Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 112 references

The paper argues that stripped-envelope interacting supernovae are a binary phenomenon: only circum-binary discs, never single-star winds, reproduce the observed light curves.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Using BPASS, only binary progenitors whose mass loss forms a circum-binary disc reproduce the luminosities and rise times of stripped-envelope interacting supernovae.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid, honest population synthesis screen; the binary/CBD result is plausible and the radio strategy is useful, but the 'no single stars' claim rests on a wind prescription the authors themselves admit is wrong for most of their events. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.02022 v1 pith:RIFXWXDR submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.HE

The progenitors and circumstellar environments of stripped-envelope interacting supernovae from BPASS

B. Warwick , J. Lyman , D. L. Coppejans , C. M. Byrne , J. J. Eldridge , M. Pursiainen , E. R. Stanway This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords stripped-envelope interacting supernovaeType Ibn supernovaeType Icn supernovaecircum-binary disccircumstellar materialBPASS stellar evolutionsupernova progenitorsradio synchrotron emission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Stripped-envelope interacting supernovae (SEISNe)—rare hydrogen-poor explosions such as Type Ibn and Icn that show intense interaction with surrounding matter—have unclear progenitors. This paper uses the BPASS stellar evolution model grid, 30,153 models spanning 13 metallicities, to reconstruct what surrounds each progenitor during its last 100,000 years and to compute what the resulting supernova light curve would look like. It finds that a spherically symmetric wind produced by any model, including all single stars, cannot make the circumstellar material dense enough close to the star to match observed SEISNe. Only scenarios in which Roche lobe overflow builds a circum-binary disc—a disc of material orbiting both stars—reproduce the observed peak luminosities and rise times, at rates consistent with the observed fraction of Ibn events. The paper concludes that, without additional phenomena such as eruptive mass loss, SEISNe require massive stars in binary systems.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that the observed peak luminosities and rise times of stripped-envelope interacting supernovae can be produced by binary progenitors whose mass transfer in the last 100,000 years concentrates material into a circum-binary disc, and that no single-star wind model in the grid can do so. The pure-wind scenario fails because wind mass loss spreads too little mass too far; placing the same RLOF-ejected mass into a compact disc yields the steep density profile required. The expected progenitors are primary stars in binaries with ZAMS masses of 14–40 solar masses at or above solar metallicity and 30–40 solar masses at lower metallicity. Radio modelling the

What carries the argument

The circum-binary disc (CBD) is the central object: material lost through Roche lobe overflow in the final 100,000 years is placed in a constant-density disc with a 10-degree opening angle between ~3 and ~100 times the binary separation, with winds either captured into it (upper density limit) or streaming through it (lower limit). The light curve is computed from an analytic inelastic-collision formula in which the supernova ejecta form a cold dense shell that sweeps up constant-density CSM shells, converting 100% of the lost kinetic energy into radiation, plus a fiducial 56Ni radioactive decay component. The diagnostic comparison is peak luminosity versus rise time against the observed Ibn

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on assuming the BPASS wind mass-loss rates and terminal velocities are correct in the final 100,000 years, including for stars ending below about 6 solar masses that are treated as Wolf-Rayet stars but are likely helium giants with weaker, slower winds—the models that supply 84% of the expected events.

What would settle it

A well-observed nearby (<50 Mpc) Ibn/Icn event with polarimetry indicating a line of sight away from any disc plane: if ALMA-class high-frequency (~100 GHz) observations within 8 days find no compact-disc synchrotron flare above the predicted flux, while single-star helium-giant models with corrected wind rates can match the light curve, the central claim would be refuted.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Single stars in the grid cannot power SEISNe light curves from wind mass loss alone; a binary companion, or some additional mass-loss mechanism like eruptions, is needed to make the CSM dense and close-in.
  • SEISNe should be preferentially found in high star-formation, high-metallicity environments, because at super-solar metallicity the progenitors are 14–40 Msun primaries while at sub-solar metallicity only 30–40 Msun primaries work.
  • The predicted rate from the wind-capture scenario (0.10% of core-collapse supernovae) is consistent with the observed Ibn fraction, and the free-streaming lower limit (0.026%) remains formally consistent.
  • Radio detection of a CBD requires observations within about 8 days and at frequencies above ~70 GHz for sources within about 100 Mpc, and only for viewing angles outside the disc plane; later or in-plane observations see only wind-dominated CSM.
  • Existing radio-derived CSM densities, probed beyond ~10^15 cm, agree with the wind component of the models and therefore do not test the disc scenario.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: because 84% of the expected events come from models whose final stars are helium giants rather than Wolf-Rayet stars, and those giants probably have slower, weaker winds, correcting that assumption could shrink the matching parameter space and shift it toward the free-streaming limit; the binary conclusion would survive only if such winds still fall short of building a dense clos
  • Beyond the paper: the same CSM reconstruction could be applied to Type Icn/Ien and other hydrogen-poor interacting transients, testing whether a continuum of stripping levels shares one binary-disc channel.
  • Beyond the paper: the disc geometry makes a testable polarimetric prediction—early observations within days of explosion should show higher polarization than later epochs, since the photosphere initially forms in the aspherical disc; the current late-time low-polarization measurements do not contradict this.
  • Beyond the paper: if eruptive mass loss proves common in massive stars, the strong claim that binaries are required would soften, but the rate match still leaves the binary-disc channel as the dominant explanation for the observed Ibn/Icn population.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper aims to constrain the progenitors of stripped-envelope interacting supernovae (SEISNe; Ibn/Icn) by combining the BPASS v2.2 single/binary stellar evolution grid with simple analytical CSM and interaction-powered light-curve models. From 30,153 hydrogen-poor core-collapse models, the authors reconstruct the CSM from the last 100 kyr of wind and RLOF mass loss under three geometric scenarios: a spherical pure-wind distribution; a circum-binary disc that captures intersecting wind ('wind capture'); and a CBD with freely streaming wind ('free streaming'). Using Eq. 5 for the interaction luminosity and a fixed 56Ni/ejecta ratio, they compare peak luminosity and rise time to a 1–20 d, 10^42–10^45 erg/s box. They find the pure-wind scenario (including all single-star models) cannot populate this box, while both CBD scenarios can, yielding event rates 0.10% and 0.026% of CCSNe; they infer binary progenitors with ZAMS masses ~14–40 M⊙ at ≥ Z⊙ and ~30–40 M⊙ below Z⊙. They also model radio synchrotron emission, concluding early (<8 d) high-frequency (≥70 GHz) observations are needed.

Significance. If the central result holds, it is an important population-level argument that SEISNe are produced by massive binaries with a CBD, with concrete predictions for rate, environment metallicity, and radio detectability. The paper's strengths include the large model grid (13 metallicities), the explicit three-scenario comparison, the use of independent observables (radio-derived CSM densities of Sfaradi et al. 2025), and an unusually candid discussion of caveats. The method is transparent and reproducible. However, the headline conclusion is sensitive to two admitted and partly contradictory modelling assumptions—the WR-like wind prescription applied to helium giants and the 100% kinetic-to-radiation efficiency—and the quantitative impact on the rates and progenitor ranges is not evaluated. The core comparison is internally consistent, but the robustness of the central claim is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3 / §4] The CSM is constructed using WR terminal velocities (Eqs. 3–4) and BPASS WR mass-loss rates for every selected model, including stars with final mass ≲6 M⊙ that the paper itself identifies as helium giants. Section 2.3 states that this difference 'does not influence the conclusions drawn from our modelling', but Section 4 states that models ending with mass ≲6 M⊙ make up 84 per cent of the total expected SEISNe and that 'correct helium giant mass loss rates would likely reduce our expected SEISNe from our models, and change the metallicity and initial mass model parameters to those seen in the free streaming scenario.' These statements are in direct tension. Because the pure-wind scenario is the basis for the headline exclusion of single-star progenitors, and because lower terminal velocities concentrate wind CSM closer to the progenitor, the central claim is not robust until this recali
  2. [§2.4 / Eq. (5) / §4] The light-curve luminosities assume 100 per cent conversion of CDS kinetic energy into radiation. The paper cites Khatami & Kasen (2024) as giving 10–50 per cent for the relevant CSM masses and radii. Since the 'match' condition is a hard cut at L_peak ≥ 10^42 erg/s, an efficiency reduction by a factor 2–10 could move a substantial fraction of the CBD models, and possibly the entire free-streaming scenario, below the threshold. The stated compensation (10° opening angle, constant-density disks) is plausible but is not quantified. Please propagate the efficiency range through the rates and progenitor-mass/metallicity maps, or provide an explicit bracketing of the selection.
  3. [§2.4 / §4] The adopted 56Ni-to-ejecta ratio of 1:14 is acknowledged to be likely too high for SEISNe (Moriya & Maeda 2016; Perley et al. 2022b). Although the interaction power is said to dominate at peak, the 'peak luminosity' used for the Fig. 4 selection includes the 56Ni contribution at the interaction peak. For models near the 10^42 erg/s boundary, the Ni contribution could decide membership. A short sensitivity test varying the ratio (e.g., 1:50 or 1:100) would remove this as a concern and strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.3] Typo: 'out modelling' should be 'our modelling' in the sentence 'We therefore assume for the rest of out modelling...'.
  2. [Figure 4] The figure overlays Type Ib (circles) and Type Ic (triangles) points alongside Ibn/Icn data, but the text defines SEISNe as Ibn/Icn. Please clarify whether the selection box is based on Ibn/Icn only or includes non-interacting stripped-envelope SNe, and whether this affects the interpretation.
  3. [§3.2.1 / Figure 6] The caption says 'Above the dot-dashed line all all the models that populate the region are merger models' (typo 'all all'), and the text states these are 'all single star models formed from mergers'. Please reconcile the wording: merger products are single stars in BPASS, but the sentence could be misread as excluding single-star channels.
  4. [§4] The Conclusions item (i) says 'we can not definitively state that binary interactions are required for SEISNe', whereas the Abstract states 'without phenomena such as eruptive mass loss, SEISNe require massive stars in binary systems'. Please harmonize the strength of the claim in the Abstract with the more cautious phrasing in the body.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the model grid, CSM construction, and comparison to observations are independent forward calculations; the helium-giant wind caveat is a robustness concern, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that only the two CBD scenarios, and hence no single-star models, reproduce SEISNe peak luminosities and rise times—is a forward-model result, not an identity. CSM density profiles are built from BPASS wind and RLOF mass-loss histories (Eqs. 3–4), disk geometry from independent literature (Tuna & Metzger 2023; Scherbak et al. 2025), and light curves from an analytic interaction model (Eq. 5 and Appendix B). No parameter is fitted to the observed SEISNe peak parameters; the observed region in Figure 4 is used only as a post-hoc selection box. The inferred rates come from IMF/star-formation weighting and are checked against observed rates, not derived from them. The use of BPASS is a self-citation, but the code is public, widely used, and validated against external constraints, so it is not load-bearing circularity. The one flagged caveat is an internal inconsistency: §2.3 asserts 'This difference in mass-loss does not influence the conclusions drawn from our modelling,' while §4 states 'correct helium giant mass loss rates would likely reduce our expected SEISNe from our models, and change the metallicity and initial mass model parameters to those seen in the free streaming scenario.' That highlights a real model-robustness problem—the adopted WR wind prescription is probably inappropriate for the ~84% of expected SEISNe from final-mass ≲6 M⊙ helium giants—but it does not reduce the derivation to its inputs by construction. The conclusion is not equivalent to the assumptions; correcting the wind rates could change the quantitative rates and mass/metallicity ranges, but that is a scientific uncertainty, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed accuracy of BPASS mass-loss prescriptions, the geometry and lifetime of the circum-binary disc, the analytical interaction-luminosity formula, and the choice of fiducial explosion input. These are stated in the text and are all domain assumptions from prior literature rather than new ad hoc inventions.

free parameters (7)
  • Kinetic-to-radiation conversion efficiency = 1 (100 per cent)
    Assumed in Appendix B; Khatami & Kasen (2024) estimate 10 to 50 per cent for relevant masses/radii. Inflates inferred peak luminosities and affects which models match.
  • 56Ni to ejecta mass ratio = 1:14
    Taken from Type Ib/Ic SNe (Lyman et al. 2016), likely too high for SEISNe; adds to early luminosity and could shift the match region.
  • CBD opening angle = 10 degrees
    Chosen as conservative lower bound from Scherbak et al. (2025) range of 10 to 30 degrees; larger angles increase interaction luminosity.
  • CBD inner and outer radii = 3a to 100a
    Set by eccentricity resonances and photo-evaporation (Artymowicz & Lubow 1994; Tuna & Metzger 2023); determines volume and density of the disc.
  • Wind terminal velocity prescription = Nugis & Lamers (2000) WR velocities for all models
    Applied even to helium giants, which likely have lower velocities and mass-loss rates; affects the density profile of wind CSM, especially in the pure wind scenario.
  • Ejecta kinetic energy = 10^51 erg
    Fiducial SN energy used to compute ejecta mass and velocity from BPASS binding energy; standard but not derived in this paper.
  • Radio equipartition parameters = p=3, epsilon_e=epsilon_B=0.1, gamma=0.7
    Used in synchrotron emission modeling for detectability predictions; chosen from typical supernova and shock assumptions.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Core-collapse selection via CO core mass thresholds (greater than 1.38 and less than 16.2 solar masses)
    Used to select 30,153 models; from Nomoto & Hashimoto (1988) and Maltsev et al. (2025).
  • domain assumption BPASS mass-loss rate prescriptions (de Jager, Vink, Nugis & Lamers, Schroeder & Cuntz) apply to the selected stripped stars
    CSM is built from these rates in Section 2.1. The paper later notes helium giants likely lose mass more slowly.
  • domain assumption RLOF mass loss forms a circum-binary disc with constant density between 3a and 100a
    Core geometry of the two CBD scenarios; from Artymowicz & Lubow (1994) and Tuna & Metzger (2023).
  • domain assumption The cold dense shell interaction converts kinetic energy to radiation with 100 per cent efficiency
    Appendix B sets e=1; later acknowledged as optimistic, with 10 to 50 per cent more realistic.
  • domain assumption Synchrotron emission follows Chevalier (1998) with equipartition and p=3
    Used for radio detectability predictions; from DeMarchi et al. (2022), Sfaradi et al. (2025).
  • domain assumption IMF (Kroupa 2001) and binary parameter distributions (Moe & Di Stefano 2017) are valid at all metallicities
    Used for rates and IMF-weighted statistics; applied uniformly across metallicities.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The progenitors and circumstellar environments of stripped-envelope interacting supernovae from BPASS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RIFXWXDR

@misc{pith2026260802022,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The progenitors and circumstellar environments of stripped-envelope interacting supernovae from BPASS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RIFXWXDR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02022}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Understanding the progenitors of stripped-envelope interacting supernovae (SEISNe) is crucial for probing the final stages of massive star evolution. Despite this, their rarity means the nature of their progenitors remains poorly constrained. We investigate the progenitors of SEISNe, using the Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis stellar evolution models. The 30,153 stellar models that result in hydrogen-poor core-collapse supernovae (SN) includes both binary and single stars, spanning 13 metallicities ($Z=10^{-5}$ to $0.04$). Circumstellar material (CSM) formation during their last 100\,kyr is reconstructed from line-driven and Roche lobe overflow (RLOF) mass loss using three scenarios for the CSM, one looking at a wind only distribution for the CSM, and two involving the formation of a circum-binary disc (CBD). Light curve parameters from each scenario are calculated using an analytical model and fiducial SN explosion parameters. We find only the two CBD scenarios, and consequently no single star models, reproduce the luminosities and rise times of observed SEISNe. The inferred rates are comparable to observations. Expected progenitors were only found in models with ZAMS masses of $14-40\,$M$_{\odot}$ at $\geq Z_\odot$ and $30-40\,$M$_{\odot}$ at $< Z_\odot$. Modelling the radio emissions shows that early ($\leq8\,$days) and high frequency ($\geq70\,$GHz) observations are required to constrain the nature of CBDs in these systems. These results indicate that, without phenomena such as eruptive mass loss, SEISNe require massive stars in binary systems in order to produce sufficient masses of CSM and confine them close to the progenitor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02022 by B. Warwick, C. M. Byrne, D. L. Coppejans, E. R. Stanway, J. J. Eldridge, J. Lyman, M. Pursiainen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The distribution of the models that passed all of our selection criteria by metallicity and model type. A description of each model type is given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Diagram showing the three different scenarios considered in our CSM modelling. Left: Both RLOF and wind material are distributed as a wind. Middle: RLOF material forms a CBD that captures all the wind within the disk’s opening angle, representing an upper limit on the density of the CBD. Right: RLOF material forms a CBD while the wind streams freely through it, presenting a lower limit on the density of th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example CSM density profile derived from a progenitor model with an initial mass of the primary star of 30 M⊙, a secondary star with a mass of 9 M⊙, an initial separation of 35.86 R⊙, with a metallicity of 𝑧 = 0.014. The lines represent the total mass density as a function of distance from the progenitor, decomposed by element. The shaded region shows the radius of the CBD for this progenitor model [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Heat map showing the range of peak values for modelled interaction light curves from the primary star BPASS models for our three scenarios, for the pure wind (top), wind capture (middle), and free streaming (bottom) models. The heat map level shows the expected number of SNe with the peak parameters per 106 M⊙. Peak luminosity is taken at the epoch of the peak interaction power including 56Ni decay at this… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The initial ZAMS mass and metallicity of the primary star in the models that result in interaction powered light curves with peak parameters in the same range as those from observed SEISNe. This is shown for two of our three scenarios: wind capture (left), and free streaming (right) models. Only these two scenarios are shown as the free streaming scenario could not produce peak parameters in the same range… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The heat map shows how many SN progenitors (per 106M⊙ ) have a CSM profile with the given density at the given radius (just prior to explosion). This gives an indication of the expected CSM densities weighted across all our models. The rate is the expected number of objects in the bin per 106 M⊙ of star formation. The observed densities of 22 Ibn SNe (derived from radio observations) from Sfaradi et al. (2… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Prospects for a 3𝜎 detection in a 1 hour observation of the radio synchrotron emission from the interaction between the SN blast wave and a CBD with the median density of all our model CBDs. We invesigate up to the maximum disk size in our models of 1015 cm. We account for synchrotron self-absorption, but not FFA. FFA is negligible outside the disk, so these results are vaild for observers with viewing ang… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Evaluating the impact of binary parameter uncertainty on stellar population properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1166 , archivePrefix =. 2004.11913 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    A new subclass of type II supernovae ?. , keywords =

  3. [3]

    , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =

    Optical Spectra of Supernovae. , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 1997

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    SN 2006jc: A Wolf-Rayet Star Exploding in a Dense He-rich Circumstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/513145 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0612711 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    A giant outburst two years before the core-collapse of a massive star. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature05825 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703663 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    SN 2021csp -- the explosion of a stripped envelope star within a H and He-poor circumstellar medium. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2108.07278 , archivePrefix =. 2108.07278 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07278

  7. [7]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =

    Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094901 , archivePrefix =. 1206.2503 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Handbook of Supernovae , year = 2017, editor =

    Supernova Progenitors Observed with HST. Handbook of Supernovae , year = 2017, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_126 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_126 2017

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    On the Progenitor of SN 2005gl and the Nature of Type IIn Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/510523 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608029 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    , year = 2009, month = apr, volume =

    A massive hypergiant star as the progenitor of the supernova SN 2005gl. , year = 2009, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1038/nature07934 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1038/nature07934 2009

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    A Massive Progenitor of the Luminous Type IIn Supernova 2010jl. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/732/2/63 , archivePrefix =. 1011.4150 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Observations of two distant Type Ibn supernova candidates discovered by La Silla-QUEST

    Massive stars exploding in a He-rich circumstellar medium - VI. Observations of two distant Type Ibn supernova candidates discovered by La Silla-QUEST. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv335 , archivePrefix =. 1502.04949 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    PS1-12sk is a Peculiar Supernova from a He-rich Progenitor System in a Brightest Cluster Galaxy Environment. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/39 , archivePrefix =. 1303.1818 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    SN 2023tsz: a helium-interaction-driven supernova in a very low-mass galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2784 , archivePrefix =. 2409.14147 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    A WC/WO star exploding within an expanding carbon-oxygen-neon nebula. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04155-1 , archivePrefix =. 2111.12435 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    The Type Icn SN 2021csp: Implications for the Origins of the Fastest Supernovae and the Fates of Wolf-Rayet Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac478e , archivePrefix =. 2111.12110 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    The Peculiar Type Ib Supernova 2006jc: A WCO Wolf-Rayet Star Explosion. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/591782 , archivePrefix =. 0711.4782 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Mass-transferring binary stars as progenitors of interacting hydrogen-free supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453426 , archivePrefix =. 2412.09893 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Population Synthesis Study on the Binary Origin of Type Ibn Supernovae

    Population Synthesis Study on the Binary Origin of Type Ibn Supernovae. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.00931 , archivePrefix =. 2506.00931 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00931

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Modeling the Panchromatic Spectral Energy Distributions of Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annuByrne et al 2022rev-astro-082812-141017 , archivePrefix =. 1301.7095 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Spectral population synthesis including massive binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15514.x , archivePrefix =. 0908.1386 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    The effect of stellar evolution uncertainties on the rest-frame ultraviolet stellar lines of C IV and He II in high-redshift Lyman-break galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19713.x , archivePrefix =. 1109.0288 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Re-evaluating old stellar populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1353 , archivePrefix =. 1805.08784 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    The photometric properties of galaxies in the early Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1154 , archivePrefix =. 1605.05044 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    and Charlot, S

    Wofford, A. and Charlot, S. and Bruzual, G. and Eldridge, J. J. and Calzetti, D. and Adamo, A. and Cignoni, M. and de Mink, S. E. and Gouliermis, D. A. and Grasha, K. and Grebel, E. K. and Lee, J. C. and Östlin, G. and Smith, L. J. and Ubeda, L. and Zackrisson, E. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw150 2016

  26. [26]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Davis, K W and Taggart, K and Tinyanont, S and Foley, R J and Villar, V A and Izzo, L and Angus, C R and Bustamante-Rosell, M J and Coulter, D A and Earl, N and Farias, D and Hjorth, J and Huber, M E and Jones, D O and Kelly, P L and Kilpatrick, C D and Langeroodi, D and Miao, H-Y and Pellegrino, C M and Ramirez-Ruiz, E and Ransome, C L and Rest, S and Si...

    2023

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    SN 2023emq: A Flash-ionized Ibn Supernova with Possible C III Emission. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad103d , archivePrefix =. 2306.09804 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  28. [28]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    Hoki: Making BPASS accessible through Python. The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =. 2020. doi:10.21105/joss.01987 , archivePrefix =. 2001.11069 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis Version 2.1: Construction, Observational Verification, and New Results. , keywords =. doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.51 , archivePrefix =. 1710.02154 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Long-term Evolution of Massive-star Post-common-envelope Circumbinary Disks and the Environments of Fast Luminous Transients. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acef17 , archivePrefix =. 2306.10111 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Mass-loss rates of Wolf-Rayet stars as a function of stellar parameters. , keywords =

  32. [32]

    2024 , address =

    Khatami, David Kyle-Lansangan , title =. 2024 , address =

    2024

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Explodability criteria for the neutrino-driven supernova mechanism. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554931 , archivePrefix =. 2503.23856 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Generalized Semi-analytical Models of Supernova Light Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/121 , archivePrefix =. 1111.5237 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Bolometric light curves and explosion parameters of 38 stripped-envelope core-collapse supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2983 , archivePrefix =. 1406.3667 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    The Observed Phase Space of Mass-loss History from Massive Stars Based on Radio Observations of a Large Supernova Sample. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9e93 , archivePrefix =. 2501.14028 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The nearby Type Ibn supernova 2015G: signatures of asymmetry and progenitor constraints. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1885 , archivePrefix =. 1704.04316 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Dynamics of Binary-Disk Interaction. I. Resonances and Disk Gap Sizes. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/173679 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/173679

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Gamma-Ray Transfer and Energy Deposition in Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/175834 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9501005 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Properties of Type Ibn Supernovae: Implications for the Progenitor Evolution and the Origin of a Population of Rapid Transients. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4672 , archivePrefix =. 2201.00955 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    The expanded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3266 , archivePrefix =. 1901.00906 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  42. [42]

    MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA , year = 2016, month = jan, eid =

    The MeerKAT Radio Telescope. MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA , year = 2016, month = jan, eid =. doi:10.22323/1.277.0001 , adsurl =

    doi:10.22323/1.277.0001 2016

  43. [43]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Supernova rates and luminosity functions from ASAS-SN II: 2014-2017 core-collapse supernovae and their subtypes. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.10985 , archivePrefix =. 2508.10985 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.10985 2014

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic Star-Formation History. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , archivePrefix =. 1403.0007 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    and Norman, C

    Langer, N. and Norman, C. A. , year=. On the Collapsar Model of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts:Constraints from Cosmic Metallicity Evolution , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1086/500363 , number=

    doi:10.1086/500363

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Rapid Binary Mass Transfer: Circumbinary Outflows and Angular Momentum Losses. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf067 , archivePrefix =. 2505.21264 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    The Landscape of Thermal Transients from Supernovae Interacting with a Circumstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad60c0 , archivePrefix =. 2304.03360 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Type Ibn Supernovae Show Photometric Homogeneity and Spectral Diversity at Maximum Light. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/158 , archivePrefix =. 1608.01998 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    The progenitors of core-collapse supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08041.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0405408 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2004

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    The Effects of Binary Evolution on the Dynamics of Core Collapse and Neutron Star Kicks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/421713 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0309588 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Ruling out a massive asymptotic giant-branch star as the progenitor of supernova 2005cs. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00285.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0701152 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    Xiao, Lin and Eldridge, J. J. , year=. Core-collapse supernova rate synthesis within 11 Mpc , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1425 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1425

  53. [53]

    Core-collapse supernovae ages and metallicities from emission-line diagnostics of nearby stellar populations , volume=

    Xiao, Lin and Galbany, L and Eldridge, J J and Stanway, Elizabeth R , year=. Core-collapse supernovae ages and metallicities from emission-line diagnostics of nearby stellar populations , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2557 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2557

  54. [54]

    Eldridge, J. J. and Guo, N. -Y. and Rodrigues, N. and Stanway, E. R. and Xiao, L. , year=. Supernova lightCURVE POPulation Synthesis II: Validation against supernovae with an observed progenitor , volume=. doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.31 , journal=

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.31 2019

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    On the nature of massive helium star winds and Wolf-Rayet-type mass-loss. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2712 , archivePrefix =. 2009.01849 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101737 , archivePrefix =. 0908.0700 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Observational Constraints on the Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae: The Case for Missing High-Mass Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.17 , archivePrefix =. 1504.02635 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    The Remarkable Deaths of 9-11 Solar Mass Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/34 , archivePrefix =. 1505.06712 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    On the variation of the initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0009005 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2001

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6 , archivePrefix =. 1606.05347 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Nonthermal processes in galactic and extragalactic sources

    Radio astrophysics. Nonthermal processes in galactic and extragalactic sources

  62. [62]

    Radiative processes in astrophysics

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Hydrogen-poor superluminous stellar explosions. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature10095 , archivePrefix =. 0910.0059 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Spectral Diversity in Type Ibn Supernovae and the Large Host Offset of SN2024acyl. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.03926 , archivePrefix =. 2511.03926 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03926

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    SN 2023xgo: Helium-rich Type Icn or Carbon-Flash Type Ibn supernova?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1517 , archivePrefix =. 2506.10700 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    The dependence of theoretical synthetic spectra on -enhancement in young, binary stellar populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac807 , archivePrefix =. 2203.13275 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Extremely stripped supernova reveals a silicon and sulfur formation site. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09375-3 , archivePrefix =. 2409.02054 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    A progenitor candidate for the type II-P supernova SN 2018aoq in NGC 4151. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834566 , archivePrefix =. 1812.04988 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    The landscape of binary core-collapse supernova progenitors and the late emergence of Wolf Rayet winds. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf884 , archivePrefix =. 2503.01993 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Fate of supernova progenitors in massive binary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1681 , archivePrefix =. 2311.14341 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Population Synthesis Revisited. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/169608 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/169608

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Spectral Evolution of Stellar Populations Using Isochrone Synthesis. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172385 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/172385

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Broad emission lines from the opaque electron-scattering environment of SN 1998S. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2001.04717.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0106234 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2001

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    The Demographics of Binary Companions to Stripped-Envelope Supernovae: Confronting Population Synthesis Models with Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2208 , archivePrefix =. 2508.12677 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Type Ibn Supernovae May not all Come from Massive Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aafc61 , archivePrefix =. 1901.03332 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    Synchrotron Self-Absorption in Radio Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305676 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/305676

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Radio Analysis of SN2004C Reveals an Unusual CSM Density Profile as a Harbinger of Core Collapse. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c26 , archivePrefix =. 2203.07388 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    Origins of Type Ibn SNe 2006jc/2015G in interacting binaries and implications for pre-SN eruptions. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3431 , archivePrefix =. 1909.07999 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Helium stars exploding in circumstellar material and the origin of Type Ibn supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142436 , archivePrefix =. 2111.13360 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Dinosaur in a Haystack: X-Ray View of the Entrails of SN 2023ixf and the Radio Afterglow of Its Interaction with the Medium Spawned by the Progenitor Star (Paper I). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc2fb , archivePrefix =. 2411.02647 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.