Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Exciton-induced magnons carrying orbital angular momentum in CrI3

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Excitons in CrI3 launch magnon wave-packets whose orbital angular momentum cancels their spin angular momentum, allowing magnetization quenching without lattice angular momentum exchange.

desk verdict Interesting and well-constructed paper, but the exact angular-momentum compensation is built into the model, not shown by the experiment. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02010 v1 pith:5D2UMKKJ submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Martin Pavelka , Vishal Shokeen , Ruslan Chulkov , Soma Dutta , David Muradas Belinchón , Ulrich Noumbe , Mahmoud Abdel-Hafiez , M. Venkata Kamalakar
show 10 more authors
Mathias Augustin Vitaliy Goryashko Torstein Hegstad Johan H. Mentink Jamal Berakdar Oscar Gr{aa}näs Anders Bergman Olle Eriksson Anna Delin Hermann A. Durr
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnonorbitalangularmomentumCrI3Dzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionexciton-phononcouplingultrafastdemagnetizationtime-resolvedMOKEatomisticspindynamicslinearspin-wavetheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that when an atomic-like exciton is created in the ferromagnetic insulator CrI3, the lattice distortion around it drives coherent phonons that, through spin-lattice coupling, launch magnon wave-packets. The key claim is that these wave-packets carry orbital angular momentum almost equal in magnitude to, and opposite in sign from, the spin angular momentum they remove from the magnetic order, so the total angular momentum of the wave-packet is zero. If correct, this means CrI3 can demagnetize without transferring angular momentum to the crystal lattice, phonons, or any other reservoir, an internal compensation channel not previously considered in ultrafast magnetization dynamics. The paper supports the scenario with time-resolved optical measurements showing a fluence threshold for 2.4 THz spin oscillations after B-exciton pumping, and with atomistic spin dynamics and linear spin-wave calculations that reproduce the spiral magnon wave-packets and their angular momentum balance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the local modulation of the chiral Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya exchange interaction by the 2.4 THz bond-bending phonon mode around an exciton localized on a single Cr site. Frozen-phonon first-principles calculations provide the dependence of the isotropic and chiral exchange interactions on phonon displacement; the chiral term ΔQ(r) creates a torque pattern on next-nearest-neighbor spins whose phase winds around the exciton. This winding is quantified as orbital angular momentum by applying the operator Lz = −iħ(x∂y − y∂x) to the complex magnon magnetization ψ(r,t), and it appears in real space as clockwise-rotating spiral wavefronts. The paper also shows that switch

What would settle it

Measure the angular momentum budget during 2.4 THz coherent phonon excitation in CrI3: if the lattice or another reservoir gains angular momentum equal to the spin lost by the magnetization, or if the Lz + ΔSz sum is not zero, the internal-compensation claim fails. A specific observable is the helicity of the K-point magnons: the model predicts clockwise orbital rotation for counterclockwise spin precession, so time-resolved resonant inelastic x-ray scattering or micro-Brillouin light scattering resolving magnon circular polarization—and its reversal under an inverted DMI sign or under magneti

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an internal angular momentum balance in magnon wave-packets: Lz ≈ −ΔSz, so Lz + ΔSz = 0. The exciton supplies the real-space center of rotation that propagating Bloch magnons lack, giving the excited magnons an atomic-scale orbital angular momentum. In the simulations, the spiral phase fronts of the wave-packet rotate clockwise while the atomic spins precess counterclockwise, which is the direct signature of antiparallel orbital and spin angular momentum. The authors conclude that the spin angular momentum lost by the magnetization is compensated by the orbital motion of the very magnons that carry it away, with no need for chiral phonons or lattice angular momentum.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the frozen-phonon result that the 2.4 THz phonon modulates the chiral Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya exchange with the right sign, magnitude, and symmetry, and on treating each exciton as localized at a single Cr site with linear exchange modulation; the paper itself notes that removing the chiral modulation eliminates the magnon wave-packets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, ultrafast demagnetization in CrI3 does not require angular momentum flow to the lattice; the magnon wave-packet itself carries the compensating orbital momentum, so no external reservoir is needed.
  • The B-exciton fluence threshold for observing 2.4 THz spin oscillations is explained: at low fluence the generated magnons have short wavelengths near the Brillouin-zone boundary and are optically 'hidden'; only when exciton wave-packets overlap does the signal become detectable.
  • The 2.4 THz phonon mode is the special channel because it is degenerate with K-point magnons that carry OAM, while the 3.9 THz mode is not, which explains the different damping behavior and phase relationships.
  • The clockwise-rotating spiral magnetization with counterclockwise spin precession provides a real-space, measurable signature of the antiparallel spin and orbital angular momentum balance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: the same exciton-localized chiral coupling mechanism should appear in other non-centrosymmetric van der Waals magnets; if so, pumping their exciton resonances should produce analogous spiral magnon wave-packets with a fluence threshold.
  • If the internal compensation is general, the Einstein–de Haas response of CrI3 during ultrafast demagnetization should show little or no lattice twist; a time-resolved diffraction experiment measuring lattice angular momentum would discriminate this channel from phonon-mediated angular momentum transfer.
  • Because the OAM magnitude is set by the exciton's location rather than by band topology, patterning exciton creation sites could provide a real-space route to controlling magnon OAM and helicity, complementing reciprocal-space magnon OAM engineering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved optical pump-probe measurements on CrI3 after exciton generation, showing coherent 2.4 and 3.9 THz phonon oscillations and spin oscillations, with a fluence threshold for the 2.4 THz spin signal after B-exciton pumping. It interprets the threshold as the formation of large-momentum magnon wave-packets that are invisible to optical detection. Atomistic spin dynamics simulations, parameterized by frozen-phonon DFT exchange modulations, produce spiral-shaped magnon wave-packets around an exciton; linear spin wave theory is used to support the mechanism. The central claim is that these wave-packets carry orbital angular momentum (OAM) nearly equal and opposite to their spin angular momentum, so that the magnetization can be quenched without angular momentum exchange with the lattice.

Significance. If correct, the proposed internal spin-orbital angular momentum balance in magnon wave-packets would add a new angular momentum channel to ultrafast magnetization dynamics and could be relevant for THz-frequency magnon OAM applications. The paper combines experiment, DFT, atomistic spin dynamics, and LSWT, and it provides reproducible open-source code (UppASD) and a data repository. The theoretical machinery is competent and the experimental data are extensive. However, the material-specific conclusion rests on several load-bearing inputs that are calibrated rather than measured, so the significance is conditional until those inputs are validated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods, Atomistic spin dynamics simulations] The renormalization of exchange interactions to place the K-point magnon at 2.4 THz is a load-bearing input. The text states that the ASD simulations use exchange interactions 'albeit with a renormalization in order to ensure that the top of the acoustic magnon band at the K point coincides with the frequency of the 2.4 THz phonon mode.' The system is then driven at 2.4 THz. Consequently the resonant magnon population at K is at least partly constructed by the simulation setup, not predicted from the material. The assertion that this 'does not change the underlying physics' is not substantiated; rescaling exchange interactions changes bandwidths, group velocities, and wavepacket dynamics. Please show that the unrenormalized DFT or the measured dispersion of refs. 6/7 already places the K-point mode at 2.4 THz within uncertainty, or systematically quantify the sensitivity of the OAM resul
  2. [Methods, Eq. (M2); Fig. S8; Fig. S9C] The chiral DMI modulation ΔQ(r) is the essential coupling for the central result: Fig. S9C shows that switching off the ΔQ term leads to 'negligible magnon excitations for both magnetic sublattices.' Yet the manuscript reports no numerical values, error bars, or validation of the frozen-phonon ΔJ/ΔQ against experimental magnon dispersions. The sign, magnitude, and symmetry of ΔQ are the decisive inputs that produce the spiral wave-packet and its OAM. Without quantitative reporting and/or a comparison to independent calculations or measurements, the central claim is conditional on a single DFT calculation.
  3. [OAM analysis; Methods definition of L_z; Fig. 4C] The relation L_z + ΔS_z = 0 is a kinematic property of a single-winding spiral under the OAM definition in Methods, L_z = −iℏ(x∂_y − y∂_x). For a wavefunction ψ ∼ f(r)e^{iφ}, L_z ψ = ℏψ, while a magnon carries ΔS_z = −ℏ. Thus the numerical observation in Fig. 4C is not by itself evidence for a material-specific angular-momentum compensation; the dynamical content of the claim lies in the creation and chirality of the spiral, which depends on the renormalized resonance and on ΔQ. The paper should explicitly separate this general kinematic identity from the material-specific prediction, and should not present the simulated L_z+ΔS_z=0 as an independent discovery.
  4. [Experimental results, Figs. 2, 3; LSWT Methods] The experimental evidence for the 'hidden' 2.4 THz magnons is indirect: it is an absence of a detectable spin oscillation below a fluence threshold, and no experiment directly measures the OAM or the real-space topology of the wavepacket. The title and abstract state that OAM-carrying magnons are 'demonstrated'; as written, the demonstration is from atomistic simulations and LSWT, not from the optical data. The LSWT calculation also drives the system at the computed gap bottom ('ω = Ω_K/2' in the Methods text), inheriting the same resonance input. Please rephrase the claims to distinguish measured phonon-spin coupling from simulated OAM, and specify a falsifiable experimental signature (e.g., momentum-resolved inelastic scattering or a THz emission pattern) that could test the wavepacket OAM.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods, LSWT] The notation in the linear spin wave theory section is garbled in several places: 'the bottom of the gap at the mE (7), ñ=^X/R' is unreadable, and equations such as 'M5=i^<=<V<JV<+^<Rå<Jå<' appear to have missing summation indices and corrupted Greek symbols. Please re-typeset these equations.
  2. [General] Typos and wording issues include 'exiton' (two occurrences in the ASD methods), 'interpeted', 'paprameters', and 'obtaind'. Also '»200 fs' should be '≈200 fs'.
  3. [Eq. (M2)] The time-dependence in Eq. (M2) is displayed as '[\(^-)' which is not legible. The intended form J_ij(t)=J_ij^0+ΔJ_ij sin(ωt) should be written explicitly.
  4. [Fig. 4C and text] The abstract says OAM is 'nearly equal' to spin angular momentum, while the text later states L_z+ΔS_z=0. Please reconcile 'nearly' with 'exactly' and specify the numerical accuracy of the compensation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Resonant magnon generation is an input: exchange renormalized to place K-point magnon at 2.4 THz, then driven at 2.4 THz; OAM compensation is a derived spiral property.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, 'Atomistic spin dynamics simulations'; Results section]
    "The ASD simulations include all magnetic interactions calculated for the monolayer albeit with a renormalization in order to ensure that the top of the acoustic magnon band at the K point coincides with the frequency of the 2.4 THz phonon mode. ... It is the energy degeneracy of the 2.4 THz phonon mode with magnons that carry OAM (see Fig. 1B) that can facilitate stronger energy transfer."

    The degeneracy between the 2.4 THz phonon and the K-point magnon is imposed by hand through renormalization, and the dynamics are then driven at 2.4 THz. The resulting population of K-point magnons and the claim that the phonon 'facilitates stronger energy transfer' are therefore not independent predictions but consequences of the chosen input. This is a fitted input being called a prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Methods, 'Linear spin wave theory (LSWT)']
    "By driving the system with the magnon frequency at the bottom of the gap at the mE (7), ñ=^X/R, we as expected excite magnons around the mE point."

    The drive frequency is set equal to the computed magnon gap bottom; the resulting magnon density is then centered at that same k-point. This is tautological: driving at the resonance frequency necessarily excites those modes. It does not independently establish that the 2.4 THz phonon is degenerate with the K-point magnon; that degeneracy was already put into the model via the renormalized exchange parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central OAM-compensation result is a genuine derived output of the spin-dynamics simulation: the OAM is computed from the emergent spiral phase fronts, not inserted by hand. However, the resonant mechanism claimed to generate those magnon wave-packets is constructed rather than predicted. The Methods explicitly state that the exchange interactions are renormalized so the K-point magnon energy exactly equals the 2.4 THz phonon frequency, and the dynamics are then driven at 2.4 THz; the resulting population of K-point magnons is therefore a consequence of an input, not an independent finding. The LSWT support repeats this by driving at the computed gap bottom and observing excitation there. These are fitted-input-called-prediction steps. The OAM identity Lz + ΔSz = 0 for a single-winding spiral is a mathematical consequence of the OAM definition, but the paper derives it from the simulation; this part is not circular, though its physical relevance depends on the unvalidated renormalization and the DFT-derived ΔQ coupling. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the existence of the exciton-driven magnons is conditioned on a resonance that was put into the calculation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated. The paper introduces 'hidden' large-momentum magnon wave-packets as an interpretation of experimental data, but this is a composite excitation, not a new fundamental entity. The main cost of the derivation is carried by the exchange renormalization and the ad hoc choices of phonon-modulation amplitudes, plus the inherited fitted parameters of the CrI3 spin model from ref 7.

free parameters (4)
  • Exchange renormalization factor = Adjusted so K-point acoustic magnon = 2.4 THz
    During ASD simulations: 'a renormalization in order to ensure that the top of the acoustic magnon band at the K point coincides with the frequency of the 2.4 THz phonon mode'. This is a parameter fitted to the target resonance.
  • Phonon-modulated exchange amplitudes ΔJ, ΔD = Not quoted numerically; chosen in linear regime from frozen phonon DFT
    Eq. M2: J(t) = J0 + ΔJ sin(ωt), D(t) = D0 + ΔD sin(ωt). The amplitudes are taken from frozen phonon calculations but the absolute scale is selected by hand ('confine ourselves to phonon amplitudes for which the modified exchange interactions display a linear variation'), not tied to measured fluence.
  • LSWT DMI perturbation strength Qx, Qy = 0.2 meV
    In the LSWT methods: 'here we have used Qx=Qy=0.2 meV'. This is an ad hoc choice for the perturbation, not derived from the DFT frozen phonon calculations.
  • LSWT Hamiltonian parameters J1, J2, J3, Dza, anisotropy = -2.11, -0.11, 0.1, 0.09, -0.123 meV
    Taken from ref 7, which fitted them to inelastic neutron data. They are inputs from prior literature, effectively free parameters that affect the magnon gap and dispersion.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Holstein-Primakoff and Bogoliubov transformations are valid for the CrI3 spin model at low temperatures
    Used in the LSWT section to diagonalize the spin-wave Hamiltonian.
  • standard math Linear response theory is applicable to the phonon-driven magnon generation
    Used to compute ⟨a_k⟩ and magnon density in LSWT.
  • domain assumption The exciton is localized to a single Cr atom and acts as a static center for phonon-driven spin dynamics
    Stated in methods: 'We assume that the exciton excites the 2.4 THz phonon mode and investigate how this in turn can drive magnetic excitations... assumed to be localized on a single Cr atom (11).'
  • domain assumption The 2.4 THz phonon mode modulates the magnetic exchange linearly, with sign and symmetry from frozen-phonon DFT
    Eq. M2 and methods: 'the sign and magnitude of ΔJij and ΔDij are then determined from symmetry analysis of the phonon modes combined with the calculated variation of the exchange interactions with lattice displacements.'
  • domain assumption The CrI3 spin Hamiltonian from ref 7 (Heisenberg exchanges plus DMI plus anisotropy) is an adequate description of the magnetic system
    Used in the LSWT: 'We use the spin model described in (7) and also their parameters.'
  • ad hoc to paper Exchange interactions are renormalized to force the K-point magnon frequency to match the 2.4 THz phonon
    Methods: 'The ASD simulations include all magnetic interactions calculated for the monolayer albeit with a renormalization in order to ensure that the top of the acoustic magnon band at the K point coincides with the frequency of the 2.4 THz phonon mode.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exciton-induced magnons carrying orbital angular momentum in CrI3." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5D2UMKKJ

@misc{pith2026260802010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exciton-induced magnons carrying orbital angular momentum in CrI3},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5D2UMKKJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02010}
}
read the original abstract

Magnons are collective spin excitations that contain and transport spin angular momentum in magnetic materials. It has been suggested that they can also carry orbital angular momentum in analogy to the electronic motion around the nucleus. We explore the real-space topology of magnon wave-packets emanating from atomic-like excitons in the ferromagnetic insulator CrI3 and demonstrate the existence of orbital angular momentum in such wave-packets. We reveal that orbital angular momentum of magnons is nearly equal to their spin angular momentum and compensates the latter. This illustrates the existence of an unexplored internal angular momentum balance and demonstrates that the magnetization can be quenched without the need of angular momentum exchange with the lattice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02010 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. CrI3 lattice, magnons, chiral spin torque and optical pump-probe measurements. (A) Real-space side (top panel) and top (bottom panel) view of a CrI3 with Cr ions marked as black and I ions as color small circles. The large yellow circles indicate excitons. (B) Exciton formation leads to the generation of coherent phonons of 3.9 THz and 2.4 THz frequencies and with displacements of the I ligands as schematically show… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Das Sarma

    Igor Zutic, Jaroslav Fabian, S. Das Sarma. Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phy. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Onose, T

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, Y. Tokura Observation of the Magnon Hall Effect. Science 329, 297 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Schäffer, Jamal Berakdar Twisted magnon beams carrying orbital angular momentum

    Chenglong Jia, Decheng Ma, Alexander F. Schäffer, Jamal Berakdar Twisted magnon beams carrying orbital angular momentum. Nature Commun. 10:2077, (2019)

  4. [4]

    Ryo Matsumoto, Shuichi Murakami Theoretical Prediction of a Rotating Magnon Wave Packet in Ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 197202 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    S. A. Owerre A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 386001 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Stone, Alexander I

    Lebing Chen, Jae-Ho Chung, Bin Gao, Tong Chen, Matthew B. Stone, Alexander I. Kolesnikov, et al. Topological Spin Excitations in Honeycomb Ferromagnet CrI3. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041028 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Stone, Alexander I

    Lebing Chen, Jae-Ho Chung, Matthew B. Stone, Alexander I. Kolesnikov, Barry Winn, V. Ovidiu Garlea, et al. Magnetic Field Effect on Topological Spin Excitations in CrI3. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031047 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    R. S. Fishman, Jason S. Gardner, Satoshi Okamoto Orbital Angular Momentum of Magnons in Collinear Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 167202 (2022)

    2022

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Neumann, Alexander Mook, Jürgen Henk, Ingrid Mertig Orbital Magnetic Moment of Magnons

    Robin R. Neumann, Alexander Mook, Jürgen Henk, Ingrid Mertig Orbital Magnetic Moment of Magnons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117209 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Stohr, H

    J. Stohr, H. C. Siegmann Magnetism: From Fundamentals to Nanoscale Dynamics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

    2006

  3. [11]

    Louie Physical origin of giant excitonic and magneto-optical responses in two-dimensional ferromagnetic insulators

    Meng Wu, Zhenglu Li, Ting Cao, Steven G. Louie Physical origin of giant excitonic and magneto-optical responses in two-dimensional ferromagnetic insulators. Nature Commun. 10:2371 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Koopmans, G

    B. Koopmans, G. Malinowski, F. Dalla Longa, D. Steiauf, M. Fähnle, T. Roth, M. Cinchetti, M. Aeschlimann Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laser-induced demagnetization. Nat. Mater. 9, 259–265 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Andrei Kirilyuk, Alexei. V. Kimel, Theo Rasing Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Bürgler, Fangzhou Wang, Zhenyan Lu, Lining Pan, et al

    Xiaowen Chen, Roman Adam, Daniel E. Bürgler, Fangzhou Wang, Zhenyan Lu, Lining Pan, et al. Ultrafast demagnetization in ferromagnetic materials: Origins and progress. Physics Reports 1102, 1 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Dornes, Y

    C. Dornes, Y. Acremann, M. Savioni, M. Kubli, M. J. Neugebauer, E. Abreu, et al. The ultrafast Einstein-de Haas effect. Nature 565, 212 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    S. R. Tauchert, M. Volkov, D. Ehberger, et al. Polarized phonons carry angular momentum in ultrafast demagnetization. Nature 602, 73–77 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Grzeszczyk, S

    M. Grzeszczyk, S. Acharya, D. Pashov, Z. Chen, K. Vaklinova, M. van Schilfgaarde, et al. Strongly Correlated Exciton-Magnetization System for Optical Spin Pumping in CrBr3 and CrI3. Advanced Materials 35, 2209513 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    X. Li, A. Wang, H. Chen, W. Tao, Z. Chen, C. Zhang, et al. Ultrafast Spontaneous Localization of a Jahn-Teller Exciton Polaron in Two-Dimensional Semiconducting CrI3 by Symmetry Breaking. Nano Lett. 22, 8755 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    W. He, J. Sears, F. Barantani, T. Kim, J. W. Villanova, T. Berlijn , et al. Dispersive Dark Excitons in van der Waals Ferromagnet CrI3. Phys. Rev. X 15, 011042 (2025). 8

    2025

  12. [20]

    C. A. Occhialini, L. Nessi, L. G. P. Martins, A. K. Demir, Q. Song, V. Hasse, et al. Spin-forbidden excitations in the magneto-optical spectra of CrI3 tuned by covalency. Phys. Rev. X 15, 031005 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    C. Gou, J. Zhang, Y. Mi, S. N. Luo Ultrafast carrier and coherent phonon dynamics in van der Waals ferromagnet CrI3. J. Mater. Chem. C 13, 3846 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Padmanabhan, F

    P. Padmanabhan, F. L. Buessen, R. Tutchton, et al. Coherent helicity-dependent spin-phonon oscillations in the ferromagnetic van der Waals crystal CrI3. Nature Commun 13, 4473 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Shokeen, M

    V. Shokeen, M. Pavelka, R. Chulkov, A. Yaroslavtsev, J. Rogvall, D. Muradas, et al. Non-equilibrium THz-phonon spin coupling in CrI3. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 3161 012026 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    D. M. Juraschek, R. M. Geilhufe, H. Zhu, et al. Chiral phonons. Nat. Phys. 21, 1532–1540 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Delugas, O

    P. Delugas, O. Baseggio, I. Timrov, S. Baroni, T Gorni Magnon-phonon interactions enhance the gap at the Dirac point in the spin-wave spectra of CrI3 two-dimensional magnets. Phys. Rev. B 107, 214452 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Holanda, D

    J. Holanda, D. S. Maior, A. Azevedo, S. M. Rezende, Detecting the phonon spin in magnon–phonon conversion experiments. Nature Phys. 14, 500 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Ghosh, H

    A. Ghosh, H. J. M. Jönsson, D. J. Mukkattukavil, Y. Kvashnin, D. Phuyal, P. Thunström, et al. Magnetic Circular Dichroism in the d-d Excitation in the van Der Waals Magnet CrI3 Probed by Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering. Phys. Rev. B 107, 115148 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Ghosh, D

    A. Ghosh, D. Singh, T. Armaki, Qingge Mu, V. Borisov, Y. Kvashnin, et al. Exotic magnetic and electronic properties of layered CrI3 single crystals under high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 105, L081104 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Jonak, E

    M. Jonak, E. Walendy, J. Arneth, M. Abdel-Hafiez, R. Klingeler. Low-energy magnon excitations and emerging anisotropic nature of short-range order in CrI3. Phys. Rev. B 106, 214412 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Zhang, M

    T. Zhang, M. Grzeszczyk, J. Li, W. Yu, H. Xu, P. He, et al. Degradation Chemistry and Kinetic Stabilization of Magnetic CrI3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 5295 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Mat. Sci. 6, 15 (1996); G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basi...

    1996

  24. [32]

    Atsushi Togo, Laurent Chaput, Terumasa Tadano, Isao Tanaka Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35, 353001-1-22 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    Grimme, S

    S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, L. Goerigk Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Y. O. Kvashnin, A. Bergman, A. I Lichtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson Relativistic exchange interactions in CrX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 102, 115162 (2020)

    2020

  28. [37]

    Atomistic Spin Dynamics: Foundations and Applications (Oxford, 2017; online edn, Oxford Academic, 18 May 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198788669.001.0001

    Olle Eriksson, et al. Atomistic Spin Dynamics: Foundations and Applications (Oxford, 2017; online edn, Oxford Academic, 18 May 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198788669.001.0001. 9 Acknowledgments: The Wallenberg Initiative Materials Science for Sustainability (WISE) fu...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.