Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Valley-controlled chiral magnetism in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Under spin-valley locking, the RKKY exchange in TMD monolayers becomes chiral, pins the handedness of the 120° Néel state, and shifts the BKT spin-ordering transition to higher temperature.

desk verdict The chiral RKKY derivation is clean and the chirality-selection effect is convincing; the BKT shift is plausible but the evidence is indirect. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02260 v1 pith:RC4WFGVO submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.mes-hall

Igor S. Krivenko , Vladimir N. Mantsevich , Dmitry S. Smirnov This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords RKKYexchangespin-valleylockingchiralmagnetismtransitionmetaldichalcogenidesDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteraction120-degreeNéelorderBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thoulessmonolayerantiferromagnet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that conduction electrons in an atomically thin transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductor, when only the lower spin-split conduction band is occupied, mediate an exchange interaction between magnetic moments that rotates the relative spin direction by a valley-dependent angle. The interaction therefore acts like a Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya coupling with a period of three lattice constants. On a triangular lattice of magnetic adatoms, this chiral term breaks the degeneracy of the two 120° Néel chiralities, so the chirality phase transition disappears and one handedness is selected even at weak coupling; the BKT spin-orientation transition survives but moves to higher temperature. Mean-field theory and Monte Carlo simulations are used to establish the reshaped phase diagram. The payoff: valley occupation becomes a practical control knob for chiral magnetism in van der Waals heterostructures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-valley-locked electron Green's function G_s^(0)(ω,r) ∝ e^{isK·r}, where K is the valley wave vector. Plugging it into the RKKY susceptibility changes the scalar 2D density susceptibility into a tensor whose x-y components acquire the rotation matrix R(φ) with φ = 2|K±|R_x. This single phase factor — inherited from the valley wave-vector difference and the locking of spin to valley — is what transforms ordinary RKKY exchange into chiral exchange.

What would settle it

Compute the RKKY tensor using Green's functions that include both spin-split conduction subbands and check whether the in-plane block still contains the rotation operator of Eq. (5). If the off-diagonal chiral component survives with the same sign when the Fermi level lies above the upper subband, the locking restriction is not essential; if it cancels, the paper's central regime is confirmed as load-bearing. Experimentally, one could gate a TMD monolayer decorated with magnetic adatoms and track the selected chirality — for example via spin-polarized scanning-tunneling images or the shift of

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is the exchange tensor of Eq. (5): in the spin-valley locking regime, the pair interaction between magnetic moments at separation R has an in-plane block V∥[cosφ, -sinφ; sinφ, cosφ] with φ = 2|K±|R_x, multiplied by the standard two-dimensional RKKY envelope [J0(kF R)Y0(kF R) + J1(kF R)Y1(kF R)]. The rotation operator is what makes the interaction chiral: it rotates the relative angle between two spins by φ rather than merely favoring parallel or antiparallel alignment. The authors then show that adding this term to direct nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange selects one chirality of the 120° Néel state, removes the Ising-like chirality transition, and raises

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the chiral exchange assumes spin-valley locking — the Fermi level lies between the two spin-split conduction subbands, so only one spin species per valley contributes; if the Fermi level crosses both subbands, the opposite phases from the two spin branches can cancel and the chiral rotation term may vanish or change sign.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a TMD monolayer with the Fermi level in the spin-valley locking window, a layer of magnetic adatoms should order into a 120° Néel state with a fixed, material-dependent handedness even when RKKY coupling is weak.
  • The separate chirality-related (Ising-like) phase transition is destroyed: the average chirality remains nonzero at all temperatures once the chiral term is present.
  • The BKT spin-orientation transition is not destroyed; its temperature increases monotonically with RKKY strength, and the associated specific-heat peak broadens and shifts upward.
  • Varying the Fermi level by doping or gating changes the strength and range of the chiral term, allowing continuous tuning of the system between non-universal and universal critical behavior of the 2D XY transition.
  • The chiral magnetic order triples the magnetic unit cell, folding the Brillouin zone and coupling opposite valleys, which the paper connects to exciton fine-structure splitting and an antiferromagnetic anomalous Hall effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not stated in the paper: reversing the sign of the conduction-band spin splitting (for example, choosing a different TMD compound) should flip the preferred chirality, suggesting a materials-selection route to deterministic chirality switching.
  • Not stated in the paper: because the chiral rotation period is exactly three lattice constants, the ordered state should be directly visible as a periodic spin helix in spin-polarized scanning-probe measurements.
  • A natural extension not pursued here: for sparse or partially disordered magnetic moments, the long-range oscillatory chiral tail may create frustration or helical textures beyond the commensurate 120° Néel state, so the phase diagram for partial coverage could differ qualitatively.
  • An implied dynamic consequence: if valley population imbalance between K+ and K- could be created transiently, the phase φ entering the exchange might provide an ultrafast route to switching chirality; the paper does not discuss time-dependent control.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives the RKKY interaction between magnetic adatoms on a TMD monolayer in the spin-valley-locking regime. Equation (5) gives an exchange tensor with an in-plane rotation phase φ = 2|K±|R_x, i.e., a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-like chiral coupling with lattice period 3a0. Adding this term to a nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic XY model on a triangular lattice, the authors use mean-field theory and Monte Carlo simulations to argue that (i) even weak RKKY lifts the chirality degeneracy and removes the Ising-like chirality transition, and (ii) the BKT spin-orientation transition shifts to higher temperature. Appendices A–C contain the derivation of the RKKY tensor, the mean-field treatment of chirality, and Monte Carlo details, respectively. The simulation code is stated to be publicly available.

Significance. The RKKY derivation in Appendix A is clean, self-contained, and does not rely on fitting to the target results; it extends standard 2D RKKY theory by incorporating spin-valley locking. If the chirality-selection result holds, the paper proposes a concrete valley-controlled mechanism for chiral magnetism, with testable consequences for TMD-based heterostructures. The public availability of the Monte Carlo code is a strength. However, the second headline claim—the upward shift of the BKT transition—is currently inferred only from specific-heat and magnetization-variance peaks, which are indirect diagnostics. Given that this shift is advertised in the abstract and conclusion as one of two main consequences, the result is not yet established to the standard of a journal publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix C; Figs. 4 and 5] The claim that the BKT spin-orientation transition shifts to higher temperatures is load-bearing but unsupported by the presented observables. In 2D XY systems, the specific-heat peak does not diverge at T_BKT, lies generally above T_BKT, and its finite-size saturation is not a signature specific to the BKT transition. The variance of the magnetization magnitude is likewise not a standard BKT probe. To support the claim, the paper should compute the helicity modulus (spin stiffness) Υ(T) and test the universal jump Υ(T_BKT) = 2T_BKT/π, or equivalently use the finite-size crossing of the renormalized stiffness and the BKT correlation-length exponent η(T_BKT)=1/4. Without such a direct probe, the statement in the abstract and Conclusion that the RKKY interaction 'shifts the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition to higher temperatures' is not established.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Eqs. (9)–(10)] The destruction of the chirality-related phase transition is argued primarily from the monotonic ⟨χ⟩(T) curves in Fig. 3 and from the mean-field equation (10), which contains an explicit χ → −χ symmetry-breaking term by construction. A finite cluster will always produce a positive ⟨χ⟩ in the presence of such a field, so the absence of a visible transition in Fig. 3(b) is expected and does not by itself demonstrate the absence of a thermodynamic phase transition. A chirality Binder cumulant or a finite-size scaling analysis of the chirality susceptibility would strengthen this central claim. The mean-field result is consistent with the expected smearing of an Ising transition by a symmetry-breaking field, but the paper should make this diagnostic explicit.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Footnote 1] The footnote states that the mathematical period is 3a0/4 while the physical lattice period is 3a0. This is potentially confusing, especially since the abstract emphasizes 'tripled lattice constant.' Please state the convention clearly in the main text.
  2. [Fig. 3(b) caption] The caption reports 'L^2 = 272 atoms,' but 272 is not a perfect square. Clarify the cluster geometry (e.g., parallelogram dimensions) used for the Monte Carlo runs.
  3. [Discussion, Refs. [58–61]] The statement that earlier RKKY works on TMDs 'either neglected spin-valley locking or relied upon simplified and not realistic choices of atomic orbitals' appears too categorical, since Refs. [58] and [60] include spin-valley-coupled RKKY calculations. Please specify more precisely what is new in Eq. (5) relative to those works.
  4. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] The unbiased variance estimator contains a factor N_MC/(N_MC−1) applied to ⟨E²⟩−⟨E⟩². Please define the averaging brackets and state whether the correction applies to block averages or to the raw MC samples, as the two lead to different finite-size bias corrections.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chiral RKKY tensor follows from the spin-valley locked Green's function by a direct second-order perturbation calculation, with no parameter fitted to the target conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (5), is obtained in Appendix A from the assumed spin-valley locking Green's function G_s ∝ e^{isK·r} (Eq. A1) through standard second-order perturbation theory. The rotation matrix with φ = 2|K±|R_x emerges algebraically from the Pauli matrices and the valley phase factors; it is not inserted as a fitted parameter or defined in terms of the target chirality. The Bessel-function envelope in Eq. (5) is taken from external two-dimensional RKKY references [77–79], not from the paper's own results. The later chirality-selection and phase-transition statements (Eqs. (8)–(10), Figs. 3–5) are evaluations of this derived model, not fits that rename inputs as predictions. The self-citations present in the paper are not load-bearing: Ref. [63] is an outlook statement about exciton effects in a companion work, and Ref. [80] is cited only for the diagonal form of the local exchange tensor A, a symmetry input that does not by itself determine the chiral structure of V(R). The BKT-shift conclusion is inferred from specific-heat and magnetization-variance peaks rather than from the helicity modulus, which is a correctness/evidence concern, not a circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and no circular reduction was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities. It derives a new interaction form from stated microscopic assumptions. The free parameters are model inputs (exchange amplitudes, kF, ratios), not fitted to the target results. The key axioms are the spin-valley locking regime, parabolic single-band dispersion, and the classical XY treatment; the mean-field coarse-graining is an auxiliary approximation.

free parameters (3)
  • Exchange coupling amplitudes A_∥, A_⊥
    Phenomenological inputs defining the RKKY strength in Eq. (5); not derived. The phase diagram is computed in units of J, so absolute values are not essential, but the ratio V_∥/J is a control parameter.
  • Fermi wavevector scale k_F a_0 = 0.1 (MC)
    Selected small to satisfy k_F a_0 ≪ 1, used for the long-range integration in the mean field and for the MC truncation criterion. Results are only shown for this one value.
  • RKKY-to-direct-exchange ratio Ṽ/J = 0.0, 0.1, 0.3 (MC)
    Chosen by hand to demonstrate weak-to-moderate chiral coupling; no experimental estimate is provided. The 'destroyed transition even for small RKKY' claim is supported by the mean-field form.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Second-order perturbation theory in the exchange coupling is valid for the RKKY interaction (Eq. 2).
    Standard RKKY; assumes weak coupling and neglects higher-order corrections.
  • standard math The static spin susceptibility of a 2D parabolic-band electron gas has the form χ0(r) = (m k_F^2/2πℏ^2)[J0Y0+J1Y1] (Appendix A, Eq. A5).
    Taken from Refs. [77-79]; relies on parabolic dispersion and noninteracting electrons.
  • domain assumption Spin-valley locking regime: Fermi level lies between the spin-split conduction subbands, so only the lower subband is occupied and G_s ∝ e^{i s K·r} (Eq. A1).
    The entire chiral phase φ in Eq. (5) originates from this factor; if both subbands are occupied the chiral term is altered.
  • domain assumption The exchange tensor A is diagonal with in-plane components A_∥ and out-of-plane A_⊥ (Eq. A6), based on orbital symmetry at metal atoms.
    Anisotropic or off-diagonal exchange would modify the rotation structure, though chirality likely survives.
  • domain assumption Classical XY description of spins: easy-plane anisotropy and S treated classically (Eq. 7).
    Valid for large spins or high temperature; the paper argues triangular antiferromagnets are almost classical even for S=1/2.
  • domain assumption In the mean-field derivation, the chirality pattern is coarse-grained into hexagons with χ=±1, and the domain-wall energy is taken from Ref. [50] (Appendix B, Eq. B1).
    This is an approximation; the MC simulation does not rely on it, so the main conclusions are supported by MC.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Valley-controlled chiral magnetism in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RC4WFGVO

@misc{pith2026260802260,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Valley-controlled chiral magnetism in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RC4WFGVO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02260}
}
read the original abstract

We put forward the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers as a tool to create and control a chiral magnetic texture. We show that in the spin-valley locking regime, the RKKY interaction acts as a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya coupling with an effective spin rotation period exactly equal to the tripled lattice constant. Using mean field theory and classical Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that this interaction qualitatively reshapes the phase diagram of atomically thin antiferromagnets. It destroys the chirality-related phase transition by selecting a single chirality value even when the RKKY interaction is small. At the same time, it shifts the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition associated with spins orientation to higher temperatures. We argue that the valley degree of freedom of electrons mediating the RKKY interaction provides a powerful control knob for exploring non-universal phase transitions and quantum spin liquid states in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02260 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) RKKY exchange interaction between two mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Chiral 120 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temperature dependence of the average chirality for the different strengths of the RKKY interaction specified in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Heat capacity per atom calculated within the Monte [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Heat capacity per atom calculated within the Monte Carlo simulations for different cluster sizes specified in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [63]

    I. S. Krivenko, V. N. Mantsevich, and D. S. Smirnov, Proximity effects of chiral magnetization on transi- tion metal dichalcogenides monolayers, joint submission (2026)

    2026

  2. [1]

    T. Song, X. Cai, M. W.-Y. Tu, X. Zhang, B. Huang, N. P. Wilson, K. L. Seyler, L. Zhu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin- filter van der Waals heterostructures, Science360, 1214 (2018)

    2018

  3. [2]

    Z. Wang, I. Guti´ errez-Lezama, N. Ubrig, M. Kroner, M. Gibertini, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Imamo˘ glu, E. Giannini, and A. F. Morpurgo, Very large tunnel- ing magnetoresistance in layered magnetic semiconductor CrI3, Nat. Commun.9, 2516 (2018)

    2018

  4. [3]

    Z. Wang, T. Zhang, M. Ding, B. Dong, Y. Li, M. Chen, X. Li, J. Huang, H. Wang, X. Zhao, Y. Li, D. Li, C. Jia, L. Sun, H. Guo, Y. Ye, D. Sun, Y. Chen, T. Yang, J. Zhang, S. Ono, Z. Han, and Z. Zhang, Electric-field control of magnetism in a few-layered van der Waals ferromagnetic semiconductor, Nat. Nanotechnol.13, 554 (2018)

    2018

  5. [4]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, D. R. Klein, D. MacNeill, E. Navarro-Moratalla, K. L. Seyler, N. Wilson, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, D. Xiao, W. Yao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Electrical control of 2D magnetism in bilayer CrI3, Nat. Nanotechnol.13, 544 (2018)

    2018

  6. [5]

    Gong and X

    C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crys- tals and emergent heterostructure devices, Science363, eaav4450 (2019)

    2019

  7. [6]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Discovery of intrinsic fer- romagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature546, 265 (2017)

    2017

  8. [7]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable room-temperature ferro- magnetism in two-dimensional Fe 3GeTe2, Nature563, 94 (2018). 6

    2018

Show all 79 references
  1. [8]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature54...

    2017

  2. [9]

    Z. Wang, M. Gibertini, D. Dumcenco, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Giannini, and A. F. Morpurgo, Deter- mining the phase diagram of atomically thin layered an- tiferromagnet CrCl3, Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 1116 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    Z. Fei, B. Huang, P. Malinowski, W. Wang, T. Song, J. Sanchez, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X. Zhu, A. F. May, W. Wu, D. H. Cobden, J.-H. Chu, and X. Xu, Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe 3GeTe2, Nat. Mater.17, 778 (2018)

    2018

  4. [11]

    R. Chua, J. Zhou, X. Yu, W. Yu, J. Gou, R. Zhu, L. Zhang, M. Liu, M. B. H. Breese, W. Chen, K. P. Loh, Y. P. Feng, M. Yang, Y. L. Huang, and A. T. S. Wee, Room Temperature Ferromagnetism of Mono- layer Chromium Telluride with Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy, Adv. Mater.33, 2...

    2021

  5. [12]

    J. Son, S. Son, P. Park, M. Kim, Z. Tao, J. Oh, T. Lee, S. Lee, J. Kim, K. Zhang, K. Cho, T. Kamiyama, J. H. Lee, K. F. Mak, J. Shan, M. Kim, J.-G. Park, and J. Lee, Air-Stable and Layer-Dependent Ferromagnetism in Atomically Thin van der Waals CrPS4, ACS Nano15, 16904 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    K. Lee, A. H. Dismukes, E. J. Telford, R. A. Wiscons, J. Wang, X. Xu, C. Nuckolls, C. R. Dean, X. Roy, and X. Zhu, Magnetic Order and Symmetry in the 2D Semi- conductor CrSBr, Nano Lett.21, 3511 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    E. J. Telford, A. H. Dismukes, R. L. Dudley, R. A. Wis- cons, K. Lee, D. G. Chica, M. E. Ziebel, M.-G. Han, J. Yu, S. Shabani, A. Scheie, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Xiao, Y. Zhu, A. N. Pasupathy, C. Nuckolls, X. Zhu, C. R. Dean, and X. Roy, Coupling between magnetic or- der...

    2022

  8. [15]

    G. Long, H. Henck, M. Gibertini, D. Dumcenco, Z. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Giannini, and A. F. Morpurgo, Persistence of Magnetism in Atomically Thin MnPS3 Crystals, Nano Lett.20, 2452 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    Z. Ni, A. V. Haglund, H. Wang, B. Xu, C. Bern- hard, D. G. Mandrus, X. Qian, E. J. Mele, C. L. Kane, and L. Wu, Imaging the N´ eel vector switching in the monolayer antiferromagnet MnPSe 3 with strain- controlled Ising order, Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 782 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    Aapro, M

    M. Aapro, M. N. Huda, J. Karthikeyan, S. Kezilebieke, S. C. Ganguli, H. G. Herrero, X. Huang, P. Liljeroth, and H.-P. Komsa, Synthesis and Properties of Monolayer MnSe with Unusual Atomic Structure and Antiferromag- netic Ordering, ACS Nano15, 13794 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    J. Su, M. Wang, G. Liu, H. Li, J. Han, and T. Zhai, Air-Stable 2D Intrinsic Ferromagnetic Ta3FeS6 with Four Months Durability, Adv. Sci.7, 2001722 (2020)

    2020

  12. [19]

    Z. Lin, B. Huang, K. Hwangbo, Q. Jiang, Q. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Fei, H. Lv, A. Millis, M. McGuire, D. Xiao, J.- H. Chu, and X. Xu, Magnetism and Its Structural Cou- pling Effects in 2D Ising Ferromagnetic Insulator VI 3, Nano Lett.21, 9180 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    R. Chua, J. Yang, X. He, X. Yu, W. Yu, F. Bussolotti, P. K. J. Wong, K. P. Loh, M. B. H. Breese, K. E. J. Goh, Y. L. Huang, and A. T. S. Wee, Can Reconstructed Se- Deficient Line Defects in Monolayer VSe 2 Induce Mag- netism?, Adv. Mater.32, 2000693 (2020)

    2020

  14. [21]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J.-G. Park, Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials, Nature563, 47 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Gibertini, M

    M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A. F. Morpurgo, and K. S. Novoselov, Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 408 (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    J. F. Sierra, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, S. Roche, and S. O. Valenzuela, Van der Waals heterostructures for spintronics and opto-spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 856 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. M. Stiehl, M. H. D. Guimaraes, R. A. Buhrman, J. Park, and D. C. Ralph, Control of spin–orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe 2/ferromagnet bilayers, Nat. Phys.13, 300 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, B. Huang, X. Linpeng, N. P. Wilson, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, W. Yao, D. Xiao, M. A. McGuire, K.-M. C. Fu, and X. Xu, Valley Ma- nipulation by Optically Tuning the Magnetic Proximity Effect in WSe 2/CrI3 Heterostructures, Nano Lett.18, 3823 (2018)

    2018

  19. [26]

    S. Shi, S. Liang, Z. Zhu, K. Cai, S. D. Pollard, Y. Wang, J. Wang, Q. Wang, P. He, J. Yu, G. Eda, G. Liang, and H. Yang, All-electric magnetization switching and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in WTe2/ferromagnet heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 945 (2019)

    2019

  20. [27]

    Ciorciaro, M

    L. Ciorciaro, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Imamoglu, Observation of Magnetic Proximity Effect Using Resonant Optical Spectroscopy of an Electrically Tunable MoSe2/CrBr3 Heterostructure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 197401 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    Y. Wu, S. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. L. Zhu, J. Hu, G. Yin, K. Wong, C. Fang, C. Wan, X. Han, Q. Shao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Zang, Z. Mao, X. Zhang, and K. L. Wang, N´ eel-type skyrmion in WTe2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure, Nat. Commun.11, 3860 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    Liang, S

    S. Liang, S. Shi, C.-H. Hsu, K. Cai, Y. Wang, P. He, Y. Wu, V. M. Pereira, and H. Yang, Spin-Orbit Torque Magnetization Switching in MoTe 2/Permalloy Heterostructures, Adv. Mater.32, 2002799 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    T. Cao, G. Wang, W. Han, H. Ye, C. Zhu, J. Shi, Q. Niu, P. Tan, E. Wang, B. Liu, and J. Feng, Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide, Nat. Commun.3, 887 (2012)

    2012

  24. [31]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS2 and Other Group-VI Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  25. [32]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Ex- citons in Atomically Thin Transition Metal Dichalco- genides, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  26. [33]

    M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect Exchange Cou- pling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Elec- trons, Phys. Rev.96, 99 (1954)

    1954

  27. [34]

    Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s Model, Prog

    T. Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s Model, Prog. Theor. Phys.16, 45 (1956)

    1956

  28. [35]

    Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys, Phys

    K. Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys, Phys. Rev.106, 893 (1957)

    1957

  29. [36]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. 7 Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  30. [37]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group I. Classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP32, 493 (1971)

    1971

  31. [38]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, Metasta- bility and Phase Transitions in Two-Dimensional Sys- tems, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  32. [39]

    Korm´ anyos, V

    A. Korm´ anyos, V. Z´ olyomi, N. D. Drummond, P. Rakyta, G. Burkard, and V. I. Fal’ko, Monolayer MoS2: Trigonal Warping, the Γ Valley, and Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects, Phys. Rev. B88, 045416 (2013)

    2013

  33. [40]

    M. V. Durnev and M. M. Glazov, Excitons and trions in two-dimensional semiconductors based on transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Usp.61, 825 (2018)

    2018

  34. [41]

    Robert, B

    C. Robert, B. Han, P. Kapuscinski, A. Delhomme, C. Faugeras, T. Amand, M. R. Molas, M. Bartos, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Urbaszek, M. Potemski, and X. Marie, Measurement of the spin-forbidden dark excitons in MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayers, Nat. Commun. 11, 4037 (2020)

    2020

  35. [42]

    Giuliani and G

    G. Giuliani and G. Vignale,Quantum Theory of the Elec- tron Liquid(Cambridge university press, 2008)

    2008

  36. [43]

    J. R. Cullen, E. Callen, and A. H. Luther, Indirect Ex- change in Semiconductors, Phys. Rev.170, 733 (1968)

    1968

  37. [44]

    Miyashita and H

    S. Miyashita and H. Shiba, Nature of the Phase Tran- sition of the Two-Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Plane Rotator Model on the Triangular Lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.53, 1145 (1984)

    1984

  38. [45]

    D. H. Lee, J. D. Joannopoulos, J. W. Negele, and D. P. Landau, Discrete-Symmetry Breaking and Novel Critical Phenomena in an Antiferromagnetic Planar (XY) Model in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 433 (1984). [46]40 Years of Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless Theory (WORLD SCI...

    1984

  39. [47]

    J. M. Kosterlitz, Kosterlitz–Thouless physics: A review of key issues, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 026001 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Obuchi and H

    T. Obuchi and H. Kawamura, Spin and Chiral Orderings of the Antiferromagnetic XY Model on the Triangular Lattice and Their Critical Properties, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 054003 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    S. E. Korshunov, Kink Pairs Unbinding on Domain Walls and the Sequence of Phase Transitions in Fully Frus- trated XY Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 167007 (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    D. H. Lee, J. D. Joannopoulos, J. W. Negele, and D. P. Landau, Symmetry Analysis and Monte Carlo Study of a Frustrated Antiferromagnetic Planar (XY) Model in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. B33, 450 (1986)

    1986

  43. [51]

    Houtappel, Order-disorder in hexagonal lattices, Physica16, 425 (1950)

    R. Houtappel, Order-disorder in hexagonal lattices, Physica16, 425 (1950)

    1950

  44. [52]

    G. H. Wannier, Antiferromagnetism. The Triangular Ising Net, Phys. Rev.79, 357 (1950)

    1950

  45. [53]

    M. E. Fisher, The theory of equilibrium critical phenom- ena, Rep. Prog. Phys.30, 615 (1967)

    1967

  46. [54]

    Krivenko, MX2RKKY.jl: Monte-Carlo simulation of RKKY-induced chirality of two-dimensional antiferro- magnet (2026)

    I. Krivenko, MX2RKKY.jl: Monte-Carlo simulation of RKKY-induced chirality of two-dimensional antiferro- magnet (2026)

    2026

  47. [55]

    Zhang, B

    F. Zhang, B. Zheng, A. Sebastian, D. H. Olson, M. Liu, K. Fujisawa, Y. T. H. Pham, V. O. Jimenez, V. Kalappat- til, L. Miao, T. Zhang, R. Pendurthi, Y. Lei, A. L. El´ias, Y. Wang, N. Alem, P. E. Hopkins, S. Das, V. H. Crespi, M.-H. Phan, and M. Terrones, Monolayer Vanadium- Do...

    2020

  48. [56]

    Y. T. H. Pham, M. Liu, V. O. Jimenez, Z. Yu, V. Kalap- pattil, F. Zhang, K. Wang, T. Williams, M. Terrones, and M.-H. Phan, Tunable Ferromagnetism and Thermally Induced Spin Flip in Vanadium-Doped Tungsten Dise- lenide Monolayers at Room Temperature, Adv. Mater. 32, 2003607 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    X. Wang, C. Xiao, H. Park, J. Zhu, C. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, D. Xiao, D. R. Gamelin, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Light-induced ferromag- netism in moir´ e superlattices, Nature604, 468 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Parhizgar, H

    F. Parhizgar, H. Rostami, and R. Asgari, Indirect Ex- change Interaction between Magnetic Adatoms in Mono- layer MoS2, Phys. Rev. B87, 125401 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Hatami, T

    H. Hatami, T. Kernreiter, and U. Z¨ ulicke, Spin Suscep- tibility of Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalco- genides, Phys. Rev. B90, 045412 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    Mastrogiuseppe, N

    D. Mastrogiuseppe, N. Sandler, and S. E. Ulloa, RKKY Interaction and Intervalley Processes inp-Doped Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B90, 161403 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    M. R. Losada, A. T. Costa, B. Biel, and J. Fern´ andez- Rossier, Nonperturbative Indirect Exchange in Spin- Valley-Coupled Two-Dimensional Crystals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144408 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Zhong, K

    D. Zhong, K. L. Seyler, X. Linpeng, N. P. Wilson, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, K.-M. C. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Layer-resolved mag- netic proximity effect in van der Waals heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol.15, 187 (2020)

    2020

  55. [64]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2016)

    2016

  56. [65]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum Spin Liq- uid States, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025003 (2017)

    2017

  57. [66]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

    2020

  58. [67]

    P. W. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater. Res. Bull.8, 153 (1973)

    1973

  59. [68]

    Bernu, C

    B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Signature of N´ eel Order in Exact Spectra of Quantum Antiferromagnets on Finite Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2590 (1992)

    1992

  60. [69]

    Capriotti, A

    L. Capriotti, A. E. Trumper, and S. Sorella, Long-Range N´ eel Order in the Triangular Heisenberg Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3899 (1999)

    1999

  61. [70]

    S. R. White and A. L. Chernyshev, N´ eel Order in Square and Triangular Lattice Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 127004 (2007)

    2007

  62. [71]

    Kaneko, S

    R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and M. Imada, Gapless Spin- Liquid Phase in an Extended Spin-1/2 Triangular Heisen- berg Model, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.83, 093707 (2014)

    2014

  63. [72]

    Hu, S.-S

    W.-J. Hu, S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Compet- ing Spin-Liquid States in the Spin-1 2 Heisenberg Model on the Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 140403 (2015)

    2015

  64. [73]

    Zhu and S

    Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin Liquid Phase of theS= 1 2 J1–J2 Heisenberg Model on the Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 041105 (2015)

    2015

  65. [74]

    Hu, S.-S

    W.-J. Hu, S.-S. Gong, and D. N. Sheng, Variational Monte Carlo Study of Chiral Spin Liquid in a Quantum Antiferromagnet on the Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075131 (2016). 8

    2016

  66. [75]

    Wietek and A

    A. Wietek and A. M. L¨ auchli, Chiral Spin Liquid and Quantum Criticality in ExtendedS= 1 2 Heisenberg Models on the Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. B95, 035141 (2017)

    2017

  67. [76]

    Drescher, L

    M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Spectral Functions of an Extended Antifer- romagneticS= 1/2 Heisenberg Model on the Triangular Lattice, arXiv:2508.17292 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Fischer and M

    B. Fischer and M. W. Klein, Magnetic and Nonmagnetic Impurities in Two-Dimensional Metals, Phys. Rev. B11, 2025 (1975)

    2025

  69. [78]

    M. T. B´ eal-Monod, Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida Indirect Interaction in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 36, 8835 (1987)

    1987

  70. [79]

    V. I. Litvinov and V. K. Dugaev, RKKY Interaction in One- and Two-Dimensional Electron Gases, Phys. Rev. B58, 3584 (1998)

    1998

  71. [80]

    I. D. Avdeev and D. S. Smirnov, Hyperfine interac- tion in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides, Nanoscale Adv.1, 2624 (2019). End Matter Appendix A: Derivation of RKKY interaction.—The bare Green’s function of electrons in the lower subband of the TMD ML conductio...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.