Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 300 references

Heterogeneous land-manager populations, built from survey-based behavioural types, slow modelled land-use transitions and favour medium-intensity management over the rational-choice baseline.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Putting survey-based behavioural heterogeneity into an agent-based land-use model dampens synchronized responses and increases medium-intensity management, but type behaviour depends strongly on population context.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful proof of concept for embedding empirical behaviour typologies in ABMs, but the headline claim about heterogeneity is confounded with behavioural friction and needs a proper control. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.03784 v1 pith:2ECMPJL5 submitted 2026-08-04 cs.CE

Empirical behavioural heterogeneity shapes the dynamics of an agent-based land use model

Ronja Hotz , Thomas Schmitt , Calum Brown , Yongchao Zeng , Mark Rounsevell This is my paper
classification cs.CE
keywords agent-based modelland usedecision-makingbehavioural heterogeneitytypologyecosystem servicesforestry practitionerssocial norms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that how a land-use model's agents differ psychologically matters for what the model predicts. It takes an empirical typology of European forestry practitioners - five types built from survey beliefs about the environment, income, social norms, and markets - translates the types into cognitive parameters of an agent-based model, and runs the model on a stylised landscape under different ecosystem-service demand scenarios. The central claim is that replacing the standard homogeneous rational-choice agent with empirically distributed heterogeneous types damps synchronised switching, slows the system's response to demand change, and raises the prevalence of medium-intensity management, which is the most common practice in the survey data. The paper further claims that the same aggregate outcome can emerge through different psychological mechanisms, and that a given type behaves differently depending on the population it sits in, so attitude-based types are not fixed predictors of land-use behaviour. If true, this matters because large-scale land-use and climate models that assume homogeneous rational actors may systematically overpredict rapid, coordinated land-use change and miss the emergence of multifunctional, medium-intensity landscapes.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that behavioural heterogeneity is a first-order driver of land-use dynamics, not a refinement. Relative to a homogeneous rational-choice baseline, populations parameterised with the empirically observed mix of five forestry practitioner types respond to changing ecosystem service demand more slowly and less in unison: giving-in thresholds differ across types, so switching decisions are staggered rather than synchronous, aggregate oscillations are damped, and the landscape settles more often into medium-intensity management that supplies both material and non-material services. This holds across two sharply different regional compositions, but throug

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is a dynamic 'giving-in threshold' computed from three socio-psychological components - environmental attitude (a signed bias toward extensification or intensification), descriptive social norm (peer influence weighted against attitude), and behavioural inertia (resistance proportional to the size of the intended change) - aggregated into a behavioural influence score and passed through a logistic function. In the host CRAFTY competition framework, a change of management intensity happens only when the utility advantage of a competing practice exceeds this threshold. Empirically derived practitioner types are simply distinct parameter combinations in t

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the hand-assigned parameter values of Table 1 - produced by a 'structured interpretative translation' of ordinal survey indicators and qualitative narratives (Section 2.4) - faithfully operationalise the five behavioural types; if those numbers are arbitrary, every composition difference in the experiments is a difference in arbitrary parameters and the qualitative results may not transfer to real populations.

What would settle it

Re-parameterise the five types by statistically estimating the cognitive parameters from the underlying survey items (or from a fresh elicitation study) and rerun the same demand scenarios: if dampened synchrony and elevated medium-intensity shares disappear, the central claim is an artefact of the chosen numbers rather than of heterogeneity per se. Alternatively, fit both the rational baseline and the heterogeneous configurations to real land-use transition time series from the surveyed regions - the claim predicts heterogeneous populations track gradual empirical transitions better, so a lon

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Land-use and integrated assessment models that keep the homogeneous rational-agent assumption will keep overpredicting abrupt, coordinated land-use shifts; adding behavioural diversity is a structural fix, not a calibration detail.
  • Medium-intensity, multifunctional land management can emerge from heterogeneity alone and should not be modelled as an inefficient compromise; land-sharing policies gain a mechanistic basis.
  • Because the same land-use pattern can come from norm-following or from inertia, observed landscapes do not reveal their own adaptability; governance must know the behavioural composition, not just the map.
  • Empirical attitude surveys cannot be plugged into models as direct predictors of practice - the same type extensifies, intensifies, or conserves depending on demand scenario and population context, so models must separate intentions from realised behaviour.
  • Policy instruments should be matched to behavioural composition: peer-learning and demonstration policies fit norm-sensitive populations, while inertia-dominated populations need longer-term incentives or structural support.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dampening result is probably not specific to psychology: any diversity in agent thresholds - discount rates, information access, risk perception, technology adoption costs - should stagger switching and stabilise aggregate dynamics, so the paper's mechanism generalises beyond the particular typology.
  • Reversing the comparison, the model offers a way to infer latent behavioural composition from dynamics: since compositions leave distinguishable signatures in transition rates, timing, and spatial clustering, fitting such models to land-use time series could estimate type shares where surveys are absent.
  • A testable extension the paper leaves open (flagged as a limitation in its Section 4.3): clustering same-type agents spatially should strengthen norm-driven lock-in, so the smoothing result may be weaker under realistic spatial sorting - this could be checked by rerunning the experiments with spatially correlated type assignment.
  • The paper implies a falsifiable prediction about real policy: in regions dominated by norm-responsive practitioner types, information-based interventions should change behaviour measurably faster than in inertia-dominated regions; a natural experiment comparing uptake of the same programme across the two surveyed regions could test it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper integrates an empirical typology of European forestry practitioners into an agent-based land use model (CRAFTY) by translating five survey-derived behavioural profiles into cognitive parameters (environmental attitude, social norm weight, giving-in threshold, behavioural inertia). Simulations on a stylised 101x101 landscape compare region-specific heterogeneous behavioural compositions (Northern Europe, Southwest Europe), single-type populations, and a homogeneous rational-choice baseline under three ecosystem service demand scenarios. The main claims are that, relative to the rational baseline, heterogeneous behavioural compositions dampen synchronised land-use responses, increase the prevalence of medium-intensity management, and better reflect empirical land use patterns; and that individual behavioural types are strongly context-dependent, so that types do not map onto fixed management practices.

Significance. If the central claim is supported, the paper makes a useful contribution to socio-ecological modelling: it separates decision-making types from management AFTs, offers a proof of concept for using survey-derived typologies in ABLUMs, and documents the model and its interpretative parameterization. The reported context-dependence of behavioural types is a thoughtful and non-obvious result. However, the headline claim that heterogeneity is the causal driver of the dampened dynamics is not isolated by the current experimental design, and the empirical grounding of the 'better reflect empirical patterns' statement is qualitative. These gaps are fixable within the manuscript's scope, so a major revision is appropriate.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.5.2, Table 1, §4.1.1] The comparison underlying the title claim is confounded. The rational-choice baseline omits the behavioural extension entirely, whereas all heterogeneous runs include non-zero thresholds, norm weights, attitudes, and inertia. No experiment uses a homogeneous population with the population-weighted average (L, w, A, lambda) of the North or Southwest composition. Therefore the observed damping and higher medium-intensity share could be caused entirely by the presence of socio-psychological friction rather than by variation across agents. The mechanism statement in §4.1.1 ('differences in giving-in thresholds... prevent all agents from changing management simultaneously') specifically attributes the effect to heterogeneity, but this is not tested. Please add homogeneous-average controls for both regional compositions, or otherwise explicitly separate the effects of heterogeneity from the ef
  2. [§2.4, Table 1, Appendix C, Table A1] The numeric parameter values are assigned by a structured interpretative translation of ordinal survey indicators, not estimated. The paper acknowledges this in §2.4 and §4.2, but no sensitivity analysis over these values is reported. Given that the empirical typology provides only relative qualitative information, the robustness of the qualitative findings to the discrete level choices (e.g., L=0.8 vs 0.75, w=0.5 vs 0.25) and to the global parameters in Table A1 (critical mass threshold, logistic steepness, neighbourhood radius) is load-bearing for the 'empirically informed' claim. Please add a sensitivity analysis (at minimum one-way perturbations of each type's parameters to adjacent discrete levels, and of the global behavioural parameters) and state whether the damping and medium-intensity results persist.
  3. [§4.1.2, abstract] The claim that heterogeneous populations 'better reflect empirical land use patterns' is not supported by a formal comparison. The empirical benchmark cited in §4.1.2 — that most surveyed practitioners used medium-intensity strategies — comes from the same Feliciano et al. survey that defines the typology and parameterisation used in the model. The model is not fitted to, nor statistically compared against, independent observed land use patterns. This is not circular in the sense of the model output being used to set parameters, but it is a qualitative consistency argument, not a validation. Please either temper the wording to 'consistent with' the survey distribution, or add an independent empirical benchmark with a quantitative fit metric.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4] Typo: 'stylsied' should be 'stylised'.
  2. [Table 1] The row labels for behavioural types appear garbled in the rendered text (e.g., 'ὬF♂leaf', '/tools♂leaf'). Please ensure the table is formatted correctly.
  3. [§4.3] The scope statement in §4.3 ('results should be understood as theoretical insights... rather than as applied predictions') is appropriate, but it sits somewhat uneasily with the stronger wording in the abstract. Consider aligning the abstract with this scoped interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the claimed dynamics are emergent from interpretatively translated external typology parameters; the same-survey benchmark and the missing homogeneous-with-behaviour control are limitations, not constructed equivalences.

full rationale

The paper does not fit its outputs to the empirical medium-intensity benchmark. The behavioural parameters (L, w, A, lambda) in Table 1 are assigned through an explicitly interpretative translation of survey belief indicators (Section 2.4 and Appendix C), not by calibration or regression against the prevalence of medium-intensity management. The simulation outcomes emerge from the specified CRAFTY competition and giving-in-threshold dynamics, and the comparison to the empirical pattern in Section 4.1.2 is a consistency check rather than a fitted target. The self-citation to Hotz et al. (2026) supplies the behavioural layer, but it is not used as a uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for the experiments; the impacts of the parameterised populations are reported from the simulations themselves. The absence of a homogeneous population with the population-weighted average behavioural parameters means the headline attribution to heterogeneity is confounded with the presence of socio-psychological friction, and the use of the same survey for both parametrisation and the empirical benchmark is a limitation. However, neither issue makes the claimed result equivalent to its inputs by construction, so no circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities. Its free parameters are the hand-assigned cognitive parameters and global simulation constants. The load-bearing axioms are the psychological theory, the threshold mechanism in CRAFTY, the spatial network assumption, and the random spatial assignment of types.

free parameters (4)
  • Behavioural-type parameter tuples (Lα, wα, Aα, λα) = ECP (1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.25); EI (0.75, 0, 0.75, 0); Trad (0.8, 0.5, 0.5, 0.25); Max (0.25, 0.1, -1, 0); SS (0.6, 0.75, 0, 0
    Chosen by interpretive translation of ordinal survey indicators in Table A2, not statistically estimated. The central simulation contrasts all depend on these values.
  • Critical mass threshold = 0.5
    Global social-norm trigger in Table A1. No sensitivity analysis is reported for this value.
  • Logistic steepness = 10
    Controls sharpness of the behavioural response threshold in Table A1. No sensitivity analysis is reported.
  • Neighbourhood radius = 2
    Spatial scope of social norm calculation in Table A1. This choice shapes the spatial clustering results.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Theory of Planned Behaviour adequately captures land manager decision-making via attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioural control.
    Section 2.2 frames the entire behavioural layer through TPB without testing alternative decision theories.
  • domain assumption The CRAFTY giving-in threshold can represent socio-psychological barriers to changing management intensity.
    Section 2.3 links behavioural scores to the CRAFTY competition mechanism; the validity of this mapping is assumed.
  • domain assumption Descriptive social norms operate only through local spatial neighbourhoods with radius 2 and no long-distance ties.
    Table A1 sets teleconnections to 0 and neighbourhood radius to 2; real social networks may differ substantially.
  • domain assumption Behavioural types are assigned randomly across the landscape, independent of capitals and management practices.
    Section 2.5.1 and the Discussion acknowledge that real spatial clustering of types is not represented.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Empirical behavioural heterogeneity shapes the dynamics of an agent-based land use model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ECMPJL5

@misc{pith2026260803784,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Empirical behavioural heterogeneity shapes the dynamics of an agent-based land use model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ECMPJL5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03784}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Land use models often represent decision-makers as homogeneous and rational, overlooking socio-psychological diversity and potentially generating rapid, coordinated land use responses that contrast with observed land use patterns. Here, we integrate an empirical typology of European forestry practitioners into an agent-based land use model by translating survey-based behavioural profiles into cognitive parameters governing endogenous decision-making processes. We distinguish five practitioner types and parametrise heterogeneous agent populations according to the empirically observed distribution of these types. Using a stylised model landscape, we compare these heterogeneous populations against a homogeneous rational-choice baseline and single-type populations. Compared with the homogeneous rational-choice baseline, heterogeneous populations dampen synchronised responses to changing ecosystem service demand, producing more gradual land use dynamics and a higher prevalence of medium intensity management, that better reflect empirical land use patterns. Our experiments reveal that similar land use patterns can emerge through different behavioural mechanisms, while the behaviour of individual decision-making types depends strongly on the population context in which they are embedded. Together, these two findings show that individual behavioural responses and land use outcomes co-evolve rather than decision-making types mapping onto fixed management practices. Explicitly representing socio-psychological diversity can therefore improve the realism and policy-relevance of agent-based land-use models by capturing feedbacks between cognition, social interactions, and emergent land use dynamics. Empirical data may make this representation possible, but models can also use this capability to explore behavioural heterogeneity as a key source of uncertainty when data are absent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03784 by Calum Brown, Mark Rounsevell, Ronja Hotz, Thomas Schmitt, Yongchao Zeng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Aggregate land management intensity shares under different ecosystem service [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Aggregate ecosystem service provision under different ecosystem service demand [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of land-use maps at the final time step for different behavioural [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mean context sensitivity of behavioural types across ecosystem service demand [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Selected behavioural-type dynamics under contrasting ecosystem service de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Contributions of behavioural types to aggregate land management intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Material and non-material ecosystem service provision per agent by behavioural [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 155 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Decision rules, parameters, and narratives for modelling , shorttitle =

    Diana Feliciano and Florencia Franzini and Mart-Jan Schelhaas and Emmi Haltia and Valentina Bacciu and Silvester Boonen and Sara Filipek and Liina Häyrinen and Marcus Lindner and Alessio Menini and Mats Nieberg and Chidiebere Ofoegbu and Mikko Peltoniemi and Tudor Stancioiu and Igor Staritsky and Sara Uzquiano and Hinke Wiersma , year =. Decision rules, p...

  2. [2]

    People and Nature , author =

    How can social–ecological system models simulate the emergence of social–ecological crises? , volume =. People and Nature , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/pan3.10167 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/pan3.10167 2021

  3. [3]

    Silva Fennica , author =

    Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners; theoretical modelling and qualitative assessment , volume =. Silva Fennica , author =. doi:10.14214/sf.430 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.14214/sf.430

  4. [4]

    One Earth , author =

    Toward quantification of the feasible potential of land-based carbon dioxide removal , volume =. One Earth , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.11.011 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.11.011 2023

  5. [5]

    Nature Sustainability , author =

    Unprecedented rates of land-use transformation in modelled climate change mitigation pathways , volume =. Nature Sustainability , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0063-7 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0063-7 2018

  6. [6]

    Land Use Policy , author =

    What motivates. Land Use Policy , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108105 , abstract =

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Land Use Policy , author =

    Cognition behind land transactions:. Land Use Policy , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108127 , abstract =

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Annual Review of Resource Economics , author =

    The. Annual Review of Resource Economics , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-030314 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-030314 2020

  9. [9]

    Agent-based Integrated Assessment Models: Alternative Foundations to the Environment-Energy-Economics Nexus

    Naumann-Woleske, Karl , month = jan, year =. Agent-based. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2301.08135 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.08135

  10. [10]

    Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the

    IPBES , month = mar, year =. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the

  11. [11]

    Nature , author =

    A safe operating space for humanity , volume =. Nature , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1038/461472a , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/461472a 2009

  12. [12]

    Environmental Research Letters , author =

    Local land-use decision-making in a global context , volume =. Environmental Research Letters , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab309e , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab309e 2019

  13. [13]

    Forest Policy and Economics , author =

    European private forest owner typologies:. Forest Policy and Economics , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010 2019

  14. [14]

    and Page, Scott E

    Miller, John H. and Page, Scott E. , month = nov, year =. Complex

  15. [15]

    International Journal of Agricultural Extension , author =

    Enabling learning in demonstration farms: a literature review , volume =. International Journal of Agricultural Extension , author =. 2018 , pages =

    2018

  16. [16]

    Conservation Letters , author =

    Land. Conservation Letters , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1111/conl.12084 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/conl.12084 2014

  17. [17]

    WIREs Climate Change , author =

    Behavioral models of climate change adaptation and mitigation in land-based sectors , volume =. WIREs Climate Change , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1002/wcc.448 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/wcc.448 2017

  18. [18]

    Nature Climate Change , author =

    Global models of human decision-making for land-based mitigation and adaptation assessment , volume =. Nature Climate Change , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nclimate2250 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/nclimate2250 2014

  19. [19]

    Ajzen, Icek , editor =. From. Action. 1985 , doi =

    1985

  20. [20]

    Frontiers in Psychology , author =

    Designing. Frontiers in Psychology , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01874 , abstract =

    arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Ecological Economics , author =

    Social. Ecological Economics , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017 2017

  22. [22]

    Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , author =

    The influence of demonstration sites and field days on adoption of conservation practices , volume =. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.2489/jswc.73.3.276 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.2489/jswc.73.3.276 2018

  23. [23]

    Behavioural Public Policy , author =

    How social norms are often a barrier to addressing climate change but can be part of the solution , volume =. Behavioural Public Policy , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.42 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.42 2021

  24. [24]

    Biodiversity and Conservation , author =

    Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services , volume =. Biodiversity and Conservation , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2 , abstract =

    doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2 2017

  25. [25]

    Landscape Ecology , author =

    Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications , volume =. Landscape Ecology , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1 2007

  26. [26]

    Crop Protection , author =

    Assessment of policy instruments for pesticide use reduction in. Crop Protection , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104929 , abstract =

    arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Policy Sciences , author =

    Policy learning as complex contagion: how social networks shape organizational beliefs in forest-based climate change mitigation , volume =. Policy Sciences , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s11077-021-09418-2 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11077-021-09418-2 2021

  28. [28]

    Behavioural Public Policy , author =

    Cultural evolutionary behavioural science in public policy , volume =. Behavioural Public Policy , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1017/bpp.2022.40 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1017/bpp.2022.40 2025

  29. [29]

    Nature Sustainability , author =

    A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes , volume =. Nature Sustainability , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y 2020

  30. [30]

    Land , author =

    A. Land , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.3390/land12040756 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3390/land12040756 2023

  31. [31]

    Energy Research & Social Science , author =

    (. Energy Research & Social Science , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102781 , abstract =

    arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Environmental Modelling & Software , author =

    Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems:. Environmental Modelling & Software , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.017 , abstract =

    doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.017 2013

  33. [33]

    Population synthesis with geographic coordinates , copyright =

    Lenti, Jacopo and Costantini, Lorenzo and Fosch, Ariadna and Monticelli, Anna and Scala, David and Pangallo, Marco , year =. Population synthesis with geographic coordinates , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2510.09669 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.09669

  34. [34]

    Scientific Data , author =

    A. Scientific Data , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03970-1 , language =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03970-1 2024

  35. [35]

    Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , author =

    The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning , volume =. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.02.006 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.02.006 2015

  36. [36]

    Ambio , author =

    Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in. Ambio , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01190-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01190-1 2020

  37. [37]

    Biological Conservation , author =

    Continuous cover forestry is a cost-efficient tool to increase multifunctionality of boreal production forests in. Biological Conservation , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018 2018

  38. [38]

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , author =

    Reframing the land‐sparing/land‐sharing debate for biodiversity conservation , volume =. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1111/nyas.12845 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/nyas.12845 2015

  39. [39]

    Science , author =

    Farming and the. Science , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1106049 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1106049 2005

  40. [40]

    Global Change Biology , author =

    Land‐sharing versus land‐sparing logging: reconciling timber extraction with biodiversity conservation , volume =. Global Change Biology , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1111/gcb.12353 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/gcb.12353 2014

  41. [41]

    Science , author =

    Reconciling. Science , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1208742 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1208742 2011

  42. [42]

    Modelling

    Hotz, Ronja and Brown, Calum and Zeng, Yongchao and Schmitt, Thomas and Rounsevell, Mark , month = feb, year =. Modelling. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.02347 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.02347

  43. [43]

    EGUsphere , author =

    From. EGUsphere , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-4079 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-4079 2025

  44. [44]

    Simulating multiple human perspectives in socio-ecological systems using large language models

    Zeng, Yongchao and Brown, Calum and Kyriakou, Ioannis and Hotz, Ronja and Rounsevell, Mark , month = jul, year =. Simulating multiple human perspectives in socio-ecological systems using large language models , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.17680 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.17680

  45. [45]

    Environmental Modelling & Software , author =

    Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models –. Environmental Modelling & Software , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.008 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.008 2017

  46. [46]

    One Earth , author =

    Meta-analyses reveal the importance of socio-psychological factors for farmers’ adoption of sustainable agricultural practices , volume =. One Earth , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.10.028 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.10.028 2023

  47. [47]

    Environmental Modelling & Software , author =

    Combining agent functional types, capitals and services to model land use dynamics , volume =. Environmental Modelling & Software , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.019 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.019 2014

  48. [48]

    Predicting and

    Fishbein, Martin and Ajzen, Icek , year =. Predicting and

  49. [49]

    Regional Environmental Change , author =

    Improving the representation of adaptation in climate change impact models , volume =. Regional Environmental Change , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1328-4 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1328-4 2018

  50. [50]

    Environmental Development , author =

    Impact of land use change on ecosystem services:. Environmental Development , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100527 , abstract =

    arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , isbn =

  52. [52]

    Environmental Modelling & Software , author =

    Modelling forests as social-ecological systems:. Environmental Modelling & Software , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105998 , abstract =

    arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Ecological Modelling , author =

    Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems:. Ecological Modelling , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010 , abstract =

    doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010 2012

  54. [54]

    Global Environmental Change , author =

    Coupling human and natural systems:. Global Environmental Change , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.003 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.003 2015

  55. [55]

    Forest Policy and Economics , author =

    Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry:. Forest Policy and Economics , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.007 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.007 2010

  56. [56]

    Ambio , author =

    Conservation perspectives of small-scale private forest owners in. Ambio , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01615-w , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01615-w 2022

  57. [57]

    European Journal of Forest Research , author =

    Small-scale private forest owners and the. European Journal of Forest Research , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10342-021-01415-7 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10342-021-01415-7 2021

  58. [58]

    Human Ecology , author =

    The. Human Ecology , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10745-013-9612-x , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10745-013-9612-x 2013

  59. [59]

    Journal of Environmental Management , author =

    Refining perception-based farmer typologies with the analysis of past census data , volume =. Journal of Environmental Management , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.020 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.020 2012

  60. [60]

    Forest Policy and Economics , month = jun, year =

    Barking up the wrong tree? -. Forest Policy and Economics , month = jun, year =. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103208 , abstract =

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Global Environmental Change , author =

    Mapping global patterns of land use decision-making , volume =. Global Environmental Change , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102170 , abstract =

    arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Wilensky, Uri , year =

  63. [63]

    Gary Polhill, Dawn Parker , month = mar, year =

    J. Gary Polhill, Dawn Parker , month = mar, year =. Using the

  64. [64]

    Ecological Modelling , author =

    A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , volume =. Ecological Modelling , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023 , abstract =

    doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023 2006

  65. [65]

    , year =

    Rogers, Everett M. , year =. Diffusion of innovations , isbn =

  66. [66]

    Science , author =

    Global. Science , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1111772 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1111772 2005

  67. [67]

    Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation , author =

    Land-. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.18564/jasss.4211 , number =

    work page doi:10.18564/jasss.4211 2020

  68. [68]

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , author =

    A focus theory of normative conduct:. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , author =. 1990 , pages =. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 , abstract =

    doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 1990

  69. [69]

    German Journal of Agricultural Economics , author =

    Factors affecting. German Journal of Agricultural Economics , author =. doi:10.52825/gjae.v62i4.1925 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.52825/gjae.v62i4.1925 1925

  70. [70]

    Journal of Agricultural Economics , author =

    Farmers' adoption of ecological practices:. Journal of Agricultural Economics , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12545 , abstract =

    arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Key factors influencing forest practitioners’ decisions , url =

    Franzini, Florencia and Diana Feliciano, Diana and Menini, Alessio and Stancioiu, Tudor and Wiersma, Hinke and Liina Häyrinen, Liina and Schelhaas, Mart-Jan and Lovrić, Marko and Ofoegbu, Chidiebere , month = dec, year =. Key factors influencing forest practitioners’ decisions , url =

  72. [72]

    Ecological Economics , author =

    Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality , volume =. Ecological Economics , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014 2015

  73. [73]

    Ecological Economics , author =

    Simulating the diffusion of organic farming practices in two. Ecological Economics , author =. 2009 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.001 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.001 2009

  74. [74]

    Ecology and Society , author =

    Agriculture production as a major driver of the. Ecology and Society , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.5751/ES-09595-220408 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.5751/es-09595-220408 2017

  75. [75]

    Science , author =

    Pervasive human-driven decline of life on. Science , author =. 2019 , pmid =. doi:10.1126/science.aax3100 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aax3100 2019

  76. [76]

    Bicchieri, Cristina , month = dec, year =. The

  77. [77]

    Norms in the

    Bicchieri, Cristina , month = dec, year =. Norms in the

  78. [78]

    NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences , author =

    Identifying socio-psychological constructs and beliefs underlying farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos , volume =. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2020.100322 , abstract =

    arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    Nature , author =

    Safe and just. Nature , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 2023

  80. [80]

    Nature , author =

    Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , volume =. Nature , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1038/30918 , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/30918 1998

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.