Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 29 references

CCAT: Characterization of the first science-grade MKID array for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The first science-grade MKID array for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module meets its design targets, showing that its two-octave frequency-tuning scheme decouples frequency placement from detector response.

desk verdict First science-grade 850 GHz MKID array shows promising yield and a plausible two-octave architecture, but the confirming claims outrun the data (four resonators, no error bars, model-referenced efficiency). read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05072 v1 pith:UXNDCU7C submitted 2026-08-05 astro-ph.IM physics.app-phphysics.ins-det

Anthony I. Huber , Jordan Wheeler , James Burgoyne , Scott Chapman , Jason Austermann , James Beall , Steve K. Choi , Doug Henke
show 10 more authors
Johannes Hubmayr Ben Keller Matthew Koc Jeff van Lanen Tilak Patel Adrian Sinclair Anna Vaskuri Eve M. Vavagiakis Michael Vissers Ruixuan (Matt) Xie
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMphysics.app-phphysics.ins-det
keywords microwavekineticinductancedetectorsMKIDarrayssubmillimeterastronomytwo-octavefrequencymultiplexingtitaniumnitridedetectorarraycharacterizationopticalefficiencyphoton-noise-limitedsensitivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first characterization of a science-grade detector array for the 850 GHz module of Prime-Cam, the highest-frequency camera module for a 6-meter submillimeter telescope at a 5,600-meter site. The array is built from dual-polarization titanium-nitride microwave kinetic inductance detectors (MKIDs), with more than 10,000 resonators on one wafer, and uses a two-octave frequency plan: coarse tuning by shorting inductor lines plus fine tuning with interdigital capacitors. The central claim is that this frequency-expanding architecture is decoupled from detector response, so shorted and non-shorted detectors show the same optical efficiency and photon-noise-limited sensitivity. If that holds, the planned 38,000-detector focal plane can be read out through practical RFSoC-based electronics, and the module remains on track for 2027 deployment.

What carries the argument

The device that carries the argument is the two-octave resonator frequency architecture, a scheme for spreading MKID resonance frequencies over a roughly two-octave band instead of a single narrow range. Coarse tuning is handled by shorting pairs of inductor lines, which lowers the inductance and moves the resonance into one of several bands while leaving the absorber geometry intact; fine tuning is handled by adjusting the interdigital capacitor. This lets each readout network hold more than 1,000 resonators without changing the optical design. The proof strategy is comparative: if the four variants formed by crossing two capacitor sizes with shorted and non-shorted inductors behave identically under loading, then frequency placement is not affecting detector physics.

What would settle it

Measure the same sampled detector regions under two or more well-separated blackbody temperatures and compute the optical efficiency from the change in loading without assuming the modelled passband; if the inferred efficiency disagrees with 75 percent by more than the model uncertainty, the optical-efficiency claim fails. Alternatively, a full-array scan in which shorted and non-shorted resonators separate in internal quality factor or noise under 70 pW loading would directly falsify the decoupling claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the first science-grade array works as designed. Sweeps of all 12 readout networks place more than 1,000 resonators per network across two octaves, with a fabrication yield above 90 percent despite a scratch on one network's feedline. Under optical loading stepped up to the expected 70 pW, the four detector variants—two capacitor sizes crossed with shorted and non-shorted inductors—shift in frequency together, retain comparable resonance depth and linewidth, and follow a single internal-quality-factor trend, which the authors take as confirmation that the inductor architecture is decoupled from the resonator response. The measured white noise equivalent power matches the modelled 75 percent optical efficiency of the test setup, and the low-frequency noise shows photon noise dominating two-level-system noise. The conclusion is that both the detectors and feedhorns perform as expected, clearing the way for the full module.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the array has the expected optical efficiency rests on matching the measured white noise to a modelled 75 percent efficiency for the test setup, so an inaccurate optical model, blackbody, or filter passband would leave the claim without independent support; the paper also assumes the few sampled regions represent all 12 networks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full Prime-Cam 850 GHz focal plane, with roughly 38,000 detectors across three arrays, can be read out with only 12 networks per array because each network holds more than 1,000 resonators.
  • The RFSoC readout chain, designed for the two-octave band, does not need detector-performance compromises to achieve its multiplexing factor.
  • The test-setup optical efficiency of 75 percent, together with the module's different filter passband, projects to greater than 90 percent efficiency at the deployment band.
  • All four detector architectures can be calibrated and operated with a single common readout and analysis treatment, since their response and noise are statistically indistinguishable.
  • If the array's performance is representative, the module is on schedule to begin observing in 2027.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the decoupling holds across the full wafer, the same coarse/fine tuning strategy could likely be pushed beyond two octaves, further cutting the number of cryogenic radio-frequency chains needed for even larger future arrays.
  • The observed coupling quality factor being 1.5 times higher than expected suggests that post-fabrication trimming, which the paper already plans, could restore loaded quality factors above the 15,000 target and bring shallow-resonator operation back into a comfortable readout regime.
  • A more direct test of the optical-efficiency claim than matching one modelled number would be measuring the NEP at two or more blackbody temperatures and deriving efficiency from the slope of loading versus response, removing reliance on a single passband model.
  • The paper's sampled regions cover only part of the 12 networks; extending the same LED mapping and optical tests to the full array would reveal whether the scratched feedline and any other wafer-level defects affect yield and uniformity estimates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first cryogenic characterization of a science-grade MKID array fabricated for the CCAT Prime-Cam 850 GHz module. The array uses a two-octave frequency plan in which coarse tuning is provided by selectively shorted inductor geometries and fine tuning by interdigitated capacitor variations, with the goal of multiplexing ~38,000 detectors across three arrays. The authors present S21 sweeps of all 12 networks, LED-based resonator mapping, optical loading curves, quality factor measurements, and NEP estimates from a few representative resonators. The main claims are: (i) a fabrication yield above 90% (the abstract states 99%); (ii) the shorted and non-shorted inductor architectures are decoupled from resonator performance; and (iii) the measured optical efficiency matches the modelled 75% value and the detectors are photon-noise limited. The paper explicitly labels these as preliminary results, and the conclusions state that future work will expand testing to larger regions.

Significance. If the claims hold, the two-octave coarse-short tuning strategy would be a significant enabling step for the 38,000-detector 850 GHz module, increasing multiplexing density without sacrificing detector sensitivity. The paper's strength is that it characterizes a fully fabricated science-grade array, not just test structures: the S21 survey of 12 networks, the LED mapping, and the controlled optical loading measurements are valuable direct data. However, the load-bearing confirmatory claims—decoupling of the inductor architecture, optical efficiency, and photon-noise-limited performance—rest on four representative resonators and on comparison to the authors' own modelled efficiency, with no reported uncertainties. As a milestone report the paper is useful, but as a confirmation of the architecture it currently under-delivers relative to its conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs. §4.1] The abstract states a "fabrication yield of 99%", while §4.1 explicitly says that after the loss of the ninth network due to a scratch on the feedline, "a greater than 90% fabrication yield was achieved". A 99% yield with one entirely nonfunctional network is internally inconsistent unless the definition of yield excludes whole networks. The yield claim is load-bearing for the fabrication-success narrative, so the definition and the exact number must be reconciled.
  2. [§4.2, Fig. 7 (right)] The optical-efficiency confirmation is not quantitatively supported. The right panel of Fig. 7 shows extracted white NEP values for four representative resonators with no error bars, no sample statistics, and no explicit comparison to the photon-noise limit (e.g., NEP_photon = sqrt(2 hν P) or an equivalent expression). The statement that the measured NEP "matches the expected modelled optical efficiency of the array of 75%" uses the authors' own model as the benchmark, so it is not an independent test of the optical design. A quantitative derivation of optical efficiency from NEP, with an uncertainty budget, is needed before the claim "This result confirms both the detectors and feedhorns work as expected" can be accepted.
  3. [§4.1, §4.2, §6] The central conclusions overstate the evidence. The claim that "the inductor architecture is decoupled from the response of the resonator" is supported by four representative resonators in Fig. 6 and Fig. 8, with no quantitative comparison of resonance depth, linewidth, Qi, or NEP distributions between shorted and non-shorted populations. Likewise, "this work confirms the expected optical efficiency and photon-noise limited performance of the array" is an extrapolation from four resonators to the entire array, even though the text acknowledges in §5 that "Future work will expand the testing across larger regions". At minimum, the sample size, the number of networks represented, and the scatter across those resonators must be reported and reflected in a more cautious conclusion.
  4. [§5, Fig. 8, Fig. 6] The performance limitations reported in §5 are in tension with the photon-noise-limited claim. The text states that Qi drops below the desired value of 15,000 even before reaching 70 pW of loading and that Qc is 1.5 times higher than expected; Fig. 6 shows that under loading the resonators become shallow, making the readout more susceptible to amplifier noise. If the resonators are not in the expected matched-coupling regime, the white NEP measured on four resonators may not be representative of the array's operating condition, and the photon-noise-limited assertion needs to account for the amplifier noise contribution under the achieved Qi and Qc values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2 heading] The heading "Two-Octave F requency Planning" contains an extra space in "F requency"; please correct the typo.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains an incomplete sentence: "The 850 GHz in a testing configuration with the blackbody and filters defines the incident power on a given sample region of the array." Please rephrase for clarity.
  3. [§4.2, Fig. 7] The left panel of Fig. 7 shows only two MKIDs, one shorted and one non-shorted, and the claim that TLS noise is subdominant is based on the visual separation between loaded and unloaded curves at low frequency. Please add a quantitative fit or bound for the TLS contribution, or state the statistical basis for this inference.
  4. [§3, §4.1] The text refers to "a small series of regions" sampled due to blackbody size limits, but it is not stated how many regions or how many networks are represented in Figs. 6–8. Please report the sampled region count and the network coverage explicitly.
  5. [§6] The statement that "more than 10,000 submillimeter MKIDs were successfully produced on a single silicon wafer, the most to date" lacks a supporting reference or quantitative comparison to earlier arrays. Please either provide a citation or soften the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims rest on direct measurements of a fabricated array against a stated design benchmark, not on fitted inputs or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—that the two-octave inductor architecture does not degrade resonator performance and that the measured NEP matches the expected optical efficiency—are supported by direct cryogenic measurements (S21, Qi under loading, loaded versus unloaded NEP) of the fabricated science-grade array. The 75% optical-efficiency value is presented as a design expectation or model prediction that the measurement is compared against, not as a parameter fitted to the same data, so the comparison is not a prediction forced by construction. The architecture motivations cite prior work by the same collaboration (Refs. 13, 14, 16), but those citations establish design provenance; the confirmatory evidence is the device response itself, and the paper does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or import any load-bearing result solely through self-citation. No equation or fitting step in the paper reduces a measured outcome to an input assumption. The acknowledged limitations—small sampled regions, preliminary status, and absence of a full uncertainty budget—are completeness and correctness concerns rather than evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims depend on assumptions that sampled detectors represent the array, that the blackbody loading reproduces the expected sky loading, and that the 75% modelled optical efficiency is an accurate benchmark. No new physical entities are introduced, and no numbers are fitted to data in the usual sense; the design targets, such as Qi = 15,000 and the expected Qc, are used as comparisons.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The sampled regions and representative resonators are representative of the full array.
    Section 3 and Section 4 state that a small series of regions were sampled and that four representative resonators are shown, but no random or statistically justified sampling is described.
  • domain assumption The blackbody and filter configuration reproduces the expected loading, including the 70 pW reference for best observing days.
    Section 4.2 states the loading was increased until reaching the expected level of 70 pW, citing Ref. 8 for the atmospheric model rather than an independent in-situ calibration.
  • domain assumption The modelled optical efficiency of 75% for the test setup is an accurate benchmark.
    Fig. 7 compares measured white NEP to the modelled optical efficiency and interprets the match as confirmation of detector and feedhorn performance; the accuracy of the model is not independently established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CCAT: Characterization of the first science-grade MKID array for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UXNDCU7C

@misc{pith2026260805072,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CCAT: Characterization of the first science-grade MKID array for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UXNDCU7C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05072}
}
read the original abstract

The Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope (FYST) is a 6-meter crossed-Dragone telescope developed by the CCAT collaboration. Sited at 5600 m on Cerro Chajnantor in the Atacama Plateau of Chile, FYST aims to provide superior atmospheric transmission and a wide field of view for submillimeter observations. Prime-Cam is a first-generation instrument for FYST designed to house up to seven separate instrument modules. Among these, the 850 GHz module represents the highest-frequency band and is optimized for ultra-sensitive broadband polarimetry and imaging. This module is designed to deploy ~38,000 polarization-sensitive lumped-element titanium-nitride (TiN) microwave kinetic inductance detectors (MKIDs) across three arrays. Thus the 850 GHz module will have the most submillimeter MKIDs in a single instrument module to date. These detectors have adopted a novel two-octave design to maximize the multiplexing achieved using a RFSoC readout system. We review the design parameters and fabrication process for the first 850 GHz science-grade array. The preliminary measurements of the array show a fabrication yield of 99%, highlighting the successful application of the design and fabrication process. We further present the cryogenic characterization of the first full MKID array developed for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module. Multiple tests were performed on the devices including resonator frequency mapping, quality factor measurements, optical load sweeps and noise performance. From these measurements, we discuss the measured optical efficiency, sensitivity, and uniformity across the array and the expected on-sky performance of the module. The 850 GHz module will be deployed for observing in 2027.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05072 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: The Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope (FYST), a 6-meter crossed-Dragone telescope designed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rendering of a single 850 GHz pixel consisting of two orthogonal lumped-element kinetic inductance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The first science-grade detector array for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module. The array was fabricated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental setup of the blackbody (top) relative to the test array (bottom). Due to size constraints, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: First results depicting the S21 measurements of all 12 networks on the test-array. The gap was inten￾tionally included to create greater separation between the non-shorted (left) and shorted (right) architectures. Inspection of the ninth network found a small scratch a…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Resonator response to increasing optical loading. Each panel depicts the response for representative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: measured NEP values for shorted (top) and non-shorted (bottom) MKIDs. Right: Extracted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Internal quality factor for four representative MKIDs under increasing optical loading. Fits show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Review: far-infrared instrumentation and technological development for the next decade,

    Farrah, D. et al., “Review: far-infrared instrumentation and technological development for the next decade,” Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems5(2), 1 – 34 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    ESA Space Science Programme, Cosmic Vision 2015-2025, for astrophysics,

    Turon, C., “ESA Space Science Programme, Cosmic Vision 2015-2025, for astrophysics,”Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union2(14), 530–531 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Enduring Quests-Daring Visions (NASA Astrophysics in the Next Three Decades),

    Kouveliotou, C. et al., “Enduring Quests-Daring Visions (NASA Astrophysics in the Next Three Decades),” (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Far-infrared surveys of galaxy evolution,

    Lutz, D., “Far-infrared surveys of galaxy evolution,”Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics52(1), 373 – 414 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    CCAT-prime: a novel telescope for sub-millimeter astronomy,

    Parshley, S. et al., “CCAT-prime: a novel telescope for sub-millimeter astronomy,” inGround-based and Airborne Telescopes VII, H. K. Marshall and J. Spyromilio, Eds.,10700, 1744 – 1758, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    The optical design of the six-meter CCAT-prime and Simons Observatory telescopes,

    Parshley, S. et al., “The optical design of the six-meter CCAT-prime and Simons Observatory telescopes,” inGround-based and Airborne Telescopes VII, H. K. Marshall and J. Spyromilio, Eds.,10700, 1292 – 1304, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Designs for a large-aperture telescope to map the cmb 10x faster,

    Niemack, M., “Designs for a large-aperture telescope to map the cmb 10x faster,”Appl. Opt.55, 1688 – 1696 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    CCAT-prime Collaboration: Science Goals and Forecasts with Prime-Cam on the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope,

    CCAT-Prime Collaboration, “CCAT-prime Collaboration: Science Goals and Forecasts with Prime-Cam on the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope,”The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series264, 7 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Prime-Cam: a first-light instrument for the CCAT-prime telescope,

    Vavagiakis, E.M. et al., “Prime-Cam: a first-light instrument for the CCAT-prime telescope,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IX, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, Eds.,10708, 187 – 202, International Society for Optics and P...

    2018

  2. [10]

    CCAT-prime: optical and cryogenic design of the 850 GHz module for Prime-Cam,

    Huber, A.I. et al., “CCAT-prime: optical and cryogenic design of the 850 GHz module for Prime-Cam,” in Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, J. Zmuidzi- nas and J.-R. Gao, Eds.,12190, 121901D, International Society for Opti...

    2022

  3. [11]

    CCAT-prime: the 850 GHz camera for prime-cam on FYST,

    Chapman, S.C. et al., “CCAT-prime: the 850 GHz camera for prime-cam on FYST,” (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Lumped element kinetic inductance detectors,

    Doyle, S. et al., “Lumped element kinetic inductance detectors,”Journal of Low Temperature Physics151, 530–536 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    CCAT: design and performance of densely packed, high-frequency, dual-polarization kinetic inductance detectors for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module,

    Huber, A.I. et al., “CCAT: design and performance of densely packed, high-frequency, dual-polarization kinetic inductance detectors for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far- Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XII, J. Zmuidzinas ...

    2024

  6. [14]

    Phd thesis, University of Victoria (2024)

    Huber, A.I.,Optical, mechanical, and detector developments for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module. Phd thesis, University of Victoria (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    CCAT: a two-octave 1.024-GHz-KID readout featuring an overlap-channel polyphase syn- thesis filter bank on RFSoC

    Xie, M. et al., “CCAT: a two-octave 1.024-GHz-KID readout featuring an overlap-channel polyphase syn- thesis filter bank on RFSoC.” SPIE 2026, Paper 14156-101

    2026

  8. [16]

    High-density photon-noise-limited multi-octave submillimeter kinetic inductance de- tectors for the prime-cam 850 ghz module,

    Huber, A.I. et al., “High-density photon-noise-limited multi-octave submillimeter kinetic inductance de- tectors for the prime-cam 850 ghz module,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity35(5), 1–7 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    CCAT-Prime: Characterization of the First 280 GHz MKID Array for Prime-Cam,

    Choi, S.K. et al., “CCAT-Prime: Characterization of the First 280 GHz MKID Array for Prime-Cam,” Journal of Low Temperature Physics209, 849 – 856 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    CCAT: Design and Characterization of the 350 GHz Instrument Module

    Keller, B. et al., “CCAT: Design and Characterization of the 350 GHz Instrument Module.” SPIE 2026, Paper 14156-99

    2026

  11. [19]

    CCAT: a status update on the EoR-Spec instrument module for Prime-Cam,

    Freundt, R. et al., “CCAT: a status update on the EoR-Spec instrument module for Prime-Cam,” inMil- limeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XII, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, Eds.,13102, 131020U, International Society for Optics and ...

    2024

  12. [20]

    CCAT: optical design of the 410GHz prime-cam module

    Patel, T. et al., “CCAT: optical design of the 410GHz prime-cam module.” SPIE 2026, Paper 14156-99

    2026

  13. [21]

    CCAT-prime: RFSoC based readout for frequency multiplexed kinetic inductance detectors,

    Sinclair, A.K. et al., “CCAT-prime: RFSoC based readout for frequency multiplexed kinetic inductance detectors,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, Eds.,12190, 121900W, International Societ...

    2022

  14. [22]

    CCAT: detector noise limited performance of the RFSoC-based readout electronics for mm/sub-mm/far-IR KIDs

    Sinclair, A.K. et al., “CCAT: detector noise limited performance of the RFSoC-based readout electronics for mm/sub-mm/far-IR KIDs.” SPIE 2024, Paper 13102-152

    2024

  15. [23]

    CCAT: Multi-rate DSP for sub-mm astronomy: polyphase synthesis filter bank on FPGA for enhanced MKID readout

    Xie, M. et al., “CCAT: Multi-rate DSP for sub-mm astronomy: polyphase synthesis filter bank on FPGA for enhanced MKID readout.” SPIE 2024, Paper 13102-80

    2024

  16. [24]

    Proximity-coupled ti/tin multilayers for use in kinetic inductance detectors,

    Vissers, M.R. et al., “Proximity-coupled ti/tin multilayers for use in kinetic inductance detectors,”Applied Physics Letters102, 232603 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Ccat: Led mapping and characterization of the 280 ghz tin kid array,

    Middleton, A. et al., “Ccat: Led mapping and characterization of the 280 ghz tin kid array,”IEEE Trans- actions on Applied Superconductivity35(5), 1–4 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    CCAT: LED mapping of the 850GHz instrument module for Prime-Cam on FYST

    Burgoyne, J.R. et al., “CCAT: LED mapping of the 850GHz instrument module for Prime-Cam on FYST.” SPIE 2026, Paper 14156-99

    2026

  19. [27]

    Two-level system noise reduction for Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors,

    Noroozian, O. et al., “Two-level system noise reduction for Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors,”AIP Conference Proceedings1185, 148–151 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    PhD thesis, California Institute of Tech- nology (2008)

    Gao, J.,The Physics of Superconducting Microwave Resonators. PhD thesis, California Institute of Tech- nology (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Transition edge sensors and kinetic inductance detectors in astronomical instruments,

    P. Mauskopf, “Transition edge sensors and kinetic inductance detectors in astronomical instruments,”Pub- lications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific130, 082001 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.