Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 144 references

Artificial intelligence is the common design framework that can make movable, fluid, and pinching antennas practical.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 00:53 UTC pith:KSNAZQ33

load-bearing objection Competent and useful survey with a cross-architecture AI taxonomy, but the 'practical' framing overstates a simulation-only evidence base that the paper itself admits. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00255 v1 pith:KSNAZQ33 submitted 2026-07-31 eess.SP

Artificial Intelligence for Spatially Reconfigurable Antennas: Movable, Fluid, and Pinching Antenna Systems

Nguyen Cong Luong , Zeping Sui , Thai-Hoc Vu , Jie Cao , Bo Ma , Thuan Van Le , Xunyang Zhan , Nguyen Duc Hai
show 5 more authors
Min Xu Qiushi Zhao Dong In Kim Yonghong Zeng Shaohan Feng
This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords movable antennasfluid antenna systemspinching antennasdeep reinforcement learningbeamformingchannel estimationintegrated sensing and communication6G
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that three 6G antenna concepts — movable antennas, fluid antenna systems, and pinching antenna systems — are one problem viewed three ways: how to exploit spatial reconfigurability as an extra degree of freedom. Its unifying claim is that AI is the design framework that makes this reconfigurability practical, since the joint optimization of antenna configuration with beamforming, channel estimation, sensing, security, and resource allocation is high-dimensional, non-convex, mixed discrete-continuous, and time-varying. The survey supports this by classifying recent work by optimization objective and by mapping each antenna architecture's physics to the suitable AI tool: continuous position control for MAs, discrete port selection for FASs, and waveguide-constrained near-field placement for PASSs. A sympathetic reader would care because the promised payoff is millisecond-scale learned decisions instead of repeated optimization, at the price of trusting simulation-trained policies on real hardware.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that AI is not merely an additional technique but a common design framework for making spatial reconfigurability practical. Across the three architectures, antenna configuration is coupled with channel acquisition, beamforming, user scheduling, power control, trajectory design, phase-shift optimization, and task-oriented resource allocation; these problems are high-dimensional, non-convex, mixed discrete-continuous, and time-varying. The survey argues that learned policies — deep learning and Transformers for fast prediction, deep reinforcement learning and multi-agent RL for sequential decisions, graph neural networks for scalability, large language models for c

What carries the argument

The mechanism carrying the argument is the spatial configuration variable, defined differently in each architecture: a continuous position vector for MA, a discrete port index for FAS, and a continuous longitudinal coordinate along a dielectric waveguide for PASS. Because the channel depends on this variable, every design task becomes a joint optimization whose difficulty grows with the configuration space. The paper's taxonomy — grouping studies by the coupling problem they solve, and then by the AI model family used — is what allows the authors to treat the three architectures as instances of one framework. Structure-guided learning is the key bridge: KKT-guided Transformers for PASS learn

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that offline-trained AI policies, developed largely on simulated channel models, can be robust and fast enough for real-time use; the paper itself notes that measured MA, FAS, and PASS datasets are scarce and sim-to-real gaps remain.

What would settle it

A controlled hardware testbed would settle it: train any of the surveyed MA, FAS, or PASS policies on the standard simulation channels, then run them on measured channels in the same deployment. If the learned policy's throughput, secrecy rate, or sensing accuracy is no better than a fixed-position baseline once acquisition overhead and actuator/switching latency are included, the common-framework claim fails. The paper itself pinpoints this gap: most policies are trained and evaluated in simulation, so the test is whether the gains survive transfer.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Learned inference can cut decision latency from hundreds of milliseconds to a few milliseconds (e.g., 7.89 ms vs 644 ms for a movable-antenna positioning/beamforming example), making real-time reconfiguration feasible within a coherence interval.
  • Sparse-observation extrapolation — reconstructing full-port FAS channel state from 5–10% observed ports — can slash pilot overhead, removing a main barrier to port-domain reconfiguration.
  • Structure-guided learning (KKT-embedded Transformers, deep-unfolded WMMSE) can beat both black-box learning and classical optimization in sum rate with millisecond inference, as reported for pinching-antenna systems.
  • A unified spatial-variable formulation of MA positions, FAS port states, and PA coordinates would enable transfer learning across architectures, reducing retraining cost for new deployments.
  • DRL and MARL can handle dynamic and distributed cases — UAV trajectories, cell-free networks, resilient operation — where repeated optimization is too slow.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the common-framework thesis holds, the next natural experiment is a single policy that controls a hybrid MA–FAS–PASS aperture; the paper lists hybrid architectures as a future direction but does not test them.
  • The reported gains are simulation-based; a measured-channel benchmark could show where the gap to fixed arrays shrinks once channel-estimation overhead, actuator delay, and switching energy are counted.
  • The energy cost of large AI backbones (LLMs) may cancel the energy savings of spatial reconfiguration; the paper flags this, implying lightweight models and accelerators are prerequisites, not optional.
  • Standardized control interfaces that expose antenna configuration as a programmable network resource would be the concrete route from this framework to deployment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper surveys AI-enabled design for three spatially reconfigurable antenna paradigms—movable antennas, fluid antenna systems, and pinching antenna systems—with a unified taxonomy organized by joint optimization problem (beamforming, channel estimation, ISAC, security, resource allocation, etc.). It summarizes the operating principles and standard channel models for each architecture, reviews a large body of recent learning-based works, compares the roles of DL/DRL/GNN/Transformer/LLM/KKT-guided methods, and closes with open challenges and future directions. The central claim, stated in Section I, is that AI is 'not merely an additional technique, but a common design framework for making spatial reconfigurability practical.'

Significance. The survey fills a genuine gap: prior surveys treat MA, FAS, or PASS separately, while this paper provides a side-by-side treatment of all three under a learning-oriented taxonomy. The channel models quoted in Eqs. (3)–(8), (15), and (19) are standard and appear correctly transcribed, and the summary tables (Tables IV–VIII) give a useful map of recent work. The manuscript is candid about many limitations, especially in Section VI.A.4, which flags the absence of measured datasets and the sim-to-real gap. If the result is taken as a survey of simulation-based AI research, it is a useful reference. However, the load-bearing framing that AI makes spatial reconfigurability 'practical' goes beyond what the surveyed evidence supports, because the evidence base is almost entirely simulation-based and the paper's own caveats undercut the deployability predicate.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section I vs. Section VI.A.4] The central claim that AI is 'a common design framework for making spatial reconfigurability practical' is not supported by the evidence assembled in the survey. Section VI.A.4 states that 'the limited availability of measured MA, FAS, and PASS datasets means that most policies are trained and evaluated using simulation models,' and Sections III.F, IV.F, and V.D repeat caveats about simplified channel models, perfect CSI, fixed dimensions, and offline training distributions. None of the cited works provides a hardware-validated counterexample. The 'practical' predicate should either be qualified to 'practical in simulation-based design' or the paper should add a dedicated assessment of hardware testbeds, measured channels, and deployment evidence. This is load-bearing because the Introduction's strongest claim rests on it.
  2. [Section II.D and Section VI.A.5] The paper argues that AI is 'indispensable' because MA/FAS/PASS problems are non-convex, high-dimensional, and time-varying. But it does not compare learned policies against strong classical solvers under equal computational budgets. The claim in Section II.D.a that SCA and AO are 'thwarted' without strong initialization is contradicted by works cited in the survey itself: [88] provides a robust AO solution for MA-enabled vehicular networks, and [12] presents an optimization-based algorithm with provable convergence to stationary points. Many numerical comparisons in Sections III–V use baselines such as FPA, random selection, or WMMSE with random positions, which do not establish that AI is necessary or superior to a well-initialized classical method. The 'necessity' framing should be softened to 'attractive practical/complexity-motivated alternative' unless the survey provides a systema
  3. [Tables IV–VIII and performance numbers in Sections III–V] The survey repeatedly reports specific numerical gains—e.g., 'from about 2.8 to about 3.5' in Section III.A, '4.23 bits/s/Hz' in Section III.A, '23.7%, 11.7%, and 9%' in Section V.B—without a common benchmark protocol. These numbers come from heterogeneous papers with different channel models, SNRs, system dimensions, and baseline definitions, so their aggregation is not evidence for a 'common design framework.' If the comparative claim is to be load-bearing, the survey should either state explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria for performance numbers, provide a uniform re-evaluation setup, or clearly mark these as illustrative single-paper results rather than cross-paper comparisons.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III.B] The paragraph describing [65] appears twice: the text after the [65] citation in Section III.B is essentially repeated verbatim later in the same subsection. Please remove the duplication.
  2. [Section II.C, Eq. (19)] Equation (19) contains a typo: 'where where q_{w,m} and u_k denote...' should read 'where q_{w,m} and u_k denote...'.
  3. [Throughout] The manuscript has several spacing and capitalization inconsistencies: 'UA V' should be 'UAV', 'accross' should be 'across', 'Section' is sometimes capitalized and sometimes not, and 'PASSs' is used as a plural in some places. A copyedit pass would improve readability.
  4. [Section I and References] The reference list relies heavily on arXiv preprints and very recent '2026' papers. For a survey, it would be helpful to mark which results are peer-reviewed and to note the preprint status more systematically, so readers can gauge maturity.
  5. [Table III] The 'Representative work' row in Table III cites only a few references per architecture; consider adding cross-references to the corresponding summary tables (Tables IV–VIII) for traceability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Survey with no derived predictions; self-citations present but not load-bearing; simulation-data limitations are acknowledged, not circular.

full rationale

This is a survey/tutorial paper, not a derivation-driven research paper. It introduces no new optimization problem, fits no parameters to data, and makes no quantitative prediction that could reduce to its inputs by construction. The central claim that AI is 'not merely an additional technique, but a common design framework for making spatial reconfigurability practical' is a taxonomical and expository claim, supported by a literature review with external benchmarks in Tables IV–VIII, rather than by a chain of equations or fitted parameters. Self-citations appear (e.g., refs [1]–[5], [14]–[16], [49], [139]–[144]), but they are used for background context, waveform-related extensions, and cell-free examples; none is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the survey's framework. The paper itself flags the main weakness in Section VI.A.4: 'the limited availability of measured MA, FAS, and PASS datasets means that most policies are trained and evaluated using simulation models,' and the lessons-learned sections repeat concerns about simplified channel models, perfect CSI assumptions, and offline training distributions. These are honest limitations affecting the strength of the 'practical' claim, but they are not circularity: the survey does not attempt to derive deployability from assumptions that already assert deployability. No circular step can be exhibited, so no significant circularity is found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review; no parameters are fitted and no entities are invented. The axioms above are background modeling choices the review adopts from the cited literature to explain the three systems. None of these axioms is derived in this paper.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Spatial configuration is a common optimization dimension across MA, FAS, and PASS sufficient for unified treatment.
    Section II presents the three architectures under one framework with different control variables; the survey's comparability claim depends on this.
  • domain assumption AI can learn effective near-optimal policies for high-dimensional, non-convex, mixed discrete-continuous problems.
    Section II.D asserts this; no convergence or optimality guarantee is proven in the survey.
  • domain assumption PASS channels can be modeled with a lossless-waveguide approximation and effective refractive index n_eff ≈ sqrt(epsilon_r).
    Equation (19) and surrounding text: 'The model follows a lossless-waveguide approximation'; inherited from cited [12].
  • domain assumption FAS port correlation follows Clarke's isotropic scattering model with J0 Bessel correlation.
    Equation (15) assumes rich isotropic scattering and uniformly spaced ports; acknowledged as approximate.
  • domain assumption MA channel can be represented by field-response matrices with planar-wave multipath components.
    Equations (3)-(8), presented as the standard MA model from [7], [8]; the survey uses it in the fundamentals.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 46817 in / 13370 out tokens · 130294 ms · 2026-08-04T00:53:11.179332+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks have moved beyond fixed-array designs toward antenna architectures that can adapt their spatial configuration to specific environmental conditions. Movable antenna, fluid antenna, and pinching antenna systems represent this principle in different ways, but they share a common vision: exploiting spatial flexibility as an additional degree of freedom (DoF) to improve communication, sensing, security, and resource efficiency. These new techniques, however, also bring challenging problems, as antenna configuration must be jointly considered with channel acquisition, beamforming, mobility, and network resource management. Therefore, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important tool for learning fast and adaptive control policies for these highly coupled systems. In this survey, we provide a unified review of AI for spatially reconfigurable antenna systems. We first introduce the basic principles of movable, fluid, and pinching antennas, which is followed by a summary of the latest AI-enabled designs according to their primary optimization objectives. Furthermore, we compare the roles of deep learning (DL), deep reinforcement learning (DRL), multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), graph learning, Transformers, large language models (LLMs), and structure-guided learning across different antenna architectures. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions toward scalable, robust, and hardware-aware intelligent reconfigurable antenna networks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00255 by Bo Ma, Dong In Kim, Jie Cao, Min Xu, Nguyen Cong Luong, Nguyen Duc Hai, Qiushi Zhao, Shaohan Feng, Thai-Hoc Vu, Thuan Van Le, Xunyang Zhan, Yonghong Zeng, Zeping Sui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of multi-agent DRL for joint beamforming and movable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: MA-assisted multiuser communication systems [67] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two-stage optimization scheme for MA-aided A2G communication [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: AI for Joint Port Selection and User Admission in Fluid Antenna [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of a DL-driven spatio-temporal estimator: a) encoder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Graph representation of the considered system and the architecture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of the LLM-enabled general learning framework in [26]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Multi-functional chirp signalling for next-generation multi-carrier wireless networks: Communications, sensing and ISAC perspectives,

    Z. Suiet al., “Multi-functional chirp signalling for next-generation multi-carrier wireless networks: Communications, sensing and ISAC perspectives,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06022, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Chirp-based OCDM and AFDM waveforms for 6G and beyond: Principles, recent advances, and future opportunities,

    Q. Luoet al., “Chirp-based OCDM and AFDM waveforms for 6G and beyond: Principles, recent advances, and future opportunities,” Authorea, vol. 2026, no. 0218, 2026. [Online]. Available: https: //www.authorea.com/doi/abs/10.22541/au.177145233.37871971/v1

    arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    AFDM: Evolving OFDM towards 6G+,

    H. S. Rouet al., “AFDM: Evolving OFDM towards 6G+,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08163, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Robust direct posi- tion determination for chirp signal-based underwater acoustic sensor networks,

    W. Wang, S. Yan, L. Mao, Z. Sui, and J. Yang, “Robust direct posi- tion determination for chirp signal-based underwater acoustic sensor networks,”Signal Processing, vol. 230, p. 109841, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Ambiguity-free broadband DOA estimation relying on parameterized time-frequency transform,

    W. Wang, S. Yan, L. Mao, Z. Sui, and J. Yang, “Ambiguity-free broadband DOA estimation relying on parameterized time-frequency transform,”IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Learning to jointly optimize antenna positioning and beamforming for movable antenna-aided systems,

    Y . Wang, Y . Li, Z. Ren, J. Lei, Y .-C. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Learning to jointly optimize antenna positioning and beamforming for movable antenna-aided systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.16449, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Two-timescale deep optimization of positioning and beamforming in movable antenna arrays,

    F. Liang, Y . Cai, A. Liu, and B. Champagne, “Two-timescale deep optimization of positioning and beamforming in movable antenna arrays,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 14 242–14 258, 2026

    2026

  8. [8]

    Learning-based joint beamforming and antenna movement design for movable antenna systems,

    C. Weng, Y . Chen, L. Zhu, and Y . Wang, “Learning-based joint beamforming and antenna movement design for movable antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2120–2124, Aug 2024

    2024

  9. [9]

    Hybrid near-far field 6D movable antenna design exploiting directional sparsity and deep learning,

    X. Shao, L. Hu, Y . Sun, X. Li, Y . Zhang, J. Ding, X. Shi, F. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “Hybrid near-far field 6D movable antenna design exploiting directional sparsity and deep learning,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 3736–3749, Sep 2026

    2026

  10. [10]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, C. Wang, F. R. Ghadi, J. Zhang, J. Rao, R. Murch, P. Ramírez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenezet al., “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325–2377, Aug 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    AI- empowered fluid antenna systems: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions,

    C. Wang, Z. Li, K.-K. Wong, R. Murch, C.-B. Chae, and S. Jin, “AI- empowered fluid antenna systems: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 34–41, Oct 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    Joint transmit and pinching beamforming for pinching antenna system (PASS): Optimization-based or learning-based?

    X. Xu, X. Mu, Y . Liu, and A. Nallanathan, “Joint transmit and pinching beamforming for pinching antenna system (PASS): Optimization-based or learning-based?”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 11 449–11 464, 2026

    2026

  13. [13]

    Graph neural network enabled pinching antennas,

    X. Xie, Y . Lu, and Z. Ding, “Graph neural network enabled pinching antennas,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2982–2986, Sep 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    RIS-assisted cell-free massive MIMO relying on reflection pattern modulation,

    Z. Sui, H. Q. Ngo, T. Van Chien, M. Matthaiou, and L. Hanzo, “RIS-assisted cell-free massive MIMO relying on reflection pattern modulation,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 968–982, Feb 2024. 28

    2024

  15. [15]

    STAR-RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO with imperfect hardware,

    Z. Sui, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, “STAR-RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO with imperfect hardware,” inProc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 2024, pp. 5259–5264

    2024

  16. [16]

    Performance analysis and optimization of STAR-RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO sys- tems relying on imperfect hardware,

    Z. Sui, H. Q. Ngo, M. Matthaiou, and L. Hanzo, “Performance analysis and optimization of STAR-RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO sys- tems relying on imperfect hardware,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2925–2939, Apr 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Opportunistic fluid antenna multiple access via team-inspired rein- forcement learning,

    N. Waqar, K.-K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, R. Murch, S. Jin, and A. Sharples, “Opportunistic fluid antenna multiple access via team-inspired rein- forcement learning,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 12 068–12 083, Sep 2024

    2024

  18. [18]

    Learning-induced channel extrapolation for fluid antenna systems using asymmetric graph masked autoencoder,

    H. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Wang, C.-C. Wang, K.-K. Wong, B. Wang, and C.-B. Chae, “Learning-induced channel extrapolation for fluid antenna systems using asymmetric graph masked autoencoder,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1665–1669, Jun 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    Taaformer: Transposed angular attention for channel estimation with fluid anten- nas,

    W. Zhao, Y . Miao, M. Liu, X. Liang, D. Hu, and Y . Zhu, “Taaformer: Transposed angular attention for channel estimation with fluid anten- nas,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 12, pp. 7338–7352, 2026

    2026

  20. [20]

    LLM-based port selection and beamforming for multiuser MISO with fluid antenna systems,

    W. Guo, K. Liang, G. Zheng, X. Chu, G. Zhou, K.-K. Wong, and C.- B. Chae, “LLM-based port selection and beamforming for multiuser MISO with fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, pp. 4026–4042, 2025

    2025

  21. [21]

    Graph neural network enabled fluid antenna systems: A two-stage approach,

    C. He, Y . Lu, W. Chen, B. Ai, K.-K. Wong, and D. Niyato, “Graph neural network enabled fluid antenna systems: A two-stage approach,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 16 625–16 629, Oct. 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Campass-net: A deep learning framework on capacity maximization for MIMO pinching antenna systems in IoT,

    J.-M. Kang, S. Yun, and I.-M. Kim, “Campass-net: A deep learning framework on capacity maximization for MIMO pinching antenna systems in IoT,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 45 917– 45 920, Nov. 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    A graph neural network for learning beamforming in pinching antenna systems (PASS),

    J. Guo, Y . Liu, and A. Nallanathan, “A graph neural network for learning beamforming in pinching antenna systems (PASS),”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3962–3966, Dec 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Channel estimation for pinching-antenna systems (PASS),

    J. Xiao, J. Wang, and Y . Liu, “Channel estimation for pinching-antenna systems (PASS),”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1789–1793, Aug 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Deep learning-driven time- varying fading channel estimation for pinching antenna systems,

    S. Lv, T. Liu, R. Yang, M. Li, and Y . Liu, “Deep learning-driven time- varying fading channel estimation for pinching antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 2569–2573, 2026

    2026

  26. [26]

    LLM-enabled antenna partitioning and beamforming optimization for segmented pinching,

    Q. Gao, R. Zhong, H. Shin, and Y . Liu, “LLM-enabled antenna partitioning and beamforming optimization for segmented pinching,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.10372, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Movable antennas for wireless communication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless communication: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, W. Mei, Y . Zeng, Q. Wu, B. Ning, Z. Xiao, X. Shao, J. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 28, pp. 3002–3054, 2026

    2026

  29. [29]

    Pinching- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, C. Ouyang, X. Xu, and Z. Ding, “Pinching- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 190–196, Jan. 2026

    2026

  30. [30]

    Pinching antennas: Principles, appli- cations and challenges,

    Z. Yang, N. Wang, Y . Sun, Z. Ding, R. Schober, G. K. Karagiannidis, V . W. Wong, and O. A. Dobre, “Pinching antennas: Principles, appli- cations and challenges,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 175–184, Apr 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    Reconfigurable antennas for next-generation mobile communication networks: A comprehensive survey and tutorial,

    Y . Zhao, L. Zhang, H. Yang, K. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Song, and Y . Liu, “Reconfigurable antennas for next-generation mobile communication networks: A comprehensive survey and tutorial,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 28, pp. 5267–5306, 2026

    2026

  32. [32]

    Advanced deep learning models for 6G: Overview, opportunities, and challenges,

    L. Jiao, Y . Shao, L. Sun, F. Liu, S. Yang, W. Ma, L. Li, X. Liu, B. Hou, X. Zhanget al., “Advanced deep learning models for 6G: Overview, opportunities, and challenges,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 133 245–133 314, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Agentic graph neural networks for wireless communications and networking towards edge general intelligence: A survey,

    Y . Lu, S. Zhang, C. Liu, R. Zhang, B. Ai, D. Niyato, W. Ni, X. Wang, and A. Jamalipour, “Agentic graph neural networks for wireless communications and networking towards edge general intelligence: A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 28, pp. 4519–4554, 2026

    2026

  34. [34]

    AI reasoning for wireless communications and networking: A survey and perspectives,

    H. Luo, Y . Yan, Y . Bian, W. Feng, R. Zhang, Y . Liu, J. Wang, G. Sun, D. Niyato, H. Yuet al., “AI reasoning for wireless communications and networking: A survey and perspectives,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 58, no. 13, pp. 1–38, Oct. 2026

    2026

  35. [35]

    Generative AI for the optimization of next-generation wireless networks: Basics, state-of-the-art, and open challenges,

    F. Khoramnejad and E. Hossain, “Generative AI for the optimization of next-generation wireless networks: Basics, state-of-the-art, and open challenges,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 3483– 3525, Dec. 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Deep reinforcement learning for pixel-based movable antenna control in a LEO satellite system,

    R. Huang, J. Si, Z. Li, Z. Cheng, B. Deng, and J. Wang, “Deep reinforcement learning for pixel-based movable antenna control in a LEO satellite system,” inProc. IEEE Ucom, 2025, pp. 192–197

    2025

  37. [37]

    Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,”IEEE Trans- actions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, June 2024

    2024

  38. [38]

    Two-timescale deep- unfolding for joint optimization of antenna position and beamforming in movable-antenna arrays,

    F. Liang, Y . Cai, A. Liu, and B. Champagne, “Two-timescale deep- unfolding for joint optimization of antenna position and beamforming in movable-antenna arrays,” inProc. IEEE ICC, 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  39. [39]

    Effective rank analysis and optimization of flex- ible antenna-enabled wireless systems: Movable antennas or pinching antennas?

    C. Yang and D. Li, “Effective rank analysis and optimization of flex- ible antenna-enabled wireless systems: Movable antennas or pinching antennas?”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20629, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    En- hancing comp-RSMA performance with movable antennas: A meta- learning optimization framework,

    A. Amhaz, S. Khisa, M. Elhattab, C. Assi, and S. Sharafeddine, “En- hancing comp-RSMA performance with movable antennas: A meta- learning optimization framework,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 3802–3813, 2026

    2026

  41. [41]

    Optimizing downlink C-NOMA transmission with movable antennas: A DDPG- based approach,

    A. Amhaz, M. Elhattab, C. Assi, and S. Sharafeddine, “Optimizing downlink C-NOMA transmission with movable antennas: A DDPG- based approach,” inProc. IEEE PIMRC, 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  42. [42]

    Movable antenna SWIPT systems with STAR-RIS: A meta DRL approach,

    M. Amiri, A. Mohammadzadeh, F. Zeinali, M. R. Mili, M. B. Mash- hadi, and P. Xiao, “Movable antenna SWIPT systems with STAR-RIS: A meta DRL approach,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 6864–6869, Apr 2026

    2026

  43. [43]

    Movable-antenna-assisted covert communications with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    W. Xie, Z. Li, C. Yu, H. Xu, J. Wang, W. Wu, X. Li, and L. Yang, “Movable-antenna-assisted covert communications with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 12 369– 12 382, May 2025

    2025

  44. [44]

    Robust optimization for movable antenna-aided cell- free ISAC with time synchronization errors,

    Y . Xiu, Y . Zhao, R. Yang, W. Lyu, D. Niyato, D. I. Kim, G. Liu, and N. Wei, “Robust optimization for movable antenna-aided cell- free ISAC with time synchronization errors,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 10 082–10 097, Jan 2026

    2026

  45. [45]

    Movable antenna-aided cooperative ISAC network with time synchronization error and imperfect CSI,

    Y . Xiu, Y . Zhao, R. Yang, D. Niyato, J. Jin, Q. Wang, G. Liu, and N. Wei, “Movable antenna-aided cooperative ISAC network with time synchronization error and imperfect CSI,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 2968–2983, Dec 2026

    2026

  46. [46]

    Meta-reinforcement learning optimization for movable antenna-aided full-duplex CF-DFRC systems with carrier frequency offset,

    Y . Xiu, W. Lyu, Y . Li, R. Yang, P. L. Yeoh, W. Zhang, G. Liu, and N. Wei, “Meta-reinforcement learning optimization for movable antenna-aided full-duplex CF-DFRC systems with carrier frequency offset,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 5803–5819, 2026

    2026

  47. [47]

    Unsupervised learning for optimization in movable antenna-enabled integrated sensing and communications,

    Z. Wang, G. Zhang, H. Xu, and X. He, “Unsupervised learning for optimization in movable antenna-enabled integrated sensing and communications,” inProc. IEEE ICICN, 2025, pp. 81–84

    2025

  48. [48]

    Crosstalk-resilient beamforming for movable antenna enabled integrated sensing and communication,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Xiu, Z. Dong, J. Yin, M. J. Khabbaz, C. Assi, and N. Wei, “Crosstalk-resilient beamforming for movable antenna enabled integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 1–16, 2026

    2026

  49. [49]

    Beamforming design for physical security in movable antenna- aided ISAC systems: A reinforcement learning approach,

    H. Le Hung, N. H. Huy, N. C. Luong, Q.-V . Pham, D. Niyato, and N. T. Hoa, “Beamforming design for physical security in movable antenna- aided ISAC systems: A reinforcement learning approach,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 18 163–18 167, Nov. 2025

    2025

  50. [50]

    Moving or predicting? RoleAware-MAPP: A role- aware transformer framework for movable antenna position prediction to secure wireless communications,

    W. Wang, X. Liu, W. Gong, Y . Zhao, Z. Jiang, K. Li, Q. Zhang, Z. Feng, and K. Yu, “Moving or predicting? RoleAware-MAPP: A role- aware transformer framework for movable antenna position prediction to secure wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 5519–5533, Mar 2026

    2026

  51. [51]

    Can movable antenna-enabled micro-mobility replace UA V-enabled macro- mobility? a physical layer security perspective,

    K. Li, K. Yu, D. Ma, Y . Zhao, X. Liu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Feng, “Can movable antenna-enabled micro-mobility replace UA V-enabled macro- mobility? a physical layer security perspective,”IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 4317–4330, Mar. 2026

    2026

  52. [52]

    Deep learning- assisted jamming mitigation with movable antenna array,

    X. Tang, Y . Jiang, J. Liu, Q. Du, D. Niyato, and Z. Han, “Deep learning- assisted jamming mitigation with movable antenna array,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 14 865–14 870, Sep. 2025

    2025

  53. [53]

    Movable antenna array design for jamming mitigation,

    Y . Guo, J. Luo, Y . Sun, Z. Lin, and S. Wang, “Movable antenna array design for jamming mitigation,” inProc. IEEE ICC, 2025, pp. 19–25

    2025

  54. [54]

    Deep learning enabled slow fluid antenna multiple access,

    N. Waqar, K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, A. Sharples, and Y . Zhang, “Deep learning enabled slow fluid antenna multiple access,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 861–865, Mar 2023

    2023

  55. [55]

    Switching-cost-aware deep reinforcement learning for dynamic port selection in fluid antenna systems,

    J. Liu, K. Liang, L. Zhao, G. Zheng, H. Gu, K.-K. Wong, and C.-B. Chae, “Switching-cost-aware deep reinforcement learning for dynamic port selection in fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 30, pp. 1548–1552, 2026

    2026

  56. [56]

    Beamforming for pinching antenna systems (PASS): KKT-guided large model learning,

    X. Xu, Y . Liu, X. Mu, D. Gan, and A. Nallanathan, “Beamforming for pinching antenna systems (PASS): KKT-guided large model learning,” inProc. IEEE/CIC ICCC, 2025, pp. 1–6. 29

    2025

  57. [57]

    Deep learning optimization of two- state pinching antennas systems,

    O. G. Karagiannidis, V . E. Galanopoulou, P. D. Diamantoulakis, Z. Ding, and O. A. Dobre, “Deep learning optimization of two- state pinching antennas systems,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 12, pp. 4942–4956, 2025

    2025

  58. [58]

    Straggler-resilient federated learning over a hybrid conventional and pinching antenna network,

    B. Wu, F. Fang, M. Zeng, and X. Wang, “Straggler-resilient federated learning over a hybrid conventional and pinching antenna network,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2026

    2026

  59. [59]

    Joint antenna position and transmit power optimization for pinching antenna-assisted ISAC systems,

    Y . Qin, Y . Fu, and H. Zhang, “Joint antenna position and transmit power optimization for pinching antenna-assisted ISAC systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3535–3539, Nov. 2025

    2025

  60. [60]

    Integrated sensing and communication for segmented waveguide-enabled pinching antenna systems,

    Q. Gao, R. Zhong, H. Shin, and Y . Liu, “Integrated sensing and communication for segmented waveguide-enabled pinching antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20658, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Pinching antenna system (PASS) enhanced covert communications: Against warden via sensing,

    H. Jiang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu, A. Nallanathan, and Z. Ding, “Pinching antenna system (PASS) enhanced covert communications: Against warden via sensing,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 4254– 4270, 2026

    2026

  62. [62]

    LLM-driven design for fluid antenna systems,

    C. Wang, B. Zhang, Z. Li, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, G. Zheng, and C.-B. Chae, “LLM-driven design for fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 1065–1069, 2025

    2025

  63. [63]

    Reinforcement learning for channel state information acqui- sition in movable antenna,

    J. Choi, “Reinforcement learning for channel state information acqui- sition in movable antenna,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 1–1, Jan 2026

    2026

  64. [64]

    Ssnet: Flexible and robust channel extrapolation for fluid antenna systems enabled by an self-supervised learning framework,

    Y . Gao, Y . Liu, R. Yu, S. Liu, Y . Jin, S. Zhang, S. Xu, and X. Chu, “Ssnet: Flexible and robust channel extrapolation for fluid antenna systems enabled by an self-supervised learning framework,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 1276–1289, 2026

    2026

  65. [65]

    Learning- based movable-antenna position optimization with implicit CSI,

    L. Lu, W. Mei, X. Wei, H. Hua, Z. Chen, and B. Ning, “Learning- based movable-antenna position optimization with implicit CSI,” in Proc. IEEE PIMRC, 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  66. [66]

    Joint optimization in pinching-antenna-assisted NOMA-MEC systems via DRL,

    Y . Ma, W. Huang, Z. Ding, D. K. So, and V . Bhatia, “Joint optimization in pinching-antenna-assisted NOMA-MEC systems via DRL,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 2493–2497, 2026

    2026

  67. [67]

    Deep learning based channel estimation and beamforming in movable antenna systems,

    K. Feng, Z. Wan, A. Liao, W. Ma, L. Zhu, Z. Xiao, Z. Gao, and R. Zhang, “Deep learning based channel estimation and beamforming in movable antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.07870, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Deep learning enabled multicast beamforming with movable antenna array,

    J.-M. Kang, “Deep learning enabled multicast beamforming with movable antenna array,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1848–1852, Jul 2024

    2024

  69. [69]

    Deep learning for movable antenna precoding in 2D MISO communication system,

    C. Xie, Y . Xiu, S. Yang, and Z. Zhang, “Deep learning for movable antenna precoding in 2D MISO communication system,” inProc. IEEE ICCC, 2024, pp. 2500–2504

    2024

  70. [70]

    Deep learning method for movable antenna- enabled multiuser downlink system,

    D. Kim and S.-H. Park, “Deep learning method for movable antenna- enabled multiuser downlink system,” inProc. IEEE APCC, 2025, pp. 1–2

    2025

  71. [71]

    Movable cell-free massive MIMO for high-speed train communications: A PPO- based antenna position optimization,

    J. Dai, Y . Liu, J. Zheng, R. Zhang, J. Zhang, and B. Ai, “Movable cell-free massive MIMO for high-speed train communications: A PPO- based antenna position optimization,” inProc. IEEE ICC, 2025, pp. 38–43

    2025

  72. [72]

    Deep reinforce- ment learning for movable antenna-assisted cell-free networks,

    Q. Li, W. Wang, Y . Li, F. Yu, C. Zhang, and Y . Huang, “Deep reinforce- ment learning for movable antenna-assisted cell-free networks,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2783–2787, Sep 2025

    2025

  73. [73]

    NMAP-Net: Deep learning-aided near-field multi- beamforming design and antenna position optimization for XL-MIMO communications,

    J.-M. Kang, “NMAP-Net: Deep learning-aided near-field multi- beamforming design and antenna position optimization for XL-MIMO communications,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 18 397– 18 413, Jun. 2025

    2025

  74. [74]

    New view of learning-aided channel estimation for movable antenna systems,

    S. Jang and C. Lee, “New view of learning-aided channel estimation for movable antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 5694–5708, Jul. 2025

    2025

  75. [75]

    DRL-based antenna position optimization for MA-assisted OTFS system under imperfect CSI,

    M. Wang, Q. Zhang, Y . Zhao, X. Cheng, Z. Dong, D. Wang, and Y . L. Guan, “DRL-based antenna position optimization for MA-assisted OTFS system under imperfect CSI,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23611, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    Meta-learning-driven resource optimization in full-duplex ISAC with movable antennas,

    A. Amhaz, S. Khisa, M. Elhattab, C. Assi, and S. Sharafeddine, “Meta-learning-driven resource optimization in full-duplex ISAC with movable antennas,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 1603– 1607, 2026

    2026

  77. [77]

    A learning-based flexible beamforming method for movable antenna- enabled integrated sensing, communication and power transmission system,

    C. Xie, Y . Li, Q. Tu, Y . Xiu, S. Yang, Z. Hu, J. Jin, and Z. Zhang, “A learning-based flexible beamforming method for movable antenna- enabled integrated sensing, communication and power transmission system,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2043–2047, Sep 2025

    2043

  78. [78]

    Movable antenna-enabled secure transmission for active RIS-aided ISAC systems,

    H. Bian, F. Zhao, M. Chen, L. Liu, Y . Yao, H. Jiang, and F. Shu, “Movable antenna-enabled secure transmission for active RIS-aided ISAC systems,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, pp. 6325–6344, 2026

    2026

  79. [79]

    Distributed antenna selection and beamforming for ELAA based downlink ISAC systems,

    Q. Gao, R. Zhong, X. Mu, M. Peng, H. Shin, and Y . Liu, “Distributed antenna selection and beamforming for ELAA based downlink ISAC systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 17 865–17 878, Nov 2025

    2025

  80. [80]

    Movable antenna design for UA V-aided federated learning via deep reinforcement learn- ing,

    M. Ahmadzadeh, S. Pakravan, and G. A. Hodtani, “Movable antenna design for UA V-aided federated learning via deep reinforcement learn- ing,” inProc. IEEE IKT, 2024, pp. 91–95

    2024

Showing first 80 references.