Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 34 references

Effect of Cross-Spectral Correlations on Qubit Dynamics: Coherence Revival and Relaxation Modulation

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Noise cross-correlations revive qubit coherence and slow relaxation

desk verdict Clean TCL2 derivation and a plausible cross-correlation mechanism, but the coherence-revival claim lacks the required positivity check in the very parameter regime where the paper admits TCL2 may fail. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04672 v1 pith:JCEQWUPZ submitted 2026-08-05 quant-ph

Siddhartha Dutta , Sujay Mondal , Abhijit Bandyopadhyay This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81S2281P68 PACS 03.65.Yz03.67.-a
keywords cross-spectralcorrelationsqubitdecoherenceTCL2masterequationcoherencerevivalrelaxationmodulationspectraldensitymatrixspin-bosonmodeldephasing-relaxationcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether environmental noise that acts on a qubit through two distinct channels—one that dephases it and one that relaxes it—can change the qubit's dynamics when the two noise sources are correlated because they come from the same bath. Within a second-order time-convolutionless master equation, the authors show that the complex off-diagonal element of the bath spectral density couples the dephasing and relaxation sectors, so the combined effect is not the sum of two independent channels. The central result is that this coupling can produce a transient revival of the qubit's $\ell^1$-norm coherence after its initial decay and a non-monotonic modulation of population relaxation. The magnitude, timing, and even sign of these effects are controlled by the strength, bandwidth, phase, and delay of the cross spectrum. A sympathetic reader would care because correlated multi-axis noise is common in solid-state qubits, and the paper suggests finite windows of enhanced coherence or suppressed relaxation within the weak-coupling regime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the matrix-valued spectral density $J(\omega)$, whose diagonal elements $J_{xx}(\omega)$ and $J_{zz}(\omega)$ describe relaxation and dephasing noise, and whose off-diagonal element $J_{xz}(\omega)$ encodes cross-spectral correlations. Positive semidefiniteness bounds the cross spectrum by $|J_{xz}(\omega)| \le \sqrt{J_{xx}(\omega)J_{zz}(\omega)}$, and the paper parametrizes it as $J_{xz}(\omega) = \sqrt{J_{xx}J_{zz}}\,\gamma_0 e^{-\omega/\omega_c} e^{i(\omega\tau+\phi)}$ with correlation strength $\gamma_0$, bandwidth $\omega_c$, delay $\tau$, and phase $\phi$. This cross term enters the TCL2 generator $M(t)$ and inhomogeneity $K(t)$ in equations (28)–(31), coupling the dephasing and relaxation sectors through terms like $M_{xz}(t)$, $M_{zx}(t)$, and $K_x(t)$, $K_y(t)$. The mechanism is the interference between the two noise channels, whose relative phase determines whether the correlated contribution enhances or suppresses coherence.

What would settle it

Compute, for the parameter sets of Figs. 3–8, the Bloch-vector norm and the eigenvalues of $\rho(t)$ at every time step; if the TCL2 solution violates positivity precisely during the intervals where $\Delta C(t) > 0$, the revival is an artifact of the second-order truncation. Alternatively, compare the TCL2 result against a nonperturbative solution, such as a hierarchy-of-motions or path-integral method, for the same $J_{xx}$, $J_{zz}$, and $J_{xz}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a qubit coupled to a common bosonic bath through both $\sigma_x \otimes B_x$ and $\sigma_z \otimes B_z$, with a Hermitian positive-semidefinite spectral density matrix whose off-diagonal element $J_{xz}(\omega)$ is nonzero, obeys a TCL2 Bloch-vector equation whose generator contains cross terms linking the longitudinal and transverse sectors. These cross terms produce qualitative features absent from independent-channel dynamics: the population inversion $\langle\sigma_z\rangle_t$ becomes non-monotonic, and the $\ell^1$-norm coherence $C(t) = \sqrt{\langle\sigma_x\rangle_t^2 + \langle\sigma_y\rangle_t^2}$ can rise again after decaying, with the enhancement controlled by the cross-spectral parameters. The paper validates the numerics against the exact pure-dephasing solution and the qualitative Ohmicity dependence of the transverse spin-boson model, and it cautions that a coherence revival does not by itself establish information backflow or non-Markovianity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the second-order time-convolutionless approximation stays quantitatively accurate over the revival window, since the paper notes its own solution can exceed the physically allowed population range without an explicit positivity check for the plotted parameters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a correlated environment, the combined dephasing and relaxation cannot be predicted from the individual channels' rates; the cross-spectral terms must be retained.
  • Varying the cross-spectral strength $\gamma_0$ and bandwidth $\omega_c$ controls the size of the coherence-revival window, while the delay $\tau$ and phase $\phi$ control when and whether the revival appears.
  • Where $\Delta C(t) > 0$, the quantum Fisher information for phase estimation, $F_Q = C^2$, is higher than in the uncorrelated environment, so the revival window is also a sensitivity-enhanced sensing window.
  • The revivals do not by themselves certify non-Markovianity or information backflow; those require separate measures, as the paper explicitly notes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cross-spectral coupling mechanism should appear in any multi-axis open-system model with non-commuting coupling operators, so similar revivals might be engineered in multi-qubit or multimode settings where two noise operators share a common reservoir.
  • Because the paper's TCL2 solution can violate positivity, a natural test is to re-solve the same spectral densities with a nonperturbative method; if the revival survives positivity enforcement, it is physical, not a perturbative artifact.
  • The parametrization suggests an experimental route: by spectrally filtering a common reservoir and controlling the relative phase of two couplings, one could place the coherence-enhancement window at a desired sensing time.
  • One could extend the analysis to non-Ohmic structured baths, such as Lorentzian peaks, where the frequency selectivity of cross correlations might amplify or sharpen the revival.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a single qubit coupled to a common bosonic environment through sigma_x and sigma_z operators, encoded in a Hermitian positive-semidefinite spectral density matrix whose off-diagonal entries are complex cross-spectra. Using the second-order time-convolutionless (TCL2) projection technique, the authors derive time-local Bloch-vector equations (Eq. (28)) with explicit generator matrices M(t) and K(t) (Eqs. (29)-(31)). The pure-dephasing sector is benchmarked against the exact analytic solution, and the transverse-only limit is compared qualitatively with Ref. [19]. The main results are that, for fixed diagonal spectra, nonzero cross-spectral correlations couple the dephasing and relaxation sectors and produce non-monotonic population relaxation and a transient l1-norm coherence revival, tunable through the parameters gamma_0, omega_c, tau, phi, and beta (Figs. 3-8). The paper carefully distinguishes these effects from information backflow and from operational quantum advantages.

Significance. If the reported coherence revival is physical, the paper provides a useful unified framework for correlated multi-axis noise: it derives closed analytic expressions for the TCL2 generator including cross terms, respects the positivity constraint |J_xz|^2 <= J_xx J_zz, and uses comparisons in which only the off-diagonal spectra are switched on while the diagonal spectra remain fixed. The exact pure-dephasing benchmark and the transparent separation of coherent rotation, damping, and nonunital drift are strengths. The central caveat is that the headline effect is demonstrated only within a second-order perturbative approximation whose positivity is not checked in the reported parameter regimes; the operational discussion in Sec. 8 is, however, appropriately hedged. The significance is therefore real but conditional on establishing that the revivals survive a positivity or nonperturbative test.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 7, Figs. 3-8] The central claim of a coherence revival and non-monotonic relaxation rests entirely on the TCL2 Bloch-vector solutions, but the paper itself states in Sec. 7 that an overshoot of <sigma_z>_t beyond the physically allowed range indicates a loss of positivity of the TCL2 solution and that the parameter set must be checked by monitoring the eigenvalues of rho(t) and the Bloch-vector norm. No such check is reported for the parameter sets used in Figs. 3-8. Because the TCL2 generator is a second-order truncation and need not be completely positive, the cross terms that produce the revival could be the same terms that drive the Bloch radius above unity. Please report min(lambda(rho(t))) and the Bloch-vector norm for the headline parameter sets, and ideally verify the revival with a nonperturbative method or at a smaller coupling where truncation error is controlled.
  2. [Sec. 6, Fig. 2] The transverse sector is validated only qualitatively against Ref. [19], while the exact benchmark of Fig. 1 tests only the diagonal longitudinal channel. Neither test directly constrains the cross-spectral terms, which are the source of the reported revivals. Please add an independent check of the correlated case, for example a comparison with a numerically exact method such as HEOM or a stochastic Liouville equation for a simple cross-spectral model, or at minimum a limit in which the cross-term contribution can be solved exactly. Without such a check, the possibility that the revival is a TCL2 truncation artifact remains open.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (33)] The second inequality should read J_zz(omega) >= 0 rather than J_yy(omega) >= 0, since the model has only x and z channels.
  2. [Sec. 7, after Eq. (55)] The default value of the cross-spectral cutoff is missing: the text reads 'omega_c = . . .' and should specify a concrete value, presumably omega_c = 5.
  3. [Fig. 1 and Sec. 6] There is an inconsistency between the Fig. 1 legend, which includes s = 3.0, and the text, which states s_z = 0.5 and 1.0; the phrase 's_z = (0.5 and 1,0)' is garbled.
  4. [Sec. 6, initial state paragraph] The sentence '<sigma_x>_0 = 1, <sigma_y>_0 = 0, <sigma_z>_0 = 0' is repeated immediately after Eq. (43).
  5. [Sec. 6, pure-dephasing benchmark paragraph] The text 'we numerically compute <sigma_x>_t and <sigma_x>_t' should read '<sigma_x>_t and <sigma_y>_t'.
  6. [Eq. (13) and Eq. (10)] In Eq. (13) the integrand should be S_alpha beta(omega), not S_alpha beta(t), and in Eq. (10) the condition 'omega >=' is incomplete and should read 'omega >= 0'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected: the correlated dynamics is computed from the chosen spectral-density inputs with no fitting or self-citation chain, and the reported revivals are genuine dynamical outputs.

full rationale

The paper derives the TCL2 Bloch-vector equations (Eqs. 28–31) from a microscopic system–bath Hamiltonian using a standard second-order time-convolutionless expansion; the derivation is self-contained given the stated Born and weak-coupling assumptions. The cross-spectral density J_xz(ω) = sqrt(J_xx(ω)J_zz(ω)) γ(ω) is chosen as an input, not fitted to the coherence or population outputs, and the reported coherence revival and non-monotonic ⟨σ_z⟩ are obtained by numerically integrating the resulting closed equations for fixed parameter values. The claim that correlated dynamics cannot be reproduced by adding independent channels is a direct consequence of the presence of the cross terms in M(t) and K(t), which are nonzero by construction when γ(ω) ≠ 0, but this is an analytic property of the model rather than a circular reduction of the prediction to the input. The benchmarks in Sec. 6 validate the numerical implementation against the exact pure-dephasing solution and a qualitatively established spin-boson result, and the paper does not invoke uniqueness theorems or load-bearing self-citations. The Sec. 7 caveat about TCL2 positivity and possible overshoot of ⟨σ_z⟩ is a correctness/approximation concern, not a circularity concern, because the revival claim is not asserted by definition or recovered by fitting; it is a computed consequence whose physical interpretation may require an independent positivity check. No circular step satisfying the required standards could be identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard open quantum system assumptions (weak coupling, Born approximation, factorized initial state, Gaussian bath) and on a phenomenological parametrization of the cross-spectral density with four free parameters (γ0, ωc, τ, φ). No new physical entities are introduced. The TCL2 approximation validity is the most fragile assumption, as the paper itself notes possible positivity violations.

free parameters (5)
  • γ0 (cross-correlation strength) = 1.0 (varied 0.2 to 1.0)
    Sets the magnitude of J_xz(ω) via Eq. (37); directly controls the size of the coherence revival and relaxation suppression.
  • ωc (cross-spectral cutoff) = 5 (varied 1, 5, 10)
    Frequency scale beyond which γ(ω) decays exponentially; controls the bandwidth over which channels are correlated.
  • τ (relative time delay) = 2 (varied 0, 2, 4)
    Linear phase coefficient in θ(ω)=ωτ+φ; shifts the phase of cross-spectral terms and can reverse the sign of effects.
  • φ (phase offset) = 0 (varied -π/2, 0, π/2)
    Constant phase in γ(ω); determines constructive vs destructive interference between channels.
  • Auto-spectral parameters (η_x, η_z, s_x, s_z, ω_cx, ω_cz) = η_x=η_z=0.05, s_x=s_z=1, ω_cx=ω_cz=5
    Define the diagonal noise spectra J_xx and J_zz in Eq. (39); fixed across correlated/uncorrelated comparisons.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Born approximation and weak coupling: TCL2 expansion truncated at second order in the system-bath coupling.
    Used in Sec. 3 to derive Eq. (21); requires the coupling and noise strengths to be small so that O(γ^3) terms can be neglected.
  • domain assumption Factorized initial state with stationary thermal bath.
    Assumed in Sec. 3; needed to drop the linear term in γ and to write ρ_tot(t) ≈ ρ(t)⊗ρ_B.
  • domain assumption Bath correlations are Gaussian; higher-order cumulants vanish at second order.
    Only two-point correlation functions enter Eq. (19); linear bosonic coupling ensures this at second order.
  • standard math Spectral density matrix is positive semidefinite, so |J_xz(ω)|^2 ≤ J_xx(ω) J_zz(ω).
    Follows from Eq. (11) as a sum of outer products; used to parametrize J_xz via γ(ω) with |γ(ω)|≤1.
  • ad hoc to paper Ohmic form with exponential cutoff for the auto-spectral densities.
    Eq. (39) is adopted without microscopic derivation; it is a standard but chosen model for broadband environments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of Cross-Spectral Correlations on Qubit Dynamics: Coherence Revival and Relaxation Modulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JCEQWUPZ

@misc{pith2026260804672,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of Cross-Spectral Correlations on Qubit Dynamics: Coherence Revival and Relaxation Modulation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JCEQWUPZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04672}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the reduced dynamics of a qubit subject to correlated longitudinal and transverse noise arising from its coupling to a shared bosonic bath. The environmental fluctuations are characterized by a positive-semidefinite matrix-valued spectral density, whose complex off-diagonal elements encode correlations between dephasing and relaxation channels in the frequency domain. Within the second-order time-convolutionless framework, we derive closed time-local equations for the Bloch-vector components of the reduced density matrix. The numerical implementation is validated against the exact pure-dephasing solution and the established behavior of the transverse-coupling spin-boson model. When both noise channels are present, the cross-spectral terms couple the otherwise distinct dephasing and relaxation sectors, producing dynamics that cannot be reproduced by adding independent noise contributions. In particular, the correlations generate non-monotonic population relaxation and a transient revival of coherence following its initial decay. The strength, bandwidth, delay, and phase of the cross spectrum provide control parameters for the magnitude and temporal structure of these effects. Our results demonstrate that correlated multi-axis noise can redistribute coherence loss and energy relaxation in time, thereby providing finite temporal windows of enhanced coherence or suppressed relaxation within the weak-coupling regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04672 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Benchmarking against the exactly solvable pure-dephasing model: Temporal profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Benchmarking the pure dissipation sector. Temporal evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Temporal evolution of the Bloch-vector components of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temporal evolution of ∆C(t) (left panel) and ∆⟨σz⟩t (right panel) for representative cross-correlation strengths γ0 = 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0. The remaining cross-spectral parameters are fixed at ωc = 5, τ = 2 and ϕ = 0, with inverse temperature β = 40. The diagonal spectral…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temporal evolution of ∆C(t) (left panel) and ∆⟨σz⟩t (right panel) for representative values of the cross-spectral cutoff frequency, ωc = 1, 5, and 10. The remaining cross-spectral parameters are fixed at γ0 = 1, τ = 2 and ϕ = 0, with inverse temperature β = 40. The dia…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Temporal evolution of ∆C(t) (left panel) and ∆⟨σz⟩t (right panel) for representative values relative time delay, τ = 0, 2, and 4 between the two correlated noise channels. The remaining cross-spectral parameters are fixed at γ0 = 1, ωc = 5 and ϕ = 0, with inverse tempe…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Temporal evolution of ∆C(t) (left panel) and ∆⟨σz⟩t (right panel) for different frequency-independent phase offsets ϕ = −π/2, 0, π/2 between the two correlated noise chan￾nels. The remaining cross-spectral parameters are fixed at γ0 = 1, τ = 2 and ωc = 5, with inverse …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Temporal evolution of ∆C(t) (left panel) and ∆⟨σz⟩t (right panel) for different inverse temperatures. The cross-spectral parameters are fixed at γ0 = 1, τ = 2 and ωc = 5, ϕ = 0. The diagonal spectral-density parameters are ηx = ηz = 0.05, sx = sz = 1, and ωcx = ωcz = 5…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    J. Barr, G. Zicari, A. Ferraro and M. Paternostro, Spectral density classification for environment spectroscopy,Machine Learning: Science and Technology5(2024) 015043

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002

    2002

  3. [2]

    Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems

    U. Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems. World Scientific, Singapore, 4 ed., 2012. 25

    work page 2012

  4. [3]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction. Springer, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [4]

    Makhlin, G

    Y. Makhlin, G. Sch¨ on and A. Shnirman, Quantum-state engineering with josephson-junction devices,Reviews of Modern Physics73(2001) 357–400

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    Ithier, E

    G. Ithier, E. Collin, P. Joyez, P. J. Meeson, D. Vion, D. Esteve et al., Decoherence in a superconducting quantum bit circuit,Physical Review B72(2005) 134519

    work page 2005

  7. [6]

    Paladino, Y

    E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci and B. L. Altshuler, 1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information,Rev. Mod. Phys.86(2014) 361–418

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,Reviews of Modern Physics82(2010) 1155–1208

    work page 2010

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    W. M. Witzel and S. Das Sarma, Quantum theory for electron spin decoherence induced by nuclear spin dynamics,Physical Review B74(2006) 035322

    2006

  2. [9]

    Krummheuer, V

    B. Krummheuer, V. M. Axt and T. Kuhn, Theory of pure dephasing and the resulting absorption line shape in semiconductor quantum dots,Physical Review B65(2002) 195313

    2002

  3. [10]

    D. P. S. McCutcheon and A. Nazir, Quantum dot Rabi rotations beyond the weak exciton–phonon coupling regime,New Journal of Physics12(2010) 113042

    2010

  4. [11]

    Nazir and G

    A. Nazir and G. Schaller, The reaction coordinate mapping in quantum thermodynamics, inThermodynamics in the Quantum Regime(F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders and G. Adesso, eds.), pp. 551–577. Springer, Cham, 2018

    2018

  5. [12]

    G. M. Palma, K.-A. Suominen and A. K. Ekert, Quantum computers and dissipation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences452(1996) 567–584

    1996

  6. [13]

    Ficek and R

    Z. Ficek and R. Tana´ s, Entangled states and collective nonclassical effects in two-atom systems,Physics Reports372(2002) 369–443

    2002

  7. [14]

    Jeske and J

    J. Jeske and J. H. Cole, Derivation of markovian master equations for spatially correlated decoherence,Physical Review A87(2013) 052138

    2013

  8. [15]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system,Rev. Mod. Phys.59(1987) 1–85

    1987

  9. [16]

    B. M. Garraway, Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity,Physical Review A55(1997) 2290–2303

    1997

  10. [17]

    Mazzola, S

    L. Mazzola, S. Maniscalco, J. Piilo, K.-A. Suominen and B. M. Garraway, Pseudomodes as an effective description of memory: Non-markovian dynamics of two-state systems in structured reservoirs,Physical Review A80(2009) 012104

    2009

  11. [18]

    Pleasance, B

    G. Pleasance, B. M. Garraway and F. Petruccione, Generalized theory of pseudomodes for exact descriptions of non-markovian quantum processes,Physical Review Research 2(2020) 043058. 26

    2020

  12. [20]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system,Annals of Physics149(1983) 374–456

    1983

  13. [21]

    A. W. Chin, J. Prior, R. Rosenbach, F. Caycedo-Soler, S. F. Huelga and M. B. Plenio, The role of nonequilibrium vibrational structures in electronic coherence and recoherence in pigment–protein complexes,Nature Physics9(2013) 113–118

    2013

  14. [22]

    Baumgratz, M

    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio, Quantifying coherence,Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(2014) 140401

    2014

  15. [23]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 3439–3443

    1994

  16. [24]

    M. G. A. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum technology,Int. J. Quantum Inf.7 (2009) 125–137

    2009

  17. [25]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries,Phys. Rev. E87(2013) 042123

    2013

  18. [26]

    Campaioli, F

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C´ eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy et al., Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 150601

    2017

  19. [27]

    Ferraro, M

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V. Pellegrini and M. Polini, High-power collective charging of a solid-state quantum battery,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 117702

    2018

  20. [28]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum reservoir engineering with laser cooled trapped ions,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 4728–4731

    1996

  21. [29]

    K. W. Murch, U. Vool, D. Zhou, S. J. Weber, S. M. Girvin and I. Siddiqi, Cavity-assisted quantum bath engineering,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 183602

    2012

  22. [30]

    Y. Lin, J. P. Gaebler, F. Reiter, T. R. Tan, R. Bowler, A. S. Sørensen et al., Dissipative production of a maximally entangled steady state of two quantum bits,Nature504 (2013) 415–418

    2013

  23. [31]

    Shankar, M

    S. Shankar, M. Hatridge, Z. Leghtas, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, U. Vool et al., Autonomously stabilized entanglement between two superconducting quantum bits, Nature504(2013) 419–422

    2013

  24. [32]

    Kronwald, F

    A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt and A. A. Clerk, Arbitrarily large steady-state bosonic squeezing via dissipation,Physical Review A88(2013) 063833

    2013

  25. [33]

    A. F. Kockum, P. Delsing and G. Johansson, Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom,Physical Review A90(2014) 013837

    2014

  26. [34]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering,Physical Review X5(2015) 021025. 27

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.