Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 65 references

Time reversal symmetry broken quantum spin hall effect in pseudospin-1 Dirac-Rashba system

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The quantum spin Hall phase can survive time-reversal symmetry breaking in a pseudospin-1 Dirac system, and transitions into QAH and second-order topological phases.

desk verdict Solid phase-diagram study of α-T3 with Kane-Mele, Rashba and exchange; the QAH part is new and credible, but the SOTI-to-SOTI transition claim needs a bulk invariant before it can stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02152 v1 pith:3WAUZOXH submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.mes-hall

Puspita Parui , Bheema Lingam Chittari This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantumspinHalleffecttime-reversalsymmetrybreakingpseudospin-1fermionsalpha-T3latticeprojectedspin-Chernnumberanomaloussecond-ordertopologicalinsulatorRashbaspin-orbitcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to the quantum spin Hall (QSH) phase when time-reversal symmetry is broken by an exchange field and spin conservation is broken by Rashba spin-orbit coupling in the pseudospin-1 α-T3 lattice. It argues that the QSH phase does not immediately vanish: it persists over a finite parameter regime and is characterized by a nonzero projected spin-Chern number, protected by a spin-spectral gap. The paper then shows that Rashba coupling drives two distinct quantum anomalous Hall phases, including a C=1 valley-polarized phase that exists only for intermediate α. For in-plane magnetization, the helical edge states gap out and the system hosts corner states, identifying second-order topological insulator phases separated by a transition at α equal to the exchange field. If right, the α-T3 lattice becomes a single tunable platform for spin-resolved, anomalous, and higher-order topological phases.

What carries the argument

The valence-projected spin-Chern number (PSCN) is the load-bearing invariant. It is computed by projecting the spin operator σz⊗I3 onto the occupied Bloch subspace, diagonalizing the resulting projector, and assigning Chern numbers to the positive and negative spin eigenspaces via the Fukui method, valid only when the projected spin spectrum (spin gap) is non-zero. This replaces the Z2 invariant when TRS is broken and sz is not conserved. The other central object is the α parameter itself, which interpolates between graphene and dice lattices and controls the phase boundaries, with valley-point eigenvalues providing analytic transition lines.

What would settle it

Compute the bulk nested Wilson loop or Wannier polarization for the in-plane magnetization phase with α>λ∥: if the bulk polarization is trivial, the claimed SOTI-to-SOTI transition is not a topological transition. Alternatively, in a nanoribbon calculation, check whether the corner states at α>λ∥ are pinned to zero energy only at the acute corners; if they hybridize with bulk states in larger flakes, the second-order phase is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, despite broken TRS, the QSH phase survives in the Kane-Mele α-T3 model with exchange and Rashba coupling, and is indexed by the projected spin-Chern number C_σ rather than the conventional Z2 invariant. The paper derives analytic valley-point phase boundaries and shows the QSH phase is robust up to an α-dependent critical exchange field; Rashba SOC reshapes the diagram, producing a C=2 QAH phase for all α and a C=1 valley-polarized QAH phase for 0<α<1, the latter arising entirely from the K valley. Rotating the magnetization in-plane gaps the first-order helical edge modes and produces zero-energy corner modes that persist for α<λ∥ and split into higher-energy corn

Load-bearing premise

The second-order topological insulator claim rests on finite-flake corner modes and a zigzag-edge gap crossing at α=λ∥; because no bulk SOTI invariant such as a nested Wilson loop or quantized Wannier polarization is computed, the distinction between the two SOTI phases could break down if those corner states are ordinary in-gap states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • QSH phases can be realized without time-reversal symmetry, indexed by the projected spin-Chern number, so the search for spin Hall materials need not be restricted to TRS-preserving systems.
  • The C=1 valley-polarized QAH phase, coming from a single valley, offers a route to valley-selective chiral edge transport in a spinful lattice.
  • In-plane magnetization provides a single-parameter knob to switch between two second-order topological phases, detectable through corner-state localization.
  • The α-T3 lattice interpolates graphene and dice limits, giving a tunable platform to access QSH, two QAH, and SOTI phases in one model.
  • Spin-resolved topological invariants based on projected internal degrees of freedom may be exportable to layer or orbital pseudospin in multiband systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the SOTI phases are genuine, the α=λ∥ transition implies a bulk polarization switch that could be probed by nested Wilson loops; the paper does not compute these, so the second-order character of the two corner-state regimes remains an open quantitative question.
  • The valley-polarized C=1 QAH phase suggests that valley filtering and chiral transport could be combined in one device if the α-T3 model is realized in a cold-atom or oxide platform.
  • The dependence of phase boundaries on α may be measurable through transport gaps in nanoribbons, providing a direct experimental test of the analytic valley-point conditions.
  • Extending the PSCN construction to other pseudospin degrees of freedom, as the paper suggests, could unify spin-Chern, layer-Chern, and orbital-Chern descriptions in a single framework.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a Kane-Mele-type α-T3 (pseudospin-1) honeycomb model with intrinsic spin-orbit coupling, Rashba spin-orbit coupling, and ferromagnetic exchange of arbitrary orientation. The authors compute bulk phase diagrams as functions of α, out-of-plane exchange λ⊥ex, and Rashba λR, using the total Chern number and the projected spin Chern number (PSCN) to label insulating phases. They report that the QSH phase, characterized by nonzero PSCN, survives for finite out-of-plane exchange despite broken time-reversal symmetry, and that Rashba coupling generates two QAH phases, C=2 and a valley-polarized C=1 phase for intermediate α. For in-plane magnetization, they report second-order topological insulator (SOTI) phases with corner states, and claim a SOTI-to-SOTI phase transition at α=λ∥ex signaled by a zigzag-edge band crossing.

Significance. If fully established, the paper would extend spin-resolved topological classification to pseudospin-1 Dirac systems and identify the α-T3 lattice as a tunable platform for QSH, QAH, and SOTI phases. The bulk phase diagrams and analytical K/K′ gap conditions are useful, and the authors are careful to check the spin gap when computing the PSCN, an issue often overlooked. The edge-state analyses for the QSH and QAH phases are also concrete and well illustrated. However, the SOTI claim and especially the SOTI-to-SOTI transition currently lack a bulk topological characterization, and the valley-resolved Chern partition is not defined, leaving two load-bearing claims incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III C, Figs. 7 and 8] The SOTI-to-SOTI transition at α=λ∥ex is inferred from a zigzag-edge band crossing and from repositioning/energetic splitting of finite-flake corner modes. Since the bulk gap remains finite and no bulk second-order invariant (nested Wilson loop, Wannier-sector polarization, or edge polarization) is computed, the edge-only gap closing does not by itself establish a topological phase transition. The higher-energy modes for α>λ∥ex could be ordinary in-gap states induced by the in-plane exchange field rather than topologically protected corner states. Please compute a bulk SOTI invariant or revise the claim to an edge-mode crossing without asserting distinct SOTI phases.
  2. [Sec. III C and Appendix A] Appendix A explicitly states that for three occupied bands the projected spin spectrum is gapless in the SOTI regime, so the PSCN is not defined there. No alternative invariant is supplied for the SOTI phases. Thus the only evidence for SOTI is the existence of corner modes in a finite rhombic flake. This is insufficient to distinguish a second-order topological insulator from a trivial in-gap corner bound state, and it leaves the central SOTI claim without quantitative topological support.
  3. [Sec. III B] The paper states, without a definition, that valley-resolved Chern numbers are computed and give C_K=1 and C_K'=0. A valley Chern number requires a precise partition of the Brillouin zone (e.g., integration over a finite region around each valley or a smooth window function). Without this specification, the valley-Chern values are not uniquely defined, and the identification of the C=1 phase as a valley-polarized QAH phase is not fully supported. Please state the partition and show numerical convergence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General notation] The lattice is denoted α-T3 in the text but α-τ3 in several figure captions (Figs. 4, 5, 6). Please unify the notation.
  2. [Eq. (4)] The exchange term is written with c†_{i,s} c_{j,s′}, but an onsite exchange field should have i=j. If this is a typo, please correct.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption says '(a) λ_R=0 and (a) λ_R=0.05'; the second panel should be labeled (b).
  4. [Abstract/III B] The abstract describes the broken-TRS QSH phase as 'protected by a spin-spectral gap.' In the presence of Rashba coupling, however, the helical edge states acquire a small gap (Fig. 4b). The wording could be clarified to distinguish the bulk PSCN invariant from the absence of gapless edge transport.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: phase boundaries are obtained from the same Hamiltonian's eigenvalues, invariants are computed independently, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—QSH survival after TRS breaking, QAH phases, and SOTI corner modes—are derived by diagonalizing the model Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–7) and computing standard topological invariants. No parameter is fitted to a target outcome: the out-of-plane phase boundaries are obtained from explicit valley eigenvalues and gap-closing conditions (Sec. III A), and the projected spin-Chern number is computed by the non-Abelian Fukui method from the occupied subspace, requiring an independent spin gap. QAH phases are characterized by total Chern numbers, and the valley-polarized C=1 phase is checked with valley-resolved Chern numbers (Sec. III B). The SOTI section uses finite-flake corner modes and edge-band crossings, not a fitted quantity. Self-citations (Refs. 27 and 43) are contextual and are not the load-bearing evidence; the (2,0) QAH result also cites external Ref. 11, and the QSH baseline cites external Ref. 21. The paper itself notes a genuine limitation—Appendix A states that in the SOTI phase with three occupied bands the spin gap vanishes so the PSCN cannot be determined, and no bulk SOTI invariant is computed—but that is an evidentiary gap, not a reduction of a predicted result to its input. Therefore no step satisfies the standard for circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting; all parameters are Hamiltonian inputs scanned over ranges. The central calculation relies on standard topological band theory and the assumption that α-T3 tight-binding model is a faithful platform; no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Chern numbers computed by the Fukui discretized-BZ method correctly quantify band topology.
    Used throughout Sec. III A for C and C±; assumes sufficiently fine mesh and non-degenerate occupied subspace.
  • standard math Prodan projected spin Chern number is a valid invariant when the projected spin operator has a spectral gap.
    Method from Refs. [49-53], used to define C_s when [H,S_z]≠0.
  • domain assumption The α-T3 Kane-Mele-Rashba tight-binding model is a faithful description of pseudospin-1 Dirac-Rashba systems.
    Eqs. (1)-(4); hopping and SOC terms taken from prior α-T3 literature; no material-specific parameters beyond t, λI, λR, λex.
  • domain assumption Valley-resolved Chern numbers can be unambiguously assigned by partitioning the BZ around K and K′.
    Used to label the C=1 phase as valley-polarized; the partition/gauge procedure is not specified.
  • domain assumption Finite-flake corner modes and edge-spectrum gap closing are sufficient to identify SOTI phases.
    Sec. III C/Figs. 7-8 identify SOTI without a bulk invariant such as nested Wilson loop or quantized polarization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time reversal symmetry broken quantum spin hall effect in pseudospin-1 Dirac-Rashba system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3WAUZOXH

@misc{pith2026260802152,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time reversal symmetry broken quantum spin hall effect in pseudospin-1 Dirac-Rashba system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3WAUZOXH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02152}
}
abstract

The Quantum spin Hall (QSH) phase is conventionally understood to be protected by time-reversal symmetry (TRS). Here, we theoretically investigated the fate of the QSH phase in a pseudospin-1 fermionic $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$ system in the presence of a TRS-breaking ferromagnetic exchange field and spin-nonconserving Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Despite broken TRS, the QSH phase survives over a finite parameter regime and is characterised by a non-zero projected spin-Chern number $C_\sigma (\sigma = \uparrow, \downarrow)$, protected by a spin-spectral gap. In the absence of Rashba coupling, the QSH phase remains robust up to an $\alpha$-dependent critical exchange field. Rashba SOC qualitatively reshapes the phase diagram by driving transitions into two distinct quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) phases: a $C=2$ phase, irrespective of $\alpha$-values, and a $C=1$ phase for $\alpha \neq 0,1$, which is further identified as a valley-polarized QAH phase arising from a single valley. Rotating the magnetization to in-plane gaps out the first-order helical edge states and gives rise to second-order topological insulator (SOTI) phases that host localized corner states in suitable finite geometry. We further identify a topological phase transition between two different SOTI phases, mediated by nanoribbon edge states at an exchange field equal to $\alpha$. These results establish spin-resolved topology in a higher pseudospin system as well as the $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$ lattice as a versatile platform for engineering and controlling multiple topological phases through magnetic exchange and spin-orbit coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02152 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Phase diagram of the global bulk gap as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Phase diagram of bulk band gap in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Electronic spectrum of zig-zag edged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (upper panel) Calculated band structure of TRS bro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Energy spectrum of zigzag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. band structure of zigzag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The real-space energy spectra of Kane-Mele-Rashba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  3. [3]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells, science314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  4. [4]

    S. Tang, C. Zhang, D. Wong, Z. Pedramrazi, H.-Z. Tsai, C. Jia, B. Moritz, M. Claassen, H. Ryu, S. Kahn,et al., Quantum spin hall state in monolayer 1t’-wte2, Nature Physics13, 683 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Y. Shi, J. Kahn, B. Niu, Z. Fei, B. Sun, X. Cai, B. A. Francisco, D. Wu, Z.-X. Shen, X. Xu,et al., Imaging quantum spin hall edges in monolayer wte2, Science ad- vances5, eaat8799 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Liu, X.-L

    C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum anomalous hall effect in hg1−ymnyTe quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 146802 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    H. Li, L. Sheng, R. Shen, L. B. Shao, B. Wang, D. N. Sheng, and D. Y. Xing, Stabilization of the quantum spin hall effect by designed removal of time-reversal symmetry of edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 266802 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    W. Luo, D. Shao, M.-X. Deng, W. Deng, and L. Sheng, Time-reversal-breaking induced quantum spin hall effect, Scientific reports7, 43049 (2017)

    2017

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    S. Saha, T. Nag, and S. Mandal, Eightfold quantum hall phases in a time reversal symmetry broken tight binding model, Physical Review B103, 235154 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Y. Yang, Z. Xu, L. Sheng, B. Wang, D. Y. Xing, and D. N. Sheng, Time-reversal-symmetry-broken quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 066602 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Z. Qiao, S. A. Yang, W. Feng, W.-K. Tse, J. Ding, Y. Yao, J. Wang, and Q. Niu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in graphene from rashba and exchange effects, Phys. Rev. B82, 161414 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys. Rev. B34, 5208 (1986)

    1986

  5. [13]

    Xu and L.-M

    Y. Xu and L.-M. Duan, Unconventional quantum hall ef- fects in two-dimensional massive spin-1 fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B96, 155301 (2017). 11

    2017

  6. [14]

    Bercioux, N

    D. Bercioux, N. Goldman, and D. F. Urban, Topology- induced phase transitions in quantum spin hall lattices, Phys. Rev. A83, 023609 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    R. Shen, L. B. Shao, B. Wang, and D. Y. Xing, Single dirac cone with a flat band touching on line-centered- square optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B81, 041410(R) (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Raoux, M

    A. Raoux, M. Morigi, J.-N. Fuchs, F. Pi´ echon, and G. Montambaux, From dia- to paramagnetic orbital sus- ceptibility of massless fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 026402 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Illes, J

    E. Illes, J. P. Carbotte, and E. J. Nicol, Hall quanti- zation and optical conductivity evolution with variable berry phase in theα−T 3 model, Phys. Rev. B92, 245410 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    F. Li, Q. Zhang, and K. S. Chan, Novel transport proper- ties of theα-t3 lattice with uniform electric and magnetic fields, Scientific Reports12, 12987 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Tamang and T

    L. Tamang and T. Biswas, Probing topological signatures in an optically drivenα−T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B107, 085408 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Saleem, H

    L. Saleem, H. M. Abdullah, U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, and A. Manchon, Thermal transport properties of magnons on theα−T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 024416 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Wang and J.-F

    J. Wang and J.-F. Liu, Quantum spin hall phase tran- sition in theα−T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B103, 075419 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    B. Dey, P. Kapri, O. Pal, and T. K. Ghosh, Unconven- tional phases in a haldane model of dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B101, 235406 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Dey and T

    B. Dey and T. K. Ghosh, Floquet topological phase tran- sition in theα−⊔ 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 205429 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Bercioux, D

    D. Bercioux, D. F. Urban, H. Grabert, and W. H¨ ausler, Massless dirac-weyl fermions in a⊔ 3 optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A80, 063603 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Wang and Y

    F. Wang and Y. Ran, Nearly flat band with chern number c= 2 on the dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B84, 241103(R) (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    J. D. Malcolm and E. J. Nicol, Magneto-optics of mass- less kane fermions: Role of the flat band and unusual berry phase, Phys. Rev. B92, 035118 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Parui and B

    P. Parui and B. L. Chittari, Valley-polarized quantum anomalous hall and topological metal phase in a rashba- induced pseudospin-1 lattice, Phys. Rev. B112, 075133 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    M. W. Alam, B. Souayeh, and S. F. Islam, Enhancement of thermoelectric performance of a nanoribbon made of α- t 3 lattice, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter31, 485303 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    H.-L. Liu, L. Hao, J. Wang, and J.-F. Liu, Thermopower of the dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, 115141 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Tamang and T

    L. Tamang and T. Biswas, Spin-valley physics in anoma- lous thermoelectric responses of the spin-orbit cou- pledα-t 3 system with broken time-reversal symmetry, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 10.1088/1361- 648X/ae7c48 (2026)

    2026 doi

  23. [31]

    Illes and E

    E. Illes and E. J. Nicol, Magnetic properties of theα−T 3 model: Magneto-optical conductivity and the hofstadter butterfly, Phys. Rev. B94, 125435 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    A. D. Kov´ acs, G. D´ avid, B. D´ ora, and J. Cserti, Frequency-dependent magneto-optical conductivity in the generalizedα−T 3 model, Phys. Rev. B95, 035414 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Y.-R. Chen, Y. Xu, J. Wang, J.-F. Liu, and Z. Ma, En- hanced magneto-optical response due to the flat band in nanoribbons made from theα−T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045420 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    L. Chen, J. Zuber, Z. Ma, and C. Zhang, Nonlinear op- tical response of theα−T 3 model due to the nontriv- ial topology of the band dispersion, Phys. Rev. B100, 035440 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Han and Y.-C

    C.-D. Han and Y.-C. Lai, Optical response of two- dimensional dirac materials with a flat band, Phys. Rev. B105, 155405 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    D. O. Oriekhov and V. P. Gusynin, Optical conductivity of semi-dirac and pseudospin-1 models: Zitterbewegung approach, Phys. Rev. B106, 115143 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    S. F. Islam and P. Dutta, Valley-polarized magnetocon- ductivity and particle-hole symmetry breaking in a pe- riodically modulatedα−T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B96, 045418 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Li and Q

    F. Li and Q. Zhang, Valley-dependent electronic trans- port in quantum hall systems ofα-t3 model, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1978 (IOP Publishing,

    1978

  31. [39]

    Singh and G

    A. Singh and G. Sharma, Geometrical transport in pseudospin-1 fermions, Phys. Rev. B107, 245150 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    J. J. Wang, S. Liu, J. Wang, and J.-F. Liu, Integer quan- tum hall effect of theα−T 3 model with a broken flat band, Phys. Rev. B102, 235414 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Biswas and T

    T. Biswas and T. Kanti Ghosh, Magnetotransport prop- erties of theα-t 3 model, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter28, 495302 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Mondal and S

    S. Mondal and S. Basu, Topological features of the hal- dane model on a dice lattice: Flat-band effect on trans- port properties, Phys. Rev. B107, 035421 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Parui, S

    P. Parui, S. Ghosh, and B. L. Chittari, Topological prop- erties of nearly flat bands in bilayerα−T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B109, 165118 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    R. Soni, A. B. Sanyal, N. Kaushal, S. Okamoto, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Multitude of topological phase transitions in bipartite dice and lieb lattices with inter- acting electrons and rashba coupling, Phys. Rev. B104, 235115 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Cheng and G

    S. Cheng and G. Xianlong, Topological floquet bands in a circularly shaken dice lattice, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033194 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Tamang, T

    L. Tamang, T. Nag, and T. Biswas, Floquet engineering of low-energy dispersions and dynamical localization in a periodically kicked three-band system, Phys. Rev. B 104, 174308 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Benhaida, E

    O. Benhaida, E. Saidi, L. Drissi, and R. Ahl Laamara, Topological properties of bilayerα- t 3α-t 3 lattice in- duced by polarized light, Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies8, e2500064 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    K. W. Lee, M. J. A. Calderon, X.-L. Yu, C. H. Lee, Y. S. Ang, and P.-H. Fu, Floquet engineering of topological phase transitions in a quantum spin hallα−T 3 system, Phys. Rev. B111, 045406 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    D. N. Sheng, Z. Y. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. D. M. Hal- dane, Quantum spin-hall effect and topologically invari- ant chern numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 036808 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    Sheng, D

    L. Sheng, D. N. Sheng, C. S. Ting, and F. D. M. Hal- dane, Nondissipative spin hall effect via quantized edge transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 136602 (2005)

    2005

  43. [51]

    Prodan, Robustness of the spin-chern number, Phys

    E. Prodan, Robustness of the spin-chern number, Phys. Rev. B80, 125327 (2009). 12

    2009

  44. [52]

    K.-S. Lin, G. Palumbo, Z. Guo, Y. Hwang, J. Blackburn, D. P. Shoemaker, F. Mahmood, Z. Wang, G. A. Fiete, B. J. Wieder, and B. Bradlyn, Spin-resolved topology and partial axion angles in three-dimensional insulators, Nature Communications15, 550 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    S. a. d. A. Sousa-J´ unior, M. V. d. S. Ferraz, J. P. de Lima, and T. P. Cysne, Topological characterization of modi- fied kane-mele-rashba models via local spin chern marker, Phys. Rev. B111, 035411 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan74, 1674 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    Y. Ren, Z. Qiao, and Q. Niu, Engineering corner states from two-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 166804 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Lahiri and S

    S. Lahiri and S. Basu, Wannier charge center, spin re- solved bulk polarization, and corner modes in a strained quantum spin hall insulator, Phys. Rev. B109, 115424 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Lahiri and S

    S. Lahiri and S. Basu, Second order topology in a band engineered chern insulator, Scientific Reports14, 1880 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Seshadri, A

    R. Seshadri, A. Dutta, and D. Sen, Generating a second- order topological insulator with multiple corner states by periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B100, 115403 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Miao, Y.-H

    C.-M. Miao, Y.-H. Wan, Q.-F. Sun, and Y.-T. Zhang, Engineering topologically protected zero-dimensional in- terface end states in antiferromagnetic heterojunction graphene nanoflakes, Phys. Rev. B108, 075401 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    D. Zhu, M. Kheirkhah, and Z. Yan, Sublattice-enriched tunability of bound states in second-order topological in- sulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B107, 085407 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Miao, Q.-F

    C.-M. Miao, Q.-F. Sun, and Y.-T. Zhang, Second-order topological corner states in zigzag graphene nanoflake with different types of edge magnetic configurations, Phys. Rev. B106, 165422 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    C.-M. Miao, L. Liu, Y.-H. Wan, Q.-F. Sun, and Y.-T. Zhang, General principle behind magnetization-induced second-order topological corner states in the kane-mele model, Phys. Rev. B109, 205417 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    K. Bhattacharyya, S. Lahiri, M. Islam, and S. Basu, Hol- stein polaron in a pseudospin-1 quantum spin hall sys- tem: First- and second-order topological phase transi- tions, Phys. Rev. B110, 235432 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    M. Yang, S. Rahul, and G. Palumbo, Layer-resolved topological metals in the bilayer lieb lattice, arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.11009 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  57. [65]

    A. C. Tyner, C. Grindall, and J. H. Pixley, Decoupling the electronic gap from the spin chern number in spin- resolved topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B110, 214211 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.