Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Novel Observable Signals from First-Order Gravitational Phase Transitions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read When scalarization happens as a first-order phase transition, an accreting neutron star jumps discontinuously into a strongly scalarized state and emits a gravitational-wave breathing mode that current detectors could see at 10…

desk verdict A credible numerical study of a genuinely new effect—first-order scalarization producing an inverse-chirp breathing mode—but the observability claim leans on an untested parameter choice and an under-examined scalar-mass bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02736 v1 pith:KSJN2R4E submitted 2026-08-03 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords spontaneousscalarizationfirst-orderphasetransitionscalar-tensorgravityneutronstarsgravitationalwavesbreathingmodesmassivescalarfieldinversechirp
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Spontaneous scalarization is a phase transition in which a neutron star suddenly grows a macroscopic scalar-field cloud and departs from general relativity. This paper argues that in many astrophysically relevant scalar-tensor theories the transition is first-order rather than the smooth, second-order process usually assumed. It simulates an accreting neutron star pushed past the point of metastability: the star abruptly jumps to a strongly scalarized configuration, releases latent heat, and rings with coupled fluid and scalar oscillations. The resulting burst of massive-scalar radiation disperses into a long-lived inverse chirp, and its gravitational-wave breathing-mode strain is calculated to rise above the noise of current ground-based detectors for a source at 10 kiloparsecs. The same discontinuity, the paper argues, should create novel observable signatures in many other scalarization scenarios, turning first-order scalarization into a new test of deviations from general relativity.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a Landau-type energy expansion of the ADM mass, Eq. (4), in terms of a scalarization-strength measure $\Phi$: $M_{\rm ADM}=M_0+a\Phi^2+\tfrac12 b\Phi^4+\tfrac13 c\Phi^6+\cdots$. When the quartic coefficient $b$ is positive, scalarized minima emerge continuously (second-order transition); when $b<0$, weakly and strongly scalarized minima coexist behind an energy barrier and the globally preferred solution changes discontinuously (first-order). The sign of $b$ is controlled by the quartic matter–scalar coupling $\gamma$ in $A(\phi)$: positive $\gamma$ lowers $b$ and favors first-order scalarization, and the paper adopts $\gamma=12\beta^2$ because that choice cancels the quartic term in the Taylor expansion of $A^4$, making it a natural representative point. The second ingredient is the massive scalar field, whose frequency-dependent group velocity converts the short source burst into a long-lived inverse chirp as it propagates to kiloparsec distances.

What would settle it

Search existing LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA data for the predicted breathing-mode inverse chirp: a signal whose instantaneous frequency evolves as $f(t)\approx f_*/\sqrt{2(t-D)/D}$ with $f_*=2.42\,\mathrm{Hz}$ and $D\approx10$ kpc, appearing within weeks after an accretion event on a nearby neutron star. A null result over a sizable sample, at the strain levels the paper computes for $\gamma=12\beta^2$, would rule out first-order scalarization for those parameters; a detection would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the general fact that replacing second-order scalarization with its first-order version radically changes the observable outcome of scalarization events, because the transition is discontinuous. In the model studied—a massive scalar field with mass $m_\phi = 10^{-14}\,\mathrm{eV}$ coupled to matter through $A(\phi)=\exp(\alpha_0\phi + \tfrac12\beta\phi^2 - \tfrac1{24}\gamma\phi^4)$ with $\beta=-5$ and $\gamma=12\beta^2$—the equilibrium sequence of neutron stars has two locally stable branches separated by an energy barrier. When accretion raises the baryon mass past the local maximum, the star makes an abrupt, nonperturbative jump from a weakly scalarized to a strongly scalarized branch. This releases part of the binding-energy difference, excites stellar oscillations, and emits a monopolar scalar pulse. Because the scalar is massive, propagation disperses the pulse into an inverse chirp whose observed frequency slowly decreases on year timescales; the associated breathing-mode strain, scaled to 10 kpc and a 60-day observation, exceeds the noise amplitudes of aLIGO, aVirgo, and KAGRA. The same setup with $\gamma=0$, where scalarization is second-order, produces no signal distinguishable from numerical error.

Load-bearing premise

The observability prediction rests on the theory having a positive quartic coupling $\gamma$ of order $\beta^2$; if the true coupling were zero or small, scalarization would be second-order and the predicted signal would vanish, and if it were smaller the transition would happen below about one solar mass where astrophysical neutron stars are rarer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Accretion-induced first-order scalarization in massive scalar-tensor gravity produces gravitational-wave breathing modes whose amplitude spectral density exceeds the current detector noise curves at 10 kpc, giving a new channel to test deviations from general relativity.
  • A null search for such inverse-chirp signals in existing detector data would constrain the quartic coupling $\gamma$ and thereby the order of scalarization, since $\gamma=0$ predicts silence.
  • The same abrupt-transition logic extends to descalarization and to black-hole scalarization, including spin-induced transitions, where discontinuous jumps would create distinct observable bursts rather than smooth evolution.
  • In binary systems dynamical and induced scalarization would become abrupt at small separations, changing the expected waveform morphology relative to all second-order studies to date.
  • The signal frequency scales linearly with the scalar mass, so the effect is observable with current detectors only for $m_\phi \lesssim 10^{-11}\,\mathrm{eV}$; heavier scalar fields move the signal out of band.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because $\gamma=12\beta^2$ is a representative choice rather than a derived relation, the paper's observability prediction effectively turns the detection problem into a direct measurement of the quartic matter–scalar coupling: a loud inverse chirp from a known accreting neutron star would be evidence for a first-order transition, and its absence would push $\gamma$ toward zero.
  • The inverse-chirp waveform's frequency evolution is fixed by the scalar mass and source distance alone (Eq. 6), so even without precise knowledge of the accretion trigger, a targeted narrow-band search in archival LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA data could test the prediction.
  • The same latent-heat release that powers the scalar burst may also heat the stellar material and produce electromagnetic or neutrino counterparts, which the paper does not compute but which would give independent confirmation if first-order scalarization actually occurs.
  • Eccentric binaries could cross the energy barrier repeatedly, producing a train of descalarization/scalarization bursts—a signature with no analogue in second-order scalarization and a potentially clean probe of the transition's hysteresis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that spontaneous scalarization in scalar-tensor theories, traditionally modeled as a second-order phase transition, is often first-order once the quartic scalar-matter coupling γ is included. It claims that first-order scalarization leads to abrupt transitions that emit strong monopolar scalar radiation, which at large distances appears as a long-lived inverse-chirp gravitational-wave breathing mode. The authors demonstrate this with spherically symmetric simulations of a neutron star driven across the phase transition by accretion, using a scalar-tensor extension of the GR1D code, with parameters α0=1e-2, β=-5, mφ=1e-14 eV, and γ=12β^2 (or 18β^2). They show that the resulting strain spectral density exceeds the sensitivity of aLIGO, aVirgo, and KAGRA at 10 kpc for a 60-day coherent observation, whereas the γ=0 (second-order) case yields no observable signal. They also discuss generalizations to black holes and binaries.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes an important qualitative point: first-order scalarization produces qualitatively different, much louder gravitational-wave signatures than the continuously studied second-order case. The numerical pipeline is credible, with a demonstrated third-order convergence of the scalar constraint and a 1000-fold variation of the accretion amplitude leaving the signal unchanged; wave extraction and propagation follow published methods. The predicted inverse-chirp breathing mode is a falsifiable, detector-relevant prediction, and the general claim is likely to stimulate further work on first-order scalarization in binaries and black-hole systems. However, the specific observability claim rests on a scalar mass mφ=1e-14 eV that is in tension with existing bounds, and the paper does not quantitatively address this tension, leaving the central claim only conditionally supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and Discussion, around Eq. (6)] The observability of the inverse-chirp signal is controlled by mφ, and the paper itself states that mφ ≳ 1e-11 eV would move the signal out of the detector band. The only response to the existing tentative bound mφ ≳ 1e-11 eV (Ref. [49]) is one sentence ("these limits are qualitative and do not yet consider the first-order scalarization that we study"). This is not adequate support for a central observability claim. The first-order scenario could plausibly strengthen, not weaken, merger constraints: a first-order dynamical scalarization during inspiral would produce a burst of scalar radiation whose absence in GW170817 would directly constrain the theory. The authors should either provide a quantitative estimate of the scalar radiation in a binary inspiral with first-order scalarization and compare with current bounds, or identify a region of parameter space (e.g., with mφ smaller than the bound) that is consistent with observations and still yields the predicted signal. Without this, the conclusion that the signal is observable is not established.
  2. [Results, parameter-dependence paragraph and Figure 3] The statement that "a large part of the parameter space leads to the loud signals" is not supported by the presented analysis. The paper varies only γ among three values (0, 12β^2, 18β^2), and qualitatively discusses β, mφ, and α0, but does not scan the parameter space. In particular, the strain is proportional to α0 (Eq. (5)), and the paper notes that mφ changes the transition and may push it to second order; both effects can significantly shrink the observable region. A systematic scan (e.g., a contour of signal-to-noise ratio in the β–γ or α0–mφ plane) would justify the "large part" claim, or the claim should be softened to the specific, representative region studied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results] In the first paragraph of Results, "α = 10^{-2}" should read "α0 = 10^{-2}" to match the notation introduced in Eq. (3).
  2. [Reference [36]] Reference [36] contains a typo: "later discover" should be "later discovered".
  3. [End Matter, Wave Propagation] In the End Matter, "we take the fourier transform" should be capitalized as "Fourier transform".
  4. [Figure 3] Figure 3 would be clearer if the caption stated the assumed source distance (D=10 kpc) and coherent observation time (T=60 days), which currently appear only in the text.
  5. [Eq. (5)] The approximation h_B ≈ 2α0φ is presented without stating that it is valid in the far zone where φ is small; a brief clarification would avoid confusion because near the star the scalar field can be of order unity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the breathing-mode signal is a genuine simulation output, and the self-citations are background support rather than the derivation itself.

full rationale

The paper's central output, the breathing-mode strain and inverse-chirp signal, is a genuine dynamical result rather than a refitting of inputs. The scalar field is evolved from the action in Eqs. (1)-(3) under the stated accretion trigger, and the strain h_B is read off through Eq. (5) as h_B = A^2(phi) - 1 approximately 2 alpha_0 phi, evaluated from the simulated field; no equation in the paper equates the final waveform to an input parameter by construction. The first-order character of the transition is demonstrated by the paper's own equilibrium sequences in Fig. 1, and the Landau expansion in Eq. (4) is used only to classify the transition, not to construct the signal. The choice gamma = 12 beta^2 is an openly stated parameter convention chosen to cancel the quartic term in the A^4 expansion; the authors also test gamma = 18 beta^2 and explicitly note that gamma = 0 removes the signal, so the conclusion is parameter-conditional but not circular. The self-citations [13], [21], and [43] provide background classification and equilibrium-solver details, but the present simulation, propagation, and strain computation are independent outputs that do not reduce to those citations. The one-sentence dismissal of the scalar-mass bound from Ref. [49] is a potential correctness risk, but it is not a circularity in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The load-bearing ingredients are the imported first-order phase-transition classification and the hand-chosen gamma coupling; both are transparently stated. The axiom count is modest for a numerical theory paper, and the least justified item is the normalization of gamma.

free parameters (1)
  • gamma (quartic scalar-matter coupling) = 12*beta^2 = 300 for beta=-5 (also 18*beta^2 = 450 studied)
    Chosen by hand, not fitted. The paper calls gamma=12*beta^2 the natural value because it cancels the quartic term in the expansion of A^4, and shows gamma=18*beta^2 gives an even stronger signal.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Landau-type energy expansion of the ADM mass, Eq. (4), with b<0 indicating a first-order transition
    Imported from Ref. [13]; the paper's entire distinction between weak and strong scalarization branches rests on this expansion and on the accompanying stability analysis.
  • domain assumption The conformal coupling A(phi)=exp(alpha0*phi + (1/2)*beta*phi^2 - (1/24)*gamma*phi^4), with gamma allowed to be independent of beta
    Defined in Eq. (3). All results are confined to this theory class; the availability of positive gamma of order beta^2 is the load-bearing assumption for high-mass first-order scalarization.
  • domain assumption A spherically symmetric Gaussian matter shell, width 1.5 km and peak density 5e-6 of the central density, adequately models the final stage of accretion
    End Matter Accretion Model; the authors verify amplitude insensitivity by a factor of 1000 but do not test non-spherical or prolonged accretion histories.
  • domain assumption HB equation of state is representative because the phase-transition structure is not EOS sensitive
    Stated in Results with reference to Ref. [21]; only this EOS is used in the simulation.
  • standard math Outside the extraction radius the scalar obeys the flat-space massive Klein-Gordon equation, Eq. (E2), and subsequent kpc-scale propagation follows the dispersion relation v_g = sqrt(1 - (f*/f)^2)
    Standard linear wave propagation in a flat background; uncontroversial given the extracted waveform.
  • domain assumption The breathing-mode strain is h_B = A^2(phi)-1 approximately equal to 2*alpha0*phi, with the longitudinal mode suppressed by (f*/f)^2
    Eq. (5) and surrounding text; this is the mapping from scalar radiation to gravitational-wave detector strain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Novel Observable Signals from First-Order Gravitational Phase Transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KSJN2R4E

@misc{pith2026260802736,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Novel Observable Signals from First-Order Gravitational Phase Transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KSJN2R4E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02736}
}
read the original abstract

Spontaneous scalarization is a well-known phenomenon in scalar-tensor theories, featuring large deviations from general relativity. However, some of its signatures are hard to detect, because it is generally studied as a continuous phase transition. We show that scalarization occurs in a discontinuous (first-order) manner in many astrophysically relevant scenarios. This leads to loud signals that provide new tests of gravity. We demonstrate this in the case of gravitational wave breathing modes from a neutron star that scalarizes due to accretion, and discuss other possibilities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02736 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Baryon mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Effective amplitude spectral density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    H.-J. Kuan, K. Van Aelst, A. T.-L. Lam, and M. Shibata, Binary neutron star mergers in massive scalar-tensor the- ory: Quasiequilibrium states and dynamical enhance- ment of the scalarization, Phys. Rev. D108, 064057 (2023), arXiv:2309.01709 [gr-qc]

  2. [1]

    C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Rela- tivity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

  3. [2]

    Baracket al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap, Class

    L. Baracket al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

  4. [3]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4.0: Tests of gen- eral relativity. i. overview and general tests (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

  5. [4]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4.0: Tests of general rel- ativity. ii. parameterized tests (2026), arXiv:2603.19020 [gr-qc]

  6. [5]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4.0: Tests of general rela- tivity. iii. tests of the remnants (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

  7. [6]

    Fujii and K

    Y. Fujii and K. Maeda,The Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

  8. [7]

    D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Spontaneous scalarization, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015004 (2024), arXiv:2211.01766 [gr-qc]

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Nonperturbative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar theories of gravitation, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2220 (1993)

  2. [9]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Tensor multiscalar theories of gravitation, Class.Quant.Grav.9, 2093 (1992)

  3. [10]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Tensor-scalar gravity and binary-pulsar experiments, Phys. Rev. D54, 1474 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9602056

  4. [11]

    Sperhake, C

    U. Sperhake, C. J. Moore, R. Rosca, M. Agathos, D. Gerosa, and C. D. Ott, Long-lived inverse chirp sig- nals from core collapse in massive scalar-tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 201103 (2017), arXiv:1708.03651 [gr-qc]

  5. [12]

    H.-J. Kuan, A. G. Suvorov, D. D. Doneva, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Gravitational Waves from Accretion-Induced Descalarization in Massive Scalar-Tensor Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 121104 (2022), arXiv:2203.03672 [gr-qc]

  6. [13]

    K. ˙I. ¨Unl¨ ut¨ urk, S. Tuna, O. K. Yamak, and F. M. Ra- mazano˘ glu, Nature of phase transitions and metastability in scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 061401 (2025), arXiv:2502.01781 [gr-qc]

  7. [14]

    A. T.-L. Lam, K. V. Staykov, H.-J. Kuan, D. D. Doneva, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Axisymmetric stability of neutron stars as extreme rotators in massive scalar-tensor theory, Phys. Rev. D111, 104030 (2025)

  8. [15]

    H.-J. Kuan, D. D. Doneva, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Dy- namical formation of scalarized black holes and neutron stars through stellar core collapse, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 161103 (2021)

  9. [16]

    H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti, Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a gauss-bonnet coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131104 (2018)

  10. [17]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and N. Yunes, Spin-induced scalarized black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 011103 (2021)

  11. [18]

    L. Li, Z. Sun, and F.-G. Yang, Critical phenomenon inside asymptotically flat black holes with spontaneous scalarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 251402 (2026)

  12. [19]

    Harada, Neutron stars in scalar tensor theories of grav- ity and catastrophe theory, Phys

    T. Harada, Neutron stars in scalar tensor theories of grav- ity and catastrophe theory, Phys. Rev. D57, 4802 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9801049

  13. [20]

    J. V. M. Muniz, N. Ortiz, and R. F. P. Mendes, Phase transition mechanism of spontaneous scalarization, Phys. Rev. D112, 064037 (2025), arXiv:2503.11385 [gr-qc]. 6

  14. [21]

    ¨Ozinan, K

    M. ¨Ozinan, K. ˙I. ¨Unl¨ ut¨ urk, and F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Underlying mechanisms of phase transitions in scalar- tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D114, 024054 (2026), arXiv:2604.24867 [gr-qc]

  15. [22]

    Huang, B

    H. Huang, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, M.-Y. Lai, E. Radu, and D.-C. Zou, Phase transitions of boson stars in scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D112, 124086 (2025), arXiv:2509.05202 [gr-qc]

  16. [23]

    H. Guo, H. Liu, and Y. S. Myung, Scalar-hairy AdS black hole in the Einstein–Maxwell-scalar theory: first-order phase transition with a critical point, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 204 (2026), arXiv:2512.22433 [gr-qc]

  17. [24]

    Herdeiro, H

    C. Herdeiro, H. Huang, J. Kunz, M.-Y. Lai, E. Radu, and D.-C. Zou, Phase structure of scalarized black holes in einstein-scalar-gauss-bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D113, 124046 (2026)

  18. [25]

    P. J. Nee, G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, and N. L. Vu, Quasis- tationary hair for binary black hole initial data in scalar gauss-bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, 024061 (2025)

  19. [26]

    Juli´ e, Dynamical scalarization in Schwarzschild bi- nary inspirals (2023), arXiv:2312.16764 [gr-qc]

    F.-L. Juli´ e, Dynamical scalarization in Schwarzschild bi- nary inspirals (2023), arXiv:2312.16764 [gr-qc]

  20. [27]

    Barausse, C

    E. Barausse, C. Palenzuela, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, Neutron-star mergers in scalar-tensor theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D87, 081506 (2013), arXiv:1212.5053 [gr-qc]

  21. [28]

    Shibata, K

    M. Shibata, K. Taniguchi, H. Okawa, and A. Buo- nanno, Coalescence of binary neutron stars in a scalar- tensor theory of gravity, Phys. Rev. D89, 084005 (2014), arXiv:1310.0627 [gr-qc]

  22. [29]

    Palenzuela, E

    C. Palenzuela, E. Barausse, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, Dynamical scalarization of neutron stars in scalar-tensor gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D89, 044024 (2014), arXiv:1310.4481 [gr-qc]

  23. [30]

    A. Dima, E. Barausse, N. Franchini, and T. P. Sotiriou, Spin-induced black hole spontaneous scalarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 231101 (2020), arXiv:2006.03095 [gr-qc]

  24. [31]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and N. Yunes, Spin-induced scalarized black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 011103 (2021), arXiv:2009.03904 [gr-qc]

  25. [32]

    Elley, H

    M. Elley, H. O. Silva, H. Witek, and N. Yunes, Spin- induced dynamical scalarization, descalarization, and stealthness in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity during a black hole coalescence, Phys. Rev. D106, 044018 (2022), arXiv:2205.06240 [gr-qc]

  26. [33]

    F. C. L. Pardoe and H. Witek, Scalarization and descalar- ization in hyperbolic encounters of black holes (2026), arXiv:2606.30865 [gr-qc]

  27. [34]

    Capuano, L

    L. Capuano, L. A. Sal´ o, D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazadjiev, and E. Barausse, Dynamical hair growth in black hole bi- naries in einstein-scalar-gauss-bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D113, 124038 (2026)

  28. [35]

    Elley, H

    M. Elley, H. O. Silva, H. Witek, and N. Yunes, Spin- induced dynamical scalarization, descalarization, and stealthness in scalar-gauss-bonnet gravity during a black hole coalescence, Phys. Rev. D106, 044018 (2022)

  29. [36]

    One important exception is Kuanet al.[12], which con- sidered a discontinuous transition at the maximum mass limit of stellar solutions, a distinct phenomenon from the later discover first-order scalarization picture we study here

  30. [37]

    ¨Ozel and P

    F. ¨Ozel and P. Freire, Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 401 (2016), arXiv:1603.02698 [astro-ph.HE]

  31. [38]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Ex- tended Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131103 (2018), arXiv:1711.01187 [gr-qc]

  32. [39]

    H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti, Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131104 (2018), arXiv:1711.02080 [gr-qc]

  33. [40]

    Andreou, N

    N. Andreou, N. Franchini, G. Ventagli, and T. P. Sotiriou, Spontaneous scalarization in generalized scalar- tensor theory, Phys. Rev.D99, 124022 (2019), arXiv:1904.06365 [gr-qc]

  34. [41]

    Similar functions have been used in the context of non- linear scalarization as well [60]

  35. [42]

    (3) withγ= 12β 2

    We could easily construct a single parameter family of functions that has a vanishing quadratic term in the Tay- lor expansion forA 4, such asA 4 ρ(φ) = 1+1/2 tanh (4ρφ2), which would prefer first-order scalarization similarly to Eq. (3) withγ= 12β 2. This would explicitly dem...

  36. [43]

    K. V. Staykov, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, D. D. Doneva, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phase transition structure of scalarized neutron stars: the effect of rotation and linear coupling (2026), arXiv:2604.21298 [gr-qc]

  37. [44]

    Rosca-Mead, C

    R. Rosca-Mead, C. J. Moore, U. Sperhake, M. Agathos, and D. Gerosa, Structure of neutron stars in mas- sive scalar-tensor gravity, Symmetry12, 1384 (2020), arXiv:2007.14429 [gr-qc]

  38. [45]

    J. S. Read, C. Markakis, M. Shibata, K. Uryu, J. D. E. Creighton, and J. L. Friedman, Measuring the neutron star equation of state with gravitational wave observa- tions, Phys. Rev. D79, 124033 (2009), arXiv:0901.3258 [gr-qc]

  39. [46]

    Evans, R

    M. Evans, R. Sturani, S. Vitale, and E. Hall, Unofficial sensitivity curves for aligo, kagra, virgo, voyager, cos- mic explorer, and einstein telescope, LIGO Document T1500293-v13 (2023)

  40. [47]

    F. M. Ramazano˘ glu and F. Pretorius, Spontaneous Scalarization with Massive Fields, Phys. Rev.D93, 064005 (2016), arXiv:1601.07475 [gr-qc]

  41. [48]

    S. Tuna, K. I. ¨Unl¨ ut¨ urk, and F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Con- straining scalar-tensor theories using neutron star mass and radius measurements, Phys. Rev. D105, 124070 (2022), arXiv:2204.02138 [gr-qc]

  42. [50]

    Gerosa, U

    D. Gerosa, U. Sperhake, and C. D. Ott, Numerical simulations of stellar collapse in scalar-tensor theo- ries of gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 135002 (2016), arXiv:1602.06952 [gr-qc]

  43. [51]

    Berti, L

    E. Berti, L. G. Collodel, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Spin-induced black-hole scalarization in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 011104 (2021), arXiv:2009.03905 [gr-qc]

  44. [52]

    D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazadjiev, N. Stergioulas, and K. D. Kokkotas, Rapidly rotating neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D88, 084060 (2013), arXiv:1309.0605 [gr-qc]. 7

  45. [53]

    Sagert, T

    I. Sagert, T. Fischer, M. Hempel, G. Pagliara, J. Schaffner-Bielich, A. Mezzacappa, F.-K. Thielemann, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Signals of the qcd phase transition in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 081101 (2009)

  46. [54]

    Shao, Degeneracy in Studying the Supranuclear Equa- tion of State and Modified Gravity with Neutron Stars, AIP Conf

    L. Shao, Degeneracy in Studying the Supranuclear Equa- tion of State and Modified Gravity with Neutron Stars, AIP Conf. Proc.2127, 020016 (2019), arXiv:1901.07546 [gr-qc]

  47. [55]

    E. R. Most, L. J. Papenfort, V. Dexheimer, M. Hanauske, S. Schramm, H. St¨ ocker, and L. Rezzolla, Signatures of quark-hadron phase transitions in general-relativistic neutron-star mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 061101 (2019)

  48. [56]

    Cao and L.-W

    Z. Cao and L.-W. Chen, On the Possibility of a Strong First-Order Phase Transition in Neutron Stars (2026), arXiv:2606.06378 [nucl-th]

  49. [57]

    Salgado, D

    M. Salgado, D. Sudarsky, and U. Nucamendi, On spon- taneous scalarization, Phys. Rev. D58, 124003 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9806070

  50. [58]

    Taniguchi, M

    K. Taniguchi, M. Shibata, and A. Buonanno, Quasiequi- librium sequences of binary neutron stars undergoing dy- namical scalarization, Phys. Rev. D91, 024033 (2015), arXiv:1410.0738 [gr-qc]

  51. [59]

    Khalil, N

    M. Khalil, N. Sennett, J. Steinhoff, and A. Buonanno, Theory-agnostic framework for dynamical scalarization of compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D100, 124013 (2019), arXiv:1906.08161 [gr-qc]

  52. [60]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Beyond the sponta- neous scalarization: New fully nonlinear mechanism for the formation of scalarized black holes and its dynam- ical development, Phys. Rev. D105, L041502 (2022), arXiv:2107.01738 [gr-qc]

  53. [61]

    O’Connor and C

    E. O’Connor and C. D. Ott, A New Open-Source Code for Spherically-Symmetric Stellar Collapse to Neutron Stars and Black Holes, Class.Quant.Grav.27, 114103 (2010), arXiv:0912.2393 [astro-ph.HE]

  54. [62]

    Rosca-Mead, U

    R. Rosca-Mead, U. Sperhake, C. J. Moore, M. Agathos, D. Gerosa, and C. D. Ott, Core collapse in massive scalar- tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 044010 (2020)

  55. [63]

    R. F. P. Mendes and N. Ortiz, Highly compact neu- tron stars in scalar-tensor theories of gravity: Sponta- neous scalarization versus gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev.D93, 124035 (2016), arXiv:1604.04175 [gr-qc]

  56. [64]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Stability of the iterated crank-nicholson method in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D61, 087501 (2000). End Matter Numerical Detail:The stellar evolution is performed with a scalar-tensor extension of the GR1D code [61]. GR1D was originally developed for sphe...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.