Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Kerr-NUT Thermodynamics: Misner Strings and Nut Charges

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Kerr-NUT spacetime carries a conserved charge dual to its angular momentum.

desk verdict Honest, careful reformulation of Kerr-NUT thermodynamics with a new charge basis, but the conservation of N_c is asserted rather than demonstrated; worth peer review with a demand for the missing calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01152 v1 pith:3KDNOXX5 submitted 2026-08-02 gr-qc

Mohamed Tharwat , Adel Awad This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C40 PACS 04.70.-s04.20.-q
keywords Kerr-NUTTaub-NUTMisnerstringsnutchargeKomarintegralsfirstlawofblackholethermodynamicsSmarrrelationGibbs-Duhem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Kerr-NUT spacetime possesses a conserved charge dual to its angular momentum, in the same sense that the nut charge $n$ is dual to the mass $m$. The new charge is $N_c = c n$, built from the nut parameter and the parameter $c$ that positions the Misner strings. Evaluating the Hodge-dual Komar integral of the rotational Killing form over a sphere at infinity gives $-\frac{1}{8\pi}\int_{S^2_{r\to\infty}} d\chi = 2 c n^2$, which the authors take to prove that $c n$ is conserved. With $N_n = n$ and $N_c = c n$ as independent charges, the first law, the Smarr relation, and the Gibbs-Duhem relation all close, yielding a full-cohomogeneity thermodynamics for the rotating NUT solution. The new charge contributes only when both the Kerr rotation parameter $a$ and the nut-related rotation $c$ are present, since its potential $\Phi_{N_c} = a/(2r_h)$ vanishes at $a = 0$.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the Komar-integral boundary construction adapted to the Kerr-NUT metric, with the Misner strings treated as tube boundaries $T_\pm$ and the sphere at infinity as the outer boundary. The load-bearing identity is the Hodge-dual integral of the rotational Killing form, $-\frac{1}{8\pi}\int_{S^2_{r\to\infty}} d\chi = 2 c n^2$, whose closure establishes $N_c = c n$ as a conserved charge. The parameter $c$ enters the metric as a shift of the Misner strings, and the decomposition $N_\pm = n(1 \pm c)$ into north and south string charges is what makes it possible to separate the conserved quantities. The Euclidean action provides an independent check: the Gibbs energy computed from $I = \beta m/2$ reproduces the potentials in the first law and satisfies the Gibbs-Duhem relation.

What would settle it

Compute the integral $-\frac{1}{8\pi}\int_{S^2_{r\to\infty}} d\chi$ in two coordinate systems related by $t \to t + 2 n c \varphi$. If the value is not $2 c n^2$ in both, or if it changes under this shift, then $N_c = c n$ is not a gauge-invariant charge and the first law (27) loses its independent content; the paper's claim is that the integral closes and gives $2 c n^2$ without needing string regularisation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a conserved dual angular-momentum charge for the Kerr-NUT solution. The usual Komar integral for $\partial_\phi$ gives the angular momentum, split into horizon and string contributions; the paper shows that the Hodge dual of the same two-form integrates over the boundary to $-\frac{1}{8\pi}\int_{S^2_{r\to\infty}} d\chi = 2 c n^2 = (c n)(2 n)$, and that closure of this integral fixes $c n$ as a conserved quantity. This is the rotational analogue of the nut charge $n$ being the dual of the mass $m$. Taking the conserved charges $N_n = n$ and $N_c = c n$ with potentials $\Phi_{N_n} = -n/(2r_h)$ and $\Phi_{N_c} = a/(2r_h)$, the first law $dU = T dS + \Phi_{N_n} dN_n + \Phi_{N_c} dN_c + \Omega_H dJ_{\rm bh} + \Omega_H dJ_{\rm s}$ holds, and the same charges satisfy the Smarr relation and the Gibbs-Duhem relation derived from the Euclidean action. The two-string charges $N_\pm = n(1 \pm c)$ are a linear reparametrisation of the two conserved charges, so both descriptions are thermodynamically equivalent.

Load-bearing premise

The argument requires that the parameter $c$, which shifts the Misner strings, is an independent physical charge whose variations are allowed in the first law; if $c$ is only a coordinate artifact, the new term $\Phi_{N_c} dN_c$ is not a legitimate thermodynamic variation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any Kerr-NUT spacetime with nonzero $a$ and $c$, the first law must include the work term $\Phi_{N_c} dN_c$; omitting it leaves the thermodynamics under-determined.
  • The new charge $N_c = c n$ vanishes when the string-position parameter $c$ is zero, so the standard Kerr-Taub-NUT thermodynamics with $c = 0$ misses an entire conserved sector.
  • Because the two sets of charges are linear transforms of each other, the geometric string-by-string picture ($N_\pm$) and the conserved-charge picture ($N_n, N_c$) make identical predictions for entropy, mass, and angular velocity.
  • The conservation arguments fix all parameters of the solution: mass fixes $r_h$, angular momentum fixes $a - 3cn$, and the new conservation fixes $cn$, so no Misner periodicity condition is needed for a full-cohomogeneity first law.
  • The Gibbs-Duhem relation and the differential Gibbs equation hold for both charge choices, giving an action-based consistency check of the Komar calculation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the same Hodge-dual construction should be attempted for Kerr-NUT-AdS, where the phase structure with $cn \neq 0$ is open; $N_c = c n$ is the natural candidate charge to test there.
  • My inference: if $c$ is eventually shown to be pure gauge, equation (29) would read as a consistency condition fixing $c$ in terms of $n$ rather than as a new charge, collapsing the first law to the single nut-charge sector.
  • My inference: the duality pattern $m \leftrightarrow n$, $J \leftrightarrow N_c$ suggests a larger electric/magnetic-type symmetry of the Kerr-NUT phase space; probing whether the full set of potentials respects that symmetry could reveal whether the analogy extends beyond the two charges.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a thermodynamics for the Kerr-NUT spacetime without imposing Misner's periodicity, following the approach of Awad and Eissa. The authors compute Komar integrals for the mass, angular momentum, and two nut charges N_n=n and N_c=cn, and propose N_c as a new conserved charge dual to angular momentum, in analogy with the nut charge n as dual mass. They verify that the first law (27), the Smarr relation (12), and the Gibbs-Duhem relation (36) are satisfied, and they support this with a Euclidean action computation. The main novel claim is that c n is an independent conserved thermodynamic charge.

Significance. If established, this would extend the gravito-magnetic duality picture to rotation: N_c would be a boundary charge associated with the Misner string position, enabling a full-cohomogeneity first law for Kerr-NUT. The paper is careful to compare with existing charge identifications and to show that both the N_± basis and the N_n,N_c basis satisfy the same relations. It also transparently states where its arguments are heuristic. However, the conservation and physicality of N_c are not yet demonstrated to the standard required for a new thermodynamic charge; the central claim currently rests on an asserted integral and a product-form argument.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (29)] The central conservation claim is not established. The only derivation offered is the statement that a 'straight forward calculation' gives -1/(8π)∫_{S^2_{r→∞}} dχ = 2 c n², followed by the inference that because this equals (c n)(2n) and is 'fixed independently from n', c n is conserved. No Komar or covariant-phase-space computation is shown, no closure over all boundaries (including the Misner strings) is demonstrated, and the sentence 'Since the conserved quantity 2cn² is the product of cn with 2n and is fixed independently from n' is not a conservation law; it restates parameter dependence. Please provide the explicit computation of the integral, including the treatment of the Misner string boundaries, and derive N_c as a charge from a closed current or from the covariant symplectic form. As written, Eq. (29) is an assertion, not a proof.
  2. [Section 3, paragraphs after Eq. (29)] The physical status of c is left ambiguous. The paper states that c can be added through the large coordinate transformation t→t+2ncφ and that 'the only reason for the choice cn is convention.' If c is a pure (large) gauge parameter, dN_c in Eq. (27) is not an admissible thermodynamic variation and the new first law is merely a linear recombination of the N_± charges. The authors need to show that N_c is gauge invariant or that the large coordinate transformation carries a nonzero boundary charge. A concrete test would be to compute the symplectic charge associated with ∂_c or with the large gauge transformation and verify that it equals c n; this would also fix the normalization. Without this, the claimed duality to angular momentum is not physically supported.
  3. [Section 2, Eqs. (11)-(18); Section 4, Eq. (32)] The first law (18) is presented after replacing the boundary integrals in Eq. (10) with charges and potentials, but the individual Komar integrals, especially those over the Misner string boundaries T_± and the quantities Π_±, are not computed or displayed. Since the first law is a central output and the identification of N_± and Φ_± is nonstandard, these computations should be shown or referenced in a reproducible form. The same applies to the Euclidean action result I=βm/2 in Eq. (32), which is asserted without derivation; the action check in Section 4 is then not independently verifiable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The text contains several typographical slips, including 'Schwarzchild' (should be 'Schwarzschild') and 'straight forward' (should be 'straightforward').
  2. [Eq. (22)] The expression 'Φ_N+ dN+ Φ_N− dN' appears to be missing a plus sign between the two terms; the intended equation is Φ_N+ dN + Φ_N− dN.
  3. [Section 3, conservation arguments] The argument that mass conservation fixes r_h is not fully explicit because m(r_h,a,n) is a function of three parameters; please spell out why variations in a or n cannot compensate.
  4. [Section 4, Eq. (31)] The action in Eq. (31) is written without the usual 1/(16πG) prefactor or a statement of units; specifying conventions would make Eq. (32) checkable.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Conservation of N_c = cn is inferred from an integral equal to (cn)(2n), making the new charge a restatement of the input parameters; the first-law checks are a linear recombination.

  1. self definitional [Section 3, Eq. (29)]
    "Evaluating this integral over the surface where r→∞ yields −1/8π ∫_{S^2 r→∞} dχ=2cn^2 = (cn)·(2n). Since the conserved quantity 2cn^2 is the product of cn with 2n and is fixed independently from n, it follows that cn is conserved."

    N_c is defined as cn (Eq. (25)). The integral (29) evaluates to 2 c n^2 = (c n)(2 n). The inference that this fixes c n assumes the integral is a conserved quantity 'fixed independently from n'—but that is precisely what is at issue. The calculation gives the value of a parameter-dependent integral; it does not show c n is invariant under variations or under the coordinate transformation t→t+2 n c φ that the paper says generates c. Hence the conservation claim is a restatement of the parameter dependence of the metric, not a derived conservation law. The later use of dN_c in the first law (27) therefore imports the unproved assumption as an input.

  2. renaming known result [Section 3, Eqs. (25)–(27), (39)]
    "Using the following identification Nn = (N+ + N−)/2 = n, Nc = (N+ − N−)/2 = cn... Since the linear combination of any two valid thermodynamic charges results in a consistent first law, this is not surprising."

    The first law (27) is obtained from (18) by the invertible linear transformation (25). The Smarr relation (12) and Gibbs-Duhem relation (36) are invariant under this basis change, as Eq. (39) states: N+Φ_N+ + N−Φ_N− = NnΦ_Nn + NcΦ_Nc. Therefore the consistency checks hold for any basis and do not independently confirm that N_c is a physical conserved charge. Presenting the N_n,N_c formulation as a new result is a renaming of the previously written N_± formulation, though the paper itself candidly acknowledges this.

full rationale

Most of the paper is self-contained: the Komar-integrals calculation (Section 2), the Euclidean action calculation (Section 4), and the algebraic verification of the first law, Smarr, and Gibbs-Duhem relations are transparent and reproducible from the metric (2). No machine-checked or externally falsified uniqueness theorem is invoked. However, the central new charge N_c = cn is not independently established. Eq. (29) computes an integral whose value is 2 c n^2 = (c n)(2 n); the text then asserts this product is 'fixed independently from n' and concludes cn is conserved. That inference is circular because the integral's value is a function of exactly the parameters whose conservation is claimed; no gauge-invariant or boundary-condition argument fixes c, especially since Section 3 concedes that c is introduced by the coordinate transformation t → t + 2 n c φ and that 'the only reason for the choice cn is convention.' The first law in the (N_n,N_c) basis is a linear recombination of the (N_+,N_-) first law, as the paper admits, so the consistency checks are satisfied by construction. These features make the central conservation claim partially circular (self-definitional), even though the geometric computations and algebraic checks are legitimate. I therefore assign 6, not 8 or 10, because there is substantive independent calculation and the circularity is localized to the interpretation of Eq. (29) and the basis change.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Komar integral machinery, on the physical interpretation of the nut charge as dual mass, and on the assumption that the string position parameter c is an independently variable charge. The new charge N_c is defined from existing parameters; no new fundamental entities are introduced beyond a charge reparametrization.

free parameters (2)
  • c (Misner string position parameter)
    Kept nonvanishing and varied as a thermodynamic charge, while most prior work sets c=0. Its physical meaning and independent variability are assumed.
  • Charge identification N_c = c n = c n
    The combination c n is chosen by hand as the new conserved charge; this choice is motivated by the integral result and by comparison with the literature, not forced by an independent principle.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Komar integral formalism and Stokes' theorem are valid for defining conserved charges.
    Used throughout Section 2 to define mass, angular momentum, and nut charges, and to close the boundary integrals in Eq. (8).
  • domain assumption The nut charge n is a conserved 'dual mass' via gravito-magnetic duality.
    Adopted from the literature (Refs. [26,27]); the paper relies on n being fixed independently to infer conservation of cn from 2cn^2.
  • domain assumption The Misner strings are physical boundaries whose contributions to Komar integrals must be included.
    The boundary decomposition in Eq. (7) includes string tubes T+ and T-; if strings are not physical boundaries, the charge definitions and the first law change.
invented entities (1)
  • Dual angular momentum charge N_c = c n
    purpose: Serves as a thermodynamic conjugate to the potential Φ_Nc = a/(2 r_h) and is claimed to be a conserved quantity dual to the angular momentum J.
    Introduced as a new conserved charge, but the supporting integral (29) is a combination of existing parameters and the charge is a linear combination of known N_± charges. It has no independent falsifiable handle beyond first-law consistency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kerr-NUT Thermodynamics: Misner Strings and Nut Charges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3KDNOXX5

@misc{pith2026260801152,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kerr-NUT Thermodynamics: Misner Strings and Nut Charges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3KDNOXX5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01152}
}
abstract

Using the thermodynamic approach introduced in e-Print: 2206.09124 [hep-th] to the case of Kerr-NUT solution, we demonstrate the existence of a new conserved quantity that is dual to the angular momentum, in the same way that the nut charge "n" is dual to the mass "m". This quantity exists regardless of the presence of the Kerr rotation parameter $a$, but only affects its thermodynamics when $a\neq 0$. The thermodynamic quantities calculated together with the two charges $N_{c}=cn$ and $n$ lead to consistent thermodynamic relations. That is, the first law, Smarr's and Gibbs-Duhem relations are all satisfied.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    The First Law for Rotating NUTs

    Alvaro Ballon Bordo et al. “The First Law for Rotating NUTs”. In:Physics Letters B798 (Nov. 2019). arXiv:1905.06350 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th], p. 134972.ISSN: 03702693.DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134972

    arXiv 2019

  2. [1]

    Empty Space-Times Admitting a Three Parameter Group of Motions

    A. H. Taub. “Empty Space-Times Admitting a Three Parameter Group of Motions”. In: Annals of Mathematics53.3 (1951), pp. 472–490.ISSN: 0003-486X.DOI:10 . 2307 / 1969567

    work page 1951

  3. [2]

    Empty-Space Generalization of the Schwarzschild Metric

    E. Newman, L. Tamburino, and T. Unti. “Empty-Space Generalization of the Schwarzschild Metric”. In:J. Math. Phys.4.7 (July 1963), pp. 915–923.ISSN: 0022-2488.DOI:10 . 1063/1.1704018

    work page 1963

  4. [3]

    A combined Kerr-NUT solution of the Einstein field equation

    M. Demianski and E. T. Newman. “A combined Kerr-NUT solution of the Einstein field equation.” In:Bulletin de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences Series des Sciences Mathe- matiques Astronomiques et Physiques14 (Dec. 1966). ADS Bibcode: 1966BAPSS..14..653D, pp. 653–657

    work page 1966

  5. [4]

    The Flatter Regions of Newman, Unti, and Tamburino’s Generalized Schwarzschild Space

    Charles W. Misner. “The Flatter Regions of Newman, Unti, and Tamburino’s Generalized Schwarzschild Space”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics4.7 (1963), pp. 924–937. ISSN: 0022-2488.DOI:10.1063/1.1704019

    doi:10.1063/1.1704019 1963

  6. [5]

    The Extended Thermodynamic Phase Structure of Taub-NUT and Taub-Bolt

    Clifford V . Johnson. “The Extended Thermodynamic Phase Structure of Taub-NUT and Taub-Bolt”. en. In:Class. Quantum Grav.31.22 (Nov. 2014). arXiv:1406.4533 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th], p. 225005.ISSN: 0264-9381, 1361-6382.DOI:10.1088/0264- 9381/ 31/22/225005

    arXiv 2014

  7. [6]

    Gravitational Entropy and Global Structure

    S. W. Hawking and C. J. Hunter. “Gravitational Entropy and Global Structure”. In:Phys. Rev. D59.4 (Jan. 1999). arXiv:hep-th/9808085, p. 044025.ISSN: 0556-2821, 1089-4918. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.044025

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  8. [7]

    Nut Charge, Anti-de Sitter Space and Entropy

    S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter, and D. N. Page. “Nut Charge, Anti-de Sitter Space and Entropy”. In:Phys. Rev. D59.4 (Jan. 1999). arXiv:hep-th/9809035, p. 044033.ISSN: 0556-2821, 1089-4918.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.044033

    arXiv 1999

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    The Action of Instantons with Nut Charge

    C. J. Hunter. “The Action of Instantons with Nut Charge”. In:Phys. Rev. D59.2 (Dec. 1998). arXiv:gr-qc/9807010, p. 024009.ISSN: 0556-2821, 1089-4918.DOI:10.1103/ PhysRevD.59.024009

    1998 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Large N Phases, Gravitational Instantons and the Nuts and Bolts of AdS Holography

    Andrew Chamblin et al. “Large N Phases, Gravitational Instantons and the Nuts and Bolts of AdS Holography”. In:Phys. Rev. D59.6 (Feb. 1999). arXiv:hep-th/9808177, p. 064010.ISSN: 0556-2821, 1089-4918.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.064010

    1999 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Higher Dimensional Taub-NUTs and Taub-Bolts in Einstein-Maxwell Gravity

    Adel M. Awad. “Higher Dimensional Taub-NUTs and Taub-Bolts in Einstein-Maxwell Gravity”. en. In:Class. Quantum Grav.23.9 (May 2006). Number: 9 arXiv:hep-th/0508235, pp. 2849–2859.ISSN: 0264-9381, 1361-6382.DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/006

    2006 arXiv

  4. [11]

    The Entropy of Taub-Bolt Solution

    L. Fatibene et al. “The Entropy of Taub-Bolt Solution”. In:Annals of Physics284.2 (Sept. 2000). Number: 2 arXiv:gr-qc/9906114, pp. 197–214.ISSN: 00034916.DOI:10.1006/ aphy.2000.6062

    2000 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Thermodynamic V olumes for AdS-Taub-NUT and AdS-Taub-Bolt

    Clifford V . Johnson. “Thermodynamic V olumes for AdS-Taub-NUT and AdS-Taub-Bolt”. en. In:Class. Quantum Grav.31.23 (Dec. 2014). arXiv:1405.5941 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th], p. 235003.ISSN: 0264-9381, 1361-6382.DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/31/23/235003. 12

    2014 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Rehabilitating space-times with NUTs

    G ´erard Cl´ement, Dmitri Gal’tsov, and Mourad Guenouche. “Rehabilitating space-times with NUTs”. In:Physics Letters B750 (Nov. 2015). arXiv:1508.07622 [gr-qc, physics:hep- th, physics:math-ph], pp. 591–594.ISSN: 03702693.DOI:10.1016/j.physletb.2015. 09.074

    2015 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Thermodynamics of Dyonic NUT Charged Black Holes with Entropy as Noether Charge

    Niloofar Abbasvandi, Masoumeh Tavakoli, and Robert B. Mann. “Thermodynamics of Dyonic NUT Charged Black Holes with Entropy as Noether Charge”. en. In:J. High Energ. Phys.2021.8 (Aug. 2021). arXiv:2107.00182 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th], p. 152.ISSN: 1029-8479.DOI:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)152

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Misner Gravitational Charges and Variable String Strengths

    Alvaro Ballon Bordo et al. “Misner Gravitational Charges and Variable String Strengths”. In:Class. Quantum Grav.36.19 (Oct. 2019). arXiv:1905.03785 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th], p. 194001.ISSN: 0264-9381, 1361-6382.DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/ab3d4d

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Thermodynamics of Lorentzian Taub-NUT spacetimes

    Robie A. Hennigar, David Kubiznak, and Robert B. Mann. “Thermodynamics of Lorentzian Taub-NUT spacetimes”. en. In:Phys. Rev. D100.6 (Sept. 2019). arXiv:1903.08668 [gr- qc, physics:hep-th], p. 064055.ISSN: 2470-0010, 2470-0029.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD. 100.064055

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    arXiv:2003.02268 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th]

    Alvaro Ballon Bordo, Finnian Gray, and David Kubiznak.Thermodynamics of Rotating NUTty Dyons. arXiv:2003.02268 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th]. May 2020.DOI:10 . 48550 / arXiv.2003.02268

    2003 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Lorentzian Taub-NUT spacetimes: Misner string charges and the first law

    Adel Awad and Somaya Eissa. “Lorentzian Taub-NUT spacetimes: Misner string charges and the first law”. en. In:Phys. Rev. D105.12 (June 2022). Number: 12 arXiv:2206.09124 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th], p. 124034.ISSN: 2470-0010, 2470-0029.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD. 105.124034

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    A new interpretation of the NUT metric in general relativity

    W. B. Bonnor. “A new interpretation of the NUT metric in general relativity”. en. In: Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.66.1 (July 1969), pp. 145–151.ISSN: 0305-0041, 1469- 8064.DOI:10.1017/S0305004100044807

    1969 doi

  13. [21]

    arXiv:2104.13563 [gr-qc]

    Yao Xiao, Jialin Zhang, and Hongwei Yu.Thermodynamical multihair and phase tran- sitions of 4-dimensional charged Taub-NUT-AdS spacetimes. arXiv:2104.13563 [gr-qc]. Apr. 2021.DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2104.13563

    2021 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    arXiv:2304.06705 [physics]

    Adel Awad and Esraa Elkhateeb.Dyonic Taub-NUT-AdS: Unconstraint thermodynamics and phase Structure. arXiv:2304.06705 [physics]. Apr. 2023.DOI:10.48550/arXiv. 2304.06705

    2023 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Alvaro Ballon, Finnian Gray, and David Kubiznak.Thermodynamics and Phase Transi- tions of NUTty Dyons. en. Issue: arXiv:1904.00030 arXiv:1904.00030 [gr-qc, physics:hep- th]. Mar. 2019

    1904 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dyonic Taub–NUT–AdS black branes: thermodynamics and phase diagrams

    Amr AlBarqawy et al. “Dyonic Taub–NUT–AdS black branes: thermodynamics and phase diagrams”. en. In:Eur . Phys. J. C85.12 (Dec. 2025), p. 1411.ISSN: 1434-6052.DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15144-3. 13

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    Dyonic Taub-NUT-AdS Spaces: Phase Structures of all Hori- zon Geometries

    Mohamed Tharwat et al. “Dyonic Taub-NUT-AdS Spaces: Phase Structures of all Hori- zon Geometries”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.8 (Apr. 2024). arXiv:2312.15811 [gr-qc].ISSN: 2470-0010, 2470-0029.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084026

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Tom ´as Ort´ın.Gravity and Strings. en. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Jan. 2015. ISBN: 978-0-521-76813-9 978-1-139-01975-0.DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139019750

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    Taub–NUT space-time

    Jerry B. Griffiths and Ji ˇr´ı Podolsk ´y. “Taub–NUT space-time”. In:Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Feb. 2010, pp. 213–237.DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511635397.013

    2010 doi

  20. [28]

    Complement to thermo- dynamics of dyonic Taub-NUT-AdS spacetime

    Robert B. Mann, Leopoldo A. Pando Zayas, and Miok Park. “Complement to thermo- dynamics of dyonic Taub-NUT-AdS spacetime”. In:J. High Energ. Phys.2021.3 (Mar. 2021). arXiv:2012.13506 [hep-th], p. 39.ISSN: 1029-8479.DOI:10.1007/JHEP03(2021) 039

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Rodriguez.First Law for Kerr Taub-NUT AdS Black Holes

    Nelson Hern ´andez Rodr´ıguez and Maria J. Rodriguez.First Law for Kerr Taub-NUT AdS Black Holes. arXiv:2112.00780 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th]. Dec. 2021.DOI:10 . 48550 / arXiv.2112.00780

    2021 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    The First Law for the Lorentzian Rotating Taub- NUT

    Ernesto Frodden and Diego Hidalgo. “The First Law for the Lorentzian Rotating Taub- NUT”. In:Physics Letters B832 (Sept. 2022). arXiv:2109.07715 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th], p. 137264.ISSN: 03702693.DOI:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137264

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    First law of black hole thermodynamics and the weak cosmic cen- sorship conjecture for Kerr-Newman Taub-NUT black holes

    Si-Jiang Yang et al. “First law of black hole thermodynamics and the weak cosmic cen- sorship conjecture for Kerr-Newman Taub-NUT black holes”. In:Eur . Phys. J. C83.12 (Dec. 2023). arXiv:2306.05266 [gr-qc], p. 1111.ISSN: 1434-6052.DOI:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-12265-5

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Thermodynamics of Taub-NUT and Plebanski Solu- tions

    Hai-Shan Liu, H. Lu, and Liang Ma. “Thermodynamics of Taub-NUT and Plebanski Solu- tions”. In:J. High Energ. Phys.2022.10 (Oct. 2022). arXiv:2208.05494 [gr-qc, physics:hep- th], p. 174.ISSN: 1029-8479.DOI:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)174

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The nut solution as a gravitational dyon

    J. S. Dowker. “The nut solution as a gravitational dyon”. In:General Relativity and Grav- itation5 (Oct. 1974). ADS Bibcode: 1974GReGr...5..603D, pp. 603–613.ISSN: 0001- 7701.DOI:10.1007/BF02451402. 14

    1974 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.