Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 193 references

Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) Model: A Computational Account of What Makes Design Options Worth Trying

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the value of trying a design option is the expected reduction of uncertainty about action–outcome relations, that this value peaks at moderate generalizability, and that it grows with how distinguishable outcomes are.

desk verdict A careful translation of active-inference epistemic value into design exploration, with solid simulations and experiments; the empirical validation of the B-EUR mechanism is weakened by an unvalidated rating measure and a self-referential simulation, but the paper deserves serious peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05642 v1 pith:FX4VD7UQ submitted 2026-08-06 cs.AI

Shimon Honda , Takuma Miyaguchi , Koji Koizumi , Takanori Sano , Tristan Briard , Hideyoshi Yanagisawa This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords B-EURmodeldesignexplorationepistemicvalueexpecteduncertaintyreductionGaussianprocessgeneralizabilityoutcomediscriminabilityinverted-Urelationship
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes the B-EUR model, in which the value of trying a design action is defined as the expected reduction of uncertainty about the relationship between actions and outcomes. The model predicts an inverted-U relationship between that value and generalizability: trials are most informative when knowledge from one trial extends to nearby options, but not so much that trials become redundant. It also predicts that value rises when outcome differences are easier to distinguish. Simulations confirm both predictions, and human experiments confirm the inverted-U in ratings of value and enjoyment and in choices, while outcome discriminability appears in perceived uncertainty and choices. If correct, the model explains why some explorations feel worth pursuing and gives concrete guidance for choosing prototypes, framing problems, and collecting feedback.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the B-EUR epistemic value $V_{\mathrm{epi}}(u_t)=I(B_t; s_{t+1}\mid u_t)$, the mutual information between the belief $q(B_t)$ about the action–outcome mapping and the next observed state $s_{t+1}$ given action $u_t$. In words, it is how much the learner expects one trial to shrink its uncertainty about that mapping. The environment is generated as a Gaussian process with an RBF (smooth Gaussian) kernel $k(u,u')=\sigma^2\exp(-(u-u')^2/2l^2)$, where the correlation length $l$ operationalizes generalizability and the amplitude $\sigma$ operationalizes outcome discriminability. Observations update beliefs with Gaussian weights whose width is proportional to $l$, so each trial informs neighboring candidate points. This machinery ties one information-theoretic quantity to the two environmental knobs and produces the inverted-U and monotonic predictions tested in humans.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be to fit the B-EUR model's predicted $V_{\mathrm{epi}}(u_t)$ to each participant's trial-by-trial value-of-trying ratings; if the ratings do not track those predictions once the main effects of $l$, $l^2$, and $\sigma$ are controlled, or if visual features of the graph predict the ratings better, the claim that subjective value is expected uncertainty reduction fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that epistemic value—the worth of trying a candidate design action—is the mutual information between the agent's current belief about the action–outcome mapping and the observation that action would produce. On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that this quantity has a clear inverted-U dependence on generalizability: it is low when observations fail to transfer to neighboring candidates and low again when a few observations exhaust what can be learned, with a maximum at intermediate correlation length. In simulations, the same quantity increases with outcome discriminability because wider output ranges leave more room for learning. In the human graph-shape guessing task, subjective value of trying and enjoyment follow the predicted inverted-U with generalizability, and participants more often choose conditions with intermediate generalizability and larger outcome discriminability; the outcome-discriminability effect appears in choices but not in absolute ratings, which the authors attribute to participants evaluating one graph at a time.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on taking participants' answer to 'How valuable do you feel it is to know the value of this point?' as a direct measure of expected uncertainty reduction; if that rating tracks visual appeal, perceived difficulty, or curiosity instead, the human confirmation of the inverted-U would not test the model's mechanism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Trials are most informative when knowledge generalizes moderately; too little generalization isolates each trial and too much makes observations redundant.
  • Subjective value of trying, enjoyment, and choice probability should all peak at intermediate generalizability; the human experiments report this pattern for value, enjoyment, and choices.
  • Outcome discriminability raises expected uncertainty reduction in simulations, and people prefer more discriminable exploration conditions when they can compare them; this supports using feedback formats that make outcome differences salient.
  • The value of trying decays across observations, and the decay is faster in high-generalizability environments, meaning exploration should concentrate early trials in smooth, easily learned spaces.
  • For design practice, prototype sets should differ along one element with moderate generalizability, problem framing should keep the search space neither too narrow nor too broad, and evaluations should use multiple dimensions to keep outcomes distinguishable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: the optimal correlation length should shrink as the trial budget grows, because high-generalizability environments exhaust their learning value quickly, so tasks with more than ten observations should show an inverted-U peak at lower $l$.
  • A testable consequence of the rating-versus-choice discrepancy: making outcome discriminability explicit, such as by showing graphs side by side or asking how different outcomes could be, should restore an amplitude effect in subjective ratings, suggesting the paper's null $\sigma$ ratings reflect framing rather than the mechanism.
  • The same mutual-information machinery should govern exploration beyond design, so a smoothness-manipulated bandit or information-foraging task should reproduce the inverted-U; this is a generality claim the paper does not test.
  • Because the model assumes the learner's update width scales with the environmental correlation length, an individual-differences variant could estimate each person's internal generalization width and predict that wider internal widths shift preferred environments toward higher $l$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) model, which formalizes the value of trying a design action as the expected mutual information between the action-outcome mapping and the predicted observation (Eq. 3). Using a graph-shape guessing task with Gaussian-process environments, the authors simulate how epistemic value depends on correlation length l (generalizability) and amplitude sigma (outcome discriminability), predicting an inverted-U in l and a monotonic increase in sigma. Two human experiments test these predictions: Experiment 1 measures perceived uncertainty, subjective value of trying, and enjoyment; Experiment 2 measures choice among eight graph conditions. The human data support the inverted-U relationship with l for value of trying, enjoyment, and choice probability, and the sigma effect appears in perceived uncertainty and choice behavior, but not in the subjective value-of-trying or enjoyment ratings. The paper discusses implications for prototyping, problem framing, and design management, and acknowledges limitations concerning task abstraction and the exclusion of pragmatic value.

Significance. If the empirical validation holds, the paper offers a useful computational articulation of one mechanism in the UDA framework, connecting active-inference epistemic value to design exploration. The strengths include a clearly specified model, explicit simulation-to-hypothesis mapping, a self-contained abstract task, and apparent availability of code and data in a repository. The inverted-U relationship with generalizability is internally consistent and independently supported in both ratings and choice behavior, which is a meaningful addition to design-research accounts of exploration. However, the central experimental confirmation of the B-EUR mechanism depends on an unvalidated rating measure, and the sigma-effect predictions fail in the key rating data; the current manuscript therefore falls short of establishing that the human behavior is driven by expected uncertainty reduction rather than by a more general preference for intermediate complexity or visual salience.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1.4 and Section 3.2.1] The main empirical test of the B-EUR mechanism rests on the 'value of trying' rating as a subjective indicator of V_epi (Eq. 3), but the paper provides no validation that this rating actually tracks the model's trial-level mutual information. The model generates trial-level predictions for V_epi(u_t) under the participant's evolving belief state, and the experiment collects a rating at each step, yet the analyses aggregate over steps and conditions and test only ordinal hypotheses. This gap is load-bearing because the model's sigma prediction S3 directly fails in the rating data: H2-1 is not supported (beta = -0.030, SE = 0.054, p = .572), even though Figure 3(B) shows that sigma raises V_epi across the full l range used in Experiment 1. The Section 4.4 explanation that 'effects of l dominated' is post hoc and does not follow from the model. A trial-level analysis of ratings against model-derived V_epi values, or a pre-registered alternative validation of the rating measure, is necessary before the experiments can be said to confirm the B-EUR mechanism rather than a generic preference for intermediate complexity.
  2. [Appendix A, Table 4] The simulation's environmental l manipulation is partially confounded with the agent's learning kernel through the setting l_model = beta * l. Because the agent is given the environmental smoothness in its own Gaussian-weighted update rule, the simulation's inverted-U relationship between l and V_epi (S2, Figure 3(B)) may be a built-in consequence of the update-width calibration rather than an emergent property of the task environment alone. To make the simulation claim robust, the authors should report a mismatch analysis, for example fixing l_model while varying l, or estimating l_model from the observed rating data. The human inverted-U remains informative, but the current simulation setup overstates the independence of the prediction from the model's own assumptions.
  3. [Section 3.1.4 and Section 3.2.2] The choice experiment (Experiment 2) presents examples of all eight graph conditions simultaneously and asks participants to select the one that 'looks most enjoyable.' The observed sigma effect on choice probability (H4-1: beta = 1.035, p < .001) may therefore reflect visual amplitude salience or hedonic preference rather than expected uncertainty reduction, and it is not a process-level measure of V_epi. The Discussion (Section 4.4) itself suggests that sigma became more 'salient' when conditions were compared at once, which is consistent with this alternative explanation. A manipulation that decouples amplitude salience from epistemic value, or a model-based choice analysis using the participant's inferred belief state, is needed before H4-1 can be interpreted as support for S3.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2, Figure 3(D)] The relationship between prior entropy H[q(B_t)] and V_epi is described as an inverted-U but is only shown graphically; no statistical test or fitted curve is reported for this claim, despite it being presented as a standalone simulation result.
  2. [Section 2.1.3 and Appendix A] The free parameters beta, Delta, eta, gamma, and alpha0 are listed in Table 4, but the paper does not justify their values or report sensitivity analyses. In particular, the discretization width Delta and the update-scale eta directly affect the computed V_epi magnitudes and the decay rates.
  3. [Section 2.1.1] The Gaussian-process setup is cited to Angel Deborah et al. (2021) and Han et al. (2012), which are not standard references for GP regression; a canonical textbook or methodological reference would be more appropriate.
  4. [Section 3.2.1] In the analysis of H2-3/H2-4, the variable name 'rep c' appears in the interaction notation; this should be defined or renamed to avoid confusion with 'repetition' across sessions.
  5. [Supplementary materials] The repository link is indicated as 'an online repository' but no URL or DOI is provided; the reproducibility claim cannot be verified in the current manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the B-EUR model's simulation predictions are computed consequences of the stated generative model and mutual-information objective, and the human experiments are independent; the few self-citations are background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Eq. (3) defines epistemic value as mutual information following standard active inference; S2-S4 are quantitative outputs of the simulation, not imposed assumptions. The inverted-U with l and the increase with sigma are computed from the GP prior and the mutual-information objective; they are not inserted as hypotheses and could in principle have had other shapes. The auxiliary assumption l_model = beta*l (Appendix A) states that the agent's Gaussian belief-update width is proportional to the environmental correlation length. This is a stated modeling choice (an ideal-observer prior matched to the environment), not a fitted parameter, and it does not by itself determine the inverted-U; the functional form of V_epi(l) is a nontrivial computational result. Human experiments are independent of the model: no model parameters are fit to ratings or choices, and the rating question is an unvalidated proxy but not defined as the model output by construction. Indeed H2-1 (sigma effect on ratings) failed, showing the experiments can disconfirm model predictions. Self-citations (Yanagisawa and Honda, 2025; Honda et al., 2022) appear in background sections for epistemic-emotion valence and prior design applications, but the central premise is grounded in external active-inference references (Friston et al., 2015; Parr and Friston, 2017) and is not justified solely by self-citation. No circular step of any of the enumerated kinds can be exhibited with a specific reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on hand-set simulation parameters, on the assumption that the agent's internal generalization kernel matches the environment's correlation length, and on the assumed link between self-reported value of trying and expected information gain. The human data provide independent grounding for the l effect but not for the sigma effects in ratings.

free parameters (5)
  • beta (update-width multiplier) = 3.0
    Converts environmental correlation length l to the agent's internal Gaussian update width l_model = beta * l (Appendix A, Table 4). The simulation's relationship between epistemic value and l depends on this hand-chosen scaling.
  • Delta (output discretization width) = 0.3
    Bins output values into states; affects the entropy and information gain computed in V_epi (Appendix A, Table 4).
  • eta (belief update scale) = 1.0
    Controls how strongly observations update the Dirichlet belief B (Appendix A, Table 4).
  • gamma (softmax inverse temperature) = 1.0
    Action selection temperature in simulations (Appendix A, Table 4).
  • alpha0 (Dirichlet prior concentration) = 0.5
    Initial concentration of the belief over the mapping (Appendix A, Table 4).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The agent's posterior over the action-outcome mapping is updated with a Gaussian kernel whose width is proportional to the true environmental correlation length l (l_model = beta * l).
    Invoked in Section 2.1.2 and Appendix A; the simulation predictions S2-S4 depend on the learner's internal model matching the environment's smoothness.
  • domain assumption Epistemic value for a design action equals the expected reduction in entropy of the belief over the full action-outcome mapping (mutual information), following active inference.
    Section 2.1.2, Equation (3); this is a modeling assumption derived from active inference, not derived within the paper.
  • domain assumption A Gaussian process with RBF kernel adequately represents real design action-outcome relations in the experiment (one-dimensional abstraction).
    Section 2.1.1; the generality of the findings beyond one-dimensional GP graphs is assumed.
  • domain assumption Self-reports of value of trying and enjoyment track epistemic value.
    Section 3.1.4 and 3.1.5; experimental hypotheses map these ratings to V_epi.
  • standard math Standard linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models with participant random effects are appropriate for the repeated-measures data.
    Section 3.1.6 describes the statistical approach using lme4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) Model: A Computational Account of What Makes Design Options Worth Trying." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FX4VD7UQ

@misc{pith2026260805642,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) Model: A Computational Account of What Makes Design Options Worth Trying},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FX4VD7UQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05642}
}
read the original abstract

This paper proposes the Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) model, which formalizes the value of trying a candidate design action as its expected reduction of epistemic uncertainty about action--outcome relations. The model addresses one part of the Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model's open question concerning how changes in uncertainty perception determine action selection. We examine two environmental properties: generalizability, or how far knowledge from one trial extends to neighboring candidates, and outcome discriminability, or how clearly differences among outcomes can be distinguished. We tested the model through simulations and human experiments using a graph-shape guessing task that isolates learning about action--outcome relations under a limited trial budget. Epistemic value followed an inverted-U-shaped relationship with generalizability and increased with outcome discriminability in the simulations. In the human experiments, the subjective value of trying and enjoyment followed inverted-U-shaped relationships with generalizability, while choice behavior reflected both properties. The B-EUR model provides a computational account of candidate-action evaluation within uncertainty-driven design activity and offers implications for constructing prototype sets, framing design problems, and organizing feedback to support informative exploration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05642 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the Graph-Shape Guessing Game. Participants estimated the overall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Conceptual diagram of the B-EUR model. We designed this figure with reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simulation results. (A) Time-averaged prior entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temporal change in epistemic value. We fixed amplitude at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of stimulus conditions used in the Graph-Shape Guessing Game. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental procedure and screen transitions within each session. (A) Screen tran [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results of subjective ratings in Experiment 1. (A) Time-averaged perceived uncer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Choice frequency distribution for each condition in Experiment 2. Participants more [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

193 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Humans monitor learning progress in curiosity-driven exploration , url=

    Ten, Alexandr and Kaushik, Pramod and Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves and Gottlieb, Jacqueline , year=. Humans monitor learning progress in curiosity-driven exploration , url=. doi:10.31234/osf.io/d4wat , journal=

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/d4wat

  2. [2]

    and Hunnius, Sabine , year=

    Poli, Francesco and Meyer, Marlene and Mars, Rogier B. and Hunnius, Sabine , year=. Contributions of expected learning progress and perceptual novelty to curiosity-driven exploration , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105119 , journal=

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    and Mars, Rogier B

    Poli, Francesco and O’Reilly, Jill X. and Mars, Rogier B. and Hunnius, Sabine , year=. Curiosity and the dynamics of optimal exploration , volume=. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.001 , number=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.001 2024

  4. [4]

    Active inference and epistemic value , volume=

    Friston, Karl and Rigoli, Francesco and Ognibene, Dimitri and Mathys, Christoph and Fitzgerald, Thomas and Pezzulo, Giovanni , year=. Active inference and epistemic value , volume=. Cognitive Neuroscience , publisher=. doi:10.1080/17588928.2015.1020053 , number=

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    and Lin, Marco and Frith, Christopher D

    Friston, Karl J. and Lin, Marco and Frith, Christopher D. and Pezzulo, Giovanni and Hobson, J. Allan and Ondobaka, Sasha , year=. Active Inference, Curiosity and Insight , volume=. Neural Computation , publisher=. doi:10.1162/neco_a_00999 , number=

    doi:10.1162/neco_a_00999

  6. [6]

    Computational mechanisms of curiosity and goal-directed exploration , volume=

    Schwartenbeck, Philipp and Passecker, Johannes and Hauser, Tobias U and FitzGerald, Thomas HB and Kronbichler, Martin and Friston, Karl J , year=. Computational mechanisms of curiosity and goal-directed exploration , volume=. doi:10.7554/elife.41703 , journal=

    doi:10.7554/elife.41703

  7. [7]

    Parr, Thomas and Friston, Karl J. , year=. Uncertainty, epistemics and active inference , volume=. Journal of The Royal Society Interface , publisher=. doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0376 , number=

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Modeling the arousal potential of epistemic emotions using Bayesian information gain: a framework for inquiry cycles driven by free energy fluctuations , volume=

    Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi and Honda, Shimon , year=. Modeling the arousal potential of epistemic emotions using Bayesian information gain: a framework for inquiry cycles driven by free energy fluctuations , volume=. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1438080 , journal=

    arXiv

Show all 193 references
  1. [9]

    Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration Without Harm From Observational Noise: A Simulation Study Based on the Free Energy Principle , volume=

    Tinker, Theodore Jerome and Doya, Kenji and Tani, Jun , year=. Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration Without Harm From Observational Noise: A Simulation Study Based on the Free Energy Principle , volume=. Neural Computation , publisher=. doi:10.1162/neco_a_01690 , number=

    doi

  2. [10]

    Singh, Aditya and Manjaly, Jaison A. , year=. The effect of information gap and uncertainty on curiosity and its resolution , volume=. Journal of Cognitive Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1080/20445911.2021.1908311 , number=

    2021

  3. [11]

    Dubey, Rachit and Griffiths, Thomas L. , year=. Reconciling novelty and complexity through a rational analysis of curiosity. , volume=. Psychological Review , publisher=. doi:10.1037/rev0000175 , number=

    doi

  4. [12]

    and Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves and Gottlieb, Jacqueline , year=

    Baranes, Adrien F. and Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves and Gottlieb, Jacqueline , year=. The effects of task difficulty, novelty and the size of the search space on intrinsically motivated exploration , volume=. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00317 , journal=

    2014

  5. [13]

    Ann Renninger, K. , year=. Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation , ISBN=. doi:10.1016/b978-012619070-0/50035-0 , booktitle=

    doi

  6. [14]

    and Ryan, Richard M

    Di Domenico, Stefano I. and Ryan, Richard M. , year=. The Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research , volume=. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145 , journal=

    2017

  7. [15]

    Bono, Roser and Alarcón, Rafael and Blanca, María J. , year=. Report Quality of Generalized Linear Mixed Models in Psychology: A Systematic Review , volume=. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666182 , journal=

    2021

  8. [16]

    Data Analysis and Power Simulations with General Linear Mixed Modelling for Psychophysical Data – A Practical, R-Based Guide , url=

    Jörges, Björn , year=. Data Analysis and Power Simulations with General Linear Mixed Modelling for Psychophysical Data – A Practical, R-Based Guide , url=. doi:10.31234/osf.io/ack8u , publisher=

    doi

  9. [17]

    Meteyard, Lotte and Davies, Robert A.I. , year=. Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092 , journal=

    2020

  10. [18]

    Active Continual Learning: On Balancing Knowledge Retention and Learnability , ISBN=

    Vu, Thuy-Trang and Khadivi, Shahram and Ghorbanali, Mahsa and Phung, Dinh and Haffari, Gholamreza , year=. Active Continual Learning: On Balancing Knowledge Retention and Learnability , ISBN=. doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0351-0_10 , booktitle=

    doi

  11. [19]

    and Schulz, Eric and Speekenbrink, Maarten and Nelson, Jonathan D

    Wu, Charley M. and Schulz, Eric and Speekenbrink, Maarten and Nelson, Jonathan D. and Meder, Björn , year=. Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spaces , volume=. Nature Human Behaviour , publisher=. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0467-4 , number=

    doi

  12. [20]

    and Gershman, Samuel J

    Schulz, Eric and Franklin, Nicholas T. and Gershman, Samuel J. , year=. Finding structure in multi-armed bandits , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101261 , journal=

    2019

  13. [21]

    Reward Maximization Through Discrete Active Inference , volume=

    Da Costa, Lancelot and Sajid, Noor and Parr, Thomas and Friston, Karl and Smith, Ryan , year=. Reward Maximization Through Discrete Active Inference , volume=. Neural Computation , publisher=. doi:10.1162/neco_a_01574 , number=

    doi

  14. [22]

    Market sense-making in design practice: exploring curiosity, creativity and courage , volume=

    Windahl, Charlotta , year=. Market sense-making in design practice: exploring curiosity, creativity and courage , volume=. Journal of Marketing Management , publisher=. doi:10.1080/0267257x.2016.1272306 , number=

    2016

  15. [23]

    Capturing, clarifying, and consolidating the curiosity-creativity connection , volume=

    Koutstaal, Wilma and Kedrick, Kara and Gonzalez-Brito, Joshua , year=. Capturing, clarifying, and consolidating the curiosity-creativity connection , volume=. Scientific Reports , publisher=. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19694-4 , number=

    doi

  16. [24]

    Curiosity through courage: Introducing the iterative process to the beginning design student , ISBN=

    O’Connor, Kate , year=. Curiosity through courage: Introducing the iterative process to the beginning design student , ISBN=. doi:10.1201/9780429297786-36 , booktitle=

    doi

  17. [25]

    What Doesn’t Kill the Cat Makes it Creative: Complex Interplay Between Trait Curiosity and Creativity , volume=

    Ren, Zhiting and Chen, Qunlin and Li, Xianrui and Wei, Dongtao and Qiu, Jiang , year=. What Doesn’t Kill the Cat Makes it Creative: Complex Interplay Between Trait Curiosity and Creativity , volume=. Creativity Research Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2431785 , number=

  18. [26]

    Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity , volume=

    Gross, Madeleine E and Zedelius, Claire M and Schooler, Jonathan W , year=. Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.015 , journal=

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity , volume=

    Guaman-Quintanilla, Sharon and Everaert, Patricia and Chiluiza, Katherine and Valcke, Martin , year=. Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity , volume=. International Journal of Technology and Design Education ...

    doi

  20. [28]

    The driving mindsets of innovation: curiosity, creativity and clarity , volume=

    Walsh, Christian and Knott, Paul and Collins, Jamie , year=. The driving mindsets of innovation: curiosity, creativity and clarity , volume=. Journal of Business Strategy , publisher=. doi:10.1108/jbs-08-2020-0176 , number=

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    Innovation and Design in the Age of Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Verganti, Roberto and Vendraminelli, Luca and Iansiti, Marco , year=. Innovation and Design in the Age of Artificial Intelligence , volume=. Journal of Product Innovation Management , publisher=. doi:10.1111/jpim.12523 , number=

    doi

  22. [30]

    Design thinking in action: a quantitative study of design thinking practices in innovation projects , volume=

    Dell’Era, Claudio and Magistretti, Stefano and Candi, Marina and Bianchi, Mattia and Calabretta, Giulia and Stigliani, Ileana and Verganti, Roberto , year=. Design thinking in action: a quantitative study of design thinking practices in innovation projects , volume=. Journal o...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Curiosity and Interest: Emergence and Divergence , volume=

    Ainley, Mary , year=. Curiosity and Interest: Emergence and Divergence , volume=. Educational Psychology Review , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09495-z , number=

    doi

  24. [32]

    Silvia, Paul J. , year=. Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion , volume=. Review of General Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342 , number=

    doi

  25. [33]

    Lamnina, Marianna and Chase, Catherine C. , year=. Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity, affect, learning, and transfer , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101785 , journal=

    2019

  26. [34]

    and O’Doherty, John P

    Cockburn, Jeffrey and Man, Vincent and Cunningham, William A. and O’Doherty, John P. , year=. Novelty and uncertainty regulate the balance between exploration and exploitation through distinct mechanisms in the human brain , volume=. Neuron , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2...

    doi

  27. [35]

    and Mirnalinee, T

    Angel Deborah, S. and Mirnalinee, T. T. and Rajendram, S. Milton , year=. Emotion Analysis on Text Using Multiple Kernel Gaussian... , volume=. Neural Processing Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s11063-021-10436-7 , number=

    doi

  28. [36]

    Parameter selection in SVM with RBF kernel function , url=

    Han, Shunjie and Qubo, Cao and Meng, Han , year=. Parameter selection in SVM with RBF kernel function , url=. doi:10.1109/WAC.2012.6321759 , booktitle=

    2012

  29. [37]

    doi:10.5040/9781474280617.ch-006 , booktitle=

    doi

  30. [38]

    The generative dance of design inquiry: Exploring Dewey’s pragmatism for design research , volume=

    Stompff, Guido and van Bruinessen, Ties and Smulders, Frido , year=. The generative dance of design inquiry: Exploring Dewey’s pragmatism for design research , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2022.101136 , journal=

    2022

  31. [39]

    and Dan, Ohad , year=

    Seiler, Johannes P.-H. and Dan, Ohad , year=. Boredom and curiosity: the hunger and the appetite for information , volume=. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1514348 , journal=

    2024

  32. [40]

    The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design , ISBN=

    Koskela, Lauri and Paavola, Sami and Kroll, Ehud , year=. The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design , ISBN=. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8 , booktitle=

    doi

  33. [41]

    Abductive Inferences in Strategic Design Decisions , volume=

    Kroll, Ehud and Koskela, Lauri , year=. Abductive Inferences in Strategic Design Decisions , volume=. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , publisher=. doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.111 , number=

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    Research design process formalization , volume=

    Палагін, Олександр Васильович and Опанасенко, Володимир Миколайович , year=. Research design process formalization , volume=. Problems of Informatization and Management , publisher=. doi:10.18372/2073-4751.61.14042 , number=

    doi

  35. [43]

    Constrained multiple kernel tracking for human limbs , url=

    Ke, Shian-Ru and Hwang, Jenq-Neng and Fazel, Maryam and Wang, Shen-Zheng and Pai, Hung-I , year=. Constrained multiple kernel tracking for human limbs , url=. doi:10.1109/iscas.2012.6271628 , booktitle=

    2012

  36. [44]

    Kidd, Celeste and Hayden, Benjamin Y. , year=. The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity , volume=. Neuron , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010 , number=

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    Process Account of Curiosity and Interest: A Reward-Learning Perspective , volume=

    Murayama, Kou and FitzGibbon, Lily and Sakaki, Michiko , year=. Process Account of Curiosity and Interest: A Reward-Learning Perspective , volume=. Educational Psychology Review , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09499-9 , number=

    doi

  38. [46]

    The curious U: Integrating theories linking knowledge and information-seeking behavior , url=

    Ten, Alexandr and Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves and Sakaki, Michiko and Murayama, Kou , year=. The curious U: Integrating theories linking knowledge and information-seeking behavior , url=. doi:10.31234/osf.io/s8mkj , journal=

    doi

  39. [47]

    Why so curious? Quantifying mechanisms of information seeking , volume=

    van Lieshout, Lieke LF and de Lange, Floris P and Cools, Roshan , year=. Why so curious? Quantifying mechanisms of information seeking , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.005 , journal=

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    Homo Curious: Curious or Interested? , volume=

    Shin, Dajung Diane and Kim, Sung-il , year=. Homo Curious: Curious or Interested? , volume=. Educational Psychology Review , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09497-x , number=

    doi

  41. [49]

    and Vandenbroucke, Annelinde R.E

    van Lieshout, Lieke L.F. and Vandenbroucke, Annelinde R.E. and Müller, Nils C.J. and Cools, Roshan and de Lange, Floris P. , year=. Induction and Relief of Curiosity Elicit Parietal and Frontal Activity , volume=. The Journal of Neuroscience , publisher=. doi:10.1523/jneurosci...

    doi

  42. [50]

    The neuroeconomics of epistemic curiosity , volume=

    Buyalskaya, Anastasia and Camerer, Colin F , year=. The neuroeconomics of epistemic curiosity , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.09.006 , journal=

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    and Cleary, Anne M

    McNeely-White, Katherine L. and Cleary, Anne M. , year=. Piquing Curiosity: Déjà vu-Like States Are Associated with Feelings of Curiosity and Information-Seeking Behaviors , volume=. Journal of Intelligence , publisher=. doi:10.3390/jintelligence11060112 , number=

    doi

  44. [52]

    From relief to surprise: Dual control of epistemic curiosity in the human brain , volume=

    Ligneul, Romain and Mermillod, Martial and Morisseau, Tiffany , year=. From relief to surprise: Dual control of epistemic curiosity in the human brain , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.038 , journal=

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Curiosity-driven exploration: foundations in neuroscience and computational modeling , volume=

    Modirshanechi, Alireza and Kondrakiewicz, Kacper and Gerstner, Wulfram and Haesler, Sebastian , year=. Curiosity-driven exploration: foundations in neuroscience and computational modeling , volume=. Trends in Neurosciences , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2023.10.002 , number=

    doi

  46. [54]

    Questions, Curiosity and the Inquiry Cycle , volume=

    Casey, Leo , year=. Questions, Curiosity and the Inquiry Cycle , volume=. E-Learning and Digital Media , publisher=. doi:10.2304/elea.2014.11.5.510 , number=

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    Curiosity and open inquiry learning , volume=

    Zion, M.ichal and Sadeh, Irit , year=. Curiosity and open inquiry learning , volume=. Journal of Biological Education , publisher=. doi:10.1080/00219266.2007.9656092 , number=

    2007

  48. [56]

    1960 , month=

    Nature , publisher=. 1960 , month=. doi:10.1038/186763c0 , number=

    1960 doi

  49. [57]

    Practice-Based Research Methods and Tools: Introducing the Design Diagnostic , volume=

    Nanda, Upali and Wingler, Deborah , year=. Practice-Based Research Methods and Tools: Introducing the Design Diagnostic , volume=. HERD: Health Environments Research and Design Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1177/1937586720945176 , number=

    doi

  50. [58]

    Making Sense of Field Research: A Practical Guide for Information Designers , ISBN=

    Pontis, Sheila , year=. Making Sense of Field Research: A Practical Guide for Information Designers , ISBN=. doi:10.4324/9781315213613 , publisher=

    doi

  51. [59]

    Design as a Mode of Inquiry in Design Pedagogy and Design Thinking , volume=

    Ejsing‐Duun, Stine and Skovbjerg, Helle Marie , year=. Design as a Mode of Inquiry in Design Pedagogy and Design Thinking , volume=. International Journal of Art and Design Education , publisher=. doi:10.1111/jade.12214 , number=

    doi

  52. [60]

    Surprised–curious–confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration

    Vogl, Elisabeth and Pekrun, Reinhard and Murayama, Kou and Loderer, Kristina , year=. Surprised–curious–confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration. , volume=. Emotion , publisher=. doi:10.1037/emo0000578 , number=

    doi

  53. [61]

    and Suma, I Ketut and Subagia, I Wayan , year=

    Hunaepi, H. and Suma, I Ketut and Subagia, I Wayan , year=. Curiosity in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review , volume=. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education , publisher=. doi:10.36312/ijece.v3i1.1918 , number=

    doi

  54. [62]

    and Aslin, Richard N

    Kidd, Celeste and Piantadosi, Steven T. and Aslin, Richard N. , editor=. The Goldilocks Effect: Human Infants Allocate Attention to Visual Sequences That Are Neither Too Simple Nor Too Complex , volume=. PLoS ONE , publisher=. 2012 , month=. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036399 , number=

    2012 doi

  55. [63]

    Method in their madness: Explaining how designers think and act through the cognitive co-evolution model , volume=

    Cash, Philip and Gonçalves, Milene and Dorst, Kees , year=. Method in their madness: Explaining how designers think and act through the cognitive co-evolution model , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2023.101219 , journal=

    2023

  56. [64]

    Exploring uncertainty perception as a driver of design activity , volume=

    Cash, Philip and Kreye, Melanie , year=. Exploring uncertainty perception as a driver of design activity , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.004 , journal=

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    and Hutchinson, Alisa , year=

    Tracey, Monica W. and Hutchinson, Alisa , year=. Uncertainty, reflection, and designer identity development , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.10.004 , journal=

    2015 doi

  58. [66]

    Computational Theories of Curiosity-Driven Learning , journal=

    Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves , year=. Computational Theories of Curiosity-Driven Learning , journal=. doi:10.31234/osf.io/3p8f6 , publisher=

    doi

  59. [67]

    Modeling and Designing for Key Elements of Curiosity: Risking Failure, Valuing Questions , ISSN=

    To, Alexandra and Holmes, Jarrek and Fath, Elaine and Zhang, Eda and Kaufmann, Geoff and Hammer, Jessica , year=. Modeling and Designing for Key Elements of Curiosity: Risking Failure, Valuing Questions , ISSN=. doi:10.26503/dl.v2017i1.923 , booktitle=

    doi

  60. [68]

    Thanks, but no-thanks for the feedback , volume=

    Forsythe, Alex and Johnson, Sophie , year=. Thanks, but no-thanks for the feedback , volume=. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , publisher=. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1202190 , number=

    2016

  61. [69]

    Unspecified title , volume=

    , Muhammad Omar, Farhana Diana Deris, Geena Sandra Codfrey, Aslina Baharum, Nurul Hidayah Mat Zain , year=. Unspecified title , volume=. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications , publisher=. doi:10.17762/msea.v71i2.83 , number=

    doi

  62. [70]

    and Beckerle, Philipp and Moreno, Juan C

    Ármannsdóttir, Anna L. and Beckerle, Philipp and Moreno, Juan C. and van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F. and Manrique-Sancho, Maria-Teresa and del-Ama, Antonio J. and Veneman, Jan F. and Briem, Kristín , year=. Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearabl...

    doi

  63. [71]

    The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design , volume=

    Fischer, Björn and Peine, Alexander and Östlund, Britt , editor=. The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design , volume=. The Gerontologist , publisher=. 2019 , month=. doi:10.1093/geront/gnz163 , number=

    2019 doi

  64. [72]

    and Rotgans, Jerome I

    Schmidt, Henk G. and Rotgans, Jerome I. , year=. Epistemic Curiosity and Situational Interest: Distant Cousins or Identical Twins? , volume=. Educational Psychology Review , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09539-9 , number=

    doi

  65. [73]

    Ann and Hidi, Suzanne E

    Tang, Xin and Renninger, K. Ann and Hidi, Suzanne E. and Murayama, Kou and Lavonen, Jari and Salmela-Aro, Katariina , year=. The differences and similarities between curiosity and interest: Meta-analysis and network analyses , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101628 , journal=

  66. [74]

    Aslan, Sumeyye and Fastrich, Greta and Donnellan, Ed and Jones, Daniel J. W. and Murayama, Kou , editor=. People’s naïve belief about curiosity and interest: A qualitative study , volume=. PLOS ONE , publisher=. 2021 , month=. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256632 , number=

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    Ancona, Deborah Gladstein and Caldwell, David F. , year=. Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , volume=. Organization Science , publisher=. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.321 , number=

    doi

  68. [76]

    The effects of expertise diversity on efficiency and creativity in healthcare project teams , volume=

    Yoo, Sangok and Kang, Ji Yun , year=. The effects of expertise diversity on efficiency and creativity in healthcare project teams , volume=. European Journal of Training and Development , publisher=. doi:10.1108/ejtd-06-2023-0092 , number=

    2023 doi

  69. [77]

    and Briggs, Robert O

    Reinig, Bruce A. and Briggs, Robert O. , year=. On The Relationship Between Idea-Quantity and Idea-Quality During Ideation , volume=. Group Decision and Negotiation , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9105-2 , number=

    doi

  70. [78]

    It is not always better to have more ideas: Serial order and the trade-off between fluency and elaboration in divergent thinking tasks

    Gonthier, Corentin and Besançon, Maud , year=. It is not always better to have more ideas: Serial order and the trade-off between fluency and elaboration in divergent thinking tasks. , volume=. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts , publisher=. doi:10.1037/aca000...

    doi

  71. [79]

    How do you frame ill‐defined problems? A study on creative logics in action , volume=

    Pham, Cristina Tu Anh and Magistretti, Stefano and Dell’Era, Claudio , year=. How do you frame ill‐defined problems? A study on creative logics in action , volume=. Creativity and Innovation Management , publisher=. doi:10.1111/caim.12543 , number=

    doi

  72. [80]

    and Heidari, S

    Namari, S.M. and Heidari, S. and Ebrahimi, H. , year=. Analyzing the Role of Problem Finding in the Creative Design with Regard to the Effect of Prior Knowledge in the Design Process , ISSN=. Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture , publisher=. doi:10.36622/...

  73. [81]

    Reframing the Design Process: Integrating Goals, Methods and Manifestation into the Co-Evolution Model , volume=

    Storm, Rosa and van Maanen, Jeffrey and Gonçalves, Milene , year=. Reframing the Design Process: Integrating Goals, Methods and Manifestation into the Co-Evolution Model , volume=. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , publisher=. ...

    doi

  74. [82]

    de Bruin, Anique B. H. and Biwer, Felicitas and Hui, Luotong and Onan, Erdem and David, Louise and Wiradhany, Wisnu , year=. Worth the Effort: the Start and Stick to Desirable Difficulties (S2D2) Framework , volume=. Educational Psychology Review , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s106...

    doi

  75. [83]

    and Kennedy, Gregor and Lockyer, Lori and Arguel, Amael and Pachman, Mariya , year=

    Lodge, Jason M. and Kennedy, Gregor and Lockyer, Lori and Arguel, Amael and Pachman, Mariya , year=. Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review , volume=. doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00049 , journal=

    2018

  76. [84]

    and Stinglhamber, Florence and Shanock, Linda and Randall, Amanda T

    Eisenberger, Robert and Jones, Jason R. and Stinglhamber, Florence and Shanock, Linda and Randall, Amanda T. , year=. Flow experiences at work: for high need achievers alone? , volume=. Journal of Organizational Behavior , publisher=. doi:10.1002/job.337 , number=

    doi

  77. [85]

    Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty , url=

    Wu, Charley M and Schulz, Eric and Pleskac, Timothy Joseph and Speekenbrink, Maarten , year=. Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty , url=. doi:10.31234/osf.io/dsw7q , journal=

    doi

  78. [86]

    Learning and Motivation When Using Multiple-Try in a Digital Game for Primary Students in Chile , volume=

    Cubillos, Claudio and Roncagliolo, Silvana and Cabrera-Paniagua, Daniel , year=. Learning and Motivation When Using Multiple-Try in a Digital Game for Primary Students in Chile , volume=. Education Sciences , publisher=. doi:10.3390/educsci13111119 , number=

    doi

  79. [87]

    A Human-Centered Design Methodology to Enhance the Usability, Human Factors, and User Experience of Connected Health Systems: A Three-Phase Methodology , volume=

    Harte, Richard and Glynn, Liam and Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro and Baker, Paul MA and Scharf, Thomas and Quinlan, Leo R and ÓLaighin, Gearóid , year=. A Human-Centered Design Methodology to Enhance the Usability, Human Factors, and User Experience of Connected Health Systems...

    doi

  80. [88]

    What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? , volume=

    Razzouk, Rim and Shute, Valerie , year=. What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? , volume=. Review of Educational Research , publisher=. doi:10.3102/0034654312457429 , number=

    doi

  81. [89]

    and Bikkani, Abhishek and Poterucha Carter, M

    Cook, David A. and Bikkani, Abhishek and Poterucha Carter, M. Jeannie , year=. Evaluating education innovations rapidly with build-measure-learn: Applying lean startup to health professions education , volume=. Medical Teacher , publisher=. doi:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2118038 , number=

  82. [90]

    Amabile, Teresa M. , year=. Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , volume=. California Management Review , publisher=. doi:10.2307/41165921 , number=

    doi

  83. [91]

    and Schafmann, Ernestine , year=

    Fischer, Carmen and Malycha, Charlotte P. and Schafmann, Ernestine , year=. The Influence of Intrinsic Motivation and Synergistic Extrinsic Motivators on Creativity and Innovation , volume=. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137 , journal=

    2019

  84. [92]

    Achieving job performance through agility and innovativeness by strategizing learning ambidexterity , volume=

    Lin, Chieh-Peng and Hu, Shan-Wen and Chiu, Chou-Kang , year=. Achieving job performance through agility and innovativeness by strategizing learning ambidexterity , volume=. Journal of Managerial Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1108/jmp-12-2023-0752 , number=

    doi

  85. [93]

    Technology-Assisted Language Learning Systems: A Systematic Literature Review , volume=

    Buddha, Hareesh and Shuib, Liyana and Idris, Norisma and Eke, Christopher Ifeanyi , year=. Technology-Assisted Language Learning Systems: A Systematic Literature Review , volume=. doi:10.1109/access.2024.3366663 , journal=

    2024

  86. [94]

    2023 , month=

    Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction , publisher=. 2023 , month=. doi:10.47750/pegegog.13.02.22 , number=

    2023 doi

  87. [95]

    Micro World – Exploring the Microbial Kingdom

    Chen, Yanying and Tan, Yaoxin and Wang, Yuhui , year=. “Micro World – Exploring the Microbial Kingdom”: design and testing of a microbial VR science product , volume=. Interactive Learning Environments , publisher=. doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2211640 , number=

  88. [96]

    The multifaceted role of self-generated question asking in curiosity-driven learning , url=

    Kedrick, Kara and Schrater, Paul and Koutstaal, Wilma , year=. The multifaceted role of self-generated question asking in curiosity-driven learning , url=. doi:10.31234/osf.io/aj2pb , publisher=

    doi

  89. [97]

    CREATIVE PROBLEM-FINDING: A SHIFT IN FOCUS FOR CREATIVE TOOLS , url=

    De Vos, Ellen and Baccarne, Bas and Emmanouil, Marina , year=. CREATIVE PROBLEM-FINDING: A SHIFT IN FOCUS FOR CREATIVE TOOLS , url=. doi:10.35199/epde.2021.72 , booktitle=

    2021 doi

  90. [98]

    and Schulz, Eric and Garvert, Mona M

    Wu, Charley M. and Schulz, Eric and Garvert, Mona M. and Meder, Björn and Schuck, Nicolas W. , editor=. Similarities and differences in spatial and non-spatial cognitive maps , volume=. PLOS Computational Biology , publisher=. 2020 , month=. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008149 , number=

    2020 doi

  91. [99]

    and Huys, Quentin J

    Schulz, Eric and Wu, Charley M. and Huys, Quentin J. M. and Krause, Andreas and Speekenbrink, Maarten , year=. Generalization and Search in Risky Environments , volume=. Cognitive Science , publisher=. doi:10.1111/cogs.12695 , number=

    doi

  92. [100]

    and Whyte, Christopher J

    Smith, Ryan and Friston, Karl J. and Whyte, Christopher J. , year=. A step-by-step tutorial on active inference and its application to empirical data , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102632 , journal=

    2021

  93. [101]

    and Christensen, Bo T

    Ball, Linden J. and Christensen, Bo T. , year=. Advancing an understanding of design cognition and design metacognition: Progress and prospects , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.003 , journal=

    2019 doi

  94. [102]

    Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model: A foundation for unifying perspectives on design activity , volume=

    Cash, Philip and Kreye, Melanie , year=. Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model: A foundation for unifying perspectives on design activity , volume=. doi:10.1017/dsj.2017.28 , journal=

    2017 doi

  95. [103]

    Uncertainty and disciplinary difference: Mapping attitudes towards uncertainty across discipline boundaries , volume=

    Dyer, Loren and Power, Jacqueline and Steen, Andrew and Wallis, Louise and Davison, Aidan , year=. Uncertainty and disciplinary difference: Mapping attitudes towards uncertainty across discipline boundaries , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2021.101055 , journal=

  96. [104]

    Sequential Testing of Product Designs: Implications for Learning , volume=

    Erat, Sanjiv and Kavadias, Stylianos , year=. Sequential Testing of Product Designs: Implications for Learning , volume=. Management Science , publisher=. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0784 , number=

  97. [105]

    and Suresh Kumar, Roshan and Selva, Daniel , year=

    Chaudhari, Ashish M. and Suresh Kumar, Roshan and Selva, Daniel , year=. Supporting Designer Learning and Performance in Design Space Exploration: A Goal-Setting Approach , url=. doi:10.1115/detc2021-71257 , booktitle=

    doi

  98. [106]

    and Erhan, Halil , year=

    Abuzuraiq, Ahmed M. and Erhan, Halil , year=. Designing with sense: A critical review and proposal for enhanced design space exploration in generative design , volume=. International Journal of Architectural Computing , publisher=. doi:10.1177/14780771241260854 , number=

    doi

  99. [107]

    Special Issue Editorial –Accumulation and Evolution of Design Knowledge in Design Science Research: A Journey Through Time and Space , volume=

    and vom Brocke, Jan and Winter, Robert and Hevner, Alan and Maedche, Alexander and , year=. Special Issue Editorial –Accumulation and Evolution of Design Knowledge in Design Science Research: A Journey Through Time and Space , volume=. Journal of the Association for Informatio...

    doi

  100. [108]

    and Maher, M.L

    Poon, J. and Maher, M.L. , year=. Co-evolution and emergence in design , volume=. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering , publisher=. doi:10.1016/s0954-1810(96)00047-7 , number=

    doi

  101. [109]

    and Milovanovic, Julie , year=

    Gero, John S. and Milovanovic, Julie , year=. A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains , volume=. doi:10.1017/dsj.2020.15 , journal=

    2020 doi

  102. [110]

    Prototyping with Uncertainties: Data, Algorithms, and Research through Design , volume=

    Giaccardi, Elisa and Murray-Rust, Dave and Redström, Johan and Caramiaux, Baptiste , year=. Prototyping with Uncertainties: Data, Algorithms, and Research through Design , volume=. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction , publisher=. doi:10.1145/3702322 , number=

    doi

  103. [111]

    Uncertainties as Generative Resources in Research through Design: Three Dynamics for Moving in a Design Space , volume=

    Epp, Felix Anand and Rosén, Anton Poikolainen and Salovaara, Antti and Sanchez, Camilo , year=. Uncertainties as Generative Resources in Research through Design: Three Dynamics for Moving in a Design Space , volume=. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction , publisher=....

    doi

  104. [112]

    and Christensen, Bo T

    Ball, Linden J. and Christensen, Bo T. , year=. Analogical Reasoning and Mental Simulation in Design: Two Strategies Linked to Uncertainty Resolution* , ISBN=. doi:10.1201/9780429182433-11 , booktitle=

    doi

  105. [113]

    The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances , volume=

    Xenakis, Ioannis and Arnellos, Argyris , year=. The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.004 , number=

    2012 doi

  106. [114]

    The psychological experience of prototyping , volume=

    Gerber, Elizabeth and Carroll, Maureen , year=. The psychological experience of prototyping , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.005 , number=

    2011 doi

  107. [115]

    and Ball, Linden J

    Wiltschnig, Stefan and Christensen, Bo T. and Ball, Linden J. , year=. Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002 , number=

    2013 doi

  108. [116]

    (Re)positioning uncertainty in design processes: How to address the complex challenges we face

    Barco Fernandez, Angelica , year=. (Re)positioning uncertainty in design processes: How to address the complex challenges we face. , url=. doi:10.5151/ead2023-1bil-01full-05barco , booktitle=

    doi

  109. [117]

    and Maxfield, Robert R

    Lane, David A. and Maxfield, Robert R. , year=. Ontological uncertainty and innovation , volume=. Journal of Evolutionary Economics , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0227-7 , number=

    doi

  110. [118]

    Christensen, Bo Thomas and Ball, Linden J. , year=. Fluctuating epistemic uncertainty in a design team as a metacognitive driver for creative cognitive processes , volume=. CoDesign , publisher=. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1402060 , number=

    2017

  111. [119]

    and Onarheim, Balder and Christensen, Bo T

    Ball, Linden J. and Onarheim, Balder and Christensen, Bo T. , year=. Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.003 , number=

    doi

  112. [120]

    and Wiecek, Margaret M

    Reneke, James A. and Wiecek, Margaret M. and Fadel, Georges M. and Samson, Sundeep and Nowak, Dimitri , year=. Design Under Uncertainty: Balancing Expected Performance and Risk , volume=. Journal of Mechanical Design , publisher=. doi:10.1115/1.4002836 , number=

    doi

  113. [121]

    and Mourelatos, Zissimos P

    Dai, Zhihuang and Scott, Michael J. and Mourelatos, Zissimos P. , year=. Incorporating Epistemic Uncertainty in Robust Design , url=. doi:10.1115/detc2003/dac-48713 , booktitle=

    doi

  114. [122]

    and Barry, Michael , year=

    Beckman, Sara L. and Barry, Michael , year=. Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking , volume=. California Management Review , publisher=. doi:10.2307/41166415 , number=

    doi

  115. [123]

    Fong, Patrick S.W. , year=. Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: an empirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships , volume=. International Journal of Project Management , publisher=. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(03)00047-4 , number=

    doi

  116. [124]

    Design research: building the knowledge base , volume=

    Owen, Charles L , year=. Design research: building the knowledge base , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(97)00030-6 , number=

    doi

  117. [125]

    The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication , volume=

    Dong, Andy , year=. The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.10.003 , number=

    2004 doi

  118. [126]

    and Khriss, I

    Elkoutbi, M. and Khriss, I. and Keller, R.K. , year=. Generating user interface prototypes from scenarios , url=. doi:10.1109/isre.1999.777995 , booktitle=

    1999

  119. [127]

    Jonassen, David H. , year=. Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , volume=. Educational Technology Research and Development , publisher=. doi:10.1007/bf02299613 , number=

    doi

  120. [128]

    Assessment of structuredness of problems in design , volume=

    Singh, Sanjay and Chakrabarti, Amaresh , year=. Assessment of structuredness of problems in design , volume=. doi:10.1017/pds.2024.111 , journal=

    2024 doi

  121. [129]

    Rosso, Brent D. , year=. Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams , volume=. Organization Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1177/0170840613517600 , number=

    doi

  122. [130]

    A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping , volume=

    Camburn, Bradley and Dunlap, Brock and Gurjar, Tanmay and Hamon, Christopher and Green, Matthew and Jensen, Daniel and Crawford, Richard and Otto, Kevin and Wood, Kristin , year=. A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping , volume=. Journal of Mechanical Design , publisher=. ...

    doi

  123. [131]

    From Idea to Production: A Retrospective and Longitudinal Case Study of Prototypes and Prototyping Strategies , volume=

    Hansen, Camilla Arndt and Özkil, Ali Gürcan , year=. From Idea to Production: A Retrospective and Longitudinal Case Study of Prototypes and Prototyping Strategies , volume=. Journal of Mechanical Design , publisher=. doi:10.1115/1.4045385 , number=

    doi

  124. [132]

    User research and design creativity: three insights for future studies , volume=

    Frich, Jonas and Mose Biskjaer, Michael and Remy, Christian and MacDonald Vermulen, Lindsay and Dalsgaard, Peter , year=. User research and design creativity: three insights for future studies , volume=. Behaviour and Information Technology , publisher=. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2...

  125. [133]

    Network oscillations imply the highest cognitive workload and lowest cognitive control during idea generation in open-ended creation tasks , volume=

    Jia, Wenjun and von Wegner, Frederic and Zhao, Mengting and Zeng, Yong , year=. Network oscillations imply the highest cognitive workload and lowest cognitive control during idea generation in open-ended creation tasks , volume=. Scientific Reports , publisher=. doi:10.1038/s4...

    doi

  126. [134]

    and Tran, Khue and Koutstaal, Wilma , editor=

    Erwin, Abbey K. and Tran, Khue and Koutstaal, Wilma , editor=. Evaluating the predictive validity of four divergent thinking tasks for the originality of design product ideation , volume=. PLOS ONE , publisher=. 2022 , month=. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265116 , number=

    2022 doi

  127. [135]

    The effect of educational game design process on students’ creativity , volume=

    Bulut, Derman and Samur, Yavuz and Cömert, Zeynep , year=. The effect of educational game design process on students’ creativity , volume=. Smart Learning Environments , publisher=. doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00188-9 , number=

    doi

  128. [136]

    Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer , volume=

    Spence, Charles and Gallace, Alberto , year=. Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer , volume=. Psychology and Marketing , publisher=. doi:10.1002/mar.20392 , number=

    doi

  129. [137]

    Multimodal Kansei design methodology with expectation effect , volume=

    Miyazaki, Chihiro and Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi , year=. Multimodal Kansei design methodology with expectation effect , volume=. The Proceedings of Design and Systems Conference , publisher=. doi:10.1299/jsmedsd.2016.26.2501 , number=

    2016 doi

  130. [138]

    A Methodology for Multisensory Product Experience Design Using Cross-modal Effect: A Case of SLR Camera , volume=

    Maki, Takuma and Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi , year=. A Methodology for Multisensory Product Experience Design Using Cross-modal Effect: A Case of SLR Camera , volume=. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , publisher=. doi:10.1017/dsi.20...

    doi

  131. [139]

    Tajdini, Saeed and Ramirez, Edward and Frankwick, Gary L. , year=. Developing a multi‐dimensional product evaluation scale , volume=. Psychology and Marketing , publisher=. doi:10.1002/mar.21594 , number=

    doi

  132. [140]

    and Zeithaml, V

    Brucks, M. and Zeithaml, V. A. and Naylor, G. , year=. Price and Brand Name As Indicators of Quality Dimensions for Consumer Durables , volume=. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , publisher=. doi:10.1177/0092070300283005 , number=

    doi

  133. [141]

    and Ball, Linden J

    Christensen, Bo T. and Ball, Linden J. , year=. Dimensions of creative evaluation: Distinct design and reasoning strategies for aesthetic, functional and originality judgments , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.005 , journal=

    2015 doi

  134. [142]

    Mano, Haim and Oliver, Richard L. , year=. Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction , volume=. Journal of Consumer Research , publisher=. doi:10.1086/209361 , number=

    doi

  135. [143]

    Context-Dependent Product Evaluations: An Empirical Analysis of Internet Book Reviews , ISSN=

    Hu, Ye and Li, Xinxin , year=. Context-Dependent Product Evaluations: An Empirical Analysis of Internet Book Reviews , ISSN=. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1694146 , journal=

    doi

  136. [144]

    Association change and its relationship with designs in context and form: how product evaluation is affected by negative framings , volume=

    Berni, Aurora and Borgianni, Yuri and Carbon, Claus-Christian , year=. Association change and its relationship with designs in context and form: how product evaluation is affected by negative framings , volume=. Journal of Engineering Design , publisher=. doi:10.1080/09544828....

  137. [145]

    Consumer perceptions of third party product quality ratings , volume=

    De Maeyer, Peter and Estelami, Hooman , year=. Consumer perceptions of third party product quality ratings , volume=. Journal of Business Research , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.001 , number=

    2011 doi

  138. [146]

    and Siddharth, L

    Ranjan, B.S.C. and Siddharth, L. and Chakrabarti, Amaresh , year=. A systematic approach to assessing novelty, requirement satisfaction, and creativity , volume=. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , publisher=. doi:10.1017/s089006041800...

    doi

  139. [147]

    Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler , volume=

    Umeda, Yasushi and Ishii, Masaki and Yoshioka, Masaharu and Shimomura, Yoshiki and Tomiyama, Tetsuo , year=. Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler , volume=. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , publis...

    doi

  140. [148]

    and Kannengiesser, Udo , year=

    Gero, John S. and Kannengiesser, Udo , year=. The Situated Function — Behaviour — Structure Framework , ISBN=. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_5 , booktitle=

    doi

  141. [149]

    The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edition: By Herbert A

    Bar-Yam, Yaneer , year=. The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edition: By Herbert A. Simon , volume=. Complexity , publisher=. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0526(199805/06)3:5<47::aid-cplx7>3.0.co;2-f , number=

    doi

  142. [150]

    Foster, Mary K. , year=. Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Problem Solving , volume=. Management Teaching Review , publisher=. doi:10.1177/2379298119871468 , number=

    doi

  143. [151]

    Simon, Herbert A. , year=. The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial , volume=. Design Issues , publisher=. doi:10.2307/1511391 , number=

    doi

  144. [152]

    Launching Under Pressure: How Resource Scarcity Affects Design Decisions and Resource Management , volume=

    Letting, Cynthia and Menold, Jessica , year=. Launching Under Pressure: How Resource Scarcity Affects Design Decisions and Resource Management , volume=. Journal of Mechanical Design , publisher=. doi:10.1115/1.4070399 , number=

    doi

  145. [153]

    and Bilionis, Ilias and Panchal, Jitesh H

    Chaudhari, Ashish M. and Bilionis, Ilias and Panchal, Jitesh H. , year=. Descriptive Models of Sequential Decisions in Engineering Design: An Experimental Study , volume=. Journal of Mechanical Design , publisher=. doi:10.1115/1.4045605 , number=

    doi

  146. [154]

    Optimal resource allocation for dynamic product development process via convex optimization , volume=

    Zhao, Chengyan and Ogura, Masaki and Kishida, Masako and Yassine, Ali , year=. Optimal resource allocation for dynamic product development process via convex optimization , volume=. Research in Engineering Design , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s00163-020-00346-5 , number=

    doi

  147. [155]

    The interaction of time and cost constraints on the design process , volume=

    Savage, Justin C.D and Moore, Carolynne J and Miles, John C and Miles, Christopher , year=. The interaction of time and cost constraints on the design process , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00004-0 , number=

    doi

  148. [156]

    2013 , month=

    Kant, Immanuel , title =. 2013 , month=. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511804649 , isbn =

    2013 doi

  149. [157]

    1962 , publisher =

    von Helmholtz, Hermann , title =. 1962 , publisher =

    1962

  150. [158]

    and Pouget, Alexandre , year=

    Knill, David C. and Pouget, Alexandre , year=. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , volume=. Trends in Neurosciences , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007 , number=

    2004 doi

  151. [159]

    Rao, Rajesh P. N. and Ballard, Dana H. , year=. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects , volume=. Nature Neuroscience , publisher=. doi:10.1038/4580 , number=

    doi

  152. [160]

    The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , volume=

    Friston, Karl , year=. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , volume=. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , publisher=. doi:10.1038/nrn2787 , number=

    doi

  153. [161]

    Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering , volume=

    Hatchuel, Armand and Le Masson, Pascal and Reich, Yoram and Subrahmanian, Eswaran , year=. Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering , volume=. Research in Engineering Design , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s00163-017-0275-2 , number=

    doi

  154. [162]

    Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts , volume=

    Kroes, Peter , year=. Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00039-4 , number=

    doi

  155. [163]

    and Ball, Linden J

    Tseng, Winger S.W. and Ball, Linden J. , year=. How Uncertainty Helps Sketch Interpretation in a Design Task , ISBN=. doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-224-7_33 , booktitle=

    doi

  156. [164]

    C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , volume=

    Hatchuel, Armand and Weil, Benoit , year=. C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , volume=. Research in Engineering Design , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4 , number=

    doi

  157. [165]

    Introduction to General Design Theory , volume=

    YOSHIKAWA, Hiroyuki , year=. Introduction to General Design Theory , volume=. Journal of the Japan Society of Precision Engineering , publisher=. doi:10.2493/jjspe1933.45.906 , number=

    doi

  158. [166]

    and Shukla, Prakash Chandra , year=

    Parsons, Paul C. and Shukla, Prakash Chandra , year=. Beyond Problem Solving: Framing and Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in Data Visualization Design , volume=. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , publisher=. doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3633866 , number=

  159. [167]

    Analyzing problem framing in design teams: a systems mapping approach , volume=

    Litster, Gregory and Cardoso, Carlos and Hurst, Ada , year=. Analyzing problem framing in design teams: a systems mapping approach , volume=. doi:10.1017/s089006042400012x , journal=

    doi

  160. [168]

    Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , volume=

    Dorst, Kees and Cross, Nigel , year=. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , volume=. Design Studies , publisher=. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00009-6 , number=

    doi

  161. [169]

    1985 , month=

    Towards Creativity: Problem Finding in a Divergent-Thinking Exercise , author =. 1985 , month=

    1985

  162. [170]

    The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? , volume=

    Friston, Karl , year=. The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? , volume=. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005 , number=

    2009 doi

  163. [171]

    March, James G. , year=. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , volume=. Organization Science , publisher=. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 , number=

    doi

  164. [172]

    and Stigliani, Ileana , year=

    Elsbach, Kimberly D. and Stigliani, Ileana , year=. Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research , volume=. Journal of Management , publisher=. doi:10.1177/0149206317744252 , number=

    doi

  165. [173]

    Tabeau, Kasia and Gemser, Gerda and Hultink, Erik Jan and Wijnberg, Nachoem M. , year=. Exploration and exploitation activities for design innovation , volume=. Journal of Marketing Management , publisher=. doi:10.1080/0267257x.2016.1195855 , number=

  166. [174]

    and Daly, Shanna R

    Studer, Jaryn A. and Daly, Shanna R. and McKilligan, Seda and Seifert, Colleen M. , year=. Evidence of problem exploration in creative designs , volume=. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , publisher=. doi:10.1017/s0890060418000124 , number=

    doi

  167. [175]

    Virtual Reality and Creativity in visual Art Education: The Mediating Role of Exploration Within a Project-Based Learning Framework , volume=

    He, Lidan and Bin Md Salleh, Shaharuddin , year=. Virtual Reality and Creativity in visual Art Education: The Mediating Role of Exploration Within a Project-Based Learning Framework , volume=. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange , publisher=. doi:10.1878...

    doi

  168. [176]

    Exploring Creativity Support for Concept Art Ideation , url=

    Williford, Blake and Ray, Samantha and Koh, Jung In and Cherian, Josh and Taele, Paul and Hammond, Tracy , year=. Exploring Creativity Support for Concept Art Ideation , url=. doi:10.1145/3544549.3585684 , booktitle=

  169. [177]

    Making design decisions under uncertainties: probabilistic reasoning and robust product design , volume=

    Gembarski, Paul Christoph and Plappert, Stefan and Lachmayer, Roland , year=. Making design decisions under uncertainties: probabilistic reasoning and robust product design , volume=. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s10844-021-00665-6 , number=

    doi

  170. [178]

    and Wimbush, A

    Gray, A. and Wimbush, A. and de Angelis, M. and Hristov, P.O. and Calleja, D. and Miralles-Dolz, E. and Rocchetta, R. , year=. From inference to design: A comprehensive framework for uncertainty quantification in engineering with limited information , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.ym...

  171. [179]

    Design Experiments in Educational Research , volume=

    Cobb, Paul and Confrey, Jere and diSessa, Andrea and Lehrer, Richard and Schauble, Leona , year=. Design Experiments in Educational Research , volume=. Educational Researcher , publisher=. doi:10.3102/0013189x032001009 , number=

    doi

  172. [180]

    Technology-Enhanced Learning Analytics System Design for Engineering Education , volume=

    Abhyankar, Kushal and Ganapathy, Subhashini , year=. Technology-Enhanced Learning Analytics System Design for Engineering Education , volume=. International Journal of Information and Education Technology , publisher=. doi:10.7763/ijiet.2014.v4.427 , number=

    doi

  173. [181]

    Heath, Anna and Baio, Gianluca and Manolopoulou, Ioanna and Welton, Nicky J. , year=. Value of Information for Clinical Trial Design: The Importance of Considering All Relevant Comparators , volume=. PharmacoEconomics , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s40273-024-01372-0 , number=

    doi

  174. [182]

    van Riesen, Siswa A. N. and Gijlers, Hannie and Anjewierden, Anjo A. and de Jong, Ton , year=. The influence of prior knowledge on the effectiveness of guided experiment design , volume=. Interactive Learning Environments , publisher=. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1631193 , number=

  175. [183]

    Management Science , volume =

    Experimentation and Start-up Performance: Evidence from A/B Testing , author =. Management Science , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  176. [184]

    Decision Sciences , volume =

    Speed is Significant in Short-Loop Experimental Learning: Iterating and Debugging in High-Tech Product Innovation , author =. Decision Sciences , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  177. [185]

    Design Exploration

    Navinchandra, D. Design Exploration. Exploration and Innovation in Design: Towards a Computational Model. 1991. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3114-1_5

    1991 doi

  178. [186]

    1993 , edition =

    Logan, Brian and Smithers, Tim , title =. 1993 , edition =

    1993

  179. [187]

    , title =

    Berlyne, Daniel E. , title =. Perception & Psychophysics , year =

  180. [188]

    Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , year =

    Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi , title =. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , year =

  181. [189]

    Research in Engineering Design , year =

    Honda, Shimon and Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi , title =. Research in Engineering Design , year =

  182. [190]

    Journal of Engineering Design , year =

    Honda, Shimon and Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi and Kato, Takeo , title =. Journal of Engineering Design , year =

  183. [191]

    Research in Engineering Design , year =

    Sasaki, Hiromasa and Kato, Takeo and Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi , title =. Research in Engineering Design , year =

  184. [192]

    2023 , issn =

    Free energy model of emotional valence in dual-process perceptions , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.10.027 , url =

    2023 doi

  185. [193]

    PLOS ONE , year =

    Ueda, Kazutaka and Wu, Xiaoxiang and Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi , title =. PLOS ONE , year =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.