Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 107 references

Neutrino flavor-wave transport: Numerical tests and theoretical challenges

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Exceptional points break flavor-wave transport under slow driving.

desk verdict First slow-driving tests of flavomon transport that honestly report two negative results — QL misses turbulent spectral transfer and exceptional points break quasistaticity — but the genericity claim rests on two periodic-box testbeds the authors themselves concede may not generalize. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02984 v1 pith:IFUWH6YV submitted 2026-08-04 hep-ph astro-ph.HE

Anson Kost , Lucas Johns , Huaiyu Duan This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HE
keywords neutrinoflavorwavesquantumkineticsexceptionalpointsquasistaticapproximationquasilinearfastinstabilitysupernovaneutrinosnon-Hermitianspectra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests whether flavor-wave transport, a quasiparticle approximation for small-scale neutrino flavor fluctuations, remains valid when neutrinos are driven slowly through marginally stable states. The authors present the first numerical calculations of this kind and find that the quasilinear approximation, which drops wave–wave coupling, has mixed but questionable reliability because nonlinear coupling produces flavor-wave turbulence that redistributes energy across wave vectors. Their main result is that the quasistatic approximation, which ignores transitions between flavor-wave energy levels caused by finite driving rates, breaks down near spectral degeneracies: exceptional points are generic when systems pass through marginal stability, and they amplify mode transitions. If this holds, flavor-wave transport as currently formulated cannot safely be used in the slow-driving regimes expected in supernova and neutron-star merger environments, unless a tractable description of nonquasistatic transitions is found.

What carries the argument

Flavor waves are collective excitations of the neutrino medium, treated as quasiparticles whose energies and decay rates come from the eigenvalues of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian $H_n$ acting on Fourier-mode wave functions $\Psi_n$. The equation of motion $i\partial_t \Phi_n = \Omega_n \Phi_n + S_n^{-1} N_n - i S_n^{-1}(\partial_t S_n)\Phi_n$ separates phase evolution, nonlinear wave–wave coupling, and finite-rate transitions. The quasistatic approximation drops the last term; the paper's numerical tests show the term cannot be dropped because exceptional points, where $H_n$ loses diagonalizability and two eigenmodes coalesce, are endemic near marginal stability and amplify transitions between levels. A parallel-transport prescription fixes the freedom in how eigenvectors are carried through time, isolating the physical off-diagonal transitions.

What would settle it

Run the same slow-injection test with progressively larger numbers of momentum bins (approaching the continuum) and check whether hybrid solutions that apply the quasistatic approximation remain accurate. If nonadiabatic transitions near marginal stability shrink or disappear as the momentum grid is refined, the exceptional-point breakdown would be an artifact of discrete-beam test beds rather than a generic obstacle. A second check: measure the transition probability through a single exceptional point in a controlled two-level non-Hermitian model and compare with the quasistatic prediction; a nonzero, order-one transition at arbitrarily slow driving would confirm the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's load-bearing conclusion is that exceptional points—locations in parameter space where two eigenvalues and their eigenstates coalesce in a non-Hermitian spectrum—are generic in flavor-wave spectra when neutrino systems are driven through marginally stable states. At such points the eigenbasis decomposition on which flavor-wave transport is built breaks down, and the quasistatic approximation fails because near-degenerate modes undergo large transitions due to finite rates of background change. The same mechanism produces small energy gaps even deep in the stable regime, so the failure is not confined to the instability threshold. The authors demonstrate the failure numerically with two- and three-beam periodic-box models under slow neutrino injection, comparing exact quantum-kinetic solutions with hybrid solutions that selectively apply the quasistatic approximation only where mode splittings exceed a threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions rest on the assumption that the periodic-box, two- and three-beam models with slow neutrino injection reproduce the flavor-wave behavior of the near-continuum momentum distributions in real supernovae; the paper explicitly leaves open the possibility that the continuum limit behaves fundamentally differently.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Flavor-wave transport must either find a tractable approximation for nonquasistatic level transitions or be reformulated to avoid exceptional points; the quasistatic approximation is essential to the current formulation.
  • Wave vectors with large mode splittings can still be evolved quasistatically, but in the tested models there is no time at which all wave vectors satisfy the criterion.
  • Nonlinear wave–wave coupling redistributes spectral energy even in simple two- and three-beam setups, so the quasilinear approximation alone is not obviously reliable for astrophysical modeling.
  • The continuum limit might evade the problem, but until demonstrated, momentum discretization inherited from Boltzmann transport cannot be assumed safe.
  • Spontaneous transverse polarization components can open new flavor instabilities that are absent when all mean polarizations are aligned with the flavor axis, although no effect was seen in these calculations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If exceptional points are as generic as the paper suggests, a non-Hermitian analogue of the Landau–Zener formula would be a natural next ingredient; the paper notes no such formula is known, and developing one for driven flavor waves could restore quasistatic transport.
  • The failure mode may be milder in realistic inhomogeneous settings if flavor waves advect through degenerate regions quickly rather than lingering; the paper leaves propagation through degeneracies untested.
  • Because the quasilinear approximation errs by omitting wave turbulence, flavor-wave kinetics with secular resonant interactions is a testable intermediate step; the paper lists this as future work, and its numerical framework could be extended to compare against exact QKE solutions.
  • A numerical scan varying the driving rate and the number of momentum beams would map where the exceptional-point breakdown becomes severe and could guide whether transport codes need to fall back to full QKE evolution in specific wave-vector bands.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first numerical tests of flavor-wave transport under slow driving, using periodic-box models with two or three discrete momentum beams and exact QKE solutions as the benchmark. It tests two approximations: quasilinearity (neglect of nonlinear wave–wave coupling) and quasistaticity (neglect of nonadiabatic transitions due to finite-rate changes of the background). The main findings are that the QL approximation has mixed and model-dependent reliability, and that spectral degeneracies—exceptional points—near marginal stability amplify nonquasistatic transitions, undermining the QS approximation. The paper also introduces a hybrid method that applies the QS approximation only to modes satisfying a spectral-gap criterion, discusses flavor-wave parallel transport, and examines flavor-space rotational symmetry breaking.

Significance. If correct, the paper identifies a potentially serious obstacle for flavor-wave transport in slowly driven astrophysical settings: exceptional points are claimed to be generic near marginal stability, and they invalidate the quasistatic population evolution on which current flavor-wave transport relies. The work is valuable as a numerical stress test of an emerging approximation framework, and it gives credit to prior sudden-instability tests by Fiorillo and Raffelt. Strengths include the use of an external exact-QKE benchmark, the modified open-source NuGas code, an explicit hybrid algorithm, and candid disclosure of limitations, including the two-beam restart and the continuum-limit caveat. These features make the numerical claims reproducible and the interpretation appropriately cautious, although the genericity of the exceptional-point breakdown remains incompletely tested.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 1] The two-beam QL test is not a clean comparison because the QL evolution is halted at µt=1000 and restarted at µt=1500 using the exact simulation data. The authors acknowledge that this choice exaggerates agreement, but the restart also erases any QL error accumulated during [1000,1500] and forces the subsequent [1500,3000] comparison to begin from an exact state. For a robust QL assessment, the QL calculation should either be run continuously over [0,3000] or the error should be reported separately for intervals [0,1000] and [1500,3000] so that the effect of the restart is quantified. This does not directly affect the QS conclusion of Section IV, but it weakens the paper's QL reliability claims.
  2. [Section IV and Section VI] The central claim that exceptional points are generic in flavor-wave spectra and that spectral degeneracies undermine quasistaticity rests on only two periodic-box test cases (N=2 and N=3 beams), with two threshold values per case. The paper itself concedes in Section VI that the continuum limit, with an infinite number of momentum bins, may behave fundamentally differently and could resolve the problem. Because the statement is explicitly generic, the evidence needs either a convergence or robustness test in the number of momentum bins, or the claim should be restricted to discrete-beam models. This is an external-validity gap rather than an internal inconsistency, but it is load-bearing for the paper's primary conclusion.
  3. [Eq. (28) and Figs. 2–4] The quasistaticity criterion is a hand-chosen threshold C on the minimum eigenvalue separation, and the only variation reported is C=0.05/0.03 for the two-beam case and C=0.13/0.06 for the three-beam case. The worsening of agreement as C is decreased is assessed visually from the ⟨Pz⟩ curves, without a quantitative error norm or convergence measure. In addition, exceptional points are not diagnosed directly: Fig. 4 shows eigenvalue merging and nonzero Ω_I, but the text's phrase "bookended by exceptional points if not also punctuated by them" leaves the times of actual eigenvector coalescence unidentified. Reporting a quantitative error metric and a coalescence or condition-number diagnostic for S_n would make the central claim substantially more robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Algorithm 1] The Euler update lines omit the addition of the current value: for example, "P_{q,0}(t+Δt) ← −iN_{q,0}(t)Δt" should read "P_{q,0}(t+Δt) ← P_{q,0}(t) − iN_{q,0}(t)Δt", and the analogous Φ_n and Ψ_n updates have the same issue. In addition, the "match" function should use argmax over j, not max, to select the eigenvector index.
  2. [Figs. 2 and 3 captions] The phrase "The colors indicate the maximum growth rates Ω_I obtained from the eigenanalysis in the hybrid calculation" is ambiguous about what the shaded regions represent and what the color scale encodes; please state explicitly that the non-QS shaded regions are colored by max Ω_I and include a color bar.
  3. [Section III] The beam geometries and initial polarization values for the two- and three-beam test cases are not fully specified in the text; please either define them explicitly or give precise references to the setups in Refs. [71,76,105] so that the calculations can be reproduced without consulting multiple earlier papers.
  4. [Section IV, first paragraph] The parenthetical "exceptional points (i.e., eigenmode degeneracies)" is imprecise: an exceptional point requires coalescence of both eigenvalues and eigenvectors, not merely eigenvalue degeneracy; please adjust the wording to avoid implying that eigenvalue degeneracy alone defines an exceptional point.
  5. [Eq. (33)] The group velocity and force are written with ∂k, where vector notation such as ∇_k would be clearer and would match the interpretation of k as a quasiparticle momentum.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper benchmarks its own flavor-wave transport approximations against direct exact-QKE simulations, so the central claims are externally verified rather than equivalent to their inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper does not claim to derive a new physical prediction from flavor-wave transport; instead it tests two approximations (quasilinear and quasistatic) against direct numerical solution of the exact Fourier-space QKE, Eq. (3). In Sec. III the QL approximation is compared with the exact solution, and in Sec. IV the hybrid method selectively applies the QS approximation while falling back on the exact equation of motion for modes failing the criterion of Eq. (28). The negative results—nonlinear wave-wave coupling can matter, and quasistaticity breaks down near spectral degeneracies—are read off from discrepancies between the approximate and exact solutions, not from the approximations themselves. The threshold C in Eq. (28) is a diagnostic tolerance, not a parameter fitted to the target result; lowering C deliberately applies QS to smaller-gap modes and yields worse agreement, which is the standard adiabatic expectation and is verified rather than assumed. Self-citations to Refs. [72,73,75] supply the formalism under test, but the present numerical tests provide independent evidence. The Sec. VI caveat that the continuum limit may behave fundamentally differently is an external-validity limitation, not a circular step. No specific reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs can be quoted, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical species, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are postulated. The flavor-wave quasiparticles, the miscidynamics background, and the exceptional-point phenomenon are inherited from the cited prior work (Refs. [72,73,75,77,96]). The numerical tests use hand-chosen thresholds and beam configurations, enumerated as free parameters above.

free parameters (5)
  • Quasistatic criterion threshold C = 0.05 and 0.03 (two-beam); 0.13 and 0.06 (three-beam)
    Hand-chosen threshold in Eq. (28) that decides which wave vectors evolve under the QS approximation; the paper's central demonstration, that lower C makes results worse, depends on these choices and they are not derived from error targets.
  • Injection rate ζ = 1 (two-beam), -3/2 (three-beam)
    Dimensionless rate of polarization injection defining the slow-driving protocol (Sec. III); selected to produce the studied scenarios, not fitted to astrophysical data.
  • QL restart time in two-beam case = µt=1500
    The QL solution is reset with exact-simulation data at µt=1500, and this 'choice exaggerates the agreement between theory and simulation'; this is a methodological parameter that directly affects the reported QL success.
  • Subgrid seed fluctuation amplitude = 10^-6
    Initial magnitude for all P_{q,n≠0}; sets the height of the spectrum floor in Fig. 1 and the level at which unstable modes are seeded.
  • Symmetry-test mean polarizations = ⟨P_L⟩=(⟨P_x⟩,0,0.1), ⟨P_R⟩=(⟨P_x⟩,0,0.5), k/µ≈0.021
    Illustrative configuration in Sec. V chosen to scan ⟨P_x⟩ and reveal the onset of instability; values are not derived from a specific astrophysical profile.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Non-Hermitian eigenbasis decomposition exists and is continuous away from exceptional points (Eq. 13); at an exceptional point H_n is not diagonalizable.
    Section II.A, Eq. (13), and Sec. IV: the continuous evolution of Φ_n via Eq. (15) breaks down at exceptional points, which is the premise of the QS breakdown argument.
  • domain assumption The collisionless QKE in the fast-flavor limit with discrete momenta and periodic boundaries (Eqs. 1-3) is an adequate representation of small-scale flavor dynamics in supernova/merger neutrino media.
    Section I and II: the numerical tests solve Eq. (3) exactly and the conclusions are meant to transfer to astrophysical settings; the paper itself worries the continuum limit may behave differently (Sec. VI).
  • ad hoc to paper Flavor-wave eigensystems vary slowly in time (the 'postulate' that enables quasistatic evolution).
    Footnote 3 explicitly calls this 'a postulate, and not an entirely obvious one', backed by the miscidynamics picture from the authors' prior work; the entire QS approximation depends on it.
  • domain assumption Mean polarizations can be replaced by ⟨P_q⟩ ∝ z in the hybrid numerical calculations without losing the physics relevant to QS and QL tests.
    Section IV: 'we set the n=0 vectors to point precisely along ±z, approximating as zero the small, fluctuating transverse parts'; the authors say this improves stability and has no meaningful impact, but it is imposed rather than derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutrino flavor-wave transport: Numerical tests and theoretical challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IFUWH6YV

@misc{pith2026260802984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutrino flavor-wave transport: Numerical tests and theoretical challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IFUWH6YV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02984}
}
read the original abstract

Neutrino quantum kinetics is computationally intractable in the neutrino-dense arenas of core-collapse supernovae and neutron star mergers. Flavor-wave (or flavomon) transport is an emerging approach to this problem in which small-scale flavor inhomogeneities are treated as quasiparticles with properties determined by the local mean background. We present the first numerical calculations of flavor-wave transport under slow driving. Our results show some quantitative successes but also underscore the theoretical challenges that need to be overcome. Two issues are particularly concerning. (1) Nonlinear wave-wave coupling may be important. (2) Degeneracies and small energy gaps are responsible for significant nonadiabatic transitions. Future work will need to address these points if flavor-wave transport is to be viable in settings of astrophysical interest. Other topics examined include flavor-wave parallel transport and flavor-space symmetry breaking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02984 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison between simulation (exact QKE, solid curves) and theory (QL approximation, dashed curves) in the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison of simulation (exact QKE) and theory (hybrid method selectively applying the QS approximation) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real and imaginary parts of eigenvalues Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The imaginary parts of the eigenvalues Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. C. Volpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Fla- vor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025004 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Johns, S

    L. Johns, S. Richers, and M.-R. Wu, Neutrino oscilla- tions in core-collapse supernovae and neutron star merg- ers, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nat

    I. Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 285 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    R. F. Sawyer, Neutrino cloud instabilities just above the neutrino sphere of a supernova, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 081101 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Wu, Y.-Z

    M.-R. Wu, Y.-Z. Qian, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, T. Fischer, and L. Huther, Effects of neutrino oscillations on nucle- osynthesis and neutrino signals for an 18M J supernova model, Phys. Rev. D91, 065016 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Wu and I

    M.-R. Wu and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino conversions: Ubiquitous in compact binary merger remnants, Phys. Rev. D95, 103007 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    M.-R. Wu, I. Tamborra, O. Just, and H.-T. Janka, Imprints of neutrino-pair flavor conversions on nucle- osynthesis in ejecta from neutron-star merger remnants, Phys. Rev. D96, 123015 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Abbar, H

    S. Abbar, H. Duan, K. Sumiyoshi, T. Takiwaki, and M. C. Volpe, On the occurrence of fast neutrino fla- vor conversions in multidimensional supernova models, Phys. Rev. D100, 043004 (2019)

    2019

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Delfan Azari, S

    M. Delfan Azari, S. Yamada, T. Morinaga, W. Iwakami, H. Okawa, H. Nagakura, and K. Sumiyoshi, Linear anal- ysis of fast-pairwise collective neutrino oscillations in core-collapse supernovae based on the results of boltz- mann simulations, Phys. Rev. D99, 103011 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Morinaga, H

    T. Morinaga, H. Nagakura, C. Kato, and S. Yamada, Fast neutrino-flavor conversion in the preshock region of core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 012046 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Xiong, A

    Z. Xiong, A. Sieverding, M. Sen, and Y.-Z. Qian, Poten- tial impact of fast flavor oscillations on neutrino-driven winds and their nucleosynthesis, Astrophys. J.900, 144 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Ko, M.-K

    H. Ko, M.-K. Cheoun, E. Ha, M. Kusakabe, T. Hayakawa, H. Sasaki, T. Kajino, M.-a. Hashimoto, M. Ono, M. D. Usang, S. Chiba, K. Nakamura, A. Tol- stov, K. Nomoto, T. Kawano, and G. J. Mathews, Neu- trino process in core-collapse supernovae with neutrino self-interaction and msw...

    2020

  5. [13]

    George, M.-R

    M. George, M.-R. Wu, I. Tamborra, R. Ardevol- Pulpillo, and H.-T. Janka, Fast neutrino flavor conver- sion, ejecta properties, and nucleosynthesis in newly- formed hypermassive remnants of neutron-star mergers, Phys. Rev. D102, 103015 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Abbar, F

    S. Abbar, F. Capozzi, R. Glas, H.-T. Janka, and I. Tam- borra, On the characteristics of fast neutrino flavor in- stabilities in three-dimensional core-collapse supernova models, Phys. Rev. D103, 063033 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Johns and H

    L. Johns and H. Nagakura, Fast flavor instabilities and the search for neutrino angular crossings, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123012 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Nagakura, A

    H. Nagakura, A. Burrows, L. Johns, and G. M. Fuller, Where, when, and why: Occurrence of fast-pairwise collective neutrino oscillation in three-dimensional core- collapse supernova models, Phys. Rev. D104, 083025 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Li and D

    X. Li and D. M. Siegel, Neutrino fast flavor conversions in neutron-star postmerger accretion disks, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 251101 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    O. Just, S. Abbar, M.-R. Wu, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, and F. Capozzi, Fast neutrino conversion in hydrody- namic simulations of neutrino-cooled accretion disks, Phys. Rev. D105, 083024 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Fern´ andez, S

    R. Fern´ andez, S. Richers, N. Mulyk, and S. Fahlman, Fast flavor instability in hypermassive neutron star disk outflows, Phys. Rev. D106, 103003 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Fujimoto and H

    S.-i. Fujimoto and H. Nagakura, Explosive nucleosyn- thesis with fast neutrino-flavour conversion in core- collapse supernovae, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519, 2623 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Xiong, L

    Z. Xiong, L. Johns, M.-R. Wu, and H. Duan, Collisional flavor instability in dense neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083002 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino flavor conversions can help and hinder neutrino-driven explosions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 061401 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino flavor conversion in core- collapse supernovae: A parametric study in 1D mod- els, Phys. Rev. D107, 103034 (2023), arXiv:2301.11938 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, K. Naka- mura, and K. Kotake, Gravitational-wave signatures of nonstandard neutrino properties in collapsing stellar cores, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 021201 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    Akaho, J

    R. Akaho, J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, and S. Ya- mada, Collisional and fast neutrino flavor instabilities in two-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulation with boltzmann neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. D109, 023012 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, R. Akaho, A. Ito, M. Zaizen, S. Fu- rusawa, and S. Yamada, Muon-induced collisional flavor instability in core-collapse supernova, Phys. Rev. D110, 043039 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Mukhopadhyay, J

    P. Mukhopadhyay, J. Miller, and G. C. McLaughlin, The time evolution of fast flavor crossings in postmerger disks around a black hole remnant, Astrophys. J.974, 110 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Y. Qiu, D. Radice, S. Richers, and M. Bhattacharyya, Neutrino flavor transformation in neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 091401 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Wang and A

    T. Wang and A. Burrows, The effect of the fast-flavor in- stability on core-collapse supernova models, Astrophys. J.986, 153 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    K. A. Lund, P. Mukhopadhyay, J. M. Miller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Angle-dependent in situ fast flavor trans- formations in post-neutron-star-merger disks, Astro- phys. J. Lett.985, L9 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    K. Mori, T. Takiwaki, K. Kotake, and S. Horiuchi, Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova models with phenomenological treatment of neutrino flavor conver- sions, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.77, L9 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    V. A. Kosteleck` y and S. Samuel, Neutrino oscillations 14 in the early universe with an inverted neutrino-mass hi- erarchy, Phys. Lett. B318, 127 (1993)

    1993

  25. [33]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y.-Z. Qian, Collective neu- trino flavor transformation in supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 74, 123004 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    Dasgupta and A

    B. Dasgupta and A. Mirizzi, Temporal instability en- ables neutrino flavor conversions deep inside super- novae, Phys. Rev. D92, 125030 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Neutrino quantum kinet- ics in a core-collapse supernova, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.09, 021, arXiv:2406.09504 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Theory of neutrino slow flavor evolution. part i. homogeneous medium, J. High Energy Phys.2025(4), 146

    2025

  29. [37]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Theory of neutrino slow flavor evolution. part ii. space-time evolution of linear instabilities, J. High Energy Phys.2025(6), 146

    2025

  30. [38]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, H.-T. Janka, and G. G. Raffelt, Neutrino-mass-driven instabilities as the earliest flavor conversion in supernovae, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 231003 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Johns, Collisional Flavor Instabilities of Super- nova Neutrinos, Phys

    L. Johns, Collisional Flavor Instabilities of Super- nova Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 191001 (2023), arXiv:2104.11369 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Johns and Z

    L. Johns and Z. Xiong, Collisional instabilities of neu- trinos and their interplay with fast flavor conversion in compact objects, Phys. Rev. D106, 103029 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Xiong, M.-R

    Z. Xiong, M.-R. Wu, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, T. Fischer, M. George, C.-Y. Lin, and L. Johns, Evolution of col- lisional neutrino flavor instabilities in spherically sym- metric supernova models, Phys. Rev. D107, 083016 (2023), arXiv:2210.08254 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Xiong, L

    Z. Xiong, L. Johns, M.-R. Wu, and H. Duan, Collisional flavor instability in dense neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083002 (2023), arXiv:2212.03750 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    J. Liu, M. Zaizen, and S. Yamada, Systematic study of the resonancelike structure in the collisional flavor in- stability of neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D107, 123011 (2023), arXiv:2302.06263 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, R. Akaho, A. Ito, M. Zaizen, and S. Yamada, Universality of the neutrino collisional fla- vor instability in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D108, 123024 (2023), arXiv:2310.05050 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Akaho, J

    R. Akaho, J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, and S. Ya- mada, Collisional and fast neutrino flavor instabilities in two-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulation with Boltzmann neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. D109, 023012 (2024), arXiv:2311.11272 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Do neutrinos become flavor unstable due to collisions with matter in the supernova decoupling region?, Phys. Rev. D109, 103011 (2024), arXiv:2307.10366 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    C. Kato, H. Nagakura, and L. Johns, Collisional flavor swap with neutrino self-interactions, Phys. Rev. D109, 103009 (2024), arXiv:2309.02619 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Froustey, S

    J. Froustey, S. Richers, E. Grohs, S. D. Flynn, F. Fou- cart, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Neutrino fast flavor oscillations with moments: Linear stability analy- sis and application to neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D109, 043046 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    T. Wang, H. Nagakura, L. Johns, and A. Burrows, Ef- fect of the collisional flavor instability on core-collapse supernova models, Phys. Rev. D112, 063039 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y.-Z. Qian, Collective neu- trino oscillations, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 569 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. Raffelt, Collective neutrino flavor conversion: Recent develop- ments, Nucl. Phys. B908, 366 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Tamborra and S

    I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar, New developments in fla- vor evolution of a dense neutrino gas, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Johns, H

    L. Johns, H. Nagakura, G. M. Fuller, and A. Burrows, Fast oscillations, collisionless relaxation, and spurious evolution of supernova neutrino flavor, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103017 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Neutrino decoupling is al- tered by flavor conversion, Phys. Rev. D108, 043006 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Shalgar, On the length scale of collective neutrino oscillations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06422 (2024)

    S. Shalgar, On the length scale of collective neutrino oscillations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06422 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Nagakura, M

    H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, J. Liu, and L. Johns, Reso- lution requirements for numerical modeling of neutrino quantum kinetics, Phys. Rev. D111, 043028 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    Myers, T

    M. Myers, T. Cooper, M. Warren, J. Kneller, G. McLaughlin, S. Richers, E. Grohs, and C. Fr¨ ohlich, Neutrino flavor mixing with moments, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123036 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Grohs, S

    E. Grohs, S. Richers, S. M. Couch, F. Foucart, J. P. Kneller, and G. McLaughlin, Neutrino fast flavor insta- bility in three dimensions for a neutron star merger, Phys. Lett. B846, 138210 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Grohs, S

    E. Grohs, S. Richers, S. M. Couch, F. Foucart, J. Froustey, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaugh- lin, Two-moment Neutrino Flavor Transformation with Applications to the Fast Flavor Instability in Neu- tron Star Mergers, Astrophys. J.963, 11 (2024), arXiv:2309.00972 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Froustey, S

    J. Froustey, S. Richers, E. Grohs, S. D. Flynn, F. Fou- cart, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Neutrino fast flavor oscillations with moments: Linear stability analy- sis and application to neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D109, 043046 (2024), arXiv:2311.11968 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. P. Kneller, J. Froustey, E. B. Grohs, F. Foucart, G. C. McLaughlin, and S. Richers, Quantum closures for neutrino moment transport, Phys. Rev. D111, 063046 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Froustey, J

    J. Froustey, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Quan- tum maximum entropy closure for small flavor coher- ence, Phys. Rev. D111, 063022 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Grohs, S

    E. Grohs, S. Richers, J. Froustey, F. Foucart, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Advection algorithms for quantum neutrino moment transport, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083018 (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    Xiong, M.-R

    Z. Xiong, M.-R. Wu, M. George, and C.-Y. Lin, Robust integration of fast flavor conversions in classical neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 051003 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    Nagakura, L

    H. Nagakura, L. Johns, and M. Zaizen, Bhatnagar- gross-krook subgrid model for neutrino quantum kinet- ics, Phys. Rev. D109, 083013 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Zaizen and H

    M. Zaizen and H. Nagakura, Simple method for deter- mining asymptotic states of fast neutrino-flavor conver- sion, Phys. Rev. D107, 103022 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Zaizen, Spectral diversity in collisional neutrino- flavor conversion: Flavor equipartition or swap, Phys

    M. Zaizen, Spectral diversity in collisional neutrino- flavor conversion: Flavor equipartition or swap, Phys. Rev. D111, 103029 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    Padilla-Gay, H.-H

    I. Padilla-Gay, H.-H. Chen, S. Abbar, M.-R. Wu, and Z. Xiong, Flavor equilibration of supernova neutrinos: 15 Exploring the dynamics of slow modes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043039 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    Froustey, Predicting the outcome of collisional neu- trino flavor conversion, Phys

    J. Froustey, Predicting the outcome of collisional neu- trino flavor conversion, Phys. Rev. D112, 023029 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, L. Johns, and S. Ya- mada, Asymptotic states of fast neutrino-flavor conver- sions in the three-flavor framework, Phys. Rev. D111, 123004 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    Urquilla and L

    E. Urquilla and L. Johns, Testing common approxima- tions of neutrino fast flavor conversion, Phys. Rev. D 113, 103013 (2026)

    2026

  64. [72]

    Johns, Subgrid modeling of neutrino oscillations in astrophysics, Phys

    L. Johns, Subgrid modeling of neutrino oscillations in astrophysics, Phys. Rev. D112, 043024 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Johns, Thermodynamics of oscillating neutrinos, Phys

    L. Johns, Thermodynamics of oscillating neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D112, 063032 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    A. Kost, L. Johns, and H. Duan, Once-in-a-lifetime en- counter models for neutrino media. ii. quasisteady states and miscidynamic flavor evolution, Phys. Rev. D112, 103004 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    Johns and A

    L. Johns and A. Kost, Local-equilibrium theory of neutrino oscillations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03271 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Fast Flavor Conver- sions at the Edge of Instability in a Two-Beam Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 221004 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Collective flavor conversions are interactions of neutrinos with quantized flavor waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211003 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    D. F. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Flavomon ray tracing in matter gradients, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.18689 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  71. [79]

    D. F. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Quasi-linear theory of fast flavor instabilities in homogeneous environments, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28854 (2026)

    2026

  72. [80]

    Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys

    L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D17, 2369 (1978)

    1978

  73. [81]

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonance enhance- ment of oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spec- troscopy, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.42, 913 (1985)

    1985

  74. [82]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Sim- ulation of coherent nonlinear neutrino flavor transfor- mation in the supernova environment: Correlated neu- trino trajectories, Phys. Rev. D74, 105014 (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Co- herent development of neutrino flavor in the supernova environment, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 241101 (2006)

    2006

  76. [84]

    G. G. Raffelt and A. Y. Smirnov, Self-induced spectral splits in supernova neutrino fluxes, Phys. Rev. D76, 081301 (2007)

    2007

  77. [85]

    G. G. Raffelt and A. Y. Smirnov, Adiabaticity and spec- tral splits in collective neutrino transformations, Phys. Rev. D76, 125008 (2007)

    2007

  78. [86]

    A. Kost, L. Johns, and H. Duan, Once-in-a-lifetime en- counter models for neutrino media: From coherent oscil- lations to flavor equilibration, Phys. Rev. D109, 103037 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Johns and S

    L. Johns and S. Rodriguez, Collisional flavor pendula and neutrino quantum thermodynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10340 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Hannestad, G

    S. Hannestad, G. G. Raffelt, G. Sigl, and Y. Y. Wong, Self-induced conversion in dense neutrino gases: Pendu- lum in flavor space, Phys. Rev. D74, 105010 (2006)

    2006

  81. [89]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Analysis of collective neutrino flavor transformation in supernovae, Phys. Rev. D75, 125005 (2007)

    2007

  82. [90]

    Johns and G

    L. Johns and G. M. Fuller, Strange mechanics of the neutrino flavor pendulum, Phys. Rev. D97, 023020 (2018)

    2018

  83. [91]

    Johns, H

    L. Johns, H. Nagakura, G. M. Fuller, and A. Burrows, Neutrino oscillations in supernovae: Angular moments and fast instabilities, Phys. Rev. D101, 043009 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Padilla-Gay, I

    I. Padilla-Gay, I. Tamborra, and G. G. Raffelt, Neutrino flavor pendulum reloaded: The case of fast pairwise con- version, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 121102 (2022)

    2022

  85. [93]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Slow and fast col- lective neutrino oscillations: Invariants and reciprocity, Phys. Rev. D107, 043024 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Dighe, and G. Raffelt, Linearized flavor- stability analysis of dense neutrino streams, Phys. Rev. D84, 053013 (2011)

    2011

  87. [95]

    Izaguirre, G

    I. Izaguirre, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast pairwise conversion of supernova neutrinos: A dispersion relation approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 021101 (2017)

    2017

  88. [96]

    J. Liu, L. Johns, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, and S. Ya- mada, Dynamical equilibria of fast neutrino flavor con- version, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26418 (2025)

    2025

  89. [97]

    Morinaga, Fast neutrino flavor instability and neu- trino flavor lepton number crossings, Phys

    T. Morinaga, Fast neutrino flavor instability and neu- trino flavor lepton number crossings, Phys. Rev. D105, L101301 (2022)

    2022

  90. [98]

    Mirizzi, G

    A. Mirizzi, G. Mangano, and N. Saviano, Self-induced flavor instabilities of a dense neutrino stream in a two- dimensional model, Phys. Rev. D92, 021702 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    Dattoli, R

    G. Dattoli, R. Mignani, and A. Torre, Geometrical phase in the cyclic evolution of non-hermitian systems, J. Phys. A23, 5795 (1990)

    1990

  92. [100]

    Mehri-Dehnavi and A

    H. Mehri-Dehnavi and A. Mostafazadeh, Geometric phase for non-hermitian hamiltonians and its holonomy interpretation, J. Math. Phys.49, 082105 (2008)

    2008

  93. [101]

    He, X.-Q

    X.-G. He, X.-Q. Li, B. H. J. McKellar, and Y. Zhang, Berry phase in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D72, 053012 (2005)

    2005

  94. [102]

    Johns and G

    L. Johns and G. M. Fuller, Geometric phases in neutrino oscillations with nonlinear refraction, Phys. Rev. D95, 043003 (2017)

    2017

  95. [103]

    Johns, Geometric and majorana phases in neutrino oscillations, Phys

    L. Johns, Geometric and majorana phases in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D105, 033002 (2022)

    2022

  96. [104]

    Ib´ a˜ nez and J

    S. Ib´ a˜ nez and J. G. Muga, Adiabaticity condition for non-hermitian hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A89, 033403 (2014)

    2014

  97. [105]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, L. Johns, R. Akaho, and S. Yamada, Quasisteady evolution of fast neutrino- flavor conversions, Phys. Rev. D111, 023051 (2025)

    2025

  98. [106]

    Richers, H

    S. Richers, H. Duan, M.-R. Wu, S. Bhattacharyya, M. Zaizen, M. George, C.-Y. Lin, and Z. Xiong, Code comparison for fast flavor instability simulations, Phys. Rev. D106, 043011 (2022), arXiv:2205.06282 [astro- ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  99. [107]

    G. G. Raffelt and G. Sigl, Self-induced decoherence in dense neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D75, 083002 (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.