Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Geometric Control of Visible Emitter Creation in Hexagonal Boron Nitride by Oblique Ion Irradiation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tilting the ion beam shifts the fluence that maximizes visible emission in thick hBN flakes by roughly two orders of magnitude, while thin flakes show no angle dependence.

desk verdict Solid empirical dataset on angle-dependent defect activation in hBN, but the geometric dilution mechanism in Sec. II D is quantitatively inconsistent with the high-fluence regime. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06693 v1 pith:JOPTJU75 submitted 2026-08-07 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sagar Chowdhury , Bhaveshkumar Kamaliya , Ramachandra Bangari , Caleb Whittier , Joseph Spielbauer , Nabil D. Bassim , Thomas G. Folland , Ravitej Uppu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 78.55.-m79.20.Rf61.80.Jh
keywords ionirradiationhexagonalboronnitridephotoluminescencedefectengineeringincidenceanglecollisioncascadesputteringvanderWaalsmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the angle at which heavy ions strike hexagonal boron nitride is itself a processing control for activating visible-light emitters. In flakes thicker than the ion penetration depth, irradiating at 30–60 degrees from normal shifts the fluence that produces the brightest photoluminescence from about $2.5\times10^{14}$ to $2.5$\textendash$5\times10^{16}$ ions/cm$^2$, a nearly 100-fold change, while in thin flakes the optimum fluence stays fixed. The authors trace this to two geometric effects: oblique impacts spread the collision cascade over a larger lateral area, lowering the areal defect density generated per ion, and they also sputter away material faster, truncating the window in which emitters can accumulate. Ion-trajectory simulations and atomic force microscopy support the picture, with the PL maximum coinciding with a fluence regime where the flake swells before milling takes over.

What carries the argument

The central object is the projected collision cascade: the lateral spread and depth-projected range of Xe$^+$ ions in hBN, computed with a Monte Carlo ion-matter interaction code. The quantity that carries the argument is the through-thickness-integrated areal vacancy density, approximated as vacancies per ion divided by $\pi(\Delta R_{\rm lat})^2/\cos\theta$, which falls by factors of about 13 at 30$^\circ$ and 64 at 60$^\circ$ relative to normal incidence; together with the simulated sputter yield, this sets both the fluence needed to reach a given local emitter density and the fluence at which milling removes it. The complementary experimental machinery is integrated photoluminescence per 2 $\mu$m$\times$2 $\mu$m box as the activation readout and AFM Z-height as the morphology readout, which together identify swelling near $10^{14}$ ions/cm$^2$ as the regime where the PL maximum sits.

What would settle it

Measure the absolute density of activated emitters at the PL-optimum fluences for 0$^\circ$ and 60$^\circ$ on a thick flake by correlating single-defect counting or cross-sectional electron microscopy with the PL maps, and compare after normalizing by the retained hBN volume from AFM; if the angle-dependent optimum disappears under this normalization, the claimed 100-fold shift in activation fluence is a collection artifact of morphology rather than a change in defect-creation efficiency.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ion-incidence geometry, not just ion species, energy, or fluence, controls the activation of visible emitters in hBN. For a 240 nm flake, oblique Xe$^+$ irradiation at 30$^\circ$ and 60$^\circ$ requires a fluence roughly two orders of magnitude higher than normal incidence to maximize visible photoluminescence, whereas a 40 nm flake shows an angle-independent optimum near $10^{14}$ ions/cm$^2$. The mechanism is geometric: tilting leaves the total vacancy yield per ion nearly unchanged (about 503–506 vacancies per ion) but compresses the cascade toward the surface and spreads it laterally, reducing the through-thickness-integrated areal defect density by factors of roughly 13 at 30$^\circ$ and 64 at 60$^\circ$; the simulated sputter yield also rises from 3.68 to 6.91 to 22.8 atoms per ion at 0$^\circ$, 30$^\circ$, and 60$^\circ$, which bounds the upper end of the useful fluence window. Time-resolved photoluminescence shows the same biexponential lifetimes for normal and oblique incidence, so the angle redistributes a common family of defect states rather than creating a new emitter species, and annealing reveals an angle-dependent bias between cyan and green-yellow emission bands. The paper concludes that incidence angle is a mask-free, materials-level knob for programming defect density, depth profile, and spectral balance.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the integrated photoluminescence from each irradiated box is a faithful measure of the density of activated emitters, unaffected by the swelling, roughening, and thinning that atomic force microscopy shows across the same fluence range.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Incidence angle becomes a practical tuning knob for emitter density: oblique irradiation can dilute the areal defect density per ion without changing ion species or beam energy.
  • The useful defect-creation window is bounded by swelling and sputter-driven milling, so AFM height measurements can predict the fluence range that will produce bright visible emission on a given flake.
  • Flake thickness acts as a second control parameter: thin flakes lose the angle dependence because ions and milling reach the substrate, making the geometric dilution effect ineffective.
  • Post-irradiation annealing after oblique irradiation preferentially preserves green-yellow emission, offering a geometry-dependent way to bias the spectral composition of a common defect family.
  • Because the angle sets the depth and lateral extent of the damaged volume, oblique irradiation can help position emitters relative to planar photonic structures that require specific emitter depths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the geometric dilution picture is correct, the same angle-dependent fluence shift should appear for other heavy ions of similar range, whereas light ions with deeper penetration would show a suppressed effect; this is a testable prediction the paper does not make explicitly.
  • The coincidence of the PL maximum with the swelling onset suggests that strain or lattice disorder, not just vacancy density, may participate in activating emission; a direct measurement of local strain versus emitter density could separate these contributions.
  • Since the lateral cascade spread is roughly isotropic, combining oblique irradiation with pre-patterned masks could create graded lateral emitter densities in a single exposure, a route the paper leaves implicit.
  • Extending the measurements to single-defect spectroscopy at fixed fluence below the optimum could test whether the angle shifts only emitter density or also changes the depth distribution of emitters available for Purcell enhancement in photonic cavities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of visible photoluminescence (PL) activation in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) flakes irradiated with 30 keV Xe+ ions at normal, 30°, and 60° incidence. For thick flakes (130–240 nm), the ion fluence that maximizes integrated visible PL shifts from ~2.5×10^14 ions/cm^2 at normal incidence to ~2.5–5×10^16 ions/cm^2 at oblique incidence, a shift of nearly two orders of magnitude; thin flakes (40 nm) show a largely angle-independent optimum near 10^14 ions/cm^2. TRIM/Iradina simulations show angle-dependent lateral cascade spreading and increased sputter yields, and AFM measurements identify swelling, thinning, and substrate-milling regimes. Spectrally resolved PL, time-resolved PL, and post-irradiation annealing are used to argue that oblique incidence preserves the same broad defect family while shifting its relative populations. The paper's central claim is that incidence angle is a geometric control parameter for defect activation in van der Waals materials.

Significance. The empirical dataset is a strength: PL maps across 22 doses, three incidence angles, and several flake thicknesses, combined with correlative AFM, provide a systematic picture that is not common in the hBN defect-engineering literature. The observation that incident angle can shift the optimal activation fluence by ~100× in thick flakes is novel and potentially useful for photonic integration, and the paper does not fit any parameter to the fluence-shift data. However, the mechanistic explanation—that lateral redistribution of the collision cascade dilutes the areal defect density per ion and thereby shifts the required fluence—is quantitatively not supported at the fluences used in the experiments. The paper also acknowledges that the calculated 13× dilution at 30° cannot explain the observed ~100× shift and appeals qualitatively to sputtering. Because the cascade-overlap argument is central to the abstract, introduction, and conclusions, the manuscript needs substantial revision before the mechanistic claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.D, Table S2] The geometric-dilution mechanism is not operative at the experimental fluences. For uniform irradiation at fluence Φ, the expected depth-integrated areal density of vacancies is Φ·N_v, which is independent of the lateral cascade width; the paper's use of N_v/(πΔR_lat^2/cosθ) as a per-ion 'projected areal vacancy density' implicitly assumes isolated, non-overlapping cascades. At the normal-incidence PL optimum, Φ = 2.5×10^14 cm^-2 gives a nominal ion spacing of ~0.63 nm, already smaller than the reported ΔR_lat of 3.0 nm, and at the 60° optimum Φ = 2.5×10^16 cm^-2 the spacing is ~0.063 nm against ΔR_lat = 20.6 nm. The coverage fraction Φ·A_XY is ~70 at the 0° optimum and ~7×10^5 at the 60° optimum. In this regime the average damage density is set by Φ·N_v, with N_v ≈ 505 for all angles (Table S2), so lateral spreading cannot lower the mean through-thickness vacancy density by factors of 13 or 64. The central explanation for the fluence shift is therefore quantitatively unsupported; it should be replaced by a model that includes cascade overlap and possibly local-dose saturation, or the fluence shift should be presented as an empirical observation without attributing it to lateral redistribution.
  2. [Section II.D, Figure 5(b)] Even if one accepts the sputtering contribution, the paper does not quantitatively account for the 30° case. The computed lateral dilution factor is only ~13, the sputter-yield increase is 6.91/3.68 ≈ 1.9, and at the 30° optimum (2.5–5×10^16 ions/cm^2) the estimated milling depth is ~17–34 nm for a flake of 130 or 240 nm thickness. Combining these factors does not reach the observed ~100× shift in optimal fluence. The statement that 'the additional influence of material removal contributes' to the larger-than-predicted shift is qualitative; a quantitative model, or at least a clear scaling argument, is needed before the proposed two-mechanism explanation can be regarded as established.
  3. [Section II.A and Section II.E] The use of integrated PL intensity as a proxy for activated emitter density is potentially confounded by the morphological changes documented in the same samples. The paper reports that the PL maximum coincides with the swelling fluence, and at oblique incidence the optimum lies in a regime with measurable sputter thinning; AFM shows milling depths up to ~140 nm at the highest fluences. Swelling, roughening, and thinning can change the collection efficiency, the emitting volume, and the local optical interference condition—the paper itself notes Fabry–Pérot interference in the thicker flake—so the apparent fluence shift could arise in part from morphology-dependent optical artifacts rather than from a true change in defect creation efficiency. I ask for a control or quantitative correction, for example PL normalized by remaining hBN volume, cross-section measurements, or a demonstration that the PL optimum is insensitive to these morphology changes at fixed defect density.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.D] The text refers to 'Figure 4(a)' and 'Figure 4(b)' when discussing the TRIM results; these should be 'Figure 5(a)' and 'Figure 5(b)'.
  2. [Figure 1(b) caption] The caption contains a redundant sentence: 'The distribution of vacancy defect states in hBN is illustrated by their atomic lattice configurations relative to their emission wavelengths. Different defect states in hBN with respect to their emission wavelengths.' This should be reduced to a single clear sentence.
  3. [Figure 7 caption] The word 'irrdiated' should be 'irradiated'.
  4. [Methods (time-resolved PL)] The sentence 'The IRF was independently measured across the visible spectral range using a tunable, spectrally filtered supercontinuum source generated from the same excitation laser' is confusing because the excitation source is described as a Ti:sapphire laser, not a supercontinuum source; please clarify the relationship between the two sources.
  5. [Section II.B] The statement that 'the effects of incidence angle and absolute fluence are therefore not fully separable' is important and well placed, but the same caveat should be applied to the annealing and TRPL comparisons, where the spectra are also acquired at geometry-specific fluences.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental fluence shift is independently measured, and the TRIM/AFM mechanistic inputs are not fitted to reproduce it.

full rationale

The paper's central result, the angle- and thickness-dependent fluence for maximum integrated PL (Fig. 2b, Sec. II A), is a direct experimental observation. The mechanistic account in Sec. II D uses TRIM/Iradina simulations parameterized by published displacement energies [51,52] and by the beam geometry; none of these parameters are fitted to the PL data. The claimed reductions in projected areal vacancy density (13x at 30 degrees, 64x at 60 degrees) follow from the simulated lateral straggle and geometry via A_XY ~ pi(DeltaR_lat)^2/cos(theta), and the paper explicitly acknowledges that the 30-degree reduction is smaller than the observed nearly two-order-of-magnitude shift, attributing the remainder to sputter erosion measured independently by AFM. The AFM morphology measurements in Sec. II E are likewise independent of the PL optimization; the statement that the PL maximum coincides with the swelling regime is a correlation, not a fitted construction. Self-citations (refs. 33, 34, 36, 41) appear only in background or acknowledgment contexts and are not load-bearing. No step equates a fitted parameter with a prediction, imports a uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work, or smuggles an ansatz in via self-citation. The quantitative concern about cascade overlap at the experimental fluences is a scientific correctness issue, not a circularity issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, no new defect species, and no fitted parameters. It relies on standard material parameters from prior literature, such as displacement energies and hBN density, and on the TRIM simulation framework. The main unstated cost is the validity of the bulk-TRIM model and the comparability of flakes across thicknesses.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TRIM binary collision approximation with a bulk amorphous hBN target captures the angle-dependent cascade geometry.
    Section II D uses TRIM to provide range, lateral spread, and sputter yield. Section II E acknowledges that the simulations treat hBN as a bulk amorphous target and do not capture its layered structure.
  • domain assumption Displacement energies E_d(B)=19.36 eV and E_d(N)=23.06 eV from monolayer DFT transfer to the exfoliated few-layer and bulk flakes.
    Section II D states these values come from first-principles molecular-dynamics calculations for pristine, charge-neutral monolayer hBN. The paper argues the relative angle-dependent trends are insensitive to the precise choice.
  • domain assumption The integrated PL signal across the four selected wavelengths (491, 526, 566, 623 nm) is a representative measure of optical defect activation.
    Section II A uses the PL signal integrated over each irradiated area as a measure of optical defect activation, described as robust to local optical inhomogeneity, without detailed validation of spectral coverage.
  • domain assumption The ion fluence delivered to each region is proportional to the exposure time at constant beam current over the 0.6 ms to 160 s range.
    The Methods section states that dose was controlled by exposure time. Any beam current drift or dwell-time nonlinearity would distort the fluence axis and the inferred optimal fluence.
  • domain assumption The exfoliated flakes of different thicknesses have comparable impurity and pre-existing defect content.
    Section II B notes ppm-level carbon impurity in commercial crystals. The thickness-dependent comparison assumes differences come from geometry rather than from chemical variation between flakes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric Control of Visible Emitter Creation in Hexagonal Boron Nitride by Oblique Ion Irradiation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JOPTJU75

@misc{pith2026260806693,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric Control of Visible Emitter Creation in Hexagonal Boron Nitride by Oblique Ion Irradiation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JOPTJU75}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06693}
}
read the original abstract

Ion irradiation creates optically active defects in wide-bandgap van der Waals materials, yet most approaches tune defect formation by varying the ion species, energy, or fluence while leaving the incidence geometry fixed. The ion-incidence angle is established here as a geometric control parameter for engineering visible emitters in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). The angle and ion fluence of a plasma-focused heavy-ion (Xe+) beam are varied across hBN flakes of different thickness, and the resulting photoluminescence is quantified. In thick flakes, oblique irradiation shifts the fluence for maximum emission by nearly two orders of magnitude relative to normal incidence, whereas thin flakes exhibit an angle-independent optimum. Ion-trajectory simulations attribute this thickness dependence to lateral redistribution of the collision cascade and enhanced oblique sputtering. Atomic force microscopy identifies distinct processing regimes that delineate the useful defect-creation window. Post-irradiation annealing quenches the emission and shifts the spectral weight toward the green-yellow band while preserving the angle-dependent activation trends. Spectrally resolved lifetime measurements show comparable biexponential dynamics for normal and oblique incidence, consistent with emission from related defect families rather than a geometry-specific emitter species. These results establish ion-incidence geometry as a materials-level knob for programming optical defect activation and spatial defect distributions in van der Waals photonic materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06693 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) shows the mean of the fitted τ2 values across a 50 nm span at each central wavelength, cor￾responding to 25 non-overlapping 2 nm bands; the error￾bars represent the standard deviation. Across the visible spectrum, both irradiation geometries yield characteris￾tic l…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Weber, W

    J. Weber, W. Koehl, J. Varley, A. Janotti, B. Buck- ley, C. Van de Walle, and D. D. Awschalom, Quan- tum computing with defects, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 8513 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Atat¨ ure, D

    M. Atat¨ ure, D. Englund, N. Vamivakas, S.-Y. Lee, and J. Wrachtrup, Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies, Nature Reviews Materials3, 38 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Wolfowicz, F

    G. Wolfowicz, F. J. Heremans, C. P. Anderson, S. Kanai, H. Seo, A. Gali, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Quan- tum guidelines for solid-state spin defects, Nature Re- views Materials6, 906–925 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    M. E. Bathen and L. Vines, Manipulating single-photon emission from point defects in diamond and silicon carbide, Advanced Quantum Technologies4, 2100003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    C ¸ akan, C

    A. C ¸ akan, C. Cholsuk, A. Gale, M. Kianinia, S. Pa¸ cal, S. Ate¸ s, I. Aharonovich, M. Toth, and T. Vogl, Quantum optics applications of hexagonal boron nitride defects, Advanced Optical Materials13, 2402508 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    L. C. Bassett, A. Alkauskas, A. L. Exarhos, and K. C. Fu, Quantum defects by design, Nanophotonics8, 1867–1888 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Kianinia, Z.-Q

    M. Kianinia, Z.-Q. Xu, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum emitters in 2d materials: Emitter engineer- ing, photophysics, and integration in photonic nanostruc- tures, Applied Physics Reviews9, 011306 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    S. Hou, H. Hu, M. Xu, J. Zhang, H. Xiao, Z. Liu, W. Xing, X. Liu, S. You, B. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. Yu, Z. Xie, X. He, J. Zhang, and Y. Hao, Engineering quantum emit- ters in 2d materials, Advanced Optical Materials13, 2500693 (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    S.-T. M. Akkanen, H. A. Fernandez, and Z. Sun, Optical modification of 2d materials: methods and applications, Advanced Materials34, 2110152 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    A. R.-P. Montblanch, M. Barbone, I. Aharonovich, M. Atat¨ ure, and A. C. Ferrari, Layered materials as a platform for quantum technologies, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy18, 555 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    A. W. Elshaari, A. Skalli, S. Gyger, M. Nurizzo, L. Schweickert, I. Esmaeil Zadeh, M. Svedendahl, S. Steinhauer, and V. Zwiller, Deterministic integration of hbn emitter in silicon nitride photonic waveguide, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies4, 2100032 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    C. Li, J. E. Fr¨ och, M. Nonahal, T. N. Tran, M. Toth, S. Kim, and I. Aharonovich, Integration of hbn quantum emitters in monolithically fabricated waveguides, ACS Photonics8, 2966–2972 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Parto, S

    K. Parto, S. I. Azzam, N. Lewis, S. D. Patel, S. Umezawa, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and G. Moody, Cavity- enhanced 2d material quantum emitters deterministically integrated with silicon nitride microresonators, Nano Let- ters22, 9748–9756 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    S. I. Azzam, K. Parto, and G. Moody, Purcell enhance- ment and polarization control of single-photon emit- ters in monolayer wse 2 using dielectric nanoantennas, Nanophotonics12, 477–484 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    J. D. Caldwell, I. Aharonovich, G. Cassabois, J. H. Edgar, B. Gil, and D. N. Basov, Photonics with hexag- onal boron nitride, Nature Reviews Materials4, 552 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Toledo, D

    J. Toledo, D. B. de Jesus, M. Kianinia, A. Leal, C. Fan- tini, L. Cury, G. S´ afar, I. Aharonovich, and K. Kram- brock, Electron paramagnetic resonance signature of point defects in neutron-irradiated hexagonal boron ni- tride, Physical Review B98, 155203 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Kianinia, S

    M. Kianinia, S. White, J. E. Fr¨ och, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Generation of spin defects in hexagonal 12 boron nitride, ACS Photonics7, 2147 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Liang, Y

    H. Liang, Y. Chen, C. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Eda, and A. A. Bettiol, High sensitivity spin defects in hbn created by high-energy he beam irradiation, Ad- vanced Optical Materials11, 2201941 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Glushkov, M

    E. Glushkov, M. Macha, E. R¨ ath, V. Navikas, N. Ron- ceray, C. Y. Cheon, A. Ahmed, A. Avsar, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, I. Shorubalko, A. Kis, G. Fantner, and A. Radenovic, Engineering optically active defects in hexagonal boron nitride using focused ion beam and water, ACS...

    2022

  12. [20]

    A. Gale, C. Li, Y. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Site-specific fabrication of blue quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics9, 2170 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Y.-T. Wu, X. Guo, P.-T. Jing, G.-L. Liu, Z. Cheng, J.- L. Xu, Y. Bao, H. Xu, L.-G. Zhang, D. Zhan,et al., Site-controlled carbon implantation for quantum emit- ter engineering in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces17, 64864 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Carbone, I

    A. Carbone, I. D. Breev, J. Figueiredo, S. Kretschmer, L. Geilen, A. Ben Mhenni, J. Arceri, A. V. Krashenin- nikov, M. Wubs, A. W. Holleitner,et al., Quantifying the creation of negatively charged boron vacancies in he- ion irradiated hexagonal boron nitride, Physical Review M...

    2025

  15. [23]

    N.-J. Guo, W. Liu, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, X.-D. Zeng, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.- S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Generation of spin defects by ion implantation in hexag- onal boron nitride, ACS Omega7, 1733–1739 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Venturi, S

    G. Venturi, S. Chiodini, N. Melchioni, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, C. Ronning, and A. Ambrosio, Selective genera- tion of luminescent defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Laser & Photonics Reviews18, 2300973 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Valerius, C

    P. Valerius, C. Herbig, M. Will, M. A. Arman, J. Knud- sen, V. Caciuc, N. Atodiresei, and T. Michely, Anneal- ing of ion-irradiated hexagonal boron nitride on ir (111), Physical Review B96, 235410 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Suzuki, Y

    T. Suzuki, Y. Yamazaki, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Nishiya, Y.-i. Matsushita, K. Harii, Y. Masuyama, Y. Hijikata, and T. Ohshima, Spin property improvement of boron vacancy defect in hexagonal boron nitride by thermal treatment, Applied Physics Express16, 032006 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    H¨ oflich, G

    K. H¨ oflich, G. Hobler, F. I. Allen, T. Wirtz, G. Rius, L. McElwee-White, A. V. Krasheninnikov, M. Schmidt, I. Utke, N. Klingner, M. Osenberg, R. C´ ordoba, F. Djurabekova, I. Manke, P. Moll, M. Manoccio, J. M. De Teresa, L. Bischoff, J. Michler, O. De Cas- tro, A. Delobbe, P...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Mendelson, D

    N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, J. R. Reimers, T. S. Cheng, A. Gottscholl, H. Long, C. J. Mellor, A. Zettl, V. Dyakonov, P. H. Beton,et al., Identifying carbon as the source of visible single-photon emission from hexag- onal boron nitride, Nature Materials20, 321 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Huang, M

    P. Huang, M. Grzeszczyk, K. Vaklinova, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, and M. Koperski, Carbon and vacancy centers in hexagonal boron nitride, Physical Review B106, 014107 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Cholsuk, A

    C. Cholsuk, A. Zand, A. undefinedakan, and T. Vogl, The hbn defects database: A theoretical compilation of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C128, 12716–12725 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Z. Qiu, K. Vaklinova, P. Huang, M. Grzeszczyk, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, J. Lu, and M. Koperski, Atomic and electronic structure of defects in hbn: Enhancing single-defect functionalities, ACS Nano18, 24035–24043 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    R. Uppu, F. T. Pedersen, Y. Wang, C. T. Olesen, C. Pa- pon, X. Zhou, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, and P. Lodahl, Scalable integrated single-photon source, Science Advances6, eabc8268 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    F. T. Østfeldt, E. M. Gonz´ alez-Ruiz, N. Hauff, Y. Wang, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, R. Schott, L. Midolo, A. S. Sørensen, R. Uppu, and P. Lodahl, On-demand source of dual-rail photon pairs based on chiral interaction in a nanophotonic waveguide, PRX Quantum3, 020363 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Sortino, A

    L. Sortino, A. Gale, L. K¨ uhner, C. Li, J. Biechteler, F. J. Wendisch, M. Kianinia, H. Ren, M. Toth, S. A. Maier,et al., Optically addressable spin defects coupled to bound states in the continuum metasurfaces, Nature Communications15, 2008 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Chowdhury, Rituraj, S

    S. Chowdhury, Rituraj, S. Krishnamurthy, and V. P. Bhallamudi, Resonant structure for improved direction- ality and extraction of single photons, Journal of Physics: Photonics7, 015009 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Hennessey, B

    M. Hennessey, B. Whitefield, A. Gale, M. Kianinia, J. A. Scott, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Framework for en- gineering of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride by focused ion beams, Advanced Quantum Technologies8, 2300459 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    K. Wittmaack, Effect of surface roughening on secondary ion yields and erosion rates of silicon subject to oblique oxygen bombardment, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A8, 2246 (1990)

    1990

  31. [39]

    A. Vantomme, 50 years of ion channeling in materials sci- ence, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Re- search Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms371, 12 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Y. S. Katharria, S. Kumar, P. S. Lakshmy, D. Kanjilal, and A. T. Sharma, Self-organization of 6h-sic (0001) sur- face under kev ion irradiation, Journal of Applied Physics 102, 044301 (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    Kamaliya, V

    B. Kamaliya, V. Garg, A. C. Liu, Y. Chen, M. Aslam, J. Fu, and R. G. Mote, Tailoring surface self-organization for nanoscale polygonal morphology on germanium, Ad- vanced Materials33, 2008668 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Z. Bai, L. Zhang, and L. Liu, Bombarding graphene with oxygen ions: combining effects of incident angle and ion energy to control defect generation, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry C119, 26793 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Z. Bai, L. Zhang, H. Li, and L. Liu, Nanopore creation in graphene by ion beam irradiation: geometry, quality, and efficiency, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces8, 24803 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Z. Bai, L. Zhang, and L. Liu, Improving low-energy boron/nitrogen ion implantation in graphene by ion bom- bardment at oblique angles, Nanoscale8, 8761 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    S. Li, P. Li, and A. Gali, Native antisite defects in 13 ¡i¿h¡/i¿-bn, Applied Physics Letters126, 062104 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    T. T. Tran, K. Bray, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers, Nature Nanotechnology11, 37–41 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    T. T. Tran, C. Elbadawi, D. Totonjian, C. J. Lobo, G. Grosso, H. Moon, D. R. Englund, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Nano10, 7331–7338 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Maciaszek and L

    M. Maciaszek and L. Razinkovas, Blue quantum emitter in hexagonal boron nitride and a carbon chain tetramer: a first-principles study, ACS Applied Nano Materials7, 18979 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    T. W. Tang, R. Ritika, M. Tamtaji, H. Liu, Y. Hu, Z. Liu, P. R. Galligan, M. Xu, J. Shen, J. Wang, J. You, Y. Li, G. Chen, I. Aharonovich, and Z. Luo, Structured-defect engineering of hexagonal boron nitride for identified vis- ible single-photon emitters, ACS Nano19, 8509–8519 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Ren and Z

    F. Ren and Z. Xu, Atomistic simulations of carbon im- plantation into hbn for creating color centers, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry C129, 5054–5064 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    Kotakoski, C

    J. Kotakoski, C. H. Jin, O. Lehtinen, K. Suenaga, and A. V. Krasheninnikov, Electron knock-on damage in hexagonal boron nitride monolayers, Physical Review B 82, 113404 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    T. A. Bui, G. T. Leuthner, J. Madsen, M. R. A. Mon- azam, A. I. Chirita, A. Postl, C. Mangler, J. Kotakoski, and T. Susi, Creation of single vacancies in hbn with electron irradiation, Small19, 2301926 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    F. Ren, Y. Wu, and Z. Xu, Creation and repair of lumi- nescence defects in hexagonal boron nitride by irradiation and annealing for optical neutron detection, Journal of Luminescence261, 119911 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Grosso, H

    G. Grosso, H. Moon, B. Lienhard, S. Ali, D. K. Efe- tov, M. M. Furchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and D. Englund, Tunable and high- purity room temperature single-photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Com- munications8, 705 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Kumar, C

    A. Kumar, C. Cholsuk, A. Zand, M. N. Mishuk, T. Matthes, F. Eilenberger, S. Suwanna, and T. Vogl, Lo- calized creation of yellow single photon emitting carbon complexes in hexagonal boron nitride, APL Materials11, 071108 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    J. C. Stewart, Y. Fan, J. S. H. Danial, A. Goetz, A. S. Prasad, O. J. Burton, J. A. Alexander-Webber, S. F. Lee, S. M. Skoff, V. Babenko, and S. Hofmann, Quantum emitter localization in layer-engineered hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Nano15, 13591–13603 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.