Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 137 references

Anisotropic Phonon Heat Flow and Thermoelectric Response in Tetragonal GeS$_2$ and GeSe$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Tetragonal GeS2 conducts heat about 22 times better within its layers than across them, and its strongest thermoelectric response runs along the stacking direction.

desk verdict Transparent first-principles study of two new tetragonal GeX2 phases: the 22:1 anisotropy claim likely holds, but the headline zT and κ_c numbers rest on untested anharmonic-force-constant settings. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03478 v1 pith:IQATYUID submitted 2026-08-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.other

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other
keywords tetragonalGeS2latticethermalconductivityanisotropyphononBoltzmanntransportthermoelectricfigureofmeritShengBTEAMSETgermaniumdiselenidefirst-principles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that tetragonal GeS2 and GeSe2 are strongly anisotropic heat conductors, with in-plane lattice thermal conductivity far exceeding cross-plane values. For GeS2 at 300 K it predicts 26.86 W m-1 K-1 in-plane versus 1.19 W m-1 K-1 cross-plane, an anisotropy ratio near 22:1 that persists up to 800 K. The suppressed cross-plane heat flow is attributed to the layered framework of corner-sharing GeX4 tetrahedra: low-frequency phonons carry most heat in plane, while out-of-plane transport is kinematically restricted. Combining these lattice tensors with scattering-aware electronic transport gives a cross-plane figure of merit zT = 0.257 for n-type GeS2 at 800 K and 10^19 cm-3, far above its in-plane value. The paper also argues that low lattice thermal conductivity alone is not enough, since the power factor and electronic heat conduction still limit performance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the phonon Boltzmann transport equation solved by ShengBTE in the relaxation-time approximation, supplied with DFPT harmonic force constants and finite-displacement third-order force constants, which yields the anisotropic lattice thermal conductivity tensor. Electronic transport comes from AMSET with state-dependent acoustic-deformation-potential, polar-optical-phonon, and ionized-impurity scattering. The RTA lattice tensor and the AMSET electronic tensor are combined component-wise (xx paired with kappa_ab, zz with kappa_c) to produce directional zT values. The mechanism behind the low kappa_c is the layered corner-sharing GeX4 framework, where most heat-carry

What would settle it

Measure the cross-plane thermal conductivity of a single-crystal or high-quality film of tetragonal GeS2 at 300 K: if it comes out near 25 W m-1 K-1 rather than about 1 W m-1 K-1, the predicted 22:1 anisotropy collapses. Computationally, a convergence test of kappa_c against larger supercells or higher-order interlayer force constants would settle whether the seventh-nearest-neighbor truncation is adequate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that tetragonal GeS2 (and GeSe2 to a lesser extent) has a strong, persistent anisotropy in phonon heat conduction: at 300 K, GeS2 gives kappa_ab = 26.86 W m-1 K-1 and kappa_c = 1.19 W m-1 K-1, and GeSe2 gives 18.74 and 1.52 W m-1 K-1, with anisotropy ratios near 22 and 12.3 respectively. This separation is traced to the quasi-two-dimensional tetrahedral network and weak interlayer coupling, which restricts out-of-plane phonon velocities and heat-carrying modes. Because the cross-plane lattice conductivity is so small, pairing the ShengBTE RTA lattice tensor with AMSET electronic coefficients makes the cross-plane direction the best thermoelectric channel: zT_c = 0.257 fo

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that third-order interatomic forces computed from a 4x4x2 supercell truncated at the seventh-nearest-neighbor shell capture the weak interlayer coupling accurately enough that the cross-plane lattice conductivity is trustworthy, yet no convergence test or experimental benchmark for kappa_c is supplied.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the predicted anisotropy is correct, orientation control alone could reduce the relevant lattice thermal conductivity by more than a factor of 20 in tetragonal GeS2, without nanostructuring or alloying.
  • The cross-plane channel becomes the target for n-type GeS2 thermoelectric design, with a calculated zT near 0.26 at 800 K in the pristine material.
  • Se substitution lowers the in-plane conductivity and the anisotropy ratio but keeps a useful ~12:1 contrast, while shifting phonon frequencies downward.
  • Because the Lorenz number varies with carrier concentration and direction, using a fixed Wiedemann-Franz value would have misestimated the electronic contribution to heat transport.
  • The roughly T^-1 temperature dependence of kappa indicates standard crystal-like anharmonic transport, suggesting defects or alloy scattering could reduce kappa further.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer that few-layer or thin-film forms of tetragonal GeS2, with even weaker interlayer coupling than the bulk, could show an even larger cross-plane suppression, though the paper does not test this.
  • A direct testable extension is a thermal-conductivity measurement on a high-quality single crystal or oriented film: a cross-plane value near 1 W m-1 K-1 would support the third-order force-constant treatment, while a value near 25 W m-1 K-1 would invalidate it.
  • The paper's own warning that the GeSe2 zT is qualitative suggests a gap-corrected AMSET calculation could substantially change the GeSe2 numbers, and this is the most natural follow-up.
  • The small C66 shear constant hints that shear strain, not just layer sliding, may be an efficient phonon-scattering lever, but the paper does not compute strain-dependent conductivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a first-principles study of tetragonal GeS2 and GeSe2 (space group P42/nmc) combining PBE+DFT-D2 structural and electronic calculations, HSE03/Wannier band-structure references, DFPT phonons, ShengBTE lattice thermal conductivity (RTA and iterative), AMSET carrier-dependent transport, LOBSTER bonding analysis, and a component-wise zT estimate. The central quantitative claims are that GeS2 has a roughly 22:1 in-plane to cross-plane lattice thermal conductivity anisotropy (26.86 versus 1.19 W m−1 K−1 at 300 K; 10.22 versus 0.46 W m−1 K−1 at 800 K), and that n-type cross-plane GeS2 reaches zT_c = 0.257 at 800 K and 1×10^19 cm−3 because the suppressed cross-plane lattice thermal conductivity dominates the zT denominator. GeSe2, predicted in the same tetragonal structure by S-to-Se substitution, gives smaller values (zT_c = 0.066 p-type at 800 K), with the authors explicitly labeling the GeSe2 transport results as qualitative owing to the near-closure of the PBE gap. The paper also reports elastic constants, phonon dispersions, gap values, and bonding descriptors as supporting evidence.

Significance. If the quantitative results are correct, the paper identifies a strikingly anisotropic phonon-transport behavior in a relatively little-studied polymorph family and shows that the suppressed cross-plane lattice conductivity is the key factor directing the best thermoelectric response along the c-axis. The work is also useful as a first computational characterization of a hypothetical tetragonal GeSe2 phase. Strengths include the internally consistent workflow using standard, well-tested codes (Quantum ESPRESSO, ShengBTE, AMSET, Wannier90, LOBSTER), the clear disclosure of the grid-point selection for zT maxima, the explicit component-wise combination of electronic and lattice tensors, and the honest caveats about the PBE-based GeSe2 transport. The qualitative direction of the anisotropy is consistent with the layered structure and the elastic constants, so the central physics is plausible. However, the quantitative headline numbers—the anisotropy ratio and zT_c—depend on cross-plane lattice thermal conductivity, which is the least converged quantity in the calculation. No experimental benchmark or independent computational benchmark for κ_c is provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 3.1] The production Quantum ESPRESSO cell is defined by celldm(1)=6.636200 and celldm(3)=3.133016, giving c=11.002 Å, while the reference structure quoted in the Introduction and Sec. 3.1 has c=11.20 Å. The 1.8% contraction in the interlayer spacing is not tested for its effect on the cross-plane transport. Since κ_c is 20–25 times smaller than κ_ab and is governed by weak interlayer anharmonic interactions, a contraction of this size can plausibly change κ_c and therefore the headline anisotropy ratio and zT_c by a large factor. I request a convergence test over the cell (e.g., using the fully relaxed c under the same Grimme D2 correction, or computing κ_c at the experimental/reference c) and a statement of the resulting change in κ_c and zT_c.
  2. [Sec. 2.1 and SI S1] The third-order force constants used in ShengBTE were generated from 4×4×2 supercells truncated at the seventh-nearest-neighbor shell (thirdorder_espresso.py scf.in reap 4 4 2 -7) with no reported convergence test against larger supercells or longer cutoffs. Cross-plane thermal transport is especially sensitive to long-range anharmonic interlayer coupling, so the absence of a cutoff/supercell convergence test is a load-bearing gap. I ask for explicit convergence data (κ_ab, κ_c, and the ratio) for at least one larger supercell and/or one longer cutoff, or a detailed justification for why the chosen cutoff is sufficient.
  3. [Sec. 3.7 and Sec. 2.1] The headline zT_c = 0.257 for n-type GeS2 is obtained from AMSET electronic coefficients computed from PBE bands with a 0.99 eV gap and with 'placeholder weights' for orbital projections, while the HSE03/Wannier gap is 2.48 eV. The paper does not quantify how a gap-corrected electronic structure would change the carrier-density–chemical-potential mapping, mobilities, and therefore zT_c. Given that the zT maximum occurs at a relatively low carrier concentration (1×10^19 cm−3) near the band edge, this sensitivity should be assessed. If a full HSE03 AMSET calculation is too costly, a scissor-shift or constant-relaxation-time comparison at the same carrier densities would help establish robustness. The paper already labels GeSe2 as qualitative because of the PBE near-overlap, but the same issue needs to be addressed for the GeS2 headline number.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'gives azT value' should read 'gives a zT value'.
  2. [Sec. 3.1] The text says the final variable-cell relaxations gave residual pressures of −0.03 kbar for GeS2, but the production cell has c=11.002 Å, which differs from the quoted reference c=11.20 Å. Clarify whether the relaxation genuinely found this contracted c under Grimme D2, and state that the reference structure is not the one used in the transport calculations.
  3. [Sec. 3.4] The temperature dependence of κ_l is described as approximately T^{−0.97} to T^{−0.99}; state explicitly how these exponents were extracted (e.g., fit over 300–800 K) and give the corresponding R² or uncertainty.
  4. [Sec. 3.6] The text states 'IMP scattering is included in the transport tensors but not in the plotted electron–phonon lifetime.' The figure label in SI Fig. S9 only mentions ADP and POP; make the plot label consistent with the main text.
  5. [References] Reference 23, 'Gang Tse' appears to be a malformed author name; check the actual authorship of the HSE03 GeS2 study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all headline quantities are direct outputs of standard DFT/DFPT/BTE pipelines; the flagged limitations are convergence and robustness concerns, not circular reductions.

full rationale

All load-bearing quantities — the HSE03/Wannier gaps, the ShengBTE RTA lattice tensors, the AMSET electronic coefficients, and the zT values assembled from Eq. (1) — are computed outputs of standard, publicly documented codes (Quantum ESPRESSO, Wannier90, AMSET, ShengBTE, BoltzTraP2, LOBSTER) with no parameter fitted to experimental targets and no author self-citation chain. The zT combination in Sec. 3.7 is the definitional formula applied consistently to the same-state transport coefficients; the grid-maximum zT is explicitly disclosed as a sampled grid point, not an interpolated optimum or a fit. The GeSe2 structure is generated by substitution and relaxation, which is standard computational practice, not a circular prediction. The manuscript itself flags the genuinely important limitations: no convergence test is reported for the 4×4×2 / 7th-nearest-neighbor third-order force-constant cutoff (Sec. 2.1); the production GeS2 cell has c=11.002 Å, 1.8% below the quoted reference c=11.20 Å, with no sensitivity study of cross-plane transport (Secs. 1, 2.1, 3.1); AMSET inputs use approximate placeholder orbital-overlap factors (Sec. 2.1); GeSe2's PBE transport bands are close to a band-overlap limit, making its zT qualitative (Secs. 2.1 and 3.7); and the p-type GeS2 cross-plane zT=0.104 sits at the upper boundary of the sampled concentration grid (Sec. 3.7). These are numerical-robustness, validation, and benchmark-availability concerns about κ_c and hence about the anisotropy ratio and headline zT; they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs. No circular step was identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard DFT/DFPT machinery (PBE+D2, HSE03 references), a literature-based structure for GeS2 and a substituted hypothetical cell for GeSe2, third-order ShengBTE transport under RTA with no convergence tests, and PBE-derived AMSET coefficients with approximate orbital overlaps. No constants are fitted to experimental targets, and no ex nihilo physical entities are introduced; the only newly postulated object is the tetragonal GeSe2 phase itself.

free parameters (1)
  • Grimme D2 dispersion correction (s6, C6 coefficients) = code defaults (e.g., s6 = 0.75, element-specific C6/R0 from PBE-D2 tables)
    The interlayer interaction, which controls the cross-plane heat conductivity, is set by the hand-selected semi-empirical DFT-D2 correction (vdw_corr = 'grimme-d2', Sec. 2.1). A different dispersion treatment could shift the reported kappa_c values (1.19 and 1.52 W/m/K), though likely not the anisotropy direction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE + Grimme D2 gives a sufficiently accurate ground state, forces, and interlayer binding for transport predictions.
    All structural, elastic, DFPT, and transport inputs use PBE+D2 ultrasoft pseudopotentials (Sec. 2.1). No comparison with experiment or with another dispersion scheme is provided.
  • domain assumption The reference tetragonal GeS2 structure from refs. [17, 24, 25] is the relevant polymorph, and the substituted P42/nmc GeSe2 cell is a physically meaningful analogue.
    Secs. 1 and 3.1. The production GeS2 cell differs from the quoted reference by about 1.8% in c, and no experimental lattice parameters exist for tetragonal GeSe2.
  • domain assumption Third-order anharmonic perturbation theory as implemented in ShengBTE, with force constants truncated at the seventh-neighbor shell, captures lattice heat conduction; the RTA tensor is representative.
    Secs. 2.1 and 3.4. The authors use RTA for consistency, note the iterative solution gives slightly larger values, and report no convergence tests.
  • domain assumption The PBE band structure is an adequate input for AMSET scattering and transport despite the HSE03 gap being about 2.5 times larger for GeS2 and the PBE GeSe2 bands nearly overlapping.
    Secs. 2.1 and 3.6. The authors flag GeSe2 as qualitative, but the headline GeS2 zT=0.257 also uses PBE-AMSET coefficients with approximate orbital overlap factors.
  • standard math Standard self-consistent field, DFPT, and Wannier interpolation machinery (QUANTUM ESPRESSO, Wannier90, Phonopy/Phono3py verification) yields converged eigenvalues and force constants at the stated cutoffs and meshes.
    Sec. 2.1; standard numerical methodology, but unverified by any external benchmark in this paper.
invented entities (1)
  • Tetragonal P42/nmc GeSe2 polymorph obtained by S-to-Se substitution
    purpose: Serves as the structural analogue for computing anisotropic thermoelectric transport of GeSe2; all GeSe2 results (gaps, phonons, kappa, zT) refer to this hypothetical phase.
    No experimental lattice parameters exist for this phase; the paper says the geometry can serve as a first-principles reference for future studies (Sec. 3.1). The predicted band gap, phonon spectra, and kappa values are outputs of the same DFT pipeline that assumes the structure, so they are not independent evidence. Synthesis and measurement would be the falsifiable handle, but no such experiment is proposed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anisotropic Phonon Heat Flow and Thermoelectric Response in Tetragonal GeS$_2$ and GeSe$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IQATYUID

@misc{pith2026260803478,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anisotropic Phonon Heat Flow and Thermoelectric Response in Tetragonal GeS$_2$ and GeSe$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IQATYUID}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03478}
}
abstract

The electronic structure, lattice dynamics, bonding, elastic response, and anisotropic thermoelectric transport properties of tetragonal GeS$_2$ and GeSe$_2$ were investigated using density functional theory, density functional perturbation theory, Wannier interpolation, and scattering-aware Boltzmann transport. The relaxed structures are mechanically and dynamically stable within the calculated harmonic description. The HSE03/Wannier band gaps are 2.48 eV for GeS$_2$ and 1.23 eV for GeSe$_2$, while substitution of S by Se lowers the upper phonon frequency from approximately 13.6 to 10.3 THz. The phonon Boltzmann transport calculations reveal pronounced lattice-transport anisotropy. Within the relaxation-time approximation, the 300 K in-plane and cross-plane lattice thermal conductivities are 26.86 and 1.19 W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$ for GeS$_2$, and 18.74 and 1.52 W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$ for GeSe$_2$, respectively. At 800 K, these values decrease to 10.22 and 0.46 W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$ for GeS$_2$, and 7.25 and 0.58 W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$ for GeSe$_2$. Frequency-resolved analysis shows that low-frequency phonons carry most of the heat, whereas the small cross-plane values reflect restricted out-of-plane phonon transport. Combining the ShengBTE RTA lattice tensors with AMSET electronic coefficients gives $zT=0.257$ for n-type cross-plane GeS$_2$ at 800 K and $10^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$. The corresponding PBE-AMSET estimate for GeSe$_2$ is $zT=0.066$ for p-type cross-plane transport at 800 K and $3\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-3}$. LOBSTER analysis identifies mixed covalent--ionic Ge--X bonding, with Ge--S bonds having a larger stabilizing ICOHP magnitude than Ge--Se bonds ($-5.27$ versus $-4.74$ eV per bond). These results identify tetragonal GeX$_2$ compounds as strongly anisotropic thermoelectrics with moderate calculated $zT$ values whose cross-plane response benefits from suppressed lattice heat transport.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03478 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Crystal structure of tetragonal GeS2 (space group P42/nmc): (a) top view and (b) side view. Blue and yellow spheres denote Ge and S atoms, respectively; translucent polyhedra in panel (a) show GeS4 tetrahedra, and the projected unit cell is indicated in panel (b). (a) Top view (b) Side view [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Crystal structure of tetragonal GeSe2 (space group P42/nmc): (a) top view and (b) side view. Blue and green spheres denote Ge and Se atoms, respectively; translucent polyhedra in panel (a) show GeSe4 tetrahedra, and the projected unit cell is indicated in panel (b). GeX2 (X = S, Se) crystallizes in a tetragonal structure with space group P42/nmc.[24, 25] The calculations were based on the reported tetragonal GeS2 re… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. contains 18 branches, as required for the six-atom prim￾itive cell: three acoustic and 15 optical modes. No significant imaginary branch is observed along the sampled path; any tiny numerical deviation near Γ, if present, is within the interpo￾lation tolerance. The relaxed tetragonal GeS2 phase is there￾fore harmonically dynamically stable. This conclusion is com￾plementary to the elastic stability conditions becaus… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: DFPT phonon dispersion and total vibrational density of states of tetragonal GeSe2, calculated with the same path, non-analytical cor￾rection, and 40×40×20 DOS mesh used for GeS2. zone. Similar use of phonon spectra to establish stability has been reported for other tw…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: summarizes the lattice-transport quantities most di￾rectly responsible for the thermal denominator of zT.[29] In the RTA treatment, GeS2 has κab = 26.86 W m−1 K −1 and κc = 1.19 W m−1 K −1 at 300 K; these values decrease to 10.22 and 0.46 W m−1 K −1 at 800 K. GeSe2 sho…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Wannier-interpolated PBE and HSE03 band structures of tetrag￾onal GeS2 and GeSe2 along the Γ–X–M–Γ–Z–R–A–Z high-symmetry path. Panels (a) and (c) show the full dispersions, while panels (b) and (d) enlarge the corresponding band-edge regions. The y-axis in all pan￾els …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mode-resolved ShengBTE scattering descriptors at 300 K for tetragonal GeS2 and GeSe2: (a,c) absolute mode Grüneisen parameters and (b,d) phonon–phonon lifetimes from final scattering rates. The cu￾mulative conductivity, velocity, phase-space, spectral-conductivity, and…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Transport factors controlling the 800 K thermoelectric response of tetragonal GeS2: (a) power factor, (b) total thermal conductivity en￾tering the denominator of zT, (c) resulting zT, and (d) Lorenz number normalized by the Sommerfeld value L0 = 2.44×10−8 W Ω K −2 . Th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. K. Aswal, R. Singhal, and T. Venkatesan. Thermoelectric generators: A review of materials, applications and technologies. Current Science, 110: 0 52--71, 2016

  2. [2]

    Review of current high- ZT thermoelectric materials

    Jiangtao Wei, Liangliang Yang, Zhe Ma, Peishuai Song, Mingliang Zhang, Jing Ma, Fuhua Yang, and Xiaodong Wang. Review of current high- ZT thermoelectric materials. Journal of Materials Science, 55: 0 12642--12704, 2020. doi:10.1007/s10853-020-04949-0

  3. [3]

    Jian He and Terry M. Tritt. Advances in thermoelectric materials research: Looking back and moving forward. Science, 357 0 (6358): 0 eaak9997, 2017. doi:10.1126/science.aak9997

  4. [4]

    G. J. Snyder and E. S. Toberer. Complex thermoelectric materials. Nature Materials, 7: 0 105--114, 2008. doi:10.1038/nmat2090

  5. [5]

    An T. Duong, Van Quang Nguyen, Ganbat Duvjir, Vu Thanh Duong, Soonyong Kwon, Jae Yong Song, Jong Keuk Lee, Jae Eun Lee, Kyunghan Park, Jeongyong Choi, Ki-Jeong Jang, Jae-Ho Chung, and Jungdae Kim. Achieving high thermoelectric efficiency in n-type thin-film SnSe . Nature Communications, 7: 0 13713, 2016. doi:10.1038/ncomms13713

  6. [6]

    Dravid, and Mercouri G

    Li-Dong Zhao, Shih-Han Lo, Yongsheng Zhang, Hui Sun, Gangjian Tan, Ctirad Uher, Chris Wolverton, Vinayak P. Dravid, and Mercouri G. Kanatzidis. Ultralow thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric figure of merit in SnSe crystals. Nature, 508: 0 373--377, 2014. doi:10.1038/nature13184

  7. [7]

    Progress in the development of PbSe -based thermoelectric materials

    Tiejun Zhu, Ruoyu Deng, Junjie Gao, Xianli Su, and Xinfeng Tang. Progress in the development of PbSe -based thermoelectric materials. Materials Today Physics, 24: 0 100672, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100672

  8. [8]

    Kanatzidis et al

    Mercouri G. Kanatzidis et al. Lattice dislocations and phonon scattering strategies for enhancing thermoelectric performance of PbTe -based materials. Advanced Materials, 29: 0 1606768, 2017. doi:10.1002/adma.201606768

Show all 137 references
  1. [9]

    Lattice strain and dislocation engineering strategies for thermoelectric materials

    Han Wu et al. Lattice strain and dislocation engineering strategies for thermoelectric materials. Advanced Functional Materials, 29: 0 1807550, 2019. doi:10.1002/adfm.201807550

  2. [10]

    High performance thermoelectric materials and devices based on GeTe

    Suresh Perumal, Subhajit Roychowdhury, and Kanishka Biswas. High performance thermoelectric materials and devices based on GeTe . Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 7: 0 5843--5847, 2019. doi:10.1039/C9TC01044K

  3. [11]

    High thermoelectric performance by resonant dopant indium in nanostructured SnTe

    Qian Zhang, Bolin Liao, Yucheng Lan, Kevin Lukas, Weishu Liu, Keivan Esfarjani, Cyril Opeil, David Broido, Gang Chen, and Zhifeng Ren. High thermoelectric performance by resonant dopant indium in nanostructured SnTe . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 0 (33)...

  4. [12]

    Chalcogenide thermoelectrics empowered by an unconventional bonding mechanism

    Yuan Yu, Matthias Cagnoni, Oana Cojocaru-Mir \'e din, and Matthias Wuttig. Chalcogenide thermoelectrics empowered by an unconventional bonding mechanism. Advanced Functional Materials, 30: 0 1904862, 2020. doi:10.1002/adfm.201904862

  5. [13]

    Anisotropic two-dimensional materials: Fundamentals and devices

    Lin Li et al. Anisotropic two-dimensional materials: Fundamentals and devices. Advanced Materials, 33: 0 1907989, 2021. doi:10.1002/adma.201907989

  6. [14]

    Low-symmetry two-dimensional materials for polarization-sensitive photonics

    Yefei Zhao et al. Low-symmetry two-dimensional materials for polarization-sensitive photonics. Nano Research, 13: 0 123--145, 2020. doi:10.1007/s12274-019-2620-4

  7. [15]

    Symmetry breaking and anisotropy in low-symmetry two-dimensional materials

    Haifeng Du et al. Symmetry breaking and anisotropy in low-symmetry two-dimensional materials. Chemical Reviews, 121: 0 4359--4412, 2021. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00888

  8. [16]

    In-plane optical and electrical anisotropy in low-symmetry layered GeS microribbons

    Zhewei Chen, Wonjun Hwang, Moon Young Cho, Anh Tuan Hoang, Min Kim, Daehyeon Kim, Do Hyeon Kim, Yoon Dae Kim, Hyun Jae Kim, Jong-Hyun Ahn, Aloysius Soon, and Hyoung-Joon Choi. In-plane optical and electrical anisotropy in low-symmetry layered GeS microribbons. NPG Asia Materia...

  9. [17]

    Sub-angstrom characterization of the structural origin for high in-plane anisotropy in 2d GeS _2

    Xiao Wang, Jianbao Tan, Chao Han, et al. Sub-angstrom characterization of the structural origin for high in-plane anisotropy in 2d GeS _2 . ACS Nano, 14 0 (4): 0 4456--4462, 2020. doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b10057

  10. [18]

    Pavel Shafirin, Md Mehedi Hossain, and Artur R. Davoyan. Breaking refractive index records with layered van der W aals GeS _2 for blue and near-ultraviolet photonics. Light: Science & Applications, 15: 0 29, 2026. doi:10.1038/s41377-025-02070-y

  11. [19]

    Resistive switching in GaSe -based memory devices

    Xu Chen et al. Resistive switching in GaSe -based memory devices. Advanced Functional Materials, 30: 0 1909550, 2020. doi:10.1002/adfm.201909550

  12. [20]

    Weak interlayer interaction in 2D anisotropic GeSe _2

    Yusi Yang, Xia Wang, Shun-Chang Liu, Zongbao Li, Zhaoyang Sun, Chunguang Hu, Ding-Jiang Xue, Gengmin Zhang, and Jin-Song Hu. Weak interlayer interaction in 2D anisotropic GeSe _2 . Advanced Science, 6: 0 1801810, 2019. doi:10.1002/advs.201801810

  13. [21]

    First-principles investigation of adsorption behaviors and electronic, optical, and gas-sensing properties of pure and Pd -decorated GeS _2 monolayers

    Ruilin Gao, Yongliang Yong, Xiaobo Yuan, Song Hu, Qihua Hou, and Yanmin Kuang. First-principles investigation of adsorption behaviors and electronic, optical, and gas-sensing properties of pure and Pd -decorated GeS _2 monolayers. ACS Omega, 7 0 (50): 0 46440--46451, 2022. doi...

  14. [22]

    Assessing exchange--correlation functionals for band gaps of 2D materials

    Fabien Tran, Peter Blaha, et al. Assessing exchange--correlation functionals for band gaps of 2D materials. Physical Review B, 104: 0 245112, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.245112

  15. [23]

    The structural, electronic, optical, elastic, and vibrational properties of GeS _2 using HSE03 : a first-principle investigation

    Gang Tse. The structural, electronic, optical, elastic, and vibrational properties of GeS _2 using HSE03 : a first-principle investigation. Journal of Computational Electronics, 23 0 (5): 0 968--976, 2024. doi:10.1007/s10825-024-02185-8

  16. [24]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, and K. A. Persson. Materials project: Ges _2 (tetragonal, p4 _2 /nmc). https://materialsproject.org/materials/mp-1071032, 2013. Accessed 2026

  17. [25]

    Kirfel and K

    A. Kirfel and K. Eichhorn. The ges _2 (c44) structure type. https://www.atomic-scale-physics.de/lattice/struk/GeS2.html, 2016. Accessed 2026

  18. [26]

    Ganose, Junsoo Park, Alireza Faghaninia, Rachel Woods-Robinson, Kristin A

    Alex M. Ganose, Junsoo Park, Alireza Faghaninia, Rachel Woods-Robinson, Kristin A. Persson, and Anubhav Jain. Efficient calculation of carrier scattering rates from first principles. Nature Communications, 12: 0 2222, 2021. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22440-5

  19. [27]

    Phonon-limited electronic transport through first principles

    Romain Claes, Samuel Ponc \'e , Gian-Marco Rignanese, and Geoffroy Hautier. Phonon-limited electronic transport through first principles. Nature Reviews Physics, 7: 0 73--90, 2025. doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00795-0

  20. [28]

    Material insights on electronic transport of charge and heat from first principles

    Jiawei Zhou and Gang Chen. Material insights on electronic transport of charge and heat from first principles. Nature Reviews Physics, 8: 0 291--305, 2026. doi:10.1038/s42254-026-00931-y

  21. [29]

    Katcho, and Natalio Mingo

    Wu Li, Jesus Carrete, Nebil A. Katcho, and Natalio Mingo. ShengBTE : A solver of the B oltzmann transport equation for phonons. Computer Physics Communications, 185 0 (6): 0 1747--1758, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.015

  22. [30]

    Paolo Giannozzi, Stefano Baroni, Nicola Bonini, Matteo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Guido L. Chiarotti, Matteo Cococcioni, Ismaila Dabo, Andrea Dal Corso, Stefano de Gironcoli, Stefano Fabris, Guido Fratesi, Ralph Gebauer, Uwe Gerstmann, Christos Go...

  23. [31]

    Paolo Giannozzi, Oliviero Andreussi, Thomas Brumme, Oana Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, Matteo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Matteo Cococcioni, Nicola Colonna, Ivan Carnimeo, Andrea Dal Corso, Stefano de Gironcoli, Pietro Delugas, Robert A. DiStasio,...

  24. [32]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 77 0 (18): 0 3865--3868, 1996. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

  25. [33]

    Semiempirical GGA -type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction

    Stefan Grimme. Semiempirical GGA -type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 27 0 (15): 0 1787--1799, 2006. doi:10.1002/jcc.20495

  26. [34]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction ( DFT-D ) for the 94 elements H--Pu

    Stefan Grimme, Jens Antony, Stephan Ehrlich, and Helge Krieg. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction ( DFT-D ) for the 94 elements H--Pu . Journal of Chemical Physics, 132: 0 154104, 2010. doi:10.1063/1.3382344

  27. [35]

    Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu

    Andrea Dal Corso. Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu . Computational Materials Science, 95: 0 337--350, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.043

  28. [36]

    Scuseria, and Matthias Ernzerhof

    Jochen Heyd, Gustavo E. Scuseria, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Hybrid functionals based on a screened C oulomb potential. Journal of Chemical Physics, 118 0 (18): 0 8207--8215, 2003. doi:10.1063/1.1564060

  29. [37]

    Gerber, and J \'a nos G

    Joachim Paier, Martijn Marsman, Kerstin Hummer, Georg Kresse, Iann C. Gerber, and J \'a nos G. Angy \'a n. Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids. Journal of Chemical Physics, 124 0 (15): 0 154709, 2006. doi:10.1063/1.2187006

  30. [38]

    Krukau, Oleg A

    Aliaksandr V. Krukau, Oleg A. Vydrov, Artur F. Izmaylov, and Gustavo E. Scuseria. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. Journal of Chemical Physics, 125 0 (22): 0 224106, 2006. doi:10.1063/1.2404663

  31. [39]

    Maximally localized generalized W annier functions for composite energy bands

    Nicola Marzari and David Vanderbilt. Maximally localized generalized W annier functions for composite energy bands. Physical Review B, 56 0 (20): 0 12847--12865, 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.56.12847

  32. [40]

    Maximally localized W annier functions for entangled energy bands

    Ivo Souza, Nicola Marzari, and David Vanderbilt. Maximally localized W annier functions for entangled energy bands. Physical Review B, 65 0 (3): 0 035109, 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035109

  33. [41]

    Yates, Xinjie Wang, David Vanderbilt, and Ivo Souza

    Jonathan R. Yates, Xinjie Wang, David Vanderbilt, and Ivo Souza. Spectral and F ermi surface properties from W annier interpolation. Physical Review B, 75 0 (19): 0 195121, 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.195121

  34. [42]

    Mostofi, Jonathan R

    Arash A. Mostofi, Jonathan R. Yates, Young-Su Lee, Ivo Souza, David Vanderbilt, and Nicola Marzari. wannier90 : A tool for obtaining maximally-localised W annier functions. Computer Physics Communications, 178 0 (9): 0 685--699, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2007.11.016

  35. [43]

    Mustafa, Yoshiro Nohara, Yusuke Nomura, Lorenzo Paulatto, Samuel Ponc \'e , Thomas Ponweiser, Junfeng Qiao, Florian Th \"o le, Stepan S

    Giovanni Pizzi, Valerio Vitale, Ryotaro Arita, Stefan Bl \"u gel, Frank Freimuth, Guillaume G \'e ranton, Marco Gibertini, Dominik Gresch, Charles Johnson, Takashi Koretsune, Julen Iba \ n ez-Azpiroz, Hyungjun Lee, Jae-Mo Lihm, Dominik Marchand, Antimo Marrazzo, Yuriy Mokrouso...

  36. [44]

    Chevrier, Kristin A

    Shyue Ping Ong, William Davidson Richards, Anubhav Jain, Geoffroy Hautier, Michael Kocher, Shreyas Cholia, Dan Gunter, Vincent L. Chevrier, Kristin A. Persson, and Gerbrand Ceder. Python materials genomics ( pymatgen ): A robust, open-source python library for materials analys...

  37. [45]

    Georg K. H. Madsen, Jesus Carrete, and Matthieu J. Verstraete. BoltzTraP2 , a program for interpolating band structures and calculating semi-classical transport coefficients. Computer Physics Communications, 231: 0 140--145, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.010

  38. [46]

    Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory

    Stefano Baroni, Stefano de Gironcoli, Andrea Dal Corso, and Paolo Giannozzi. Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 73 0 (2): 0 515--562, 2001. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.73.515

  39. [47]

    Dynamical matrices, B orn effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation theory

    Xavier Gonze and Changyol Lee. Dynamical matrices, B orn effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation theory. Physical Review B, 55 0 (16): 0 10355--10368, 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.55.10355

  40. [48]

    First-principles phonon calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py

    Atsushi Togo. First-principles phonon calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py . Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 92 0 (1): 0 012001, 2023. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.92.012001

  41. [49]

    Implementation strategies in Phonopy and Phono3py

    Atsushi Togo, Laurent Chaput, Terumasa Tadano, and Isao Tanaka. Implementation strategies in Phonopy and Phono3py . Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 35 0 (35): 0 353001, 2023. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/acd831

  42. [50]

    Quasi-harmonic temperature dependent elastic constants: applications to silicon, aluminum, and silver, 2021

    Cristiano Malica and Andrea Dal Corso. Quasi-harmonic temperature dependent elastic constants: applications to silicon, aluminum, and silver, 2021. Implementation of elastic-constant workflows in thermo\_pw

  43. [51]

    Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems

    F \'e lix Mouhat and Fran c ois-Xavier Coudert. Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems. Physical Review B, 90: 0 224104, 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104

  44. [52]

    R. Hill. The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, 65 0 (5): 0 349--354, 1952. doi:10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307

  45. [53]

    S. F. Pugh. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Philosophical Magazine, 45 0 (367): 0 823--843, 1954. doi:10.1080/14786440808520496

  46. [54]

    Glen A. Slack. The thermal conductivity of nonmetallic crystals. In Solid State Physics, volume 34, pages 1--71. Academic Press, 1979. doi:10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60359-8

  47. [55]

    Prediction of novel ground-state structures and analysis of phonon transport in two-dimensional Ge _x S _y compounds

    Asad Ali and Young-Han Shin. Prediction of novel ground-state structures and analysis of phonon transport in two-dimensional Ge _x S _y compounds. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 26: 0 602--611, 2024. doi:10.1039/D3CP04568D

  48. [56]

    Slavich, Georgy A

    Aleksandr S. Slavich, Georgy A. Ermolaev, Ilya A. Zavidovskiy, et al. Germanium disulfide as an alternative high refractive index and transparent material for UV --visible nanophotonics. Light: Science & Applications, 14: 0 213, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41377-025-01886-y

  49. [57]

    Utkarsh Singh, Sapna Singh, Mohd Zeeshan, Jeroen van den Brink, and Hem C. Kandpal. Low lattice thermal conductivity in alkali metal based Heusler alloys. Physical Review Materials, 6: 0 125401, 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.125401

  50. [58]

    Mukter Hossain, Hasina Akter, Md

    Aslam Hossain, Md. Mukter Hossain, Hasina Akter, Md. Mohi Uddin, Md. Ashraf Ali, and Saleh Hasan Naqib. Ultralow lattice thermal conductivity with an outstanding figure of merit of predicted Zintl phases: XIn _2 C _2 ( X = Sr , Ba ). ACS Applied Energy Materials, 8 0 (8): 0 50...

  51. [59]

    Realizing intrinsically ultralow and glass-like thermal transport via chemical bonding engineering

    Zhonghao Xia, Xingchen Shen, Jun Zhou, Yuling Huang, Yali Yang, Jiangang He, and Yi Xia. Realizing intrinsically ultralow and glass-like thermal transport via chemical bonding engineering. Advanced Science, 12: 0 2417292, 2025. doi:10.1002/advs.202417292

  52. [60]

    Bl \"o chl

    Richard Dronskowski and Peter E. Bl \"o chl. Crystal orbital H amilton populations ( COHP ): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 97 0 (33): 0 8617--8624, 1993. doi:10.1021/j100135a014

  53. [61]

    Deringer, Andrei L

    Volker L. Deringer, Andrei L. Tchougr \'e eff, and Richard Dronskowski. Crystal orbital H amilton population ( COHP ) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 115 0 (21): 0 5461--5466, 2011. doi:10.1021/jp202489s

  54. [62]

    Deringer, Andrei L

    Stefan Maintz, Volker L. Deringer, Andrei L. Tchougr \'e eff, and Richard Dronskowski. LOBSTER : A tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based DFT . Journal of Computational Chemistry, 37 0 (11): 0 1030--1035, 2016. doi:10.1002/jcc.24300

  55. [63]

    Deringer, Geoffroy Hautier, and Richard Dronskowski

    Ryky Nelson, Christina Ertural, Janine George, Volker L. Deringer, Geoffroy Hautier, and Richard Dronskowski. LOBSTER : Local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional theory. Journal of Computatio...

  56. [64]

    Daniel S \'a nchez-Portal, Emilio Artacho, and Jos \'e M. Soler. Analysis of atomic-orbital basis sets from the projection of plane-wave results. Solid State Communications, 95 0 (10): 0 685--690, 1995. doi:10.1016/0038-1098(95)00341-X

  57. [65]

    teMatDb : A high-quality thermoelectric material database with self-consistent ZT filtering

    Byungki Ryu, Ji Hui Son, Sungjin Park, Jaywan Chung, Hye-Jin Lim, SuJi Park, Yujeong Do, and SuDong Park. teMatDb : A high-quality thermoelectric material database with self-consistent ZT filtering. Preprint, 2025. Version dated 2025-05-25; dataset repository: https://github.c...

  58. [66]

    Ab initio calculations of the thermoelectric figure of merit within the relaxation-time approximation

    Laurent Chaput, Henrique Miranda, Atsushi Togo, Manuel Engel, Martin Schlipf, Martijn Marsman, and Georg Kresse. Ab initio calculations of the thermoelectric figure of merit within the relaxation-time approximation. Physical Review B, 113 0 (1): 0 014313, 2026. doi:10.1103/JH7M-NNJQ

  59. [67]

    Gibbs, Yinglu Tang, Heng Wang, and G

    Hyun-Sik Kim, Zachary M. Gibbs, Yinglu Tang, Heng Wang, and G. Jeffrey Snyder. Characterization of L orenz number with S eebeck coefficient measurement. APL Materials, 3: 0 041506, 2015. doi:10.1063/1.4908244

  60. [68]

    Aswal, D. K. and Singhal, R. and Venkatesan, T. , title =. Current Science , year =

  61. [69]

    Journal of Materials Science , year =

    Wei, Jiangtao and Yang, Liangliang and Ma, Zhe and Song, Peishuai and Zhang, Mingliang and Ma, Jing and Yang, Fuhua and Wang, Xiaodong , title =. Journal of Materials Science , year =

  62. [70]

    , title =

    He, Jian and Tritt, Terry M. , title =. Science , year =

  63. [71]

    Snyder, G. J. and Toberer, E. S. , title =. Nature Materials , year =

  64. [72]

    Duong, An T. and Nguyen, Van Quang and Duvjir, Ganbat and Duong, Vu Thanh and Kwon, Soonyong and Song, Jae Yong and Lee, Jong Keuk and Lee, Jae Eun and Park, Kyunghan and Choi, Jeongyong and Jang, Ki-Jeong and Chung, Jae-Ho and Kim, Jungdae , title =. Nature Communications , year =

  65. [73]

    and Kanatzidis, Mercouri G

    Zhao, Li-Dong and Lo, Shih-Han and Zhang, Yongsheng and Sun, Hui and Tan, Gangjian and Uher, Ctirad and Wolverton, Chris and Dravid, Vinayak P. and Kanatzidis, Mercouri G. , title =. Nature , year =

  66. [74]

    Materials Today Physics , year =

    Zhu, Tiejun and Deng, Ruoyu and Gao, Junjie and Su, Xianli and Tang, Xinfeng , title =. Materials Today Physics , year =

  67. [75]

    and others , title =

    Kanatzidis, Mercouri G. and others , title =. Advanced Materials , year =

  68. [76]

    Advanced Functional Materials , year =

    Wu, Han and others , title =. Advanced Functional Materials , year =

  69. [77]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , year =

    Zhang, Qian and Liao, Bolin and Lan, Yucheng and Lukas, Kevin and Liu, Weishu and Esfarjani, Keivan and Opeil, Cyril and Broido, David and Chen, Gang and Ren, Zhifeng , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , year =

  70. [78]

    Journal of Materials Chemistry C , year =

    Perumal, Suresh and Roychowdhury, Subhajit and Biswas, Kanishka , title =. Journal of Materials Chemistry C , year =

  71. [79]

    Chalcogenide thermoelectrics empowered by an unconventional bonding mechanism , journal =

    Yu, Yuan and Cagnoni, Matthias and Cojocaru-Mir. Chalcogenide thermoelectrics empowered by an unconventional bonding mechanism , journal =. 2020 , volume =

  72. [80]

    Advanced Materials , year =

    Li, Lin and others , title =. Advanced Materials , year =

  73. [81]

    Nano Research , year =

    Zhao, Yefei and others , title =. Nano Research , year =

  74. [82]

    Chemical Reviews , year =

    Du, Haifeng and others , title =. Chemical Reviews , year =

  75. [83]

    NPG Asia Materials , year =

    Chen, Zhewei and Hwang, Wonjun and Cho, Moon Young and Hoang, Anh Tuan and Kim, Min and Kim, Daehyeon and Kim, Do Hyeon and Kim, Yoon Dae and Kim, Hyun Jae and Ahn, Jong-Hyun and Soon, Aloysius and Choi, Hyoung-Joon , title =. NPG Asia Materials , year =

  76. [84]

    Advanced Functional Materials , year =

    Chen, Xu and others , title =. Advanced Functional Materials , year =

  77. [85]

    ACS Nano , year =

    Wang, Xiao and Tan, Jianbao and Han, Chao and others , title =. ACS Nano , year =

  78. [86]

    , title =

    Shafirin, Pavel and Hossain, Md Mehedi and Davoyan, Artur R. , title =. Light: Science & Applications , year =

  79. [87]

    ACS Omega , year =

    Gao, Ruilin and Yong, Yongliang and Yuan, Xiaobo and Hu, Song and Hou, Qihua and Kuang, Yanmin , title =. ACS Omega , year =

  80. [88]

    Physical Review B , year =

    Tran, Fabien and Blaha, Peter and others , title =. Physical Review B , year =

  81. [89]

    Journal of Computational Electronics , year =

    Tse, Gang , title =. Journal of Computational Electronics , year =

  82. [90]

    and Ong, S

    Jain, A. and Ong, S. P. and Hautier, G. and Chen, W. and Richards, W. D. and Dacek, S. and Cholia, S. and Gunter, D. and Skinner, D. and Ceder, G. and Persson, K. A. , title =. 2013 , note =

  83. [91]

    and Eichhorn, K

    Kirfel, A. and Eichhorn, K. , title =. 2016 , note =

  84. [92]

    Madsen, G. K. H. and Singh, D. J. , title =. Computer Physics Communications , year =

  85. [93]

    Madsen, Georg K. H. and Carrete, Jesus and Verstraete, Matthieu J. , title =. Computer Physics Communications , year =

  86. [94]

    and Mingo, Natalio , title =

    Li, Wu and Carrete, Jesus and Katcho, Nebil A. and Mingo, Natalio , title =. Computer Physics Communications , year =

  87. [95]

    Giannozzi, Paolo and Baroni, Stefano and Bonini, Nicola and Calandra, Matteo and Car, Roberto and Cavazzoni, Carlo and Ceresoli, Davide and Chiarotti, Guido L. and Cococcioni, Matteo and Dabo, Ismaila and Dal Corso, Andrea and de Gironcoli, Stefano and Fabris, Stefano and Frat...

  88. [96]

    Giannozzi, Paolo and Andreussi, Oliviero and Brumme, Thomas and Bunau, Oana and Buongiorno Nardelli, M. and Calandra, Matteo and Car, Roberto and Cavazzoni, Carlo and Ceresoli, Davide and Cococcioni, Matteo and Colonna, Nicola and Carnimeo, Ivan and Dal Corso, Andrea and de Gi...

  89. [97]

    Computational Materials Science , year =

    Dal Corso, Andrea , title =. Computational Materials Science , year =

  90. [98]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , year =

    Baroni, Stefano and de Gironcoli, Stefano and Dal Corso, Andrea and Giannozzi, Paolo , title =. Reviews of Modern Physics , year =

  91. [99]

    Physical Review B , year =

    Gonze, Xavier and Lee, Changyol , title =. Physical Review B , year =

  92. [100]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , year =

    Togo, Atsushi , title =. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , year =

  93. [101]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , year =

    Togo, Atsushi and Chaput, Laurent and Tadano, Terumasa and Tanaka, Isao , title =. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , year =

  94. [102]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , year =

    Ali, Asad and Shin, Young-Han , title =. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , year =

  95. [103]

    and Ermolaev, Georgy A

    Slavich, Aleksandr S. and Ermolaev, Georgy A. and Zavidovskiy, Ilya A. and others , title =. Light: Science & Applications , year =

  96. [104]

    and Burke, Kieron and Ernzerhof, Matthias , title =

    Perdew, John P. and Burke, Kieron and Ernzerhof, Matthias , title =. Physical Review Letters , year =

  97. [105]

    Journal of Computational Chemistry , year =

    Grimme, Stefan , title =. Journal of Computational Chemistry , year =

  98. [106]

    Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

    Grimme, Stefan and Antony, Jens and Ehrlich, Stephan and Krieg, Helge , title =. Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

  99. [107]

    and Ernzerhof, Matthias , title =

    Heyd, Jochen and Scuseria, Gustavo E. and Ernzerhof, Matthias , title =. Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

  100. [108]

    and Angy

    Paier, Joachim and Marsman, Martijn and Hummer, Kerstin and Kresse, Georg and Gerber, Iann C. and Angy. Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids , journal =. 2006 , volume =

  101. [109]

    and Vydrov, Oleg A

    Krukau, Aliaksandr V. and Vydrov, Oleg A. and Izmaylov, Artur F. and Scuseria, Gustavo E. , title =. Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

  102. [110]

    2021 , eprint =

    Malica, Cristiano and Dal Corso, Andrea , title =. 2021 , eprint =

  103. [111]

    Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems , journal =

    Mouhat, F. Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems , journal =. 2014 , volume =

  104. [112]

    , title =

    Hill, R. , title =. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A , year =

  105. [113]

    Pugh, S. F. , title =. Philosophical Magazine , year =

  106. [114]

    , title =

    Slack, Glen A. , title =. Solid State Physics , year =

  107. [115]

    Crystal orbital

    Dronskowski, Richard and Bl. Crystal orbital. Journal of Physical Chemistry , year =

  108. [116]

    and Tchougr

    Deringer, Volker L. and Tchougr. Crystal orbital. Journal of Physical Chemistry A , year =

  109. [117]

    and Tchougr

    Maintz, Stefan and Deringer, Volker L. and Tchougr. Journal of Computational Chemistry , year =

  110. [118]

    and Hautier, Geoffroy and Dronskowski, Richard , title =

    Nelson, Ryky and Ertural, Christina and George, Janine and Deringer, Volker L. and Hautier, Geoffroy and Dronskowski, Richard , title =. Journal of Computational Chemistry , year =

  111. [119]

    Analysis of atomic-orbital basis sets from the projection of plane-wave results , journal =

    S. Analysis of atomic-orbital basis sets from the projection of plane-wave results , journal =. 1995 , volume =

  112. [120]

    Physical Review B , year =

    Marzari, Nicola and Vanderbilt, David , title =. Physical Review B , year =

  113. [121]

    Physical Review B , year =

    Souza, Ivo and Marzari, Nicola and Vanderbilt, David , title =. Physical Review B , year =

  114. [122]

    and Wang, Xinjie and Vanderbilt, David and Souza, Ivo , title =

    Yates, Jonathan R. and Wang, Xinjie and Vanderbilt, David and Souza, Ivo , title =. Physical Review B , year =

  115. [123]

    and Yates, Jonathan R

    Mostofi, Arash A. and Yates, Jonathan R. and Lee, Young-Su and Souza, Ivo and Vanderbilt, David and Marzari, Nicola , title =. Computer Physics Communications , year =

  116. [124]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , year =

    Pizzi, Giovanni and Vitale, Valerio and Arita, Ryotaro and Bl. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , year =

  117. [125]

    and Tang, Yinglu and Wang, Heng and Snyder, G

    Kim, Hyun-Sik and Gibbs, Zachary M. and Tang, Yinglu and Wang, Heng and Snyder, G. Jeffrey , title =. APL Materials , year =

  118. [126]

    Mahan, G. D. and Sofo, J. O. , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , year =

  119. [127]

    and Park, Junsoo and Faghaninia, Alireza and Woods-Robinson, Rachel and Persson, Kristin A

    Ganose, Alex M. and Park, Junsoo and Faghaninia, Alireza and Woods-Robinson, Rachel and Persson, Kristin A. and Jain, Anubhav , title =. Nature Communications , year =

  120. [128]

    and Persson, Kristin A

    Ong, Shyue Ping and Richards, William Davidson and Jain, Anubhav and Hautier, Geoffroy and Kocher, Michael and Cholia, Shreyas and Gunter, Dan and Chevrier, Vincent L. and Persson, Kristin A. and Ceder, Gerbrand , title =. Computational Materials Science , year =

  121. [129]

    Phonon-limited electronic transport through first principles , journal =

    Claes, Romain and Ponc. Phonon-limited electronic transport through first principles , journal =. 2025 , volume =

  122. [130]

    Nature Reviews Physics , year =

    Zhou, Jiawei and Chen, Gang , title =. Nature Reviews Physics , year =

  123. [131]

    Physical Review B , year =

    Chaput, Laurent and Miranda, Henrique and Togo, Atsushi and Engel, Manuel and Schlipf, Martin and Marsman, Martijn and Kresse, Georg , title =. Physical Review B , year =

  124. [132]

    Advanced Science , year =

    Xia, Zhonghao and Shen, Xingchen and Zhou, Jun and Huang, Yuling and Yang, Yali and He, Jiangang and Xia, Yi , title =. Advanced Science , year =

  125. [133]

    2025 , howpublished =

    Ryu, Byungki and Son, Ji Hui and Park, Sungjin and Chung, Jaywan and Lim, Hye-Jin and Park, SuJi and Do, Yujeong and Park, SuDong , title =. 2025 , howpublished =

  126. [134]

    , title =

    Singh, Utkarsh and Singh, Sapna and Zeeshan, Mohd and van den Brink, Jeroen and Kandpal, Hem C. , title =. Physical Review Materials , year =

  127. [135]

    Mukter and Akter, Hasina and Uddin, Md

    Hossain, Aslam and Hossain, Md. Mukter and Akter, Hasina and Uddin, Md. Mohi and Ali, Md. Ashraf and Naqib, Saleh Hasan , title =. ACS Applied Energy Materials , year =

  128. [136]

    Advanced Science , year =

    Yang, Yusi and Wang, Xia and Liu, Shun-Chang and Li, Zongbao and Sun, Zhaoyang and Hu, Chunguang and Xue, Ding-Jiang and Zhang, Gengmin and Hu, Jin-Song , title =. Advanced Science , year =

  129. [137]

    G. D. Mahan and J. O. Sofo, ``The best thermoelectric,'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(15), 7436--7439 (1996). doi:10.1073/pnas.93.15.7436 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7436

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.