Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 59 references

German parties shifted towards intuition-based rhetoric after the far right's parliamentary breakthrough

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that German elite rhetoric moved toward intuition-based language after the AfD's 2017 entry, most sharply in the chamber.

desk verdict Real descriptive pattern, overstated headline: the 2017 chamber-wide shift is not separated from the AfD's mechanical entry, but the data work and disclosures deserve serious referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05075 v1 pith:B64Y6BDV submitted 2026-08-05 cs.CL

Peer Saleth , Segun T. Aroyehun , Fabio Carrella , Christoph M. Abels , Stephan Lewandowsky , David Garcia This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords evidenceminusintuitionepistemicorientationfar-rightcontagionGermanBundestagpoliticalrhetoricdistributeddictionaryrepresentationTwitterelitediscoursestructuralbreakpoints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that, between 2015 and 2025, the rhetorical style of German political elites moved away from evidence-based argument and toward intuition-based language, and that the sharpest single shift in parliamentary speech coincided with the entry of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017. The authors trace this movement in two complementary arenas: 4.5 million tweets from over 2,000 German politicians and 59,170 plenary speeches in the Bundestag. If the result holds, the long-run decline of evidence-based political discourse previously documented in the United States is also present in a multiparty European democracy, and far-right visibility tracks not just what parties talk about but how they commit to truth. The paper is explicit that these are co-movements, not proof of causation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument is the Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) score: a text's averaged word embedding is compared by cosine similarity to averaged embeddings of a validated German evidence dictionary and a validated German intuition dictionary; the two similarities are z-scored across the corpus, and EMI is their difference. Platform-specific word2vec embeddings are trained on a historical parliamentary corpus and fine-tuned separately on tweets and contemporary speeches. Structural-break linear mixed-effects models with breakpoints at the 2017, 2021, and 2025 federal elections, plus a neural topic model used to add topic fixed effects, carry the temporal and party-level inferences.

What would settle it

Fix topic, sentiment, and platform composition so that the 2017 breakpoint is the only thing varying, and re-estimate the EMI regressions on sentiment- and topic-matched speech segments, or replace the evidence and intuition dictionaries with matched neutral control dictionaries. If the chamber-wide 2017 drop persists with control dictionaries, EMI is measuring something other than epistemic orientation specifically; if it disappears once sentiment and topic are matched, the claimed rhetorical shift is an artifact of textual composition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that an Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) score declines in both arenas over the decade: mean EMI on Twitter falls from 0.027 to -0.035, and in the Bundestag from 0.205 to -0.147. Right-leaning actors, above all the AfD, hold the lowest EMI scores throughout. In the chamber, a breakpoint regression shows a significant downward level shift at the 2017 election that is uniform across ideological camps, with further shifts at the 2021 and 2025 elections; on Twitter the decline is gradual and approximately linear. The estimates survive controls for document-level topic fixed effects, which the authors read as evidence that the shift is stylistic rather than a change in the topics under debate.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on treating the EMI score, a difference of z-scored cosine similarities to evidence and intuition word lists, as a valid measure of a speaker's epistemic approach to truth, including in short tweets, rather than as a proxy for topic, sentiment, or platform style.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, the US-style decline in evidence-based congressional language has a multiparty European analogue within a single decade.
  • Far-right 'contagion' would extend beyond policy positions and issue salience to a third dimension: the epistemic style of how truth claims are made.
  • Mainstream and left parties converged downward toward the right's intuition-heavy baseline without the ordering of camps ever inverting.
  • Because the shift survives topic fixed effects, responses to far-right entry that target individual false claims may miss the level at which discourse is changing.
  • The contrast between discrete parliamentary shifts and gradual Twitter decline suggests different mechanisms: compositional adaptation in the chamber and continuous diffusion online.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension implied by the paper's diffusion story: politicians' measurable network exposure to AfD content should predict within-actor EMI decline, not just aggregate co-movement.
  • Applying the same measurement to other countries with differently timed far-right entries would quasi-experimentally separate the 2017 event from concurrent shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine.
  • If EMI partly tracks emotional intensity or contested topics rather than epistemic posture, then fact-checking and platform moderation aimed at individual claims may address the symptom rather than the rhetorical drift; this could be tested by re-validating EMI on sentiment-matched texts.
  • The same dictionaries could be extended to mass-media or citizen discourse, a step the paper notes is outside its elite-only scope but that would show whether the shift begins with elites or with the public.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 4.5 million tweets and 59,170 Bundestag speeches from 2015–2025 to ask whether German political elites' rhetoric shifted from evidence- toward intuition-based language after the far-right AfD entered parliament in 2017. Using a distributed dictionary representation (DDR), the authors compute an Evidence-Minus-Intuition (EMI) score for each text and estimate mixed-effects models with election-year breakpoints. They report: (i) a consistent decline in EMI over time on both Twitter and in parliament, (ii) a persistent left-to-right ordering with the AfD lowest, and (iii) a sharp chamber-wide downward level shift in parliamentary EMI at the 2017 election breakpoint, together with a more gradual decline on Twitter. The manuscript interprets these patterns as an association between far-right parliamentary entry and a changing approach to truth in elite discourse, while noting that causal attribution is not possible.

Significance. If the measurement assumptions hold, this is a valuable cross-arena, multiparty extension of prior work on evidence-versus-intuition rhetoric in U.S. congressional speeches. The study leverages a large, heterogeneous corpus, two arenas with opposite failure modes, an EU DSA Article 40 data access, preregistered human validation, bootstrap stability checks, and topic-fixed-effect robustness analyses. The finding that parliamentary EMI declined most sharply at the exact moment of AfD's entry is a striking descriptive result that could motivate further causal designs. However, the paper's central claim—that 'German parties shifted'—is stronger than what the current identification supports, and the reported cross-embedding validation contains a numerical inconsistency. These issues are fixable but currently limit the strength of the conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, Table A8, Eq. 3] The 2017 chamber-wide shift is not identified as a party-level shift among established parties. Because the AfD has no pre-2017 Bundestag speeches, the AfD main effect and the post-2017 indicator are collinear, which is why Table A8 reports no 'level elec2017 right' interaction. The constrained breakpoint level_elec2017 = -0.427 therefore mixes the mechanical entry of roughly 6,700 AfD speeches with mean EMI -0.473 (Table A5) with any genuine within-speaker or within-party change. The paper itself acknowledges this by describing the Bundestag shifts as aligning 'with changes in the composition of the Bundestag' (§2.3) and listing 'compositional adaptation' as a mechanism (Discussion). Given this, the abstract's and title's claim that 'German parties shifted' is an overreach. An analysis excluding AfD speeches or restricted to MPs observed on both sides of 2017 is required before the claim can be made.
  2. [§2.2 and §4.5 vs. Supplementary Note 2.1] The main text and Methods state that fastText-based EMI scores correlate with the primary gensim-based scores at r = 0.93 (95% CI [0.91, 0.94]), but Supplementary Note 2.1 reports document-level correlations of 0.80 for parliamentary speeches and 0.65 for Twitter. This discrepancy is load-bearing because the r = 0.93 statistic is used to argue that results are not specific to the fine-tuned embedding model. If the Twitter correlation is in fact 0.65, the robustness claim is substantially weakened for the arena where the paper makes its main temporal comparisons. The authors must reconcile these numbers and report the correlation separately for each corpus.
  3. [§4.5, Supplementary Notes 2.2 and 2.12] The validity of EMI as a measure of epistemic orientation is moderate and deserves a stronger discriminant-validity check. The reported AUC of 0.72 for EMI is acceptable, but the single-rater ICCs (0.14–0.16) are low, and the mean cosine similarity between the evidence and intuition dictionary embeddings is 0.44 on Twitter, indicating substantial semantic overlap between the two poles of the difference score. Although the paper honestly reports these numbers, the interpretation of EMI as a stable epistemic-style signal would be strengthened by a placebo test using matched random word lists or by demonstrating that the 2017 shift and party ordering are not reproduced when EMI is computed from sentiment-matched or frequency-matched control dictionaries.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.3 vs. Supplementary Note 2.11] The demographic description of the keyword-validation sample is inconsistent: the main text reports '35 male, 12 female' participants, while Supplementary Figure 25 and the accompanying text report '35 women and 12 non-binary/diverse'. The authors should correct this discrepancy.
  2. [Discussion, §3] The sentence 'we find a chamber-wide and largely party uniformly shift in 2017 shwon by the finding that both mainstream left and mainstream right shift positions once a radical right party enters parliament' is ungrammatical and contains a typo ('shwon'); it should be rewritten for clarity.
  3. [Figures 2 and 3, Methods Eq. 2] The figures mark the 2017 election breakpoint at 1 July 2017, and the text says breakpoints were set 'approximately one month before the election date.' The federal election took place on 24 September 2017, so 1 July is more than one month earlier. Please clarify how the breakpoint date was chosen.
  4. [Table A8] The absence of a right-camp interaction for the 2017 breakpoint should be explained in a table note (e.g., collinearity due to no pre-2017 AfD speeches) so that readers do not interpret it as a null finding.
  5. [General] Several figure captions and some text passages contain garbled character sequences (e.g., repeated '/uni000000...' fragments in the captions of Figures 1–4 and A1–A2). These rendering artifacts must be cleaned before submission.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the 'chamber-wide, no-camp-differences' 2017 breakpoint is partly imposed by model specification, while the core EMI measurement and temporal trends are not forced.

  1. self definitional [Results §2.3 (Equation 3, Table A8); Discussion]
    "The 2017 election is associated with a significant downward level shift (β=−0.427, P<0.001, 95% CI [−0.485,−0.369]) without a significant slope change (P=0.780); the camp-specific deviations are not significant. ... The 2017 shift was chamber-wide, with no significant differences between ideological camps."

    The AfD has no pre-2017 Bundestag speeches, so in Equation 3 the right-leaning main effect and the post-2017 indicator are collinear. Table A8 contains no 'level elec2017 right' or 'slope elec2017 right' interaction, only the left interactions. The right camp's 2017 level deviation is therefore fixed at zero by the model, making the 'no significant differences between ideological camps' conclusion true for the right by construction rather than by estimation. The uniform 'chamber-wide' shift is thus partly an input assumption, not an output. The rolling-window analysis and the centre/left estimates provide independent support for a partial shift, so the circularity is limited to the uniformity claim.

full rationale

The paper's core empirical content is not circular: the Twitter decline, the parliamentary early-versus-late EMI change, and the party ordering are computed directly from text and no parameter was fitted to reproduce the AfD's 2017 entry. The EMI measure is inherited from the authors' own prior work (refs 25 and 21), but the German dictionary validation, the fastText correlation (r=0.93), and the human-rating AUC of 0.72 supply external anchors, so this is framework continuity rather than a forced derivation. The one genuine circular element is the 2017 'chamber-wide, no-camp-differences' claim: for the right camp the model cannot estimate a 2017 interaction, and the uniform level shift is imposed by specification, then reported as an empirical finding. Because the centre/left step-downs and the Twitter trend remain independent evidence, the central claim does not fully reduce to its inputs, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is observational. The main burden sits in the measurement instrument: validated word lists and embedding similarities define the outcome, and the z-score normalization makes EMI relative within each corpus. These choices are disclosed and partially validated against human ratings, but they are not external benchmarks independent of the authors' EMI framework.

free parameters (4)
  • German evidence and intuition dictionary word lists = 86 validated keywords (48 evidence, 38 intuition)
    Chosen and filtered by a 47-participant rating survey; they define the EMI construct and therefore shape every document score, though they were not fitted to the temporal outcome.
  • Word embedding hyperparameters = word2vec: 10 epochs, window 10, 100 dimensions; fastText baseline: 300 dimensions
    Embedding choices affect all cosine similarities; the reported fastText comparison is inconsistent between the main text and supplementary material.
  • Within-corpus z-score normalization = mean 0, standard deviation 1 per corpus
    Applied separately to Twitter and Bundestag corpora, so EMI is a relative score within each arena and early versus late differences are relative to the whole-period distribution.
  • Breakpoint placement for elections = one month before 2017, 2021 and 2025 federal elections
    Chosen by hand; the estimated level shifts depend on this timing, although the election dates themselves are not fitted.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Cosine similarity between averaged word embeddings approximates the rhetorical style of a text.
    Central to the DDR pipeline; it is validated only indirectly through human ratings with moderate agreement.
  • domain assumption The translated German dictionaries operationalize evidence-based and intuition-based approaches to truth.
    Depends on the same group's English EMI framework and a 47-person validation; some intuition items such as 'Fake News' and 'Propaganda' may tie the measure to culture-war topics.
  • domain assumption Within-corpus z-scoring leaves temporal EMI trends interpretable as changes in relative rhetorical style.
    Because scores are standardized over the whole 2015 to 2025 corpus, the early versus late mean difference is relative to the corpus average, not an absolute drop in evidence language.
  • domain assumption Party labels from CHES and the GESIS handle list correctly assign actors to left, centre and right camps.
    All party-level comparisons rely on this assignment; BSW is placed in the left camp and AfD in the right.
  • standard math The mixed-effects specification with random intercepts and a one-quarter lagged EMI term adequately handles actor heterogeneity and autocorrelation.
    Model diagnostics are reported as satisfactory, but the lagged term may absorb part of the temporal signal it is meant to explain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of German parties shifted towards intuition-based rhetoric after the far right's parliamentary breakthrough." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B64Y6BDV

@misc{pith2026260805075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: German parties shifted towards intuition-based rhetoric after the far right's parliamentary breakthrough},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B64Y6BDV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05075}
}
read the original abstract

The spread of misinformation is widely perceived as a threat to democratic deliberation, yet how political elites' rhetorical commitments to truth shift alongside the rise of populist actors remains poorly understood. Analysing 4.5 million tweets and 59,170 parliamentary speeches by German political elites between 2015 and 2025, we measure evidence-based and intuition-based rhetoric using a validated distributed dictionary representation. Across both arenas, intuition-based language has become more prominent, and right-leaning actors consistently exhibit the lowest Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) scores. The parliamentary entry of the extreme-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017 coincides with sharp downward shifts in EMI across the broader chamber, while a more gradual decline is observed on Twitter. These findings document an association between far-right visibility and a changing approach to truth in elite discourse in a multiparty European democracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05075 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Speeches Descriptives 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Party Distribution Parliament Speeches 2014 to 2022 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Descriptives Tweets 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (27 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Party Distribution Twitter 2 Evidence Minus Intuition Scores For ensuring robust findings, we validate the Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) score through multiple approaches. What follows is an explanation and short interpretation of all validation steps (see the meth￾od…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model Correlation 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Truth Histograms 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Text-length correlation 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Text -length Correlationmatrix 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Word Similarity Distributions 2.5 EMI Components The EMI score is a difference measure, so a decline can in principle arise from falling evidence-based language, rising intuition-based language, or both. To disentangle these components, Figures 12 and 13 display the q…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Component-level rhetorical styles in tweets by political leaning, 2015–2025. A, Quarterly averages of the Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) score, B, intuition-based language similarity, and C, evidence-based language similarity, with parties grouped by ideological leani…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Component-level rhetorical styles in parliamentary speeches by political leaning, 2015–2025. A, Quarterly averages of the Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) score, B, intuition-based language similarity, and C evidence-based language similarity, with parties grouped by id…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Scatter Twitter Corpus 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Scatter Parliament Corpus 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_15.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Word mover graphs 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Clipping Correlation 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Boxplots Parliament Corpus 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Boxplots Twitter Corpus 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Intuition and Evidence Timeline with Bootstrapped CIs Twitter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Intuition and Evidence Timeline with Bootstrapped CIs Parliament Speeches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Evidence, Intuition, and EMI in Historical Speeches Averaged by Legislative Period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Demographics of the 47 German-speaking annotators recruited via Prolific. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Distributions of Evidenz (orange) and Intuition (blue) representativeness ratings for German keywords beginning with letters A–L (N = 47 annotators, five-point Likert scale). Each panel shows one keyword; boxes indicate the interquartile range, horizontal lines the me…
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Distributions of Evidenz (orange) and Intuition (blue) representativeness ratings for German keywords beginning with letters M–Z (N = 47 annotators, five-point Likert scale). Each panel shows one keyword; boxes indicate the interquartile range, horizontal lines the me…
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Distribution of Annotations Participants rated statements on two dimensions: evidence and intuition using a 5-point Likert scale from -2 to 2. Each statement was independently rated in two separate columns: one for evidence and one for intuition. To facilitate classif…
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Participant Demographics 38 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Survey Correlation To validate the EMI scores against human annotations, we computed a survey-based equivalent of EMI (survey_emi) using the participants’ Likert-scale ratings. The average rating across all annotators was computed for both dimensions as evidence_surve…
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: Evidence, Intuition ROC 40 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_31.png]
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: EMI ROC 41 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_32.png]
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: Diagnostic plots for the Twitter linear mixed-effects model. (a) Distribution of standardised residuals, approximately symmetric and centred around zero, indicating no systematic prediction bias. (b) Residuals versus fitted values; the absence of a pronounced non-line…
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: Diagnostic plots for the Bundestag breakpoint mixed-effects model. (a) Distribu￾tion of standardised residuals, approximately symmetric and centred around zero. (b) Residuals versus fitted values; no pronounced non-linear pattern, with clustering reflecting the actor-…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abrami, M

    G. Abrami, M. Bagci, and A. Mehler, `` German Parliamentary Corpus (GerParCor) Reloaded ,'' in Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), N. Calzolari, M.-Y. Kan, V. Hoste, A. Lenci, S. Sakti, and N. Xue, Eds. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Torino, Italy: ELRA and ...

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    o gerl, S. Heine, and K. Sch \

    F. Richter, P. Koch, O. Franke, J. Kraus, F. Kuruc, A. Thiem, J. H \"o gerl, S. Heine, and K. Sch \"o ps, `` Open Discourse: Plenarprotokolle des Deutschen Bundestages seit 1949 ,'' Harvard Dataverse, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://opendiscourse.de/

    work page 1949

  3. [3]

    S. T. Aroyehun, A. Simchon, F. Carrella, J. Lasser, S. Lewandowsky, and D. Garcia, `` Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition ,'' Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1122--1133, 4 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02136-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02136-2 2025

  4. [4]

    Lasser, S

    J. Lasser, S. T. Aroyehun, F. Carrella, A. Simchon, D. Garcia, and S. Lewandowsky, `` From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by US politicians ,'' Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 2140--2151, 12 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01691-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01691-w 2023

  5. [5]

    Lasser, S

    J. Lasser, S. T. Aroyehun, A. Simchon, F. Carrella, D. Garcia, and S. Lewandowsky, `` Social media sharing of low-quality news sources by political elites ,'' PNAS Nexus, vol. 1, no. 4, p. pgac186, 9 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac186

    work page doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac186 2022

  6. [7]

    title Freedom in the world 2020: A leaderless struggle for democracy

    author Freedom House . title Freedom in the world 2020: A leaderless struggle for democracy . type Tech. Rep. , institution Freedom House , address Washington, DC ( year 2020 )

    work page 2020

  7. [8]

    & author Slipowitz, A

    author Repucci, S. & author Slipowitz, A. title Democracy under siege . type Tech. Rep. , institution Freedom House , address Washington, DC ( year 2021 )

    work page 2021

  8. [9]

    author Lazer, D. M. J. et al. title The science of fake news . journal Science volume 359 , pages 1094--1096 ( year 2018 )

    work page 2018

Show all 59 references
  1. [10]

    author Van Bavel, J. J. et al. title Political Psychology in the Digital (mis)Information age: A Model of News Belief and Sharing . journal Social Issues and Policy Review volume 15 , pages 84--113 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  2. [11]

    , author Brady, W

    author Simchon, A. , author Brady, W. J. & author Van Bavel, J. J. title Troll and divide: the language of online polarization . journal PNAS Nexus volume 1 , pages pgac019 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  3. [12]

    author McCright , A. M. & author Dunlap, R. E. title Combatting misinformation requires recognizing its types and the factors that facilitate its spread and resonance. journal Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition volume 6 , pages 389--396 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  4. [13]

    , author de Figueiredo, A

    author Loomba, S. , author de Figueiredo, A. , author Piatek, S. J. , author de Graaf, K. & author Larson, H. J. title Measuring the impact of COVID -19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA . journal Nature Human Behaviour volume 5 , pages 337--348 ( ...

    2021

  5. [14]

    , author Leiserowitz, A

    author van der Linden, S. , author Leiserowitz, A. , author Rosenthal, S. & author Maibach, E. title Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change . journal Global Challenges volume 1 , pages 1600008 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  6. [15]

    author Ribeiro, M. H. , author Calais, P. H. , author Almeida, V. A. F. & author Meira, W. title ``everything I disagree with is \# FakeNews '': Correlating political polarization and spread of misinformation ( year 2017 ). ://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05924

    2017 arXiv

  7. [16]

    author Jones-Jang, S. M. , author Kim, D. H. & author Kenski, K. title Perceptions of mis- or disinformation exposure predict political cynicism: Evidence from a two-wave survey during the 2018 US midterm elections . journal New Media & Society volume 23 , pages 3105--3125 ( y...

    2018

  8. [17]

    , author Fraccaroli, N

    author Cantarella, M. , author Fraccaroli, N. & author Volpe, R. title Does fake news affect voting behaviour? journal Research Policy volume 52 , pages 104628 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  9. [18]

    & author Schwarz, C

    author Müller, K. & author Schwarz, C. title Fanning the flames of hate: Social media and hate crime . journal Journal of the European Economic Association volume 19 , pages 2131--2167 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  10. [19]

    , author Oswald, L

    author Lorenz-Spreen, P. , author Oswald, L. , author Lewandowsky, S. & author Hertwig, R. title A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy . journal Nature Human Behaviour volume 7 , pages 74--101 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  11. [20]

    , author Garcia, D

    author Lewandowsky, S. , author Garcia, D. , author Simchon, A. & author Carrella, F. title When liars are considered honest . journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences volume 28 , pages 383--385 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  12. [21]

    , author Cohen, T

    author Cooper, B. , author Cohen, T. R. , author Huppert, E. , author Levine, E. E. & author Fleeson, W. title Honest behavior: Truth-Seeking, Belief-Speaking, and fostering understanding of the truth in others . journal Academy of Management Annals volume 17 , pages 655--683 ...

    2023

  13. [22]

    author Lasser, J. et al. title From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by US politicians . journal Nature Human Behaviour volume 7 , pages 2140--2151 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  14. [23]

    author Lasser, J. et al. title Social media sharing of low-quality news sources by political elites . journal PNAS Nexus volume 1 , pages pgac186 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  15. [24]

    author Carrella, F. et al. title Different honesty conceptions align across US politicians' tweets and public replies . journal Nature Communications volume 16 , pages 1409 ( year 2025 )

    2025

  16. [25]

    author Garrett, R. K. & author Weeks, B. E. title Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation . journal PLoS ONE volume 12 , pages e0184733 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  17. [26]

    title in Willful construction of ignorance: A tale of two ontologies (eds editor Hertwig, R

    author Lewandowsky, S. title in Willful construction of ignorance: A tale of two ontologies (eds editor Hertwig, R. & editor Engel, C. ) booktitle Deliberate Ignorance: Choosing Not to Know , Vol. volume 29 of series Str \"u ngmann Forum Reports pages 101--118 ( publisher MIT ...

    2021

  18. [27]

    , author Lewandowsky, S

    author Aroyehun, S. , author Lewandowsky, S. & author Garcia, D. title Epistemic orientation in parliamentary discourse is associated with deliberative democracy ( year 2026 ). ://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19699

    2026 arXiv

  19. [28]

    title Alfred rosenberg: The N azi W eltanschauung as modern gnosis

    author Varshizky, A. title Alfred rosenberg: The N azi W eltanschauung as modern gnosis . journal Politics, Religion & Ideology volume 13 , pages 311--331 ( year 2012 )

    2012

  20. [29]

    title The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin ( publisher University of Missouri Press , year 1989 )

    author Voegelin, E. title The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin ( publisher University of Missouri Press , year 1989 )

    1989

  21. [30]

    post-truth

    author Lewandowsky, S. , author Ecker, U. K. H. & author Cook, J. title Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. journal Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition volume 6 , pages 353--369 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  22. [31]

    author Aroyehun, S. T. et al. title Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition . journal Nature Human Behaviour volume 9 , pages 1122--1133 ( year 2025 )

    2025

  23. [32]

    title Contagious parties: Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties' immigration stances in contemporary W estern E urope

    author van Spanje, J. title Contagious parties: Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties' immigration stances in contemporary W estern E urope . journal Party Politics volume 16 , pages 563--586 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  24. [33]

    & author Krause, W

    author Abou-Chadi, T. & author Krause, W. title The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties' policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach . journal British Journal of Political Science volume 50 , pages 829--847 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  25. [34]

    author Meguid, B. M. title Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success . journal American Political Science Review volume 99 , pages 347--359 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  26. [35]

    & author Hunger, S

    author Gessler, T. & author Hunger, S. title How the refugee crisis and radical right parties shape party competition on immigration . journal Political Science Research and Methods volume 10 , pages 524--544 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  27. [36]

    & author Saldivia Gonzatti, D

    author V \"o lker, T. & author Saldivia Gonzatti, D. title Discourse networks of the far right: How far-right actors become mainstream in public debates . journal Political Communication volume 41 , pages 353--372 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  28. [37]

    author Renström, E. A. , author Bäck, H. & author Carroll, R. title Threats, Emotions, and Affective Polarization . journal Political Psychology volume 44 , pages 1337--1366 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  29. [38]

    title Affective polarization in multiparty systems

    author Wagner, M. title Affective polarization in multiparty systems . journal Electoral Studies volume 69 , pages 102199 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  30. [39]

    author Berning, C. C. title Alternative f \"u r D eutschland ( A f D )-- G ermany’s new radical right-wing populist party . journal ifo DICE Report volume 15 , pages 16--19 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  31. [40]

    , author Giebler, H

    author Lewandowsky, M. , author Giebler, H. & author Wagner, A. title Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland. Eine empirische Einordnung der Parteien zur Bundestagswahl 2013 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der AfD . journal Politische Vierteljahresschrift volume 57 , pages 247--275...

    2013

  32. [41]

    title German spy agency pauses `extremist' classification for A f D party pending court case ( year 2025 )

    author Reuters . title German spy agency pauses `extremist' classification for A f D party pending court case ( year 2025 ). ://www.reuters.com/world/europe/german-spy-agency-pauses-extremist-classification-afd-party-local-court-says-2025-05-08/

    2025

  33. [42]

    title DW captures attack on Green Party politician in Dresden ( year 2025 )

    author Deutsche Welle . title DW captures attack on Green Party politician in Dresden ( year 2025 ). ://www.dw.com/en/dw-captures-attack-on-green-party-politician-in-dresden/a-69029359

    2025

  34. [43]

    title in Extremismus und politisch motivierte gewalt im vereinten deutschland (ed

    author Backes, U. title in Extremismus und politisch motivierte gewalt im vereinten deutschland (ed. editor Enzmann, B. ) booktitle Handbuch Politische Gewalt pages 363--395 ( publisher Springer VS , address Wiesbaden , year 2013 )

    2013

  35. [44]

    title BKA - Politisch motivierte Kriminalität - Vorstellung der Fallzahlen zur Politisch motivierten Kriminalität 2023 ( year 2024 )

    author BKA . title BKA - Politisch motivierte Kriminalität - Vorstellung der Fallzahlen zur Politisch motivierten Kriminalität 2023 ( year 2024 ). ://www.bka.de/DE/UnsereAufgaben/Deliktsbereiche/PMK/PMKZahlen2023/PMKZahlen2023.html

    2023

  36. [45]

    title Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? explaining the emergence of a new party family

    author Rydgren, J. title Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? explaining the emergence of a new party family . journal European Journal of Political Research volume 44 , pages 413--437 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  37. [46]

    , author Pilet, J.-B

    author van de Wardt, M. , author Pilet, J.-B. , author Schumacher, G. & author van Witteloostuijn, A. title Contagion from abroad: How party entry in western europe is influenced by party family members abroad, 1961--2016 . journal Comparative Political Studies volume 57 ( year 2024 )

    1961

  38. [47]

    & author Soler-i Martí, R

    author Terren, L. & author Soler-i Martí, R. title “Glocal” and transversal engagement in youth social movements: A T witter-based case study of F ridays F or F uture- B arcelona . journal Frontiers in Political Science volume 3 , pages 635822 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  39. [48]

    author Barberá, P. et al. title Who leads? who follows? measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data . journal American Political Science Review volume 113 , pages 883--901 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  40. [49]

    , author Jetter, M

    author Lewandowsky, S. , author Jetter, M. & author Ecker, U. K. H. title Using the president’s tweets to understand political diversion in the age of social media . journal Nature Communications volume 11 , pages 5764 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  41. [50]

    , author Garg, R

    author Krijestorac, H. , author Garg, R. & author Mahajan, V. title Cross-platform spillover effects in consumption of viral content: A quasi-experimental analysis using synthetic controls . journal Information Systems Research volume 31 , pages 449--472 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  42. [51]

    author S \"a ltzer, M. et al. title T witter- A ccounts der K andidierenden zur B undestagswahl 2021 ( GLES ) ( year 2023 ). note Version 2.1.0, ZA7721 [Datensatz]

    2021

  43. [52]

    , author Bagci, M

    author Abrami, G. , author Bagci, M. , author Hammerla, L. & author Mehler, A. title German Parliamentary Corpus ( GerParCor ) , pages 1900--1906 ( publisher European Language Resources Association , year 2022 ). ://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.202/

    1900

  44. [53]

    , author Bagci, M

    author Abrami, G. , author Bagci, M. & author Mehler, A. title G erman parliamentary corpus ( G er P ar C or) reloaded , pages 7707--7716 ( publisher ELRA and ICCL , year 2024 ). ://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.681/

    2024

  45. [54]

    author Richter, F. et al. title Open discourse ( year 2020 ). ://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FIKIBO

    2020 doi

  46. [55]

    author Jolly, S. et al. title C hapel H ill E xpert S urvey trend file, 1999--2019 . journal Electoral Studies volume 75 , pages 102420 ( year 2022 )

    1999

  47. [56]

    title Dealing with the populist radical right in parliament: Mainstream party responses toward the A lternative for G ermany

    author Heinze, A.-S. title Dealing with the populist radical right in parliament: Mainstream party responses toward the A lternative for G ermany . journal European Political Science Review volume 14 , pages 333--350 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  48. [57]

    , author Kiess, J

    author Decker, O. , author Kiess, J. , author Heller, A. , author Schuler, J. & author Brähler, E. title Die Leipziger Autoritarismus Studie 2022: zentrale Ergebnisse . journal Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen volume 36 , pages 6--17 ( year 2023 )

    2022

  49. [58]

    o hmer, H. , author Diermeier, M. , author Mertens, A. & author Sommer, J. title S track- Z immermann schl\

    author B\" o hmer, H. , author Diermeier, M. , author Mertens, A. & author Sommer, J. title S track- Z immermann schl\" a gt A f D : Der T ik T ok- E uropawahlkampf . type IW-Kurzbericht number 33/2024 , address K\" o ln ( year 2024 ). ://hdl.handle.net/10419/299131

    2024

  50. [59]

    title Plenarprotokolle des D eutschen B undestages ( year 2025 )

    author Deutscher Bundestag . title Plenarprotokolle des D eutschen B undestages ( year 2025 ). ://dserver.bundestag.de/btp/

    2025

  51. [60]

    title BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure

    author Grootendorst, M. title BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure . journal arXiv (Cornell University) ( year 2022 ). ://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05794

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.