Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models

As of 15 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 12 of 12 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.06529.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2608.06529 v1

Coverage vector

measured 12 of 12 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.300904Z

measured 12 of 12 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

12 of 12 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy5
unresolved7
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 187b5d33-2b71-4f38-b586-b9b8d6a022dc · outbound

This paper cites , V}B×L): standard lookupE[x].

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models , V}B×L): standard lookupE[x]

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.547649Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 2f60c4bd-69c3-4a59-8acf-0c6f0bb45e59 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.529203Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation e1333cd6-839d-44d9-8651-f5d58bbe8a5b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.509240Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 43696d5b-f3e3-4997-9175-431d98d3572a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.492559Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 6558738a-98de-4286-8852-eb91823e7cee · outbound

This paper cites Generalized Interpolating Discrete Diffusion.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Generalized Interpolating Discrete Diffusion

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.268410Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4c65005e-f96f-48a7-9a6a-03bade9b6815 · outbound

This paper cites At a typical mask- ing rate of 30-70%, this reduces FLOPs and intermediate memory by a factor proportional to the masking fraction.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models At a typical mask- ing rate of 30-70%, this reduces FLOPs and intermediate memory by a factor proportional to the masking fraction

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.477929Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation e393db21-74df-4b98-b562-115346affe87 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.462036Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 760e45d0-20d1-45ac-98df-2cd83a68c156 · outbound

This paper cites H Distributed Training Considerations The S-SM pathway is fully compatible with Py- Torch DDP (Distributed Data Parallel).

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models H Distributed Training Considerations The S-SM pathway is fully compatible with Py- Torch DDP (Distributed Data Parallel)

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.446169Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation ef2b9358-bbd2-44df-afc4-3c058a0fd974 · outbound

This paper cites InProceedings of the 61st An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (V olume 1: Long Papers), pages 11575– 11596.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models InProceedings of the 61st An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (V olume 1: Long Papers), pages 11575– 11596

Reference 2023

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.566450Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation a218d6b7-e056-4c5d-9de7-7eb46d3d0208 · outbound

This paper cites Language Modeling with Hyperspherical Flows.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Language Modeling with Hyperspherical Flows

Reference 2024

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.247655Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f5b912da-5ff5-4656-bdd6-273bf9ed7eb2 · outbound

This paper cites Michael Hersche, Samuel Moor-Smith, Thomas Hof- mann, and Abbas Rahimi.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Michael Hersche, Samuel Moor-Smith, Thomas Hof- mann, and Abbas Rahimi

Reference 2025

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.263078Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8283f0e6-59a9-43d8-a358-7f44752bd101 · outbound

This paper cites Xiaochuang Han, Sachin Kumar, and Yulia Tsvetkov.

Lost in Interpolation: Why Predictive Feedback Fails in Diffusion Language Models Xiaochuang Han, Sachin Kumar, and Yulia Tsvetkov

Reference 2026

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-10T04:19:58.583096Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.