Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 133 references

Calculations of the Krypton Phase Diagram and Novel Plasticity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts an entropically stabilized body-centred cubic phase in krypton above about 36 GPa and 2630 K, and argues that the experimental speckle-disappearance line near 50 GPa marks this fcc-to-bcc transition rather than melting.

desk verdict A multi-method phase diagram for a krypton pair potential with a novel bcc prediction, undermined as written by a 10 eV/atom enthalpy inconsistency and an overreaching speckle reinterpretation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06118 v1 pith:YALKVVPV submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords kryptonphasediagrambody-centredcubicmeltingcurvespecklemethodmachine-learnedinteratomicpotentialmoleculardynamicsgreedysnakedefects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using a two-body potential fitted only to coupled-cluster dimer and trimer energies, the paper maps the full phase diagram of krypton and finds an entropically stabilised body-centred cubic (bcc) phase along the melt curve. The bcc phase appears above a fcc–bcc–liquid triple point at about 36 GPa and 2630 K, where it has higher enthalpy but higher entropy than face-centred cubic. The paper argues that the anomaly in laser-speckle melting experiments near 50 GPa, where krypton seems to melt at lower temperatures than extrapolation predicts, is actually the fcc-to-bcc transition, because highly mobile 'greedy snake' defects can alter the surface speckle pattern without melting. If correct, this replaces the accepted reading of those experiments with a concrete prediction that x-ray diffraction can test. It also shows that a simple two-body potential fitted to accurate dimer/trimer data can outperform a more flexible machine-learned model that was not trained on krypton physics.

What carries the argument

The technical engine is the Clapeyron slope field $C(T,P)$, a generalisation of the Clausius–Clapeyron relation that evaluates $dT/dP = T\Delta v/\Delta h$ at every pressure and temperature from paired single-phase molecular-dynamics runs, reducing to the usual coexistence slope wherever $\Delta G=0$. Its field lines trace phase boundaries from a known anchor; here the anchor is the fcc–bcc–liquid triple point, and the bcc–fcc boundary is verified independently by absolute free-energy calculations. The other load-bearing element is the Tadah!Kr3b potential itself, a machine-optimised two-body form with one screened-Coulomb term and seven Gaussian functions, fitted to CCSD(T) dimer and trimer data, whose short-range repulsion is softer than Lennard–Jones and is identified as the cause of bcc stability.

What would settle it

A laser-heated diamond-anvil-cell experiment on krypton between 35 and 60 GPa using x-ray diffraction as the diagnostic would settle it: if no bcc reflections appear and the speckle-disappearance line coincides with the onset of liquid diffuse scattering, the proposed bcc field and the reinterpretation of the melt anomaly are wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Tadah!Kr3b two-body potential, fitted to CCSD(T) dimer and trimer data, produces a krypton phase diagram with fcc, hcp, bcc, liquid, and gas regions, and that the bcc region is real physics rather than a fitting artifact. The bcc field is entropically stabilised along the melt curve above the fcc/bcc/liquid triple point at approximately 36 GPa and 2630 K: at fixed pressure and temperature near the melt, bcc has a higher enthalpy than fcc but enough extra entropy from vibrational motion to lower its Gibbs free energy. Because bcc is more plastic than fcc, especially through correlated chains of atom jumps called greedy snakes, the paper argues that the laser-speckle disappearance line observed experimentally at about 50 GPa is not the melting curve but the fcc–bcc boundary. The same potential also predicts two low-temperature hcp pockets, and the paper traces the bcc stabilisation to the potential's softer short-range repulsion compared with Lennard–Jones. A comparison with a foundation MACE model, which predicts unphysically compact tetrahedral clusters, supports the authors' point that physical form and appropriate training matter more than model flexibility.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on assuming that a two-body potential fitted only to dimer and trimer energies correctly captures how the Gibbs free energies of fcc and bcc krypton differ at 36 GPa and 2600 K, a condition the paper's own melt-curve comparison does not directly test.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above about 36 GPa and 2630 K, the stable solid against melting is bcc, not fcc, and the fcc–bcc coexistence line extends metastably into the liquid region.
  • The laser-speckle 'melting' anomaly near 50 GPa should be read as an fcc–bcc transition, so the true krypton melt curve is steeper than speckle experiments suggest.
  • The bcc phase's greedy-snake defects provide a plasticity mechanism that can change surface morphology rapidly, which explains why a surface-sensitive speckle diagnostic could mistake a solid–solid transition for melting.
  • Krypton's bcc field is caused by a softer short-range repulsion than Lennard–Jones supplies, suggesting that accurate two-body fits can capture phase behaviour that simple generic potentials miss.
  • The fcc–hcp enthalpy differences are below 0.1 meV per atom, so entropy and zero-point motion decide the low-temperature stacking; fcc wins because it has higher entropy, closing the hcp pockets with temperature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bcc field is real, the same speckle-based reinterpretation should be examined for argon and xenon, whose melting curves show similar flattening anomalies and whose pair potentials are close relatives of the krypton one.
  • The greedy-snake mechanism may be a general feature of bcc phases near melting in van der Waals solids, implying that their high-temperature plastic flow is governed by correlated chain jumps rather than single-atom diffusion.
  • A direct test of the soft-repulsion hypothesis would be to compute the same phase diagram with pair potentials fitted to CCSD(T) data for argon and xenon: if all three develop bcc fields, the phenomenon is generic to accurate rare-gas two-body potentials.
  • The paper's MACE comparison suggests that foundation machine-learned models should be benchmarked on phase diagrams, not just forces and energies, before being used for high-pressure predictions in systems outside their training domain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper computes a pressure-temperature phase diagram for krypton using the Tadah!Kr3b two-body potential, which is fitted to CCSD(T) dimer and trimer energies. The authors combine direct two-phase coexistence simulations for the fcc and bcc melt lines, a newly introduced 'Clapeyron slope field' to trace the fcc-bcc boundary from a computed triple point, Gibbs-Helmholtz integration, static and quasiharmonic calculations for low-temperature fcc-hcp boundaries, slab coexistence for the liquid-gas line, and Frenkel-Ladd free-energy integrations as an independent check. The principal findings are: (i) an entropically stabilized bcc phase appears above a fcc/bcc/liquid triple point at approximately 36 GPa and 2630 K; (ii) two narrow hcp pockets are present at low temperature; (iii) the bcc phase exhibits 'greedy snake' collective diffusion events; and (iv) on the basis of these results, the experimental laser-speckle melting anomaly near 50 GPa is reinterpreted as the fcc-bcc transition rather than the melt curve. A comparison with the MACE foundation model concludes that more flexible machine-learned potentials are not automatically more reliable.

Significance. The paper is technically impressive. The use of multiple independent methods (coexistence, Gibbs-Helmholtz, Clapeyron field, Frenkel-Ladd, quasiharmonic) to cross-check each boundary sets a high standard. The Clapeyron slope field is a useful methodological idea, and the uncertainty estimates from Monte Carlo resampling are a strength. The prediction of a bcc field is concrete and falsifiable: it can be tested by x-ray diffraction melting experiments or by direct free-energy calculations with many-body potentials or DFT. The reinterpretation of the speckle anomaly, if confirmed, would resolve a long-standing discrepancy. However, the physical significance of the predictions rests on the transferability of a potential fitted to two- and three-atom clusters, which the paper itself acknowledges is not directly established at the extreme conditions where bcc is predicted. The manuscript also contains an obvious numerical inconsistency in §3.5 that must be fixed before the results can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.5] At 110 GPa and 3983 K, the paper reports a bcc enthalpy of 14.898 eV/atom and an fcc enthalpy of 4.862 eV/atom, and then states that the bcc phase is stable. These numbers are mutually incompatible: the 10.036 eV/atom enthalpy penalty would require an entropy difference of roughly 28 k_B per atom at 3983 K to stabilize bcc, which is physically implausible and inconsistent with the claimed free-energy results. This is almost certainly a typographical error (the bcc value was likely intended to be 4.898 eV/atom, making the enthalpy difference 0.036 eV/atom), but as written it directly contradicts the central phase-stability claim. The authors must correct the numbers and re-state the enthalpy difference, and they should verify that the corrected values are consistent with the Frenkel-Ladd and Clapeyron-field results.
  2. [§3.1 and §4] Section 3.1 states that 'At high pressures the computed melt curve rises much more steeply than the laser-heated diamond-anvil-cell measurements, which flatten above about 30 GPa,' while the Conclusion states that 'Our calculated melt curve tracks the experiment well up to 50 GPa.' These statements cannot both be true. The behavior of the model melt curve relative to experiment is central to the paper's reinterpretation of the speckle anomaly, so the authors must reconcile this contradiction and specify quantitatively where and by how much the model and experiment diverge.
  3. [§3.5 and §4] The claim that the experimental speckle-disappearance line 'should be interpreted as the fcc–bcc transition' goes beyond what the simulations demonstrate. The simulations show bulk 'greedy snake' events in bcc Kr at specific (P,T) conditions, but no simulation of surface roughness or of the speckle pattern itself is presented. To make this reinterpretation credible, the authors should either perform a direct simulation of surface morphology evolution under the relevant conditions, or soften the language to 'may be' and clearly label the reinterpretation as a hypothesis.
  4. [§2.2 and §3.1] The bcc field is presented as a prediction for real krypton, but the Tadah!Kr3b potential is fitted only to dimer and trimer CCSD(T) data. The Frenkel-Ladd and Clapeyron-field checks verify internal consistency of the potential, not its accuracy against real krypton. The melt-curve comparison in §3.1 shows that the potential deviates from experiment at high pressures, which is a direct warning that the potential may not be reliable in the regime where bcc is predicted. To support the physical prediction, the authors should provide additional validation of the potential under extreme conditions, for example by comparing its room-temperature equation of state with the experimental data of Rosa et al. (Ref. 4) or by computing the fcc-bcc enthalpy difference with an independent many-body method (e.g., a DFT-D or a different ML potential). Without such a test, the bcc prediction should be framed explicitly as a property of the model, not of krypton.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The word 'hexahonal' should be 'hexagonal'.
  2. [§3.5] The word 'Mechaniism' should be 'mechanism'.
  3. [§3.5] The angle brackets in '¡111¿' should be typeset as '<111>'.
  4. [§2.4] The phrase 'In extremis' is used incorrectly; consider 'in the extreme case' or similar.
  5. [§3.6.1] The sentence beginning 'MACE is trained on neither krypton nor explicit physical constraints' is clear, but the following sentence is grammatically awkward; consider rewording.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the potential is fitted only to CCSD(T) dimer/trimer data, and all phase-diagram claims are emergent simulation results not used in the fit.

full rationale

The central claim is not circular. The Tadah!Kr3b potential is fitted only to CCSD(T) dimer/trimer data from Jäger et al. (ref. 16), plus ZBL repulsion at ultrashort range; no condensed-phase or phase-diagram property is used in the fit. The fcc/bcc/liquid triple point that anchors the fcc–bcc line is computed by crossing two independent direct-coexistence melting branches, not taken from experiment. The bcc field is an emergent simulation result, checked by Frenkel–Ladd free-energy integration (same potential, different methodology), and the reinterpretation of the ~50 GPa speckle anomaly as the fcc–bcc boundary is a posterior hypothesis, used neither to fit the potential nor to place the anchor. Self-citations (refs. 14, 28, and methodological references) are not load-bearing: ref. 14 is the original potential fit anchored in external coupled-cluster data, and ref. 28 is a companion study. The obvious numerical oddity in §3.5—'at 110GPa/3983K we find a bcc enthalpy of 14.898 eV/atom and fcc as 4.862 eV/atom'—is a consistency/transferability red flag, and the paper's own melt-curve comparison shows the potential overestimates melting temperature and rises more steeply than experiment, but those are correctness concerns, not circularity. The derivation does not reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim of bcc stability depends entirely on the Tadah!Kr3b potential being an accurate model of krypton at extreme conditions, together with standard statistical mechanics methods. No free parameters are fitted to the target result; the potential was previously published. The MACE comparison uses a model not trained on krypton, so it is a test of transferability, not a fitted input.

free parameters (1)
  • Tadah!Kr3b potential weights and hyperparameters = Not re-fitted here (published in ref 14)
    Input model fitted to CCSD(T) dimer/trimer data; the predicted phase diagram is entirely determined by this potential.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Tadah!Kr3b potential accurately represents krypton interactions at high pressure and temperature
    Fitted to CCSD(T) dimer/trimer data; condensed-phase behavior is an extrapolation. Invoked throughout, especially Sections 2.2, 3.1, and 3.5.
  • domain assumption Classical dynamics with Nose-Hoover thermostats and barostats samples equilibrium phases adequately
    NPT/NPH MD runs of up to 2 ns assumed to converge the relevant free energies; no quantum nuclear effects except zero-point in the fcc-hcp quasiharmonic treatment.
  • domain assumption Quasiharmonic approximation for fcc-hcp free energy differences
    Section 2.7; anharmonic corrections are assumed to cancel between the two stackings.
  • domain assumption Frenkel-Ladd free energy integration is reliable for fcc and bcc solids
    Section 2.8; the paper notes the Einstein crystal reference becomes ill-conditioned close to melting, so verification of the bcc field near the melt is a potential concern.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Calculations of the Krypton Phase Diagram and Novel Plasticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YALKVVPV

@misc{pith2026260806118,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Calculations of the Krypton Phase Diagram and Novel Plasticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YALKVVPV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06118}
}
read the original abstract

The phase diagram for Kr, as represented by the Tadah! two-body potential is shown to have face-centred cubic (fcc), hexahonal close packed (hcp), and body centred cubic (bcc) regions. It has been assembled by combining several methods: direct liquid--solid coexistence for the melt lines, Gibbs--Helmholtz integration and Clapeyron slopes for the bcc--fcc line, slab coexistence for the liquid--gas line, static zero-temperature relaxations for the crystals, and the quasiharmonic approximation for the low-temperature fcc--hcp windows. The bcc phase contains highly mobile ``greedy snake" defects, which suggests a reinterpretation of the melt-curve data: the anomaly observed may be due to the speckle method detecting the bcc-fcc boundary, not the melt curve. While pair potentials have limitations, comparison with a foundation MACE model shows that a more flexible machine-learned model does not necessarily improve matters if inappropriately trained.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06118 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Dimer potential-well region. The final training data set combines the original [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Clapeyron slope field of the fcc–bcc region of the phase diagram (Fig. 4). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. bcc–liquid phase-coexistence simulation in LAMMPS. Common [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase diagram of the Tadah!Kr3b two-body potential. Melt lines are from two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Melting curves of the fcc (circles) and bcc (squares) phases from two-phase coex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: AJ fractions 41 for representative high-T, high-P fcc- and bcc-tagged runs as a function of averaging window. Final configuration snapshots look mixed, with a preference for fcc in both fcc and bcc cells. However, the 5 ps–10 ps averaged configurations clearly indicate…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Low-temperature solid–solid phase diagram of the Tadah!Kr3b potential from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Results from two-phase gas–liquid NVT calculations using LAMMPS with 11,232 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustration of typical snake-like motion within bcc Kr. The thin grey lines show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Energies of various clusters on a symlog plot (linear below 1 meV): a linear short [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Lattice sum for a hexagonal close-packed structure and its dependence on the c/a ratio of the hexagonal cell parameters , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  2. [2]

    Phase diagram of softly repulsive systems: The

    Prestipino, Santi and Saija, Franz and Giaquinta, Paolo V , journal=. Phase diagram of softly repulsive systems: The. 2005 , publisher=

  3. [3]

    Journal of statistical physics , volume=

    On the validity of the inverse conjecture in classical density functional theory , author=. Journal of statistical physics , volume=. 1984 , publisher=

  4. [4]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    The inverse problem in classical statistical mechanics , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 1984 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    Physics Letters A , volume=

    A uniqueness theorem for fluid pair correlation functions , author=. Physics Letters A , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

  6. [6]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume=

    A note on the uniqueness result for the inverse Henderson problem , author=. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  7. [7]

    State-of-the-art

    J. State-of-the-art. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4943959 , url =

  8. [8]

    The journal of physical chemistry letters , volume=

    An accurate machine-learned potential for krypton under extreme conditions , author=. The journal of physical chemistry letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

Show all 133 references
  1. [9]

    2025 , publisher=

    Kirsz, Marcin and Daramola, Ayobami and Hermann, Andreas and Zong, Hongxiang and Ackland, Graeme J , journal=. 2025 , publisher=

  2. [10]

    ACS omega , volume=

    From atoms to colloids: Does the Frenkel line exist in discontinuous potentials? , author=. ACS omega , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  3. [11]

    Academic Press

    Rare gas solids , author=. Academic Press. , year=

  4. [12]

    1971 , publisher =

    Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties: A Handbook , author =. 1971 , publisher =

  5. [13]

    Every, A. G. and McCurdy, A. K. , editor =. Second and Higher Order Elastic Constants , booktitle =. 1992 , doi =

  6. [14]

    and Skalyo, Jr., J

    Petert, H. and Skalyo, Jr., J. and Grimm, H. and L. Elastic constants of solid krypton at. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , volume=. 1973 , publisher=

  7. [15]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Stacking characteristics of close packed materials , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2017 , doi=

  8. [16]

    2025 , publisher=

    Daramola, Ayobami and Ackland, Graeme J and Pruteanu, Ciprian G , journal=. 2025 , publisher=

  9. [17]

    and Parekh, Marissa N

    Daramola, Ayobami D. and Parekh, Marissa N. H. and Loveday, John S. and Proctor, John E. and Ackland, Graeme J. and Pruteanu, Ciprian G. , journal=. 2026 , publisher=

  10. [18]

    Krypton and the fundamental flaw of the

    Pruteanu, Ciprian G and Loveday, John S and Ackland, Graeme J and Proctor, John E , journal=. Krypton and the fundamental flaw of the. 2022 , publisher=

  11. [19]

    Phase behavior of the quantum

    Wiebe, Heather and Underwood, Tom L and Ackland, Graeme J , journal=. Phase behavior of the quantum. 2020 , publisher=

  12. [20]

    Frenkel, Daan and Ladd, Anthony J. C. , journal=. New. 1984 , doi=

  13. [21]

    The European Physical Journal B , volume=

    Nested sampling for materials , author=. The European Physical Journal B , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  14. [22]

    Physical Review , volume=

    Interstitials and vacancies in iron , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1964 , publisher=

  15. [23]

    Phase diagram of power law and

    Travesset, Alex , journal=. Phase diagram of power law and. 2014 , doi=

  16. [24]

    Exact lattice summations for

    Robles-Navarro, Andres and Cooper, Shaun and Buchheit, Andreas A and Busse, Jonathan K and Burrows, Antony and Smits, Odile and Schwerdtfeger, Peter , journal=. Exact lattice summations for. 2025 , publisher=

  17. [25]

    Karki, B. B. and Ackland, G. J. and Crain, J. , journal=. Elastic instabilities in crystals from

  18. [26]

    Philosophical Magazine A , volume=

    Semi-empirical calculation of solid surface tensions in body-centred cubic transition metals , author=. Philosophical Magazine A , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

  19. [27]

    and Song, Xueyu , title =

    Morris, James R. and Song, Xueyu , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2002 , doi =

  20. [28]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Applications of local crystal structure measures in experiment and simulation , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  21. [29]

    , title =

    Kofke, David A. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1993 , doi =

  22. [30]

    Belonoshko, A. B. and Arapan, Sergiu and Rosengren, Anders , journal=. An. 2011 , publisher=

  23. [31]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Molecular dynamics study of melting and fcc-bcc transitions in Xe , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  24. [32]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Molecular dynamics study of phase transitions in Xe , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  25. [33]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Triple fcc-bcc-liquid point on the Xe phase diagram determined by the N-phase method , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  26. [34]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Xenon melting: Density functional theory versus diamond anvil cell experiments , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  27. [35]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Model for diffusion at the microcanonical superheating limit from atomistic computer simulations , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  28. [36]

    Strongly non-

    Zepeda-Ruiz, Luis A and Rottler, J. Strongly non-. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

  29. [37]

    , title =

    Kofke, David A. , title =. Molecular Physics , year =

  30. [38]

    , title =

    Kofke, David A. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

  31. [39]

    Bruce, A. D. and Wilding, N. B. and Ackland, G. J. , journal=. Free Energy of Crystalline Solids: A Lattice-Switch. 1997 , doi=

  32. [40]

    Bruce, A. D. and Jackson, A. N. and Ackland, G. J. and Wilding, N. B. , journal=. Lattice-switch. 2000 , publisher=

  33. [41]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

    Orkoulas, George , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

  34. [42]

    Proceedings of the Physical Society , volume=

    Second-order elastic constants of a solid under stress , author=. Proceedings of the Physical Society , volume=

  35. [43]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Origin of the complex crystal structures of elements at intermediate pressure , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=

  36. [44]

    and McTague, J

    Alexander, Sh. and McTague, J. , journal=. Should all crystals be. 1978 , publisher=

  37. [45]

    , author=

    Empirical model-building and response surfaces. , author=. 1987 , publisher=

  38. [46]

    Direct Evaluation of Vapour-Liquid Equilibria by Molecular Dynamics using

    L. Direct Evaluation of Vapour-Liquid Equilibria by Molecular Dynamics using. Molecular Simulation , year =

  39. [47]

    Direct Evaluation of Solid--Liquid Equilibria by Molecular Dynamics Using

    L. Direct Evaluation of Solid--Liquid Equilibria by Molecular Dynamics Using. Molecular Simulation , year =

  40. [48]

    and Jackson, Howard E

    Landheer, D. and Jackson, Howard E. and McLaren, R. A. and Stoicheff, B. P. , title =. Physical Review B , year =

  41. [49]

    and Skalyo, J

    Petert, H. and Skalyo, J. and Grimm, H. and L. Elastic constants of solid krypton at. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , year =

  42. [50]

    and McTague, J

    Alexander, S. and McTague, J. , title =. Physical Review Letters , year =

  43. [51]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 , year =

    Batatia, Ilyes and Kov. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 , year =

  44. [52]

    , title =

    Harrison, Walter A. , title =

  45. [53]

    Solid State Physics , volume =

    Heine, Volker and Weaire, Denis , title =. Solid State Physics , volume =. 1970 , editor =

  46. [54]

    Ashcroft, N. W. , title =. Physics Letters , volume =. 1966 , doi =

  47. [55]

    From Hamiltonians to Phase Diagrams: The Electronic and Statistical-Mechanical Theory of sp-Bonded Metals and Alloys , series =

    Hafner, J. From Hamiltonians to Phase Diagrams: The Electronic and Statistical-Mechanical Theory of sp-Bonded Metals and Alloys , series =

  48. [56]

    Science , volume=

    Quantum and isotope effects in lithium metal , author=. Science , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  49. [57]

    High-pressure

    Shimizu, Hiroyasu and Kawajiri, Masashi and Kume, Tetsuji and Sasaki, Shigeo and Freiman, Yuri A and Tretyak, Sergey M , journal=. High-pressure. 2009 , publisher=

  50. [58]

    High Pressure Research , volume=

    Crystal structure transformations of rare-gas solids under pressure , author=. High Pressure Research , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  51. [59]

    The Kepler Conjecture: The Hales-Ferguson Proof , pages=

    Sphere packings, I , author=. The Kepler Conjecture: The Hales-Ferguson Proof , pages=. 2011 , publisher=

  52. [60]

    Minimizing lattice structures for

    B. Minimizing lattice structures for. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  53. [61]

    The crystal structure of bixbyite and the c-modification of the sesquioxides , author=

    8. The crystal structure of bixbyite and the c-modification of the sesquioxides , author=. Zeitschrift f. 1930 , publisher=

  54. [62]

    Nature materials , volume=

    Aluminium at terapascal pressures , author=. Nature materials , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  55. [63]

    Calculation of

    Nguyen, Van Hung and Trinh, Thi Hue and Nguyen, Ba Duc , journal=. Calculation of

  56. [64]

    Application of the

    Girifalco, Louis A and Weizer, Victor G , journal=. Application of the. 1959 , publisher=

  57. [65]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume=

    The stability of many-particle systems , author=. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume=. 1966 , publisher=

  58. [66]

    , journal=

    Cyrot-Lackmann, F. , journal=. Sur le calcul de la coh. 1968 , publisher=

  59. [67]

    Twenty five years of

    Ackland, Graeme J and Sutton, Adrian and Vitek, Vasek , journal=. Twenty five years of. 2009 , publisher=

  60. [68]

    Finnis, M. W. and Sinclair, J. E. , journal=. A simple empirical. 1984 , publisher=

  61. [69]

    Ackland, G. J. and Thetford, R. , journal=. An improved. 1987 , publisher=

  62. [70]

    Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics , volume=

    Validity of the second moment tight-binding model , author=. Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics , volume=

  63. [71]

    Rosa, A. D. and Garbarino, G. and Briggs, R. and Svitlyk, V. and Morard, Guillaume and Bouhifd, Mohamed Ali and Jacobs, J. and Irifune, T. and Mathon, O. and Pascarelli, S. , journal=. Effect of the. 2018 , publisher=

  64. [72]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=

    Probing the limitations of isotropic pair potentials to produce ground-state structural extremes via inverse statistical mechanics , author=. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=. 2013 , doi=

  65. [73]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Unusual ground states via monotonic convex pair potentials , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 2011 , doi=

  66. [74]

    Soft Matter , volume=

    Optimized monotonic convex pair potentials stabilize low-coordinated crystals , author=. Soft Matter , volume=. 2011 , doi=

  67. [75]

    Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials , volume=

    A general method for searching for homometric structures , author=. Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials , volume=. 2022 , doi=

  68. [76]

    Physical Review , volume =

    Patterson, Arthur Lindo , title =. Physical Review , volume =. 1944 , doi =

  69. [77]

    , title =

    Kirsz, Marcin and Ackland, Graeme J. , title =. 2026 , note =

  70. [78]

    and Aktulga, H

    Thompson, Aidan P. and Aktulga, H. Metin and Berger, Richard and Bolintineanu, Dan S. and Brown, W. Michael and Crozier, Paul S. and. Computer Physics Communications , volume =. 2022 , doi =

  71. [79]

    Batatia, Ilyes and Benner, Philipp and Chiang, Yuan and Elena, Alin M. and Kov. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry , journal =. 2025 , doi =

  72. [80]

    and Bruce, Alastair D

    Jackson, Andrew N. and Bruce, Alastair D. and Ackland, Graeme J. , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2002 , doi =

  73. [81]

    and Kofke, David A

    Schultz, Andrew J. and Kofke, David A. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2018 , doi =

  74. [82]

    , title =

    Schwerdtfeger, Peter and Wales, David J. , title =. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =. 2024 , doi =

  75. [83]

    and Biersack, Jochen P

    Ziegler, James F. and Biersack, Jochen P. and Littmark, Uffe , title =

  76. [84]

    Physical Review Materials , volume =

    Menon, Sarath and Lysogorskiy, Yury and Rogal, Jutta and Drautz, Ralf , title =. Physical Review Materials , volume =. 2021 , doi =

  77. [85]

    Computational Materials Science , volume =

    Freitas, Rodrigo and Asta, Mark and de Koning, Maurice , title =. Computational Materials Science , volume =. 2016 , doi =

  78. [86]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    de Koning, Maurice and Antonelli, Alex and Yip, Sidney , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2001 , doi =

  79. [87]

    and de Leeuw, S

    van 't Hof, A. and de Leeuw, S. W. and Peters, C. J. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2006 , doi =

  80. [88]

    and Torquato, Salvatore , title =

    Jiao, Yang and Stillinger, Frank H. and Torquato, Salvatore , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2010 , doi =

  81. [89]

    , title =

    Rosenblatt, Joseph and Seymour, Paul D. , title =. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods , volume =. 1982 , doi =

  82. [90]

    , title =

    Crawford, Jenness and Torquato, Salvatore and Stillinger, Frank H. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2003 , doi =

  83. [91]

    and Speer, Eugene R

    Kuna, Tobias and Lebowitz, Joel L. and Speer, Eugene R. , title =. Journal of Statistical Physics , volume =. 2007 , doi =

  84. [92]

    Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , volume =

    Ennola, Veikko , title =. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , volume =. 1964 , doi =

  85. [93]

    and Young, David A

    Hoover, William G. and Young, David A. and Grover, Richard , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1972 , doi =

  86. [94]

    and Haymet, A

    Laird, Brian B. and Haymet, A. D. J. , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1992 , doi =

  87. [95]

    , title =

    Agrawal, Rupal and Kofke, David A. , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1995 , doi =

  88. [96]

    Bolhuis, P. G. and Frenkel, D. and Mau, Siun-Choun and Huse, David A. , title =. Nature , volume =. 1997 , doi =

  89. [97]

    , title =

    Prestipino, Santi and Saija, Franz and Giaquinta, Paolo V. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2005 , doi =

  90. [98]

    Local Optimality of Cubic Lattices for Interaction Energies , journal =

    B. Local Optimality of Cubic Lattices for Interaction Energies , journal =. 2019 , doi =

  91. [99]

    High Melting Points of Tantalum in a Laser-Heated Diamond Anvil Cell , journal =

    Dewaele, Agn. High Melting Points of Tantalum in a Laser-Heated Diamond Anvil Cell , journal =. 2010 , doi =

  92. [100]

    High-Pressure Melting Curves of Argon, Krypton, and Xenon: Deviation from Corresponding States Theory , journal =

    Boehler, Reinhard and Ross, Marvin and S. High-Pressure Melting Curves of Argon, Krypton, and Xenon: Deviation from Corresponding States Theory , journal =. 2001 , doi =

  93. [101]

    Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , pages=

    Melting criteria and imaging spectroradiometry in laser-heated diamond-cell experiments [and discussion comment] , author=. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , pages=. 1996 , publisher=

  94. [102]

    and Prins, C

    Michels, A. and Prins, C. , title =. Physica , volume =. 1962 , doi =

  95. [103]

    Crawford, R. K. and Daniels, W. B. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1971 , doi =

  96. [104]

    Physics Reports , volume =

    Pelissetto, Andrea and Vicari, Ettore , title =. Physics Reports , volume =. 2002 , doi =

  97. [105]

    and Span, Roland , title =

    Lemmon, Eric W. and Span, Roland , title =. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data , volume =. 2006 , doi =

  98. [106]

    Science and Technology of Advanced Materials: Methods , volume =

    Togo, Atsushi and Shinohara, Kohei and Tanaka, Isao , title =. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials: Methods , volume =. 2024 , doi =

  99. [107]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Huang, Kun , title =. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , volume =. 1950 , doi =

  100. [108]

    and Baskes, M

    Daw, Murray S. and Baskes, M. I. , title =. Physical Review B , volume =. 1984 , doi =

  101. [109]

    Physics Reports , volume =

    Kraftmakher, Yaakov , title =. Physics Reports , volume =. 1998 , doi =

  102. [110]

    Vacancies in Metals: From First-Principles Calculations to Experimental Data , journal =

    Carling, Karin and Wahnstr. Vacancies in Metals: From First-Principles Calculations to Experimental Data , journal =. 2000 , doi =

  103. [111]

    and Hennig, D

    Methfessel, M. and Hennig, D. and Scheffler, M. , title =. Applied Physics A: Solids and Surfaces , volume =. 1992 , doi =

  104. [112]

    Cousins, C. S. G. , title =. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics , volume =. 1971 , doi =

  105. [113]

    , title =

    MacDonald, Rosemary A. , title =. Physical Review B , volume =. 1972 , doi =

  106. [114]

    The Physics of Metals, Volume 1: Electrons , editor =

    Friedel, Jacques , title =. The Physics of Metals, Volume 1: Electrons , editor =

  107. [115]

    Ducastelle, Fran. Modules. Journal de Physique , volume =. 1970 , doi =

  108. [116]

    Robertson, I. J. and Payne, M. C. and Heine, V. , title =. Europhysics Letters , volume =. 1991 , doi =

  109. [117]

    Heine, Volker and Robertson, I. J. and Payne, Michael Christopher , title =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume =. 1991 , doi =

  110. [118]

    Physics Letters A , volume=

    Equation of state and metallization in compressed solid krypton , author=. Physics Letters A , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

  111. [119]

    Ackland, G. J. and Warren, M. C. and Clark, S. J. , journal=. Practical methods in

  112. [120]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Multiscale modeling of crowdion and vacancy defects in body-centered-cubic transition metals , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  113. [121]

    and Horsfield, A

    Nguyen-Manh, D. and Horsfield, A. P. and Dudarev, S. L. , journal=. Self-interstitial atom defects in. 2006 , publisher=

  114. [122]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume =

    Burrows, Antony and Cooper, Shaun and Pahl, Elke and Schwerdtfeger, Peter , title =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume =. 2020 , doi =

  115. [123]

    , title =

    Foldy, Leslie L. , title =. Physical Review B , volume =. 1978 , doi =

  116. [124]

    Cross-twinning model of

    van de Waal, Benjamin W , journal=. Cross-twinning model of. 1996 , publisher=

  117. [125]

    Journal of Crystal Growth , volume=

    Growth and crystal structures of solid xenon and krypton , author=. Journal of Crystal Growth , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

  118. [126]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Efficiency of core-level interatomic Coulombic decay in rare-gas dimers , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  119. [127]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Atomistic simulation of shear in a martensitic twinned microstructure , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  120. [128]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    New many-body potential for the bond order , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

  121. [129]

    Mathematische Annalen , volume =

    Epstein, Paul , title =. Mathematische Annalen , volume =. 1903 , doi =

  122. [130]

    Three-dimensional lattice ground states for

    B. Three-dimensional lattice ground states for. Studies in Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  123. [131]

    , title =

    Terras, Audrey A. , title =. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume =. 1973 , doi =

  124. [132]

    and Glasser, M

    Borwein, Jonathan M. and Glasser, M. Lawrence and McPhedran, Ross C. and Wan, James G. and Zucker, I. John , title =

  125. [133]

    Annalen der Physik , volume =

    Ewald, Paul Peter , title =. Annalen der Physik , volume =. 1921 , doi =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.