Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 58 references

An optical-fibre-integrated buffer for packet-switched quantum networks

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper demonstrates an all-fibre quantum buffer that stores a 16-pulse polarization-encoded qubit payload for up to 47 microseconds, reads the packet header while the payload is stored, and retrieves the payload with 1.85% average QBER.

desk verdict A genuinely new all-fibre packet buffer, honestly reported; the QBER numbers rely on active polarization correction, so conditional accept is the right call. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04093 v1 pith:TISNUYBN submitted 2026-08-04 quant-ph physics.optics

Daniel Spegel-Lexne , Joakim Argillander , Martin Clason , {AA}sa Claesson , Kenny Hey Tow , Gustavo Lima , João M. B. Pereira , Guilherme B. Xavier This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics PACS 03.67.Hk42.50.Ex42.79.Sz
keywords quantumnetworkspacketswitchingopticalfibrebufferrecirculatinglooppoledphasemodulatorpolarisationqubitsSagnacinterferometertelecom-bandmemory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Packet-switched quantum networks need buffers that delay a payload of quantum states while routing information is processed; the paper shows that such a buffer can be built entirely in optical fibre. The key device is an ultra-low-loss poled-fibre phase modulator, which makes it possible to switch, store, and retrieve a polarization-encoded qubit payload in a recirculating Sagnac loop, and to split a classical header from the payload inside the buffer. The experiment stores a 16-pulse weak-coherent payload for up to 47 microseconds (eight storage cycles) with about 56% efficiency per cycle and an average quantum bit error rate of 1.85%, and it demonstrates stable operation for over twelve hours. If these results are correct, they point to a practical, telecom-compatible buffering component for future quantum network nodes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the poled-fibre phase modulator: a single-mode silica fibre with two bismuth-filled microchannels that, after poling, induces a π phase shift for a 950 V pulse, with only 0.4 dB loss and 22–26 ns response. It sits inside a fibre Sagnac interferometer that works as a polarization-insensitive optical switch: at zero relative phase a packet remains in the loop, at π it is routed into a storage line made of a 100 m fibre spool and a fibre Bragg grating mirror. Two driving pulses on the modulator, separated by a chosen delay, inject and then retrieve the packet; adjusting that delay sets the number of storage cycles, so the storage time is controlled by the header. A manual polarisation controller per cycle cancels accumulated birefringence, and a voltage-operated polarisation controller (VOPC) automatically realigns the state to the measurement PBS when the detected QBER exceeds 5%, enabling the long stability run.

What would settle it

Measure the QBER of a fixed input state over several storage cycles with no polarisation controller adjustment and with integration times much shorter than 30 seconds; if the QBER rises above the reported 1.85% average as the integration window shrinks, then the quoted error rate is an average over a drifting polarisation rather than an intrinsic property of the stored qubit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a fully fibre-integrated recirculating buffer can store and retrieve polarization-encoded qubit packets while performing header readout, a capability not previously shown in fibre. The authors demonstrate storage of a 16-pulse payload at 0.1 photons per pulse, retrieval after one to eight cycles (the longest being 47 μs), and fast in-buffer separation of a three-pulse classical header from the delayed payload. They report per-cycle efficiency of about 56%—compared with the roughly 50% per-pass loss expected from a commercial LiNbO3 modulator—and an average QBER of 1.85% over the four BB84 states and all storage cycles, leading to an effective qubit yield of approximately nine recovered qubits per storage event. The buffer works at 1546.9 nm and maintains stable QBER (below a 5% threshold with automatic VOPC recalibration) over more than twelve hours, supporting the claim that it can operate as a practical network-layer primitive.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the residual polarisation change per storage cycle being unitary, reciprocal, and stable over each 30-second data run, so that one manual polarisation controller per cycle can fully undo it and the final polarising beam splitter measures the prepared qubit without bias.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A fully fibre-integrated buffer can be spliced directly into existing telecom links, since it needs no free-space optics, cryogenic cooling, or wavelength conversion.
  • A network node can read a packet's header and set the payload's delay on the fly, which allows collision avoidance and time-slot assignment in a star-topology quantum switch.
  • Replacing four FC/PC connectors inside the Sagnac loop with splices and using a lower-excess-loss coupler would raise per-cycle transmissivity to roughly 72%, extending the storage-time range of the same architecture.
  • Because the buffer is designed for entire packets, the payload density can be increased by using narrower, more closely spaced pulses (for example, 45 ps pulses with 400 ps separation) without altering the storage mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same poled-fibre modulator, with its low loss and nanosecond-scale switching, could be applied to high-speed basis selection or measurement-setting randomisation in device-independent quantum communication; the paper mentions this only as a future direction.
  • If the manual polarisation controllers were replaced by fast, actively tracked compensation inside the loop, the buffer could accept arbitrary incoming polarisation states without reconfiguration, a step the paper does not claim but that would be needed for field deployment.
  • The qubit-yield comparison in the paper suggests a design trade-off: this loop buffer maximises recovered qubits for short delays, whereas matter memories provide longer and on-demand storage; a hybrid node combining both would likely be needed for full quantum-network functionality, something the paper does not discuss.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an all-fibre optical buffer for packet-switched quantum networks, built from a Sagnac-loop switch controlled by a poled-fibre phase modulator and a 100 m storage line terminated by a fibre Bragg grating. It demonstrates storage and retrieval of 16-pulse weak-coherent polarization-encoded payloads for up to eight recirculations (47 μs), with a per-cycle efficiency of about 56%, cycle-resolved quantum bit error rates between 1.06% and 2.74% (average 1.85%), header-controlled retrieval time, and a 12-hour stability run under active polarization realignment. The central claim is that this establishes the first fully fibre-integrated buffer capable of packet-level processing for quantum networks.

Significance. If the fidelity claims hold, this is a useful step forward: it moves recirculating-buffer demonstrations from bulk-optical implementations to a fully fibre-integrated, telecom-compatible platform and introduces poled-fibre phase modulators as low-loss, polarization-insensitive switches for quantum information processing. The paper has several concrete quantitative strengths: a transparent per-cycle loss budget (2.5 dB from listed components, giving about 56% efficiency), explicit Poissonian error bars on the QBER values, a direct comparison with a hypothetical commercial LiNbO3 modulator in Fig. 4, and a clear proof-of-principle packet-processing demonstration in Fig. 7 with header-triggered variable delays. The 12-hour run, although feedback-assisted, is a useful systems-level data point. I also note that there is no fitted-parameter circularity: the only fit in the paper is the exponential decay in Fig. 4, and it is not used to define a target quantity.

major comments (4)
  1. [Experimental results, Fig. 5] The central qubit-storage claim rests on the QBER values in Fig. 5b, but the text states that 'the manual polarisation controllers are needed to compensate residual polarisation transformations for each storage cycle' and that the measurement basis is selected with a manual PC for each cycle. No zero-storage baseline QBER is reported, and no Mueller-matrix or polarization-dependent-loss characterization of the storage path is given. As written, the quoted QBER is not separated from per-cycle manual polarization alignment, so it cannot be assigned to the buffer alone. Please report a zero-cycle baseline for the same states, specify how many manual adjustments were made per storage cycle and basis, and provide a direct measurement of the round-trip polarization transformation (or at least an upper bound on PDL) showing that a single unitary polarization controller can in principle compensate it without bias.
  2. [Experimental results, Fig. 6] The 12-hour stability claim is made with an active VOPC recalibration routine that pauses the measurement whenever the QBER exceeds 5%. Consequently, Fig. 6 demonstrates the stability of the feedback-stabilized system rather than of the passive buffer itself, and the frequency of recalibration events is not reported. Please report the QBER before each recalibration, the total number of recalibrations over the 12 hours, and, if possible, a comparison segment with the feedback disabled, so that the reader can distinguish intrinsic drift from loop performance.
  3. [Experimental results, QBER calculation] The QBER values are computed as QBER = 1 - P_{|i>} with P_{|i>} = N_{D|i>}/(N_{D|i>}+N_{D|i>⊥}), but the per-state probabilities for H, V, D, and A at each cycle are not tabulated; only normalized curves are shown in Fig. 5a. The stated error bars are Poissonian counting errors only, and they do not include the systematic uncertainty from the manual PC settings, which is the procedure-sensitive part of the measurement. Please provide the raw probability matrix for each storage cycle, or a tomographic state or process fidelity, so that the reported error model matches the actual measurement procedure.
  4. [Experimental results, Fig. 4] The claim of about 56% per-cycle efficiency is supported by a component loss budget, but the exponential fit in Fig. 4 is not quantified. Please report the fitted per-cycle decay constant with its uncertainty and compare it with the loss budget. This would also substantiate the statement that retrieval events are visible after ten storage cycles and would make the efficiency claim independently checkable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Poled optical fibre phase modulator] The sentence 'the needed voltage to apply a π phase shift decreases from approximately (Vπ ≈ 5 kV) for 950 V to our device' is garbled and should be rephrased to state the poled and unpoled Vπ values clearly.
  2. [Experimental results, Fig. 4] The red LiNbO3 comparison curve should state the assumed per-cycle insertion loss explicitly, rather than only 'typical 3 dB loss', so that the comparison is reproducible.
  3. [Quantum network buffering, Fig. 1] The notation 'M1' in the text is confusing; please define whether it is a specific destination user or the set of M users, and use the notation consistently with the figure.
  4. [Experimental results, packet processing] The header is described as 'three extra pulses' that allow encoding of up to eight addresses 'assuming direct digital amplitude modulation'; please clarify how three pulses encode eight addresses and how the on/off encoding shown in Fig. 7 maps to the storage-cycle delay.
  5. [Experimental results, Fig. 5 caption] The caption reports an average QBER of 1.85±0.13% over all cycles, but the main text lists individual QBER values without defining whether the average is weighted or unweighted; please make the definition explicit.
  6. [Fibre-optical active loop memory] The phrase 'is about ≈6 μs' contains a redundant approximation symbol; please write 'about 6 μs' or 'approximately 6 μs'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity is present: the headline storage times, efficiencies, and QBER values are directly measured, and the self-citations supply context rather than load-bearing derivations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an experimental measurement chain rather than a formal derivation from fitted inputs. Storage and retrieval are demonstrated by direct photon counting: the per-cycle efficiency of about 56% is obtained from a stated loss budget composed of independently listed component losses, and the exponential decay fit in Fig. 4 is presentational, not definitional. The central polarization-qubit result is quantified by a QBER defined directly from detection probabilities in two mutually unbiased bases, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no equation whose inputs already contain the reported output. The self-citations to the Sagnac switch platform [37], the poled-fibre fabrication technique [41], and the earlier conference report [42] provide background or device provenance, while the present paper independently measures the modulator's V_pi, insertion loss, and switching response in Fig. 2; the companion submission [43] is contextual and is not used to establish the buffer results. The active polarization compensation is openly disclosed: manual polarization controllers are used per storage cycle, and the long-term stability run pauses and recalibrates the VOPC whenever the QBER exceeds 5%. This is a transparent experimental protocol that affects the interpretation of the reported QBER as a system-level figure including active stabilization, but it is not a circular step, because the measured quantities are not defined in terms of the claims they support. No load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem or imported ansatz is invoked to force the platform choice. The central contribution is therefore self-contained against the measured data, and the circularity score is zero.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters are load-bearing for the central demonstration; the listed free parameter is only a display fit. The axioms are domain assumptions about device behavior and polarization stability that the experiments rely on but do not independently verify.

free parameters (1)
  • Exponential decay rate of retrieved counts vs storage cycle (Fig 4) = not reported numerically (fit curve shown)
    Fitted to the measured counts per cycle; used only to display the buffer loss trend, not to set the 56% per-cycle efficiency, which comes from the component loss budget.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Sagnac interferometer output probabilities obey cos²(φ/2) and sin²(φ/2).
    Used to route photon to storage or exit based on phase φ (Section 'Fibre-optical active loop memory').
  • domain assumption Poled fibre phase modulator applies a polarization-insensitive phase shift to the 1546.9 nm pulses.
    Asserted as a key device property; the paper measures loss and switching speed (Fig 2) but does not present a quantitative polarization-dependence scan. Central to handling polarization-encoded qubits.
  • domain assumption Per-cycle residual polarization transformations are unitary and can be compensated by a single polarization controller.
    Relied on in all QBER measurements; the paper manually optimizes PCs for each storage cycle and uses a feedback VOPC for long-term stability (Fig 6), implying but not proving this assumption.
  • domain assumption Weak coherent states with mean photon number 0.1 are a valid stand-in for single-photon qubits for QBER estimation.
    The payload consists of WCSs with 0.1 photons/pulse; QBER is computed on detection events without accounting for multi-photon components.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An optical-fibre-integrated buffer for packet-switched quantum networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TISNUYBN

@misc{pith2026260804093,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An optical-fibre-integrated buffer for packet-switched quantum networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TISNUYBN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04093}
}
abstract

Packet-switched quantum networks require buffers that can delay qubit payloads while routing information is read out in real time. Previous approaches have not provided this functionality in a fully fibre-integrated architecture compatible with telecom infrastructure. Here we demonstrate an optical-fibre-integrated buffer, based on a recirculating loop and a fibre storage line, in which the storage time of a polarisation-encoded qubit payload is determined by readout of an attached packet header. The key component behind this achievement is an ultra-low-loss poled fibre phase modulator, which provides fast, polarisation-insensitive switching directly in fibre and allows header and payload to be processed within the buffer. We demonstrate storage and retrieval of polarisation-encoded qubit payloads for storage times up to 47 $\mu$s, with an average quantum bit error rate of 1.8% together with stable operation over several hours. These results establish a practical fibre-based architecture for packet-level quantum network buffering that can easily integrate into the current telecommunication infrastructure opening up new paths for deployment of the quantum internet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04093 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Quantum network packet switching. a) Packet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Poled fibre modulator. a) The cross-section of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. All-fibre quantum packet buffer implementation. We prepare weak coherent polarisation encoded qubits in the state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Buffer efficiency. A payload of 16 weak coherent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quantum information storage. a) Normalised single-photon detection following the projective polarisation measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Long-term stability of the buffer. QBER for detect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Quantum packet processing. The packet consists of a header containing three strong pulses, and the payload consists [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Effective qubit yield of room-temperature quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Fook Lee, G

    K. Fook Lee, G. G¨ ul, Z. Jim, and P. Kumar, Fiber loop quantum buffer for photonic qubits, New Journal of Physics26, 083011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  3. [2]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    2018

  4. [3]

    Gisin and R

    N. Gisin and R. Thew, Quantum communication, Nature Photonics1, 165 (2007)

    2007

  5. [4]

    Pirandola, U

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira,et al., Advances in quantum cryptography, Advances in Optics and Pho- tonics12, 1012 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Sys- tems and Signal Processing(Bangalore, India, 1984) pp. 175–179

    work page 1984

  7. [6]

    A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on bell’s the- orem, Physical Review Letters67, 661 (1991)

    work page 1991

  8. [7]

    H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and B. Qi, Measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution, Physical Review Letters108, 130503 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    Lucamarini, Z

    M. Lucamarini, Z. L. Yuan, J. F. Dynes, and A. J. Shields, Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters, Nature557, 400 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    Liao, W.-Q

    S.-K. Liao, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Li, J.-G. Ren, J. Yin, Q. Shen, Y. Cao, Z.-P. Li,et al., Satellite-to- ground quantum key distribution, Nature549, 43 (2017)

    2017

  3. [10]

    J. Yin, Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, B. Li, H. Dai,et al., Satellite- based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers, Science356, 1140 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    L. Zhou, J. Lin, C. Ge, Y. Fan, Z. Yuan, H. Dong, Y. Liu, D. Ma, J.-P. Chen, C. Jiang, X.-B. Wang, L.-X. You, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, Independent Optical Fre- quency Combs Powered 546 km Field Test of Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution, Physical Review Applied22, 064057 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Pittaluga, Y

    M. Pittaluga, Y. S. Lo, A. Brzosko, R. I. Woodward, D. Scalcon, M. S. Winnel, T. Roger, J. F. Dynes, K. A. Owen, S. Ju´ arez, P. Rydlichowski, D. Vicinanza, G. Roberts, and A. J. Shields, Long-distance coherent quantum communications in deployed telecom networks, Nature640, 911 (2025)

    2025

  6. [13]

    Pompili, C

    M. Pompili, C. Delle Donne, I. te Raa, B. van der Vecht, M. Skrzypczyk, G. Ferreira, L. de Kluijver, A. J. Stolk, S. L. N. Hermans, P. Pawe lczak, W. Kozlowski, R. Han- son, and S. Wehner, Experimental demonstration of en- tanglement delivery using a quantum network stack, npj...

    2022

  7. [14]

    DiAdamo, B

    S. DiAdamo, B. Qi, G. Miller, R. Kompella, and A. Sha- bani, Packet switching in quantum networks: A path to the quantum internet, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043064 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    Mandil, S

    R. Mandil, S. DiAdamo, B. Qi, and A. Shabani, Quan- tum key distribution in a packet-switched network, npj Quantum Information9, 85 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    S. J. Ben Yoo, S. K. Singh, M. B. On, G. G¨ ul, G. S. Kan- ter, R. Proietti, and P. Kumar, Quantum wrapper net- working, IEEE Communications Magazine62, 76 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Optical quantum memory, Nature Photonics3, 706 (2009)

    2009

  11. [18]

    Heshami, D

    K. Heshami, D. G. England, P. C. Humphreys, P. J. Bustard, V. M. Acosta, J. Nunn, and B. J. Sussman, Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances, Journal of Modern Optics63, 2005 (2016)

    2016

  12. [19]

    Bussi` eres, N

    F. Bussi` eres, N. Sangouard, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmat- ten, C. Simon, and W. Tittel, Prospective applications of optical quantum memories, Journal of Modern Optics 60, 1519 (2013)

    2013

  13. [20]

    A. Ortu, A. Holz¨ apfel, J. Etesse, and M. Afzelius, Storage of photonic time-bin qubits for up to 20 ms in a rare-earth doped crystal, npj Quantum Information8, 29 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Duranti, S

    S. Duranti, S. Wengerowsky, L. Feldmann, A. Seri, B. Casabone, and H. de Riedmatten, Efficient cavity- assisted storage of photonic qubits in a solid-state quan- tum memory, Optics Express32, 26884 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    T. B. Pittman and J. D. Franson, Cyclical quantum mem- ory for photonic qubits, Phys. Rev. A66, 062302 (2002)

    2002

  16. [23]

    Makino, Y

    K. Makino, Y. Hashimoto, J. ichi Yoshikawa, H. Ohdan, T. Toyama, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Synchro- nization of optical photons for quantum information pro- cessing, Science Advances2, e1501772 (2016)

    2016

  17. [24]

    Kaneda, F

    F. Kaneda, F. Xu, J. Chapman, and P. G. Kwiat, Quantum-memory-assisted multi-photon generation for efficient quantum information processing, Optica4, 1034 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    Kaneda and P

    F. Kaneda and P. G. Kwiat, High-efficiency single-photon generation via large-scale active time multiplexing, Sci- ence Advances5, eaaw8586 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    Meyer-Scott, N

    E. Meyer-Scott, N. Prasannan, I. Dhand, C. Eigner, V. Quiring, S. Barkhofen, B. Brecht, M. B. Plenio, and C. Silberhorn, Scalable generation of multiphoton en- tangled states by active feed-forward and multiplexing, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 150501 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Hou, J.-F

    Z. Hou, J.-F. Tang, C.-J. Huang, Y.-F. Huang, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Entangled-state time multiplexing for multiphoton entanglement generation, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, L011002 (2023)

    2023

  21. [28]

    L. T. Weinbrenner, N. Prasannan, K. Hansenne, S. Denker, J. Sperling, B. Brecht, C. Silberhorn, and O. G¨ uhne, Certifying the topology of quantum networks: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 240802 (2024)

    2024

  22. [29]

    Hanamura, K

    F. Hanamura, K. Takase, K. Hirota, R. Nehra, F. Lang, S. Miki, H. Terai, M. Yabuno, T. Kashiwazaki, A. In- oue, T. Umeki, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, J.-i. Yoshikawa, and A. Furusawa, Scalable optical quantum state synthe- sizer with dual-mode resonator memory, PRX Quantum 6, 040336 (2025)

    2025

  23. [30]

    Pang, C.-N

    X.-L. Pang, C.-N. Zhang, J.-P. Dou, H. Li, T.-H. Yang, and X.-M. Jin, Entangling motional atoms and an optical loop at ambient condition, npj Quantum Information9, 62 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    K. A. G. Bonsma-Fisher, C. Hnatovsky, D. Grobnic, S. J. Mihailov, P. J. Bustard, D. G. England, and B. J. Sussman, Fiber-integrated quantum memory for telecom light, Phys. Rev. A108, 012606 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    K. A. G. Bonsma-Fisher, R. Tannous, D. Poitras, C. Hna- tovsky, S. J. Mihailov, P. J. Bustard, D. G. England, and B. J. Sussman, Storage of telecom wavelength heralded 11 single photons in a fiber cavity quantum memory, Optica Quantum2, 41 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    C. J. Evans, C. M. Nunn, S. W. L. Cheng, J. D. Franson, and T. B. Pittman, Experimental storage of photonic po- larization entanglement in a broadband loop-based quan- tum memory, Phys. Rev. A108, L050601 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Cheng, C

    S. Cheng, C. Evans, and T. Pittman, Fiber-coupled broadband quantum memory for polarization-encoded photonic qubits, npj Quantum Information11, 163 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Sun, C.-H

    M.-S. Sun, C.-H. Zhang, Y.-Z. Luo, S. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Li, and Q. Wang, On-demand storing time-bin qubit states with optical quantum memory, Applied Physics Letters126, 104001 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Alarc´ on, P

    A. Alarc´ on, P. Gonz´ alez, J. Cari˜ ne, G. Lima, and G. B. Xavier, Polarization-independent single-photon switch based on a fiber-optical sagnac interferometer for quan- tum communication networks, Optics Express28, 33731 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    R. A. Myers, N. Mukherjee, and S. R. J. Brueck, Large second-order nonlinearity in poled fused silica, Optics Letters16, 1732 (1991)

    1991

  31. [39]

    P. G. Kazansky, P. S. J. Russell, and H. Takebe, Glass fiber poling and applications, Journal of Lightwave Tech- nology15, 1484 (1997)

    1997

  32. [40]

    Fujiwara, D

    T. Fujiwara, D. Wong, Y. Zhao, S. Fleming, S. Poole, and M. Sceats, Electro-optic modulation in germanosilicate fibre with uv-excited poling, Electronics Letters31, 573 (1995)

    1995

  33. [41]

    Fokine, L

    M. Fokine, L. E. Nilsson, ˚A. Claesson, D. Berlemont, L. Kjellberg, L. Krummenacher, and W. Margulis, In- tegrated fiber mach–zehnder interferometer for electro- optic switching, Optics Letters27, 1643 (2002)

    2002

  34. [42]

    Spegel-Lexne, J

    D. Spegel-Lexne, J. M. B. Pereira, A. Alarc´ on, J. Argillander, M. Clason, ˚A. Claesson, K. H. Tow, W. Margulis, and G. B. Xavier, Storage buffer of po- larization quantum states based on a poled-fiber phase modulator, inCLEO 2025(Optica Publishing Group,

    2025

  35. [43]

    Guerrero, N

    N. Guerrero, N. Villalva, G. H. dos Santos, C. J. Salazar, C. Melo, F. Castillo, J. Cari˜ ne, G. B. Xavier, E. S. G´ omez, S. P. Walborn, J. Pereira, G. Saavedra, and G. Lima, Poled-fibre phase modulator for efficient high- dimensional quantum measurements, Submitted com- pani...

    2026

  36. [44]

    A. R. Camara, J. M. B. Pereira, O. Tarasenko, W. Mar- gulis, and I. C. S. Carvalho, Optical creation and erasure of the linear electrooptical effect in silica fiber, Opt. Ex- press23, 18060 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Alarc´ on, J

    A. Alarc´ on, J. Argillander, D. Spegel-Lexne, and G. B. Xavier, Dynamic generation of photonic spatial quantum states with an all-fiber platform, Opt. Express31, 10673 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Spegel-Lexne, S

    D. Spegel-Lexne, S. G´ omez, J. Argillander, M. Paw lowski, P. R. Dieguez, A. Alarc´ on, and G. B. Xavier, Experimental demonstration of the equivalence of entropic uncertainty with wave-particle duality, Science Advances10, eadr2007 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    C. Raj, T. Prasad, A. Chaturvedi, L. Pollyceno, D. Spegel-Lexne, S. G´ omez, J. Argillander, A. Alarc´ on, G. B. Xavier, M. Paw lowski, and P. R. Dieguez, Certi- fying semi-device-independent security via wave-particle duality experiments, npj Quantum Information12, 7 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Argillander, D

    J. Argillander, D. Spegel-Lexne, M. Clason, P. R. Dieguez, M. Paw lowski, A. Chaturvedi, and G. B. Xavier, High-dimensional detection-loophole-free measurement- device-independent quantum random number generator (2025), arXiv:2510.06317 [quant-ph]

    2025

  41. [49]

    Vijayadharan, M

    K. Vijayadharan, M. R. Bola˜ nos, M. Avesani, G. Val- lone, P. Villoresi, and C. Agnesi, A sagnac-based arbi- trary time-bin state encoder for quantum communication applications, EPJ Quantum Technology12, 129 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    K. F. Reim, P. Michelberger, K. C. Lee, J. Nunn, N. K. Langford, and I. A. Walmsley, Single-photon-level quan- tum memory at room temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 053603 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Finkelstein, E

    R. Finkelstein, E. Poem, O. Michel, O. Lahad, and O. Firstenberg, Fast, noise-free memory for photon syn- chronization at room temperature, Science Advances4, eaap8598 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    K. T. Kaczmarek, P. M. Ledingham, B. Brecht, S. E. Thomas, G. S. Thekkadath, O. Lazo-Arjona, J. H. D. Munns, E. Poem, A. Feizpour, D. J. Saunders, J. Nunn, and I. A. Walmsley, High-speed noise-free optical quan- tum memory, Phys. Rev. A97, 042316 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    S. E. Thomas, S. Sagona-Stophel, Z. Schofield, I. A. Walmsley, and P. M. Ledingham, Single-photon- compatible telecommunications-band quantum memory in a hot atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, L031005 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    S. E. Thomas, L. Wagner, R. Joos, R. Sittig, C. Nawrath, P. Burdekin, I. M. de Buy Wenniger, M. J. Rasiah, T. Huber-Loyola, S. Sagona-Stophel, S. H¨ ofling, M. Jet- ter, P. Michler, I. A. Walmsley, S. L. Portalupi, and P. M. Ledingham, Deterministic storage and retrieval of te...

    2024

  47. [55]

    Gr¨ unenfelder, A

    F. Gr¨ unenfelder, A. Boaron, G. V. Resta, M. Perrenoud, D. Rusca, C. Barreiro, R. Houlmann, R. Sax, L. Stasi, S. El-Khoury, E. H¨ anggi, N. Bosshard, F. Bussi` eres, and H. Zbinden, Fast single-photon detectors and real-time key distillation enable high secret-key-rate quantu...

    2023

  48. [56]

    Y. Xu, W. Chen, H. Liang, Y.-H. Li, F.-T. Liang, Q. Shen, S.-K. Liao, and C.-Z. Peng, Megahertz high voltage pulse generator suitable for capacitive load, AIP Advances7, 115210 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    G. B. Xavier, J.- ˚A. Larsson, P. Villoresi, G. Vallone, and A. Cabello, Energy-time and time-bin entanglement: past, present and future, npj Quantum Information11, 129 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Zhong, X.-H

    Z.-Q. Zhong, X.-H. Zhan, J.-L. Chen, S. Wang, Z.-Q. Yin, J.-Q. Geng, D.-Y. He, W. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, Hyperentanglement quantum communication over a 50 km noisy fiber channel, Optica11, 1056 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.