Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 124 references

Vector Edge Solitons and Domain Walls in a Nonlinear Mechanical Topological Insulator

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a 2D mechanical topological insulator's weakly nonlinear edge dynamics reduce to a 1D coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation, producing robust vector edge solitons and domain walls.

desk verdict A credible new platform for vector edge solitons in a 2D mechanical topological insulator, but the central CNLS reduction lacks the quantitative validation needed to fully establish the claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06342 v1 pith:SGZQK35H submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.mes-hall nlin.PS

David D. J. M. Snee , Yi-Ping Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallnlin.PS
keywords mechanicaltopologicalinsulatorquantumspinHalleffectvectoredgesolitonscouplednonlinearSchrödingerequationdomainwallsprotectionpendulumlatticesolitoncollisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the weakly nonlinear edge dynamics of a two-dimensional mechanical topological insulator—a square lattice of pendulums with cubic restoring force, connected by springs in the quantum spin Hall geometry—are governed by a one-dimensional two-component coupled nonlinear Schrödinger (CNLS) equation for two edge modes with equal group velocities. On an interface between two lattice halves with opposite spin Chern numbers, the authors tune the interface springs to obtain equal-group-velocity points with favorable CNLS coefficients, and then numerically realize bright-bright, dark-dark, and dark-bright edge solitons as well as edge domain walls in the full lattice. In site-amplitude terms these solutions look like bright and dark breathers, with a time-periodic beat coming from the two carrier frequencies. The authors further show that bright-bright edge solitons pass through compact interface defects with only small energy loss, indicating topological protection, and that collisions between two bright-bright solitons transfer energy between components in a way that could serve collision-based computing. If correct, the paper turns a 2D nonlinear mechanical insulator into a testbed for vector solitons and suggests a path to mechanical information processing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the two linear edge modes $X_r^{(1)}$, $X_r^{(2)}$ of the lattice, and the multiple-scale ansatz (10) that writes the nonlinear wave field as $\epsilon[A e^{i(S k_0 - t \alpha_0)} X_r^{(1)} + B e^{i(S k_0 - t \beta_0)} X_r^{(2)}] + \text{c.c.}$, with envelopes $A$, $B$ depending on slow space $\tilde{S} = \epsilon(S - V_g t)$ and slow time $\tau = \epsilon^2 t$. Substituting this ansatz into the lattice equations of motion (8) and taking inner products with the edge modes at third order yields the CNLS equation (11), whose coefficients are the band curvatures $\alpha''_0$, $\beta''_0$ and the overlap norms $\tilde{\sigma}_1\ldots\tilde{\sigma}_4$. The equal-group-velocity condition $\alpha'_0 = \beta'_0$ is what allows two distinct modes to co-propagate and interact; the paper engineers this condition on an interface separating two topological sectors (flux $\pm 2\pi/3$) by tuning interface spring strengths $\epsilon_S^{(0)}$, $\epsilon_S^{(1)}$. The CNLS solutions are then lifted back to the lattice through the ansatz; the two carrier frequencies $\alpha_0 \neq \beta_0$ produce a site-amplitude beat of period $2\pi/(\alpha_0-\beta_0)$, which is what makes the solitons look like bright or dark breathers. For numerical comparison between the 2D lattice and the 1D CNLS, the paper uses the parity of the interface states to reconstruct the envelopes $A$ and $B$ from the interface-site amplitudes.

What would settle it

Numerically simulate Eq. (8) at the paper's parameters ($\epsilon = 0.1$) and project the evolving field onto the two interface states $X_r^{(1)}$, $X_r^{(2)}$ and onto the bulk spectrum; if the bulk-projected weight grows to order $\epsilon$ within times of order $\epsilon^{-2}$, the CNLS reduction is invalid. Alternatively, a tabletop pendulum experiment measuring the component envelopes $z_A$, $z_B$ after a bright-bright collision should show the predicted asymmetric energy transfer; its absence would falsify the vector-soliton claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the nonlinear interaction between two edge modes with equal group velocities in this mechanical topological insulator is described by the 1D CNLS equation $iA_\tau + \frac{\alpha''_0}{2}A_{\tilde{S}\tilde{S}} + 3A(\tilde{\sigma}_1|A|^2 + 2\tilde{\sigma}_2|B|^2) = 0$ and the analogous equation for $B$ (Eq. (11)), with coefficients $\tilde{\sigma}_i$ determined by overlaps of the two linear edge-mode profiles. Starting from a multiple-scale ansatz that superposes the two edge modes with slowly varying envelopes, the paper derives these equations from the full lattice equations of motion (Eq. (8)) at third order in the small amplitude, with the equal-group-velocity condition $\alpha'_0 = \beta'_0$ making the first two orders consistent. To obtain such points, the paper builds an interface between two lattice halves with opposite spin Chern numbers (flux $\Phi = \pm 2\pi/3$) and tunes three interface coupling parameters; numerically found EGV points yield either focusing or defocusing CNLS coefficients. Substituting known solutions of the CNLS equation—sech-type bright-bright solitons for focusing coefficients, tanh-type dark-dark solitons, heteroclinic domain walls, and dark-bright solitons for defocusing coefficients—into the lattice ansatz, the paper demonstrates stable propagation in the full 2D lattice, with a beat of period $2\pi/(\alpha_0-\beta_0)$ superimposed on the envelopes. It then shows that bright-bright edge solitons survive repeated passage through compact defects, and that a collision between two polarized bright-bright solitons reproduces the CNLS-predicted energy transfer, strengthening one component of each soliton.

Load-bearing premise

The reduction assumes that at small amplitude the wave field is well described by the two linear edge modes with slow envelopes, so that order-$\epsilon^2$ corrections and coupling to bulk modes can be dropped; the paper does not directly verify this by projecting the full lattice dynamics onto the two modes or by checking convergence in $\epsilon$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same CNLS derivation should apply to any two edge modes with an equal-group-velocity point in a reciprocal mechanical topological insulator in symmetry class AII, not just the specific pendulum lattice studied here.
  • Vector edge solitons inherit a larger parameter space than scalar ones: five parameters (group velocity, two frequencies, a wavenumber for a dark component, and a bright-component phase) open up controlled energy transfer in collisions, which the paper suggests could underpin collision-based mechanical computing.
  • Topological protection of bright-bright edge solitons is demonstrated by near-lossless passage through compact defects; the same protection is expected for the dark and domain-wall solutions whenever both carrier frequencies lie in a band gap, though the paper only tests it explicitly for bright-bright solitons.
  • The beat between the two carrier frequencies makes every vector edge soliton a breather in the site amplitudes, so the lattice offers a mechanical platform for studying breather-like topological edge states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The parity-based reconstruction of $A$ and $B$ from interface amplitudes suggests that experimental measurement of the envelopes is straightforward with two pendulum sensors per interface cell, making the predicted beat and collision energy transfer directly testable in a tabletop setup.
  • Because the CNLS coefficients depend on overlaps of the edge modes, one could tune the interface springs to approach the Manakov-integrability conditions the paper lists (EGV, equal curvature, and the angle and final conditions), potentially producing integrable edge dynamics and exact soliton collisions with no radiation.
  • The defect study raises an isospectral question: if two polyomino-shaped defects on the interface have the same linear spectrum, they should scatter edge solitons identically; testing this could link the paper's results to spectral geometry on a topological edge.
  • The bright-bright collision energy transfer, combined with topological protection, suggests a concrete architecture for mechanical logic gates where the presence or absence of a component after collision encodes a bit; the paper does not build such a gate but the collision data provide the required primitive.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a 2D mechanical topological insulator with on-site cubic nonlinearity, derives a 1D two-component coupled nonlinear Schrödinger (CNLS) equation for the envelopes of two edge modes with equal group velocities, and constructs an interface between two topological sectors to obtain EGV points with focusing or defocusing CNLS coefficients. Using these, the authors numerically demonstrate bright-bright, dark-dark, and dark-bright edge solitons as well as edge domain walls in the full 2D lattice, and additionally study topological protection through compact defects and energy transfer in BB soliton collisions.

Significance. If the central reduction is quantitatively valid, this work provides a general and systematic framework for vector edge solitons in nonlinear mechanical topological insulators, extending the authors' earlier scalar edge soliton work. The paper includes explicit coefficient formulas, a detailed construction of the two-sector interface, and extensive numerical simulations. The derivation of Eq. (11) follows standard multiple-scale analysis and the coefficient expressions are plausible. However, the lack of direct quantitative validation of the CNLS reduction against the full lattice dynamics is a substantial gap that, until addressed, limits the strength of the claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III and V] The claim that the full 2D lattice dynamics (8) are governed by the CNLS equation (11) is not quantitatively validated. The evidence consists of qualitative shape preservation in Figs. 5-8, but there is no projection of the full-lattice solution onto the two edge modes X_r^(1), X_r^(2), no convergence study in the small parameter epsilon, and no quantitative comparison of soliton properties (e.g., amplitude, width, velocity) or collision outcomes between the CNLS equation and the full lattice. A robust localized wave could exist even if the effective CNLS coefficients differ from the listed values. Please provide such a validation, for example by computing the overlap of the full solution with the two-mode subspace over time and by repeating a simulation at a smaller epsilon to show that the residual is O(epsilon^2).
  2. [Section VII] The statement that 'the MTI dynamics exhibit more radiation than the CNLS dynamics likely due to higher-order terms becoming non-negligible over the simulation duration, which is well beyond O(epsilon^{-2})' directly weakens the quantitative predictive power of the CNLS reduction for the collision dynamics. The energy transfer is demonstrated only qualitatively. To support the claim that the CNLS governs the collisions, the authors should quantify the discrepancy (e.g., by comparing the exchanged energy or the soliton trajectories) and show that it decreases with epsilon.
  3. [Section VI] The claim of topological protection is not supported by a control. The authors mention that they checked a non-topologically protected BB edge soliton but do not show the simulation. Without this comparison, the observed robustness of the BB soliton could be attributed to the soliton's shape rather than its topological origin. Please provide the control result or at least a quantitative description of its energy loss.
  4. [Section IV and V] The EGV points used to obtain the CNLS coefficients are not shown. The authors state that they will not show the dispersion relations because they resemble Fig. 4. This prevents the reader from verifying the EGV condition, the carrier frequencies, and the group velocities. Please include the dispersion relations for the two parameter sets (Omega_0 = 0.994 and 0.698) or provide a table of the relevant quantities (k_0, alpha_0, beta_0, group velocity, and dispersion coefficients).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section VI] The excitation variables z_A and z_B used to define E_rel are only introduced in Section V.B for the defocusing case; please define them in Section V.A or in Section VI for the focusing case.
  2. [Section V.A] The beat period is given as 778.9, but using the quoted frequencies (alpha_0, beta_0) = (11.797, 11.805) yields 2*pi/0.008 ≈ 785.4; please clarify the calculation or provide more precise frequencies.
  3. [Section IV] For reproducibility, it would be helpful to show the dispersion relations for the two EGV parameter sets, even if as supplementary material.
  4. [Eq. (10)] The ansatz assumes identical spatial dependence e^{i S k_0} for both modes, with different temporal frequencies; it would be helpful to note explicitly that the physical beat arises from the frequency difference.
  5. [Section V] The use of the same symbol \tilde S for the slow space variable in Eq. (10) and in the soliton solutions (e.g., Eq. (13)) where it appears as \tilde S - C_g \tau could be confusing; consider using different notations or clarifying the Galilean shift.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: CNLS coefficients are computed from lattice eigenvectors and solitons are verified by independent full-lattice simulation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the paper's central reduction claim. The CNLS coefficients in Eq. (11) are computed from the linear eigenvectors X_r^(1) and X_r^(2) of Eq. (9), the group velocities, and the nonlinearity parameter σ; they are not fitted to the observed soliton dynamics. The soliton and domain-wall profiles used as initial conditions are solutions of the CNLS equation, and the full 2D lattice is then integrated independently from Eq. (8), so the observed propagation, defect transmission, and collision energy transfer are genuine simulations rather than outputs of a fit. No predicted quantity is simultaneously an input to the prediction: the EGV points and coefficients are found from the dispersion relation, while the reported dynamics come from the full equations. The only notable self-citation is [89], which supplies the classification and explicit forms of localized CNLS solutions; this is prior published work, is reviewed in Appendix A, and does not enter the derivation of the CNLS reduction or any fitted parameter. The paper itself notes that higher-order terms become non-negligible during long collisions and that radiation appears, which is a limitation of the quantitative validation rather than evidence of circularity. The absence of a quantitative projection of the full solution onto the two-mode subspace and of an ε-convergence check is a gap in support, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on two numerically found EGV parameter choices, the standard asymptotic reduction, and the assumption that interface states remain undisturbed by the added nonlinearity. No new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Interface coupling scale Omega_0 (focusing case) = 0.994
    Tuned so that the dispersion relation has an EGV point in the lower band gap with focusing CNLS coefficients (Section V A).
  • Interface coupling scale Omega_0 (defocusing case) = 0.698
    Tuned for an EGV point in the upper band gap with defocusing CNLS coefficients (Section V B).
  • Amplitude small parameter epsilon = 0.1
    Chosen for all full-lattice simulations to justify the weakly nonlinear expansion (Section V, Eq. 10).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Multiple-scale ansatz Eq. (10) with envelope scales epsilon and epsilon^2 captures the dynamics; O(epsilon^2) terms and other modes are negligible.
    Central derivation of CNLS in Section III; no quantitative projection check is reported.
  • domain assumption The on-site cubic term sigma = omega_0^2 / 6 approximates the pendulum's sinusoidal restoring force.
    Section II, after Eqs. (2)-(7).
  • domain assumption The linear lattice realizes a QSH analog with opposite spin Chern numbers and protected helical edge states.
    Inherited from Refs. [29,67]; used for bulk-edge correspondence in Section II.
  • ad hoc to paper An interface with no x-y cross-couplings preserves the two topological sectors.
    Interface construction in Section IV; stated but not proven.
  • domain assumption Classes of localized solutions of the general CNLS Eq. (A1) persist in the nearly symmetric, non-integrable regime of Eq. (11).
    Appendix A relies on the authors' prior classification in Ref. [89].
  • domain assumption Finite lattice width N_r = 26 and periodic boundary conditions in s faithfully represent the interface and vacuum.
    Numerical setup in Section V.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vector Edge Solitons and Domain Walls in a Nonlinear Mechanical Topological Insulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SGZQK35H

@misc{pith2026260806342,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vector Edge Solitons and Domain Walls in a Nonlinear Mechanical Topological Insulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SGZQK35H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06342}
}
read the original abstract

We report nonlinear edge waves in a 2D mechanical topological insulator. A bulk lattice consists of pendulums with on-site cubic nonlinearity connected by linear springs realizing quantum spin Hall effect. We show that the nonlinear interaction between two edge modes with equal group velocities (EGV) is described by a 1D two-component coupled nonlinear Schr\"odinger (CNLS) equation. On the interface separating two bulk lattices with opposite spin Chern numbers, we construct linear springs such that the dispersion relation exhibits EGV points with favorable CNLS coefficients. Thus, we realize nonlinear edge waves propagating along the interface, including bright-bright (BB) edge solitons for focusing CNLS coefficients, and dark-dark edge solitons, edge domain walls, and dark-bright edge solitons for defocusing CNLS coefficients. In terms of the site amplitudes, these solutions resemble bright and dark breathers. These solutions should be topologically protected when both carrier frequencies lie within a band gap, which we explicitly show by passing BB edge solitons through compact defects on the interface. We also show energy transfer in BB edge soliton collisions with potential application to collision-based computing. Generally, vector edge solitons exhibit a large parameter space for soliton collisions, which endows mechanical devices with greater potential for information processing and other functionalities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06342 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic view of the connections be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) The dispersion relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) MTI with two topological sectors. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) The dispersion relation in the lower band gap with crossing point at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) BB edge soliton propagating along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) Two DD edge solitons propagating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Two edge DWs propagating along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (Color online) (a) The parameter space ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (Color online) Energy transfer in a collision between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insulators, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Curvature condition:α ′′ 0 =β ′′ 0

  3. [3]

    Angle condition: ˜σ 1 ˜σ3 = 4˜σ 2 ˜σ4, i.e., ∥X (1) r ∥2 4∥X (2) r ∥2 4 = 2∥X (1) r X (2) r ∥2 2, implying that the angle between the two vectors|X (1) r |2 and |X (2) r |2 isπ/3

  4. [4]

    To satisfy all four conditions, three free parameters are needed in addition tok 0

    Final condition: ˜σ 1 = 2˜σ 4, i.e.,β 0/α0 = 2∥X (1) r X (2) r ∥2 2/∥X (1) r ∥4 4. To satisfy all four conditions, three free parameters are needed in addition tok 0. If we further require global edge integrability for allk 0, then EGV for allk 0 is equivalent to the shift conditionα(k 0) =β(k 0) + constant for allk0, so the curvature condition is redunda...

  5. [5]

    symbiosis

    The interface is betweenr=N r/2−1 andN r/2, so the two sub-lattices have equal sizes. We assume periodicity in thes-direction and vacuum forr /∈[0, Nr −1]. A. F ocusing CNLS coefficients The interface couplingsϵ (0) S = Ω 0fandϵ (1) S =ϵ (2) S = Ω0f /2 with Ω0 = 0.994 yields an EGV point in the lower band gap at the carrier wavenumberk 0 = 2.011. The carr...

  6. [6]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Reviews of modern physics83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized hall resistance, Physical Review Letters45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  8. [8]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Physical review letters 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the” parity anomaly”, Physical review letters61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  2. [10]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the inte- ger quantum hall effect, Physical review letters71, 3697 (1993)

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the inte- ger quantum hall effect, Physical review letters71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Physical review letters95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  4. [12]

    B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall effect, Physical review letters96, 106802 (2006)

    2006

  5. [13]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect, Physical review letters95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    Sheng, Z

    D. Sheng, Z. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. Haldane, Quan- tum spin-hall effect and topologically invariant chern numbers, Physical review letters97, 036808 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Qi, Y.-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, General theo- rem relating the bulk topological number to edge states in two-dimensional insulators, Physical Review B74, 045125 (2006)

    2006

  8. [16]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quan- tum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells, science314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Konig, S

    M. Konig, S. Wiedmann, C. Brune, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall insulator state in hgte quantum wells, Science318, 766 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Si- mon, O. Zilberberg,et al., Topological photonics, Re- views of Modern Physics91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Cooper, J

    N. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. Spielman, Topological bands for ultracold atoms, Reviews of modern physics 91, 015005 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    T. Shah, C. Brendel, V. Peano, and F. Marquardt, Colloquium: Topologically protected transport in engi- neered mechanical systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 021002 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Haldane and S

    F. Haldane and S. Raghu, Possible realization of di- rectional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry, Physical Review Let- ters100, 013904 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states, Nature461, 772 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, Photonic floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    A. B. Khanikaev, S. H. Mousavi, W.-K. Tse, M. Kargar- ian, A. H. MacDonald, and G. Shvets, Photonic topo- logical insulators, Nature materials12, 233 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. Taylor, Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics, Na- ture Photonics7, 1001 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    S. D. Huber, Topological mechanics, Nature Physics12, 621 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Prodan and C

    E. Prodan and C. Prodan, Topological phonon modes and their role in dynamic instability of microtubules, Physical review letters103, 248101 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    Peano, C

    V. Peano, C. Brendel, M. Schmidt, and F. Marquardt, Topological phases of sound and light, Physical Review X5, 031011 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    L. M. Nash, D. Kleckner, A. Read, V. Vitelli, A. M. Turner, and W. T. Irvine, Topological mechanics of gyroscopic metamaterials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 14495 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    P. Wang, L. Lu, and K. Bertoldi, Topological phononic crystals with one-way elastic edge waves, Physical re- view letters115, 104302 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Kariyado and Y

    T. Kariyado and Y. Hatsugai, Manipulation of dirac cones in mechanical graphene, Scientific reports5, 18107 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Wang, P.-G

    Y.-T. Wang, P.-G. Luan, and S. Zhang, Coriolis force induced topological order for classical mechanical vibra- tions, New Journal of Physics17, 073031 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    S¨ usstrunk and S

    R. S¨ usstrunk and S. D. Huber, Observation of phononic helical edge states in a mechanical topological insulator, Science349, 47 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Smirnova, D

    D. Smirnova, D. Leykam, Y. Chong, and Y. Kivshar, Nonlinear topological photonics, Applied Physics Re- views7, 021306 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    M. J. Ablowitz and J. T. Cole, Nonlinear optical waveg- uide lattices: Asymptotic analysis, solitons, and topo- logical insulators, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 440, 133440 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Szameit and M

    A. Szameit and M. C. Rechtsman, Discrete nonlinear topological photonics, Nature Physics20, 905 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    M. J. Ablowitz, C. W. Curtis, and Y.-P. Ma, Linear and nonlinear traveling edge waves in optical honeycomb lat- tices, Physical Review A90, 023813 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Y.-P. Ma, Strong transmission and reflection of edge modes in bounded photonic graphene, Optics letters40, 4635 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    M. J. Ablowitz, C. W. Curtis, and Y.-P. Ma, Adiabatic dynamics of edge waves in photonic graphene, 2D Ma- terials2, 024003 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Lumer, M

    Y. Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. Plotnik, and M. Segev, Instability of bosonic topological edge states in the pres- ence of interactions, Physical Review A94, 021801 (2016). 16

    2016

  33. [41]

    M. J. Ablowitz and J. T. Cole, Tight-binding meth- ods for general longitudinally driven photonic lattices: Edge states and solitons, Physical Review A96, 043868 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    S. K. Ivanov, Y. V. Kartashov, L. J. Maczewsky, A. Sza- meit, and V. V. Konotop, Edge solitons in lieb topolog- ical floquet insulator, Optics letters45, 1459 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    S. K. Ivanov, Y. V. Kartashov, L. J. Maczewsky, A. Sza- meit, and V. V. Konotop, Bragg solitons in topological floquet insulators, Optics Letters45, 2271 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Bazhan, B

    N. Bazhan, B. Malomed, and A. Yakimenko, Joseph- son oscillations of edge quasi-solitons in a photonic- topological coupler, Optics Letters46, 6067 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Z. Shi, M. Zuo, H. Li, D. Preece, Y. Zhang, and Z. Chen, Topological edge states and solitons on a dynamically tunable domain wall of two opposing helical waveguide arrays, Acs Photonics8, 1077 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    B. Ren, Y. V. Kartashov, H. Wang, Y. Li, and Y. Zhang, Floquet topological insulators with hybrid edges, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals166, 113010 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Y. V. Kartashov and D. V. Skryabin, Modulational in- stability and solitary waves in polariton topological in- sulators, Optica3, 1228 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    D. R. Gulevich, D. Yudin, D. V. Skryabin, I. V. Iorsh, and I. A. Shelykh, Exploring nonlinear topologi- cal states of matter with exciton-polaritons: Edge soli- tons in kagome lattice, Scientific reports7, 1780 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    C. Li, F. Ye, X. Chen, Y. V. Kartashov, A. Ferrando, L. Torner, and D. V. Skryabin, Lieb polariton topolog- ical insulators, Physical Review B97, 081103 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. V. Kartashov, and A. Ferrando, Interface states in polariton topological insulators, Physical Re- view A99, 053836 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Leykam and Y

    D. Leykam and Y. D. Chong, Edge solitons in nonlinear- photonic topological insulators, Physical review letters 117, 143901 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Mukherjee and M

    S. Mukherjee and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of flo- quet solitons in a topological bandgap, Science368, 856 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Mukherjee and M

    S. Mukherjee and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of uni- directional solitonlike edge states in nonlinear floquet topological insulators, Physical Review X11, 041057 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Zhang, R

    Z. Zhang, R. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. V. Kartashov, F. Li, H. Zhong, H. Guan, K. Gao, F. Li, Y. Zhang,et al., Ob- servation of edge solitons in photonic graphene, Nature communications11, 1902 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Y. V. Kartashov, A. Arkhipova, S. Zhuravitskii, N. Skryabin, I. Dyakonov, A. Kalinkin, S. Kulik, V. O. Kompanets, S. Chekalin, L. Torner,et al., Observation of edge solitons in topological trimer arrays, Physical review letters128, 093901 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    S. K. Ivanov, Y. V. Kartashov, A. Szameit, L. Torner, and V. V. Konotop, Vector topological edge solitons in floquet insulators, ACS Photonics7, 735 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    S. K. Ivanov, Y. V. Kartashov, M. Heinrich, A. Sza- meit, L. Torner, and V. V. Konotop, Topological dipole floquet solitons, Physical Review A103, 053507 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Y. Tian, Y. Wang, M. R. Beli´ c, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and F. Ye, Vector valley hall edge solitons in distorted type- ii dirac photonic lattices, Optics Express31, 20812 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    R. K. Pal, J. Vila, M. Leamy, and M. Ruzzene, Amplitude-dependent topological edge states in non- linear phononic lattices, Physical Review E97, 032209 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    R. K. Pal, M. Schaeffer, and M. Ruzzene, Helical edge states and topological phase transitions in phononic systems using bi-layered lattices, Journal of Applied Physics119, 084305 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    D. D. Snee and Y.-P. Ma, Edge solitons in a nonlin- ear mechanical topological insulator, Extreme Mechan- ics Letters30, 100487 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Chaunsali and G

    R. Chaunsali and G. Theocharis, Self-induced topologi- cal transition in phononic crystals by nonlinearity man- agement, Physical Review B100, 014302 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Darabi and M

    A. Darabi and M. J. Leamy, Tunable nonlinear topolog- ical insulator for acoustic waves, Physical Review Ap- plied12, 044030 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Chaunsali, H

    R. Chaunsali, H. Xu, J. Yang, P. G. Kevrekidis, and G. Theocharis, Stability of topological edge states under strong nonlinear effects, Physical Review B103, 024106 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Many Manda, R

    B. Many Manda, R. Chaunsali, G. Theocharis, and C. Skokos, Nonlinear topological edge states: From dy- namic delocalization to thermalization, Physical Review B105, 104308 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    J. R. Tempelman, K. H. Matlack, and A. F. Vakakis, Topological protection in a strongly nonlinear interface lattice, Physical Review B104, 174306 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    M. I. Rosa, M. J. Leamy, and M. Ruzzene, Amplitude- dependent edge states and discrete breathers in non- linear modulated phononic lattices, New Journal of Physics25, 103053 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    LeGrande, A

    J. LeGrande, A. Malla, M. Bukhari, and O. Barry, In- troduction of local resonators to a nonlinear metamate- rial with topological features, Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics19, 071007 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Ezawa, Nonlinear topological phase transitions in the dimerized sine-gordon model, Physical Review B 105, 165418 (2022)

    M. Ezawa, Nonlinear topological phase transitions in the dimerized sine-gordon model, Physical Review B 105, 165418 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Physical review B14, 2239 (1976)

    1976

  63. [71]

    S¨ usstrunk and S

    R. S¨ usstrunk and S. D. Huber, Classification of topolog- ical phonons in linear mechanical metamaterials, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, E4767 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    S. V. Manakov, On the theory of two-dimensional sta- tionary self-focusing of electromagnetic waves, Soviet Physics-JETP38, 248 (1974)

    1974

  65. [73]

    Zakharov and S

    V. Zakharov and S. Manakov, The theory of resonance interaction of wave packets in nonlinear media, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.69, 1654 (1975)

    1975

  66. [74]

    Menyuk, Nonlinear pulse propagation in birefringent optical fibers, IEEE Journal of Quantum electronics23, 174 (1987)

    C. Menyuk, Nonlinear pulse propagation in birefringent optical fibers, IEEE Journal of Quantum electronics23, 174 (1987)

    1987

  67. [75]

    Z. Chen, M. Segev, T. H. Coskun, D. N. Christodoulides, and Y. S. Kivshar, Coupled pho- torefractive spatial-soliton pairs, JOSA B14, 3066 (1997)

    1997

  68. [76]

    E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, Z. Chen, and M. Segev, Interaction between vector solitons and soli- tonic gluons, Optics letters24, 327 (1999)

    1999

  69. [77]

    P. K. Shukla, I. Kourakis, B. Eliasson, M. Marklund, and L. Stenflo, Instability and evolution of nonlinearly interacting water waves, Physical Review Letters97, 094501 (2006). 17

    2006

  70. [78]

    M. J. Ablowitz and T. P. Horikis, Interacting nonlinear wave envelopes and rogue wave formation in deep water, Physics of Fluids27, 012107 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    Griffiths, R

    S. Griffiths, R. Grimshaw, and K. Khusnutdinova, Mod- ulational instability of two pairs of counter-propagating waves and energy exchange in a two-component system, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena214, 1 (2006)

    2006

  72. [80]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein conden- sation and superfluidity, Vol. 164 (Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    P. G. Kevrekidis, D. J. Frantzeskakis, and R. Carretero- Gonz´ alez,The defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tion: from dark solitons to vortices and vortex rings (SIAM, 2015)

    2015

  74. [82]

    V. E. Zakharov and E. Schulman, To the integrability of the system of two coupled nonlinear schr¨ odinger equa- tions, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena4, 270 (1982)

    1982

  75. [83]

    Sahadevan, K

    R. Sahadevan, K. Tamizhmani, and M. Lakshmanan, Painleve analysis and integrability of coupled non-linear schrodinger equations, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and General19, 1783 (1986)

    1986

  76. [84]

    Wang, D.-J

    D.-S. Wang, D.-J. Zhang, and J. Yang, Integrable prop- erties of the general coupled nonlinear schr¨ odinger equa- tions, Journal of Mathematical Physics51, 023510 (2010)

    2010

  77. [85]

    Yang, Classification of the solitary waves in coupled nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena108, 92 (1997)

    J. Yang, Classification of the solitary waves in coupled nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena108, 92 (1997)

    1997

  78. [86]

    Yang and Y

    J. Yang and Y. Tan, Fractal structure in the collision of vector solitons, Physical review letters85, 3624 (2000)

    2000

  79. [87]

    N. F. Smyth and W. L. Kath, Radiative losses due to pulse interactions in birefringent nonlinear optical fibers, Physical Review E63, 036614 (2001)

    2001

  80. [88]

    Haelterman and A

    M. Haelterman and A. Sheppard, Bifurcations of the dark soliton and polarization domain walls in nonlinear dispersive media, Physical Review E49, 4512 (1994)

    1994

  81. [89]

    A. P. Sheppard and Y. S. Kivshar, Polarized dark soli- tons in isotropic kerr media, Physical Review E55, 4773 (1997)

    1997

  82. [90]

    Haelterman and A

    M. Haelterman and A. Sheppard, Polarization domain walls in diffractive or dispersive kerr media, Optics Let- ters19, 96 (1994)

    1994

  83. [91]

    Haelterman and A

    M. Haelterman and A. P. Sheppard, Vector soliton asso- ciated with polarization modulational instability in the normal-dispersion regime, Physical Review E49, 3389 (1994)

    1994

  84. [92]

    B. A. Malomed, Optical domain walls, Physical Review E50, 1565 (1994)

    1994

  85. [93]

    D. D. Snee and Y.-P. Ma, Domain walls and vector solitons in the coupled nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57, 035702 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Kevrekidis and D

    P. Kevrekidis and D. Frantzeskakis, Solitons in coupled nonlinear schr¨ odinger models: a survey of recent devel- opments, Reviews in Physics1, 140 (2016)

    2016

  87. [95]

    ¨Ohberg and L

    P. ¨Ohberg and L. Santos, Dark solitons in a two- component bose-einstein condensate, Physical Review Letters86, 2918 (2001)

    2001

  88. [96]

    Trippenbach, K

    M. Trippenbach, K. G´ oral, K. Rzazewski, B. Malomed, and Y. Band, Structure of binary bose-einstein conden- sates, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics33, 4017 (2000)

    2000

  89. [97]

    Coen and M

    S. Coen and M. Haelterman, Domain wall solitons in binary mixtures of bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters87, 140401 (2001)

    2001

  90. [98]

    Alama, L

    S. Alama, L. Bronsard, A. Contreras, and D. E. Peli- novsky, Domain walls in the coupled gross–pitaevskii equations, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analy- sis215, 579 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    Busch and J

    T. Busch and J. Anglin, Dark-bright solitons in inho- mogeneous bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters87, 010401 (2001)

    2001

  92. [100]

    Becker, S

    C. Becker, S. Stellmer, P. Soltan-Panahi, S. D¨ orscher, M. Baumert, E.-M. Richter, J. Kronj¨ ager, K. Bongs, and K. Sengstock, Oscillations and interactions of dark and dark–bright solitons in bose–einstein condensates, Nature Physics4, 496 (2008)

    2008

  93. [101]

    Hamner, J

    C. Hamner, J. Chang, P. Engels, and M. Hoefer, Generation of dark-bright soliton trains in superfluid- superfluid counterflow, Physical review letters106, 065302 (2011)

    2011

  94. [102]

    S. W. Golomb,Polyominoes: puzzles, patterns, prob- lems, and packings, Vol. 16 (Princeton University Press, 1996). Polyominoes with four cells, i.e., tetrominoes, are used by the video game Tetris, which was first beaten by a human player on 21 Dec 2023

    1996

  95. [103]

    Kac, Can one hear the shape of a drum?, The amer- ican mathematical monthly73, 1 (1966)

    M. Kac, Can one hear the shape of a drum?, The amer- ican mathematical monthly73, 1 (1966)

    1966

  96. [104]

    Giraud and K

    O. Giraud and K. Thas, Hearing shapes of drums: Mathematical and physical aspects of isospectrality, Re- views of modern physics82, 2213 (2010)

    2010

  97. [105]

    M. H. Jakubowski, K. Steiglitz, and R. Squier, State transformations of colliding optical solitons and possi- ble application to computation in bulk media, Physical Review E58, 6752 (1998)

    1998

  98. [106]

    M. H. Jakubowski, K. Steiglitz, and R. Squier, Comput- ing with solitons: a review and prospectus, Collision- based computing , 277 (2002)

    2002

  99. [107]

    Yasuda, P

    H. Yasuda, P. R. Buskohl, A. Gillman, T. D. Murphey, S. Stepney, R. A. Vaia, and J. R. Raney, Mechanical computing, Nature598, 39 (2021)

    2021

  100. [108]

    X. Guo, L. Jezequel, M. Padlewski, H. Lissek, P. Delplace, and R. Fleury, Practical realization of chiral nonlinearity for strong topological protection, SciPost Physics18, 034 (2025)

    2025

  101. [109]

    K. H. Matlack, M. Serra-Garcia, A. Palermo, S. D. Hu- ber, and C. Daraio, Designing perturbative metama- terials from discrete models, Nature materials17, 323 (2018)

    2018

  102. [110]

    H. Xue, Y. Yang, and B. Zhang, Topological acoustics, Nature Reviews Materials7, 974 (2022)

    2022

  103. [111]

    Miniaci and R

    M. Miniaci and R. Pal, Design of topological elastic waveguides, Journal of Applied Physics130(2021)

    2021

  104. [112]

    G. U. Patil and K. H. Matlack, Review of exploiting nonlinearity in phononic materials to enable nonlinear wave responses, Acta Mechanica233, 1 (2022)

    2022

  105. [113]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topological insulators, Science advances4, eaat0346 (2018)

    2018

  106. [114]

    Yi and C

    J. Yi and C. Q. Chen, Delocalization and higher-order topology in a nonlinear elastic lattice, New Journal of Physics26, 063004 (2024)

    2024

  107. [115]

    Prabith, G

    K. Prabith, G. Theocharis, and R. Chaunsali, Nonlin- ear corner states in a topologically nontrivial kagome lattice, Physical Review B110, 104307 (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    Y.-L. Tao, N. Dai, Y.-B. Yang, Q.-B. Zeng, and Y. Xu, 18 Hinge solitons in three-dimensional second-order topo- logical insulators, New Journal of Physics22, 103058 (2020)

    2020

  109. [117]

    C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Communications Physics1, 39 (2018)

    2018

  110. [118]

    Imhof, C

    S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, F. Schindler, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, T. Neupert,et al., Topolectrical-circuit real- ization of topological corner modes, Nature Physics14, 925 (2018)

    2018

  111. [119]

    Kotwal, F

    T. Kotwal, F. Moseley, A. Stegmaier, S. Imhof, H. Brand, T. Kießling, R. Thomale, H. Ronellenfitsch, and J. Dunkel, Active topolectrical circuits, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2106411118 (2021)

    2021

  112. [120]

    S. Yves, R. Fleury, F. Lemoult, M. Fink, and G. Lerosey, Topological acoustic polaritons: robust sound manip- ulation at the subwavelength scale, New Journal of Physics19, 075003 (2017)

    2017

  113. [121]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Tian, Y. Cheng, Q. Wei, X. Liu, and J. Christensen, Topological acoustic delay line, Physi- cal Review Applied9, 034032 (2018)

    2018

  114. [122]

    Li and X

    S. Li and X. Mao, Training all-mechanical neural net- works for task learning through in situ backpropagation, Nature communications15, 10528 (2024)

    2024

  115. [123]

    Li and X

    S. Li and X. Mao, Topological mechanical neural net- works as classifiers through in situ backpropagation learning, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 250, 114198 (2026)

    2026

  116. [124]

    Kevrekidis, H

    P. Kevrekidis, H. Nistazakis, D. Frantzeskakis, B. A. Malomed, and R. Carretero-Gonz´ alez, Families of matter-waves in two-component bose-einstein conden- sates, The European Physical Journal D-Atomic, Molec- ular, Optical and Plasma Physics28, 181 (2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.