Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 110 references

T$^2$exture: Sparsely Perturbed Thermal-to-Texture Imaging

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a sparsely illuminated thermal texture can be turned into a dense sequence by treating the active/passive residual as a video interpolation problem, improving PSNR by 6.66 dB on a simulated benchmark.

arxiv 2608.02192 v1 pith:MG3TVVMT submitted 2026-08-03 cs.CV

Jiashuo Chen , Cheng Dai , Yanan Hu , Fanglin Bao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords thermaltexturelong-waveinfraredactiveilluminationvideoframeinterpolationsource-offestimationresidualimagingpropagationLWIR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that thermal texture can be captured as the residual between an actively illuminated frame and its passive counterpart, and that this sparse evidence can be expanded into a dense time sequence using video frame interpolation. To do this, it reconstructs the missing passive state at each active frame, forms differential texture anchors, then propagates the anchors through time while conditioning on nearby passive frames for structure. On a simulated benchmark, the method adds a small number of parameters to a pretrained interpolation model and improves peak signal-to-noise ratio by 6.66 dB. If the approach holds on real scenes, thermal texture imaging becomes practical with a modest long-wave infrared source and no extra sensor.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the source-conditioned thermal texture residual X_alpha = [S_on_alpha − S_off_alpha]_+, which is defined to suppress passive emission and retain only the radiance contributed by the controlled source. The reconstruction machinery is a two-stage adaptation of a pretrained video frame interpolation model: Stage 1 estimates the missing source-off frame at active keyframes and forms sparse texture anchors; Stage 2 propagates these anchors across time by encoding the target time with Fourier features, extracting multi-scale passive structural context from nearby frames, and injecting that context into the decoder through zero-initialized residual adapters.

What would settle it

Take a low-emissivity, high-absorptivity object, illuminate it with the same long-wave infrared source for the same keyframe duration used in the paper, and measure its surface temperature immediately before and after illumination with a fast contact probe or thermal camera; if temperature rises measurably or the residual image decays over time after the source is turned off, the no-heating assumption fails and the residual contains a thermal transient. A complementary check is to run the full pipeline on two objects with identical geometry but very different thermal inertia and see whether re

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, under rapid quasi-steady paired acquisition, the nonnegative residual X = [S_on − S_off]_+ attenuates the passive self-emission background and approximates a source-induced reflected response, exposing localized material- and geometry-dependent texture. The paper further claims that reconstructing a dense sequence of this residual can be solved as a two-stage interpolation problem: first estimate the unobserved source-off passive state at each active keyframe to create differential texture anchors, then propagate those anchors to every target time while injecting nearby passive frames as structural context. The method demonstrates this on simulated renderings, wher

Load-bearing premise

The active LWIR illumination is assumed not to heat the surface during the brief source-on interval, so the difference between source-on and source-off frames is pure reflected radiance rather than a thermal transient.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dense thermal texture sequences can be obtained from a few active keyframes instead of continuous illumination or additional spectral/visible sensors.
  • The recovered texture is explicitly source-conditioned, meaning it reflects the geometry and spectrum of the active illumination, not a universal emissivity or temperature map.
  • Anchor spacing directly trades acquisition cost against fidelity: increasing the number of passive frames between active anchors from 1 to 10 drops PSNR from 40.10 dB to 31.40 dB.
  • Passive structural context is necessary: adding the target-time passive observation raises PSNR by roughly 3.4 dB over anchor-only propagation, with diminishing returns beyond five context frames.
  • The same adaptation recipe transfers across model scales with only 0.066–0.487M added parameters and under 2 ms latency overhead, enabling near-real-time operation at about 46 FPS for the smallest variant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims: because the residual is defined relative to a specific source direction and spectrum, the same scene would produce different texture maps under different active illumination angles; multiple such maps could be combined to estimate local shape or reflectance properties.
  • A natural extension is to apply the same differential active/passive formulation in the visible or near-infrared band, where the quasi-steady no-heating assumption is much easier to satisfy and the contrast mechanism is similar.
  • A direct test of the no-heating assumption would be to measure surface temperature before and after a source-on keyframe on a low-emissivity, high-absorptivity object; if the residual decays over time after source-off, the current texture definition would need an additional thermal-transient term.
  • The quantitative evaluation is largely synthetic; testing the pipeline against an independent physical ground truth, such as a synchronized visible reference or a controlled pattern painted on the target, would clarify how far the simulated gains carry into real deployment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes T2exture, a two-stage framework for reconstructing a temporally dense, source-conditioned thermal texture sequence from dense passive LWIR frames and a small number of actively illuminated keyframes. Thermal texture is defined as the nonnegative residual between a source-on observation and its corresponding source-off passive state under a rapid quasi-steady acquisition assumption. Stage 1 uses a pretrained video frame interpolation model (AMT) to estimate the unobserved source-off passive state at each active keyframe, forming differential texture anchors. Stage 2 adapts AMT with a lightweight texture-to-visual adapter and passive structural context to propagate these anchors to all target times. The method is evaluated on a simulated benchmark with paired renders and on six real LWIR sequences with no-reference metrics. The main reported result is a 6.66 dB PSNR improvement over AMT-L on the simulated benchmark with only 0.20M additional parameters, together with component ablations and robustness studies across model scales, active-keyframe spacing, and passive context size.

Significance. If the claims hold, T2exture offers a practical and lightweight way to recover thermal texture from sparse active illumination, addressing a real ambiguity in passive LWIR imaging (TeX-degeneracy). The simulated benchmark is carefully constructed with paired active/passive renders, and the ablations isolate the contributions of the adapter, passive guidance, and temporal modulation. The authors also release code and data, which supports reproducibility. The real-world evaluation, however, currently rests on no-reference metrics and qualitative inspection, and the central physical assumption that the active source does not heat the scene is not experimentally validated; these points weaken but do not destroy the paper's contribution.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3, Eq. (4)–(5)] The definition of thermal texture assumes the active source only changes the incident radiance over Ω_{2,α} and does not alter surface temperature T_α or emissivity e_{αν}. The rapid quasi-steady assumption is invoked but never validated on real objects. In the real setup (Supplement S1.2) a 130°C blackbody illuminates a 20°C target at 4.5 m; if any absorbed irradiance changes T_α during the active exposure, X_α contains a thermal transient and is no longer a purely reflected, source-conditioned texture. Please add an experimental check (e.g., repeated source-on frames with varying exposure, or a separate measurement of T_α during active illumination) or explicitly limit the claims to regimes where no-heating is verified.
  2. [§5.2, Table 3] The real-world evaluation uses no-reference metrics (En, AG, SD, SCD, PI) that reward contrast, detail, and cross-anchor consistency, not fidelity to true texture. Ours-L is highest on En, SD, and SCD but has lower AG and higher PI than AMT-L, so the text's claim of 'clearer texture recovery' on real sequences is supported mainly by Fig. 6. This is acceptable as a qualitative demonstration, but it is not evidence of physical correctness. Please add a perceptual study or a quantitative proxy with a ground-truth-comparable target (e.g., leave-one-out validation on a real sequence, or edge alignment against a human-labeled map) before claiming real-world superiority.
  3. [Algorithm S1 and §5.1/S3.2] At inference, the anchors X_k are computed from Stage 1 estimates \ hat{S}^off_k, but the Stage 2 training description does not state whether the simulated paired ground-truth S^off_k or the Stage 1 estimate is used to form anchors during training. If training uses clean ground-truth anchors and evaluation uses estimated anchors, the 6.66 dB improvement in Table 2 may not reflect the full inference pipeline. This is a train/inference mismatch that could materially affect the headline claim. Please specify the exact anchor construction for Stage 2 training, and if needed, fine-tune with estimated anchors or inject Stage 1 noise.
  4. [§5.2, Table 2] The VFI baselines (IFRNet, SGM-VFI, BiM-VFI, GIMM-F, AMT-L) are not described as receiving the passive structural context C_t used by Ours-L. If they are queried only with the two sparse texture anchors X_0 and X_1, the comparison does not isolate the proposed method: the gain may be largely due to additional input information (target-time passive frame and neighbor source-off states) rather than the VFI adaptation. Please report baselines augmented with the same context (e.g., context channels as extra inputs), or clearly state that the comparison is against VFI without contextual inputs and add a context-augmented baseline for fairness.
  5. [§5.1, Supplement S1.1] The simulated benchmark uses a closed, Lambertian, atmospheric-absorption-free renderer with uniform emissivity 0.9 for all target surfaces. The texture signal is therefore dominated by geometry and source visibility, not by material-induced emissivity variation. The claim that the residual 'exposes localized material- and geometry-dependent texture' is only partially exercised. Please state this limitation explicitly and, ideally, include a scene variant with spatially varying emissivity to demonstrate that material-driven texture is recovered as well as geometry-driven texture.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.2, Table 3] The table lists PI values where lower is better; Ours-L has 5.384, worse than AMT-L's 5.175, but the text says 'higher En, SD, and SCD' without noting the PI trade-off. State this explicitly for balance.
  2. [§1, Notation] The set of active keyframes is sometimes written as K and sometimes as \mathcal{K}; please use a single notation throughout to avoid confusion with the passive set K.
  3. [Supplement S2.2, Eq. (S13)] The SCD metric uses 'common grayscale normalization' of A and B; the normalization details are not specified. Please define it precisely.
  4. [Figure 2] The caption says 'RGB visualizations rendered from surface normals'; these are not RGB visualizations. Please rephrase to avoid confusion.
  5. [§4.3, Eq. (12)] The temporal modulation c_t is added to G_t^1; if c_t is a vector added to feature maps, state the broadcasting behavior. Minor clarity issue.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reconstruction is a supervised empirical method trained against an explicitly defined target, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

T2exture's target is explicitly defined in Eq. (5) as X = [S_on - S_off]^+; the paper does not claim to derive this quantity from first principles, it defines it and then learns to reconstruct it. Stage 1 uses a fixed pretrained AMT model to estimate unobserved source-off states from neighboring passive frames (Eq. 7) and forms anchors by subtraction (Eq. 8); no parameter is fitted to the texture target at this stage, so the anchors are not a fitted prediction. Stage 2 is trained with the true simulated texture in the Charbonnier/census/flow loss (Eqs. S20-S26), and the reported PSNR improvement is evaluated on an object-disjoint held-out simulated split, so the performance claim is an empirical result rather than a quantity forced by construction. The loss weights are hand-set but do not encode the target output. Self-citations to Bao et al. 2023/2024 provide background on TeX-degeneracy and standard thermal radiance formation; they are not used as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or to forbid alternative approaches. The quasi-steady, no-heating acquisition assumption is a physical validity limitation, not a circular step. No circularity is apparent.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is minimal because the paper's contribution is an empirical method built on existing interpolators, not a new physical model. The main hand-chosen values are experimental settings; the most speculative assumption is the lack of thermal perturbation by the active source.

free parameters (5)
  • Loss weights (λ_char, λ_css, λ_flow) = 1.0, 0.1, 1e-3
    Set empirically in Section 4.4 to balance reconstruction, census, and flow losses.
  • Active keyframe interval (stride) = 10 frames
    Chosen for the main benchmark; Table 6 shows performance degrades with larger intervals.
  • Passive context radius r = 2 (|Ct|=5)
    Selected in Section 5.3 based on saturation of performance.
  • Source temperature (real benchmark) = 130°C
    Chosen for real captures; not swept.
  • Number of render bounces N = 4
    Set in supplement S1.1 for numerical stabilization.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quasi-steady thermal regime: surface temperature, atmosphere, and geometry do not change over the acquisition interval.
    Invoked in Section 3 to justify the source-on/source-off subtraction as a pure radiance residual.
  • domain assumption The surface is opaque, Lambertian, and in local thermal equilibrium.
    Used to derive Eq. (2) and the reflection integral in Eq. (3).
  • domain assumption Atmospheric transmittance ≈ 1 in the 8–12 µm band, so path emission is negligible.
    Stated in Section 3 to simplify Eq. (1) to S = S_surf.
  • ad hoc to paper The controlled source changes only the incident radiance on the source-visible domain, without altering surface temperature or the rest of the environment.
    This is the key modeling assumption behind the texture definition X = [S_on - S_off]^+; it is not validated experimentally in the paper.
  • domain assumption The pretrained AMT model provides a transferable prior for thermal texture interpolation.
    Assumed in Section 4.3; empirical results support it on the tested datasets.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of T$^2$exture: Sparsely Perturbed Thermal-to-Texture Imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MG3TVVMT

@misc{pith2026260802192,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: T$^2$exture: Sparsely Perturbed Thermal-to-Texture Imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MG3TVVMT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02192}
}
abstract

Thermal imaging remains effective under adverse illumination, yet passive long-wave infrared (LWIR) measurements often lack fine texture. Existing thermal texture imaging approaches commonly rely on spectral sensing or registered auxiliary modalities, incurring substantial data throughput or vulnerability to cross-modal degradation. We introduce T$^2$exture, a sparsely perturbed thermal texture imaging framework that aims to reconstruct temporally dense thermal texture sequences from densely sampled passive frames and a few actively perturbed keyframes. We define thermal texture as the residual between a source-on observation and its corresponding source-off passive state. Under sparse LWIR illumination and rapid quasi-steady paired acquisition, this residual attenuates the passive-emission background and approximates a source-induced reflected response, exposing localized material- and geometry-dependent texture. T$^2$exture reconstructs a dense sequence of this source-conditioned response through two stages. Stage 1 estimates the unobserved source-off passive state at each active instant from neighboring passive frames to obtain reliable differential texture anchors. Stage 2 combines sparse anchors with passive structural context near each target time to reconstruct the dense sequence. On the simulated benchmark, T$^2$exture adds only 0.20M parameters to AMT-L while improving PSNR by 6.66 dB. Extensive evaluations on simulated and real acquisitions further show clearer texture recovery and stronger structural preservation than representative VFI baselines. These results establish T$^2$exture as a practical framework for thermal texture imaging under sparse active acquisition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02192 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic overview of T 2 exture. Stage 1 estimates each active keyframe’s source-off passive state to obtain sparse texture anchors. Stage 2 combines these anchors with passive￾frame structure in an adapted video frame interpolation (VFI) model to reconstruct the sequence. of emissivity, temperature, and environmental radiance can produce similar observations—a phenomenon termed TeX￾degeneracy (Bao et al. 2023, 202… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Four samples from our dataset. Rows show thermal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of T2 exture second Stage framework. The T2V-Adapter maps texture anchors to the AMT feature space (Li et al. 2023), while convolutional adapters inject multi-scale passive context into its decoder to synthesize Xˆ t. residual with a different numerical distribution. We there￾fore introduce a lightweight texture-to-visual (T2V) adapter Aϕ before the pretrained AMT encoder. The adapter first replicates t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stage 1 source-off-state prediction. From adjacent passive frames, AMT-L predicts the intermediate source-off passive state; the rightmost column shows the error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative reconstruction comparison on the simulated benchmark. Each row shows sparse anchors, the target-time passive observation, ground truth, prior VFI results, and Ours-L. Insets enlarge selected regions of interest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative reconstruction comparison on real-world sequences. Each row shows two sparse active anchors, the passive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Nature , volume=

    Heat-assisted detection and ranging , author=. Nature , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  2. [2]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Why thermal images are blurry , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  3. [3]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Absorption-Based Hyperspectral Thermal Ranging: Performance Analyses, Optimization, and Simulations , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  4. [4]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

    Absorption-Based, Passive Range Imaging from Hyperspectral Thermal Measurements , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  5. [5]

    IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , volume=

    Ozone Cues Mitigate Reflected Downwelling Radiance in LWIR Absorption-Based Ranging , author=. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  6. [6]

    A Novel Land Surface Temperature Retrieval Method Using Channel Correlation for Atmospheric Parameter Modeling from

    Cao, Li-Qin and Zhao, Hang and Wang, Du and Zhong, Yan-Fei and Ye, Fa-Wang , journal=. A Novel Land Surface Temperature Retrieval Method Using Channel Correlation for Atmospheric Parameter Modeling from. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  7. [8]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Edge-Enhanced Infrared Image Super-Resolution Reconstruction Model Under Transformer , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  8. [9]

    , title=

    Zuiderveld, Karel J. , title=. Graphics Gems IV , editor=. 1994 , doi=

    1994

Show all 110 references
  1. [10]

    Remote Sensing , volume=

    Liu, Chengwei and Sui, Xiubao and Kuang, Xiaodong and Liu, Yuan and Gu, Guohua and Chen, Qian , title=. Remote Sensing , volume=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  2. [11]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

    Mask-DiFuser: A Masked Diffusion Model for Unified Unsupervised Image Fusion , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  3. [12]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    DDFM: Denoising Diffusion Model for Multi-Modality Image Fusion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  4. [13]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    CDDFuse: Correlation-Driven Dual-Branch Feature Decomposition for Multi-Modality Image Fusion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  5. [14]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    MetaFusion: Infrared and Visible Image Fusion via Meta-Feature Embedding from Object Detection , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  6. [15]

    Pattern Recognition , volume=

    Infrared and Visible Image Fusion via Dual Encoder Based on Dense Connection , author=. Pattern Recognition , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  7. [16]

    2026 , eprint=

    Universal Computational Thermal Imaging Overcoming the Ghosting Effect , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  8. [19]

    Thermal Voyager: A Comparative Study of

    Ng, Aditya and Dhruval, PB and Shalabi, Jehan and Jape, Shubhankar and Wang, Xueji and Jacob, Zubin , booktitle=. Thermal Voyager: A Comparative Study of

  9. [20]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    TrafficNight: An Aerial Multimodal Benchmark for Nighttime Vehicle Surveillance , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  10. [21]

    Mirlach, Jonas and Wan, Lei and Wiedholz, Andreas and Keen, Hannan Ejaz and Eich, Andreas , booktitle=

  11. [22]

    and Laiolo, M

    Aveni, S. and Laiolo, M. and Campus, A. and Massimetti, F. and Coppola, D. , journal=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  12. [23]

    Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from

    Teng, Yuanjian and Ren, Huazhong and Hu, Yonghong and Dou, Changyong , journal=. Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  13. [24]

    Cell Reports Physical Science , volume=

    Hyperspectral Phasor Thermography , author=. Cell Reports Physical Science , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  14. [25]

    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research , volume=

    The Diagnostic Accuracy of Infrared Thermography in Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Prospective Study , author=. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  15. [26]

    Teed, Zachary and Deng, Jia , booktitle=

  16. [27]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Learning To Estimate Hidden Motions With Global Motion Aggregation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  17. [28]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Unsupervised Learning-Enabled Pulsed Infrared Thermographic Microscopy of Subsurface Defects in Stainless Steel , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  18. [29]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , volume=

    Effect of Signal Modulation on Active Microwave Thermography , author=. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  19. [30]

    NDT & E International , volume=

    Simultaneous Multi-Frequency Lock-In Thermography: A New Flexible and Effective Active Thermography Scheme , author=. NDT & E International , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  20. [31]

    2020 , doi=

    Erdozain, Jack and Ichimaru, Kazuto and Maeda, Tomohiro and Kawasaki, Hiroshi and Raskar, Ramesh and Kadambi, Achuta , booktitle=. 2020 , doi=

    2020

  21. [32]

    High-Resolution Sequential Thermal Fringe Projection Technique for Fast and Accurate

    Landmann, Martin and Speck, Henri and Dietrich, Patrick and Heist, Stefan and K. High-Resolution Sequential Thermal Fringe Projection Technique for Fast and Accurate. Applied Optics , volume=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  22. [33]

    Analysis of the Measurement Accuracy of a Thermal

    Speck, Henri and Landmann, Martin and Ramm, Roland and Heist, Stefan and K. Analysis of the Measurement Accuracy of a Thermal. Measurement , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  23. [34]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Projecting Trackable Thermal Patterns for Dynamic Computer Vision , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  24. [35]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , year=

    Real-Time Intermediate Flow Estimation for Video Frame Interpolation , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , year=

  25. [36]

    Kong, Lingtong and Jiang, Boyuan and Luo, Donghao and Chu, Wenqing and Huang, Xiaoming and Tai, Ying and Wang, Chengjie and Yang, Jie , booktitle=

  26. [37]

    Li, Zhen and Zhu, Zuo-Liang and Han, Ling-Hao and Hou, Qibin and Guo, Chun-Le and Cheng, Ming-Ming , booktitle=

  27. [38]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Perception-Oriented Video Frame Interpolation via Asymmetric Blending , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  28. [39]

    Seo, Wonyong and Oh, Jihyong and Kim, Munchurl , booktitle=

  29. [40]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Hierarchical Flow Diffusion for Efficient Frame Interpolation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  30. [41]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Sparse Global Matching for Video Frame Interpolation with Large Motion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  31. [42]

    2025 , doi=

    Zhang, Zihao and Chen, Haoran and Zhao, Haoyu and Lu, Guansong and Fu, Yanwei and Xu, Hang and Wu, Zuxuan , booktitle=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  32. [43]

    Lyu, Zonglin and Chen, Chen , booktitle=

  33. [44]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Towards Holistic Modeling for Video Frame Interpolation with Auto-Regressive Diffusion Transformers , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  34. [45]

    Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Video Frame Interpolation via Adaptive Separable Convolution , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2017 , doi=

    2017

  35. [46]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=. 2020 , url=

    2020

  36. [47]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Generalizable Implicit Motion Modeling for Video Frame Interpolation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  37. [48]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

    A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=. 1986 , doi=

    1986

  38. [49]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

    Contour Detection and Hierarchical Image Segmentation , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=. 2011 , doi=

    2011

  39. [50]

    2013 , doi=

    Health Physics , volume=. 2013 , doi=

    2013

  40. [51]

    2014 , howpublished=

    2014

  41. [52]

    2024 , doi=

    Mou, Chong and Wang, Xintao and Xie, Liangbin and Wu, Yanze and Zhang, Jian and Qi, Zhongang and Shan, Ying , booktitle=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  42. [53]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  43. [54]

    Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing , volume=

    Two Deterministic Half-Quadratic Regularization Algorithms for Computed Imaging , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing , volume=. 1994 , doi=

    1994

  44. [55]

    2018 , doi=

    Meister, Simon and Hur, Junhwa and Roth, Stefan , booktitle=. 2018 , doi=

    2018

  45. [56]

    Information Fusion , volume=

    New Insights into Multi-Focus Image Fusion: A Fusion Method Based on Multi-Dictionary Linear Sparse Representation and Region Fusion Model , author=. Information Fusion , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  46. [57]

    AEU -- International Journal of Electronics and Communications , volume=

    A New Image Quality Metric for Image Fusion: The Sum of the Correlations of Differences , author=. AEU -- International Journal of Electronics and Communications , volume=. 2015 , doi=

    2015

  47. [58]

    and Sheikh, Hamid R

    Wang, Zhou and Bovik, Alan C. and Sheikh, Hamid R. and Simoncelli, Eero P. , title =. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  48. [59]

    , title =

    Mittal, Anish and Soundararajan, Rajiv and Bovik, Alan C. , title =. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  49. [60]

    Computer Vision and Image Understanding , volume =

    Ma, Chao and Yang, Chih-Yuan and Yang, Xiaokang and Yang, Ming-Hsuan , title =. Computer Vision and Image Understanding , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  50. [61]

    Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , year =

    Blau, Yochai and Mechrez, Roey and Timofte, Radu and Michaeli, Tomer and Zelnik-Manor, Lihi , title =. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , year =

  51. [63]

    Arbel \'a ez, P.; Maire, M.; Fowlkes, C.; and Malik, J. 2011. Contour Detection and Hierarchical Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33(5): 898--916

    2011

  52. [64]

    Aslantas, V.; and Bendes, E. 2015. A New Image Quality Metric for Image Fusion: The Sum of the Correlations of Differences. AEU -- International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 69(12): 1890--1896

    2015

  53. [65]

    Aveni, S.; Laiolo, M.; Campus, A.; Massimetti, F.; and Coppola, D. 2024. TIRVolcH : Thermal Infrared Recognition of Volcanic Hotspots: A Single-Band TIR -Based Algorithm to Detect Low-to-High Thermal Anomalies in Volcanic Regions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 315: 114388

    2024

  54. [66]

    E.; and Jacob, Z

    Bao, F.; Jape, S.; Schramka, A.; Wang, J.; McGraw, T. E.; and Jacob, Z. 2024. Why thermal images are blurry. Optics Express, 32(3): 3852--3865

    2024

  55. [67]

    H.; Sreekumar, G.; Yang, L.; Aggarwal, V.; Boddeti, V

    Bao, F.; Wang, X.; Sureshbabu, S. H.; Sreekumar, G.; Yang, L.; Aggarwal, V.; Boddeti, V. N.; and Jacob, Z. 2023. Heat-assisted detection and ranging. Nature, 619(7971): 743--748

    2023

  56. [68]

    Blau, Y.; Mechrez, R.; Timofte, R.; Michaeli, T.; and Zelnik-Manor, L. 2018. The 2018 PIRM Challenge on Perceptual Image Super-Resolution. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision Workshops

    2018

  57. [69]

    Canny, J. 1986. A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-8(6): 679--698

    1986

  58. [70]

    Charbonnier, P.; Blanc-F \'e raud, L.; Aubert, G.; and Barlaud, M. 1994. Two Deterministic Half-Quadratic Regularization Algorithms for Computed Imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, volume 2, 168--172

    1994

  59. [71]

    Dai, C.; Lin, J.; Song, B.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J.; Yuan, X.; and Bao, F. 2026 a . HADAR -Based Thermal Infrared Hyperspectral Image Restoration. arXiv:2605.13664

    2026 arXiv

  60. [72]

    Dai, C.; Lin, J.; Xu, H.; Song, B.; Xie, Z.; and Bao, F. 2026 b . TeX -1500: A Paired Real-World LWIR Hyperspectral Dataset and Benchmark for Temperature-Emissivity-Texture Decomposition. arXiv:2606.03806

    2026 arXiv

  61. [73]

    J.; and Goyal, V

    Dorken Gallastegi, U.; Rueda-Chac \'o n, H.; Stevens, M. J.; and Goyal, V. K. 2025. Absorption-Based, Passive Range Imaging from Hyperspectral Thermal Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 47(5): 4044--4060

    2025

  62. [74]

    J.; and Goyal, V

    Dorken Gallastegi, U.; Shangguan, W.; Choudhary, V.; Agarwal, A.; Rueda-Chac \'o n, H.; Stevens, M. J.; and Goyal, V. K. 2026. Ozone Cues Mitigate Reflected Downwelling Radiance in LWIR Absorption-Based Ranging. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 12: 587--600

    2026

  63. [75]

    Erdozain, J.; Ichimaru, K.; Maeda, T.; Kawasaki, H.; Raskar, R.; and Kadambi, A. 2020. 3D Imaging for Thermal Cameras Using Structured Light. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2795--2799

    2020

  64. [76]

    Guo, Z.; Li, W.; and Loy, C. C. 2024. Generalizable Implicit Motion Modeling for Video Frame Interpolation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 37, 63747--63770

    2024

  65. [77]

    Hai, Y.; Wang, G.; Su, T.; Jiang, W.; and Hu, Y. 2025. Hierarchical Flow Diffusion for Efficient Frame Interpolation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 22943--22952

    2025

  66. [78]

    Han, D.; Zheng, C.; Ling, Z.; and Jia, S. 2025. Hyperspectral Phasor Thermography. Cell Reports Physical Science, 6(3): 102501

    2025

  67. [79]

    Hu, L.; Hu, L.; and Chen, M. 2024. Edge-Enhanced Infrared Image Super-Resolution Reconstruction Model Under Transformer. Scientific Reports, 14: 15585

    2024

  68. [80]

    International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection . 2013. ICNIRP Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Incoherent Visible and Infrared Radiation. Health Physics, 105(1): 74--96

    2013

  69. [81]

    Jiang, S.; Campbell, D.; Lu, Y.; Li, H.; and Hartley, R. 2021. Learning To Estimate Hidden Motions With Global Motion Aggregation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 9772--9781

    2021

  70. [82]

    Kong, L.; Jiang, B.; Luo, D.; Chu, W.; Huang, X.; Tai, Y.; Wang, C.; and Yang, J. 2022. IFRNet : Intermediate Feature Refine Network for Efficient Frame Interpolation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1969--1978

    2022

  71. [83]

    u hmstedt, P.; T \

    Landmann, M.; Speck, H.; Dietrich, P.; Heist, S.; K \"u hmstedt, P.; T \"u nnermann, A.; and Notni, G. 2021. High-Resolution Sequential Thermal Fringe Projection Technique for Fast and Accurate 3D Shape Measurement of Transparent Objects. Applied Optics, 60(8): 2362--2371

    2021

  72. [84]

    Li, Y.; Guo, M.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Zhou, C.; Zheng, W.; Yan, Y.; Wu, S.; et al. 2026. UniM: A Unified Any-to-Any Interleaved Multimodal Benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05075

    2026

  73. [85]

    Li, Z.; Zhu, Z.-L.; Han, L.-H.; Hou, Q.; Guo, C.-L.; and Cheng, M.-M. 2023. AMT : All-Pairs Multi-Field Transforms for Efficient Frame Interpolation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 9801--9810

    2023

  74. [86]

    Liu, C.; Sui, X.; Kuang, X.; Liu, Y.; Gu, G.; and Chen, Q. 2019. Adaptive Contrast Enhancement for Infrared Images Based on the Neighborhood Conditional Histogram. Remote Sensing, 11(11): 1381

    2019

  75. [87]

    Liu, C.; Zhang, G.; Zhao, R.; and Wang, L. 2024 a . Sparse Global Matching for Video Frame Interpolation with Large Motion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 19125--19134

    2024

  76. [88]

    Liu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Jin, X.; and Huang, P. 2024 b . The Diagnostic Accuracy of Infrared Thermography in Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Prospective Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19(1): 409

    2024

  77. [89]

    Liu, S.; Fan, C.; Chen, Z.; Huang, X.; and Zhang, L. 2026. Absorption-Feature-Guided Distance-Decoupled Estimation and Band Selection for LWIR Hyperspectral Passive Ranging. arXiv:2606.31824

    2026 arXiv

  78. [90]

    Lu, Q.; Zhang, H.; and Yin, L. 2025. Infrared and Visible Image Fusion via Dual Encoder Based on Dense Connection. Pattern Recognition, 163: 111476

    2025

  79. [91]

    Lyu, Z.; and Chen, C. 2025. TLB-VFI : Temporal-Aware Latent Brownian Bridge Diffusion for Video Frame Interpolation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 16260--16269

    2025

  80. [92]

    Ma, C.; Yang, C.-Y.; Yang, X.; and Yang, M.-H. 2017. Learning a No-Reference Quality Metric for Single-Image Super-Resolution. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 158: 1--16

    2017

  81. [93]

    Meister, S.; Hur, J.; and Roth, S. 2018. UnFlow : Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow With a Bidirectional Census Loss. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32, 7251--7259

    2018

  82. [94]

    Mittal, A.; Soundararajan, R.; and Bovik, A. C. 2013. Making a Completely Blind Image Quality Analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 20(3): 209--212

    2013

  83. [95]

    Mou, C.; Wang, X.; Xie, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qi, Z.; and Shan, Y. 2024. T2I -Adapter: Learning Adapters to Dig Out More Controllable Ability for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, 4296--4304

    2024

  84. [96]

    Ng, A.; Dhruval, P.; Shalabi, J.; Jape, S.; Wang, X.; and Jacob, Z. 2024. Thermal Voyager: A Comparative Study of RGB and Thermal Cameras for Night-Time Autonomous Navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 14116--14122

    2024

  85. [97]

    Niklaus, S.; Mai, L.; and Liu, F. 2017. Video Frame Interpolation via Adaptive Separable Convolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 261--270

    2017

  86. [98]

    Peng, X.; Li, H.; Huang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Dai, W.; Li, C.; Zou, J.; and Xiong, H. 2026. Towards Holistic Modeling for Video Frame Interpolation with Auto-Regressive Diffusion Transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patte...

    2026

  87. [99]

    Seo, W.; Oh, J.; and Kim, M. 2025. BiM-VFI : Bidirectional Motion Field-Guided Frame Interpolation for Video with Non-Uniform Motions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 7244--7253

    2025

  88. [100]

    C.; and Narasimhan, S

    Sheinin, M.; Sankaranarayanan, A. C.; and Narasimhan, S. G. 2024. Projecting Trackable Thermal Patterns for Dynamic Computer Vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 25223--25232

    2024

  89. [101]

    Speck, H.; Landmann, M.; Ramm, R.; Heist, S.; K \"u hmstedt, P.; and Notni, G. 2026. Analysis of the Measurement Accuracy of a Thermal 3D Sensor for Transparent Objects. Measurement, 258: 119068

    2026

  90. [102]

    P.; Mildenhall, B.; Fridovich-Keil, S.; Raghavan, N.; Singhal, U.; Ramamoorthi, R.; Barron, J

    Tancik, M.; Srinivasan, P. P.; Mildenhall, B.; Fridovich-Keil, S.; Raghavan, N.; Singhal, U.; Ramamoorthi, R.; Barron, J. T.; and Ng, R. 2020. Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains. In Advances in Neural Information Processing ...

    2020

  91. [103]

    Tang, L.; Li, C.; and Ma, J. 2026. Mask-DiFuser: A Masked Diffusion Model for Unified Unsupervised Image Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 48(1): 591--608

    2026

  92. [104]

    Teed, Z.; and Deng, J. 2020. RAFT : Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flow. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 402--419

    2020

  93. [105]

    Teng, Y.; Ren, H.; Hu, Y.; and Dou, C. 2024. Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from SDGSAT-1 Thermal Infrared Spectrometer Images: Algorithm and Validation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 315: 114412

    2024

  94. [106]

    Wang, J.; Qu, H.; Zhang, Z.; and Xie, M. 2024. New Insights into Multi-Focus Image Fusion: A Fusion Method Based on Multi-Dictionary Linear Sparse Representation and Region Fusion Model. Information Fusion, 105: 102230

    2024

  95. [107]

    C.; Sheikh, H

    Wang, Z.; Bovik, A. C.; Sheikh, H. R.; and Simoncelli, E. P. 2004. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4): 600--612

    2004

  96. [108]

    Xu, H.; Wang, D.; Zhao, C.; Chen, J.; Lin, J.; Cao, L.; Zhong, Y.; She, Y.; and Bao, F. 2026. Universal Computational Thermal Imaging Overcoming the Ghosting Effect. arXiv:2604.01542

    2026

  97. [109]

    Zhang, G.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Huang, H.; and Huang, C. 2024. TrafficNight: An Aerial Multimodal Benchmark for Nighttime Vehicle Surveillance. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 36--48

    2024

  98. [110]

    Zhang, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhao, H.; Lu, G.; Fu, Y.; Xu, H.; and Wu, Z. 2025. EDEN : Enhanced Diffusion for High-Quality Large-Motion Video Frame Interpolation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2105--2115

    2025

  99. [111]

    Zhao, W.; Xie, S.; Zhao, F.; He, Y.; and Lu, H. 2023 a . MetaFusion: Infrared and Visible Image Fusion via Meta-Feature Embedding from Object Detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 13955--13965

    2023

  100. [112]

    Zhao, Z.; Bai, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, S.; Lin, Z.; Timofte, R.; and Van Gool, L. 2023 b . CDDFuse: Correlation-Driven Dual-Branch Feature Decomposition for Multi-Modality Image Fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,...

    2023

  101. [113]

    Zhao, Z.; Bai, H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Meng, D.; Timofte, R.; and Van Gool, L. 2023 c . DDFM: Denoising Diffusion Model for Multi-Modality Image Fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 8082--8093

    2023

  102. [114]

    Zuiderveld, K. J. 1994. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization. In Heckbert, P. S., ed., Graphics Gems IV, 474--485. Academic Press

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.