accuracy/robustness limitation, not a circularity, because varying the parameter changes the prediction rather than tautologically reproducing it. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-by-citation, or renaming of a known result is involved. The central symmetry argument (U(1) vs twofold) is developed from the Hamiltonian form V=K_yy S_y^2 + K_zz S_z^2, not imported from a self-citation. Thus the central claim retains independent content and the self-citations used for parameters constitute real, externally falsifiable evidence rather than circular support.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central 'prediction' rests on a spin Hamiltonian whose parameters were fit to prior data on the same compounds; no new independent microscopic derivation is given. No new particles, mediators, or conserved quantities are introduced; the hybridized chiral magnons are modes of the existing Hamiltonian.

free parameters (9)
  • J_MM0 (Mn intralayer exchange) = -28.80 meV (both Tb166, Er166)
    Input to LSWT Hamiltonian (Table S1); fitted in Refs. [29,30].
  • J_RM (R-Mn exchange) = 1.10 meV (Tb), 0.315 meV (Er)
    Sets the R-Mn coupling and the relative sublattice weights of the magnon modes; fitted in Refs. [29,30].
  • J_MM1 (Mn interlayer exchange) = -4.40 meV (Tb), -6.57 meV (Er)
    Fitted exchange parameter in Table S1; affects dispersion and crossing position.
  • J_MM2 (Mn interlayer exchange) = -19.20 meV (both)
    Fitted exchange parameter in Table S1.
  • J_MM3 (Mn interlayer exchange) = 1.80 meV (Tb), 3.219 meV (Er)
    Fitted exchange parameter in Table S1.
  • K_M (Mn single-ion easy-plane anisotropy) = 0.88 meV (Tb), 0.20 meV (Er)
    Fitted anisotropy parameter in Table S1; contributes to the magnon gap and ellipticities.
  • B0_2 (Er/Tb CEF parameter) = -8.675e-3 meV (Tb), 0.012 meV (Er)
    Fitted CEF parameter in Table S1; controls the rare-earth anisotropy and hence the U(1) breaking.
  • B0_4 (Er/Tb CEF parameter) = -1.430e-3 meV (Tb), -4.059e-4 meV (Er)
    Fitted CEF parameter in Table S1; affects K_Rzz and the hybridization gap.
  • B6_6 (Er CEF parameter) = 0 (Tb), 0.588e-5 meV (Er)
    Fitted CEF parameter in Table S1; directly controls K_Ryy and therefore the chiral mixing strength in Er166.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Holstein-Primakoff linear spin-wave approximation is valid for the magnon modes at low temperature.
    All chiral scattering and SAM calculations use linear LSWT (SI §II.A); magnon interactions and nonlinear corrections are neglected.
  • domain assumption The magnetic ground states are as assumed: Tb166 uniaxial easy-axis, Er166 planar easy-axis with net magnetization along a* after 0.12 T.
    The symmetry argument and model depend on these structures, taken from prior neutron diffraction work [27,29,30].
  • domain assumption In Tb166, sixfold B6^6 anisotropy terms vanish at linear order in spin-wave theory, preserving effective U(1) symmetry.
    Invoked in the 'Magnetic symmetry' section; if they contributed at linear order, Tb166 would also hybridize.
  • domain assumption The half-polarized channel difference (I+0 - I-0)/2 isolates the chiral correlation σ_ch with negligible polarization-inefficiency contamination (flipping ratio 15).
    Used to extract σ_ch from HYSPEC; no final polarization analysis and no field reversal were performed.
  • standard math Equations (4)-(7) correctly map magnon eigenvector ellipticities to sublattice and total SAM, and χ = S·k/ħ defines dynamical chirality.
    These are definitions and standard relations from linear spin-wave theory, used to convert σ_ch to a chirality statement.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral Magnon Mixing by Symmetry-Breaking in Collinear Ferrimagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ETIZUW6W

@misc{pith2026260800210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral Magnon Mixing by Symmetry-Breaking in Collinear Ferrimagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ETIZUW6W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00210}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Magnons in ferromagnets possess spin angular momentum defined by right-handed precession of the moment around the magnetization direction. In antiferromagnets with no net magnetization, left-and right-handed magnons are degenerate in the absence of an applied field. Ferrimagnets possess uncompensated magnetic sublattices, which should natively possess right-and left-handed magnons where their energy is split by the internal molecular field. Here, we show that RMn6Sn6 (R = Tb, Er) ferrimagnets possess right and left-handed magnon bands that cross at finite momentum (k) within the basal plane, defining modes with opposite dynamical chirality. Depending on the symmetry of the ferrimagnetic order, which may be manipulated by varying the rare-earth magnetic anisotropy or with applied field, the band crossing may remain a nodal line or may be gapped. The gapped modes contain hybridized chiral excitations whose chirality becomes k-dependent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00210 by Barry Winn, B. G. Ueland, Bing Li, Dhurba R. Jaishi, D. L. Abernathy, D. M. Pajerowski, Melissa Graves-Brook, R. J. McQueeney, S. X. M. Riberolles, Tianxiong Han, Tyler J. Slade.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The chiral spectra from Eqn

    Bragg peak forE i of 15 meV, indicating minimal de- polarization of the incident beam. The chiral spectra from Eqn. (1) are extracted from the channel difference, σch = 1 2 (I +0 −I −0) [35, 36]. The channel average mea- sures the conventional magnetic response for unpolarized neutrons,σ M = 1 2 (I +0 +I −0)∝ ⟨Mα ⊥(Q)M †α ⊥(Q, t)⟩ω. Figures 2(a)–(b), show...

  2. [2]

    M. W. Daniels, R. Cheng, W. Yu, J. Xiao, and D. Xiao, Nonabelian magnonics in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134450 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    B. Lenk, H. Ulrichs, F. Garbs, and M. M¨ unzenberg, The building blocks of magnonics, Phys. Rep.507, 107 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Advances in coherent magnonics, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 1114 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Phys. Rep.965, 1 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. c. v. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. c. v. Jungwirth, Chiral Magnons in Altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral Split Magnon in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Nambu, J

    Y. Nambu, J. Barker, Y. Okino, T. Kikkawa, Y. Sh- iomi, M. Enderle, T. Weber, B. Winn, M. Graves-Brook, J. M. Tranquada, T. Ziman, M. Fujita, G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and K. Kakurai, Observation of Magnon Po- larization, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 027201 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    C. Kim, S. Lee, H.-G. Kim, J.-H. Park, K.-W. Moon, J. Y. Park, J. M. Yuk, K.-J. Lee, B.-G. Park, S. K. Kim, K.-J. Kim, and C. Hwang, Distinct handedness of spin wave across the compensation temperatures of ferrimag- nets, Nat. Mater.19, 980 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Mori and T

    M. Mori and T. Ziman, Magnetic Structures and Spin- Wave Excitations in Rare-Earth Iron Garnets Near the Compensation Temperature, IEEE Trans. Magn.59, 1 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    L. Wang, L. Shen, H. Bai, H.-A. Zhou, K. Shen, and W. Jiang, Electrical Excitation and Detection of Chi- ral Magnons in a Compensated Ferrimagnetic Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 166705 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Y. Li, W. Wang, C. Liu, A. Chen, D. Zheng, T. Yang, M. Tang, B. Fang, Y. Ma, K. Shen, A. Manchon, Z. Qiu, and X. Zhang, Distinct Transmission of Left- and Right-Handed Magnon Modes in Compensated Fer- rimagnet/Antiferromagnet Structures, Adv. Mater.37, 2416190 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Shiota, T

    Y. Shiota, T. Taniguchi, D. Hayashi, H. Narita, S. Karube, R. Hisatomi, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, Handedness manipulation of propagating antiferromag- netic magnons, Nat. Commun.15, 9750 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. Qiu, J. Chen, S. Wu, H. Wang, I. A. Malik, M. Cai, M. Wu, P. Gao, C. Hua, W. Yu, J. Xiao, Y. Jiang, H. Yu, K. Shen, and J. Zhang, Switchable long-distance propagation of chiral magnonic edge states, Nat. Mater. 24, 69 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    M. Li, J. Lu, and W. He, Symmetry breaking induced magnon-magnon coupling in synthetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B103, 064429 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    A. Sud, K. Yamamoto, K. Z. Suzuki, S. Mizukami, and H. Kurebayashi, Magnon-magnon coupling in synthetic ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 104407 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Y. Liu, Z. Xu, L. Liu, K. Zhang, Y. Meng, Y. Sun, P. Gao, H.-W. Zhao, Q. Niu, and J. Li, Switching magnon chi- rality in artificial ferrimagnet, Nat. Commun.13, 1264 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Shiota, T

    Y. Shiota, T. Taniguchi, M. Ishibashi, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, Tunable Magnon-Magnon Coupling Mediated by Dynamic Dipolar Interaction in Synthetic Antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 017203 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Z. Jin, T. Gong, J. Liu, H. Yang, Z. Zeng, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Strong Coupling of Chiral Magnons in Altermag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 126702 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Y. Duan, A. Cong, and K. Shen, Magnon hybridization in easy-axis ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, L051006 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, S. S. Zhang, H.-J. Tien, N. Shumiya, G. Cheng, K. Jiang, B. Lian, Z. Song, G. Chang, I. Belopolski1, D. Multer, M. Litske- vich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, B. Swidler, H. Zhou, H. Lin, T. Neupert, Z. Wang, N. Yao, T.-R. Chang, S. Jia, and M. Z. Hasan, Quantum-limit Chern topolog- ical magnetism in TbMn 6Sn6, Nature583...

    2020

  23. [23]

    W. Ma, X. Xu, J.-X. Yin, H. Yang, H. Zhou, Z.-J. Cheng, Y. Huang, Z. Qu, F. Wang, M. Z. Hasan, and S. Jia, Rare earth engineering inRMn 6Sn6 (R= Gd−Tm,Lu) topo- logical kagome magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 246602 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Dhakal, F

    G. Dhakal, F. Cheenicode Kabeer, A. K. Pathak, F. Kabir, N. Poudel, R. Filippone, J. Casey, A. Prad- han Sakhya, S. Regmi, C. Sims, K. Dimitri, P. Man- frinetti, K. Gofryk, P. M. Oppeneer, and M. Neupane, Anisotropically large anomalous and topological hall ef- fect in a kagome magnet, Phys. Rev. B104, L161115 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    Y. Lee, R. Skomski, X. Wang, P. P. Orth, Y. Ren, B. Kang, A. K. Pathak, A. Kutepov, B. N. Harmon, R. J. McQueeney, I. I. Mazin, and L. Ke, Interplay between magnetism and band topology in the kagome magnets RMn6Sn6, Phys. Rev. B108, 045132 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Venturini, B

    G. Venturini, B. C. El Idrissi, and B. Malaman, Magnetic properties ofRMn 6Sn6 (R= Sc,Y,Gd−Tm,Lu) com- pounds with HfFe 6Ge6 type structure, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.94, 35 (1991)

    1991

  27. [27]

    Venturini, D

    G. Venturini, D. Fruchart, and B. Malaman, Incommen- surate magnetic structures ofRMn 6Sn6 (R= Sc,Y,Lu) compounds from neutron diffraction study, J. Alloys Compd.236, 102 (1996)

    1996

  28. [28]

    Malaman, G

    B. Malaman, G. Venturini, R. Welter, J. Sanchez, P. Vul- liet, and E. Ressouche, Magnetic properties ofRMn 6Sn6 (R= Gd−Er) compounds from neutron diffraction and M¨ ossbauer measurements, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.202, 519 (1999)

    1999

  29. [29]

    Rosenfeld and N

    E. Rosenfeld and N. Mushnikov, Double-flat-spiral mag- netic structures: Theory and application to theRMn 6X6 compounds, Physica B: Condens. Matter403, 1898 (2008)

    2008

  30. [30]

    S. X. M. Riberolles, T. J. Slade, D. L. Abernathy, G. E. Granroth, B. Li, Y. Lee, P. C. Canfield, B. G. Ueland, L. Ke, and R. J. McQueeney, Low-Temperature Compet- ing Magnetic Energy Scales in the Topological Ferrimag- net TbMn6Sn6, Phys. Rev. X12, 021043 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    S. X. M. Riberolles, T. Han, T. J. Slade, J. M. Wilde, A. Sapkota, W. Tian, Q. Zhang, D. L. Abernathy, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, R. J. McQueeney, and B. G. Ueland, New insight into tuning magnetic phases ofRMn 6Sn6 kagome metals, npj Quantum Mater. 9, 42 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Fruhling, A

    K. Fruhling, A. Streeter, S. Mardanya, X. Wang, P. Baral, O. Zaharko, I. I. Mazin, S. Chowdhury, W. D. Ratcliff, and F. Tafti, Topological Hall effect induced by chiral fluctuations in ErMn 6Sn6, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 094411 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    S. X. M. Riberolles, T. J. Slade, R. Dally, P. Sarte, B. Li, T. Han, H. Lane, C. Stock, H. Bhandari, N. Ghimire, D. L. Abernathy, P. C. Canfield, J. W. Lynn, B. G. Ueland, and R. J. McQueeney, Orbital character of the spin-reorientation transition in TbMn 6Sn6, Nat. Com- mun.14, 2658 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    N. L, T. Victa Trevisan, and R. J. McQueeney, High- field magnetic phase diagrams of theRMn 6Sn6 (R= Gd−Tm) kagome metals, Phys. Rev. B111, 054410 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    [8, 30, 33]

    See Supplemental Material at [url] for additional de- tails on experimental methods and the model calculations which also includes Refs. [8, 30, 33]

  36. [36]

    Chatterji,Neutron scattering from magnetic materials (Elsevier, Science, 2006)

    T. Chatterji,Neutron scattering from magnetic materials (Elsevier, Science, 2006)

    2006

  37. [37]

    Simonet, M

    V. Simonet, M. Loire, and R. Ballou, Magnetic chirality as probed by neutron scattering, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 7 213, 5 (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    Kamra, U

    A. Kamra, U. Agrawal, and W. Belzig, Noninteger-spin magnonic excitations in untextured magnets, Phys. Rev. B96, 020411 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    Liensberger, A

    L. Liensberger, A. Kamra, H. Maier-Flaig, S. Gepr¨ ags, A. Erb, S. T. B. Goennenwein, R. Gross, W. Belzig, H. Huebl, and M. Weiler, Exchange-Enhanced Ultra- strong Magnon-Magnon Coupling in a Compensated Fer- rimagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 117204 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Kamra, W

    A. Kamra, W. Belzig, and A. Brataas, Magnon-squeezing as a niche of quantum magnonics, Appl. Phys. Lett.117, 090501 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    D. R. Jaishi, S. X. M. Riberolles, B. Li, T. Han, D. M. Pajerowski, D. L. Abernathy, B. Winn, B. G. Ueland, and R. J. McQueeney, Chiral magnetic excitations in the ferrimagnetic state of rare-earth kagome metalRMn 6Sn6 (R= Tb,Er),https://doi.org/10.14461/oncat.data/ 3367291. Supplemental Materials for Chiral Magnon Mixing by Symmetry-Breaking in Collinear...

    work page doi:10.14461/oncat.data/ 2015

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.