Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 105 references

EmoWorld: A Decoupled Affective Field for Controllable Emotional Video Generation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read EmoWorld claims that the emotional feel of generated video can be controlled without retraining: global atmosphere, localized affect-bearing cues, and temporal progression are steered at three separate points in a frozen video diffusion…

desk verdict The central VAS result is likely confounded: the paper's own Eq. 11 contradicts the claimed matched-prompt comparison, so the 19% gain needs re-evaluation before the headline claim is trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06231 v1 pith:5LXF6BXD submitted 2026-08-06 cs.CV

Bingyuan Wang , Baistan Zhyldyzbekov , Kunyu Feng , Zeyu Wang This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords emotionalvideogenerationactivationsteeringdiffusiontransformerflowmatchingtraining-freecontrolgreat-circleinterpolationaffectivecomputingtext-to-video
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

EmoWorld tries to establish that the emotional feel of a generated video can be controlled without retraining the generator, by separating "how a place feels" into three factors that act at different scales: scene-wide atmosphere, localized affect-bearing cues such as rain or withered vegetation, and emotional change over time. To obtain the directions it steers along, the framework runs a one-time preparation pass on geometry-preserving neutral and emotion-edited panoramas, extracting per-emotion steering vectors from the frozen video model's hidden states and a text cue library from a vision-language model. At inference, three operators inject these factors at three separate points of the computation. On Wan2.2 the framework reports that atmosphere steering raises target-emotion alignment by 19 percent while cutting a temporal-fluctuation proxy by 48 percent, semantic steering raises alignment by 37 percent and detected affect cues by 36 percent, and temporal steering lifts transition monotonicity from 0.687 to 0.788. If the claim holds, creators gain training-free, scene-preserving emotional direction for text-to-video and image-to-video generation across twenty-seven emotion categories.

What carries the argument

The central object is the decoupled affective field: a one-time-recorded collection of per-emotion, per-layer steering vectors plus a language-space affective cue library, indexed by task and retrieved at inference. The supporting principle is support-matching — each affective factor is represented on the support it acts on: layer-wise hidden states for atmosphere, sparse prompt-velocity residual coordinates for semantic cues, and frame-wise velocity fields for temporal progression. The load-bearing mechanism for transitions is GSlerp, great-circle interpolation between normalized endpoint residual directions on the unit hypersphere with separate linear interpolation of their magnitudes; it exists to prevent the norm shrinkage and cancellation that linear chord interpolation suffers when endpoint directions differ.

What would settle it

Compute the per-scene steering vectors $d_{e,l}$ from the 649 panorama pairs individually instead of pooling them: if the cross-scene variance is comparable to or larger than the separation between emotions, the averaged direction is not a clean, scene-invariant affect direction. In parallel, measure depth-map or edge consistency between neutral and edited panoramas; a large degradation would show the "geometry-preserving" edits are not geometry-preserving, breaking the assumption that the steering vector carries only affect. A third check: apply a Wan-extracted vector to CogVideoX without re-extraction and see whether CLIP-Emo moves; if it does not, the portability claim is limited to re-extracted vectors rather than general.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that within one frozen flow-matching video DiT, global atmosphere, affect-bearing semantic content, and temporal affect progression live at different computational scales and can be steered independently at those scales. Visual Atmosphere Steering (VAS) broadcasts a normalized, emotion- and layer-specific steering vector — the averaged hidden-state difference between emotionally edited and neutral panoramas — into selected hidden states, shifting lighting, color, and mood scene-wide. Semantic Affective Steering (SAS) separates the velocity-prediction difference caused by an emotion-augmented prompt into a per-frame spatially constant part and a zero-mean part, then keeps only the largest-magnitude fraction $\rho$ of coordinates as a sparse, independently scalable correction for localized cues. Temporal Affective Steering (TAS) treats the start and end emotions as endpoint residual fields over the (denoising step, video frame) domain and interpolates their normalized directions along a great circle on the unit hypersphere, with magnitudes interpolated separately, producing a smooth affective progression that is generated rather than blended afterward. EmoWorld asserts these operators work across 27 emotion categories in both text-to-video and image-to-video settings, transfer to other Video-DiT backbones, and compose with camera-conditioned control — all without updating generator parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Qwen-Image-Edit's neutral-to-emotion edits change only the affect while preserving scene geometry, identity, and viewpoint, and that averaging the resulting feature differences over 649 panoramas yields a scene-invariant steering direction that transfers to video latents and to other video backbones; the paper does not quantitatively verify the geometry preservation or the scene-invariance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One frozen Wan2.2 generator serves base generation, atmosphere steering, cue-enhanced prompting, transitions, and camera-conditioned composition, so emotional control adds no training, adapter, or per-emotion checkpoint.
  • VAS improves T2V target-emotion alignment by 19 percent (CLIP-Emo from 0.168 to 0.200) while lowering the temporal-fluctuation proxy from 1.22 to 0.63, indicating atmosphere steering both strengthens affect and steadies frames on the evaluated prompts.
  • In the cue-matched comparison, SAS raises whole-frame alignment by 37 percent and detected affect-bearing cues from 2.57 to 3.50 per frame, showing semantic strength can be scaled independently of global atmosphere.
  • TAS raises transition monotonicity to 0.788 in T2V (versus 0.687 for the strongest baseline) and from -0.325 to 0.421 in I2V, meaning smooth emotion progression is achievable without post-generation blending or per-frame prompting.
  • The same extraction-injection recipe instantiates on CogVideoX and VMem with backbone-specific probes and composes with prescribed camera paths, supporting portability beyond the Wan backbone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The support-matching recipe is not emotion-specific: any composite video control that mixes a global appearance factor, localized content, and temporal evolution (for example, weather plus decorations plus a storm-front transition) could be factorized the same way in a frozen model, which is a directly testable extension of the paper's stated principle.
  • Because the steering vectors are extracted from static panoramas, the same vectors should steer a frozen image DiT to give training-free image-atmosphere control; the video-specific machinery (frame schedules, TAS) is an add-on, predicting a concrete cross-modal transfer result the paper does not run.
  • The factorial result that GSlerp improves endpoint arrival and path linearity under both endpoint constructions while monotonicity depends on the endpoint field suggests the optimal transition recipe pairs a specific endpoint construction with a specific interpolation geometry; testing all four conditions across more emotion pairs and scenes would reveal whether one combination wins generally.
  • Everything downstream inherits the assumption that the neutral-to-edited panorama pair is a pure affect change; if the edit model perturbs geometry or texture, the steering vector silently mixes affect with unrelated image change, so measuring per-scene direction variance is the natural stress test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. EmoWorld proposes a training-free framework for emotional control of frozen video diffusion transformers, decomposing affect into global atmosphere, semantic cues, and temporal progression. It constructs emotion-specific steering vectors and a language-space cue library from paired neutral/emotion-edited panoramas. At inference, VAS injects layer-wise steering into hidden states, SAS sparsifies and scales the prompt-velocity residual, and TAS interpolates endpoint residual fields via great-circle interpolation over denoising and frame coordinates. The paper reports improved target-emotion alignment, semantic-cue presence, and transition monotonicity over baselines on Wan2.2, with portability to CogVideoX and VMem, plus a human perceptual study.

Significance. If the central comparison is matched, the framework is a solid training-free contribution: it keeps the generator frozen, provides three complementary operators that can be composed, and ships a reproducible evaluation protocol with measured inference cost, a participant-level human study with Holm-adjusted p-values, and cross-backbone demonstrations. The decoupling of atmosphere, semantic cues, and temporal progression is a useful conceptual organization for controllable video generation, and the great-circle interpolation for transition residuals is a sensible design choice supported by a matched LERP/GSlerp ablation. The main reservation is that the headline VAS result currently rests on an ambiguous prompt-matching definition, and the per-emotion calibration of steering strength weakens the aggregate claim until it is fully disclosed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3 (Visual Atmosphere Steering), Eq. (11), Figure 2, Table 1] The headline VAS comparison is internally inconsistent. Eq. (11) with λ_sem = 0 gives v̂ = v∅ + w(v_b^VAS − v∅), i.e., VAS applied to the base scene prompt p_b, not to the cue-augmented prompt p_e. Figure 2 labels v_base as AC−/VAS− and shows the final assembly v_base + ω r_atm + s(τ) r_sem, confirming that the formal operator contains no v_e^VAS pass. Yet Table 1 and its caption claim that 'Prompt-only and Prompt+VAS use identical cue-library-composed prompts.' If the implementation uses v_e^VAS, then Eq. (11) and Figure 2 omit the required forward pass; if it uses v_b^VAS, then the comparison changes both the prompt and the steering simultaneously, and the reported 19% CLIP-Emo gain cannot be attributed to VAS. The same ambiguity affects the human VAS study (Table 11) because its two arms inherit the same prompt difference. Please clarify with equations and code, and either correct the formal definition or rerun the matched comparison.
  2. [§4 (Comparative Results), Table 13, Figure 9] The headline T2V gain is achieved with per-emotion calibrated steering strength ('T2V: calibrated strength' in Figure 9), while the I2V evaluation uses a fixed global strength and shows a much smaller gain (0.162→0.171 in Table 1). This means the 19% improvement is not a single-parameter result but depends on tuning one strength value per emotion category. The paper does not specify the calibration procedure, the number of categories used for tuning, or the variance of the resulting gains. Please report the calibration protocol, the selected strengths, and the T2V result under a fixed strength, so readers can judge how much of the aggregate gain comes from per-emotion tuning.
  3. [Tables 1, 2, 3 and supplementary Section C] The main quantitative claims (CLIP-Emo gains, temporal-fluctuation reduction, monotonicity values) are reported as point estimates without error bars or significance tests. The TAS evaluation is small (27 T2V and 18 I2V videos), and the macro-averages in Table 1 aggregate over 27 categories with per-emotion calibration. The supplementary provides participant-level bootstrap CIs for the human study, but not for the automatic metrics that carry the paper's central claims. Please add bootstrap or other interval estimates for the headline numbers, and state whether the differences in Tables 1 and 2 are significant under a paired or hierarchical resampling scheme.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'WepresentEmoWorld' should be 'We present EmoWorld.'
  2. [§3 (Visual Atmosphere Steering)] The sentence defining Prompt+VAS as 'the matched condition that applies the same library-composed emotion-augmented prompt as Prompt-only while enabling VAS' should be aligned with Eq. (11) and Figure 2; as written, it contradicts the formal assembly.
  3. [Supplementary Table 7] The factorial TAS test set uses a different evaluator ('updated compute_metrics_v3.py') than the multi-pair interpolation ablation in Table 6, and the footnote correctly warns that absolute values are not comparable. This is awkward but transparent; consider presenting both in a single consistent metric definition in the final version.
  4. [§4 (Experimental Settings)] The main text states that VAS strength is 0.18 for T2V and 0.15 for I2V, but Figure 9 later refers to per-emotion calibrated strength for T2V. Please reconcile these statements early in the paper, since the current presentation is confusing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the learned steering vectors are evaluated with external metrics and matched comparisons, so no claimed prediction reduces to its own inputs by construction.

full rationale

EmoWorld builds its VAS, SAS, and TAS operators from paired neutral and emotion-edited panoramas, but the evaluation does not define the reported gains in terms of those same constructions. VAS vectors (Eq. 3-4) are extracted by averaging feature differences and then injected into hidden states (Eq. 7); the reported CLIP-Emo, EI, and human-preference metrics are external to this extraction, so an improvement is not tautological. The SAS comparison is explicitly cue-matched: 'we compare Cue+VAS with Cue+VAS+SAS using the same cue-augmented prompt, initialization, seed, VAS strength, and sampling settings,' which prevents the cue wording itself from explaining the gain. TAS is benchmarked against EFM and Prompt2Progression with separate interpolation and endpoint ablations, again using external trajectory metrics. The self-citations (EmoSpace, the authors' survey, MagicScroll) appear in related-work context and are not load-bearing for any derivation. One reporting inconsistency exists: Eq. 11's four-pass assembly defines r_atm from the base prompt, while Table 1's caption says 'Prompt-only and Prompt+VAS use identical cue-library-composed prompts.' If the implementation follows Eq. 11 literally, the VAS comparison changes both prompt and steering at once, which would be an evaluation-matching concern rather than a circular derivation, since neither condition's score is defined by the other. No step in the paper reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a definitional identity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim relies on several empirically chosen control strengths and on assumptions about edit geometry preservation, scene-invariant steering, and the validity of CLIP-Emo as an emotion metric. These are disclosed but not all independently verified.

free parameters (6)
  • VAS strength = 0.18 (T2V), 0.15 (I2V), 0.22 (TAS); per-emotion calibrated in T2V full benchmark
    Gain for injecting steering vectors; value chosen by authors, calibrated per emotion in the full T2V benchmark to balance CLIP-Emo and DINO-SC.
  • SAS retention ratio rho = 0.20
    Top-p fraction of residual coordinates retained in Eq. 10; selected by authors.
  • SAS semantic strength lambda_sem = 5.0
    Scaling of the sparse semantic residual in Eq. 11; chosen.
  • TAS transition profile = beta_min=0.1, beta_max=0.9, sharpness=3.0, t_mid=F/2
    Shapes the temporal coordinate field; user-specified narrative profile.
  • CFG scale w = 5.0
    Standard for Wan; chosen for all experiments.
  • Cue retrieval choice = not specified
    The Retrieve function for selecting scene-compatible cues is not defined; the number and choice of cues are effectively free.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Qwen-Image-Edit emotion edits preserve scene geometry and identity
    The method assumes feature differences between neutral and edited panoramas isolate affect rather than content shift; not quantitatively verified.
  • domain assumption Steering vectors are scene-invariant and transfer to video latents and other backbones
    Directions averaged over 649 panoramas are assumed to transfer to new scenes and to video latents, including across backbones.
  • domain assumption CLIP-Emo cosine similarity is a valid measure of target-emotion alignment
    The primary metric assumes cosine similarity between CLIP frame embeddings and emotion-word text embeddings corresponds to perceived emotion.
  • domain assumption Velocity fields can be linearly decomposed, thresholded, and interpolated while remaining valid generative directions
    SAS and TAS assume the flow ODE is approximately linear in conditioning, so residuals can be added and spherically interpolated.
  • standard math Standard classifier-free guidance equations for flow matching apply
    Used without derivation in Eq. 17 of the supplementary.
invented entities (1)
  • Decoupled affective field
    purpose: Conceptual representation of emotion control as separate atmosphere, semantic-cue, and temporal components
    Introduced as an organizing concept for VAS, SAS, and TAS; not a directly measurable physical quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EmoWorld: A Decoupled Affective Field for Controllable Emotional Video Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5LXF6BXD

@misc{pith2026260806231,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EmoWorld: A Decoupled Affective Field for Controllable Emotional Video Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5LXF6BXD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06231}
}
read the original abstract

Emotion shapes how viewers interpret a scene, yet existing video generators entangle global atmosphere, affect-bearing semantic cues, and temporal progression within a single text condition. We present EmoWorld, a framework that decouples these factors within a frozen flow-matching video diffusion transformer (Video DiT). A one-time preparation stage extracts layer-specific affect directions and a reusable cue library from geometry-preserving neutral and emotion-edited panoramas. At inference, Visual Atmosphere Steering (VAS) injects atmosphere directions into hidden states, Semantic Affective Steering (SAS) isolates a separately scalable prompt residual for semantic cues, and Temporal Affective Steering (TAS) interpolates endpoint residual fields across denoising and video time. On Wan2.2, VAS improves target-emotion alignment by 19% while reducing a temporal-fluctuation proxy by 48%; SAS improves target-emotion alignment by 37% and increases detected affect-bearing cues by 36%; and TAS improves transition monotonicity by 15% over the strongest baseline. EmoWorld is evaluated across 27 emotion categories in text-to-video and image-to-video settings, demonstrates portability across multiple Video-DiT backbones, and supports camera-conditioned composition without updating generator parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06231 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. EmoWorld capabilities. Text-to-video and image-to-video atmosphere control, semantic cue control, camera￾conditioned generation, and temporal emotion transitions. raises CLIP-Emo from 0.168 to 0.200 while reducing the temporal-fluctuation proxy from 1.22 to 0.63. In the cue￾matched SAS evaluation, adding SAS to Cue+VAS raises CLIP-Emo from 0.155 to 0.212 and increases the mean num￾ber of detected affect-bearing cues… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. EmoWorld overview. (a) Geometry-preserving neutral and edited panorama pairs yield feature-space VAS vectors and a language-space affective cue library. (b) During inference, VAS, SAS, and TAS act on hidden states, prediction residuals, and frame-wise velocity fields, respectively, within a shared frozen Video DiT. lighting, color temperature, contrast, saturation, and related atmosphere cues. Localized semantic cue… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. T2V atmosphere comparison across selected affective categories. Prompt-only and Prompt+VAS use identical cue-library-composed prompts and matched generation settings. Task Method CLIP-Emo ↑ EI ↑ EQI ↑ TF ↓ T2V atmosphere control (shared cross-system subset) No steering 0.154 -0.068 0.024 0.93 Prompt-only 0.168 -0.049 0.029 1.22 RAVE (Kara et al. 2024) 0.166 -0.055 0.032 5.15 FlowDirector (Li et al. 2026) 0.141 -0.04… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: I2V atmosphere comparison across selected emotion categories. Given the same reference image and cue-composed prompt, Prompt+VAS strengthens the target atmosphere while preserving the reference scene. Semantic cue control. To isolate SAS from cue wording, we compare Cu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative ablations of VAS and SAS. VAS es￾tablishes the global visual atmosphere through block-level steering, whereas SAS modulates affect-bearing semantic cues through the sparse prompt-residual branch. Their com￾bination provides complementary control [PITH_FULL…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative ablation of TAS. Compared with a static start field and linear endpoint mixing, TAS interpolates endpoint residual directions across video frames to produce a clearer affective progression. 5 Discussion and Conclusion We have presented EmoWorld, which decom…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Frame-wise affect-transition trajectories. Target-emotion CLIP scores across four representative transitions. TAS shows clear directional progression on the more challenging joy-to-horror and calmness-to-horror transitions, while trajectory shape and endpoint behavior …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Semantic cue evaluation for SAS. Grounding DINO measures the fraction of frames containing requested affect￾bearing concepts. Cue+VAS and Cue+VAS+SAS use identical cue prompts and generation settings; their observed mean cue-presence rates are 60.7% and 68.9%, respecti…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Category-wise VAS gains across the complete 27-emotion taxonomy. Bars show ∆CLIP-Emo relative to Prompt￾only under the calibrated T2V and fixed-strength I2V protocols. The distributions complement the macro-aggregated evaluation by revealing category-dependent response…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Alignment–preservation analysis on the complete 27-emotion benchmark. Each point represents one evaluated emotion–scene instance, and large markers show macro averages with standard-deviation error bars. T2V uses per-emotion calibrated steering strength (DINO-SC 0.983…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cross-backbone qualitative portability. Backbone-specific VAS vectors instantiate the same extraction–injection principle on Wan2.2-5B, CogVideoX-5B, and VMem across matched scene and affect conditions. The columns show no steering and VAS steering toward joy or horro…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Curated qualitative gallery. Representative T2V and I2V atmosphere-control examples are organized by scene and labeled with target emotion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Curated qualitative gallery. Temporal-transition and camera-conditioned examples show ordered RGB frames along the generated affect and viewpoint trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2503.20314 , archivePrefix=

    Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models , author=. 2503.20314 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

  3. [3]

    2412.20404 , archivePrefix=

    Open-Sora: Democratizing Efficient Video Production for All , author=. 2412.20404 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , series=

    VideoPoet: A Large Language Model for Zero-Shot Video Generation , author=. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , series=. 2024 , url=

    2024

  5. [5]

    2412.03603 , archivePrefix=

    HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Models , author=. 2412.03603 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  7. [7]

    2305.13077 , archivePrefix=

    ControlVideo: Training-free Controllable Text-to-Video Generation , author=. 2305.13077 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Papers , pages=

    MotionCtrl: A Unified and Flexible Motion Controller for Video Generation , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Papers , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  2. [10]

    2310.01405 , archivePrefix=

    Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency , author=. 2310.01405 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    2308.10248 , archivePrefix=

    Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering , author=. 2308.10248 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition , author=. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  5. [13]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Self-Report Captures 27 Distinct Categories of Emotion Bridged by Continuous Gradients , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2017 , doi=

    2017

  6. [14]

    2025 , doi=

    Lin, Shaoqing and Teng, Chong and Li, Fei and Ji, Donghong and Qu, Lizhen and Li, Zhuang , booktitle=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  7. [15]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    Automatic 3D Indoor Scene Modeling from Single Panorama , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2018 , doi=

    2018

  8. [16]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Text2Room: Extracting Textured 3D Meshes from 2D Text-to-Image Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  9. [17]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    LucidDreamer: Towards High-Fidelity Text-to-3D Generation via Interval Score Matching , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  10. [18]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    WonderJourney: Going from Anywhere to Everywhere , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  11. [19]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    WonderWorld: Interactive 3D Scene Generation from a Single Image , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  12. [20]

    Taming Stable Diffusion for Text to 360

    Zhang, Cheng and Wu, Qianyi and Gambardella, Camilo Cruz and Huang, Xiaoshui and Phung, Dinh and Ouyang, Wanli and Cai, Jianfei , booktitle=. Taming Stable Diffusion for Text to 360. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  13. [21]

    PanoWan: Lifting Diffusion Video Generation Models to 360

    Xia, Yifei and Weng, Shuchen and Yang, Siqi and Liu, Jingqi and Zhu, Chengxuan and Teng, Minggui and Jia, Zijian and Jiang, Han and Shi, Boxin , eprint=. PanoWan: Lifting Diffusion Video Generation Models to 360

  14. [22]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    DreamCube: RGB-D Panorama Generation via Multi-Plane Synchronization , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  15. [23]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , volume=

    HoloDreamer: Holistic 3D Panoramic Scene Generation From Text Descriptions , author=. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  16. [24]

    European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages=

    DreamScene360: Unconstrained Text-to-3D Scene Generation with Panoramic Gaussian Splatting , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  17. [25]

    ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Paper Track , pages=

    LayerPano3D: Layered 3D Panorama for Hyper-Immersive Scene Generation , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Paper Track , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  18. [26]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) , pages=

    PanoDreamer: Consistent Text to 360-Degree Scene Generation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  19. [27]

    2508.08086 , archivePrefix=

    Matrix-3D: Omnidirectional Explorable 3D World Generation , author=. 2508.08086 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    3D Scene Graph: A Structure for Unified Semantics, 3D Space, and Camera , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  21. [29]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    DeepPanoContext: Panoramic 3D Scene Understanding with Holistic Scene Context Graph and Relation-based Optimization , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  22. [30]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Controllable 3D Outdoor Scene Generation via Scene Graphs , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  23. [31]

    2601.19433 , archivePrefix=

    RoamScene3D: Immersive Text-to-3D Scene Generation via Adaptive Object-aware Roaming , author=. 2601.19433 , archivePrefix=

  24. [32]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    EmoGen: Emotional Image Content Generation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  25. [33]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    EmotiCrafter: Text-to-Emotional-Image Generation based on Valence-Arousal Model , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  26. [34]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Make Me Happier: Evoking Emotions Through Image Diffusion Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  27. [35]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    EmoEdit: Evoking Emotions through Image Manipulation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  28. [36]

    The Era of Interactive Media , publisher=

    Image Re-emotionalizing , author=. The Era of Interactive Media , publisher=. 2012 , doi=

    2012

  29. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , volume=

    EmoAgent: A Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse Affective Image Manipulation , author=. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  30. [38]

    2508.03535 , archivePrefix=

    CoEmoGen: Towards Semantically-Coherent and Scalable Emotional Image Content Generation , author=. 2508.03535 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

    UniEmo: Unifying Emotional Understanding and Generation with Learnable Expert Queries , author=. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  32. [40]

    2603.09286 , archivePrefix=

    CogBlender: Towards Continuous Cognitive Intervention in Text-to-Image Generation , author=. 2603.09286 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    2602.11658 , archivePrefix=

    EmoSpace: Fine-Grained Emotion Prototype Learning for Immersive Affective Content Generation , author=. 2602.11658 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    DimensionX: Create Any 3D and 4D Scenes from a Single Image with Decoupled Video Diffusion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  35. [43]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    VMem: Consistent Interactive Video Scene Generation with Surfel-Indexed View Memory , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  36. [44]

    1812.01717 , archivePrefix=

    Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challenges , author=. 1812.01717 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    From Prompt to Progression: Taming Video Diffusion Models for Seamless Attribute Transition , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  38. [46]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    TempoControl: Temporal Attention Guidance for Text-to-Video Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  39. [47]

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , volume=

    A Circumplex Model of Affect , author=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , volume=. 1980 , doi=

    1980

  40. [48]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    FreeU: Free Lunch in Diffusion U-Net , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  41. [49]

    Pattern Recognition , volume=

    FreeStyle: Free Lunch for Text-guided Style Transfer using Diffusion Models , author=. Pattern Recognition , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  42. [50]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    Weight Space Representation Learning via Neural Field Adaptation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  43. [51]

    2024 , url=

    Unveiling the Secret of AdaLN-Zero in Diffusion Transformer , author=. 2024 , url=

    2024

  44. [52]

    2412.07750 , archivePrefix=

    Motion by Queries: Identity-Motion Trade-offs in Text-to-Video Generation , author=. 2412.07750 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Computer Vision and Image Understanding , volume=

    Style Transfer with Diffusion Models for Synthetic-to-Real Domain Adaptation , author=. Computer Vision and Image Understanding , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  46. [54]

    2508.02324 , archivePrefix=

    Qwen-Image Technical Report , author=. 2508.02324 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Transactions on Machine Learning Research , year=

    Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timoth. Transactions on Machine Learning Research , year=. 2304.07193 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning , series=

    Learning Transferable Visual Models from Natural Language Supervision , author=. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning , series=. 2021 , url=

    2021

  49. [57]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  50. [58]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    T2I-Adapter: Learning Adapters to Dig Out More Controllable Ability for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  51. [59]

    2604.09213 , archivePrefix=

    SHIFT: Steering Hidden Intermediates in Flow Transformers , author=. 2604.09213 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    2026 , month=

    Power Steering: Behavior Steering via Layer-to-Layer Jacobian Singular Vectors , author=. 2026 , month=

    2026

  53. [61]

    2603.09313 , archivePrefix=

    Curveball Steering: The Right Direction To Steer Isn't Always Linear , author=. 2603.09313 , archivePrefix=

  54. [62]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    Exploring Diverse Generation Paths via Inference-time Stiefel Activation Steering , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=. 2601.22010 , archivePrefix=

  55. [63]

    2026 , url=

    Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behavior , author=. 2026 , url=. 2605.05115 , archivePrefix=

    2026 arXiv

  56. [64]

    2026 , url=

    SteeringDiffusion: A Bottlenecked Activation Control Interface for Diffusion Models , author=. 2026 , url=. 2605.01653 , archivePrefix=

    2026 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Unleashing Diffusion Transformers for Visual Correspondence by Modulating Massive Activations , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=. 2505.18584 , archivePrefix=

  58. [66]

    Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , series=

    HelmFluid: Learning Helmholtz Dynamics for Interpretable Fluid Prediction , author=. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , series=. 2024 , url=

    2024

  59. [67]

    Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , series=

    The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models , author=. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , series=. 2024 , url=

    2024

  60. [68]

    First Conference on Language Modeling (COLM) , year=

    The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets , author=. First Conference on Language Modeling (COLM) , year=. 2310.06824 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    RAVE: Randomized Noise Shuffling for Fast and Consistent Video Editing with Diffusion Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  62. [70]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    CCEdit: Creative and Controllable Video Editing via Diffusion Models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  63. [71]

    2026 , url=

    Gaintseva, Tatiana and Oncescu, Andreea-Maria and Ma, Chengcheng and Liu, Ziquan and Benning, Martin and Slabaugh, Gregory and Deng, Jiankang and Elezi, Ismail , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    2026

  64. [72]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    Training-free Camera Control for Video Generation , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=. 2406.10126 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    , eprint=

    Kundu, Rohit and Dutta, Arindam and Bose, Sarosij and Balachandran, Athula and Roy-Chowdhury, Amit K. , eprint=

  66. [74]

    CVPR Workshop on Hallucination of Observations (HOW) , year=

    Concept Spaces in the Residual Stream of Diffusion Transformers , author=. CVPR Workshop on Hallucination of Observations (HOW) , year=

  67. [75]

    2026 , eprint=

    Xu, Qianxun and Song, Chenxi and Cai, Yujun and Zhang, Chi , booktitle=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  68. [76]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    Temporal-wise Separable Attention for Multi-Event Video Generation , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

  69. [77]

    Wang, Zhen and Xu, Youcan and Xiao, Jun and Chen, Long , eprint=

  70. [78]

    Li, Zhengyu and Yang, Sheng and Song, Jiaming and Liu, Xihui and Zhang, Yong , booktitle=

  71. [79]

    Kulikov, Vladimir and Paiss, Ron and Voynov, Andrey and Mosseri, Inbar and Dekel, Tali and Michaeli, Tomer , eprint=

  72. [80]

    Qiu, Zongyang and Wang, Bingyuan and Chen, Xingbei and others , booktitle=

  73. [81]

    Othman, Naima and Ben Amar, Chokri and Ali, Imen , eprint=

  74. [82]

    2026 , eprint=

    Yang, Jingyuan and Bai, Zihuan and Huang, Hui , booktitle=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  75. [83]

    2023 , eprint=

    Brack, Manuel and Friedrich, Felix and Hintersdorf, Dominik and Struppek, Lukas and Schramowski, Patrick and Kersting, Kristian , booktitle=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  76. [84]

    Ezra, Rotem and Zisling, Hedi and Berman, Nimrod and Naiman, Ilan and Gorkor, Alexey and Nochumsohn, Liran and Nachmani, Eliya and Azencot, Omri , eprint=

  77. [85]

    Kulikov, Vladimir and Kleiner, Matan and Huberman-Spiegelglas, Inbar and Michaeli, Tomer , booktitle=

  78. [86]

    2606.04775 , archivePrefix=

    Activation Steering of Video Generation Models via Reduced-Order Linear Optimal Control , author=. 2606.04775 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , year=

    From Prompt to Progression: Taming Video Diffusion Models for Seamless Attribute Transition , author=. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , year=. 2509.19690 , archivePrefix=

  80. [88]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Delta Denoising Score , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  81. [89]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    Contrastive Denoising Score for Text-Guided Latent Diffusion Image Editing , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  82. [90]

    2025 , eprint=

    Avrahami, Omri and Patashnik, Or and Fried, Ohad and Nemchinov, Egor and Aberman, Kfir and Lischinski, Dani and Cohen-Or, Daniel , booktitle=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  83. [91]

    Liao, Ruotong and Huang, Guowen and Cheng, Qing and Zhai, Guangyao and Zhang, Lei and Xiao, Xun and Seidl, Thomas and Cremers, Daniel and Tresp, Volker , eprint=

  84. [92]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year=

    Video Diffusion Models are Training-free Motion Interpreter and Controller , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year=. 2405.14864 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    2604.04064 , archivePrefix=

    Extracting and Steering Emotion Representations in Small Language Models , author=. 2604.04064 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    Valence-Arousal Subspace in

    Sun, Renjie and Yan, Mingyu and Lu, Kenji and Lee, Yo-Sub and Zhang, Yi and Shao, Jie , booktitle=. Valence-Arousal Subspace in. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  87. [95]

    Grounding

    Liu, Shilong and Zeng, Zhaoyang and Ren, Tianhe and Li, Feng and Zhang, Hao and Yang, Jie and Li, Chunyuan and Yang, Jianwei and Su, Hang and Zhu, Jun and Zhang, Lei , booktitle=. Grounding

  88. [96]

    SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers , pages=

    Follow-Your-Emoji: Fine-Controllable and Expressive Freestyle Portrait Animation , author=. SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers , pages=

    2024

  89. [97]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    MoEE: Mixture of Emotion Experts for Audio-Driven Portrait Animation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

  90. [98]

    ICLR workshop on deep generative models for highly structured data , year=

    Video Diffusion Models , author=. ICLR workshop on deep generative models for highly structured data , year=

  91. [99]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127 , year=

    Stable Video Diffusion: Scaling Latent Video Diffusion Models to Large Datasets , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127 , year=

    arXiv

  92. [100]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04590 , year=

    Follow-Your-Creation: Empowering 4D Creation through Video Inpainting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04590 , year=

    arXiv

  93. [101]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05207 , year=

    Follow-Your-Motion: Video Motion Transfer via Efficient Spatial-Temporal Decoupled Finetuning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05207 , year=

  94. [102]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16869 , year=

    Controllable video generation: A survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16869 , year=

  95. [103]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Dit4Edit: Diffusion Transformer for Image Editing , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  96. [104]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    Diffusion-Based Visual Art Creation: A Survey and New Perspectives , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  97. [105]

    2025 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pages=

    MagicScroll: Enhancing Immersive Storytelling with Controllable Scroll Image Generation , author=. 2025 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pages=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.