Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 196 references

A fast competing transition that shares the upper level of an inverted maser transition does not, by itself, suppress maser amplification or transient superradiance; the response is set by the shared population reservoir, the initial cohere

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 00:43 UTC pith:SNTEICAT

load-bearing objection Three-level MBE setup is real, but the fast-leakage channel is so weakly coupled that the central claim is never actually tested. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00332 v1 pith:SNTEICAT submitted 2026-07-31 astro-ph.HE

Fast Population Leakage in Astronomical Masers: Maser Amplification and Transient Superradiance

Vahid Anari , Toktam Rashidi , Fereshteh Rajabi This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords maserssuperradianceMaxwell-Bloch equationsthree-level systempopulation inversionmethanol masersS255IR-NIRS3transient emission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether an inverted astronomical maser transition can still amplify or fire a superradiant burst when its upper level also feeds a second transition that decays much faster. Using a three-level (Lambda-type) Maxwell-Bloch model, it argues that a fast competing decay does not by itself kill the inverted transition: what matters is how much population sits in the shared upper level, how much coherence the inverted transition starts with, and how fast relaxation and dephasing act. In the mixed configuration studied, the fast pathway is non-inverted and acts as a leak; for small initial coherence in that path, its radiation stays weak while the inverted transition either amplifies a seed or builds macroscopic coherence and bursts. Applied to the 6.7 GHz methanol flare in S255IR-NIRS3, the model reproduces a transient-superradiance interpretation even when the much faster 239.7 GHz channel is included explicitly. The paper also shows that a larger inversion need not yield a stronger burst if it comes with a weaker coherence seed.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the spontaneous decay rate of a competing transition sharing the upper level is not the controlling parameter for whether an inverted transition amplifies or emits cooperatively. In the Lambda-type three-level system, the 3->2 transition is inverted while the faster 3->1 path is non-inverted and weakly coherent; rapid decay through 3->1 removes population from |3>, yet the 3->2 subsystem still either grows from a seed in the quasi-steady maser regime or develops macroscopic coherence and fires a transient superradiant burst. The response is governed by the shared upper-level reservoir (population ratios r1 and r2), the initial coherence fractions c31 and c32

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Lambda-type three-level Maxwell-Bloch model: three molecular levels with a shared upper state |3>, two dipole-allowed transitions 3->1 and 3->2 (the second inverted and observed), and a dipole-forbidden lower 1<->2 transition. Populations n_i, coherences R31, R32, R21, and field envelopes E1 and E2 propagate along a cylindrical sample in retarded time, with phenomenological relaxation and dephasing timescales. The model separates population leakage from coherence loss: initial conditions are set by population ratios r1 and r2 and coherence fractions c31 and c32, while the spectroscopic coupling ratio eta fixes the relative strength of the leak. Varying these pa

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the fast 3->1 pathway can be represented as an independent relaxation of the population difference n31 with an adjustable timescale, rather than as the actual spontaneous decay Gamma31 of the shared upper level; in the S255IR-NIRS3 benchmark the leakage time is set to tau(1)_31 = 31 while the real spontaneous timescale is roughly 0.34 in the same units, and Gamma31 never drains the inverted population difference n32.

What would settle it

A simulation of the S255IR-NIRS3 flare with the leakage timescale set to its physical value (tau(1)_31 ~ 0.34, i.e. T(1)_31 ~ 1.8e4 s) and with Gamma31 added as a direct drain in the n32 equation: if no 6.7 GHz superradiant burst emerges, the paper's central claim is wrong. Similarly, an observation of 239.7 GHz emission during a flare at a level comparable to the 6.7 GHz burst would contradict the weak-leakage assumption.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Fast shared-upper-level decay should not be treated as a fundamental objection to maser amplification or superradiance in multilevel molecules; suppression occurs only when the leak removes enough population or when dephasing prevents coherence growth.
  • The distinction between quasi-steady maser emission and transient superradiance survives in the three-level system and is controlled mainly by the relaxation and dephasing times of the inverted 3->2 transition.
  • The 6.7 GHz methanol flare in S255IR-NIRS3 remains consistent with transient superradiance when the fast 239.7 GHz decay channel is modelled explicitly, with that channel staying orders of magnitude dimmer for small c31.
  • A larger population inversion on the observed transition does not necessarily produce a stronger or earlier superradiant burst, because the maximum initial coherence decreases with increasing r2.
  • Observational limits on the 239.7 GHz leakage emission translate into upper limits on the effective coherence c31 of the leak, and the r1-dependence of the flare profile can constrain the shared upper-level population reservoir.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open the direct test of replacing the phenomenological leakage relaxation with the measured spontaneous decay rate Gamma31 coupled into the n32 equation at the physical timescale (tau ~ 0.34 for S255IR-NIRS3); this is the most direct extension and could alter the conclusion.
  • The same Lambda-type treatment should transfer to OH maser transitions that share upper levels with faster decay paths, predicting that those faster shared-upper-level channels stay weak and that flare morphology depends on the upper-level reservoir; existing OH monitoring light curves could test this.
  • If a fast leakage channel ever acquires non-negligible coherence rather than the tiny fiducial c31 ~ 1e-10, the model implies it would light up without necessarily quenching the inverted transition; simultaneous observations of both lines during a flare would be a direct test.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Λ-type three-level Maxwell–Bloch model for astronomical masers in which the upper state of an inverted transition also decays through a faster competing radiative pathway. The authors study the 'mixed configuration' where the 3→1 pathway is non-inverted and acts as leakage while 3→2 is inverted. They report that rapid spontaneous decay through the competing pathway does not by itself suppress maser amplification or superradiance on the inverted transition, and they apply the model to the 6.7 GHz methanol flare in S255IR-NIRS3, concluding that a transient-superradiance interpretation remains compatible with the observed flare when the fast 239.7 GHz leakage is included.

Significance. If the central claim were established, it would strengthen the case for transient superradiance in astrophysical masers with shared-upper-level decay channels and would generalize previous two-level effective models. The paper also offers a potentially concrete benchmark with a real source. However, as shown below, the model as written does not actually implement the claimed fast spontaneous-decay leakage: the relevant rates never appear in the equations that govern the inverted population difference, and the key simulations either omit non-coherent processes entirely or use a leakage timescale about a hundred times too long. The numerical results therefore do not test the paper's central assertion. This is a load-bearing deficiency, not a cosmetic one.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (4)–(5), §2] The model does not include spontaneous decay of the shared upper level |3⟩. In the physical Λ system described in the text, a spontaneous transition 3→1 at rate Γ31 changes n31 by −2Γ31 n3 and n32 by −Γ31 n3, because n3 decreases and n1 increases while n2 is unaffected. Equation (5) for n32 contains no such term; the only coupling of the 3→1 channel to the inverted transition is the coherent term Re(1/2 E1* R31), which is made negligible by setting c31=10^−10. The phenomenological term −(n31−n0_31)/τ(1)_31 drives n31 toward a reference value and acts as a source/sink of the population difference, not as a decay of n3. Consequently the fast leakage pathway is structurally prevented from draining the inversion n32. The central claim that fast spontaneous decay does not suppress 3→2 emission is therefore not tested by the present equations.
  2. [Figs. 2–3, §3.1–3.2] The main simulations that support the qualitative conclusions set all non-coherent relaxation and dephasing timescales to infinity (τ(1)_31=τ(2)_31=τ(1)_32=τ(2)_32=∞). In this limit the leakage channel has no population-relaxation or dephasing dynamics at all; only the initial population ratios and coherence fractions matter. These runs can at most show the behavior of a closed three-level system with a weakly seeded non-inverted transition. They do not address the advertised effect of rapid spontaneous decay through the competing pathway. To test the abstract's claim, the leakage must be implemented as a finite decay process that removes population from the shared upper level and thereby affects n32.
  3. [§3.4 and Fig. 6] The S255IR-NIRS3 benchmark uses τ(1)_31=31 in units of T0≈5.23×10^4 s. With the stated spontaneous decay rate Γ31=5.68×10^−5 Hz, the corresponding lifetime is 1/Γ31≈1.76×10^4 s, i.e. τ_sp≈0.34 in T0 units. The adopted value is about 90 times longer than the actual spontaneous lifetime. Moreover, this τ(1)_31 enters only the n31 relaxation equation; it does not appear in the n32 equation, so even the slow relaxation term does not drain the inverted transition. The comparison between the model curves and the observed 6.7 GHz flare therefore does not demonstrate that a fast leakage pathway leaves the superradiant response intact.
  4. [Appendix A] The derivation in Appendix A introduces phenomenological population relaxation and dephasing but no spontaneous-emission decay rates for the allowed transitions. The transition rates Γ31 and Γ32 are mentioned in the main text and in Fig. 5, but they never enter the dynamical equations. The model thus reduces the 'fast spontaneous decay' to a generic relaxation of the population difference n31, which is mathematically distinct from the physical process. This gap between the stated problem and the implemented equations is the root cause of the issues above.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (11)] The definition of η as |d31/d32|² (k31/k32) is correct, but the absolute value notation is slightly ambiguous for complex dipoles; it may be worth stating that d31 and d32 are taken as real effective scalar couplings.
  2. [Fig. 6 parameter box] The choice τ(1)_31=31 is not justified in the text. Given the stated Γ31, this value should be compared with the physical spontaneous lifetime; the discrepancy noted in the major comments should be addressed.
  3. [§3.4] The paper says that r1 'affects the morphology' of the flare but provides no quantitative goodness-of-fit measure (e.g., χ² or R²) for the curves in Fig. 6. Without such a metric, the claim that the model 'remains compatible' with the data is difficult to evaluate.
  4. [General] A few typographical issues: 'Λ-type' appears with a Greek capital at the start of the abstract; the vertical-scale labels in Figures 2 and 3 use a nonstandard notation '×10□22' whose placeholder appears corrupted; and the declaration of AI assistance is fine but could be integrated more cleanly into the acknowledgments.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The central leak claim is built into the equations: Eq. (5) has no Γ31 drain on n32, and the S255 benchmark tunes τ(1)_31=31 (~90× slower than the stated Γ31 lifetime) after reusing the earlier fitted pulse.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Eq. (5); Section 3.1; Abstract]
    "∂n32/∂τ = −Re( 1/2 E˜∗1 R31 + E˜∗2 R32 ) − (n32 − n0_32)/τ^(1)_32 (5) ... “We find that rapid spontaneous decay through the competing pathway does not, by itself, suppress maser amplification or superradiant emission from the inverted transition.” ... “In Sections 3.1 and 3.2, all non-coherent timescales are set to infinity, so that population restoration and coherence damping are absent.”"

    Eq. (5) contains no Γ31 n3 term, so spontaneous decay of the shared upper level never drains n32. The only 3→1 coupling in Eq. (5) is the coherent term Re(1/2 E˜1*R31), which the paper suppresses by setting c31=10^-10; in Figs. 2–3 all non-coherent timescales are infinite, so the leakage cannot act as a population sink at all. The abstract's conclusion that rapid spontaneous decay does not suppress the inverted transition is therefore identical to the construction of the equations: the “leakage” is modeled as a weakly coherent, non-draining relaxation of n31, not as Γ31 decay. The result is assumed, not derived.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.4, Fig. 6 parameter box; Abstract]
    "Consistent with the earlier two-level MBE modelling of the 6.7 GHz flare by Rajabi et al. (2019), we retain r2=2.33×10^19 and c32=1 ... while adding a weakly coherent leakage pathway with c31=10^−10. The non-coherent timescales are expressed in units of T0≃5.23×10^4 s and are chosen to be shorter for the 3→1 pathway than for the inverted transition. (Fig. 6: τ(1)_31=31) ... The calculated flare remains compatible with a transient-superradiance interpretation when this fast leakage pathway is included explicitly."

    The S255 benchmark is presented as a test of whether the previously proposed superradiance interpretation survives when the fast 239.7 GHz channel is included explicitly, but it imports the earlier two-level fit's r2, c32 and the same pump pulse, then tunes r1 and timescales to the flare. The chosen τ(1)_31=31 is ~90× longer than the lifetime implied by the stated Γ31=5.68×10^-5 Hz (≈1.76×10^4 s ≈0.34 T0), and Γ31 still does not appear in Eq. (5). The computed agreement with Szymczak et al. data is therefore a post-fit consistency check of reused and adjusted inputs, not an independent prediction that fast spontaneous decay was included.

full rationale

The generic Maxwell–Bloch scans in Figs. 2–4 are self-contained numerical experiments: the equations are explicit, no external theorem is invoked, and the qualitative dependence on the population reservoir and coherence seeds is internally consistent. Those scans are not circular in themselves. However, the paper's central physical claim goes beyond the scans: it asserts that “rapid spontaneous decay” through the 3→1 pathway does not suppress 3→2 emission. That claim is not derived from the equations; it is assumed by Eq. (5), which contains no Γ31 n3 decay term and couples to the leakage only through a coherence term deliberately set to c31=10^-10. In the all-τ=∞ runs the leakage is entirely inert as a population channel, and Appendix A likewise contains only relaxation of population differences rather than spontaneous-emission rates. The S255 benchmark compounds this by reusing the previous two-level fit as input, choosing τ(1)_31=31 even though the stated Γ31 implies τ≈0.34, and then declaring the flare “remains compatible.” The result is a consistency check of fitted inputs rather than a prediction that the fast leakage pathway was included. I therefore flag two construction-level reductions, while noting that this is partial rather than total circularity: the generic scans still contain independent numerical content outside the leakage claim, and the self-citations are transparent rather than a hidden uniqueness chain. Score 6 reflects one or more central claims reducing to model construction, without reaching the point where the entire derivation is equivalent to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new physical entities, but it carries many free parameters. The most consequential are the initial coherence fractions c31 and c32 and the non-coherent timescales: they determine whether leakage is weak and whether a superradiant burst occurs, and in the benchmark they are adjusted rather than derived from the stated Γ values.

free parameters (6)
  • r1 = n3^0/n1^0 = 0.79, 0.89, 0.94 in S255 runs; varied in scans
    Sets the shared upper-level reservoir; in the benchmark it is tuned to match the observed flare morphology (Sec. 3.4, Fig. 6).
  • r2 = n3^0/n2^0 = 2.33×10^19 in S255 runs
    Carried over from the authors' two-level fit (Rajabi et al. 2019); sets the very strong inversion and the maximum initial coherence via Rmax32 (Eq. 23).
  • c31 (initial coherence fraction on leakage path) = 10^-10 in most runs
    Chosen ad hoc to represent a weakly coherent, approximately thermalized 3→1 path; directly controls the weakness of the leakage output (Sec. 3.2).
  • c32 (initial coherence fraction on maser transition) = 1 in most runs
    Maximal initial coherence; primary seed for the superradiant burst. Adopted from prior two-level modelling, not derived from spectroscopy (Sec. 3.2, 3.4).
  • tau(1)_31, tau(2)_31, tau(1)_32, tau(2)_32 = 31, 3, 313, 30 in S255 runs
    Phenomenological non-coherent relaxation/dephasing timescales; not tied to the stated spontaneous decay rates (Γ31/Γ32) and not matched to the four-orders-of-magnitude ratio (Sec. 3.3, 3.4).
  • Pump pulse amplitude/duration (Λ1_dim, Tp, τ0) = 2.6×10^-19 cm^-3 s^-1, 8.1×10^6 s
    Taken unchanged from the earlier two-level fit (Rajabi et al. 2019); used to drive the S255 flare (Eq. 25).
axioms (6)
  • standard math Rotating-wave and slowly varying envelope approximations for resonant fields
    Used to obtain Eqs. (4)–(10) from Appendix A; standard in MBE treatments.
  • domain assumption Fresnel number F32≈1, so a 1D plane-wave model is sufficient
    Invoked in Sec. 2 to justify 1D propagation; not validated for the S255 geometry.
  • ad hoc to paper Phenomenological relaxation drives n31 and n32 independently toward reference values n0_31, n0_32
    This encodes pump/loss but decouples the fast spontaneous decay Γ31 from the n32 equation; key to why leakage appears not to suppress the burst (Eqs. 4–5).
  • standard math Initial coherences bounded by Cauchy–Schwarz and c21=0
    Eq. (15); used to set initial coherence seeds.
  • domain assumption Mixed configuration r1<1<r2 corresponds to Class II methanol and OH maser systems
    Justifies studying only the mixed configuration (Eq. 19).
  • ad hoc to paper Pump pulse Λ̃(τ) is added only to the n32 equation (Eq. 25)
    The flare is initiated by this source term; its form and parameters come from the earlier two-level fit.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16843 in / 22076 out tokens · 191709 ms · 2026-08-04T00:43:03.087800+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We use a $\Lambda$-type three-level Maxwell--Bloch model to test whether an inverted molecular transition in an astronomical maser source can produce maser amplification or superradiance when its upper level also decays through a second radiative pathway with a much larger spontaneous decay rate. Such shared-upper-level configurations occur in multilevel, radiatively pumped molecules, including Class II methanol masers and several OH maser transitions. The model follows the coupled evolution of level populations, molecular coherences, radiation fields, and phenomenological relaxation and dephasing, separating population leakage from coherence loss. We focus on the mixed configuration in which the observed transition is inverted while the faster pathway is non-inverted and acts as a leakage channel. We find that rapid spontaneous decay through the competing pathway does not, by itself, suppress maser amplification or superradiant emission from the inverted transition. The response is controlled by the shared upper-level population reservoir, the available initial coherence, and the relaxation and dephasing timescales. For small effective coherence in the leakage pathway, its radiative output remains weak, while the inverted transition either amplifies a seed field in the quasi-steady maser regime or develops macroscopic coherence and produces a transient superradiant burst. A larger inversion does not necessarily produce a stronger burst if it is accompanied by a weaker initial coherence seed. As a benchmark, we apply the model to the 6.7 GHz methanol flare in S255IR-NIRS3, whose upper level also decays through the 239.7 GHz transition at a spontaneous rate more than four orders of magnitude larger. The calculated flare remains compatible with a transient-superradiance interpretation when this fast leakage pathway is included explicitly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00332 by Fereshteh Rajabi, Toktam Rashidi, Vahid Anari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Level notation for the Λ-type three-level model. The transitions 3 → 1 and 3 → 2 are dipole allowed and are coupled to the field envelopes E1 and E2, respectively, while the 1 ↔ 2 transition is taken to be dipole forbidden. The level spacings are schematic and not to scale. 2. Three-level Maxwell–Bloch model We specify the three-level Maxwell–Bloch model associated with the notation in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Population-ratio dependence of the scaled output intensities in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Initial-coherence dependence of the scaled output intensities in the two radiative channels. The intensities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effect of non-coherent relaxation and dephasing in the inverted 3 → 2 subsystem. The scaled output intensities, ˜I31(1, τ) and ˜I32(1, τ), are shown as functions of the scaled retarded time τ at the output end of the sample, ξ = 1. In both panels, η = 1, the non-coherent timescales of the 3 → 1 leakage pathway satisfy Eq. (20), and all remaining parameters are listed in the boxes. Panel (a) varies the 3 → … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Methanol level structure used for the three-level MBE model of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Three-level MBE modelling of the 6.7 GHz methanol flare in S255IR-NIRS3 for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

196 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2015, , 579, A101

    Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, , 579, A101

    2015

  2. [2]

    , year =

    Tanabe, Yoshihiro and Yonekura, Yoshinori and MacLeod, Gordon C , title = ". , year =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psad002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psad002

  3. [3]

    Calculations using a new ab initio potential surface

    Rotationally inelastic and hyperfine resolved cross sections for OH-H _ 2 collisions. Calculations using a new ab initio potential surface. , year = 1994, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1063/1.466950 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1063/1.466950 1994

  4. [4]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Modelling methanol and hydroxyl masers in star-forming regions , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Generalization of the Menegozzi and Lamb maser algorithm to the transient superradiance regime. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2222 , archivePrefix =. 2108.01164 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01523 , year=

    Transient structure in the non-linear superradiance regime of widely Doppler broadened media , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01523 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    The Hitachi and Takahagi 32 m radio telescopes: Upgrade of the antennas from satellite communication to radio astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psw045 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw045

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Engineering and science highlights of the KAT-7 radio telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1040 , archivePrefix =. 1606.02929 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Massive Star Formation in the Hot, Dense Cloud Core of G9.62+0.19. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/176975 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/176975

  10. [10]

    Trigonometric Parallaxes of Massive Star-Forming Regions. VII. G9.62+0.20 and the Expanding 3 kpc ARM. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/464 , archivePrefix =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/1/464

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Positions of hydroxyl masers at 1665 and 1667 MHz. , keywords =

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Periodic class II methanol masers in G9.62+0.20E. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15147.x , archivePrefix =. 0906.0876 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2009

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Periodic variability of the mainline hydroxyl masers in G9.62+0.20E. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz767 , archivePrefix =. 1903.05178 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of periodic and alternating flares of the methanol and water masers in G107.298+5.639. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw044 , archivePrefix =. 1604.00796 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    J0158+ 65 , author=

    Multiwavelength Radio Observations of Two Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources: FRB 121102 and FRB 180916. J0158+ 65 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13559 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    J0422+ 73: Ten-year Fermi-LAT Upper Limits and Implications , author=

    Second Repeating FRB 180814. J0422+ 73: Ten-year Fermi-LAT Upper Limits and Implications , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    The FRB 121102 Host Is Atypical among Nearby Fast Radio Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3e41 , archivePrefix =. 1906.08749 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Detection of Repeating FRB 180916.J0158+65 Down to Frequencies of 300 MHz. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab96bf , archivePrefix =. 2004.02862 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  19. [19]

    , volume=

    Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source , author=. , volume=

  20. [20]

    , volume=

    Possible periodic activity in the repeating FRB 121102 , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y , archivePrefix =. 2005.10324 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x , archivePrefix =. 2005.10828 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Detection of two bright radio bursts from magnetar SGR 1935 + 2154. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01246-3 , archivePrefix =. 2007.05101 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 1935

  24. [24]

    , volume=

    Fast radio bursts , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    A simple relationship for the spectro-temporal structure of bursts from FRB 121102. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2723 , archivePrefix =. 2008.02395 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    , volume=

    CHIME/FRB Discovery of Eight New Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    A Bright Millisecond Radio Burst of Extragalactic Origin. , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1147532 , archivePrefix =. 0709.4301 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    A second source of repeating fast radio bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0864-x , archivePrefix =. 1901.04525 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Nine New Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources from CHIME/FRB. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7208 , archivePrefix =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7208 2041

  30. [30]

    , year = 2017, month = jan, volume =

    The Host Galaxy and Redshift of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst FRB 121102. , year = 2017, month = jan, volume =

    2017

  31. [31]

    Platts and A

    E. Platts and A. Weltman and A. Walters and S.P. Tendulkar and J.E.B. Gordin and S. Kandhai , journal =. A living theory catalogue for fast radio bursts , year =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.06.003 , file =

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.06.003 2019

  32. [32]

    Coherent Nonlinear Optics , pages=

    Superradiance , author=. Coherent Nonlinear Optics , pages=. 1980 , publisher=

    1980

  33. [33]

    1976", month =

    Theory of superradiance in an extended, optically thick medium. , year = "1976", month = "Sep", volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.14.1169 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1103/physreva.14.1169 1976

  34. [34]

    1963", month =

    Radio Observations of OH in the Interstellar Medium. , year = "1963", month = "Nov", volume =. doi:10.1038/200829a0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/200829a0 1963

  35. [35]

    1965", month =

    Observations of a Strong Unidentified Microwave Line and of Emission from the OH Molecule. , year = "1965", month = "Oct", volume =. doi:10.1038/208029a0 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1038/208029a0 1965

  36. [36]

    Dicke, R. H. , title =. Phys. Rev. , year = 1954, month = jan, volume = 93, pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.93.99 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 1954

  37. [37]

    Super-radiance: Multiatomic Coherent Emission , author=

  38. [38]

    , volume=

    Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission , author=. , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

    1982

  39. [39]

    Journal of the Optical Society of America B Optical Physics , keywords =

    Dicke superradiance in solids [Invited]. Journal of the Optical Society of America B Optical Physics , keywords =. 2016. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.33.000C80 , archivePrefix =. 1602.04374 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Quantum electron

    The coherence brightened laser , author=. Quantum electron. , volume=

  41. [41]

    , year = 1970, month = nov, volume = 2, pages =

    Cooperative Phenomena in Resonant Electromagnetic Propagation. , year = 1970, month = nov, volume = 2, pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.2.1730 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1103/physreva.2.1730 1970

  42. [42]

    , volume=

    Fereshteh Rajabi and Martin Houde , title=. , volume=

  43. [43]

    Dicke's Superradiance in Astrophysics

    Rajabi, Fereshteh and Houde, Martin , journal=. Dicke's Superradiance in Astrophysics

  44. [44]

    Explaining recurring maser flares in the ISM through large-scale entangled quantum mechanical states. Sci. Adv. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601858 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601858

  45. [45]

    2016 , school=

    Dicke's Superradiance in Astrophysics , author=. 2016 , school=

    2016

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    New evidence for Dicke's superradiance in the 6.7 GHz methanol spectral line in the interstellar medium. , keywords =. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz074 , archivePrefix =. 1810.04365 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Astronomical masers and Dicke's superradiance. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1067 , archivePrefix =. 2004.07327 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Triggered superradiance and fast radio bursts. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3046 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3046

  49. [49]

    The Role of Superradiance in Cosmic Fast Radio Bursts , howpublished =

    Mathews, Abhilash , year=. The Role of Superradiance in Cosmic Fast Radio Bursts , howpublished =

  50. [50]

    and Mathews, A

    Houde, M. and Mathews, A. and Rajabi, F. , title = ". , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3205 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3205

  51. [51]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Giant burst of methanol maser in S255IR-NIRS3. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833443 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833443

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Periodic variability of 6.7 GHz methanol masers in G22.357+0.066. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117145 , archivePrefix =. 1105.4089 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    When accretion turns into ejection

    Radio outburst from a massive (proto)star. When accretion turns into ejection. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732238 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732238

  54. [54]

    A flare of methanol maser in S255. Astron. Telegram , keywords =

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Extended CH _ 3 OH maser flare excited by a bursting massive YSO. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730659 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730659

  56. [56]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Monitoring observations of 6.7 GHz methanol masers. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2693 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2693

  57. [57]

    Astrophysical Masers: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe , year = "2018", editor =

    On the origin of methanol maser variability: Clues from long-term monitoring. Astrophysical Masers: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe , year = "2018", editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921317010523 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921317010523 2018

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    The discovery of a new, very strong, and widespread interstellar methanol maser line. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/186177 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/186177

  59. [59]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    H _ 2 O masers in a jet-driven bow shock: episodic ejection from a massive young stellar object. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw958 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw958

  60. [60]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Mapping Observations of 6.7 GHz Methanol Masers with the Japanese VLBI Network. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/pasj/60.1.23 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/pasj/60.1.23

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Kinematics of W3(OH): First Proper Motions of OH Masers from VLBI Measurements. , keywords =. 1992. doi:10.1086/171807 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/171807 1992

  62. [62]

    Astrophysical Masers: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe , year = "2018", editor =

    Variability of water masers in evolved stars on timescales of decades. Astrophysical Masers: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe , year = "2018", editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921317009450 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921317009450 2018

  63. [63]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Quasi-periodic Formaldehyde Maser Flares in the Massive Protostellar Object IRAS 18566+0408. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/717/2/L133 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/717/2/l133 2041

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    Variability of methanol and OH masers in G339.62-0.12. , keywords =

  65. [65]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Discovery of 6.035 GHz Hydroxyl Maser Flares in IRAS 18566+ 0408 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  66. [66]

    , volume=

    Blast Waves from Magnetar Flares and Fast Radio Bursts , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  67. [67]

    , volume=

    On the Time--Frequency Downward Drifting of Repeating Fast Radio Bursts , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Scintillation Can Explain the Spectral Structure of the Bright Radio Burst from SGR 1935+2154. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abaa40 , archivePrefix =. 2006.13184 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1935

  69. [69]

    , volume=

    What does FRB light-curve variability tell us about the emission mechanism? , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz700 , archivePrefix =. 1902.01866 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Lensing of Fast Radio Bursts by Plasma Structures in Host Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa74da , archivePrefix =. 1703.06580 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Long-term monitoring of 6.7-GHz methanol masers. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08340.x , adsurl =

    arXiv 2004

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Periodic flares in the methanol maser source G9.62+0.20E. , keywords =. 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06426.x , adsurl =

    arXiv 2003

  74. [74]

    Procedure of the International Astronomical Union , volume=

    Periodic methanol masers and colliding wind binaries , author=. Procedure of the International Astronomical Union , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  75. [75]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Direct Diagnostics of Forming Massive Stars: Stellar Pulsation and Periodic Variability of Maser Sources. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L20 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/l20 2041

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    A Water Maser Flare in W49N: Amplification by a Rotating Foreground Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/306482 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/306482

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Interacting masers and the extreme brightness of astrophysical water masers. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/185428 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/185428

  78. [78]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Bursting Activity in a High-Mass Star-Forming Region G33.64-0.21 Observed with the 6.7GHz Methanol Maser. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/pasj/64.1.17 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/64.1.17

  79. [79]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Observations of the bursting activity of the 6.7 GHz methanol maser in G33.641-0.228. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psu097 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psu097

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Periodic flare of the 6.7-GHz methanol maser in IRAS 22198+6336. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psu053 , archivePrefix =. 1405.5972 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.