REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 54 references
$\omega$-0: A Latent Predictive World Action Model for Concurrent Humanoid Loco-Manipulation
T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A single model, ω-0, predicts controller-compatible whole-body actions with latent future visual foresight, reporting 79–82 percent success on 11 real-world household humanoid tasks versus 44.5 percent for the strongest baseline.
desk verdict A well-specified whole-body humanoid VLA with a genuinely novel latent-predictive objective and a substantial new dataset, but the headline numbers rest on thin statistics and an unquantified SONIC replay filter that the paper never validates. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing mechanism is the joint video-action latent predictor: a transformer in which learnable motion queries (one per future action step) and video queries (future latent tokens) self-attend separately, cross-attend to a prefix built from whole-body VLM features, T5 text features, a view token, and V-JEPA visual features, and finally let motion queries attend to video queries, with token-specific rotary position encodings (2D for visual prefix patches, 3D for future video queries, 1D for action steps). The action branch is a diffusion transformer that denoises the 66-dimensional SONIC action latent (a 64-dimension whole-body latent plus two hand-close commands) with an x0-prediction objective; the video branch is supervised by an L2 loss against future observation embeddings extracted by a frozen Wan encoder. A whole-body FAST tokenizer converts continuous action trajectories into discrete tokens so that the Qwen3-VL backbone can be pretrained as an action-aware VLM, and SONIC simulation replay converts public human motions into executable state-action latent pairs, with untrackable motions filtered out. Training-time real-time chunking anchors each predicted chunk to the clean prefix of the previous one, which the deployment loop mirrors through warm starts and overlap blending.
What would settle it
Run the released ω-0 checkpoint on the same 11-task suite and per-trial progress protocol on a G1 humanoid; if the reproduced aggregate success rate falls well below the reported 79.1–81.8 percent, the central claim fails. A more surgical check targets causation: since removing the video-query branch drops success to 64.5 percent in the paper's own ablation, replacing the predicted future latents with random or frozen features at inference and observing whether success holds would test whether latent foresight, rather than the diffusion and state conditioning, is the actual driver.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On its own terms, the paper establishes ω-0 as a latent predictive world-action model: given a language instruction, a current visual observation (egocentric RGB, exocentric RGB, or exocentric depth), and a 47-dimensional proprioceptive state, the model predicts a chunk of 25 future whole-body action latents that SONIC executes at more than 7 Hz in a receding horizon. The design couples two outputs—future action latents and future visual latents—through a shared query-based predictor in which motion queries attend to video queries, so task-progress and scene-evolution cues are injected into action generation without ever reconstructing a video. The evidence is a real-world evaluation on 11 household tasks with a single multi-task policy: 79.1 percent success for the ego-only variant and 81.8 percent for the omni-view variant, against 44.5 percent for the strongest baseline, together with ablations showing that removing the future-latent branch, the VLM prefix, robot state, or real-time chunking each degrades performance. The paper also contributes ω-HOME, a 40.3-hour dataset of 4,827 teleoperated episodes with synchronized multi-view RGB-D, SMPL motion, robot state, and action latents, and reports that pre-training on non-overlapping ω-HOME data further improves downstream success.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the SONIC controller replays human and public motion data faithfully enough in simulation that the resulting 66-dimensional action latents are a valid supervision signal for real G1 behavior; trajectories SONIC cannot track are filtered out in Section 3.3, but the paper does not independently verify that the surviving latent space covers what the 11 tasks require.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the reported numbers hold up, a single multi-task policy without task-specific heads or separate locomotion and manipulation modules is sufficient for a wide spread of household loco-manipulation on a real humanoid.
- Latent predictive world modeling captures the benefit of future prediction: visual foresight can supervise action learning as compact embeddings, making test-time video generation unnecessary for control.
- Public human video and motion corpora can be converted into robot-executable supervision through controller replay, shifting the bottleneck for humanoid skills from robot-specific data collection to controller coverage and data filtering.
- Viewpoint-flexible training (egocentric plus exocentric RGB and depth with view tokens) improves real-world execution, particularly on locomotion-heavy tasks where first-person vision is insufficient.
- Pre-training on non-overlapping ω-HOME trajectories improves downstream fine-tuning, indicating that broader real-world humanoid demonstrations add reusable priors beyond the target tasks.
Reading between the lines
- If the latent-prediction formulation transfers to other embodiments, video-centered world-action pipelines may be paying a large inference cost for little control benefit; a direct comparison on a fixed task suite could quantify that overhead.
- Because the action space is exactly what SONIC can replay, the model's behavioral repertoire is bounded by the controller's tracking coverage; a testable extension is measuring how much task coverage is lost when dynamic motions are filtered in Stage 2, and whether pairing the interface with a second controller widens the achievable behaviors.
- The per-trial progress tables show failures concentrate in final stages (placing objects inside receptacles, closing drawers and doors, retaining all collected objects), which suggests a targeted retry or recovery mechanism at those stages may yield more than additional pretraining.
- The human-data transfer result implies the pipeline could be scaled by ingesting more human demonstration data; a natural experiment is measuring success rate as a function of added human hours to see whether gains are log-linear or saturate.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proposes ω-0, a latent predictive whole-body world-action model for humanoid loco-manipulation. The model takes language, visual observations (egocentric RGB, exocentric RGB or depth), and robot proprioceptive state, and predicts a chunk of controller-compatible whole-body action latents via a diffusion DiT, while a lightweight auxiliary branch predicts future visual embeddings in latent space. Training is staged: (1) a VLM is fine-tuned on discrete whole-body action tokens; (2) public human-motion datasets are converted into SONIC-compatible action latents through simulation replay and used to train a joint video-action latent predictor; (3) the model is fine-tuned on a newly collected 40.3-hour real-robot dataset (ω-HOME, 4,827 episodes, 24 tasks). The authors report real-world evaluations on 11 household tasks, with ω-0Ego achieving 79.1% success and ω-0Omni 81.8%, versus 44.5% for the strongest baseline (ψ-0), plus ablations and generalization experiments.
Significance. If the claims hold, this is a valuable contribution to humanoid loco-manipulation: it demonstrates a single model that couples latent future prediction with diffusion-based action generation on real hardware, and it introduces a substantial multimodal dataset. The paper is commendable for including per-trial progress annotations for ω-0Ego (Appendix C.2), a controlled ablation set (Table 4), and a task suite that stresses whole-body coordination. The latent predictive formulation is a plausible alternative to video-centered world-action models. However, the significance is contingent on two load-bearing pieces of evidence: that the Stage-2 SONIC replay actually grounds human/public priors into executable action latents, and that the reported performance advantage is statistically and procedurally robust. Neither is currently established at the level required to confirm the quantitative superiority claim.
major comments (3)
- [Section 3.3 and Section 5.1] The Stage-2 grounding claim is unvalidated. The text states that 'Motions that cannot be reliably executed by SONIC are filtered out,' but it never reports the retention rate, the filter criterion, or any tracking error for the accepted trajectories on the real G1. Because the final policy is also trained on 2,220 real-robot demonstrations (Section 5.1), the observed 79.1% success could in principle be entirely due to Stage-3 real data, with Stage-2 contributing little. The ablations in Table 4 remove components such as the video query or RTC, but no experiment isolates the contribution of Stage-2 pre-training itself. Please quantify the SONIC replay filter (how many ARCTIC/Xperience-10M/Motion-X trajectories were accepted), report real-robot tracking metrics on a held-out set of accepted trajectories, and add an ablation that trains the pipeline without Stage-2 (or without public data) while keeping everything else identical.
- [Section 6.1 and Section 6.4] The quantitative superiority claim rests on 10 trials per task per method (110 trials per method overall), with no confidence intervals, error bars, or statistical tests, and success is judged by manual annotation of progress stages with no described automated verification. Appendix C.2 provides per-trial progress tables only for ω-0Ego; the baselines and ω-0Omni are reported only as aggregate tables or per-task figures. The reported gaps (e.g., 79.1% vs 44.5% over ψ-0 in Table 2) are large, but with n=10 per task and subjective annotation, the evidence does not support the precise 'consistently outperform' claim. Please report per-trial data for all methods, provide at least exact binomial confidence intervals or bootstrap intervals for each success rate, and describe the annotation protocol (e.g., multiple annotators, inter-annotator agreement, or a preregistered rubric).
- [Section 3.3, Section 3.4, and Section 6] Reproducibility is hampered by missing settings. The video loss weight λ_video in Eq. (11) and in the Stage-3 objective is never assigned a value; the DDIM inference is described in Section 3.3 only as 'a small number of denoising steps,' with no number given in Section B.1 (which does specify H=25, K=8, and 7 Hz inference); and the SONIC replay filter threshold is undefined. The paper also does not state whether code, trained checkpoints, or the ω-HOME dataset will be released. Since the paper's contribution is a systems result plus a dataset, please specify these values and the release plan, or provide an anonymous repository link in the revised version.
minor comments (6)
- [Section 4 and Section 5.1] The dataset counts are inconsistent: the abstract and Section 4 say 40+ hours, 4,827 episodes, 24 tasks, while Section 5.1 says the real-robot training data covers 11 tasks with about 200 demonstrations each and 2,220 trajectories in total. Please clarify how the 24 tasks are split between the downstream evaluation set and the pre-training pool, and how many of the 4,827 episodes are used in each stage.
- [Figure 2] The training-stage legend in Figure 2 is garbled ('VLMVLMVLM : Frozen: Pretrain: Finetune'), and the figure does not clearly indicate which modules are trained in which stage. Please redraw the legend and add stage labels to the diagram.
- [Section 6.4] For ω-0Omni, the paper selects exocentric observations for five specific tasks and egocentric for the remaining six. Please state explicitly that this is a single policy with a view token and not task-specific model selection, and explain how the view choice would be made at deployment time for a novel task.
- [Appendix C] The per-trial progress tables are provided only for ω-0Ego. Adding the same tables for ω-0Omni and at least the strongest baseline (ψ-0) would make the comparison transparent and would strengthen the paper's own auditability claim.
- [References] The 'Xperience-10M (Ropedia, 2026)' entry is a dataset without a peer-reviewed paper or a persistent URL; please add a stable link or a technical report reference. Also, the baseline name appears inconsistently as 'GR00T-N1.7' in the text and 'GROOT N1.7' in Appendix E; unify the spelling.
- [Section 3.3] The phrase 'lightweight future observation embedding prediction' could be misread, since the supervision uses a frozen Wan encoder's latent space. Please clarify that the 'lightweight' refers to the absence of a video decoder at inference, not to the size of the supervisory encoder.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the model's action and video targets come from external supervision (SONIC replay and frozen Wan embeddings), and the central claims are supported by ablations rather than by definition or self-citation.
full rationale
Walking the derivation chain, the paper's two training objectives are not defined in terms of the model's own outputs. Stage 2's loss is L_stage2 = L_action + lambda_video * L_video, where L_video = ||h_v - y^v_{t+1:t+K}||^2_2 with y extracted from a frozen Wan encoder, and L_action = ||z_0_hat - z_0||^2_2 with z_0 obtained from SONIC simulation replay of human motion. Neither target is the model's own prediction, so the 'prediction' of whole-body action latents does not reduce by construction to a fitted version of the evaluation metric. The claim that future visual latent prediction provides task-progress cues is supported by an explicit ablation (Table 4: removing the video query drops success rate from 79.1% to 64.5% for omega-0_Ego), not merely asserted. The noted risk that SONIC replay might not faithfully cover executable behaviors is a real empirical robustness gap, but it is not circularity: the paper never defines the target action latent in terms of the model's outputs, and the filter for unreliable motions is described as a data-processing step rather than a hidden fit to the downstream result. Self-citations appear (for example, the ablation section says 'Following prior work (Wei et al., 2026)' for RTC), but they are not load-bearing: RTC's contribution is ablated in Table 4, and no central claim is justified solely by a same-author citation. Overall, the derivation is self-contained with respect to the definitional circularity patterns; the main weaknesses are experimental auditability issues, not circular reasoning.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (4)
- λ_video (video loss weight) =
not reported
- SONIC replay filter threshold =
not reported
- FAST tokenizer vocabulary size =
not reported
- DDIM inference denoising steps =
not reported
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption SONIC is a reliable whole-body controller and its action-latent interface is executable on the real G1 humanoid.
- domain assumption Frozen Wan encoder latents are a useful target for future visual latent prediction, and minimizing L_video improves action generation.
- domain assumption Public human motion datasets (ARCTIC, Xperience-10M, Motion-X) can be converted to SMPL, zero-yaw normalized, and replayed by SONIC without losing the visual-motion priors.
- domain assumption V-JEPA single-frame features are sufficiently action-relevant for conditioning.
- standard math Diffusion x0-prediction, attention with RoPE, and next-token prediction are valid standard ML building blocks.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of $\omega$-0: A Latent Predictive World Action Model for Concurrent Humanoid Loco-Manipulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ETWFWQL4
@misc{pith2026260806375,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: $\omega$-0: A Latent Predictive World Action Model for Concurrent Humanoid Loco-Manipulation},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ETWFWQL4}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06375}
}
abstract
Humanoid household tasks often require concurrent loco-manipulation, where the robot must move, adjust posture, maintain balance, and manipulate objects as a single coordinated behavior. Yet existing humanoid policies typically decompose locomotion and manipulation, while recent world-action models remain either arm-centric or video-centered. We present $\omega$-0, a latent predictive whole-body world-action model for real-world humanoid concurrent loco-manipulation. Given a language instruction, current visual observation, and robot proprioceptive state, $\omega$-0 directly predicts controller-compatible whole-body action latents for real-robot execution. Rather than reconstructing future videos, $\omega$-0 learns compact future observation embeddings as a lightweight predictive objective, coupling latent visual foresight with diffusion-based whole-body action generation. The model supports egocentric RGB, exocentric RGB, and exocentric depth inputs, and leverages controller-based simulation replay to ground human/public visual-motion priors into robot-executable action latents. We further collect $\omega$-HOME, a 40+ hour real-world household humanoid dataset with synchronized multi-view observations, whole-body SMPL motions, robot states, and action latents. Real-world experiments on 11 household tasks demonstrate that a single $\omega$-0 model can produce smooth manipulate-while-moving behaviors and consistently outperform representative imitation learning, VLA, humanoid, and WAM baselines.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747 , year=
Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747 , year=
-
[2]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 , year=
Qwen3-vl technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 , year=
-
[3]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09985 , year=
V-jepa 2: Self-supervised video models enable understanding, prediction and planning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09985 , year=
-
[4]
Journal of machine learning research , volume=
Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer , author=. Journal of machine learning research , volume=
-
[5]
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=
Scalable diffusion models with transformers , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=
-
[6]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 , year=
Denoising diffusion implicit models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 , year=
arXiv 2010
-
[7]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07820 , year=
Sonic: Supersizing motion tracking for natural humanoid whole-body control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07820 , year=
-
[8]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05964 , year=
Training-time action conditioning for efficient real-time chunking , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05964 , year=
Show all 54 references
-
[9]
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
ARCTIC: A dataset for dexterous bimanual hand-object manipulation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
-
[10]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05098 , year=
Motion-x++: A large-scale multimodal 3d whole-body human motion dataset , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05098 , year=
-
[11]
2026 , publisher=
Xperience-10M: A Large-Scale Egocentric Multimodal Dataset with Structured 3D/4D Annotations , author=. 2026 , publisher=
2026
-
[12]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705 , year=
Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705 , year=
-
[13]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13778 , year=
Internvla-m1: A spatially guided vision-language-action framework for generalist robot policy , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13778 , year=
-
[14]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054 , year=
pi0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054 , year=
-
[15]
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
H-rdt: Human manipulation enhanced bimanual robotic manipulation , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
-
[16]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12440 , year=
Egovla: Learning vision-language-action models from egocentric human videos , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12440 , year=
-
[17]
The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=
Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion , author=. The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=. 2025 , publisher=
2025
-
[18]
2025 , booktitle =
NVIDIA and Johan Bjorck and Fernando Castañeda, Nikita Cherniadev and Xingye Da and Runyu Ding and Linxi "Jim" Fan and Yu Fang and Dieter Fox and Fengyuan Hu and Spencer Huang and Joel Jang and Zhenyu Jiang and Jan Kautz and Kaushil Kundalia and Lawrence Lao and Zhiqi Li and Z...
2025
-
[19]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12263 , year=
Psi0: An Open Foundation Model Towards Universal Humanoid Loco-Manipulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12263 , year=
-
[20]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.16666 , year=
Fast-wam: Do world action models need test-time future imagination? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.16666 , year=
-
[21]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10448 , year=
Dit4dit: Jointly modeling video dynamics and actions for generalizable robot control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10448 , year=
-
[22]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03738 , year=
Amo: Adaptive motion optimization for hyper-dexterous humanoid whole-body control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03738 , year=
-
[23]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.11047 , year=
Wholebodyvla: Towards unified latent vla for whole-body loco-manipulation control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.11047 , year=
-
[24]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.22174 , year=
OpenHLM: An Empirical Recipe for Whole-Body Humanoid Loco-Manipulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.22174 , year=
-
[25]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817 , year=
Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817 , year=
-
[26]
Conference on Robot Learning , pages=
Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=
2023
-
[27]
7th Annual Conference on Robot Learning , year=
Homerobot: Open-vocabulary mobile manipulation , author=. 7th Annual Conference on Robot Learning , year=
-
[28]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10447 , year=
Tidybot++: An open-source holonomic mobile manipulator for robot learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10447 , year=
-
[29]
Autonomous Robots , volume=
Tidybot: Personalized robot assistance with large language models , author=. Autonomous Robots , volume=. 2023 , publisher=
2023
-
[30]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02117 , year=
Mobile aloha: Learning bimanual mobile manipulation with low-cost whole-body teleoperation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02117 , year=
-
[31]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14803 , year=
Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14803 , year=
-
[32]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15692 , year=
mimic-video: Video-action models for generalizable robot control beyond vlas , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15692 , year=
-
[33]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21998 , year=
Causal World Modeling for Robot Control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21998 , year=
-
[34]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21539 , year=
Worldvla: Towards autoregressive action world model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21539 , year=
-
[35]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00200 , year=
Unified video action model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00200 , year=
-
[36]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13030 , year=
Motus: A unified latent action world model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13030 , year=
-
[37]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16163 , year=
Cosmos policy: Fine-tuning video models for visuomotor control and planning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16163 , year=
-
[38]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.17240 , year=
GigaWorld-Policy: An Efficient Action-Centered World--Action Model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.17240 , year=
-
[39]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922 , year=
World action models are zero-shot policies , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922 , year=
-
[40]
Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2 , pages=
SMPL: A skinned multi-person linear model , author=. Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2 , pages=
-
[41]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14770 , year=
Gmt: General motion tracking for humanoid whole-body control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14770 , year=
-
[42]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13196 , year=
Exbody2: Advanced expressive humanoid whole-body control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13196 , year=
-
[43]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01143 , year=
Asap: Aligning simulation and real-world physics for learning agile humanoid whole-body skills , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01143 , year=
-
[44]
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
Kungfubot: Physics-based humanoid whole-body control for learning highly-dynamic skills , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
-
[45]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23650 , year=
Do you have freestyle? expressive humanoid locomotion via audio control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23650 , year=
-
[46]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23649 , year=
Robomirror: Understand before you imitate for video to humanoid locomotion , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23649 , year=
-
[47]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14952 , year=
From Language to Locomotion: Retargeting-free Humanoid Control via Motion Latent Guidance , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14952 , year=
-
[48]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07356 , year=
Unitracker: Learning universal whole-body motion tracker for humanoid robots , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07356 , year=
-
[49]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.03985 , year=
Humanoid-GPT: Scaling Data and Structure for Zero-Shot Motion Tracking , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.03985 , year=
-
[50]
Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
Attention is all you need , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
-
[51]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.09215 , year=
MotionWAM: Towards Foundation World Action Models for Real-Time Humanoid Loco-Manipulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.09215 , year=
-
[52]
International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=
Lamp: Language-motion pretraining for motion generation, retrieval, and captioning , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=
-
[53]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09864 , year=
Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09864 , year=
-
[54]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314 , year=
Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314 , year=
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.