REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 82 references
$N$-Photon Amplitudes in EFT from Recursion Relations and Effective Vertices
T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read This paper establishes a recursion that builds every tree-level photon amplitude in any EFT of electromagnetism from local contact amplitudes, each a single weighted Hafnian.
desk verdict A serious new method for photon EFT amplitudes with a plausible but under-proven unconstrained-field reformulation. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing mechanism is the decomposition $F_\pm = f_\pm + \phi_\pm$ of the field strength together with the resulting contact Lagrangian $L_c[f_\pm]$. The $f_\pm$ fields carry the propagating mixed-helicity lines, while the $\phi_\pm$ fields have purely local propagators and are integrated out; the operators of $L_c$ are in one-to-one correspondence with the contact amplitudes, each of which evaluates to a weighted Hafnian because of the pairing structure of the EFT vertices.
What would settle it
Compute a specific 6-point helicity amplitude, say $A[5^+,1^-]$, in the generic EFT directly from Feynman rules and compare it order by order with the sewn Hafnian channel sum (5.9); any mismatch in the channel sum would show that the contact decomposition is incomplete.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
In the self-dual basis the photon only propagates through the mixed $+$/$-$ channel; the same-helicity propagators are local, so every amplitude factorizes into a web of local contact subamplitudes connected by $+$/$-$ lines. A contact subamplitude with $K$ positive and $N-K$ negative helicities is the weighted Hafnian $\widehat{\mathrm{Hf}}\big(\chi^{(N)}_K\big)$ of the angle/square bracket matrix, with the weight set by photon multiplicities. The contact Lagrangian obtained by integrating out the static $\phi^\pm$ fields contains one operator for each contact amplitude, and its coefficients are produced by a fixed-point iteration with a known stopping depth. For helicity-conserving theories the contact Lagrangian must be built from $(f_+^2 f_-^2)^P$ terms, which is exactly the statement of invariance under $f_\pm \to e^{\mp i\theta} f_\pm$; this yields the claimed equivalence between off-shell electromagnetic duality and helicity conservation. In Born-Infeld theory the contact Lagrangian resums in closed form by Lagrange inversion.
Load-bearing premise
The construction assumes that replacing the Bianchi-constrained fields by unconstrained $f_\pm,\phi_\pm$ and integrating out $\phi_\pm$ gives a contact Lagrangian that reproduces the original EFT exactly; if that equivalence fails, every sewn amplitude would miss the physics of the original theory.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- All 8-point tree amplitudes of the generic EFT of electromagnetism are determined by the displayed sums of Hafnian products over channels, with no Feynman-diagram bookkeeping.
- The 10-point Born-Infeld amplitude $A[5^+,5^-]$ is computed from 4-point contact blocks alone, since helicity conservation forbids all other 10-point amplitudes.
- For a fixed number of external photons only a finite, known number of contact amplitudes is needed; the stopping criterion $m_{\min} = \lfloor (N-2)/4 \rfloor$ bounds the required iteration depth.
- Helicity conservation and off-shell electromagnetic duality are equivalent for the general EFT, both at tree and loop level, because the contact Lagrangian takes the duality-invariant form if and only if no helicity-violating contact operator appears.
- The contact Lagrangian receives only tree-level contributions, so the recursion framework is not limited to tree order and can be used to organize higher-loop correlators.
Reading between the lines
- The same decomposition might be adapted to non-abelian gauge theories or gravity by replacing the scalar contact Lagrangian with a matrix-valued one, though the paper does not pursue that extension.
- Because the weighted Hafnian is a permanent-like sum over perfect matchings, the computational cost of generating contact amplitudes is combinatorial; for very large $N$ the recursion could require approximation or tensor-network methods, a limitation the paper does not discuss.
- The equivalence between duality and helicity conservation suggests that any UV completion preserving off-shell duality at the amplitude level must have a contact Lagrangian of the $(f_+^2 f_-^2)^P$ form, which could be tested by computing helicity-violating amplitudes in candidate completions.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper develops a recursive (CSW-like) method for tree-level N-photon helicity amplitudes in the general low-energy EFT of electromagnetism. It works in the self-dual basis, shows that the ±± field-strength propagators are contact terms while the +− propagator carries the pole, and uses the resulting diagrammatic substructure to decompose any amplitude into a web of local contact amplitudes joined by +− lines. Contact amplitudes are encoded in a weighted Hafnian formula (Eq. (4.22)) and in a 'contact Lagrangian' obtained by decomposing F± = f± + φ± and integrating out the non-propagating φ±. The paper derives the contact Lagrangian to O(F^14), proves (within its formalism) equivalence between off-shell electromagnetic duality and helicity conservation, resums the BI contact Lagrangian in closed form, and presents complete 6-pt and 8-pt generic EFT amplitudes and 10-pt BI amplitudes.
Significance. Should the unconstrained reformulation be valid, this is a substantial technical advance: it turns a combinatorial Feynman-diagram problem into a small set of Hafnians, provides compact closed-form BI results, and gives a simple proof of the duality/helicity-conservation equivalence. The paper includes explicit Feynman-rule cross-checks at 6 points (App. C) and agreement with the existing literature [70,76], which are genuine strengths. The central risk is the unproven path-integral equivalence in Sec. 6.1.1; because all higher-point results inherit from it, this needs to be established before the completeness claims can be accepted.
major comments (4)
- [Sec. 6.1.1, Eqs. (6.1)–(6.7)] The central equivalence between the Bianchi-constrained path integral (6.6) and the unconstrained f,φ path integral (6.7) is asserted rather than proven. The paper does not specify the integration measure over constrained F±, the reality properties of f± and φ±, or the Jacobian of the change of variables; if f and φ are independent complex fields, the field content is doubled relative to the real EFT, while if they are related by reality conditions the 'unconstrained' characterization is inaccurate. Since the contact Lagrangian (6.22), the BI resummation (7.17), and the 8- and 10-pt amplitudes of Sec. 8 all follow from this reformulation, a proof of equivalence—or at least a direct 8-pt Feynman-diagram comparison, where contact and sewn topologies first coexist—is required. The 6-pt checks in App. C are encouraging but do not settle this point.
- [Secs. 8.1 and 8.2, Eqs. (8.6)–(8.12)] The advertised 'complete' 8-pt and 10-pt amplitudes are written as topology sums in which the 'sum over channels' is not expanded, and the weighted Hafnian cHf involving off-shell internal momenta q is not explicitly defined (the off-shell spinor continuation is only sketched around Eq. (5.1)). As a result, no reader can verify that the channel sums are exhaustive or reproduce the displayed expressions. The authors should either expand the channel sums explicitly or provide a machine-readable ancillary file with the full expansions, together with the off-shell definition of cHf.
- [Sec. 7.3, Eqs. (7.8)–(7.10)] The bootstrap of the BI contact Lagrangian leaves a free parameter a, which is then set to a=1 to match Refs. [76,80]. No physical condition (e.g., reality, analyticity, or the absence of spurious singularities) is shown to select a=1, so the derivation is not self-contained: the final closed form (7.17) is in effect fitted to known results. The authors should either derive the value of a from a stated condition or explicitly present the a-family as an ansatz whose agreement with BI is verified a posteriori.
- [Sec. 6.1.3, Eq. (6.11)] The claim that all loop contributions to the contact Lagrangian vanish 'identically upon using dimensional regularization' is too terse to support the all-loop statements in Secs. 6.1.4 and 7.1. Loop integrals with only local propagators are polynomials in loop momenta, but the argument should spell out the scaleless-integral structure and clarify that f-loop contributions to scattering amplitudes are not being discarded.
minor comments (5)
- [Introduction, p. 4] The phrase 'A a CSW-like recursion' contains a typo and should read 'A CSW-like recursion'.
- [Eq. (7.8)] The displayed constraint appears garbled: binary operators are missing and there is a stray '−h−' in the second term; please re-typeset and re-check the equation.
- [Sec. 6.1.3] The statement that the source is chosen to have 'no constant component' should be made precise (e.g., J(q=0)=0 in momentum space), and its compatibility with the LSZ procedure should be stated.
- [App. E] The O(F^14) contact Lagrangian is listed without derivation; given its length, a generating script or ancillary file would aid reproducibility and reduce the risk of typographical errors in the coefficients.
- [Eq. (5.1) and Sec. 5.1.2] The notation [i|q|j⟩ should be accompanied by an explicit definition of the all-incoming momentum routing for the internal line q, including the sign convention used in the sewing formula.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the generic-EFT contact Lagrangian and Hafnian amplitudes are derived from the stated EFT Lagrangian by fixed-point iteration and cross-checked against Feynman rules; the only free calibration, a = 1, is an external match to prior literature, not a self-citation or a fitted prediction.
full rationale
The load-bearing derivation chain is: self-dual propagators (Sec. 3) give the Hafnian vertex formula (Sec. 4.3); Sec. 5 identifies the web of contact amplitudes connected by +- lines; Sec. 6 constructs the contact Lagrangian by introducing unconstrained fields f±, phi± and integrating out the local phi± fields; Sec. 8 then sews the contact amplitudes into 8-pt generic-EFT and 10-pt BI amplitudes. Each step is either an explicit algebraic identity or a computation from the stated EFT couplings. The contact-Lagrangian coefficients in (6.22) and App. E are nontrivial polynomial functions of the input kappa(N)_i obtained by fixed-point iteration, and the 6-pt amplitudes are independently verified in App. C using Lorentzian Feynman rules; the BI series (7.17) is checked against [76]. The reformulation F± = f± + phi± with <f phi> = 0 is introduced by definition, and the partition-function equivalence (6.7) is asserted rather than proved in detail; if the unconstrained measure missed Bianchi constraints or introduced spurious modes, the higher-point results would inherit the error, but this is a missing proof or correctness risk, not a circular reduction. The bootstrap parameter a is left free by the constraint (7.10) and set to 1 to match [76,80]; this is an external calibration, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and it does not affect the generic-EFT central results. No equation is exhibited as equivalent to its own input by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation appears; accordingly no circular step is identified.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- a (duality bootstrap parameter) =
1
assumptions (6)
- standard math Lorentz invariants of F in 4d reduce to polynomials in F and G
- standard math Spinor helicity identities (Schouten, Fierz, momentum conservation, phase conventions)
- domain assumption EFT restricted to lowest derivative order with parity invariance
- ad hoc to paper Unconstrained decomposition F± = f± + φ± with ⟨f φ⟩=0 correctly encodes the Bianchi-constrained dynamics
- standard math Loop integrals with no loop-momentum denominators vanish in dimensional regularization
- ad hoc to paper Ansatz h^2_+ = p_+(z_+) p_-(z_-) r(z_+ z_-) and z± as U(1) irreps
invented entities (1)
-
Auxiliary fields f± and φ±
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of $N$-Photon Amplitudes in EFT from Recursion Relations and Effective Vertices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JW4DJLBA
@misc{pith2026260805285,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: $N$-Photon Amplitudes in EFT from Recursion Relations and Effective Vertices},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JW4DJLBA}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05285}
}
abstract
We present a recursive framework for computing arbitrary tree-level helicity amplitudes in the general effective field theory (EFT) of electromagnetism. We show that photon amplitudes can be constructed using a CSW-like recursion, whose building blocks consist of purely local subamplitudes. For a fixed number of external legs, only a finite number of these contact amplitudes need to be computed, and these admit compact expressions in terms of Hafnians. We further show that the contact amplitudes are encoded in an effective contact Lagrangian, that can be computed systematically from the general EFT Lagrangian using a suitable generating functional. We provide this contact Lagrangian up to $N=14$ photons. We argue that the contact Lagrangian reveals the hidden simplicity of helicity-conserving amplitudes, providing a simple proof of the equivalence between off-shell electromagnetic duality and helicity conservation. We further show how to resum the contact Lagrangian of a helicity-conserving theory to all $N$, and illustrate the procedure for Born-Infeld (BI) electromagnetism. Building on these methods and results, we compute the complete 6-point and 8-point tree-level helicity amplitudes generated by generic EFT operators, and the tree amplitudes up to 10-point in BI electromagnetism.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[76]
Novotn´ y,Self-duality, helicity conservation and normal ordering in nonlinear QED,Phys
J. Novotn´ y,Self-duality, helicity conservation and normal ordering in nonlinear QED,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 085015 [1806.02167]
arXiv 2018
-
[1]
F. Cachazo, P. Svrcek and E. Witten,MHV vertices and tree amplitudes in gauge theory, JHEP09(2004) 006 [hep-th/0403047]
arXiv 2004
- [2]
- [3]
-
[4]
Berends and W.T
F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele,Recursive Calculations for Processes with n Gluons,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 759
1988
- [5]
- [6]
-
[7]
One-loop calculations in quantum field theory: from Feynman diagrams to unitarity cuts
R.K. Ellis, Z. Kunszt, K. Melnikov and G. Zanderighi,One-loop calculations in quantum field theory: from Feynman diagrams to unitarity cuts,Phys. Rept.518(2012) 141 [1105.4319]
work page Pith review arXiv 2012
Show all 82 references
- [8]
-
[9]
Dixon,A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Particle Physics: The Higgs Boson and Beyond, pp
L.J. Dixon,A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Particle Physics: The Higgs Boson and Beyond, pp. 31–67, 2014, DOI [1310.5353]
2014 arXiv
-
[10]
Cheung,TASI lectures on scattering amplitudes., inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics, pp
C. Cheung,TASI lectures on scattering amplitudes., inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics, pp. 571–623, 2018, DOI [1708.03872]
2018 arXiv
-
[11]
Feng and M
B. Feng and M. Luo,An Introduction to On-shell Recursion Relations,Front. Phys. (Beijing) 7(2012) 533 [1111.5759]
2012 arXiv
-
[12]
Georgiou, E.W.N
G. Georgiou, E.W.N. Glover and V.V. Khoze,Non-MHV tree amplitudes in gauge theory, JHEP07(2004) 048 [hep-th/0407027]
2004 arXiv
-
[13]
Georgiou and V.V
G. Georgiou and V.V. Khoze,Tree amplitudes in gauge theory as scalar MHV diagrams, JHEP05(2004) 070 [hep-th/0404072]
2004 arXiv
-
[14]
Bern, L.J
Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower,The last of the finite loop amplitudes in QCD,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 125003 [hep-ph/0505055]
2005 arXiv
-
[15]
Bern, L.J
Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower,Bootstrapping multi-parton loop amplitudes in QCD, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 065013 [hep-ph/0507005]
2006 arXiv
-
[16]
Berger, Z
C.F. Berger, Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D. Forde and D.A. Kosower,All One-loop Maximally Helicity Violating Gluonic Amplitudes in QCD,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 016006 [hep-ph/0607014]
2007 arXiv
-
[17]
Bern, L.J
Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower,On-Shell Methods in Perturbative QCD,Annals Phys.322(2007) 1587 [0704.2798]
2007 arXiv
-
[18]
Britto, E
R. Britto, E. Buchbinder, F. Cachazo and B. Feng,One-loop amplitudes of gluons in SQCD, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 065012 [hep-ph/0503132]
2005 arXiv
-
[19]
Drummond and J.M
J.M. Drummond and J.M. Henn,All tree-level amplitudes in N=4 SYM,JHEP04(2009) 018 [0808.2475]
2009 arXiv
-
[20]
Bjerrum-Bohr, D.C
N.E.J. Bjerrum-Bohr, D.C. Dunbar, H. Ita, W.B. Perkins and K. Risager,MHV-vertices for gravity amplitudes,JHEP01(2006) 009 [hep-th/0509016]
2006 arXiv
-
[21]
Bjerrum-Bohr, J.F
N.E.J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J.F. Donoghue and P. Vanhove,On-shell Techniques and Universal Results in Quantum Gravity,JHEP02(2014) 111 [1309.0804]
2014 arXiv
-
[22]
Berger, V
C.F. Berger, V. Del Duca and L.J. Dixon,Recursive Construction of Higgs-Plus-Multiparton Loop Amplitudes: The Last of the Phi-nite Loop Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 094021 [hep-ph/0608180]. 57
2006 arXiv
-
[23]
Badger, E.W
S. Badger, E.W. Nigel Glover, P. Mastrolia and C. Williams,One-loop Higgs plus four gluon amplitudes: Full analytic results,JHEP01(2010) 036 [0909.4475]
2010 arXiv
-
[24]
Benincasa and F
P. Benincasa and F. Cachazo,Consistency Conditions on the S-Matrix of Massless Particles, 0705.4305
-
[25]
Schuster and N
P.C. Schuster and N. Toro,Constructing the Tree-Level Yang-Mills S-Matrix Using Complex Factorization,JHEP06(2009) 079 [0811.3207]
2009 arXiv
-
[26]
Cohen, H
T. Cohen, H. Elvang and M. Kiermaier,On-shell constructibility of tree amplitudes in general field theories,JHEP04(2011) 053 [1010.0257]
2011 arXiv
-
[27]
Franken and C
R. Franken and C. Schwinn,On-shell constructibility of Born amplitudes in spontaneously broken gauge theories,JHEP02(2020) 073 [1910.13407]
2020 arXiv
-
[28]
Cheung, C.-H
C. Cheung, C.-H. Shen and J. Trnka,Simple Recursion Relations for General Field Theories, JHEP06(2015) 118 [1502.05057]
2015 arXiv
-
[29]
Arkani-Hamed, T.-C
N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,JHEP11(2021) 070 [1709.04891]
2021 arXiv
-
[30]
Bianchi, H
M. Bianchi, H. Elvang and D.Z. Freedman,Generating Tree Amplitudes in N=4 SYM and N = 8 SG,JHEP09(2008) 063 [0805.0757]
2008 arXiv
-
[31]
Cheung, K
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen and J. Trnka,On-Shell Recursion Relations for Effective Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 041601 [1509.03309]
2016 arXiv
-
[32]
Cachazo, P
F. Cachazo, P. Cha and S. Mizera,Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits,JHEP06(2016) 170 [1604.03893]
2016 arXiv
-
[33]
Bianchi, A.L
M. Bianchi, A.L. Guerrieri, Y.-t. Huang, C.-J. Lee and C. Wen,Exploring soft constraints on effective actions,JHEP10(2016) 036 [1605.08697]
2016 arXiv
-
[34]
Cheung, K
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen and J. Trnka,A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories,JHEP02(2017) 020 [1611.03137]
2017 arXiv
-
[35]
Padilla, D
A. Padilla, D. Stefanyszyn and T. Wilson,Probing Scalar Effective Field Theories with the Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP04(2017) 015 [1612.04283]
2017 arXiv
-
[36]
Rodina,Uniqueness from gauge invariance and the Adler zero,JHEP09(2019) 084 [1612.06342]
L. Rodina,Uniqueness from gauge invariance and the Adler zero,JHEP09(2019) 084 [1612.06342]
2019 arXiv
-
[37]
Rodina,Scattering Amplitudes from Soft Theorems and Infrared Behavior,Phys
L. Rodina,Scattering Amplitudes from Soft Theorems and Infrared Behavior,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 071601 [1807.09738]
2019 arXiv
-
[38]
Carrillo Gonz´ alez, R
M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez, R. Penco and M. Trodden,Shift symmetries, soft limits, and the double copy beyond leading order,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 105011 [1908.07531]
2020 arXiv
-
[39]
Kampf, J
K. Kampf, J. Novotny, M. Shifman and J. Trnka,New Soft Theorems for Goldstone Boson Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 111601 [1910.04766]
2020 arXiv
-
[40]
Brauner, A
T. Brauner, A. Esposito and R. Penco,Fractional Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 231601 [2203.00022]
2022 arXiv
-
[41]
Low, M.-L
I. Low, M.-L. Xiao and Y.-H. Zheng,Gauged soft recursion: on-shell construction of Goldstone-gauge amplitudes,JHEP02(2026) 208 [2511.09403]
2026
-
[42]
Cheung, K
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen, J. Trnka and C. Wen,Vector Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 261602 [1801.01496]. 58
2018 arXiv
-
[43]
Kampf, J
K. Kampf, J. Novotny, F. Preucil and J. Trnka,Multi-spin soft bootstrap and scalar-vector Galileon,JHEP07(2021) 153 [2104.10693]
2021 arXiv
-
[44]
Kampf, J
K. Kampf, J. Novotny and P. Vasko,Extended DBI and its generalizations from graded soft theorems,JHEP10(2021) 101 [2107.04587]
2021 arXiv
-
[45]
Fu, Y.-J
C.-H. Fu, Y.-J. Du, R. Huang and B. Feng,Expansion of Einstein-Yang-Mills Amplitude, JHEP09(2017) 021 [1702.08158]
2017 arXiv
-
[46]
Low and Z
I. Low and Z. Yin,Soft Bootstrap and Effective Field Theories,JHEP11(2019) 078 [1904.12859]
2019 arXiv
-
[47]
Aoude and C.S
R. Aoude and C.S. Machado,The Rise of SMEFT On-shell Amplitudes,JHEP12(2019) 058 [1905.11433]
2019 arXiv
-
[48]
Durieux, T
G. Durieux, T. Kitahara, Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss,The electroweak effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes,JHEP01(2020) 119 [1909.10551]
2020 arXiv
-
[49]
Gu and L.-T
J. Gu and L.-T. Wang,Sum Rules in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory from Helicity Amplitudes,JHEP03(2021) 149 [2008.07551]
2021 arXiv
-
[50]
Elias Mir´ o, J
J. Elias Mir´ o, J. Ingoldby and M. Riembau,EFT anomalous dimensions from the S-matrix, JHEP09(2020) 163 [2005.06983]
2020 arXiv
-
[51]
Baratella, C
P. Baratella, C. Fernandez and A. Pomarol,Renormalization of Higher-Dimensional Operators from On-shell Amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B959(2020) 115155 [2005.07129]
2020 arXiv
-
[52]
Balkin, G
R. Balkin, G. Durieux, T. Kitahara, Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss,On-shell Higgsing for EFTs, JHEP03(2022) 129 [2112.09688]
2022 arXiv
-
[53]
Baratella, D
P. Baratella, D. Haslehner, M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra and A. Weiler,RG of GR from on-shell amplitudes,JHEP03(2022) 156 [2109.06191]
2022 arXiv
-
[54]
Aoude, K
R. Aoude, K. Haddad and A. Helset,On-shell heavy particle effective theories,JHEP05 (2020) 051 [2001.09164]
2020 arXiv
-
[55]
Accettulli Huber and S
M. Accettulli Huber and S. De Angelis,Standard Model EFTs via on-shell methods,JHEP 11(2021) 221 [2108.03669]
2021 arXiv
-
[56]
H. Liu, T. Ma, Y. Shadmi and M. Waterbury,An EFT hunter’s guide to two-to-two scattering: HEFT and SMEFT on-shell amplitudes,JHEP05(2023) 241 [2301.11349]
2023 arXiv
-
[57]
De Angelis,Amplitude bases in generic EFTs,JHEP08(2022) 299 [2202.02681]
S. De Angelis,Amplitude bases in generic EFTs,JHEP08(2022) 299 [2202.02681]
2022 arXiv
-
[58]
Goldberg, H
J.M. Goldberg, H. Liu and Y. Shadmi,Dimension-8 SMEFT contact-terms for vector-pair production via on-shell Higgsing,JHEP12(2024) 057 [2407.07945]
2024 arXiv
-
[59]
Zhou,Can Locality, Unitarity, and Hidden Zeros Completely Determine Tree-Level Amplitudes?,2604.07195
K. Zhou,Can Locality, Unitarity, and Hidden Zeros Completely Determine Tree-Level Amplitudes?,2604.07195
-
[60]
Parke and T.R
S.J. Parke and T.R. Taylor,An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.56 (1986) 2459
1986
-
[61]
Mansfield,The Lagrangian origin of MHV rules,JHEP03(2006) 037 [hep-th/0511264]
P. Mansfield,The Lagrangian origin of MHV rules,JHEP03(2006) 037 [hep-th/0511264]
2006 arXiv
-
[62]
Gorsky and A
A. Gorsky and A. Rosly,From Yang-Mills Lagrangian to MHV diagrams,JHEP01(2006) 101 [hep-th/0510111]
2006 arXiv
-
[63]
Ettle and T.R
J.H. Ettle and T.R. Morris,Structure of the MHV-rules Lagrangian,JHEP08(2006) 003 [hep-th/0605121]. 59
2006 arXiv
-
[64]
Escobar and L.F
C.A. Escobar and L.F. Urrutia,Invariants of the electromagnetic field,J. Math. Phys.55 (2014) 032902 [1309.4185]
2014 arXiv
-
[65]
Dunne,The Heisenberg-Euler Effective Action: 75 years on,Int
G.V. Dunne,The Heisenberg-Euler Effective Action: 75 years on,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A27 (2012) 1260004 [1202.1557]
2012 arXiv
-
[66]
Born and L
M. Born and L. Infeld,Foundations of the new field theory,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A144 (1934) 425
1934
-
[67]
Fradkin and A.A
E.S. Fradkin and A.A. Tseytlin,Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings,Phys. Lett. B163(1985) 123
1985
-
[68]
Bagger and A
J. Bagger and A. Galperin,A New Goldstone multiplet for partially broken supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 1091 [hep-th/9608177]
1997 arXiv
-
[69]
Boels, K.J
R. Boels, K.J. Larsen, N.A. Obers and M. Vonk,MHV, CSW and BCFW: Field theory structures in string theory amplitudes,JHEP11(2008) 015 [0808.2598]
2008 arXiv
-
[70]
Martin, C
L.C. Martin, C. Schubert and V.M. Villanueva Sandoval,On the low-energy limit of the QED N photon amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B668(2003) 335 [hep-th/0301022]
2003 arXiv
-
[71]
Hamilton, R
C.S. Hamilton, R. Kruse, L. Sansoni, S. Barkhofen, C. Silberhorn and I. Jex,Gaussian Boson Sampling,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 170501 [1612.01199]
2017 arXiv
-
[72]
Br´ adler, P.-L
K. Br´ adler, P.-L. Dallaire-Demers, P. Rebentrost, D. Su and C. Weedbrook,Gaussian boson sampling for perfect matchings of arbitrary graphs,Phys. Rev. A98(2018) 032310 [1712.06729]
2018 arXiv
-
[73]
Barvinok,Combinatorics and Complexity of Partition Functions, Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-51829-9
A. Barvinok,Combinatorics and Complexity of Partition Functions, Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-51829-9
2017 doi
-
[74]
Hussain and G
F. Hussain and G. Thompson,An Introduction to the heavy quark effective theory, inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 0045–115, 6, 1994 [hep-ph/9502241]
1994 arXiv
-
[75]
Goldberger and I.Z
W.D. Goldberger and I.Z. Rothstein,An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]
2006 arXiv
-
[77]
Quantum Field Theory II
D. Skinner, “Quantum Field Theory II.” https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/dbs26/AQFT.html
-
[78]
Rosly and K.G
A.A. Rosly and K.G. Selivanov,Helicity conservation in Born-Infeld theory, inWorkshop on String Theory and Complex Geometry, 4, 2002 [hep-th/0204229]
2002 arXiv
-
[79]
Bellucci, E
S. Bellucci, E. Ivanov and S. Krivonos,Superworldvolume dynamics of superbranes from nonlinear realizations,Phys. Lett. B482(2000) 233 [hep-th/0003273]
2000 arXiv
-
[80]
Ferrara, A
S. Ferrara, A. Sagnotti and A. Yeranyan,Two-field Born–Infeld with diverse dualities,Nucl. Phys. B912(2016) 305 [1602.04566]
2016 arXiv
-
[81]
Whittaker and G.N
E.T. Whittaker and G.N. Watson,A Course of Modern Analysis, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, 4 ed. (1996)
1996
-
[82]
Wilf,Generatingfunctionology, A
H.S. Wilf,Generatingfunctionology, A. K. Peters, Ltd., USA (2006). 60
2006
Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.