Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 38 references

SkillMemo: Expert-guided Skill Memory Framework for Compositional Embodied Manipulation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SkillMemo claims that a skill-level episodic memory lets visuomotor policies recombine known movement primitives, lifting zero-shot success on unseen task compositions across DP and VLA backbones.

desk verdict A plausible memory-augmented skill framework whose central fusion equation is under-specified; needs a major revision before the reported gains can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05970 v1 pith:VIABQEZZ submitted 2026-08-06 cs.RO cs.AI

Changyuan Wang , Chubin Zhang , Zhenyu Wu , Runhao Li , Angyuan Ma , Ke Chao , Yinan Liang , Xiuwei Xu
show 3 more authors
Ziwei Wang Yansong Tang Jiwen Lu
This is my paper
classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords skilllearningmemory-augmentedpolicyrobotmanipulationmixture-of-expertscompositionalgeneralizationvision-language-actionmodelsdiffusionepisodicmemory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SkillMemo is a framework for adding a skill-level memory to robotic manipulation policies. The paper claims that by implicitly splitting demonstrations into latent atomic skills with a Mixture-of-Experts routing module and storing those skills as retrievable gating profiles in an episodic memory bank, both Diffusion Policy and Vision-Language-Action models improve on LIBERO and on real-world tasks. The headline result is that augmenting the π0.5 VLA with SkillMemo reaches 98.0% average success versus 96.8% for π0.5, and that models trained on one LIBERO suite generalize zero-shot to unseen suites. The reason a reader might care is that this offers a route to compositional generalization from limited demonstrations: recombining known skills instead of memorizing whole trajectories.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the skill-level episodic memory built on Mixture-of-Experts gating. The MoE layer's gating coefficients over K experts act as an implicit, label-free segmentation of a trajectory into atomic skill primitives; a memory bank stores each discovered segment as a key-value pair, with the segment's mean latent feature as the key and the sequence of gating weights as the value. During inference the bank retrieves the most similar keys and fuses the retrieved gating sequences into the current gating distribution via a weighted average (Eq. 7), using an alignment index t' that maps the current time step into each retrieved sequence. This fusion is what the paper claims turns stored experience into a contextual prior for action prediction.

What would settle it

Run LIBERO with the retrieved gating sequences in Eq. (7) replaced by randomly selected time steps within each segment; if the 98.0% success rate survives, the temporal alignment is irrelevant, and if it drops, the unpublished alignment rule is carrying the reported gain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that long-horizon manipulation demonstrations can be decomposed, without any action labels, into reusable atomic skills, and that storing these skills in an episodic memory bank lets a policy synthesize unseen behaviors by recombining them. The decomposition is done implicitly by a Mixture-of-Experts layer whose gating weights over five experts vary sharply at semantic boundaries such as grasping or turning on a stove. Each skill segment is stored as a key-value pair: the key is the mean latent feature of the segment, and the value is the full sequence of gating weights over the segment. At inference, the current observation's latent feature retrieves the top-N most similar keys by cosine similarity, and if the average similarity exceeds a threshold, the retrieved gating profiles are averaged into the current gating distribution. The paper reports that this consistently improves several backbones, including Diffusion Policy, UniAct, UniVLA, and π0.5, and that the resulting model outperforms π0.5 on LIBERO (98.0% vs 96.8%).

Load-bearing premise

The fusion step in Eq. (7) assumes the current time step can be aligned to a specific time step t' inside each retrieved skill sequence, but the paper never states how that alignment is computed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Both diffusion-based and VLA-based policies are claimed to improve when the SkillMemo memory is added, so the mechanism is presented as backbone-agnostic.
  • Models trained on one LIBERO suite show zero-shot gains on unseen suites; the Goal-trained model reaches 75.6% on Spatial, above the in-distribution Spatial baseline's 72.1%.
  • On real-world unseen object-receptacle combinations, success rates improve by up to 12.5 percentage points over the DP baseline, e.g., Strawberry on Plate from 65.0% to 75.0%.
  • The dynamic pruning strategy (timestamp, usage, and reliability-based removal) is claimed to keep the finite-capacity memory bank compact and relevant for lifelong learning.
  • Increasing expert count from 1 to 10 steadily improves accuracy with diminishing returns beyond N=5, which the paper sets as the default.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The alignment index t' in Eq. (7) is never defined, so the core fusion equation is underspecified; the reported gains may depend on an unpublished alignment heuristic.
  • If the memory bank is simply retrieving near-duplicate gating profiles, the 'compositional' claim reduces to nearest-neighbor smoothing; a diagnostic would be to compare against retrieving random segments from the same task.
  • The real-world gains are shown only on a single UR5e setup with 50 demos per task; scaling to more diverse demonstrations and tasks would test whether the memory bank remains useful.
  • The PID-based synergy loss is presented as a regularizer, but its contribution is not isolated in the ablations; ablating it would show whether expert specialization comes from the loss or from the MoE architecture itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SkillMemo, a skill-level memory framework for robotic manipulation policies. It introduces an MoE-based trajectory segmentation module (EGTS) that implicitly partitions demonstrations into latent atomic skills via gating coefficients, a skill-level episodic memory bank that stores centroid keys and gating-sequence values, and an inference-time fusion mechanism that retrieves and averages stored gating profiles into the policy's current gating distribution. The authors evaluate SkillMemo with Diffusion Policy and VLA backbones (UniAct, UniVLA, π0.5) on LIBERO, Push-T, BlockPush, Kitchen, and real-world UR5e tasks, reporting consistent improvements and a headline 98.0% average success on LIBERO for π0.5-SkillMemo versus 96.8% for π0.5.

Significance. Should the mechanism be fully specified and the results reproducible, SkillMemo would be a useful plug-in skill-retrieval module for both DP and VLA policies. The paper's strengths include its breadth of backbones, the inclusion of zero-shot cross-suite and real-world compositional generalization experiments, and explicit component ablations. The claim that memory of gating profiles improves compositional generalization is falsifiable and not guaranteed by construction: no computed quantity reduces directly to a fitted parameter. However, the key memory-fusion equations are under-specified as written, and all quantitative claims lack variance estimates, which substantially weakens the evidence for the headline improvements.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (7)] The index t′ in Eq. (7) is never defined. The phrase 'vn[t′] corresponds to the aligned timestep within the retrieved skill sequence' is not an alignment rule. Because g′(qt) is the only pathway through which memory enters the policy, without a concrete rule mapping the current rollout time to a position inside each retrieved skill sequence, the memory-fusion step has no grounded meaning and the reported memory gains in Tables 1, 4, and 5 cannot be reproduced. Please specify the alignment procedure (e.g., relative progress, dynamic time warping, or a learned time embedding) and state how it handles retrieved skills whose durations differ from the current skill.
  2. [Sections 3.1–3.2, Eqs. (1), (4), (5)] The paper claims implicit trajectory segmentation but never defines the mapping from the gating time series to the stored segments τm. Eq. (1) defines fixed-length non-overlapping segments with chunk size L, yet Section 3.1 states that explicit segmentation is replaced by implicit boundary detection, and no boundary-detection or thresholding procedure is given. Eq. (4) divides by L and Eq. (5) stores 'the complete sequence of gating weights across all time steps within the segment,' which presupposes a well-defined segment of known length. Please state how boundaries are detected from g(ht), whether segments are fixed-length or variable-length, how L is chosen, and how the memory values in Eq. (5) are constructed from the implicit partition.
  3. [Sections 4.2–4.4, Tables 1–7] All success rates are reported as point estimates with no error bars, seed counts, or significance tests. The headline result (π0.5-SkillMemo 98.0% vs π0.5 96.8%) is a 1.2% difference based on 50 rollouts per task across four LIBERO suites; without variance or multiple seeds this could be within sampling noise. Please report mean ± std across at least three seeds for the simulation benchmarks and confidence intervals for the 40-trial real-world results.
  4. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3)] The LPID regularization term is not operationalized. The notation I({A,B};G) and the mutual-information terms involving high-dimensional expert/feature variables are not defined, no estimator is provided, and this loss is not ablated separately from the rest of the EGTS module. As written, this component of the method cannot be reimplemented. Please specify the exact variables, the mutual-information estimator used, and an ablation isolating the contribution of LPID.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 4] The row and column labels of Table 4 are ambiguous: the rows are training suites, but the caption reads as if they are datasets. Please make the 'trained on / evaluated on' structure explicit.
  2. [Abstract and Section 1] The text says the method 'outperforms π0.5'; more precisely, SkillMemo is applied on top of π0.5, so the comparison is π0.5-SkillMemo versus π0.5. Please clarify this wording.
  3. [Appendix A.1] The hyperparameter list omits the memory fusion weight λ, the reliability threshold δ, and the retrieval top-N value used in the experiments. Please add these values and describe how they were selected.
  4. [Table 2] The inference-time measurements in Table 2 are reported without standard deviations or a description of how they were aggregated across runs. Please specify the measurement procedure.
  5. [Table 7 caption] The caption says 'Marks with !' but the table uses exclamation marks; please use a more descriptive marker and explain in the caption what each mark denotes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SkillMemo is an empirical architecture, and the memory-fusion operation, though under-specified at Eq. (7), does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical one: adding MoE-based skill segmentation and a skill-level memory bank improves DP and VLA backbones. No derived quantity is identical to a fitted input by construction. Eq. (7) fuses the current gating distribution with retrieved gating profiles via a weighted average; this is a compositional operation, not a tautology. The stored values are the model's own training-time gating sequences, which is self-referential in a broad sense, but retrieval and fusion feed a new forward pass and the results are measured against external benchmarks, so the prediction is not forced by the construction. The paper cites MAP-VLA (Ref. [31]) with overlapping authors, but only as related work on 'temporal tokens or learnable prompts'; it is not load-bearing for any claimed result. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked, and no known pattern is merely renamed. The genuine weakness is Eq. (7)'s 'aligned timestep t'' and the unspecified segmentation of continuous gating into discrete memory segments, which makes the mechanism hard to reproduce; however, an undefined index is a completeness gap, not circularity. The empirical comparisons in Tables 1, 3, 4, and 5 could be wrong, implausible, or under-reported, but they are not circular in the sense of deriving the answer from the premise.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on several hyperparameters (N, L, λ, δ) and on implicit assumptions about the interpretability of MoE gating, the reliability of cosine-similarity retrieval, and the existence of a temporal alignment between current and stored gating sequences. The paper reports values only for N and M_max, leaving the others unspecified.

free parameters (5)
  • Expert count N = 5
    Chosen by ablation on LIBERO (Table 2); larger N improves accuracy but increases inference time, so N=5 is used in the main results. This selection is based on the same benchmark used to report final performance, with no separate validation split described.
  • Skill chunk length L = unspecified
    Used in Eq. (1) and Eq. (4) to define skill segments and memory keys, but no value or segmentation algorithm is given in the paper.
  • Memory fusion weight λ = unspecified
    Controls the balance between current gating and retrieved gating in Eq. (7); no value or tuning procedure is reported.
  • Reliability threshold δ = unspecified
    Used to decide whether retrieved memories are reliable enough to fuse; no value or sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • Memory capacity M_max = 1000
    Maximum number of stored skill entries; set in Appendix A.1, though its effect on performance is not analyzed.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard information-theoretic definitions and the Partial Information Decomposition identity used in the LPID regularizer (Eq. 3) are valid and computable for the learned neural features.
    The loss is stated but no estimator, implementation, or ablation is provided; the paper does not show how I({A,B};G) is estimated.
  • domain assumption The MoE gating distribution g(h_t) is a faithful representation of discrete reusable skills, and averaging retrieved gating profiles with the current prediction improves action quality.
    The whole method treats routing weights as semantically meaningful skills; evidence is qualitative (Figure 3) and no quantitative test of gating interpretability is given.
  • ad hoc to paper There exists a well-defined temporal alignment between the current rollout and each retrieved skill sequence, so that v_n[t'] in Eq. (7) selects the correct stored gating value.
    No algorithm for computing t' is provided; this is introduced specifically to make Eq. (7) work.
  • domain assumption Cosine similarity between the latent feature q_t and stored memory keys k_m reliably selects the most relevant skill for the current state.
    Retrieval quality is not validated; thresholds and failure cases are not analyzed.
invented entities (1)
  • Latent atomic skills
    purpose: Latent behavioral primitives discovered by MoE gating, stored and retrieved by the memory bank to support compositional generalization.
    The skills are internal learned constructs; the paper provides only qualitative gating visualizations (Figure 3) and no external behavioral handle that distinguishes one skill from another.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SkillMemo: Expert-guided Skill Memory Framework for Compositional Embodied Manipulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VIABQEZZ

@misc{pith2026260805970,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SkillMemo: Expert-guided Skill Memory Framework for Compositional Embodied Manipulation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VIABQEZZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05970}
}
abstract

Embodied visuomotor models, including Diffusion Policy (DP) and Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, have demonstrated promising performance on robotic manipulation benchmarks. However, their potential remains fundamentally constrained by the scarcity of large-scale embodied trajectory datasets, leading to insufficient compositional generalization in out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios with limited capability to capture reusable skill structures. To address this limitation, we propose Skill-Based Memory (SkillMemo) framework that implicitly decomposes long-horizon demonstrations into latent atomic skills and integrates skill-level features into a dynamic episodic memory bank for solving compositional tasks. Specifically, we first introduce an expert-guided trajectory segmentation module built upon a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, which implicitly partitions trajectories into distinct skill primitives represented by learned gating coefficients. We further design a skill-level episodic memory architecture that stores compact skill representations as retrievable key-value pairs. During inference, the memory bank retrieves the most relevant skill primitives which are subsequently fused with the model's current gating distribution, providing a robust contextual prior to refine action predictions. Extensive experiments on the simulation benchmark and real-world manipulation tasks demonstrate that SkillMemo consistently enhances both DP and VLA backbones, achieving state-of-the-art performance and outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$, while exhibiting strong compositional generalization to unseen task configurations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05970 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Unlike conventional models that struggle to capture reusable skill structures, our method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the SkillMemo framework. The Expert-Guided Trajectory Segmentation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visualization of expert activation weights over time. The gating coefficients dynamically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hardware setup for real-world experiments, featuring a UR5e manipulator, WSG-50 gripper, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of successful rollouts for real-world manipulation tasks using the SkillMemo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, page 02783649241273668, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Y . Wang, Y . Zhang, M. Huo, R. Tian, X. Zhang, Y . Xie, C. Xu, P. Ji, W. Zhan, M. Ding, et al. Sparse diffusion policy: A sparse, reusable, and flexible policy for robot learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01531, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    K. Rana, R. Lee, D. Pershouse, and N. Suenderhauf. Imle policy: Fast and sample effi- cient visuomotor policy learning via implicit maximum likelihood estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12371, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    D. Qu, H. Song, Q. Chen, Y . Yao, X. Ye, Y . Ding, Z. Wang, J. Gu, B. Zhao, D. Wang, et al. Spatialvla: Exploring spatial representations for visual-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15830, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    S. Deng, M. Yan, S. Wei, H. Ma, Y . Yang, J. Chen, Z. Zhang, T. Yang, X. Zhang, H. Cui, et al. Graspvla: a grasping foundation model pre-trained on billion-scale synthetic action data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03233, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Q. Bu, Y . Yang, J. Cai, S. Gao, G. Ren, M. Yao, P. Luo, and H. Li. Univla: Learning to act anywhere with task-centric latent actions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06111, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Intelligence, K

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, et al. π0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Foster, G. Lam, P. Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    O’Neill, A

    A. O’Neill, A. Rehman, A. Maddukuri, A. Gupta, A. Padalkar, A. Lee, A. Pooley, A. Gupta, A. Mandlekar, A. Jain, et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automati...

    2024

  2. [10]

    Khazatsky, K

    A. Khazatsky, K. Pertsch, S. Nair, A. Balakrishna, S. Dasari, S. Karamcheti, S. Nasiriany, M. K. Srirama, L. Y . Chen, K. Ellis, et al. Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12945, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Q. Bu, J. Cai, L. Chen, X. Cui, Y . Ding, S. Feng, S. Gao, X. He, X. Hu, X. Huang, et al. Agibot world colosseo: A large-scale manipulation platform for scalable and intelligent embodied systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06669, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. Luo, C. Xu, J. Wu, and S. Levine. Precise and dexterous robotic manipulation via human-in- the-loop reinforcement learning.Science Robotics, 10(105):eads5033, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Wagenmaker, M

    A. Wagenmaker, M. Nakamoto, Y . Zhang, S. Park, W. Yagoub, A. Nagabandi, A. Gupta, and S. Levine. Steering your diffusion policy with latent space reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15799, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ankile, Z

    L. Ankile, Z. Jiang, R. Duan, G. Shi, P. Abbeel, and A. Nagabandi. Residual off-policy rl for finetuning behavior cloning policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19301, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Zheng, J

    J. Zheng, J. Li, D. Liu, Y . Zheng, Z. Wang, Z. Ou, Y . Liu, J. Liu, Y .-Q. Zhang, and X. Zhan. Universal actions for enhanced embodied foundation models. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 22508–22519, 2025. 9

    2025

  8. [16]

    Y . Yao, S. Liu, H. Song, D. Qu, Q. Chen, Y . Ding, B. Zhao, Z. Wang, X. Li, and D. Wang. Think small, act big: Primitive prompt learning for lifelong robot manipulation. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 22573–22583, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    W. Mao, W. Zhong, Z. Jiang, D. Fang, Z. Zhang, Z. Lan, H. Li, F. Jia, T. Wang, H. Fan, et al. Robomatrix: A skill-centric hierarchical framework for scalable robot task planning and execution in open-world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00171, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    H. Shi, B. Xie, Y . Liu, L. Sun, F. Liu, T. Wang, E. Zhou, H. Fan, X. Zhang, and G. Huang. Mem- oryvla: Perceptual-cognitive memory in vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19236, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. Koo, D. Choi, T. Kim, K. Lee, C. Kim, Y . Seo, and J. Shin. Hamlet: Switch your vision- language-action model into a history-aware policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.00695, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Zitkovich, T

    B. Zitkovich, T. Yu, S. Xu, P. Xu, T. Xiao, F. Xia, J. Wu, P. Wohlhart, S. Welker, A. Wahid, et al. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 2165–2183. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Black, N

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, et al. π0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Y . Ze, G. Zhang, K. Zhang, C. Hu, M. Wang, and H. Xu. 3d diffusion policy: Generalizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03954, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Y . Ze, Z. Chen, W. Wang, T. Chen, X. He, Y . Yuan, X. B. Peng, and J. Wu. Generalizable humanoid manipulation with 3d diffusion policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10803, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Y . Lu, Y . Tian, Z. Yuan, X. Wang, P. Hua, Z. Xue, and H. Xu. H 3 DP: Triply-hierarchical diffusion policy for visuomotor learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07819, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    H. R. Walke, K. Black, T. Z. Zhao, Q. Vuong, C. Zheng, P. Hansen-Estruch, A. W. He, V . Myers, M. J. Kim, M. Du, et al. Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 1723–1736. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    P. Li, Y . Wu, Z. Xi, W. Li, Y . Huang, Z. Zhang, Y . Chen, J. Wang, S.-C. Zhu, T. Liu, et al. Controlvla: Few-shot object-centric adaptation for pre-trained vision-language-action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16211, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    D. Li, B. Peng, C. Li, N. Qiao, Q. Zheng, L. Sun, Y . Qin, B. Li, Y . Luan, B. Wu, et al. An atomic skill library construction method for data-efficient embodied manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15068, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Y . Fan, P. Ding, S. Bai, X. Tong, Y . Zhu, H. Lu, F. Dai, W. Zhao, Y . Liu, S. Huang, et al. Long- vla: Unleashing long-horizon capability of vision language action model for robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19958, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Huang, Z

    S. Huang, Z. Zhang, T. Liang, Y . Xu, Z. Kou, C. Lu, G. Xu, Z. Xue, and H. Xu. Mentor: Mixture-of-experts network with task-oriented perturbation for visual reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14972, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. Lei, H. Cai, Z. Cui, L. Tan, J. Hong, G. Hu, S. Zhu, Y . Wu, S. Jiang, G. Wang, et al. Robomemory: A brain-inspired multi-memory agentic framework for interactive environmental learning in physical embodied systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01415, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    R. Li, W. Guo, Z. Wu, C. Wang, H. Deng, Z. Weng, Y .-P. Tan, and Z. Wang. Map-vla: Memory- augmented prompting for vision-language-action model in robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09516, 2025. 10

    2025

  24. [32]

    G. Lan, K. Qu, R. Zurbrügg, C. Chen, C. E. Mower, H. Bou-Ammar, and M. Hutter. Experience is the best teacher: Grounding vlms for robotics through self-generated memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16713, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Y . Lei, S. Mao, S. Zhou, H. Zhang, X. Li, and P. Luo. Dynamic mixture of progressive parameter-efficient expert library for lifelong robot learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05985, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    B. Liu, Y . Zhu, C. Gao, Y . Feng, Q. Liu, Y . Zhu, and P. Stone. Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 44776–44791, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Prasad, K

    A. Prasad, K. Lin, J. Wu, L. Zhou, and J. Bohg. Consistency policy: Accelerated visuomotor policies via consistency distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07503, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. Li, Y . Cong, Y . Wang, H. Xia, S. Huang, Y . Zhang, N. Xu, and G. Dai. Step: Warm-started vi- suomotor policies with spatiotemporal consistency prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08245, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Z. Liu, Y . Gu, S. Zheng, Y . Fu, X. Xue, and Y .-G. Jiang. Trivla: A triple-system-based unified vision-language-action model with episodic world modeling for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01424, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Q. Li, Y . Liang, Z. Wang, L. Luo, X. Chen, M. Liao, F. Wei, Y . Deng, S. Xu, Y . Zhang, et al. Cogact: A foundational vision-language-action model for synergizing cognition and action in robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19650, 2024. 11 A Extended Implementation ...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.