Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Thermal Alignment as a Pathway to Axion Dark Matter

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Thermal alignment fixes the late axion state as a full phase-space distribution, not just a homogeneous displacement.

desk verdict The phase-space bound and the gauge construction are worth engaging, but the abundance calculation ignores the fluctuation energy that is the paper's own subject, so the central dark-matter claim is not yet supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04990 v1 pith:BSI7TABA submitted 2026-08-05 hep-ph

Imtiaz Khan , G. Mustafa , Chengxun Yuan , Farkhod Botirov , Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov , Farruh Atamurotov This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords axiondarkmatterthermalalignmentphase-spacecovariancefluctuation-dissipationrelationisocurvaturespectrumChern-Simonsdiffusionfinite-temperaturegaugetheorycosmologicalphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that when a thermal bath erases an axion's initial misalignment, it does not leave the axion with a new homogeneous angle alone; the same interaction prepares a spread of field and momentum fluctuations. The central claim is that the late axion state is a complete phase-space distribution, and a fluctuation-dissipation bound makes memory loss and stochastic preparation two aspects of one covariance map: the more completely the incoming state is forgotten, the larger the injected covariance must be. The paper constructs a renormalizable finite-temperature gauge theory whose single scalar transition simultaneously switches off the temporary axion curvature, terminates the Chern-Simons bath, and activates the stable late potential, then solves the coupled mean and covariance evolution through that wall. If the construction is right, axion dark matter inherits a calculable infrared ($k^3$) isocurvature spectrum from thermal correlation rather than from inflationary initial conditions, with turnover amplitude $\Delta^2_{Sa}(k_\star)\simeq 0.15$ at a microscopic scale.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the matrix Lyapunov equation for each Fourier mode, $\dot{C}_k = A_k C_k + C_k A_k^T + N_k$, with $A_k$ the inertial drift matrix and $N_k$ the noise kernel fixed by fluctuation-dissipation balance. Its solution is the affine map $C_{k,f} = U_k C_{k,i} U_k^T + W_k$, where $U_k = \exp(A_k\Delta t)$ and $W_k$ is the controllability Gramian; the paper's Theorem 1 packages this as the memory-noise bound $W_k \succeq (1-\varepsilon_{2,k}^2)\Sigma_k$. The microscopic support is an $SU(2)_h \times SU(3)_\ell$ gauge theory whose one scalar transition exchanges the high-temperature topological susceptibility and Chern-Simons bath for the low-temperature confining susceptibility, correlating the temporary potential, the noise source, and the late stable potential in a single vacuum structure.

What would settle it

Compute the full released energy density by integrating the final phase-space spectrum $P_A(k)$ over all momenta and compare it with $\rho_{\rm DM}/s$; if the fluctuation energy is a non-negligible fraction of the coherent contribution at the turnover scale, the $\delta_{\rm DM}=6.044\times10^{-8}$ normalization overproduces dark matter and the coherent-dominated calculation would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the covariance map of every damped Fourier mode: the final covariance splits into a propagated memory term $U_k C_{k,i} U_k^T$ and an injected controllability Gramian $W_k = \Sigma_k - U_k \Sigma_k U_k^T$, with $W_k \succeq (1-\varepsilon_{2,k}^2)\Sigma_k$. Consequently the released phase-space covariance always contains at least the fraction $1-\varepsilon_{2,k}^2$ of the stationary thermal covariance in every direction, and the determinant bound $\det C_{k,f} \ge (1-\varepsilon_{2,k}^2)^2 \det \Sigma_k$ protects the classical phase-space volume. In the overdamped spatial projection the injected spectrum is a completely monotone Laplace transform, yielding a white-noise infrared $k^3$ law, and the zero-mode susceptibility identity $P_0 k_\star^2 = rT/(a f_a^2)$ links the spectrum's amplitude to its turnover scale. This is why thermal alignment is claimed to be calculable: the late oscillator's initial condition is determined by the release map of the finite-temperature theory, not by a hand-picked angle.

Load-bearing premise

The relic abundance is matched using only the homogeneous mean displacement, so the energy carried by the thermal fluctuations the paper itself derives is assumed not to alter the normalization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The light axion's late state is a Gaussian phase-space distribution with a calculable covariance; mean displacement and fluctuation energy are both part of the dark-matter initial condition.
  • The released isocurvature spectrum rises as $k^3$ in the infrared and is negligible at CMB scales: $\Delta^2_{Sa}(0.05\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}) \simeq 3.95\times 10^{-56}$, far below the Planck isocurvature bound.
  • The spectrum turns over at $k_\star \simeq 7.79\times 10^{16}\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ with $\Delta^2_{Sa}(k_\star) \simeq 0.15$, so the density contrast is linear at the turnover and becomes nonlinear only at shorter wavelengths.
  • The microscopic transition is first order with benchmark $T_\star \simeq 9.384\times 10^5$ GeV, and the same thermal history produces a gravitational-wave signal at $f_{sw} \simeq 1.45$ kHz with $h^2\Omega_{sw} \simeq 2.8\times 10^{-16}$.
  • Bath locality holds across the derived hierarchy: the finite-memory parameter $\tau_b\lambda_- \simeq 4.35\times 10^{-8}$ reproduces the white-noise limit, and wall-duration tests place the benchmark deep inside the sudden-release regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the paper fixes $\delta_{\rm DM}$ from the homogeneous mean alone; a direct check would integrate the full released energy from $P_A(k)$ and ask whether the fluctuation contribution shifts the required displacement.
  • Editorial extension: the same covariance bound applies to any scalar in a thermal bath, so it could serve as a general lower bound on stochastically prepared initial conditions for axion-like particles and other light fields.
  • Editorial extension: the $k^3$ turnover is a sharp discriminator between thermal and inflationary origins; a future small-scale probe sensitive to isocurvature near $k_\star$ could test the predicted amplitude directly.
  • Editorial extension: the stationary covariance in Eq. (33) is mode-summed up to an unspecified ultraviolet scale; specifying that cutoff would determine how much of the quoted $\Delta^2_{Sa}(k_\star)$ depends on the bath's high-momentum population.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism called thermal alignment for axion dark matter, in which a dissipative finite-temperature bath simultaneously erases an initial homogeneous axion displacement and prepares stochastic field and momentum fluctuations. The authors construct a renormalizable SU(2)_h x SU(3)_l gauge theory intended to realize the required phase exchange: the high-temperature phase generates a temporary axion susceptibility and a Chern-Simons damping bath, and a first-order scalar transition terminates the bath while turning on the stable low-temperature axion potential. The central formal result is Theorem 1, a matrix inequality bounding the covariance injected by the bath in terms of the memory loss of the initial state, together with an overdamped spatial projection giving a completely monotone field spectrum and a causal k^3 infrared law. The authors then solve the coupled mean and covariance evolution across the transition, quote an alignment depth N0 = 368.29, normalize the homogeneous displacement to the observed dark matter density in Eq. (50), and present a late isocurvature spectrum with Delta^2_Sa(k_*) = 1.497e-1 at k_* = 7.79e16 Mpc^-1.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would be a valuable contribution: it connects a microscopic gauge theory to a state-based, rather than mean-only, treatment of thermal axion production, and it contains a clean covariance inequality and an explicit causal infrared spectrum. The algebraic derivation of Theorem 1, the complete monotonicity argument for P_th(k), and the numerical consistency checks (e.g., Eq. C1) are real strengths. However, the paper does not compute the total energy density of the released phase-space state. The abundance result is normalized to the homogeneous mode only, and the local bath is used without a stated ultraviolet cutoff. These omissions directly affect the central claim that the full phase-space distribution is captured as dark matter, so the mechanism as presented is not yet supported by the calculation.

major comments (3)
  1. [V, Eqs. (50)-(54)] The abundance calculation uses only the homogeneous displacement. Equation (50) sets rho_a/s from delta_DM alone, while Eq. (52) explicitly states that the released oscillator energy depends on C_thetadot_thetadot as well as C_theta_theta. Since Eq. (54) reports Delta^2_Sa(k_*) = 1.497e-1, the fluctuation variance is of order 0.15 per log interval at the turnover and cannot be treated as a negligible correction. The paper never integrates the phase-space covariance (52) over k to obtain the total energy density, so the assertion that the microscopic realization yields the observed dark matter abundance is unsupported.
  2. [IV, Eq. (33)] The stationary covariance in Eq. (33) has a k-independent velocity variance, rT/(a^3 f_a^2), and a field variance proportional to (m^2 + k^2/a^2)^{-1}. Substituted into Eq. (52), the oscillator energy density receives a velocity-covariance contribution that grows linearly with the ultraviolet cutoff and a field-covariance contribution that is logarithmically divergent unless a cutoff is imposed. No such cutoff is specified anywhere, despite the microscopic theory containing scales such as T_* and alpha_h T_*. The 'calculable late axion state' is therefore not a calculable energy density as written; the quoted spectrum and abundance are cutoff-dependent.
  3. [V, Eq. (51)] Equation (51) fixes delta_DM = 6.044e-8 by requiring the coherent contribution to match rho_DM/s. Because the fluctuation contribution is omitted, this is a normalization to the observed abundance rather than a prediction of the mechanism, and the resulting delta_DM cannot be interpreted as the total dark matter displacement. The benchmark parameters in Eq. (14) are selected to realize the phase exchange; the abundance agreement therefore demonstrates internal consistency of a tuned benchmark, not a parameter-independent success.
minor comments (5)
  1. [IV, Eq. (34)] The operator norm used to define epsilon_{2,k} is not defined before its first use; please state the norm explicitly.
  2. [II.B, Eq. (21)] The envelope reports N0 >= 259.57, while Eq. (48) gives N0 = 368.29 for the reference point; the text should clarify that these are distinct quantities, namely a minimum over the transition interval versus the reference benchmark value.
  3. [II.A, Eq. (23)] The axion decay constant f_a is only implicit through the relation m_h = sqrt(chi_h)/f_a; stating its numerical value would make the normalization in Eq. (50) more transparent.
  4. [VI.A, Fig. 5(b)] The table inside Fig. 5(b) lists numbers without row or column labels; please identify the axes and entries in the caption.
  5. [References] Reference [15] is formatted inconsistently with the other bibliography entries; the author list should be completed or normalized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the covariance bound and gauge-theory realization are derived in-text from the Langevin equation and external instanton/chiral results; δ_DM is a transparent abundance calibration, not a fitted prediction disguised as output.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The full phase-space preparation bound (Theorem 1, Eqs. (30)-(37)) follows directly from the inertial Langevin equation and the fluctuation-dissipation kernel N_k, giving C_k,f ≥ (1-ε²_k)Σ_k with no fitted input. The spatial projection in Eqs. (38)-(43) derives the completely monotone spectrum and k^3 infrared law from positivity of the noise kernel, with external consistency checks. The microscopic realization in Eqs. (22)-(29) uses standard instanton, Di Vecchia-Veneziano, and Leutwyler-Smilga results to map the scalar transition to χ_h, Γ_CS, and χ_ℓ; the wall profile in Eq. (44) is an explicit ansatz, not smuggled via citation. The mean and covariance are evolved in Eqs. (45)-(46) and cross-checked numerically. The only abundance input is δ_DM in Eq. (51), fixed by requiring ρ_DM/s=0.44 eV; Eq. (53) then uses this same δ_DM² to normalize the isocurvature spectrum. This is a standard abundance calibration and a conditional prediction, not a circular reduction, because the thermal covariance P_A(k) is computed independently. The paper's phrase 'yields the observed abundance' overstates the result, and the failure to integrate the covariance energy into the total density is a completeness/correctness concern rather than circularity. Self-citations (Refs. [15], [36], [37], [45]) are contextual and not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citations and the calibration caveat, not an identified circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard stochastic calculus and thermal field theory, plus a set of tuned benchmark parameters and the unchecked coherent-dominated abundance assumption. No new entities with independent evidence are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Benchmark couplings and masses (Eq. 14) = lambda_S=lambda_X=0.50, lambda_R=lambda_H=0.05, kappa_SR=1.50, kappa_SH=1.00, kappa_SX=0.44167, N_X=36, y_q=0.25…
    Chosen to make c_S<0, a first-order phase exchange, and the desired susceptibility hierarchy; no independent experimental constraint.
  • Chern-Simons normalization kappa_CS = 40 (reference; varied from 0.3 to 3)
    Normalization of Gamma_sym = kappa_CS alpha_h^5 T^4; taken from a literature range but the central value is a choice.
  • Coherent displacement delta_DM = 6.044e-8
    Fixed by demanding Eq. (50) matches the observed rho_DM/s; it is an abundance normalization, not a prediction.
  • Axion decay constant f_a = about 1e9 GeV (inferred)
    Implied by chi_h and m_h in Eq. (23); not stated as an input but it sets all mass scales.
  • Transition degeneracy temperature T0 = 1e6 GeV
    Scale at which the high and low scalar branches are degenerate; chosen by hand.
  • Confinement scale Lambda_l = 3 T0
    Chosen so SU(3)_l is confined before capture; controls ma(0)=3.618 TeV.
  • Sphaleron barrier parameter B = 1.56
    Standard literature value for the broken-phase suppression exponent, adopted without recalculation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Local low-frequency limit: Chern-Simons damping and noise are momentum independent and white for all Fourier modes (Eqs. 25, 30, 31).
    Required for the stationary covariance (33) and spectrum (42); real-time rates are momentum dependent (see [12]), and no UV cutoff is specified, so high-momentum modes are thermalized in the model.
  • domain assumption Dilute instanton gas formula (22) with b0=6, A=2, C2=0.466 e^-3.358 applies at alpha_h=0.25.
    This is a weak-coupling semi-classical susceptibility; alpha_h=0.25 is not deep in the weak-coupling regime.
  • ad hoc to paper Constrained field-space path upper bounds the true bounce, and S3/T=140 sets T* (Eqs. 19-20).
    The transition timing interval rests on this criterion; it is not a full multi-field bounce calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper Coherent-dominated abundance: Eq. (50) assigns the full observed DM density to the mean delta_DM, ignoring energy in the covariance.
    The paper never computes the integrated fluctuation energy; without it the abundance normalization and Delta^2_Sa(k_*) may be invalid.
  • domain assumption Symmetry nonrestoration via an O(N_X=36) spectator with a negative S-X portal yields c_S<0.
    Relies on large spectator multiplicity and specific quartic signs; boundedness condition (6) is satisfied but the construction is tuned.
  • standard math Standard thermal field theory identities: Lyapunov equation, fluctuation-dissipation, chiral Ward identity, and Leutwyler-Smilga relation.
    Background results used without proof; accepted in the literature.
invented entities (3)
  • Hidden SU(2)_h gauge sector with quarks, Higgs doublet H, and singlet S
    purpose: Provides the high-temperature axion susceptibility and the Chern-Simons friction bath.
    No direct collider or astrophysical handle; the gravitational wave signal is far too weak for current detectors.
  • Hidden SU(3)_l confining sector with quarks and singlet R
    purpose: Provides the stable late axion potential and captures the released phase space distribution.
    The confinement scale is chosen by hand and the sector is otherwise unobservable in the paper.
  • O(N_X=36) spectator scalar multiplet X_A
    purpose: Generates c_S<0 through the negative S-X portal, producing symmetry nonrestoration at high temperature.
    A large tuned spectator sector with no independent experimental signature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal Alignment as a Pathway to Axion Dark Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BSI7TABA

@misc{pith2026260804990,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal Alignment as a Pathway to Axion Dark Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BSI7TABA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04990}
}
read the original abstract

Thermal alignment cannot be inferred from the axion mean alone because the dissipative bath that erases the initial displacement also prepares field and momentum fluctuations. We derive a phase space covariance bound that quantifies this memory and noise relation in the full inertial Langevin system. A renormalizable finite temperature gauge theory then links the temporary susceptibility, the Chern-Simons bath, bath termination, and the stable late potential through one scalar transition. Solving the coupled mean and covariance evolution demonstrates erasure of the incoming state, release of a causal infrared spectrum, and capture of the full phase space distribution as axion dark matter across the transition interval. Thermal alignment therefore determines a calculable late axion state rather than a homogeneous displacement alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04990 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Finite temperature phase exchange derived from Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Microscopic coefficients across the scalar wall. (a) The high susceptibility and Chern Simons damping vanish while the low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Full inertial memory and noise relation. (a) The propagated memory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Released state and late oscillator. (a) Abundance normalized isocurvature spectrum from the full field and velocity covariance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Sensitivity tests. (a) Finite memory stationary covariances as functions of the bath memory parameter. The dotted curve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Scale diagnostics. (a) The causal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Phys. Rept.643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870, 1 (2020), arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the 9 101 105 109 1013 1017 k[Mpc 1] 10 52 10 45 10 38 10 31 10 24 10 17 10 10 10 3 2 S (a) 2 Sa 2 S, inf 100 102 104 106 f[Hz] 10 26 10 24 10 22 10 20 10 18 10 16 h2 GW (b) h2 sw FIG. 6. Scale diagnostics. (a) The causal k3 spectrum and a scale invariant reference normalized to the Planck uncorrelated...

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  5. [5]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not-so-harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Kawasaki, F

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, Adiabatic sup- pression of the axion abundance and isocurvature due to cou- pling to hidden monopoles, JHEP01, 053, arXiv:1708.06047 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    R. T. Co, E. Gonzalez, and K. Harigaya, Axion misalignment driven to the bottom, JHEP05, 162, arXiv:1812.11186 [hep- ph]

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Papageorgiou, P

    A. Papageorgiou, P. Qu ´ ılez, and K. Schmitz, Axion dark matter from frictional misalignment, JHEP01, 169, arXiv:2206.01129 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    K. Choi, S. H. Im, H. J. Kim, and H. Seong, Axion dark mat- ter with thermal friction, JHEP02, 180, arXiv:2206.01462 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Zhang, Imperfect axion precludes the domain wall prob- lem, Phys

    Y. Zhang, Imperfect axion precludes the domain wall prob- lem, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 081003 (2024), arXiv:2305.15495 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Cao and D

    S. Cao and D. Boyanovsky, Brownian axionlike particles, Phys. Rev. D106, 123503 (2022), arXiv:2209.07658 [hep- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bouzoud, J

    K. Bouzoud, J. Ghiglieri, M. Laine, and G. S. S. Sakoda, Energy and momentum dependence of the soft-axion inter- action rate, JHEP05, 034, arXiv:2601.08221 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Guin and S

    S. Guin and S. Sharma, Revisiting the sphaleron and ax- ion production rates in QCD at high temperatures (2026), arXiv:2604.07256 [hep-lat]

    2026 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Gao, and Q

    Pirzada, Y. Gao, and Q. Yang, Parametric-resonance pro- duction of QCD axions, Phys. Lett. B879, 140680 (2026), arXiv:2602.06922 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Khan, Pirzada, and G

    I. Khan, Pirzada, and G. Mustafa, Post-inflationary quenched production of axion SU(2) dark matter (2026), arXiv:2604.07044 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Dvali, Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9505253 [hep-ph]

    G. Dvali, Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9505253 [hep-ph]

    1995 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Koutsangelas, Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale in the Kim–Shifman–Vainshtein–Zakharov and Dine–Fischler–Srednicki–Zhitnitsky models, Phys

    E. Koutsangelas, Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale in the Kim–Shifman–Vainshtein–Zakharov and Dine–Fischler–Srednicki–Zhitnitsky models, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095009 (2023), arXiv:2212.07822 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Di Luzio and P

    L. Di Luzio and P. Sørensen, Axion production via trapped misalignment from Peccei–Quinn symmetry breaking, JHEP 10, 239, arXiv:2408.04623 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Brandenberger, Noninflationary axion and ALP mis- alignment mechanism, Phys

    R. Brandenberger, Noninflationary axion and ALP mis- alignment mechanism, Phys. Rev. D112, 103523 (2025), arXiv:2507.00785 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Nakagawa, F

    S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi, M. Yamada, and W. Yin, Axion dark matter from first-order phase transition, and very high energy photons from GRB 221009A, Phys. Lett. B839, 137824 (2023), arXiv:2210.10022 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dvali, S

    G. Dvali, S. Fitz, and L. Komisel, Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale via confinement during inflation (2026), arXiv:2603.28620 [hep-ph]

    2026

  14. [22]

    J. E. Kim, Weak-interaction singlet and strong CP invari- ance, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 103 (1979)

    1979

  15. [23]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interac- tions?, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980)

    1980

  16. [24]

    Weinberg, Gauge and global symmetries at high temper- ature, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Gauge and global symmetries at high temper- ature, Phys. Rev. D9, 3357 (1974)

    1974

  17. [25]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi´ c, High temperature behavior of gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B89, 57 (1979)

    1979

  18. [26]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry behavior at finite tem- perature, Phys. Rev. D9, 3320 (1974)

    1974

  19. [27]

    S. R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 1. semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. D15, 2929 (1977), erratum: Phys. Rev. D 16, 1248 (1977)

    1977

  20. [28]

    Callan, Curtis G

    J. Callan, Curtis G. and S. R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 2. first quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D16, 1762 (1977)

    1977

  21. [29]

    A. D. Linde, Decay of the false vacuum at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B216, 421 (1983)

    1983

  22. [30]

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Damping mechanisms for coherent oscillations of axions, Phys. Rev. D32, 831 (1985)

    1985

  23. [31]

    M. S. Turner, Quantitative analysis of the thermal damping of coherent axion oscillations, Phys. Rev. D32, 843 (1985)

    1985

  24. [32]

    Banerjee, N

    A. Banerjee, N. H. Nguyen, and E. H. Tanin, Thermal damping of mass-modulating scalars, Phys. Rev. D114, 015032 (2026), arXiv:2512.05188 [hep-ph]

    2026

  25. [33]

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe, QCD and instantons at finite temperature, Rev. Mod. Phys.53, 43 (1981)

    1981

  26. [34]

    Di Vecchia and G

    P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Chiral dynamics in the largeNlimit, Nucl. Phys. B171, 253 (1980)

    1980

  27. [35]

    Leutwyler and A

    H. Leutwyler and A. Smilga, Spectrum of dirac operator and role of winding number in QCD, Phys. Rev. D46, 5607 (1992)

    1992

  28. [36]

    Pirzada, I. Khan, M. Khan, T. Li, and A. Muhammad, Non- minimal dilaton inflation from the effective gluodynamics (2026), arXiv:2603.00818 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Muhammad, T

    Pirzada, A. Muhammad, T. Li, I. Khan, and M. Khan, Dilaton-flattened axion inflation (2026), arXiv:2604.15194 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  30. [38]

    G. D. Moore and M. Tassler, The sphaleron rate in SU(N) gauge theory, JHEP02, 105, arXiv:1011.1167 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    D’Onofrio, K

    M. D’Onofrio, K. Rummukainen, and A. Tranberg, Sphaleron rate in the minimal standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 141602 (2014), arXiv:1404.3565 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    F. R. Klinkhamer and N. S. Manton, A saddle point solution in the weinberg–salam theory, Phys. Rev. D30, 2212 (1984)

    1984

  33. [41]

    P. B. Arnold and L. D. McLerran, Sphalerons, small fluctu- ations and baryon number violation in electroweak theory, Phys. Rev. D36, 581 (1987)

    1987

  34. [42]

    Miyamoto, H

    Y. Miyamoto, H. Motohashi, T. Suyama, and J. Yokoyama, Langevin description of gauged scalar fields in a thermal bath, Phys. Rev. D89, 085037 (2014), arXiv:1308.4794 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bartrum, A

    S. Bartrum, A. Berera, and J. G. Rosa, Fluctuation- 10 dissipation dynamics of cosmological scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D91, 083540 (2015), arXiv:1412.5489 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Ota, Fluctuation-dissipation relation in cosmic microwave background, JCAP05, 062, arXiv:2402.07623 [hep-th]

    A. Ota, Fluctuation-dissipation relation in cosmic microwave background, JCAP05, 062, arXiv:2402.07623 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Khan, Pirzada, G

    I. Khan, Pirzada, G. Mustafa, F. Atamurotov, and C. Yuan, Long inflation screens euclidean-wormhole initial states (2026), arXiv:2605.04166 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  38. [46]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  39. [47]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A9, 1387 (1976)

    1976

  40. [48]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature317, 505 (1985)

    1985

  41. [49]

    Chandran, A

    A. Chandran, A. Erez, S. S. Gubser, and S. L. Sondhi, The kibble-zurek problem: Universality and the scaling limit, Phys. Rev. B86, 064304 (2012), arXiv:1202.5277 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    2012 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ijaz, Pirzada, and M

    N. Ijaz, Pirzada, and M. U. Rehman, Shifted hybrid real- ization of non-minimal higgs inflation in light of ACT DR6 and Planck data (2026), arXiv:2607.04504 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Li, Controlled penumbral inflation from monodromic valleys (2026), arXiv:2605.10197 [hep-ph]

    Pirzada and T. Li, Controlled penumbral inflation from monodromic valleys (2026), arXiv:2605.10197 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. con- straints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro- ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Enander, A

    J. Enander, A. Pargner, and T. Schwetz, Axion miniclus- ter power spectrum and mass function, JCAP12, 038, arXiv:1708.04466 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    M. Feix, S. Hagstotz, A. Pargner, R. Reischke, B. M. Schae- fer, and T. Schwetz, Post-inflationary axion isocurvature perturbations facing CMB and large-scale structure, JCAP 11, 046, arXiv:2004.02926 [astro-ph.CO]

    2004 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Capriniet al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmo- logical phase transitions with LISA: An update, JCAP03, 024, arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]

    C. Capriniet al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmo- logical phase transitions with LISA: An update, JCAP03, 024, arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]. Appendix A: Power law release and dilation identity The power law limit isolates the local scaling structure near a smooth r...

    1910 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.