REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 92 references
Earth Embeddings
T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Earth observation is shifting from run-your-own foundation models to precomputed embedding products that act as reusable data.
desk verdict A timely, honest survey of Earth embedding products—no new science, but the product tables and reproducibility analysis make it a useful reference for practitioners. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The organizing object is the Earth embedding itself: a reusable vector representation of a location, patch, pixel, or time period, packaged and distributed as a data product. The chapter's analytical machinery is a three-way taxonomy—implicit location encoders ($f_{\mathrm{loc}}$), explicit patch encoders ($f_{\mathrm{img}}$ over single mosaics), and explicit pixel encoders ($f_{\mathrm{1D}}$ or $f_{\mathrm{3D}}$ over time series)—together with the design choices that carry the empirical weight: how pixel embeddings are pooled into patches, whether embeddings are fused with one another, and whether evaluation uses spatial or temporal splits. Storage and reproducibility tables supply the cost side of the argument, showing that pixel-level products at 10 m resolution reach tens of terabytes for a continent-scale year.
What would settle it
Run every embedding product named in the chapter through one shared benchmark with identical tasks, spatial splits, temporal windows, and pooling rules; if any single product finishes at or near the top across all tasks, the 'no single best embedding' claim fails. A simpler audit is to check the coverage and license tables against each product's own release pages for a missing or mislabeled major entry.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper's central claim is that the reusable vector output of Earth-observation models—an Earth embedding—has become a product category in its own right, decoupled from the imagery and models that produced it. It argues the field should be understood as a landscape of three families: implicit location encoders that map coordinates directly to vectors without requiring imagery at inference time; patch embeddings that summarize mosaics or tiles; and pixel embeddings that produce dense per-pixel vectors from time series. Surveying the available products and the studies that use them, the chapter concludes that explicit pixel embeddings currently have the strongest experimental support for land-cover-like mapping and spatial prediction, that semantic search is promising but under-benchmarked, and that time-series tasks remain weakly evaluated. The load-bearing empirical summary is task dependence: pooling strategy, fusion with other embeddings, and spatial transfer setting all change results, so no product dominates across all tasks.
Load-bearing premise
The chapter's advice rests on the completeness of its product catalog and on trusting the third-party studies it summarizes, and it does not rerun those experiments.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Practitioners can treat published embeddings as analysis-ready covariates or indexes, replacing hand-built spectral-temporal features and large model runs for many tasks.
- No embedding should be adopted without per-task validation under spatial and temporal splits, because pooling, fusion, and transfer setting materially change accuracy.
- Fusing complementary embedding products can beat the best single embedding in a majority of tested tasks, so portfolios of embeddings may be more useful than a single winner.
- Storage and reproducibility belong in evaluation: permissive licenses and quantized formats such as PCA to 64 dimensions with int8 (under 2% accuracy loss) make planetary-scale reuse practical.
- Shared, independently maintained benchmarks are the next scientific bottleneck; current products are evaluated under incompatible protocols, and identical models have been reported with accuracy differences exceeding ten points.
Reading between the lines
- If the task-dependence conclusion holds, the community's next step should be a standardized embedding index with metadata and uncertainty layers, not a quest for one universal model.
- The terrestrial and Sentinel/Landsat bias of existing products makes ocean, atmospheric, snow, and infrastructure embeddings a natural, testable next frontier.
- Quantization results suggest that much of the useful signal lives in a low-dimensional subspace; checking whether intrinsic dimension predicts transfer performance would turn that redundancy finding into a design rule.
- A shared benchmark covering all three embedding families under one protocol would give the field the direct test the paper's own evidence points toward, and the paper predicts no single winner.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This manuscript is a book chapter that synthesizes the emerging landscape of 'Earth embeddings' -- reusable vector representations of locations, image patches, or pixels derived from Earth observation data. It proposes a taxonomy (implicit location encoders, explicit patch embeddings, explicit pixel embeddings), catalogs available products (Tables 1-3), reviews downstream applications in land cover, agriculture, ecology, hazards, socioeconomic analysis, and search/retrieval (Section 3), presents two TorchGeo-based case studies (Section 4), analyzes the evidence for when embeddings help and when they do not (Section 5), audits model/data/product licenses (Tables 4-6), and closes with storage, compression, and benchmarking recommendations (Sections 6-7). The chapter makes no new empirical contributions; its value lies in synthesis and practical guidance.
Significance. If the synthesis is accurate, this chapter would serve as a useful reference for practitioners and researchers navigating a rapidly growing field. Its strengths are the clear taxonomy, careful hedging of claims, explicit license/reproducibility tables, concrete storage-cost estimates (Table 8), and reproducible code examples. The main qualitative conclusions -- that the field is moving toward embedding products and that no single embedding is best across tasks -- are plausible and consistent with the cited studies. However, since the chapter contains no original experiments and its factual core consists of third-party results and a self-assembled product catalog, its scientific value hinges on the reliability and completeness of that evidence base, which the chapter itself partially calls into question in Section 7.4.
major comments (2)
- [Section 5 and Section 7.4] The central conclusion in Section 5 -- that 'there is no single best embedding across all downstream tasks' -- is based on a small set of third-party studies (Corley, Robinson, et al. 2026; van der Plas et al. 2026; Ma et al. 2026). Section 7.4 simultaneously reports an audit (Corley, Lehmann, et al. 2026) finding that identical geospatial foundation models differ by over ten points on the same benchmark and that most papers use incomparable training configurations. The paper should explicitly reconcile these two positions: either state that the Section 5 comparisons are provisional and could be affected by the same reproducibility problems, or qualify each cited result in light of the audit. As written, a reader may treat the task-dependence conclusion as more robust than the paper's own evidence base allows.
- [Section 6 (Tables 4-6)] The product and license tables are presented as complete ('all known embedding products'), but the chapter does not describe the methodology by which this inventory was compiled: which sources were consulted, how license terms were verified, and on what date the information was checked. Since Sections 6 and 7's practical guidance depends on these classifications (e.g., the claim that 'patch embeddings have the best reproducibility'), the authors should add a short note explaining their survey procedure and the date of last verification, and acknowledge that licenses can change.
minor comments (6)
- [Section 2.2] Section 2.2 refers to 'our mathematical definition in Equation 2.1,' but the only numbered equations in Section 2.1 are (1) and (2); please correct the cross-reference.
- [Section 5] The benchmark name 'EuroSA T-Embed' appears with a space; if this is 'EuroSAT-Embed,' please correct the spelling.
- [Section 7.2] The statement 'Binary quantization compresses the raw embedding payload a further 32x' is ambiguous about the baseline (float32 or int8); if the baseline is the preceding PCA+int8 representation, binary quantization should yield 8x compression, not 32x, so the sentence should be clarified.
- [Section 7.2] In the prose following Table 8, 'monthly storage bills of under a dollar from hundreds of dollars' does not match the table's cost range, where Presto is about $1,600 per month; consider writing 'hundreds to thousands of dollars'.
- [Section 4] The claim that 'TorchGeo provides data loaders for all known embedding products' is stronger than the evidence presented; consider limiting the claim to the products covered in this chapter.
- [Tables 4-6] Composite license codes such as 'badn' and 'bna' are not explained in the legend; please add a note defining how multiple symbols combine.
Circularity Check
Survey chapter with no derivation; all empirical claims are attributed to external benchmarks and product documentation, so no circularity is present.
full rationale
This is a review/survey book chapter; it contains no fitted parameters, no equations that define an output in terms of an input, and no derivation that could reduce to its own premises. The central framing (shift from foundation models to embedding products) is attributed to concept papers, including the authors' own Fang et al. (2026) and Klemmer et al. (2025), but it is a framing statement, and the chapter's substantive claims are supported by external studies (Ma et al. 2026; Corley, Robinson, et al. 2026; van der Plas et al. 2026) and product documentation (e.g., Earth Genome 2025; Feng et al. 2026). The taxonomy of implicit/patch/pixel embeddings is a definitional organizational scheme, not a prediction derived from data. The storage-cost estimates in Table 8 are arithmetic from published product grids and are attributed to Corley (2026), not fitted. Section 7.4's admission that geospatial foundation model papers are often irreproducible is a limitation statement about the literature, not an internal circular step. The only self-citation-heavy passages are framing and software (TorchGeo) mentions; none is load-bearing in the sense of making a result true by construction. Therefore the circularity score is 0.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (3)
- domain assumption The cited third-party evaluations accurately report their benchmark results.
- domain assumption The product and license tables are complete and correct as of July 2026.
- domain assumption Earth observation data is a distinct ML modality requiring specialized representations.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Earth Embeddings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6GEVOEIT
@misc{pith2026260803410,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Earth Embeddings},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6GEVOEIT}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03410}
}
read the original abstract
Earth observation is moving from foundation models that users must run themselves toward embedding products that package model feature outputs as reusable data without needing to download and process the imagery used to generate them. Earth embeddings are vectors that summarize locations, image patches, or pixels, letting users analyze compact features instead of repeatedly training or running large models on raw satellite imagery. This chapter explains the main types of Earth embeddings, from implicit location encoders to explicit patch and pixel products, and compares their coverage, resolution, dimensionality, storage cost, licenses, and reproducibility. We review their use in land cover and crop mapping, ecological and hazard modeling, socioeconomic prediction, and semantic search, with evidence on when embeddings improve on conventional features and when pooling, fusion, or spatial transfer limit performance. Two case studies show practical workflows for similarity search and land cover mapping. We close with guidance for choosing, evaluating, storing, compressing, and publishing embeddings, and with open problems in oceanic and atmospheric coverage, uncertainty, and benchmarking.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
and Hanna, Jo
Xiong, Zhitong and Wang, Yi and Zhang, Fahong and Stewart, Adam J. and Hanna, Jo. Neural Plasticity-Inspired Multimodal Foundation Model for. 2024 , doi=
2024
-
[2]
2024 , organization=
Francis, Alistair and Czerkawski, Mikolaj , booktitle=. 2024 , organization=
2024
-
[3]
Czerkawski, Mikolaj and Kluczek, Marcin and Bojanowski, Jędrzej S. , year=. Global and dense embeddings of
-
[4]
and Zhu, Xiao Xiang , journal=
Wang, Yi and Ait Ali Braham, Nassim and Xiong, Zhitong and Liu, Chenying and Albrecht, Conrad M. and Zhu, Xiao Xiang , journal=. 2023 , publisher=
2023
-
[5]
and Wang, Yi and Chang, Yi-Chia and Ait Ali Braham, Nassim and Sehgal, Shradha and Robinson, Caleb and Banerjee, Arindam , booktitle=
Stewart, Adam and Lehmann, Nils and Corley, Isaac A. and Wang, Yi and Chang, Yi-Chia and Ait Ali Braham, Nassim and Sehgal, Shradha and Robinson, Caleb and Banerjee, Arindam , booktitle=. 2023 , doi=
2023
-
[6]
2024 , organization=
Nedungadi, Vishal and Kariryaa, Ankit and Oehmcke, Stefan and Belongie, Serge and Igel, Christian and Lang, Nico , booktitle=. 2024 , organization=
2024
-
[7]
and Zhu, Xiao Xiang , journal=
Wang, Yi and Albrecht, Conrad M. and Zhu, Xiao Xiang , journal=. Multilabel-Guided Soft Contrastive Learning for Efficient. 2024 , publisher=
2024
-
[8]
and Dujardin, Thomas and Bountos, Nikolaos Ioannis and Zavras, Angelos and Gerken, Franziska and Papoutsis, Ioannis and Leal-Taix
Wang, Yi and Xiong, Zhitong and Liu, Chenying and Stewart, Adam J. and Dujardin, Thomas and Bountos, Nikolaos Ioannis and Zavras, Angelos and Gerken, Franziska and Papoutsis, Ioannis and Leal-Taix. Towards a Unified. Proceedings of the. 2025 , doi=
2025
Show all 92 references
-
[9]
Hersbach, Hans and Bell, Bill and Berrisford, Paul and Hirahara, Shoji and Horányi, András and Muñoz-Sabater, Joaquín and Nicolas, Julien and Peubey, Carole and Radu, Raluca and Schepers, Dinand and Simmons, Adrian and Soci, Cornel and Abdalla, Saleh and Abellan, Xavier and Ba...
2020
-
[10]
and Immitzer, Markus and Jackson, Toby and Ball, James and Coomes, David A
Feng, Zhengpeng and Atzberger, Clement and Jaffer, Sadiq and Knezevic, Jovana and Sormunen, Silja and Young, Robin and Lisaius, Madeline C. and Immitzer, Markus and Jackson, Toby and Ball, James and Coomes, David A. and Madhavapeddy, Anil and Blake, Andrew and Keshav, Srinivas...
-
[11]
and Kazmierski, Michal R
Brown, Christopher F. and Kazmierski, Michal R. and Pasquarella, Valerie J. and Rucklidge, William J. and Samsikova, Masha and Zhang, Chenhui and Shelhamer, Evan and Lahera, Estefania and Wiles, Olivia and Ilyushchenko, Simon and Gorelick, Noel and Zhang, Lihui Lydia and Alj, ...
-
[12]
2023 , url=
Lightweight, pre-trained transformers for remote sensing timeseries , author=. 2023 , url=
2023
-
[13]
2025 , doi=
Cropland mapping using geospatial embeddings , author=. 2025 , doi=
2025
-
[14]
Scientific Data , volume=
Schneider, Maja and Schelte, Tobias and Schmitz, Felix and K. Scientific Data , volume=. 2023 , publisher=
2023
-
[15]
and Robinson, Caleb and Corley, Isaac A
Stewart, Adam J. and Robinson, Caleb and Corley, Isaac A. and Ortiz, Anthony and Lavista Ferres, Juan M. and Banerjee, Arindam , title =. 2025 , doi =
2025
-
[16]
Measuring the intrinsic dimension of
Rao, Arjun and Ru. Measuring the intrinsic dimension of. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
-
[17]
2025 , doi=
Leveraging Compact Satellite Embeddings and Graph Neural Networks for Large-Scale Poverty Mapping , author=. 2025 , doi=
2025
-
[18]
and Heidler, Konrad and Wang, Yuanyuan and Yuan, Zhenghang and Dujardin, Thomas and Xu, Qingsong and Shi, Yilei , title=
Zhu, Xiao Xiang and Xiong, Zhitong and Wang, Yi and Stewart, Adam J. and Heidler, Konrad and Wang, Yuanyuan and Yuan, Zhenghang and Dujardin, Thomas and Xu, Qingsong and Shi, Yilei , title=. Communications Earth & Environment , volume=. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[19]
Earth Embeddings: Harnessing the information in
Rolf, Esther and Klemmer, Konstantin and Ru. Earth Embeddings: Harnessing the information in. Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Frontiers , pages=. 2025 , doi=
2025
-
[20]
2019 , doi=
Yin, Yifang and Liu, Zhenguang and Zhang, Ying and Wang, Sheng and Shah, Rajiv Ratn and Zimmermann, Roger , booktitle=. 2019 , doi=
2019
-
[21]
Proceedings of the Seventh
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , author=. Proceedings of the Seventh. 1999 , organization=
1999
-
[22]
Proceedings of the 29th
Learning multi-context aware location representations from large-scale geotagged images , author=. Proceedings of the 29th. 2021 , doi=
2021
-
[23]
International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
-
[24]
2023 , organization=
Mai, Gengchen and Lao, Ni and He, Yutong and Song, Jiaming and Ermon, Stefano , booktitle=. 2023 , organization=
2023
-
[25]
Proceedings of the
Going deeper with convolutions , author=. Proceedings of the. 2015 , doi=
2015
-
[26]
Proceedings of the
Deep residual learning for image recognition , author=. Proceedings of the. 2016 , doi=
2016
-
[27]
International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=
Spatial implicit neural representations for global-scale species mapping , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=
2023
-
[28]
2023 , doi=
Vivanco Cepeda, Vicente and Nayak, Gaurav Kumar and Shah, Mubarak , booktitle=. 2023 , doi=
2023
-
[29]
International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
-
[30]
Nature , volume=
Learning representations by back-propagating errors , author=. Nature , volume=. 1986 , publisher=
1986
-
[31]
2025 , organization=
Sastry, Srikumar and Khanal, Subash and Dhakal, Aayush and Ahmad, Adeel and Jacobs, Nathan , booktitle=. 2025 , organization=
2025
-
[32]
2026 , publisher=
Liu, Zeping and Lao, Ni and Wang, Zhangyu and Jiao, Junfeng and Mai, Gengchen , journal=. 2026 , publisher=
2026
-
[33]
Astruc, Guillaume and Trulls, Eduard and Hosang, Jan and Landrieu, Loic and Sarlin, Paul-Edouard , booktitle=
-
[34]
International Journal of Geographical Information Science , volume=
The equal. International Journal of Geographical Information Science , volume=. 2019 , publisher=
2019
-
[35]
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
-
[36]
and Swetha, Sirnam and Shah, Mubarak , booktitle=
Shatwell, David G. and Swetha, Sirnam and Shah, Mubarak , booktitle=
-
[37]
Górski, K. M. and Hivon, Eric and Banday, A. J. and Wandelt, Benjamin D. and Hansen, Frode K. and Reinecke, M. and Bartelmann, M. , journal=. 2005 , doi=
2005
-
[38]
Proceedings of the
Klemmer, Konstantin and Rolf, Esther and Robinson, Caleb and Mackey, Lester and Ru. Proceedings of the. 2025 , doi=
2025
-
[39]
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
Attention is all you need , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
-
[40]
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
-
[41]
2025 , doi=
Dhakal, Aayush and Sastry, Srikumar and Khanal, Subash and Ahmad, Adeel and Xing, Eric and Jacobs, Nathan , booktitle=. 2025 , doi=
2025
-
[42]
2025 , doi=
Climplicit: Climatic implicit embeddings for global ecological tasks , author=. 2025 , doi=
2025
-
[43]
Nature Communications , volume=
A generalizable and accessible approach to machine learning with global satellite imagery , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2021 , publisher=
2021
-
[44]
and Schmitt, Michael , booktitle=
Madadikhaljan, Mojgan and Prexl, Jonathan and Wittmann, Isabelle and Albrecht, Conrad M. and Schmitt, Michael , booktitle=. Location Is All You Need: Continuous Spatiotemporal Neural Representations of
-
[45]
Zheng, Yijie and Wu, Weijie and Wu, Bingyue and Zhao, Long and Li, Guoqing and Czerkawski, Mikolaj and Klemmer, Konstantin , year=
-
[46]
Democratizing planetary-scale analysis: An ultra-lightweight
Chen, Shuang and Wang, Jie and Yuan, Shuai and Li, Jiayang and Xia, Yu and Liao, Yuanhong and Wei, Junbo and Yuan, Jincheng and Xu, Xiaoqing and Zhu, Xiaolin and Zhu, Peng and Zhang, Hongsheng and Zhou, Yuyu and Fu, Haohuan and Huang, Huabing and Chen, Bin and Dai, Fan and Gon...
2026
-
[47]
Nature Methods , volume=
Reproducibility standards for machine learning in the life sciences , author=. Nature Methods , volume=. 2021 , publisher=
2021
-
[48]
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
-
[49]
Proceedings of the
Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners , author=. Proceedings of the. 2022 , doi=
2022
-
[50]
Proceedings of the
Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning , author=. Proceedings of the. 2020 , doi=
2020
-
[51]
International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2020 , organization=
2020
-
[52]
Stewart and Isaac Corley and Xiao Xiang Zhu and Hossein Azizpour , title =
Heng Fang and Adam J. Stewart and Isaac Corley and Xiao Xiang Zhu and Hossein Azizpour , title =. 2026 , doi =
2026
-
[53]
Ishikawa, Takayuki and Bonannella, Carmelo and Lerink, Bas J. W. and Ru. Assessing the Effectiveness of Deep Embeddings for Tree Species Classification in the. 2025 , doi=
2025
-
[54]
, journal=
Ma, Yuchi and Shen, Yawen and Swatantran, Anu and Lobell, David B. , journal=. Harvesting. 2026 , publisher=
2026
-
[55]
From Landslide Conditioning Factors to Satellite Embeddings: Evaluating the Utilisation of
Cheng, Yusen and Zhu, Qinfeng and Fan, Lei , year=. From Landslide Conditioning Factors to Satellite Embeddings: Evaluating the Utilisation of
-
[56]
Inferring Height from
Hamoudzadeh, Alireza and Belloni, Valeria and Ravanelli, Roberta , year=. Inferring Height from
-
[57]
Characterizing
Heiman, Alice , year=. Characterizing
-
[58]
and Mendes, Fl
Joseph, Maxwell B. and Mendes, Fl. Continuous biome representations from. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[59]
and Last, Christina , year=
Rahman, Mashrekur and Barrett, Samuel J. and Last, Christina , year=. Characterizing
-
[60]
2026 , doi=
Any Model, Any Place, Any Time: Get Remote Sensing Foundation Model Embeddings On Demand , author=. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[61]
From Pixels to Patches: Pooling Strategies for
Corley, Isaac and Robinson, Caleb and Becker-Reshef, Inbal and. From Pixels to Patches: Pooling Strategies for. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[62]
and Bakermans, Jacob J
van der Plas, Thijs L. and Bakermans, Jacob J. W. and Nedungadi, Vishal and Tij. Better Together: Evaluating the Complementarity of. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[63]
and Ganguly, Auroop R
Benavides-Martinez, Ivan Felipe and Guthrie, Justin and Arias, Jhon Edwin and Garces-Gomez, Yeison Alberto and Guzman-Alvis, Angela Ines and Portilla-Cabrera, Cristiam Victoriano and Mondal, Somnath and Allyn, Andrew J. and Ganguly, Auroop R. , year=. What on
-
[64]
2026 , doi=
Earth Embeddings Reveal Diverse Urban Signals from Space , author=. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[65]
and Rolf, Esther , year=
Betti, Livia and Ricke, Sebastian and Obadic, Ivica and Stewart, Adam J. and Rolf, Esther , year=. What's in an
-
[66]
and Chirici, Gherardo , journal=
Francini, Saverio and Schelhaas, Mart-Jan and Vangi, Elia and Lerink, Bas and Nabuurs, Gert-Jan and McRoberts, Ronald E. and Chirici, Gherardo , journal=. Forest species mapping and area proportion estimation combining. 2024 , publisher=
2024
-
[67]
2021 , doi=
On the opportunities and risks of foundation models , author=. 2021 , doi=
2021
-
[68]
2013 , doi=
Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space , author=. 2013 , doi=
2013
-
[69]
2019 , doi=
Devlin, Jacob and Chang, Ming-Wei and Lee, Kenton and Toutanova, Kristina , booktitle=. 2019 , doi=
2019
-
[70]
International Conference on Machine Learning , volume=
Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , volume=. 2021 , organization=
2021
-
[71]
Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , volume=
Position: Mission critical--satellite data is a distinct modality in machine learning , author=. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , volume=
-
[72]
Seasonal Contrast: Unsupervised Pre-Training from Uncurated Remote Sensing Data , author=. 2021. 2021 , doi=
2021
-
[73]
2022 , doi=
Cong, Yezhen and Khanna, Samar and Meng, Chenlin and Liu, Patrick and Rozi, Erik and He, Yutong and Burke, Marshall and Lobell, David and Ermon, Stefano , booktitle=. 2022 , doi=
2022
-
[74]
2023 , doi=
Foundation models for generalist geospatial artificial intelligence , author=. 2023 , doi=
2023
-
[75]
2026 , doi=
No One Knows the State of the Art in Geospatial Foundation Models , author=. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[76]
2023 , doi=
Lacoste, Alexandre and Lehmann, Nils and Rodriguez, Pau and Sherwin, Evan David and Kerner, Hannah and Lütjens, Björn and Irvin, Jeremy Andrew and Dao, David and Alemohammad, Hamed and Drouin, Alexandre and Gunturkun, Mehmet and Huang, Gabriel and Vazquez, David and Newman, Da...
2023
-
[77]
2026 , publisher=
Marsocci, Valerio and Jia, Yuru and Le Bellier, Georges and Kerekes, David and Zeng, Liang and Hafner, Sebastian and Gerard, Sebastian and Brune, Eric and Yadav, Ritu and Shibli, Ali and Fang, Heng and Ban, Yifang and Vergauwen, Maarten and Audebert, Nicolas and Nascetti, Andr...
2026
-
[78]
2025 , publisher=
Lossy neural compression for geospatial analytics: A review , author=. 2025 , publisher=
2025
-
[79]
2026 , month = may, url =
Anthropic , title =. 2026 , month = may, url =
2026
-
[80]
Earth Embeddings: Towards
Klemmer, Konstantin and Rolf, Esther and Rußwurm, Marc and Camps-Valls, Gustau and Czerkawski, Mikolaj and Ermon, Stefano and Francis, Alistair and Jacobs, Nathan and Kerner, Hannah Rae and Mackey, Lester and Mai, Gengchen and Mac Aodha, Oisin and Reichstein, Markus and Robins...
-
[81]
2026 , month = apr, url =
2026
-
[82]
, title =
Vinge, Rikard and Wittmann, Isabelle and Schneider, Jannik and Marszalek, Michael and Gilch, Luis and Brunschwiler, Thomas and Albrecht, Conrad M. , title =. Proceedings of the. 2026 , pages =
2026
-
[83]
2026 , note=
Corley, Isaac , title=. 2026 , note=
2026
-
[84]
2026 , note=
Corley, Isaac and Robinson, Caleb , title=. 2026 , note=
2026
-
[85]
Machine Learning , volume=
Random forests , author=. Machine Learning , volume=. 2001 , publisher=
2001
-
[86]
Tessellating
Cher, Daniel and Iqbal, Hamza and Xing, Eric and Wei, Brian and Jacobs, Nathan , year=. Tessellating
-
[87]
2019 , doi=
Jean, Neal and Wang, Sherrie and Samar, Anshul and Azzari, George and Lobell, David and Ermon, Stefano , booktitle=. 2019 , doi=
2019
-
[88]
Proceedings of the
Geography-aware self-supervised learning , author=. Proceedings of the. 2021 , doi=
2021
-
[89]
Stewart and Jan Dirk Wegner and Aleksis Pirinen and Olof Mogren and Konrad Schindler , title =
Ghjulia Sialelli and Robin Young and Yuchang Jiang and Cesar Aybar and Linus Scheibenreif and Damien Robert and Clemens Mosig and Adam J. Stewart and Jan Dirk Wegner and Aleksis Pirinen and Olof Mogren and Konrad Schindler , title =. 2026 , doi =
2026
-
[90]
Munir, Muhammad Akhtar and Sheikh, Muhammad Umer and Shabbir, Akashah and Khan, Muhammad Haris and Khan, Fahad and Zhu, Xiao Xiang and Demir, Beg. Agentic. 2026 , doi=
2026
-
[91]
Talemi, Niloufar Alipour and Boone, Julia and Afghah, Fatemeh , year=. Agentic
-
[92]
2026 , month = jun, url =
Anthropic , title =. 2026 , month = jun, url =
2026
Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.