Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

The structural relaxation time of a polymer glass during deformation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the structural relaxation time of a deforming polymer glass can be read directly from the segmental correlation time measured by probe reorientation.

desk verdict A genuinely new experimental protocol for tracking segmental dynamics through a strain-rate switch, but the headline claim that tau_seg equals the structural relaxation time rests on a model fit to the same data. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06575 v1 pith:XDP6RKJC submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.soft

Pradip K. Bera , Grigori A. Medvedev , James M. Caruthers , Mark D. Ediger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords polymerglassstructuralrelaxationtimesegmentalcorrelationstrainrateswitchingmaterialfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleachingPMMAplasticflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how long structural relaxation takes in a polymer glass that is being deformed, and it answers with an optical measurement. In strain-rate switching experiments on a lightly cross-linked PMMA glass below its glass transition, the segmental correlation time $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$, obtained from probe reorientation decays, evolves monotonically to a new steady state after the strain rate is changed, even though the macroscopic stress passes through an undershoot or overshoot. The authors argue that the measured transition time of $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ provides an unambiguous experimental estimate of the structural relaxation time during deformation, and that this time is very close to the segmental correlation time itself. If correct, the work extends the established quiescent-state link between segmental mobility and structural relaxation into the mechanically driven flow regime, and it gives modelers a direct experimental proxy for the structural state variable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the segmental correlation time $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ extracted from Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts fits to fluorescence anisotropy decays of DPPC probe molecules embedded in the glass; the authors read this quantity as a direct reporter of polymer segmental dynamics. The key identity is that the transition time of $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ after a strain-rate switch tracks the relaxation time of the structural state variable in the constitutive model, so the optical measurement can stand in for the structural relaxation time during deformation. The material-time integral $\xi = \int_0^t (\tau_u/\tau_{\mathrm{seg}})\,dt'$, where $\tau_u$ is the undeformed segmental time, is the mechanism used to test whether correlation functions are invariant under a deformation-dependent clock.

What would settle it

Perform the same strain-rate switch while independently measuring segmental dynamics with a second probe or method, then compare transition times; if the optical $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ and the independent reporter disagree immediately after the switch—or if the fitted $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ is biased by the poorly described decays—the claim that the structural relaxation time during deformation equals the segmental correlation time is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For steady-state to steady-state strain-rate switches at $T_g - 19$ K, the paper's central experimental finding is that $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ changes monotonically with a characteristic time $\tau_{\tau-\mathrm{seg}} = 1330 \pm 110$ s for the high-to-low switch, while the stress relaxes more slowly ($\tau_{\sigma} = 3760 \pm 160$ s) and non-monotonically. In the reverse switch, all quantities evolve too quickly for the transition times to be distinguished. Because a microscopic constitutive theory used by the authors has its structural state variable $S_0$ relax on the same time scale as $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$, the paper concludes that $\tau_{\tau-\mathrm{seg}}$ is a reasonable estimate of the structural relaxation time during deformation, and that structural relaxation during flow is essentially controlled by the deformation-accelerated segmental motion. A second finding is that anisotropy decay curves measured at different deformation states collapse when plotted against material time $\xi = \int_0^t (\tau_u / \tau_{\mathrm{seg}}) \, dt'$, supporting the material-time approximation commonly used in polymer deformation modeling.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the optical probe's stretched-exponential reorientation time faithfully reports the true segmental dynamics during the rapidly changing transient after a strain-rate switch, even though some of those decays are not well described by the fitting function.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • During a steady-state-to-steady-state flow transition, the structural relaxation time can be measured optically from $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$, avoiding the ambiguity created by the non-monotonic stress response.
  • Polymer deformation models that use the material-time approximation gain experimental support: anisotropy decays from different deformation states superpose when rescaled by $\xi$.
  • The stress undershoot and overshoot after a strain-rate switch are stress-level lags, not signs of non-monotonic structural relaxation; the structural state relaxes monotonically.
  • The equality between structural relaxation time and segmental correlation time, well established for quiescent glasses, is extended to mechanically driven steady states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}} \approx \tau_S$ holds more generally, then constitutive models could be calibrated using in-situ optical $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ as a direct proxy for the structural state variable, simplifying parameter estimation.
  • The material-time collapse suggests a testable equivalence between deformation rate, temperature, and aging time: varying the strain-rate switch ratio at different depths below $T_g$ should preserve the material-time master curve if the assumption is universal.
  • The anomalous stretched-exponential decays observed immediately after switching are a place to probe dynamic heterogeneity; a shape analysis beyond a single $\tau_{\mathrm{seg}}$ could reveal whether deformation acts only on the average time or also on the distribution of relaxation times.
  • A multi-rate switching series could test a quantitative corollary: if the structural relaxation time during flow is set by segmental motion, the measured $\tau_{\tau-\mathrm{seg}}$ should scale systematically with the applied strain rate across the flow regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports strain-rate switching experiments on a lightly cross-linked PMMA glass at T_g - 19 K, with simultaneous measurements of the stress, the local strain rate, and the segmental correlation time tau_seg obtained from the reorientation of a DPPC probe via fluorescence anisotropy. After a switch from 6e-5 s^-1 to 6e-6 s^-1, the stress shows an undershoot while tau_seg evolves monotonically to the new steady state with a transition time tau_tau-seg = 1330 +/- 110 s, shorter than the stress transition time tau_sigma = 3760 +/- 160 s. The authors interpret tau_tau-seg as an estimate of the structural relaxation time tau_S during deformation, invoking the Chen-Schweizer model, and also report that the anisotropy decay curves superpose when plotted in a material time defined from the fitted tau_seg. The central claims are that the structural relaxation time during deformation is approximately equal to the segmental correlation time and that the material time approximation is supported.

Significance. If established, the paper would provide the first direct measurement of the structural relaxation time of a polymer glass in a mechanically driven steady state, and would strongly support the material-time modeling framework used widely in polymer glass deformation. The experimental data appear repeatable, as demonstrated by the three overlapping stress curves in Fig. S2, and the in-situ FRAP measurements during a strain-rate switch are a creative extension of the authors' earlier work. The main value of the paper is the monotonic, well-separated evolution of tau_seg relative to the stress, which challenges purely stress-based interpretations of steady-state transitions. However, the interpretive chain from tau_seg to the structural relaxation time relies on a model whose parameters are optimized on the same switching data, so the headline claim is not independently measured.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplemental Material, 'Chen and Schweizer model calculations'; main text, Fig. 4 and adjacent paragraphs] The central claim that the measured tau_tau-seg provides a reasonable estimate of tau_S rests on the Chen-Schweizer model, but in the model (Eqs. S1-S3) tau_seg is an explicit function of the structural state variable S0 (lambda = S0^-1.5), so the time scales of tau_seg and S0 are kinetically coupled by construction. Moreover, the supplement states that sigma_c = 100 MPa and S_g = 0.245 were optimized to get the best prediction for the strain rate switching experiments. The agreement in Fig. S5 is therefore not an independent confirmation that the experimental tau_tau-seg equals the structural relaxation time. The experiment measures only probe reorientation and its KWW-derived tau_seg; no structural-state observable is measured. The manuscript should either provide an operational definition of the structural relaxation time during deformation that is measured directly, or explicitly label the identification as a model-based hypothesis and remove the word 'unambiguous' from the abstract and the main text.
  2. [Main text, 'In order to further analyze our results...' paragraph and Fig. 3] The material time test uses the fitted tau_seg curves to define the clock via xi = integral(tau_u/tau_seg) dt', i.e., the very quantity that is fitted from the same anisotropy decays. Since a KWW function with constant beta is invariant under this time transformation, the reported collapse of the anisotropy decays in material time is partly built into the analysis. The authors should demonstrate that the collapse is not a tautology by, for example, choosing an independent clock based on the stress or local strain rate, or by quantifying the scatter of the collapse in material time relative to the scatter in real time. As written, the claim that the experiments are 'reasonably consistent' with the material time assumption is supported, but the evidence is weaker than the text suggests.
  3. [Main text, Figs. 1c, 2c and the discussion of beta; Supplemental Fig. S4] The manuscript reports that several anisotropy decay curves, especially those recorded immediately after the strain-rate switch, cannot be well described by the KWW function and yield anomalous beta parameters. Nevertheless, the fitted tau_seg values from these curves are included in the monotonic evolution of tau_seg and in the determination of the transition times tau_tau-seg = 1330 +/- 110 s and 200 +/- 45 s. If the KWW functional form is invalid during the transient, the fitted tau_seg values are biased, and the extracted transition times and the claim of monotonicity may be artifacts. The authors should quantify the fitting residuals for the affected curves, report alternative shape fits (e.g., log-Gaussian or mean relaxation time), and show that the extracted transition times are robust to excluding curves that are not well described by KWW.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Summary] The abstract reports the measurement temperature as T_g - 19 K while the Summary states T_g - 20 K; these should be made consistent (T_g = 399 K gives 380 K as T_g - 19 K).
  2. [Fig. 1d caption] The caption identifies the fitted time constants only as 'green curve' and 'magenta curve'; it should specify which segment of the experiment each curve represents (pre-switch steady state vs. post-switch transition).
  3. [Supplemental Material, Eq. (S2) and related text] The statement 'equation S1 will vanish' for a pure aging system is imprecise; it is d(sigma)/dt that vanishes, not the equation itself.
  4. [Main text, model comparison paragraphs] The model parameters G_0, sigma_c, lambda_c, and tau_0 are used in Eqs. (S1)-(S3) but are not all defined in the main text; a brief definition in the text or a caption would improve readability.
  5. [Main text, Fig. 3 and material time definition] The text should specify how the material time integral is discretized and whether tau_u is the pre-deformation tau_seg value from the same experiment; this would clarify the calculation and aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The model 'prediction' is fit to the switching data, and the τ_seg–S0 coupling that yields τ_{τ−seg}≈τ_S is built into the model equations; the headline identification is an imported interpretation rather than an independent measurement.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplemental Material, 'Chen and Schweizer model calculations'; main text comparison with Chen-Schweizer model]
    "Finally, we optimized the values σ_c=100MPa and S_g=0.245 to get the best prediction for the strain rate switching experiments."

    The Chen-Schweizer model is presented as predicting the switching response ('The Chen-Schweizer model qualitatively predicts the changes...'), and the same model is then used to conclude that τ_{τ−seg}≈τ_S, so that the experimental τ_{τ−seg} is taken to estimate the structural relaxation time. But σ_c and S_g were explicitly optimized against the very strain-rate-switching experiments being compared. The agreement is therefore a fit, not an independent test; using that fitted agreement to validate the measured τ_{τ−seg} as τ_S makes the supporting evidence circular.

  2. self definitional [Main text Results (identification of τ_{τ−seg} with τ_S); Supplemental Chen-Schweizer model equations (Eqs. S2, S3)]
    "we observe that τ τ−seg ≈τ S. This was also noted by Chen and Schweizer [45] and within the context of the model, τ S is the structural relaxation time. So the experimental observation of τ τ−seg provides a reasonable estimate of the τS in case of steady-state to steady-state transition of flow of polymer glass."

    In the model equations, τ_seg is an explicit function of the structural state S0 (Eq. S3 uses λ=S0^-1.5) and S0 evolves on the τ_seg time scale (Eq. S2). Hence τ_{τ−seg}≈τ_S is a built-in consequence of the model's kinetic coupling, not an independently derived or measured relation. The experiment reports only τ_seg; no independent observable of S0 or τ_S is measured. Stating that the measured τ_{τ−seg} provides a reasonable estimate of τ_S transfers the model's construction onto the data rather than deriving the structural relaxation time from the data.

full rationale

The experiment contains a genuine, self-contained measurement: DPPC probe reorientation is fit to KWW to obtain τ_seg, and the monotonic evolution of τ_seg after strain-rate switches is a real observable. The material-time superposition test uses the same fitted τ_seg curves to rescale the anisotropy decays; it is a consistency check rather than a fully independent prediction, but it is not a circular derivation and is not scored as one. The circularity burden is concentrated in the conversion of τ_{τ−seg} into the structural relaxation time τ_S. That conversion is made through the Chen-Schweizer model, whose parameters (σ_c=100 MPa, S_g=0.245) were optimized to match the very strain-rate-switching experiments being interpreted. In addition, within that model τ_seg is an explicit function of S0 (Supplemental Eq. S3, λ=S0^-1.5), so the near-equality of the τ_seg and S0 relaxation times is built into the model construction rather than being an independent theoretical result. The 'Toy model 1' generality check comes from ref. [47] with overlapping authorship and repeats the same state-variable/τ_seg coupling, so it does not supply independent external confirmation. The headline claim that the measured τ_{τ−seg} gives the structural relaxation time is therefore not directly measured; it is an interpretive identification carried by a model that was fit to the target data. Score 6 reflects this partial circularity while recognizing the independent value of the τ_seg measurements.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental claim about tau_seg evolution is direct and rests mainly on the FRAP/KWW measurement assumptions. The model-interpretation claims rest on several calibrated parameters: sigma_c and S_g are fitted to the switching experiments, and S_l, tau_0, and S_0 are imported from aging data. The structural state variable S0 is not invented here; it comes from the prior Chen-Schweizer model.

free parameters (6)
  • sigma_c = 100 MPa
    Chen-Schweizer model parameter optimized to 'best prediction' of the strain-rate switching experiments (Supplemental Material). The model comparison is therefore a fit to the target data.
  • S_g = 0.245
    Structural state ceiling adjusted in the same optimization as sigma_c to match the switching data.
  • G_0 = about 470 MPa
    Shear modulus input estimated from the initial slope of the stress-strain curve in Fig. 1a; calibrated from the same experimental sample.
  • S_l = 0.148
    Structural state floor chosen by reproducing aging data from Ricci et al.; used in Eq. S2 of the Chen-Schweizer model.
  • tau_0 = 47 s
    Prefactor in Eq. S3 chosen to reproduce aging data from Ricci et al.
  • S_0(t=0) = 0.243
    Initial structural state from aging data, shifted to t=2160 s before deformation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The KWW stretched-exponential function describes the anisotropy decay and yields a meaningful segmental correlation time.
    Used throughout to extract tau_seg from every FRAP decay. Prior work supports this in quiescent and deformed PMMA, but the paper also reports decays immediately after switching that are poorly described by KWW.
  • domain assumption Reorientation of the DPPC probe faithfully reports PMMA segmental dynamics during deformation.
    Load-bearing for equating tau_seg with structural relaxation time. Based on previous probe reorientation studies cited as refs. 37-39.
  • domain assumption Material time is governed by the segmental correlation time via xi = integral(tau_u/tau_seg) dt'.
    This is the hypothesis under test, but it is also used to construct the material time axis in Figs. 3 and S4, so the collapse test is partly self-referential.
  • domain assumption The Chen-Schweizer constitutive equations S1-S3 describe PMMA glass deformation.
    Used for the qualitative interpretation of the stress undershoot and overshoot. The equations are imported from prior literature and calibrated with several fitted parameters.
  • domain assumption Deformation is spatially homogeneous on the micron scale observed.
    Supplemental material reports homogeneous deformation in the field of view, which justifies treating local strain rate as representative and using global strain rates as model inputs.
  • domain assumption Light cross-linking leaves PMMA glass dynamics essentially unchanged at the same T - Tg.
    Stated in the Supplemental Material; supports transferability of conclusions to uncrosslinked PMMA.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The structural relaxation time of a polymer glass during deformation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XDP6RKJC

@misc{pith2026260806575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The structural relaxation time of a polymer glass during deformation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XDP6RKJC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06575}
}
read the original abstract

In order to determine the structural relaxation time of a polymer glass during deformation, a strain rate switching experiment is performed in the steady-state plastic flow regime. A lightly cross-linked poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) glass was utilized, and simultaneously the segmental motion in the glass was quantified using an optical probe reorientation method. After the strain rate switch, a non-monotonic stress response is observed, consistent with previous work. The correlation time for segmental motion, in contrast, monotonically evolves towards a new steady-state, providing an unambiguous measurement of the structural relaxation time during deformation, which is found to be approximately equal to the segmental correlation time. The Chen-Schweizer model qualitatively predicts the changes in the segmental correlation time and the observed non-monotonic stress response. In addition, our experiments are reasonably consistent with the material time assumption used in polymer deformation modeling; in this approach, the response of a polymer glass to a large deformation is described by combining a linear-response model with a time-dependent segmental correlation time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06575 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. High to low strain rate switching experiment (switching from 6 × 10−5 s −1 to 6 × 10−6 s −1 at t = 3075 s). (a) Time dependence of measured stress σ; along with the functional fit Y = Ys + (Yi −Ys)exp(−(t −t0)/τY ) starting after the minimum at 4000 s, shown as the red curve. The fitted transition time is τσ = 3760±160 s. (b) Measured local strain rate; γ˙locl is plotted with t. (c) A subset of the normalized anisot… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Low to high strain rate switching experiment (switching from 6×10−6 s −1 to 6×10−5 s −1 at t = 17114 s). Variations of σ, γ˙locl, a few r(t ′ )/r(0), and τseg are shown in (a), (b), (c), (d) respectively. Error bars are fitting errors. Solid curves in (d) are the functional fits Y = Ys + (Yi −Ys)exp(−(t −t0)/τY ) with time scales ττ−seg = 2365±85 s for the green curve and ττ−seg = 200±45 for the magenta curve. aniso… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental time vs. material time: (a and c) the variation of τseg vs t during the full span of the experiments (fitted data from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chen-Schweizer model predictions for strain rate switching experiments on PMMA glass, using the global strain rates 6 × 10−5 s −1 and 6 × 10−6 s −1 as inputs. Model outputs are the time variation of (a) the stress σ, (b) the segmental correlation time τseg, and (c) the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hodge, I. M. Physical aging in polymer glasses. Science , 267(5206):1945--1947, 1995

    work page 1945

  2. [2]

    D., Angell, C

    Ediger, M. D., Angell, C. A., and Nagel, S. R. Supercooled liquids and glasses. The Journal of Physical Chemistry , 100(31):13200--13212, 1996

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    Struik, L. C. E. Physical aging in amorphous polymers and other materials , volume 106. Elsevier: Oxford, 1978

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    D., Kumar, S., and Sastry, S

    Parmar, A. D., Kumar, S., and Sastry, S. Strain localization above the yielding point in cyclically deformed glasses. Physical Review X , 9(2):021018, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Mota, R. M. O., Lund, E. T., Sohn, S., Browne, D. J., Hofmann, D. C., Curtarolo, S., van de Walle, A., and Schroers, J. Enhancing ductility in bulk metallic glasses by straining during cooling. Communications Materials , 2(1):23, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    McKenna, G. B. Mechanical rejuvenation in polymer glasses: fact or fallacy? Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 15(11):S737, 2003

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    and Riggleman, R

    Yang, E. and Riggleman, R. A. Role of local structure in the enhanced dynamics of deformed glasses. Physical Review Letters , 128(9):097801, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    A., Schweizer, K

    Riggleman, R. A., Schweizer, K. S., and Pablo, J. J. d. Nonlinear creep in a polymer glass. Macromolecules , 41(13):4969--4977, 2008

    work page 2008

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Liu, A. Y. H. and Rottler, J. Aging under stress in polymer glasses. Soft Matter , 6(19):4858--4862, 2010

    2010

  2. [10]

    Kovacs, A. J. ``transition vitreuse dans les polym \`e res amorphes'' in etude ph \'e nom \'e nologique. Advances in Polymer Science , 3:394--507, 1963

    1963

  3. [11]

    Relaxation in Glass and Composites

    Scherer, G. Relaxation in Glass and Composites . Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1986

    1986

  4. [12]

    and Sh \'a n e lov \'a , J

    M \'a lek, J. and Sh \'a n e lov \'a , J. Properties and applications of amorphous materials . Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 2001

    2001

  5. [13]

    D., Ellison, C

    Priestley, R. D., Ellison, C. J., Broadbelt, L. J., and Torkelson, J. M. Structural relaxation of polymer glasses at surfaces, interfaces, and in between. Science , 309(5733):456--459, 2005

    2005

  6. [14]

    D., Kundu, P., and Sastry, S

    Parmar, A. D., Kundu, P., and Sastry, S. Density dependence of relaxation dynamics in glass formers, and the dependence of their fragility on the softness of inter-particle interactions. Journal of Chemical Sciences , 129:1081--1091, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Dependence of the glass transition and jamming densities on spatial dimension

    Adhikari, M., Karmakar, S., and Sastry, S. Dependence of the glass transition and jamming densities on spatial dimension. Physical Review Letters , 131(16):168202, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Supercooled liquids and glasses by dielectric relaxation spectroscopy

    Richert, R. Supercooled liquids and glasses by dielectric relaxation spectroscopy. Advances in Chemical Physics , 156:101--195, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    One experiment makes a direct comparison of structural recovery with equilibrium relaxation

    Richert, R. One experiment makes a direct comparison of structural recovery with equilibrium relaxation. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 157(22):224501, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    B., and Dyre, J

    Hecksher, T., Olsen, N. B., and Dyre, J. C. Communication: Direct tests of single-parameter aging. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 142(24):241103, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    B., and Dyre, J

    Hecksher, T., Olsen, N. B., and Dyre, J. C. Fast contribution to the activation energy of a glass-forming liquid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 116(34):16736--16741, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    A theoretical framework for calculations of the structural relaxation time on the basis of the free energy landscape theory

    Ekimoto, T., Yoshimori, A., Odagaki, T., and Yoshidome, T. A theoretical framework for calculations of the structural relaxation time on the basis of the free energy landscape theory. Chemical Physics Letters , 577:58--61, 2013

    2013

  13. [21]

    B., Niss, K., and Dyre, J

    Hecksher, T., Olsen, N. B., Niss, K., and Dyre, J. C. Physical aging of molecular glasses studied by a device allowing for rapid thermal equilibration. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 133(17):174514, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Schawe, J. E. Vitrification in a wide cooling rate range: The relations between cooling rate, relaxation time, transition width, and fragility. The Journal of chemical physics , 141(18):184905, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    K., Jin, X., Wu, T., Liu, Y., and Wang, L

    Saini, M. K., Jin, X., Wu, T., Liu, Y., and Wang, L. M. Interplay of intermolecular interactions and flexibility to mediate glass forming ability and fragility: A study of chemical analogs. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 148(12):124504, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    M., and Cangialosi, D

    Di Lisio, V., Stavropoulou, V. M., and Cangialosi, D. Physical aging in molecular glasses beyond the relaxation. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 159(6):064505, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Some aspects of the glass transition of polyvinylpyrrolidone depending on the molecular mass

    Lapuk, S., Ponomareva, M., Ziganshin, M., Larionov, R., Mukhametzyanov, T., Schick, C., Lounev, I., and Gerasimov, A. Some aspects of the glass transition of polyvinylpyrrolidone depending on the molecular mass. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 25(15):10706--10714, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    and Ames, N

    Anand, L. and Ames, N. On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer. International journal of plasticity , 22(6):1123--1170, 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    Extending the egp constitutive model for polymer glasses to multiple relaxation times

    Van Breemen, L., Klompen, E., Govaert, L., and Meijer, H. Extending the egp constitutive model for polymer glasses to multiple relaxation times. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 59(10):2191--2207, 2011

    2011

  20. [28]

    Transition mechanism from elastic deformation to plastic flow in poly (methyl methacrylate)

    Nanzai, Y. Transition mechanism from elastic deformation to plastic flow in poly (methyl methacrylate). Polymer Engineering & Science , 30(2):96--107, 1990

    1990

  21. [29]

    Medvedev, G. A. and Caruthers, J. M. ``A comparison of constitutive descriptions of the thermo-mechanical behavior of polymeric glasses'' in Polymer Glasses . Taylor & Fransis Books: London, 2016

    2016

  22. [30]

    N., Paeng, K., Swallen, S

    Lee, H. N., Paeng, K., Swallen, S. F., and Ediger, M. Dye reorientation as a probe of stress-induced mobility in polymer glasses. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 128(13):134902, 2008

    2008

  23. [31]

    N., Riggleman, R

    Lee, H. N., Riggleman, R. A., de Pablo, J. J., and Ediger, M. Deformation-induced mobility in polymer glasses during multistep creep experiments and simulations. Macromolecules , 42(12):4328--4336, 2009

    2009

  24. [32]

    Y., Long, D

    P \'e rez Aparicio, R., Cottinet, D., Crauste Thibierge, C., Vanel, L., Sotta, P., Delannoy, J. Y., Long, D. R., and Ciliberto, S. Dielectric spectroscopy of a stretched polymer glass: heterogeneous dynamics and plasticity. Macromolecules , 49(10):3889--3898, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Relaxation time of a polymer glass stretched at very large strains

    Sahli, R., Hem, J., Crauste Thibierge, C., Cl \'e ment, F., Long, D., and Ciliberto, S. Relaxation time of a polymer glass stretched at very large strains. Physical Review Materials , 4(3):035601, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    A model of structural relaxation in glass

    Narayanaswamy, O. A model of structural relaxation in glass. Journal of the American Ceramic Society , 54(10):491--498, 1971

    1971

  27. [35]

    A., Mehri, S., Ingebrigtsen, T

    Riechers, B., Roed, L. A., Mehri, S., Ingebrigtsen, T. S., Hecksher, T., Dyre, J. C., and Niss, K. Predicting nonlinear physical aging of glasses from equilibrium relaxation via the material time. Science Advances , 8(11):eabl9809, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    ricci2018direct,lee2009direct,schindelin2012fiji,bending2014measurement,chen2010theory

    See Supplemental Material following the main text for additional experimental details and Chen--Schweizer model calculations; it includes Refs. ricci2018direct,lee2009direct,schindelin2012fiji,bending2014measurement,chen2010theory

  29. [37]

    N., Paeng, K., Swallen, S

    Lee, H. N., Paeng, K., Swallen, S. F., and Ediger, M. Direct measurement of molecular mobility in actively deformed polymer glasses. Science , 323(5911):231--234, 2009

    2009

  30. [38]

    Measurement of segmental mobility during constant strain rate deformation of a poly (methyl methacrylate) glass

    Bending, B., Christison, K., Ricci, J., and Ediger, M. Measurement of segmental mobility during constant strain rate deformation of a poly (methyl methacrylate) glass. Macromolecules , 47(2):800--806, 2014

    2014

  31. [39]

    Direct comparison of probe reorientation and linear mechanical measurements of segmental dynamics in glassy poly (methyl methacrylate)

    Ricci, J., Bennin, T., and Ediger, M. Direct comparison of probe reorientation and linear mechanical measurements of segmental dynamics in glassy poly (methyl methacrylate). Macromolecules , 51(19):7785--7793, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Ediger, M. D. Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in supercooled liquids. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry , 51(1):99--128, 2000

    2000

  33. [41]

    Lee, H. N. and Ediger, M. Mechanical rejuvenation in poly (methyl methacrylate) glasses? molecular mobility after deformation. Macromolecules , 43(13):5863--5873, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    Effect of temperature on postyield segmental dynamics of poly (methyl methacrylate) glasses: Thermally activated transitions are important

    Hebert, K., Bending, B., Ricci, J., and Ediger, M. Effect of temperature on postyield segmental dynamics of poly (methyl methacrylate) glasses: Thermally activated transitions are important. Macromolecules , 48(18):6736--6744, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    and Schweizer, K

    Chen, K. and Schweizer, K. S. Molecular theory of physical aging in polymer glasses. Physical Review Letters , 98(16):167802, 2007

    2007

  36. [44]

    and Schweizer, K

    Chen, K. and Schweizer, K. S. Microscopic constitutive equation theory for the nonlinear mechanical response of polymer glasses. Macromolecules , 41(15):5908--5918, 2008

    2008

  37. [45]

    and Schweizer, K

    Chen, K. and Schweizer, K. S. Theory of aging, rejuvenation, and the nonequilibrium steady state in deformed polymer glasses. Physical Review E , 82(4):041804, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    and Schweizer, K

    Chen, K. and Schweizer, K. S. Theory of yielding, strain softening, and steady plastic flow in polymer glasses under constant strain rate deformation. Macromolecules , 44(10):3988--4000, 2011

    2011

  39. [47]

    A., Xing, E., Ediger, M

    Medvedev, G. A., Xing, E., Ediger, M. D., and Caruthers, J. M. Multistep deformation experiment and development of a model for the mechanical behavior of polymeric glasses. Macromolecules , 55(15):6351--6363, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    and Schweizer, K

    Ghosh, A. and Schweizer, K. S. The role of collective elasticity on activated structural relaxation, yielding, and steady state flow in hard sphere fluids and colloidal suspensions under strong deformation. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 153(19):194502, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis

    Schindelin, J., Arganda Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., and Schmid, B. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods , 9(7):676, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.