Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Spinning Particle Dynamics and Observational Redshift around an Asymptotically Flat Symmergent Black Hole

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the sign of the boson-fermion imbalance in symmergent gravity is written into the spatial pattern of photon redshift around a black hole: smooth for fermion-dominated spectra, oscillatory for boson-dominated ones.

desk verdict A careful, well-caveated application of standard particle-dynamics and redshift machinery to a symmergent black-hole exterior; the central smooth-vs-oscillatory distinction is internally sound, but the claim that this constrains nB-nF rests on an imported, untested premise. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06114 v1 pith:MRL6IAKN submitted 2026-08-06 gr-qc

Beyhan Puliçe , Ali Övgün This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1083D05 PACS 95.30.Sf04.70.-s97.60.Lf04.50.Kd
keywords symmergentgravityblackholesparticlecollisionsISCOspinningparticlesobservationalredshiftmodifiedboson-fermionimbalance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the asymptotically flat, variable-curvature branch of symmergent gravity leaves a distinctive, sign-dependent imprint on the motion of massive particles and on the redshift of photons emitted by circular orbits. Because the coefficient of the R² correction is set by the boson-fermion imbalance, the geometry is conformal to Schwarzschild through a radial mode whose large-distance form is either Yukawa-suppressed or oscillatory. The paper derives effective potentials, circular-orbit and ISCO conditions for neutral, charged, and spinning (Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon) particles, plus collision energies. It also proves an exact identity (1+z+)(1+z−) = 1/A(re) that lets the product of the two observed frequency shifts reconstruct the lapse at the emitter radius. If correct, the spatial pattern of that reconstruction—smooth for fermion-dominated spectra, oscillatory for boson-dominated spectra—would allow one to constrain the sign of the boson-fermion imbalance, although not its magnitude.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the radial conformal mode φ(r)=ε f(r) that maps the exterior geometry onto Schwarzschild, ds²=$e^{{−φ}}$(−Ψdt²+dr²/Ψ+r²dΩ²) to first order, with Ψ=1−2M/r. It obeys the linear equation (r²Ψφ′)′=γ r²φ, whose large-radius solutions are $e^{{−√γ r}}$/(√γ r) for γ>0 and cos(√|γ| r+δ)/(√|γ| r) for γ<0. This single mode carries the sign dichotomy into every observable, and the product identity (1+z+)(1+z−)=1/A(re) turns the two redshift branches into a direct measurement of the lapse. The numerical pipeline integrates this ODE inward from Cauchy data at large radius with explicit amplitude ε=0.05 and phase δ=0, filtering everything by |εf|≤0.1.

What would settle it

Measure both signed frequency shifts from the same circular emission ring around a black hole of known mass, form (1+z+)(1+z−)A(re) with A(re)=1−2M/re, and look at the radial pattern: monotonic positive deviation would match fermion domination, alternating sign would match boson domination, and no pattern would rule out the perturbative conformal exterior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the two signs of the symmergent parameter γ, which is inversely proportional to nB−nF, produce two qualitatively different black-hole exteriors: for γ>0 (fermion-dominated) the conformal deformation is a Yukawa-suppressed, short-ranged correction, while for γ<0 (boson-dominated) it is an oscillatory inverse-radius tail. All the derived observables—effective potentials, ISCO radii and angular momenta, center-of-mass collision energies, and photon frequency shifts—inherit this dichotomy. The sharpest single result is the model-independent product identity (1+z+)(1+z−)=1/A(re), which reconstructs the lapse function at the emission radius from the two signed branches of the frequency shift. The spatial form of the reconstructed lapse thus distinguishes the sign of nB−nF, but the magnitude remains degenerate with the deformation amplitude ε, the oscillatory phase δ, and the independently unknown mass and emitter radius.

Load-bearing premise

The identification γ = −64π/[3(nB−nF)] ties the sign of the quadratic-curvature coefficient to the particle spectrum; if particle content does not fix the R² coefficient in exactly this way, the claimed smooth-versus-oscillatory dichotomy does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For γ>0 (fermion-dominated spectrum), all derived quantities—effective potential, ISCO radius, collision energy, and frequency shifts—deviate smoothly and locally from Schwarzschild, with the largest effect at the inner edge.
  • For γ<0 (boson-dominated spectrum), the oscillatory tail creates alternating radial bands; circular orbits exist only in admissible intervals, and stability must be checked separately via the second derivative of the effective potential.
  • The identity (1+z+)(1+z−)=1/A(re) means that two measured shifts from one circular ring reconstruct the lapse; the fractional deviation from Schwarzschild is exactly e^{εf(re)}−1, so the sign pattern distinguishes the two branches.
  • Charged and spinning probes add independent handles: the Coulomb term tilts the potential and shifts the ISCO inward or outward with the sign of qQ, while spin-curvature coupling reorders the ISCO energy and angular-momentum thresholds differently in the two branches.
  • The magnitude of |nB−nF| cannot be extracted from frequency shifts alone; the amplitude ε, the phase δ (in the oscillatory branch), and independent knowledge of M and re are all required.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the product identity is not specific to symmergent gravity: any static, spherically symmetric metric with circular emitters and a static observer at infinity satisfies it, so the reconstruction method could serve as a general lapse-mapping tool for black-hole shadows and accretion rings.
  • If the γ<0 branch's alternating stable and unstable intervals were realized in nature, quasi-periodic oscillations in accretion-disk spectra might show radial banding; this is a testable extension the paper does not pursue.
  • The degeneracy between nB−nF and the boundary-condition amplitude suggests that combining these redshift measurements with independent shadow or lensing constraints, which are sensitive to the same ε, could break the degeneracy and turn a sign constraint into a magnitude constraint.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes timelike particle dynamics, collision energetics, and photon frequency shifts in a perturbative, asymptotically flat solution of symmergent gravity that is conformal to Schwarzschild at linear order. It derives radial equations and effective potentials for neutral, charged, and spinning (MPD–Tulczyjew) probes, computes ISCO and center-of-mass energy diagnostics, and derives the product identity (1+z_+)(1+z_-)=1/A(r_e) for photons emitted by circular geodesic sources. The authors show that the sign of the parameter gamma determines whether the conformal deformation is Yukawa-like or oscillatory, and they propose that the spatial pattern of a reconstructed lapse can constrain the sign of n_B - n_F. The analysis is consistently restricted to |epsilon f(r)| <= 0.1, with explicit filters and numerical checks.

Significance. This is a careful and internally consistent phenomenological study. It contains several useful results that are independent of the symmergent framework details, especially the redshift product identity and the exact simplification of the circular-orbit denominator to 2 e^{-2 epsilon f}(r - 3M). The numerical implementation is checked against the Schwarzschild limit and the product identity to machine precision, and the authors are unusually explicit about validity domains and degeneracies. However, the headline inference from the lapse pattern to the sign of n_B - n_F depends on the symmergent relation Eq. (2), which is imported from earlier work rather than derived or tested here, and the self-flagged horizon non-regularity for gamma > 0 weakens the black-hole interpretation. These issues are fixable but require revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.C; Eq. (2)] The central claim that the spatial form of the reconstructed lapse constrains the sign of n_B - n_F rests entirely on Eq. (2), gamma = -64 pi / [3(n_B - n_F)], which is imported from refs. [9-13] and is not derived or independently tested in this paper. The dichotomy between smooth and oscillatory patterns is a statement about the sign of gamma; translating it into a statement about the sign of n_B - n_F requires the assumed proportionality c_O = (n_B - n_F)/(128 pi^2). If that coefficient receives additional contributions or uses a different sign convention, the observable constrains gamma but not the particle content. Please either derive Eq. (2) within the paper or explicitly state that the particle-content interpretation is contingent on the external framework identification.
  2. [Section V; Eq. (6)] The Conclusion states that a nontrivial decaying gamma > 0 mode cannot be simultaneously regular at the Schwarzschild horizon under standard boundary assumptions, but no derivation of this statement appears in the body. Since Eq. (6) is singular at r = 2M and the spacetime is used only for r >= 6M in the numerical analysis, this is a load-bearing limitation for the 'black hole' label in the title and for any near-horizon interpretation of the Yukawa branch. Please supply the regularity analysis or explicitly relabel the setup as an exterior-patch model without horizon claims.
  3. [Section III.C; Eqs. (63)-(74)] The spinning-particle analysis defines circular orbits by p^r = 0 and marginal stability by d^2/dr^2 (p^r/m)^2 = 0, after correctly warning that p^mu/m is not the tangent four-velocity under the Tulczyjew spin supplementary condition. Since the physical radial velocity u^r is related to p^r by spin-dependent terms, the turning points and stability boundaries in the canonical-momentum space need not coincide with those of the physical center-of-mass trajectory. Please state explicitly whether the reported spinning-particle ISCOs are conditions on p^r or on the physical four-velocity, and, if the latter, provide the relation and estimate the difference at the displayed |s|/M values.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II] The symbols n_B and n_F are not explicitly defined as numbers of bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom at first use; please add a brief definition for clarity.
  2. [References] References [9] and [13] appear to be the same paper (same title, same journal and volume, same arXiv number); please merge or remove the duplicate.
  3. [Section IV.C] The reconstruction formula Eq. (105) is introduced with the assumption that M and r_e are known, but the conditions that the two shifts come from the same circular ring and that the emitter is equatorial are mentioned only later; moving these conditions next to Eq. (105) would improve clarity.
  4. [Various figures and text] There are several typographical and spacing issues, e.g., 'coefficient' appears as 'coefficent' through the text, 'Figure33displaysthephysicaldeformation' lacks spaces, Ref. [42] spells 'Tulzcyjew' instead of 'Tulczyjew', and the caption of Fig. 8 says 'the n_B - n_F branch' where it should say 'the n_B - n_F < 0 branch'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Yukawa/oscillatory distinction is derived from the sign of gamma in a linear ODE, with amplitude and phase treated as free; the imported nB-nF link and the product identity are stated as premises/checks, not as self-confirming predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained for the claims actually made. The central dichotomy (Yukawa vs oscillatory) follows from the sign of gamma in the linear ODE (6)-(13); the paper never fits gamma or the amplitude to the observables it 'predicts.' The particle-content link (2) is an imported theoretical premise from the symmergent literature (refs. [9-13]), not derived from the redshift or orbital data, so any failure of that premise would weaken the inference to nB-nF, but that is a correctness/assumption risk, not circularity. The lapse reconstruction (104)-(105) is a genuine identity, and the paper explicitly labels agreement with it as an internal implementation check, not independent validation. The amplitude epsilon and phase delta are declared free boundary-condition data, and the degeneracy of the reconstruction with epsilon, delta, M, and re is stated. The flagged horizon non-regularity of the gamma>0 mode is a domain limitation, not a circular step. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict; no fitted parameter is renamed a prediction; no load-bearing claim rests on a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims lean on the symmergent action and the conformal ansatz from prior work, plus boundary-condition data (epsilon, delta) that the paper explicitly leaves free. No new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • epsilon (deformation amplitude) = 0.05 (chosen for all numerics)
    Boundary-condition-dependent amplitude introduced in Eq. (4); sets the overall size of the conformal deformation. Quantitative predictions scale with it, and the paper cannot infer it from gamma.
  • delta (oscillatory phase) = 0 (chosen)
    Integration phase in the gamma < 0 branch, introduced in Eq. (13); set to zero for all numerics. Locations of oscillatory extrema and gaps depend on it.
  • Q (external electric field strength) = 0.5 M in illustrative plots
    Test-field strength for charged-particle dynamics; chosen by hand, not derived. Affects the charged-particle ISCO but not the central branch distinction.
  • s (spin per unit mass) = -0.5, 0, 0.5
    Spin parameter in MPD dynamics; chosen for illustration. Pole-dipole approximation requires |s|/M << 1, which the paper notes.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Symmergent effective action (Eq. 1) with the R^2 coefficient set by cO = (nB - nF)/(128 pi^2).
    Section II, Eqs. (1)-(2). The entire framework assumes gravity emerges with this quadratic correction tied to the particle spectrum.
  • domain assumption Linearized conformal exterior (Eq. 5) with phi satisfying (r^2 Psi phi')' = gamma r^2 phi (Eq. 6).
    Section II. The exterior is taken to be perturbatively conformal to Schwarzschild at first order in epsilon.
  • ad hoc to paper Decaying boundary conditions (Eq. 13) with delta = 0.
    Section II, after Eq. (13). The choice of the decaying mode and zero phase is a modeling choice; other modes or phases would change quantitative predictions.
  • standard math MPD equations with Tulczyjew SSC (Eqs. 46-49).
    Section III C. Standard equations of motion for spinning test particles in general relativity.
  • domain assumption Test electromagnetic field with no backreaction (Eq. 31, 45).
    Section III B. Charged particles move in an external Coulomb potential At = Q/r; the metric is not charged.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spinning Particle Dynamics and Observational Redshift around an Asymptotically Flat Symmergent Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MRL6IAKN

@misc{pith2026260806114,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spinning Particle Dynamics and Observational Redshift around an Asymptotically Flat Symmergent Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MRL6IAKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06114}
}
abstract

We investigate timelike particle dynamics, collision energetics, and photon frequency shifts in the perturbative variable-scalar curvature branch of asymptotically flat symmergent gravity. The low-energy vacuum action contains an $R^{2}$ correction whose coefficient is set by the boson--fermion imbalance of the underlying quantum field theory. At linear order, the exterior geometry is conformal to Schwarzschild spacetime through a radial mode satisfying a linear equation. We retain an independent boundary-condition-dependent amplitude and restrict the analysis to the perturbative domain. The two signs of the symmergent parameter $\gamma$ yield distinct profiles: $\gamma>0$ gives a Yukawa-suppressed deformation, whereas $\gamma<0$ produces an oscillatory inverse-radius deformation. We derive radial equations, effective potentials, circular-orbit and marginal-stability conditions for neutral, electrically charged, and spinning massive particles. Charged particles are treated in the test-field approximation, while spinning particles obey the Mathisson--Papapetrou--Dixon equations with the Tulczyjew condition. We also compute the center-of-mass energy of neutral-particle collisions and the frequency shifts of photons emitted tangentially by circular geodesic sources and detected by a static observer at infinity. The redshift and blueshift factors satisfy $(1+z_{+})(1+z_{-})=1/A(r_e)$, directly linking their product to the lapse function at emission. The $\gamma>0$ branch yields smooth, short-range deviations from Schwarzschild dynamics, whereas the $\gamma<0$ branch can generate oscillatory radial bands admitting circular-orbit solutions whose stability must be tested independently. These observables provide complementary probes of the variable-curvature sector, although their quantitative interpretation also depends on the deformation amplitude and, for the oscillatory branch, its phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06114 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. illustrates how the effective potential for neutral test particles responds to the sign and magnitude of the Symmergent parameters namely nB − nF . For nB − nF (γ > 0)(left panel) the deviation induced by the Symmergent sector is localized to the strong-field region and becomes rapidly suppressed as r/M increases, leading to a smooth, monotonic radial profile at large distances. For nB − nF (γ < 0)(right panel), the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. illustrates the radial velocity for representative values of the angular momentum. The condition r˙ ≥ 0 defines the kinematically accessible region, whereas r˙ = 0 marks a turning point. In the nB − nF < 0 (γ > 0) branch, the radial profile is smoothly deformed in the strong-field region. In the nB − nF > 0 (γ < 0) branch, the oscillatory conformal tail can introduce additional turning points. Every displayed point … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (36 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the center-of-mass energy of two neutral particles. A collision at a given radius is physical only if both particles can reach that radius, namely if R1(r) ≥ 0 and R2(r) ≥ 0. The signs σ1 and σ2 must also be specified because particles moving in the same radial d…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: quantifies how the innermost stable circular orbit responds to the strength Q of the external Coulomb-type test field at fixed charge-to-mass ratio q. The ISCO is determined by the stability condition imposed on top of the circularity constraints, so it is particularl…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: shows how the effective potential governing the radial motion of spinning test particles depends on the underlying Symmergent branch selected by the Bose-Fermi imbalance. In the present setup, spin enters through spin–curvature coupling (MPD dynamics with Tulczyjew SS…
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_28.png]
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: FIG. 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_30.png]
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: FIG. 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_31.png]
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: FIG. 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_32.png]
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: FIG. 33 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_33.png]
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: FIG. 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_34.png]
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: FIG. 35 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_35.png]
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: FIG. 36 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_36.png]
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: FIG. 37 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_37.png]
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: FIG. 38 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_38.png]
Figure 39
Figure 39. Figure 39: FIG. 39 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_39.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    While a spinless particle follows the usual geodesic equations, the presence of intrinsic spin leads to non-geodesic dynamics due to spin–curvature coupling

    Equations of motion of spinning particles In this section, we briefly review the theoretical framework for the motion of spinning test particles in the gravita- tional field of compact objects. While a spinless particle follows the usual geodesic equations, the presence of intrinsic spin leads to non-geodesic dynamics due to spin–curvature coupling. The m...

    work page

  2. [2]

    For simplicity, we restrict the motion to the equatorial plane,θ = π/2

    Effective potential for spinning particles’ motion Our goal is to construct the effective potential governing a spinning test particle in the spacetime of asymptotically flat symmergent black-hole exterior. For simplicity, we restrict the motion to the equatorial plane,θ = π/2. In a static, spherically symmetric background, the dynamics admits two conserv...

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring,

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring,”Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L5 (2019), arXiv:1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,”Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Shadow of rotating non-Kerr black hole,

    Farruh Atamurotov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and Bobomurat Ahmedov, “Shadow of rotating non-Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 064004 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Optical properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: shadow,

    Farruh Atamurotov and Bobomurat Ahmedov, “Optical properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: shadow,”Phys. Rev. D 92, 084005 (2015), arXiv:1507.08131 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Shadow of rotating regular black holes,

    Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Muhammed Amir, Bobomurat Ahmedov, and Sushant G. Ghosh, “Shadow of rotating regular black holes,”Phys. Rev. D 93, 104004 (2016), arXiv:1604.03809 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Magnetically charged black holes from non- linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope,

    Alireza Allahyari, Mohsen Khodadi, Sunny Vagnozzi, and David F. Mota, “Magnetically charged black holes from non- linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope,”JCAP 02, 003 (2020), arXiv:1912.08231 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Hunting for extra dimensions in the shadow of M87*,

    Sunny Vagnozzi and Luca Visinelli, “Hunting for extra dimensions in the shadow of M87*,”Phys. Rev. D 100, 024020 (2019), arXiv:1905.12421 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A,

    Sunny Vagnozzi et al., “Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A,”Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Emergent Gravity as the Eraser of Anomalous Gauge Boson Masses, and QFT-GR Concord,

    Durmus Demir, “Emergent Gravity as the Eraser of Anomalous Gauge Boson Masses, and QFT-GR Concord,”Gen. Rel. Grav. 53, 22 (2021), arXiv:2101.12391 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Symmergent Gravity, Seesawic New Physics, and their Experimental Signatures,

    Durmus Demir, “Symmergent Gravity, Seesawic New Physics, and their Experimental Signatures,”Adv. High Energy Phys. 2019, 4652048 (2019), arXiv:1901.07244 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Curvature-Restored Gauge Invariance and Ultraviolet Naturalness,

    Durmus Ali Demir, “Curvature-Restored Gauge Invariance and Ultraviolet Naturalness,”Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 6727805 (2016), arXiv:1605.00377 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Gauge and Poincaré properties of the UV cutoff and UV completion in quantum field theory,

    Durmus Demir, “Gauge and Poincaré properties of the UV cutoff and UV completion in quantum field theory,”Phys. Rev. D 107, 105014 (2023), arXiv:2305.01671 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Asymptotically-Flat Black Hole Solutions in Symmer- gent Gravity,

    Beyhan Puliçe, Reggie C. Pantig, Ali Övgün, and Durmuş Demir, “Asymptotically-Flat Black Hole Solutions in Symmer- gent Gravity,”Fortsch. Phys. 72, 2300138 (2024), arXiv:2403.02373 [gr-qc]

    2024

  8. [17]

    Black hole shadow in symmergent gravity,

    İrfan Çimdiker, Durmuş Demir, and Ali Övgün, “Black hole shadow in symmergent gravity,”Phys. Dark Univ. 34, 100900 (2021), arXiv:2110.11904 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Quasiperiodic os- cillations, weak field lensing and shadow cast around black holes in Symmergent gravity,

    Javlon Rayimbaev, Reggie C. Pantig, Ali Övgün, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and Durmuş Demir, “Quasiperiodic os- cillations, weak field lensing and shadow cast around black holes in Symmergent gravity,”Annals of Physics (2023), 10.1016/j.aop.2023.169335, arXiv:2206.06599 [gr-qc]

    2023

  10. [19]

    Testing symmergent gravity through the shadow image and weak field photon deflection by a rotating black hole using the M87∗ and Sgr. A∗ results,

    Reggie C. Pantig, Ali Övgün, and Durmuş Demir, “Testing symmergent gravity through the shadow image and weak field photon deflection by a rotating black hole using the M87∗ and Sgr. A∗ results,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 250 (2023), arXiv:2208.02969 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Thermodynamics and logarithmic corrections of symmergent black holes,

    Riasat Ali and Rimsha Babar and Zunaira Akhtar and Ali Övgün, “Thermodynamics and logarithmic corrections of symmergent black holes,”Results in Physics , 106300 (2023)

    2023

  12. [21]

    Thin accretion disk images of the black hole in symmergent gravity,

    İlim İrfan Çimdiker, Ali Övgün, and Durmuş Demir, “Thin accretion disk images of the black hole in symmergent gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 184001 (2023), arXiv:2308.03947 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Constraints on charged symmergent black hole from shadow and lensing,

    Beyhan Puliçe, Reggie C. Pantig, Ali Övgün, and Durmuş Demir, “Constraints on charged symmergent black hole from shadow and lensing,”Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 195003 (2023), arXiv:2308.08415 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Spinning test particles in theγ spacetime,

    Bobir Toshmatov and Daniele Malafarina, “Spinning test particles in theγ spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 104052 (2019), arXiv:1910.11565 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Spinning test particle motion around a traversable wormhole,

    Carlos A. Benavides-Gallego, Wen-Biao Han, Daniele Malafarina, Bobomurat Ahmedov, and Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, “Spinning test particle motion around a traversable wormhole,”Phys. Rev. D 104, 084024 (2021), arXiv:2107.07998 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Spinning magnetized particles orbiting magnetized Schwarzschild black holes,

    Farrux Abdulxamidov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and Zdeněk Stuchlík, “Spinning magnetized particles orbiting magnetized Schwarzschild black holes,”Phys. Rev. D 108, 044030 (2023), arXiv:2308.05392 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Collisions and circular motion of spinning-charged particle around magnetized black holes in modified gravity,

    Tursinbay Oteev, Javlon Rayimbaev, Bobomurat Ahmedov, Inomjon Ibragimov, Murodbek Vapayev, and Sokhibjan Muminov, “Collisions and circular motion of spinning-charged particle around magnetized black holes in modified gravity,” Phys. Dark Univ. 50, 102118 (2025)

    2025

  18. [27]

    Spinning particle motion and MCMC analysis of S2 star orbiting Sgr A∗,

    Uktamjon Uktamov, Bakhtiyor Narzilloev, Ibrar Hussain, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and Bobomurat Ahmedov, “Spinning particle motion and MCMC analysis of S2 star orbiting Sgr A∗,” Phys. Dark Univ. 49, 102022 (2025)

    2025

  19. [28]

    Dy- namics of spinning particles around the loop quantum black hole,

    Gulnisa Abdukayumova, Farruh Atamurotov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Phongpichit Channuie, and G. Mustafa, “Dy- namics of spinning particles around the loop quantum black hole,”Nucl. Phys. B 1024, 117353 (2026)

    2026

  20. [29]

    Dynamics of spinning particles around static black holes in effective quantum gravity,

    Dilmurod Umarov, Farruh Atamurotov, Sushant G. Ghosh, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and G. Mustafa, “Dynamics of spinning particles around static black holes in effective quantum gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 800 (2025). 39

    2025

  21. [30]

    Dy- namics of spinning particles around the Reissner-Nordstrom-like black hole,

    Gulnisa Abdukayumova, Farruh Atamurotov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Phongpichit Channuie, and G. Mustafa, “Dy- namics of spinning particles around the Reissner-Nordstrom-like black hole,”Nucl. Phys. B 1019, 117121 (2025)

    2025

  22. [31]

    Spinning particle motion around charged decoupled hairy black hole,

    Gulzoda Rakhimova, Farruh Atamurotov, Nozima Juraeva, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and G. Mustafa, “Spinning particle motion around charged decoupled hairy black hole,”Phys. Dark Univ. 47, 101721 (2025)

    2025

  23. [32]

    Spinning particle motion around asymptotically safe gravity exhibiting regular black holes,

    Sojida Mannobova, Farruh Atamurotov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Badr S. Alkahtani, and G. Mustafa, “Spinning particle motion around asymptotically safe gravity exhibiting regular black holes,”Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 586 (2025)

    2025

  24. [33]

    Spinning particles as probes of quartic square-root Horndeski gravity: spin–curvature coupling and orbital dynamics,

    Ziyodulla Turakhonov, Tolibjon Ibrokhimov, Farruh Atamurotov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Ahdab K. Althukair, and Euaggelos E. Zotos, “Spinning particles as probes of quartic square-root Horndeski gravity: spin–curvature coupling and orbital dynamics,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus 141, 629 (2026)

    2026

  25. [34]

    Particle motion and epicyclic frequencies in the einstein special unitary matrices sigma model of black holes,

    Abdelmalek Bouzenada, Imtiaz Khan, Asifa Ashraf, Emre Demir, Ertan Güdekli, Ikhtiyor Saidov, and Farruh Atamurotov, “Particle motion and epicyclic frequencies in the einstein special unitary matrices sigma model of black holes,”Phys. Dark Univ. 51, 102216 (2026)

    2026

  26. [35]

    Epicyclic frequencies around charged regular black hole: constraints using different quasars data,

    G. Mustafa, Faisal Javed, Sushant G. Ghosh, S. K. Maurya, and Farruh Atamurotov, “Epicyclic frequencies around charged regular black hole: constraints using different quasars data,”Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 6 (2026)

    2026

  27. [36]

    Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation,

    James M. Bardeen, William H. Press, and Saul A Teukolsky, “Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation,”Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1972)

    1972

  28. [37]

    The Optical Appearance of a Star Orbiting an Extreme Kerr Black Hole,

    C. T. Cunningham and James M. Bardeen, “The Optical Appearance of a Star Orbiting an Extreme Kerr Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. 183, 237–264 (1973)

    1973

  29. [38]

    The effects of redshifts and focusing on the spectrum of an accretion disk around a Kerr black hole,

    C. T. Cunningham, “The effects of redshifts and focusing on the spectrum of an accretion disk around a Kerr black hole,” Astrophys. J. 202, 788–802 (1975)

    1975

  30. [39]

    Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk,

    J. P. Luminet, “Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk,” Astron. Astrophys. 75, 228–235 (1979)

    1979

  31. [40]

    Observational redshift from general spheri- cally symmetric black holes,

    Diego A. Martinez-Valera, Mehrab Momennia, and Alfredo Herrera-Aguilar, “Observational redshift from general spheri- cally symmetric black holes,”Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 288 (2024), arXiv:2311.17993 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Beyond Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetimes: III. A perturbative vacuo with non-constant scalar cur- vature in R + R2 gravity,

    Hoang Ky Nguyen, “Beyond Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetimes: III. A perturbative vacuo with non-constant scalar cur- vature in R + R2 gravity,” (2022), arXiv:2211.07380 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Neue mechanik materieller systemes,

    Myron Mathisson, “Neue mechanik materieller systemes,” Acta Phys. Polon. 6, 163–2900 (1937)

    1937

  34. [43]

    Spinning test particles in general relativity. 1

    Achille Papapetrou, “Spinning test particles in general relativity. 1.”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 209, 248–258 (1951)

    1951

  35. [44]

    Motion of multipole particles in general relativity theory binaries,

    B. Tulzcyjew, “Motion of multipole particles in general relativity theory binaries,” Acta Phys. Polon. 18, 393 (1959)

    1959

  36. [45]

    Gravitational waves from a spinning particle plunging into a Kerr black hole,

    Motoyuki Saijo, Kei-Ichi Maeda, Masaru Shibata, and Yasushi Mino, “Gravitational waves from a spinning particle plunging into a Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998)

    1998

  37. [46]

    On the Physical significance of the Riemann tensor,

    F. A. E. Pirani, “On the Physical significance of the Riemann tensor,”Acta Phys. Polon. 15, 389–405 (1956)

    1956

  38. [47]

    Redshift spectroscopy as a probe of regular black holes, black bounces, and scalar-hair compact objects,

    Ali Övgün, Reggie C. Pantig, and Joel Saavedra, “Redshift spectroscopy as a probe of regular black holes, black bounces, and scalar-hair compact objects,”Phys. Dark Univ. 53, 102392 (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.