Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Minimization-based polynomial corrections for high-order curved boundaries on fixed and moving domains: assessment on finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that ROD-type high-order boundary conditions on curved domains can be imposed pointwise as simple polynomial corrections, eliminating the per-cell constraint-matrix inversion and preserving high-order accuracy on fixed and…

desk verdict Useful matrix-inversion-free boundary correction with broad numerical support, but multi-D pointwise consistency is asserted rather than proved and one slip-wall table shows an unexplained order drop. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05768 v1 pith:RZ5YDCR5 submitted 2026-08-06 math.NA cs.NAphysics.comp-ph

Mirco Ciallella , Walter Boscheri This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NAphysics.comp-ph MSC 65M6065M0865N5076N15
keywords curveddomainshigh-orderboundaryconditionsReconstructionforOff-siteDatapolynomialcorrectiondiscontinuousGalerkinADER-ALEfinitevolumecompressibleEulerequationsmovingmeshes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the Reconstruction for Off-site Data (ROD) boundary treatment, normally posed as a constrained minimization that needs inversion of a $K\times K$ linear system in each boundary cell, can be rewritten as a pointwise polynomial correction that needs no matrix inversion. In the corrected form, a single boundary constraint is enforced at the physical-boundary point corresponding to each quadrature point on the computational boundary, and the modified polynomial value is obtained directly from evaluations of the basis functions. The claim is developed and tested in a Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin framework on fixed curved domains and in an ADER arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian finite volume framework on moving curved domains. If correct, high-order accuracy on simple simplicial linear meshes becomes substantially cheaper and easier to implement, especially for moving boundaries.

What carries the argument

The key object is the signed-distance mapping between computational and physical boundaries, $\bar{x}=\tilde{x}+d(\tilde{x})n$, together with the single-constraint ROD polynomial generated along that mapping. The correction formula $v_h(\tilde x)=[\varphi(\tilde x)-\alpha\,\varphi(\bar x)]^T\hat u+\alpha\,u_D(\bar x)$ is obtained by solving the one-constraint optimality system analytically; $\alpha$ is the ratio of two inner products of basis evaluations at $\tilde{x}$ and $\bar{x}$, with the mass matrix inserted for ROD-L2. This machinery converts a boundary-condition imposition that required assembling and inverting $\Phi^T(\bar{x})\Phi(\bar{x})$ into a scalar evaluation per quadrature point, so the per-boundary-cell cost drops from $O(K^3+K^2D+KD)$ to $O(KD)$ for ROD-E and $O(KD^2+KD)$ for ROD-L2.

What would settle it

Run a DG-P3 manufactured-solution test on a domain with a single circular-arc boundary face, so any local consistency defect cannot cancel through symmetry, and measure the $L^2$ error convergence in all conserved variables. If the pointwise correction introduces a defect of order below $p+1$ that happens to cancel only on the concentric-geometry tests in the paper, the observed order will drop below the designed value on this single-arc geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the ROD constrained-minimization problem reduces, at each boundary point, to a closed-form correction of the internal polynomial. For a point $\tilde{x}$ on the computational boundary mapped to $\bar{x}$ on the physical boundary, the corrected value is $v_h(\tilde x)=[\varphi(\tilde x)-\alpha\,\varphi(\bar x)]^T\hat u+\alpha\,u_D(\bar x)$, where $\varphi$ is the polynomial basis, $\hat u$ the internal degrees of freedom, and $\alpha$ is chosen so that $v_h(\bar x)=u_D(\bar x)$ exactly. Proposition 2 gives $\alpha_{\mathrm{ROD-E}}=\varphi^T(\tilde x)\varphi(\bar x)/\|\varphi(\bar x)\|_2^2$ for the Euclidean distance, and Proposition 3 gives the mass-matrix-weighted analogue for the $L^2$ distance. Applied independently at every boundary quadrature point, these corrections replace the cell-wise ROD polynomial and its $K\times K$ constraint system. The paper presents this as a new scheme in multiple dimensions, distinct from the original ROD, and supports it with convergence tests up to fifth order in 2D and fourth order in 3D for Euler flows.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that imposing one boundary condition per boundary quadrature point, independently, preserves the designed high order in multiple dimensions; Section 4.3 asserts this while always preserving high-order consistency but supplies no proof, so the numerical convergence tables are the only support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • No constraint matrix is assembled or inverted per boundary cell: ROD-E costs $O(KD)$ and ROD-L2 costs $O(KD^2+KD)$ instead of the $O(K^3+K^2D+KD)$ of the original ROD method.
  • On fixed simplicial meshes, uncorrected Dirichlet and slip-wall boundary conditions limit convergence to second order; the ROD-E and ROD-L2 corrections restore the designed order, observed up to fifth order in 2D and fourth order in 3D.
  • The same pointwise correction works in RK-DG, FV, and ADER frameworks whenever the internal solution has a polynomial representation, by replacing the degree-of-freedom vector $\hat u$.
  • On moving curved domains, the correction needs only evaluations of basis functions at the mapped boundary points, so it avoids the per-time-step, per-cell matrix inversion that the original ROD formulation requires.
  • The moving-domain tests, including a horizontally oscillating cylinder, show that the correction suppresses spurious boundary layers and entropy production near curved walls.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the correction depends only on basis evaluations at the mapped point, the same formula could be inserted into any polynomial-based discretization with a boundary cell, including nodal spectral element methods or embedded ghost-cell solvers, without per-cell matrix assembly.
  • For high polynomial degrees, ROD-L2's mass-matrix-weighted projection should control the boundary error better than ROD-E's Euclidean projection; a systematic stability comparison across $p$ and mesh families would test whether the extra $O(KD^2)$ cost is worthwhile.
  • The real computational win is on moving meshes: fixed meshes can precompute the constraint-matrix inverse, but moving meshes cannot, so eliminating that inversion removes a bottleneck that grows with polynomial degree and refinement.
  • The pointwise decoupling would allow mixed boundary-condition types on different parts of the same boundary face, such as Dirichlet on one segment and slip-wall on another, without extending the constraint system, which the original cell-wise ROD cannot do without additional constraints.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes two boundary correction methods, ROD-E and ROD-L2, which recast the Reconstruction for Off-site Data (ROD) approach as pointwise polynomial corrections. In place of solving a K x K constraint system per boundary cell, the methods evaluate formulas (36) and (41) independently at each boundary quadrature point, using one scalar parameter alpha to enforce the boundary condition at the corresponding physical boundary point. The corrections are developed for a Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin framework on fixed curved domains and an ADER arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian finite volume framework on moving curved domains. Convergence studies are presented for manufactured solutions, a supersonic vortex with slip walls, the Kidder problem, and an oscillating cylinder, with claimed accuracy up to fifth order in two and three dimensions.

Significance. If the central claim is valid, the paper provides a practically useful simplification: it removes the need to assemble and invert the ROD constraint matrix in every boundary cell at every time step, and it makes the correction easy to port across DG, FV, and ADER codes. The algebraic derivations in Propositions 2 and 3 are clean and self-contained, and the numerical campaign is broad, covering two spatial dimensions, three spatial dimensions, fixed and moving meshes, Dirichlet and slip-wall conditions, and both DG and FV/ADER frameworks. The main weakness is that the extension from the single-point algebraic identities to a global multi-dimensional consistency statement is asserted rather than proved, and several convergence tables contain order reductions that are not addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.3, Remark 4] The paper's central claim, stated in the Introduction and again in Section 4.3, is that applying the one-dimensional correction independently at each boundary quadrature point preserves high-order consistency in multiple dimensions. Propositions 2 and 3, however, prove only pointwise algebraic identities for a single quadrature point: they show how to express v_h(xtilde) in terms of u_hat and u_D(bar x). The manuscript does not provide any estimate for the resulting boundary flux error, nor an analysis of how the correction interacts with the quadrature rule, the mapping M, and the DG/FV weak forms in equations (6) and (22). A Taylor-based consistency argument would require, among other things, a bound on alpha - 1, a comparison of u_h(xtilde) with u_h(bar x), and regularity assumptions on the boundary. As written, the statement 'while always preserving high-order consistency' is an assertion rather than a proved theorem, and this is load-bearing for the paper's main contribution.
  2. [Table 2, DG-P2 slip-wall row] In the supersonic vortex slip-wall test, the finest-grid rho orders for DG-P2 are 2.46 for ROD-E and 2.76 for ROD-L2, both below the design order 3. On the intermediate mesh the two corrected methods also differ noticeably (1.43e-5 versus 1.76e-5 for rho), while they nearly coincide on the coarser meshes. No explanation is given. If this behavior persists under further refinement, it contradicts the claim that the corrections always preserve high-order consistency for slip-wall conditions. The paper should either explain the anomaly (e.g., as an asymptotic-range or time-integration effect) or restrict the consistency claim accordingly.
  3. [Tables 3 and 4, FV-P4 rows] The moving-domain manufactured-solution tests show a similar pattern at the highest polynomial degree: in both 2D and 3D, the corrected FV-P4 results have final-grid rho orders of 3.17 and U1 orders of 3.87, well below the expected fifth order. These numbers appear in tables whose stated purpose is to demonstrate that the corrections recover the designed convergence rates. The manuscript gives no comment on these reductions. They should be discussed, and if they are due to the boundary correction rather than to solver tolerances or quadrature limits, the claim of arbitrary-order consistency needs to be qualified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Equation (37)] The displayed formula for alpha_ROD-E contains an extra transpose in the numerator, reading phi^T(xtilde) phi^T(bar x); it should be phi^T(xtilde) phi(bar x), as used in the proof.
  2. [Equation (42)] The notation ||phi(bar x)||_{M^{-1}} is used without a definition; since M is a matrix, the reader must infer the M^{-1}-weighted norm. Defining this norm explicitly would improve clarity.
  3. [Table 1] The header row repeats 'rho rho U1' three times without labeling the three blocks as 'w/o correction', 'ROD-E', and 'ROD-L2'. This makes the table harder to read than the corresponding tables in the rest of the paper.
  4. [Introduction, Section 4.3] The text contains a typo: 'discontinous Galerkin' should be 'discontinuous Galerkin'. Also, the reliance on the unpublished preprint [30] for the stability properties of ROD-L2 should be indicated more clearly in the main text, since those properties are used to motivate the method.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ROD-E and ROD-L2 corrections are derived from explicit optimality conditions and validated against manufactured/exact solutions; the only self-citation is contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained for the algebraic core. Proposition 2 and Proposition 3 (Section 4.3) derive the polynomial correction formulas directly from the first-order optimality conditions of the single-constraint minimization problems (33) and (38). The coefficients alpha are explicit functions of basis evaluations and the mass matrix, with no fitted parameters calibrated to the numerical results. The ghost state v_h(x_tilde) is not a prediction of independent data; it is the designed enforcement of the known boundary data u_D(x_bar) transferred from the physical boundary to the computational boundary. The numerical convergence tests against manufactured solutions and exact solutions (Tables 1, 3, 4, 5) provide independently checkable support, and the comparison against the uncorrected method isolates the effect of the correction. The only self-citation is reference [30], used for the one-dimensional analysis and for the statement that ROD-L2 has better stability properties than ROD-E; the multi-dimensional claim is asserted rather than proven ('while always preserving high-order consistency', Section 4.3), and Table 2 shows DG-P2 slip-wall orders (2.46 and 2.76) below the design order 3 on the finest grid. These are rigor and robustness concerns, not circular reductions: neither the formulas nor the convergence claims reduce by construction to the cited one-dimensional analysis or to fitted inputs. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. The central assumptions are the existence of the boundary mapping, the availability of a polynomial internal representation, and the unproven pointwise multi-D consistency.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The boundary mapping M: x_tilde -> x_bar = x_tilde + d(x_tilde) n is well-defined and unique for all boundary quadrature points, using exact boundary normals.
    Section 4, Eq. (27); needed to define the correction pointwise. Fails for non-smooth or self-intersecting boundaries.
  • ad hoc to paper The 1D single-constraint consistency result of [30] extends to multi-D pointwise application at each quadrature point.
    Intro and Section 4.3 assert high-order consistency for the pointwise multi-D correction, but no proof or error estimate is given.
  • domain assumption The internal solution is representable as a polynomial on boundary cells (DG polynomial, FV reconstruction, or ADER space-time predictor).
    Section 4.3, Remark 4; the correction is defined through the basis coefficients u_hat.
  • standard math The mass matrix M in ROD-L2 is invertible for the chosen nodal basis.
    Proposition 3 requires M^{-1}; true for positive-definite mass matrices on simplicial elements.
  • standard math The manufactured solutions and source terms satisfy the Euler equations exactly.
    Sections 5.1 and 6.1; used to measure convergence. Straightforward differentiation verifies the consistency of the source terms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Minimization-based polynomial corrections for high-order curved boundaries on fixed and moving domains: assessment on finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZ5YDCR5

@misc{pith2026260805768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Minimization-based polynomial corrections for high-order curved boundaries on fixed and moving domains: assessment on finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZ5YDCR5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05768}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we present two novel strategies to impose high-order boundary conditions on fixed and moving curved domains, approximated with piecewise affine triangulations. Achieving high-order accuracy on curved domains requires tackling both the PDE discretization error and the geometrical error simultaneously. While the former can be reduced by employing high-order numerical methods such as finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin, the latter demands either a high-order parametrization of the physical domain or a consistent approximation of the boundary conditions. Minimization-based approaches like the Reconstruction for Off-site Data (ROD) method allow one to skip the construction of high-order curvilinear meshes by defining high-order consistent boundary conditions on a computational boundary that does not match the physical one. The ROD approach mitigates the second-order geometrical error by retrieving a modified polynomial in each boundary cell, which enforces the boundary conditions exactly on the physical boundary. However, the standard ROD method requires the inversion of a local linear system, whose cost grows with the polynomial degree and mesh refinement. Inspired by a recent one-dimensional analysis, we show that ROD-type approaches can be recast as simple polynomial corrections, applicable without any linear system inversion. This greatly simplifies the development of minimization-based boundary treatments and reduces the associated computational cost. To prove the wide applicability of our strategy, we develop it within a Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin framework and an ADER arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian finite volume framework for compressible flows on fixed and moving domains. Several numerical experiments with Dirichlet and slip-wall boundary conditions are presented, with convergence analysis up to fifth order in both 2D and 3D.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The mapping M (in blue) between the computational boundary (in green) and the physical curved boundary (in red) for 2D linear meshes. 4.1. Literature of the Reconstruction for Off-site Data method The Reconstruction for Off-site Data (ROD) method is a high-order boundary treatment based on a constrained minimization problem. It was firstly introduced in the context of FV schemes to preserve the high-order accuracy w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Manufactured solution on 2D fixed meshes: DG- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Supersonic vortex bounded by two circular walls on 2D fixed meshes: DG- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Manufactured solution on 2D and 3D moving meshes: initial (left) and final (right) mesh configuration. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Kidder problem in 2D: initial (left) and final (right) mesh configuration. The mesh is moving radially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Horizontal oscillating cylinder: initial mesh configuration (right) and a zoom close to the cylinder (left). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Horizontal oscillating cylinder: velocity component [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Horizontal oscillating cylinder: entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    M. Ciallella, Minimization-based embedded boundary methods as polynomial correc- tions: a stability study of discontinuous galerkin for hyperbolic equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05278 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Hillewaert, H

    Z.Wang, K.Fidkowski, R.Abgrall, F.Bassi, D.Caraeni, A.Cary, H.Deconinck, R.Hartmann, K. Hillewaert, H. Huynh, N. Kroll, G. May, P.-O. Persson, B. van Leer, M. Visbal, High-order cfd methods: current status and perspective, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 72 (8) (2013) 811–845

    work page 2013

  3. [2]

    Cockburn, C.-W

    B. Cockburn, C.-W. Shu, The runge–kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws v: multidimensional systems, Journal of Computational Physics 141 (2) (1998) 199–224

    work page 1998

  4. [3]

    Jiang, C.-W

    G.-S. Jiang, C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted eno schemes, Journal of com- putational physics 126 (1) (1996) 202–228

    work page 1996

  5. [4]

    Dumbser, D

    M. Dumbser, D. S. Balsara, E. F. Toro, C.-D. Munz, A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes, Journal of Computational Physics 227 (18) (2008) 8209–8253

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Bassi, S

    F. Bassi, S. Rebay, High-order accurate discontinuous finite element solution of the 2d euler equations, Journal of computational physics 138 (2) (1997) 251–285

    work page 1997

  7. [6]

    Zienkiewicz, P

    O. Zienkiewicz, P. Morice, The finite element method in engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1971

    work page 1971

  8. [7]

    Hughes, J

    T. Hughes, J. Cottrell, Y. Bazilevs, Isogeometric analysis: Cad, finite elements, nurbs, exact geometry, and mesh refinement, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 194 (2005) 33–40

    work page 2005

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    Pezzano, R

    S. Pezzano, R. Duvigneau, A nurbs-based discontinuous galerkin method for conservation laws with high-order moving meshes, Journal of Computational Physics 434 (2021) 110093. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110093. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0...

    2021

  2. [9]

    S. Dey, R. M. O’Bara, M. S. Shephard, Towards curvilinear meshing in 3d: the case of quadratic simplices, Computer-Aided Design 33 (3) (2001) 199–209

    2001

  3. [10]

    X.-J. Luo, M. S. Shephard, R. M. O’bara, R. Nastasia, M. W. Beall, Automatic p-version mesh generation for curved domains, Engineering with Computers 20 (3) (2004) 273–285

    2004

  4. [11]

    Sahni, X

    O. Sahni, X. Luo, K. Jansen, M. Shephard, Curved boundary layer meshing for adaptive viscous flow simulations, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 46 (1-2) (2010) 132–139. 28

    2010

  5. [12]

    Kucharik, J

    M. Kucharik, J. Breil, S. Galera, P.-H. Maire, M. Berndt, M. Shashkov, Hybrid remap for multi-material ale, Computers & Fluids 46 (1) (2011) 293–297

    2011

  6. [13]

    Shashkov, Closure models for multimaterial cells in arbitrary lagrangian–eulerian hy- drocodes, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 56 (8) (2008) 1497–1504

    M. Shashkov, Closure models for multimaterial cells in arbitrary lagrangian–eulerian hy- drocodes, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 56 (8) (2008) 1497–1504

    2008

  7. [14]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, Arbitrary-lagrangian-eulerian one-step weno finite volume schemes on unstructured triangular meshes, Communications in Computational Physics 14 (5) (2013) 1174–1206

    2013

  8. [15]

    Munz, On godunov-type schemes for lagrangian gas dynamics, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 31 (1) (1994) 17–42

    C. Munz, On godunov-type schemes for lagrangian gas dynamics, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 31 (1) (1994) 17–42

    1994

  9. [16]

    Carré, S

    G. Carré, S. Del Pino, B. Després, E. Labourasse, A cell-centered lagrangian hydrodynamics scheme on general unstructured meshes in arbitrary dimension, Journal of Computational Physics 228 (14) (2009) 5160–5183

    2009

  10. [17]

    Després, C

    B. Després, C. Mazeran, Symmetrization of lagrangian gas dynamic in dimension two and multidimensional solvers, Comptes Rendus Mecanique 331 (7) (2003) 475–480

    2003

  11. [18]

    N. M. Atallah, V. Z. Tomov, G. Scovazzi, Weak boundary conditions for lagrangian shock hydrodynamics: A high-order finite element implementation on curved boundaries, Journal of Computational Physics 507 (2024) 112959

    2024

  12. [19]

    Kincl, I

    O. Kincl, I. Peshkov, W. Boscheri, Semi-implicit lagrangian voronoi approximation for the incompressiblenavier–stokesequations, InternationalJournalforNumericalMethodsinFluids 97 (1) (2025) 88–115

    2025

  13. [20]

    Maire, A high-order cell-centered Lagrangian scheme for two-dimensional compressible fluid flows on unstructured meshes., J

    P. Maire, A high-order cell-centered Lagrangian scheme for two-dimensional compressible fluid flows on unstructured meshes., J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 2391–2425

    2009

  14. [21]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, High order accurate direct arbitrary-lagrangian-eulerian ader-weno finite volume schemes on moving curvilinear unstructured meshes, Computers & Fluids 136 (2016) 48–66

    2016

  15. [22]

    Z. Wang, Y. Sun, Curvature-based wall boundary condition for the euler equations on un- structured grids, AIAA journal 41 (1) (2003)

    2003

  16. [23]

    Krivodonova, M

    L. Krivodonova, M. Berger, High-order accurate implementation of solid wall boundary con- ditions in curved geometries, Journal of computational physics 211 (2) (2006) 492–512

    2006

  17. [24]

    Costa, S

    R. Costa, S. Clain, R. Loubère, G. J. Machado, Very high-order accurate finite volume scheme on curved boundaries for the two-dimensional steady-state convection–diffusion equation with dirichlet condition, Applied Mathematical Modelling 54 (2018) 752–767

    2018

  18. [25]

    Costa, J

    R. Costa, J. M. Nóbrega, S. Clain, G. J. Machado, R. Loubère, Very high-order accurate finite volume scheme for the convection-diffusion equation with general boundary conditions on arbitrary curved boundaries, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 117 (2)...

    2019

  19. [26]

    Santos, A

    M. Santos, A. Araújo, S. Barbeiro, S. Clain, R. Costa, G. J. Machado, Very high-order accurate discontinuous galerkin method for curved boundaries with polygonal meshes, Journal of Scientific Computing 100 (3) (2024) 66

    2024

  20. [27]

    M.Ciallella, E.Gaburro, M.Lorini, M.Ricchiuto, Shiftedboundarypolynomialcorrectionsfor compressible flows: high order on curved domains using linear meshes, Applied Mathematics and Computation 441 (2023) 127698

    2023

  21. [28]

    Ciallella, S

    M. Ciallella, S. Clain, E. Gaburro, M. Ricchiuto, Very high order treatment of embedded curved boundaries in compressible flows: Ader discontinuous galerkin with a space-time re- construction for off-site data, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 175 (2024) 1–18

    2024

  22. [29]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Ciallella, High order treatment of moving curved boundaries: Arbitrary- lagrangian-eulerian methods with a shifted boundary polynomial correction, Journal of Com- putational Physics 539 (2025) 114215

    2025

  23. [31]

    J. C. Butcher, Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations in the 20th century, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 125 (1-2) (2000) 1–29

    2000

  24. [32]

    Gottlieb, C.-W

    S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu, E. Tadmor, Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods, SIAM review 43 (1) (2001) 89–112

    2001

  25. [33]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, A direct arbitrary-lagrangian–eulerian ader-weno finite volume scheme on unstructured tetrahedral meshes for conservative and non-conservative hyperbolic systems in 3d, Journal of Computational Physics 275 (2014) 484–523

    2014

  26. [34]

    Dumbser, M

    M. Dumbser, M. Käser, Arbitrary high order non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on un- structured meshes for linear hyperbolic systems, Journal of Computational Physics 221 (2) (2007) 693–723

    2007

  27. [35]

    Dumbser, M

    M. Dumbser, M. Käser, V. A. Titarev, E. F. Toro, Quadrature-free non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on unstructured meshes for nonlinear hyperbolic systems, Journal of Com- putational Physics 226 (1) (2007) 204–243

    2007

  28. [36]

    Dumbser, A

    M. Dumbser, A. Uuriintsetseg, O. Zanotti, On arbitrary-lagrangian-eulerian one-step weno schemes for stiff hyperbolic balance laws, Communications in Computational Physics 14 (2) (2013) 301–327

    2013

  29. [37]

    Boscheri, R

    W. Boscheri, R. Loubere, M. Dumbser, Direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian ADER-MOOD finite volume schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Compu- tational Physics 292 (2015) 56–87

    2015

  30. [38]

    Gaburro, W

    E. Gaburro, W. Boscheri, S. Chiocchetti, C. Klingenberg, V. Springel, M. Dumbser, High order direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian schemes on moving voronoi meshes with topology changes, Journal of Computational Physics 407 (2020) 109167. 30

    2020

  31. [39]

    Gaburro, M

    E. Gaburro, M. Klima, M. Bonafini, M. Tavelli, On the treatment of topology changes on 3d polyhedral moving meshes via 4d space-time hole-like elements in direct ale ader-dg methods, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.23506 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Dumbser, E

    M. Dumbser, E. F. Toro, On universal osher-type schemes for general nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, Communications in Computational Physics 10 (3) (2011) 635–671

    2011

  33. [41]

    Löhner, C

    R. Löhner, C. Yang, Improved ale mesh velocities for moving bodies, Communications in numerical methods in engineering 12 (10) (1996) 599–608

    1996

  34. [42]

    B. T. Helenbrook, Mesh deformation using the biharmonic operator, International journal for numerical methods in engineering 56 (7) (2003) 1007–1021

    2003

  35. [43]

    R. P. Dwight, Robust mesh deformation using the linear elasticity equations, in: Computa- tional Fluid Dynamics 2006: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Com- putational Fluid Dynamics, ICCFD, Ghent, Belgium, 10-14 July 2006, Springer, 2009, pp. 401–406

    2006

  36. [44]

    Stein, T

    K. Stein, T. Tezduyar, R. Benney, Mesh moving techniques for fluid-structure interactions with large displacements, J. Appl. Mech. 70 (1) (2003) 58–63

    2003

  37. [45]

    Costa, J

    R. Costa, J. M. Nóbrega, S. Clain, G. J. Machado, Efficient very high-order accurate polyhe- dral mesh finite volume scheme for 3d conjugate heat transfer problems in curved domains, Journal of Computational Physics 445 (2021) 110604

    2021

  38. [46]

    Costa, S

    R. Costa, S. Clain, G. J. Machado, J. M. Nóbrega, Very high-order accurate finite volume scheme for the steady-state incompressible navier–stokes equations with polygonal meshes on arbitrary curved boundaries, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 396 (2022) 115064

    2022

  39. [47]

    Costa, S

    R. Costa, S. Clain, G. J. Machado, J. M. Nóbrega, H. B. da Veiga, F. Crispo, Imposing slip conditions on curved boundaries for 3d incompressible flows with a very high-order accurate finite volume scheme on polygonal meshes, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineerin...

    2023

  40. [48]

    Ciallella, Stability analysis of discontinuous galerkin with a high order embedded boundary treatment for linear hyperbolic equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.23231 (2025)

    M. Ciallella, Stability analysis of discontinuous galerkin with a high order embedded boundary treatment for linear hyperbolic equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.23231 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    A. Main, G. Scovazzi, The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. part I: Poisson and Stokes problems, Journal of Computational Physics 372 (2018) 972–995. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.026

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    Kidder, Laser-driven compression of hollow shells: power requirements and stability limi- tations, Nuclear Fusion 16 (1) (1976) 3

    R. Kidder, Laser-driven compression of hollow shells: power requirements and stability limi- tations, Nuclear Fusion 16 (1) (1976) 3

    1976

  43. [51]

    G. J. Gassner, A skew-symmetric discontinuous galerkin spectral element discretization and its relation to sbp-sat finite difference methods, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 35 (3) (2013) A1233–A1253. 31

    2013

  44. [52]

    Visbech, A

    J. Visbech, A. P. Engsig-Karup, M. Ricchiuto, A spectral element solution of the poisson equation with shifted boundary polynomial corrections: influence of the surrogate to true boundary mapping and an asymptotically preserving robin formulation, Journal of Scientific Computi...

    2025

  45. [53]

    M. Gao, D. Appel, A. Beck, C.-D. Munz, A high-order fluid–structure interaction framework with application to shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction over an elastic panel, Journal of Fluids and Structures 121 (2023) 103950. 32

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.