Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

ToolArtist: Tool-Using Unified Multimodal Models for Agentic Image Generation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read ToolArtist claims that a single unified multimodal policy can reason, search the web, and natively draw the final image, and that this fully agentic loop beats fixed and partial-agentic pipelines on open-world image generation.

desk verdict A genuinely new training recipe for making image generation a native UMM agent action, with large reported gains but a real reporting flaw: the Qwen-Image baseline cited in the text is missing from Table 1, and no error bars are given. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04436 v1 pith:WMP6B73R submitted 2026-08-05 cs.CV

Jiahao Zhao , Xiaomin Yu , Zhongxiang Sun , Fengwei Teng , Chengwei Qin , Xiaobin Hu , Jun Xu , Shuicheng Yan This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords agenticimagegenerationunifiedmultimodalmodeltoolusereinforcementlearningGRPOopen-worldtext-to-imageworldknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ToolArtist claims that open-world image generation improves when a single unified multimodal model controls the whole loop: reasoning about missing knowledge, deciding to search text or images, using the returned evidence, and natively drawing the final image, rather than routing these steps through a fixed pipeline or an external generator. The paper post-trains a unified multimodal model in two stages: supervised fine-tuning on 7,132 teacher trajectories in which the external draw tool is hidden while its generated images are kept as native visual tokens, then reinforcement learning with RAD-GRPO, which rewards both the generation caption (intent) and the final image (quality). On the WISE and WorldGenBench-Humanities benchmarks, the fully agentic policy reaches WISE overall 0.79 and an average KCS of 22.10, the best non-proprietary result reported. The reason to care is that factual, long-tail, and time-sensitive image requests cannot be satisfied from static model parameters, so a policy that can fetch and verify evidence inside the generation loop is a direct route to grounding images in world knowledge.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the unified multimodal sequence treated as an agentic policy: text tokens carry reasoning and tool calls, visual-token spans carry both retrieved references and generated images, so reasoning, acting, and drawing are actions in one token distribution. Around that, three devices carry the argument: (1) agentic masking, which trains only policy-generated tokens and leaves user instructions and tool observations as conditioning context; (2) trajectory conversion, which rewrites an external draw call as a native caption-plus-image-token span so the UMM learns to draw without an external generator; and (3) RAD-GRPO, a group-relative policy optimization objective whose dual rewards, an intent reward on the feasibility and completeness of the final visual caption and a quality reward from a world-knowledge reward model weighting faithfulness 0.1, visual correctness 0.4, text accuracy 0.4, and aesthetics 0.1, propagate outcome feedback across the whole trajectory.

What would settle it

Run the released SFT and RL pipeline with the world-knowledge reward model replaced by direct feedback from WISE's WiScore or WorldGenBench's KCS checklists on a held-out set, keeping everything else fixed; if the retrained model does not match the reported 0.79 WISE and 22.10 KCS averages, the original gains came from aligning to a reward model that the benchmarks do not share.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that open-world image generation should be a single agentic loop, not a preset sequence of separate stages. ToolArtist instantiates this by post-training Emu3.5, a unified multimodal model in which text and images are tokens of one autoregressive sequence, so reasoning spans, tool-call commands, retrieved evidence, and generated image spans all belong to one policy. Teacher trajectories are converted so the external image-generation tool is concealed while its generated images are kept as native visual-caption and visual-token spans, letting the UMM learn drawing as part of the agent trajectory. RAD-GRPO then optimizes full trajectories with an intent reward on the final visual caption and a four-dimension quality reward from a world-knowledge reward model, together with format, draw, and length signals. The reported outcome is that this fully agentic policy reaches WISE overall 0.79 and a WorldGenBench-Humanities average KCS of 22.10, the best non-proprietary result in the paper's comparison tables.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the paper's not-described world-knowledge reward model, with hand-set weights of faithfulness 0.1, visual correctness 0.4, text accuracy 0.4, and aesthetics 0.1, actually tracks what WISE and WorldGenBench reward; the paper does not validate that reward model against human ratings or benchmark scores, so if it rewards LLM-judge preferences instead of world knowledge, the RAD-GRPO gains could be partly reward hacking.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single-policy formulation outperforms fixed-pipeline and search-then-generate baselines: WISE overall 0.79 versus 0.77 for the compared agentic systems, and WorldGenBench-Humanities average KCS 22.10 versus 21.76 for the strongest open baseline.
  • Agentic reinforcement learning improves over SFT: training dynamics show the overall reward rising from the mid-training range around 0.37–0.40 to about 0.41, while generation entropy stays stable near 11.9 without collapsing.
  • Source-aware summaries attached to image-search results are essential: removing them drops WISE overall from 0.79 to 0.61, with the largest loss in Biology (−0.50).
  • The auxiliary no-draw penalty and length penalty keep the policy from collapsing into search-only behavior, so the learned trajectories reliably reach native image generation.
  • Because the SFT data and the post-training infrastructure are released, the same two-stage recipe can be applied to other unified multimodal models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the trajectory-conversion recipe should transfer to any UMM that tokenizes images, making the claim a general post-training method rather than an Emu3.5-specific fix.
  • Beyond the paper: the reward weights (0.1/0.4/0.4/0.1) are hand-set, and reweighting them on a validation set would be a cheap test of whether the same benchmark numbers persist.
  • Beyond the paper: the large Biology drop when image summaries are removed suggests the quality reward may be optimizing LLM-judge taste rather than the KCS checklists; comparing reward-model scores with checklist scores per item would reveal the divergence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. ToolArtist post-trains the Emu3.5 unified multimodal model into a single fully agentic policy for open-world text-to-image generation: given a request, one autoregressive policy interleaves reasoning, text and image search tool calls, evidence aggregation, and native generation of image tokens, deciding itself when to search and when to draw. Training proceeds in two stages. First, SFT on 7,132 teacher-rollout trajectories: a teacher agent with text/image search plus an external image generator (gemini-3-pro-image-preview) produces multi-turn trajectories, which are converted to UMM format by hiding the external 'draw' tool and retaining the teacher's generated images as native visual-token supervision targets. Second, RAD-GRPO (Reason-Act-Draw GRPO) optimizes full online trajectories with an intent reward on the final visual caption and a quality reward from an undisclosed 'world-knowledge reward model' (four dimensions, weights 0.1/0.4/0.4/0.1), combined with auxiliary format, draw-signal, length, and no-draw penalties. Evaluations on WISE and WorldGenBench-Humanities report WISE Overall 0.79 and WorldGenBench-Humanities average KCS 22.10, claimed as the best non-proprietary result over Unify-Agent (fixed pipeline), GenSearcher (search agent plus external generator), and a Qwen-Image baseline discussed in the text but not present in Table 1. The dataset and post-training infrastructure are released.

Significance. If its empirical claims hold, ToolArtist is a meaningful advance for agentic image generation: it shows that tool use and image generation can be orchestrated by a single autoregressive UMM policy and that group-relative RL can improve such search-to-draw trajectories, with a large WorldGenBench-Humanities advantage over the pipeline-based Unify-Agent (22.10 vs 15.58). The paper ships concrete assets, namely the released 7,132-trajectory corpus and full SFT/RL infrastructure, a clean policy-support masking objective that supervises only policy-generated tokens (Section 2.3), a token-normalized GRPO variant with dual intent/quality rewards, and detailed checklist-level qualitative comparisons (Section 5.3 and A.2) that make residual failure modes explicit rather than hidden. The source-summary ablation (Table 2) is a genuinely informative component analysis: removing image-source summaries drops WISE from 0.79 to 0.61, with a 0.50 collapse on Biology.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2 and Table 1] The headline 'best non-proprietary' claim rests on a baseline that is not in the results table. Section 4.2 states that the strongest newly evaluated open-source baseline, Qwen-Image, obtains a 21.76 WorldGenBench-Humanities average KCS and leads Europe, North America, and Oceania, yet Table 1 contains no Qwen-Image row; as printed, ToolArtist has the highest EU score (18.69), and the marked continent winners in the table are ToolArtist (AF, AN, AS) and Unify-Agent (SA). This is an internal inconsistency: either the Qwen-Image row must be added with the same seven continent scores so that 22.10 vs 21.76 and the claimed continent split can be verified, or the text must be revised to avoid claims unsupported by the table. The best/second-best non-proprietary markers in Table 1 are also potentially affected by the missing row.
  2. [Section 4 (Table 1 and result discussion)] No uncertainty quantification is provided anywhere in the experiments. The WISE margin over both Unify-Agent and GenSearcher is 0.02 (0.79 vs 0.77), and the WorldGenBench-Humanities margin over Qwen-Image is 0.34 (22.10 vs 21.76); with 732 prompts, a coarse checklist score, and LLM-judge evaluation, these differences are within plausible run-to-run and judge variance. Please report the number of independent runs/seeds, judge-repetition statistics (e.g., mean and standard deviation over multiple judge calls), or bootstrap confidence intervals over prompts, and state explicitly which reported numbers come from a single evaluation.
  3. [Section 3.3] The RL quality reward is described as a 'world-knowledge reward model' with four dimensions (faithfulness 0.1, visual correctness 0.4, text accuracy 0.4, aesthetics 0.1), but its architecture, training data, and validation are not reported, and the mixing coefficient alpha = 0.5 has no sensitivity analysis. Since the RL gains are measured on WISE and WorldGenBench, both judged by LLM protocols whose criteria overlap with these reward dimensions (WISE uses image-text consistency 0.4, realism 0.3, aesthetics 0.3), the improvement from RAD-GRPO could partly reflect optimizing the proxy rather than the target. Please describe the reward model (including the text-accuracy fallback logic), validate it against human ratings or benchmark subscores on a held-out set, and report how the RL results change with alpha and with the dimension weights.
  4. [Sections 4.1 and 4.2] The central claim that fully agentic control outperforms fixed pipelines and search-then-generate approaches is supported only by cross-model comparisons: ToolArtist (Emu3.5 base) is compared with Unify-Agent (a different UMM in a prescribed pipeline) and GenSearcher (a search agent whose base generator is Qwen-Image). The WorldGenBench-Humanities gap over Unify-Agent (22.10 vs 15.58) could be due to the base model, the search tools, or the SFT data rather than to full agentic control. A same-backbone control, such as Emu3.5 trained under the same data and infrastructure but with a fixed search-then-draw order, or with generation delegated to an external generator, is needed to attribute the gain to the agentic formulation; the Section 5.2 ablation addresses a different component (image-source summaries) and does not control this variable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 1] In the WorldGenBench-Humanities block, the reported 'A vg.' values are not the arithmetic means of the seven continent scores (ToolArtist: mean about 20.91 vs reported 22.10; Unify-Agent: mean about 16.21 vs reported 15.58; GenSearcher: mean about 12.58 vs reported 13.66). If the average is weighted by number of countries or prompts per continent, the weights should be stated; otherwise the values should be corrected. The WISE 'A vg.' column is likewise not the mean of the six category scores, and how the official WiScore (with 0.4/0.3/0.3 criteria weights) relates to it should be clarified.
  2. [Section 3.3] The phrase 'In code, it is judged by a world-knowledge reward model' reads like an implementation note and should be rephrased descriptively; also, the sentence 'If the task does not require readable text, text accuracy falls back to 0.5' is ambiguous as to whether the score or the weight becomes 0.5 and how the weighted combination is renormalized.
  3. [Table 1 caption] The caption mentions a 'collected source table'; please state explicitly which baseline numbers are taken from the original papers and which were re-evaluated by the authors, including the judge model and the number of judge calls per image, so that the provenance of each column entry is auditable.
  4. [Section 5.2] The source-summary ablation is reported only on WISE. Given that the largest effect is on Biology (a factual-identity category) and that WorldGenBench-Humanities is the other headline benchmark, the same ablation should be reported on WorldGenBench-Humanities for completeness.
  5. [Sections 5.3 and A.2] The qualitative cases are explicitly selected from examples where ToolArtist outperforms both baselines (stated in A.2). The same selection caveat should be present at the first presentation in Section 5.3, and aggregate win rates or per-prompt KCS statistics over the full benchmark would strengthen the qualitative claim beyond favorable examples.
  6. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The phrase 'consistently outperforms approaches with fixed pipelines or only partially agent-controlled components' is stronger than the reported numbers support: on WISE Time, both Unify-Agent (0.75) and GenSearcher (0.71) exceed ToolArtist (0.62), and GenSearcher also exceeds ToolArtist on Space (0.82 vs 0.75) and Biology (0.76 vs 0.75). The overall averages favor ToolArtist, but the category-level reversals should be acknowledged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the RL reward overlaps thematically with evaluation criteria but is not shown to be the benchmark, and the Table 1 omission is a reporting inconsistency, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central claim is that post-training a UMM with agentic SFT and RAD-GRPO yields a fully agentic policy that outperforms fixed-pipeline and search-then-generate baselines on WISE and WorldGenBench-Humanities. Walking the derivation chain: SFT trajectories are produced by a teacher agent with search tools plus gemini-3-pro-image-preview and converted into native image-token supervision (Section 3.1); this is distillation, not circularity. RL uses RAD-GRPO with intent and quality rewards (Section 3.3); the quality reward is a hand-weighted combination of faithfulness, visual correctness, text accuracy, and aesthetics. These dimensions resemble WISE's LLM-judge criteria (image-text consistency, realism, aesthetic quality) and WorldGenBench's checklist axis, so if the reward model were the benchmark itself the claim would be circular. But the paper does not state that the reward model is the benchmark, does not fit the reward to benchmark scores, and evaluation uses the benchmarks' own published protocols (WiScore LLM judge, KCS checklists). Optimizing a proxy that is correlated with the evaluation metric is standard training, not reduction-by-construction, absent evidence that the reward is the evaluation. The cited prior work [25, 37] overlaps with the authors but is background on search agents and is not load-bearing. The main verifiability problems—the omission of the Qwen-Image row from Table 1, the lack of confidence intervals, and the undisclosed reward model—are correctness and reporting concerns, not circularity. No step in the paper's equations equates a prediction to an input by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on hand-set reward weights (alpha and four quality dimensions), on the unverified fidelity of the teacher-to-native conversion, on the stability of live web search, on the validity of an undisclosed reward model, and on the benchmark metrics as truthful measures of world knowledge.

free parameters (2)
  • reward mixing coefficient alpha = 0.5 (default)
    Balances the intent reward and the quality reward in RAD-GRPO; chosen by hand, no sensitivity analysis reported.
  • quality reward dimension weights = faithfulness 0.1, visual correctness 0.4, text accuracy 0.4, aesthetics 0.1 (text accuracy falls back to 0.5 when no…
    Hand-selected weights for the world-knowledge reward model; no fitting procedure or ablation of these weights is shown.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Emu3.5's visual tokenizer and decoder can faithfully encode externally generated images so the converted SFT trajectories teach real native generation.
    The convert stage in Section 3.1 represents the teacher's output image as visual tokens and asks the UMM to produce it; no reconstruction fidelity or tokenization analysis is provided.
  • domain assumption The online search tools (Google Search, Jina Reader) return reliable and relevant evidence during both data generation and inference.
    Section 3.1 describes the tools but no quality control or failure-rate analysis is reported.
  • domain assumption The undisclosed world-knowledge reward model is a faithful proxy for benchmark correctness.
    Section 3.3 uses it as the quality reward; without details or correlation with benchmarks, the RL objective may be misaligned.
  • standard math Standard GRPO clipped surrogate and KL regularization assumptions hold for UMM trajectories with policy-support masking.
    Equations (2)-(3) in Section 3.3 apply standard GRPO; the token-normalized group advantage is a straightforward extension, but the statistical assumptions are not scrutinized.
  • domain assumption WISE and WorldGenBench-Humanities scores measure open-world image-generation ability.
    Section 4.1 relies on LLM-as-judge (WISE) and knowledge checklist (KCS) metrics; their validity is taken from the benchmark papers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ToolArtist: Tool-Using Unified Multimodal Models for Agentic Image Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WMP6B73R

@misc{pith2026260804436,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ToolArtist: Tool-Using Unified Multimodal Models for Agentic Image Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WMP6B73R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04436}
}
read the original abstract

Text-to-image (T2I) models can produce visually compelling images, yet they remain limited on open-world tasks that require complex semantic understanding, multi-step reasoning, and the integration of external world knowledge. Existing efforts introduce agent capabilities into image generation, but they either prescribe a fixed workflow or place only a subset of the open-world image generation process under agent control. Consequently, reasoning, tool invocation, and image generation are not coordinated by a single policy. We propose ToolArtist, a fully agentic image generation model obtained by post-training a Unified Multimodal Model (UMM). ToolArtist dynamically orchestrates reasoning, external tool use, and native image generation within one unified policy. During Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), we equip a teacher agent with search tools alongside an image-generation tool. We then convert the collected trajectories into a UMM compatible format, where the image-generation tool is concealed while the resulting generated images are retained. During Reinforcement Learning (RL), we develop an agentic RL infrastructure for UMMs and introduce Reason-Act-Draw GRPO (RAD-GRPO), which uses complementary intent and quality rewards to jointly optimize the model. Experiments show that placing the entire open-world image-generation process under an agent policy consistently outperforms approaches with fixed pipelines or only partially agent-controlled components. We release the training data and the complete post-training infrastructure.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Align Beyond Prompts: Evaluating World Knowledge Alignment in Text-to-Image Generation

    Align beyond prompts: Evaluating world knowledge alignment in text-to-image generation, 2025. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.18730

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Blip3-o: A family of fully open unified multimodal models-architecture, training and dataset, 2025

    Jiuhai Chen, Zhiyang Xu, Xichen Pan, Yushi Hu, Can Qin, Tom Goldstein, Lifu Huang, Tianyi Zhou, Saining Xie, Silvio Savarese, Le Xue, Caiming Xiong, and Ran Xu. Blip3-o: A family of fully open unified multimodal models-architecture, training and dataset, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09568

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Pixart-α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis, 2023

    Junsong Chen, Jincheng Yu, Chongjian Ge, Lewei Yao, Enze Xie, Yue Wu, Zhongdao Wang, James Kwok, Ping Luo, Huchuan Lu, and Zhenguo Li. Pixart-α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00426

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Unify-agent: A unified multimodal agent for world-grounded image synthesis, 2026

    Shuang Chen, Quanxin Shou, Hangting Chen, Yucheng Zhou, Kaituo Feng, Wenbo Hu, Yi-Fan Zhang, Yunlong Lin, Wenxuan Huang, Mingyang Song, Dasen Dai, Bolin Jiang, Manyuan Zhang, Shi-Xue Zhang, Zhengkai Jiang, Lucas Wang, Zhao Zhong, Yu Cheng, and Nanyun Peng. Unify-agent: A unified multimodal agent for world-grounded image synthesis, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.o...

    arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Genevolve: Self-evolving image generation agents via tool-orchestrated visual experience distillation, 2026

    Sixiang Chen, Zhaohu Xing, Tian Ye, Xinyu Geng, Yunlong Lin, Jianyu Lai, Xuanhua He, Fuxiang Zhai, Jialin Gao, and Lei Zhu. Genevolve: Self-evolving image generation agents via tool-orchestrated visual experience distillation, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21605

    arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Wenhu Chen, Hexiang Hu, Chitwan Saharia, and William W. Cohen. Re-imagen: Retrieval-augmented text-to- image generator, 2022. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14491

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Janus-pro: Unified multimodal understanding and generation with data and model scaling, 2025

    Xiaokang Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Xingchao Liu, Zizheng Pan, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, Xingkai Yu, and Chong Ruan. Janus-pro: Unified multimodal understanding and generation with data and model scaling, 2025. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2501.17811

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Emu3.5: Native multimodal models are world learners, 2025

    Yufeng Cui, Honghao Chen, Haoge Deng, Xu Huang, Xinghang Li, Jirong Liu, Yang Liu, Zhuoyan Luo, Jinsheng Wang, Wenxuan Wang, Yueze Wang, Chengyuan Wang, Fan Zhang, Yingli Zhao, Ting Pan, Xianduo Li, Zecheng Hao, Wenxuan Ma, Zhuo Chen, Yulong Ao, Tiejun Huang, Zhongyuan Wang, and Xinlong Wang. Emu3.5: Native multimodal models are world learners, 2025. URLh...

    arXiv 2025

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining, 2025

    Chaorui Deng, Deyao Zhu, Kunchang Li, Chenhui Gou, Feng Li, Zeyu Wang, Shu Zhong, Weihao Yu, Xiaonan Nie, Ziang Song, Guang Shi, and Haoqi Fan. Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14683

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Gen-searcher: Reinforcing agentic search for image generation, 2026

    Kaituo Feng, Manyuan Zhang, Shuang Chen, Yunlong Lin, Kaixuan Fan, Yilei Jiang, Hongyu Li, Dian Zheng, Chenyang Wang, and Xiangyu Yue. Gen-searcher: Reinforcing agentic search for image generation, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28767

    2026 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Commonsense-t2i challenge: Can text-to- image generation models understand commonsense?, 2024

    Xingyu Fu, Muyu He, Yujie Lu, William Yang Wang, and Dan Roth. Commonsense-t2i challenge: Can text-to- image generation models understand commonsense?, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07546

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Demystifying flux architecture, 2025

    Or Greenberg. Demystifying flux architecture, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09595

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Beyond words and pixels: A benchmark for implicit world knowledge reasoning in generative models, 2025

    Tianyang Han, Junhao Su, Junjie Hu, Peizhen Yang, Hengyu Shi, Junfeng Luo, and Jialin Gao. Beyond words and pixels: A benchmark for implicit world knowledge reasoning in generative models, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18271

    2025

  6. [14]

    Hsin-Ping Huang, Xinyi Wang, Yonatan Bitton, Hagai Taitelbaum, Gaurav Singh Tomar, Ming-Wei Chang, Xuhui Jia, Kelvin C. K. Chan, Hexiang Hu, Yu-Chuan Su, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Kitten: A knowledge-intensive evaluation of image generation on visual entities, 2025. URLhttps://arxi...

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    T2i-factualbench: Benchmarking the factuality of text-to-image models with knowledge-intensive concepts

    Ziwei Huang, Wanggui He, Quanyu Long, Yandi Wang, Haoyuan Li, Zhelun Yu, Fangxun Shu, Weilong Dai, Hao Jiang, Fei Wu, and Leilei Gan. T2i-factualbench: Benchmarking the factuality of text-to-image models with knowledge-intensive concepts. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeti...

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Genagent: Scaling text-to-image generation via agentic multimodal reasoning, 2026

    Kaixun Jiang, Yuzheng Wang, Junjie Zhou, Pandeng Li, Zhihang Liu, Chen-Wei Xie, Zhaoyu Chen, Yun Zheng, and Wenqiang Zhang. Genagent: Scaling text-to-image generation via agentic multimodal reasoning, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18543. 14

    2026

  9. [17]

    Playground v2.5: Three insights towards enhancing aesthetic quality in text-to-image generation, 2024

    Daiqing Li, Aleks Kamko, Ehsan Akhgari, Ali Sabet, Linmiao Xu, and Suhail Doshi. Playground v2.5: Three insights towards enhancing aesthetic quality in text-to-image generation, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2402.17245

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Llms-as-judges: A comprehensive survey on llm-based evaluation methods, 2024

    Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen, Huixue Su, Yujia Zhou, Qingyao Ai, Ziyi Ye, and Yiqun Liu. Llms-as-judges: A comprehensive survey on llm-based evaluation methods, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05579

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Unigrpo: Unified policy optimization for reasoning-driven visual generation,

    Jie Liu, Zilyu Ye, Linxiao Yuan, Shenhan Zhu, Yu Gao, Jie Wu, Kunchang Li, Xionghui Wang, Xiaonan Nie, Weilin Huang, and Wanli Ouyang. Unigrpo: Unified policy optimization for reasoning-driven visual generation,

  12. [20]

    Towards unified multimodal interleaved generation via group relative policy optimization, 2026

    Ming Nie, Chunwei Wang, Jianhua Han, Hang Xu, and Li Zhang. Towards unified multimodal interleaved generation via group relative policy optimization, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09538

    2026

  13. [21]

    Wise: A world knowledge-informed semantic evaluation for text-to-image generation, 2026

    Yuwei Niu, Munan Ning, Mengren Zheng, Weiyang Jin, Bin Lin, Peng Jin, Jiaqi Liao, Chaoran Feng, Fanqing Meng, Kunpeng Ning, Bin Zhu, and Li Yuan. Wise: A world knowledge-informed semantic evaluation for text-to-image generation, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07265

    2026 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis, 2023

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01952

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Bermano, and Ohad Fried

    Rotem Shalev-Arkushin, Rinon Gal, Amit H. Bermano, and Ohad Fried. Imagerag: Dynamic image retrieval for reference-guided image generation, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09411

    2026

  16. [24]

    Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, Y. K. Li, Y. Wu, and Daya Guo. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    R1-searcher++: Incentivizing the dynamic knowledge acquisition of llms via reinforcement learning, 2025

    Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Wenqing Tian, Zhipeng Chen, Yuhuan Wu, Jiahao Zhao, Yingqian Min, Wayne Xin Zhao, Lei Fang, and Ji-Rong Wen. R1-searcher++: Incentivizing the dynamic knowledge acquisition of llms via reinforcement learning, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17005

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Longcat-image technical report, 2025

    Meituan LongCat Team, Hanghang Ma, Haoxian Tan, Jiale Huang, Junqiang Wu, Jun-Yan He, Lishuai Gao, Songlin Xiao, Xiaoming Wei, Xiaoqi Ma, Xunliang Cai, Yayong Guan, and Jie Hu. Longcat-image technical report, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07584

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hunyuanimage 3.0 technical report, 2026

    Tencent Hunyuan Foundation Model Team. Hunyuanimage 3.0 technical report, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2509.23951

    2026 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Search beyond what can be taught: Evolving the knowledge boundary in agentic visual generation, 2026

    Haozhe Wang, Weijia Feng, Jinpeng Yu, Che Liu, Ping Nie, Fangzhen Lin, Jiaming Liu, Ruihua Huang, Jimmy Lin, Wenhu Chen, and Cong Wei. Search beyond what can be taught: Evolving the knowledge boundary in agentic visual generation, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05382

    2026 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Emu3: Next-token prediction is all you need, 2024

    Xinlong Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Zhengxiong Luo, Quan Sun, Yufeng Cui, Jinsheng Wang, Fan Zhang, Yueze Wang, Zhen Li, Qiying Yu, Yingli Zhao, Yulong Ao, Xuebin Min, Tao Li, Boya Wu, Bo Zhao, Bowen Zhang, Liangdong Wang, Guang Liu, Zheqi He, Xi Yang, Jingjing Liu, Yonghua Lin, Tie...

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Visual chatgpt: Talking, drawing and editing with visual foundation models, 2023

    Chenfei Wu, Shengming Yin, Weizhen Qi, Xiaodong Wang, Zecheng Tang, and Nan Duan. Visual chatgpt: Talking, drawing and editing with visual foundation models, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04671

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Idea2img: Iterative self-refinement with gpt-4v(ision) for automatic image design and generation, 2024

    Zhengyuan Yang, Jianfeng Wang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Chung-Ching Lin, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. Idea2img: Iterative self-refinement with gpt-4v(ision) for automatic image design and generation, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08541

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models, 2023

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Genclaw: Code-driven agentic image generation, 2026

    Junyan Ye, Jun He, Zilong Huang, Dongzhi Jiang, Xuan Yang, Rui Chen, and Weijia Li. Genclaw: Code-driven agentic image generation, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30248

    2026 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Genpilot: A multi-agent system for test-time prompt optimization in image generation, 2025

    Wen Ye, Zhaocheng Liu, Yuwei Gui, Tingyu Yuan, Yunyue Su, Bowen Fang, Chaoyang Zhao, Qiang Liu, and Liang Wang. Genpilot: A multi-agent system for test-time prompt optimization in image generation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07217. 15

    2025

  27. [35]

    Worldgenbench: A world-knowledge-integrated benchmark for reasoning-driven text-to-image generation, 2025

    Daoan Zhang, Che Jiang, Ruoshi Xu, Biaoxiang Chen, Zijian Jin, Yutian Lu, Jianguo Zhang, Liang Yong, Jiebo Luo, and Shengda Luo. Worldgenbench: A world-knowledge-integrated benchmark for reasoning-driven text-to-image generation, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01490

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Qwen-image-agent: Bridging the context gap in real-world image generation, 2026

    Zekai Zhang, Jiahao Li, Jie Zhang, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Lihan Jiang, Ningyuan Tang, Shengming Yin, Tianhe Wu, Xiaoyue Chen, Xiao Xu, Yan Shu, Yanran Zhang, Yixian Xu, Yuxiang Chen, Zhendong Wang, Zihao Liu, Zikai Zhou, Huishuai Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, and Chenfei Wu. Qwen-image-...

    2026 arXiv

  29. [37]

    ""You are a

    Jiahao Zhao, Shaoxuan Xu, Zhongxiang Sun, Fengqi Zhu, Jingyang Ou, Yuling Shi, Chongxuan Li, Xiao Zhang, and Jun Xu. Dllm-searcher: Adapting diffusion large language model for search agents, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07035. 16 A Appendix This appendix provides addit...

    2026

  30. [39]

    Only keep facts, data, or opinions that are truly relevant to the query; remove unrelated content

  31. [40]

    according to the document

    Present the information in compact bullet points or short paragraphs. Do not use pleasantries, restate the query, or include filler phrases such as “according to the document”

  32. [41]

    If the document contains no relevant information at all, output only NO_RELEVANT_INFO

  33. [42]

    Avoid being overly vague

    Preserve specific information from the original text, such as key numbers, names, times, and sources. Avoid being overly vague

  34. [43]

    name": "text_search

    Answer in the same language as the query. Template fields: [query] {query} and [document content] {doc}. The reader directly outputs the condensed and organized information. A.2 Comparisons The following four cases are selected from the top-ranked WorldGenBench-Humanities exam...

    1975

  35. [2026]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23500

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.