Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 107 references

Giant-exchange-driven Vectorial Control of a Minimal Topological Magnet in Eu3In2As4

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Eu3In2As4 is a minimal Weyl semimetal whose single pair of Weyl nodes can be steered by rotating the magnetization, driven by exchange coupling that shifts bands by up to 300 meV.

desk verdict The experimental band-shift data are strong, but the as-grown crystals sit at a Fermi level away from the predicted Weyl nodes, so the 'minimal Weyl semimetal' is a prediction, not a realized state. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06737 v1 pith:32YGT4DX submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Haonan Chen , Xunkai Duan , Guangyi Wang , Yuhan Du , Huayao Li , Jiayu Wang , Wenbin Wu , Zixuan Xu
show 8 more authors
Yingchao Xia Jiaming Gu Pengliang Leng Lin Miao Fengfeng Zhu Xiang Yuan Tong Zhou Cheng Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords exchangecouplingidealWeylsemimetaltopologicalphasetransitionmagnetEu3In2As4spin-flopmagneto-infraredspectroscopyanomalousHalleffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the layered Zintl compound Eu3In2As4 combines a giant exchange coupling between localized Eu2+ moments and itinerant electrons with a soft, easily rotated magnetization. The authors identify magnetization-dependent band shifts of up to 300 meV, far beyond ordinary Zeeman scales, and use them to map a sequence of magnetic phases: an antiferromagnetic topological-insulator ground state, a proposed 2/3-ferrimagnetic intermediate phase, and fully polarized states. In the fully polarized phase the compound is predicted to be a minimal Weyl semimetal, hosting a single pair of Weyl nodes with no extraneous bands at the Fermi level. The paper argues that rotating the magnetization direction moves the Weyl nodes in momentum space, making Eu3In2As4 a platform for vectorial control of topological band structure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the spin-only Heisenberg exchange between localized Eu2+ 4f7 moments (S = 7/2, L = 0) and itinerant carriers, Hex = -2Jex Σ si·Si. Under a mean-field approximation the exchange-induced band shift is proportional to the reduced magnetization M(T,B)/Msat, so that measured optical transition energies obey ΔE = -(1/2) Jeff S M/Msat; this proportionality is the identity that converts magnetization curves into predicted band-structure changes. A secondary structural ingredient is the presence of two inequivalent Eu sublattices with multiplicity ratio 2:1, which is used to propose a sequential polarization scenario in which the larger sublattice polarizes first, producing an intermediate 2/3-ferrimagnetic phase before the second sublattice flops.

What would settle it

Neutron diffraction on a single crystal at 1.8 K with field along the a-axis near the 2/3-Msat plateau would settle the intermediate phase: if the Eu1 sublattice is fully polarized while Eu2 retains antiferromagnetic order the sequential scenario holds, whereas simultaneous canting of both sublattices with no distinct plateau would invalidate it; separately, angle-resolved photoemission on the fully polarized state should reveal exactly one Weyl pair at the predicted kx-ky momenta, with any extra Fermi-surface crossings or trivial pockets refuting the minimal-Weyl claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a material in which exchange coupling, rather than external field strength, dominates the electronic structure: aligning the Eu2+ moments with fields of about 1 T shifts optical transition energies by hundreds of meV, and this exchange-driven reconstruction transforms the ground state from an axion-insulator-like antiferromagnet into a semimetal. When the moments are fully polarized along the a or b axis, first-principles calculations show exactly one pair of Weyl nodes in the kx-ky plane, with no trivial bands crossing the Fermi level, the minimal Weyl configuration possible. Magnetization along c instead stabilizes an ideal nodal-ring semimetal. The paper further claims that because the magnetism is soft and isotropic, rotating the magnetization continuously moves the Weyl nodes' positions and separation, so the topology can be controlled by the direction as well as the magnitude of the applied field. The experimental evidence—magneto-infrared shifts that scale linearly with magnetization, anisotropic magnetoresistance, Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations with a π-Berry phase, and an anomalous Hall conductivity consistent with the calculated Berry curvature—is presented as consistent confirmation of this exchange-driven evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The proposed 2/3-ferrimagnetic phase rests on the assumption that the two Eu sublattices polarize one after the other, an inference from magnetization derivatives that has not been confirmed by neutron diffraction or another magnetic-structure probe.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fields of about 1 T fully polarize the moments along any axis, so both the magnitude and the orientation of an applied field can switch the material among its insulating, intermediate, Weyl, and nodal-ring phases.
  • The Weyl phase has a single pair of nodes and no trivial bands at the Fermi level, offering a clean stage for testing Weyl physics such as the predicted relation between the anomalous Hall conductance and node separation.
  • Rotating the magnetization within the ab-plane moves the Weyl nodes along the kx-ky plane while preserving the Weyl semimetal, providing vectorial, in-situ tunability of Berry curvature and node separation.
  • Because the exchange splitting tracks magnetization, heating also reshapes the Fermi pocket, explaining the observed rise in the Shubnikov-de Haas frequency from 2 K to 20 K.
  • The L=0 spin-only moment, soft magnetism, and proximity of the magnetic ions to the conductive In-As framework are identified as the material-specific reasons the exchange coupling is both strong and easily steered.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the sequential polarization of the two Eu sublattices is confirmed by neutron diffraction, the 2/3-FiMa plateau becomes a rare example of a ferrimagnet whose intermediate state is defined by sublattice-selective polarization, which could be engineered in other Eu-Zintl compounds with inequivalent sites.
  • Beyond the paper: the linear M-scaling of optical transition energies could serve as a fast spectroscopic screening criterion to identify other low-carrier-density magnets with comparably giant exchange coupling, before expensive transport or photoemission studies.
  • Beyond the paper: the predicted rotation of Weyl node positions suggests that epitaxial strain or exchange bias from an adjacent magnetic layer could emulate field rotation, enabling non-volatile control of topology in devices without a rotating magnet.
  • Beyond the paper: the authors' note that transport near charge neutrality is still missing implies that gated nanowires, grown by the reported topotaxial method, could access the Weyl points directly and test the predicted (e2/2πh)Δk form of the intrinsic anomalous Hall effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined experimental and DFT study of the magnetic topological material Eu3In2As4. It claims that the compound exhibits exchange-driven band shifts up to ~300 meV, which it interprets as a giant exchange coupling between Eu 4f moments and itinerant carriers. From magnetization, magneto-infrared spectroscopy, anisotropic magnetoresistance, Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations, and anomalous Hall effect, together with DFT+U and Wannier-based band-structure calculations, the paper constructs a field-temperature phase diagram that includes an AFM topological-insulator ground state, a proposed 2/3-ferrimagnetic intermediate phase, and fully polarized FM states predicted to host a minimal Weyl semimetal with a single pair of Weyl nodes, or a nodal-ring semimetal for magnetization along c. The paper argues that the momentum-space positions of the Weyl nodes can be tuned by rotating the magnetization direction.

Significance. If the central claims hold, Eu3In2As4 would be a valuable platform: it combines a simple, nearly isotropic Fermi surface with a very large exchange-driven band reconstruction and soft magnetism, which are rarely found together. The paper deserves credit for the breadth of independent measurements (magnetization, magneto-IR, AMR, SdH, AHE) that mutually support exchange-driven band reconstruction, and for being explicit in the Conclusions that the topological assignments rely primarily on calculations and that direct Weyl-cone spectroscopy and Fermi-level tuning remain future work. The DFT calculations are also reported with concrete parameters and verified with WannierTools. However, two load-bearing points — the experimental Fermi level relative to the predicted Weyl nodes, and the inference of the 2/3-FiMa phase from magnetization derivatives alone — currently leave the headline 'minimal Weyl semimetal' as a prediction at a different filling rather than a demonstrated property of the as-grown crystals.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.4] The SdH analysis places the experimental Fermi level approximately 0.155 eV above the DFT Fermi energy, which the authors state is above the Lifshitz transition. In the same section they note that the measured AHE is insensitive to Weyl-cone evolution 'likely due to the high electron density and the large Fermi pocket being away from the Weyl points.' This is an internal mismatch between the claimed realized minimal-Weyl state and the measured doping: the transport and quantum-oscillation data are dominated by a large electron pocket that is not at the Weyl nodes. The abstract's statement that the fully polarized state 'is predicted to host either Weyl or nodal-ring semimetals' is careful, but the paper's title, abstract, and Section 2.1 nevertheless present the material as if the minimal Weyl phase were realized. This mismatch should be reframed as a prediction requiring Fermi-level tuning toward charge neutrality, or the authors must provide evidence that the measured Fermi level nevertheless samples the Weyl physics in a meaningful way.
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (3)] Equation (3) is used to extract effective exchange constants Jeff from the slopes of transition-energy versus magnetization curves, and the same data are then presented as evidence that the transition energies scale linearly with M. This is partly circular: the linear scaling is assumed from the mean-field Heisenberg model, not independently predicted. Moreover, the approximately 500 meV exchange splitting for the middle band is obtained from the simplified three-band assignment of Tα, Tβ, Tγ to LB→MB and LB→UB transitions, which is an ad-hoc model that neglects SOC and antiferromagnetic exchange. The paper should clearly state which parts of the 'scaling' are fits, and ideally validate the assignment with a different probe (e.g., temperature dependence, doping series, or comparison at two geometries) or by explicitly showing that alternative assignments are excluded.
  3. [§2.1, Figure 1g] The proposed 2/3-FiMa intermediate phase is load-bearing for the topological-evolution narrative (AFM TI → FiM → FM Weyl), but its microscopic spin configuration is inferred only from magnetization and derivative analyses. The authors acknowledge that a definitive determination would require neutron diffraction or related probes. In the absence of such a determination, the phase diagram in Figure 1g is not established beyond speculation. The DFT support in Table S3 uses a specific collinear configuration and Ueff = 7 eV, which does not by itself establish that the real material realizes sequential polarization of Eu1 then Eu2. This caveat should be moved from a sentence to a clearly visible limitation, and the word 'proposed' should be used consistently throughout the abstract and main text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2] The notation for the exchange constant is inconsistent: Equation (1) defines Jex, while Equation (3) and the surrounding text use Jeff; the definition of Jeff as the 'net exchange contribution of the two participating bands' should be stated more explicitly and used consistently.
  2. [§2.1] The phase labels cAFM-1 and cAFM-2 are introduced in the text and Figure 1g but are not consistently defined in the figure caption or a table; a short list of all magnetic phases with their distinguishing features would improve readability.
  3. [Figure 4d] The caption states that the Fermi surface is plotted at E-EF = 0.155 eV, which is the value matched to the SdH frequency; however, the main text does not clearly state that this value is an experimental input rather than a DFT prediction, which could mislead readers about the origin of the Fermi-level offset.
  4. [§4] The Conclusions correctly list the limitations, but the abstract and Section 1 do not. For a paper whose central claim is a 'minimal topological magnet,' the abstract should reflect the same degree of caution about the Weyl-phase realization at the actual Fermi level.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The central derivation is self-contained; the only minor circularity is that Eq. (3) is fitted to the same magneto-IR data it is said to predict.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.2, Eq. (3), Figure 2e-f]
    "This relation predicts a linear scaling of transition energies with magnetization rather than with magnetic field itself. The extracted transition energies are plotted in Figure 2e–f for both geometries, where the field-dependent energy shifts of Tα, Tβ, and Tγ are well captured by linear scaling with magnetization (solid shaded curves)."

    Equation (3) introduces an unknown effective exchange constant Jeff and asserts ΔE = -(1/2)JeffS M/Msat. The slopes are then extracted from the same magneto-infrared transitions shown in Fig. 2e-f, so the 'prediction' of linear scaling is not an independent test; a straight line through the same data is forced by the fit. This is a presentational overstatement rather than a constructional circularity of the paper's main claims, since the subsequent 500 meV exchange-scale estimate and the topological phase discussion are consistency checks tied to DFT calculations rather than free parameters fitted to the outcome.

full rationale

The main topological narrative is not circular. The AFMa-to-FM phase evolution and the minimal single-pair Weyl state are obtained from first-principles DFT+U calculations with stated parameters (Ueff=7 eV, PBE, WannierTools), and the transport and optical data are compared to those calculations rather than used to generate them. The Fermi level is matched to the SdH frequency (0.155 eV above DFT EF), and the AHE comparison at that level is a genuine second observable, not the same fit. The paper explicitly concedes in Section 2.4 that the measured AHE is insensitive to Weyl-cone evolution because the Fermi pocket is away from the Weyl points, and the Conclusions state that direct spectroscopic observation of Weyl cones and transport closer to charge neutrality remain future work; this is a self-identified limitation, not a hidden circularity. The 2/3-FiMa intermediate phase is admittedly inferred from magnetization derivatives and requires neutron diffraction, which is weak evidence but not circular reasoning. The only mild circularity is in Section 2.2, where Eq. (3) is fitted to the same magneto-IR data it is said to predict, and the extracted ~500 meV exchange splitting is then used as a 'direct experimental basis' for exchange-driven reconstruction. This is a model interpretation of the data, and the overstatement is minor; it does not drive the central Weyl-node prediction. No load-bearing self-citations were found; cited prior work on Eu3In2As4 (Refs. 45, 46, 94) is external to the author list or does not supply a contested premise. Overall circularity is therefore low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central experimental claim (giant exchange-driven band shifts) is supported by a three-band optical model in which Jeff is fit to the same magneto-IR data that is then cited as evidence. The topological phase assignments rely on DFT+U with a chosen Ueff and on the assumed AFMa and sequential-polarization magnetic structures. No independent magnetic-structure probe or direct Weyl-node spectroscopy is provided. The free parameters listed are therefore genuinely load-bearing: changing Ueff, the three-band assignment, or the sequential polarization assumption could alter the claimed phase diagram.

free parameters (3)
  • Ueff (DFT+U) = 7 eV
    Hubbard U on Eu 4f chosen in Methods 5.4; topological band structure and Weyl node positions depend on this value, but it is not fitted to the experimental data in this paper.
  • Effective exchange constants Jeff for transitions Tα, Tβ, Tγ = Slopes of ΔE vs M/Msat extracted from Figure 2e-f; exact values not tabulated in main text
    Eq. (3) is fitted to magneto-IR data; the linear scaling with M is assumed from mean-field Heisenberg exchange, and Jeff absorbs the net exchange contributions of initial and final bands. This is a fit, not an independent prediction.
  • Experimental Fermi level offset = 0.155 eV above DFT Fermi energy
    Chosen in Section 2.4 by matching the measured SdH frequency F~124 T to the calculated Fermi surface cross-sectional area; this anchors comparisons of AHE and Fermi pocket but is not an independent measurement.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Mean-field Heisenberg exchange model: ΔE = -(1/2) Jeff S M/Msat
    Invoked in Section 2.2, Eqs. (1)-(3), following Refs. [53-55]. It assumes itinerant spins couple isotropically to local Eu2+ spins and that the average spin polarization scales with M/Msat; this is an established model for Eu2+ semiconductors, not derived from first principles in this paper.
  • domain assumption DFT+U with PBE functional and Ueff=7 eV gives reliable band topology for Eu3In2As4
    Methods 5.4; all topological assignments (AFM TI, Weyl, nodal-ring) rest on this computational framework. No comparison to hybrid functionals or GW is reported, so functional dependence is untested.
  • domain assumption AFMa C-type magnetic ground state as calculated by DFT
    Section 2.1: 'Energy calculations identify AFMa as ground state'; susceptibility supports easy a-axis, but no neutron diffraction confirms the proposed C-type AFM order with two sublattices.
  • ad hoc to paper Sequential polarization scenario for Eu1 then Eu2 sublattices
    Section 2.1: the 2/3-FiMa intermediate phase is inferred from dM/dH and d2M/dH2 features; authors state definitive determination requires neutron diffraction. If moments cant collectively rather than sequentially, the intermediate phase assignment fails.
  • ad hoc to paper Simplified three-band optical model assigning Tα, Tβ, Tγ to LB→MB and LB→UB transitions
    Section 2.2 and Figure 2g; the model neglects SOC and antiferromagnetic exchange, which the authors say renormalize details without altering the picture. Peak assignments are not independently verified by band-resolved spectroscopy.
  • standard math Onsager relation and Landau fan analysis for SdH frequency and Berry phase
    Section 2.4; standard quantum-oscillation analysis. Assumes a single isotropic Fermi pocket and that the y-intercept gives the Berry phase, valid for 3D Fermi surfaces under accessible fields.
invented entities (1)
  • 2/3-FiMa intermediate ferrimagnetic phase
    purpose: Explains the two successive magnetization anomalies and divides the H parallel to a phase diagram into AFMa, cAFM-1, 2/3-FiMa, cAFM-2, and FMa phases.
    No neutron or other magnetic-structure probe is provided; inferred from magnetization derivatives only, as authors admit. Could instead be a continuous canting crossover.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Giant-exchange-driven Vectorial Control of a Minimal Topological Magnet in Eu3In2As4." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32YGT4DX

@misc{pith2026260806737,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Giant-exchange-driven Vectorial Control of a Minimal Topological Magnet in Eu3In2As4},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32YGT4DX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06737}
}
read the original abstract

The interplay between magnetism and band topology provides a route to controlling quantum states of matter, yet its realization in materials is often constrained by weak exchange coupling and complex electronic structures. Here, a giant exchange coupling is identified in the newly predicted topological magnet Eu3In2As4, giving rise to magnetization-dependent band shifts of up to 300 meV. Together with its intrinsically soft magnetic response, this strong cou-pling enables systematic tuning of topological phases by both the magnitude and orientation of applied magnetic fields. The magneto-topological phase diagram is mapped out in which an antiferromagnetic topological insulator ground state evolves, under modest fields, into a pro-posed intermediate 2/3-ferrimagnetic phase, and further into fully polarized ferromagnetic states predicted to host either Weyl or nodal-ring semimetals. Notably, the Weyl phase corresponds to a minimal model hosting a single pair of Weyl nodes. Quantum oscillations, anomalous Hall transport and magneto-infrared spectroscopy consistently reveal exchange-driven band recon-struction across these transitions. Rotation of the magnetization theoretically provides an effi-cient means to tune the momentum-space positions and separations of the Weyl nodes. These results establish Eu3In2As4 as a model system for exploring how strong exchange coupling can be used to control topological band structures with minimal complexity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials,

    B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, H. Beidenkopf, “Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials,” Nature 603 (2022): 41–51, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04105-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04105-x 2022

  2. [2]

    Magnetic topological insulators,

    Y . Tokura, K. Yasuda, A. Tsukazaki, “Magnetic topological insulators,” Nature Reviews Physics 1 (2019): 126–143, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-018-0011-5

    doi:10.1038/s42254-018-0011-5 2019

  3. [3]

    The study of magnetic topological semimetals by first principles calculations,

    J. Zou, Z. He, G. Xu, “The study of magnetic topological semimetals by first principles calculations,” npj Computational Materials 5 (2019): 96, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524 - 019-0237-5

    doi:10.1038/s41524 2019

  4. [4]

    Topological Axion States in the Magnetic Insulator MnBi2Te4 with the Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect,

    D. Zhang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, D. Xing, H. Zhang, J. Wang, “Topological Axion States in the Magnetic Insulator MnBi2Te4 with the Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect,” Physical Review Letters 122 (2019): 206401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.206401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.206401 2019

  5. [5]

    Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anoma- lous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator,

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, et al., “Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anoma- lous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator,” Science 340 (2013): 167 –170, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234414

    doi:10.1126/science.1234414 2013

  6. [6]

    Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4,

    Y . Deng, Y . Yu, M. Z. Shi, et al., “Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4,” Science 367 (2020): 895–900, https://doi.org/10.1126/sci- ence.aax8156

    doi:10.1126/sci- 2020

  7. [7]

    Anomalous Hall Effect in Weyl Metals,

    A. A. Burkov, “Anomalous Hall Effect in Weyl Metals,” Physical Review Letters 113 (2014): 187202, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.187202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.187202 2014

  8. [8]

    Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in type -II Weyl semimetals,

    A. A. Zyuzin, R. P. Tiwari, “Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in type -II Weyl semimetals,” JETP Letters 103 (2016): 717–722, https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136401611014X

    work page doi:10.1134/s002136401611014x 2016

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Giant room temperature anomalous Hall effect and tunable topology in a ferromagnetic topological semimetal Co2MnAl,

    P. Li, J. Koo, W. Ning, et al., “Giant room temperature anomalous Hall effect and tunable topology in a ferromagnetic topological semimetal Co2MnAl,” Nature Communications 11 (2020): 3476, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17174-9

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferromagnetic kagome- lattice semimetal,

    E. Liu, Y . Sun, N. Kumar, et al., “Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferromagnetic kagome- lattice semimetal,” Nature Physics 14 (2018): 1125–1131, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567- 018-0234-5

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Strong anomalous Nernst effect in collinear magnetic Weyl semimetals without net magnetic moments,

    J. Noky, J. Gayles, C. Felser, Y . Sun, “Strong anomalous Nernst effect in collinear magnetic Weyl semimetals without net magnetic moments,” Physical Review B 97 (2018): 220405(R), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.220405

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Large anomalous Nernst effect at room tempera- ture in a chiral antiferromagnet,

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, et al., “Large anomalous Nernst effect at room tempera- ture in a chiral antiferromagnet,” Nature Physics 13 (2017): 1085 –1090, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4181. 15 / 26

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Giant anomalous Nernst effect and quantum- critical scaling in a ferromagnetic semimetal,

    A. Sakai, Y . P. Mizuta, A. A. Nugroho, et al., “Giant anomalous Nernst effect and quantum- critical scaling in a ferromagnetic semimetal,” Nature Physics 14 (2018): 1119 –1124, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0225-6

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Giant anomalous Nernst signal in the antiferromagnet YbMnBi2,

    Y . Pan, C. Le, B. He, et al., “Giant anomalous Nernst signal in the antiferromagnet YbMnBi2,” Nature Materials 21 (2022): 203–209, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01149-2

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Tunable positions of Weyl nodes via magnetism and pres- sure in the ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi,

    E. Cheng, L. Yan, X. Shi, et al., “Tunable positions of Weyl nodes via magnetism and pres- sure in the ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 1467, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45658-5

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Colossal negative magnetoresistance in field-induced Weyl semimetal of magnetic half-Heusler compound,

    K. Ueda, T. Yu, M. Hirayama, et al., “Colossal negative magnetoresistance in field-induced Weyl semimetal of magnetic half-Heusler compound,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 6339, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41982-4

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Emergence of Weyl fermions by ferrimagnetism in a non- centrosymmetric magnetic Weyl semimetal,

    C. Li, J. Zhang, Y . Wang, et al., “Emergence of Weyl fermions by ferrimagnetism in a non- centrosymmetric magnetic Weyl semimetal,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 7185, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42996-8

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Weyl nodal ring states and Landau quantization with very large magnetoresistance in square-net magnet EuGa4,

    S. Lei, K. Allen, J. Huang, et al., “Weyl nodal ring states and Landau quantization with very large magnetoresistance in square-net magnet EuGa4,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 5812, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40767-z

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Large anomalous Hall effect in a half-Heu- sler antiferromagnet,

    T. Suzuki, R. Chisnell, A. Devarakonda, et al., “Large anomalous Hall effect in a half-Heu- sler antiferromagnet,” Nature Physics 12 (2016): 1119 –1123, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3831

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antifer- romagnet at room temperature,

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, T. Higo, “Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antifer- romagnet at room temperature,” Nature 527 (2015): 212 –215, https://doi.org/10.1038/na- ture15723

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal,

    K. Kim, J. Seo, E. Lee, et al., “Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal,” Nature Materials 17 (2018): 794–799, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0132-3

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Discovery of topological Weyl fermion lines and drumhead surface states in a room temperature magnet,

    I. Belopolski, K. Manna, D. S. Sanchez, et al., “Discovery of topological Weyl fermion lines and drumhead surface states in a room temperature magnet,” Science 365 (2019): 1278 – 1281, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2327

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Probing Berry Curvature in Magnetic Topological Insulators through Resonant Infrared Magnetic Circular Dichroism,

    S.-K. Bac, F. Le Mardelé, J. Wang, et al., “Probing Berry Curvature in Magnetic Topological Insulators through Resonant Infrared Magnetic Circular Dichroism,” Physical Review Let- ters 134 (2025): 016601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.016601

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    Signature of weakly coupled f electrons and conduction electrons in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidates PrAlSi and SmAlSi,

    R. Lou, A. Fedorov, L. Zhao, A. Yaresko, B. Büchner, S. Borisenko, “Signature of weakly coupled f electrons and conduction electrons in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidates PrAlSi and SmAlSi,” Physical Review B 107 (2023): 035158, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.035158

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Local Disorder-Induced Elevation of Intrinsic Anomalous Hall Conductance in an Electron-Doped Magnetic Weyl Semimetal,

    J. Shen, Q. Yao, Q. Zeng, et al., “Local Disorder-Induced Elevation of Intrinsic Anomalous Hall Conductance in an Electron-Doped Magnetic Weyl Semimetal,” Physical Review Let- ters 125 (2020): 086602, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.086602

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Anisotropic Dirac Fermions in a Bi Square Net of SrMnBi2,

    J. Park, G. Lee, F. Wolff-Fabris, et al., “Anisotropic Dirac Fermions in a Bi Square Net of SrMnBi2,” Physical Review Letters 107 (2011): 126402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.126402

    2011 doi

  19. [27]

    Magnetism-induced ideal Weyl state in bulk van der Waals crystal MnSb 2Te4,

    S. Huan, D. Wang, H. Su, et al., “Magnetism-induced ideal Weyl state in bulk van der Waals crystal MnSb 2Te4,” Applied Physics Letters 118 (2021): 192105, 16 / 26 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047438

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Terahertz conduc- tivity of the magnetic Weyl semimetal Mn 3Sn films,

    B. Cheng, Y . Wang, D. Barbalas, T. Higo, S. Nakatsuji, N. P. Armitage, “Terahertz conduc- tivity of the magnetic Weyl semimetal Mn 3Sn films,” Applied Physics Letters 115 (2019): 012405, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093414

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Large anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in the ferromag- netic semimetal candidate Mn 3Sn2,

    J. Bai, Q. Dong, B. Ruan, et al., “Large anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in the ferromag- netic semimetal candidate Mn 3Sn2,” Physical Review B 109 (2024): 125112, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.125112

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Five new ternary indium -arsenides discovered. Syn- thesis and structural characterization of the Zintl phases Sr 3In2As4, Ba3In2As4, Eu3In2As4, Sr5In2As6 and Eu 5In2As6,

    A. B. Childs, S. Baranets, S. Bobev, “Five new ternary indium -arsenides discovered. Syn- thesis and structural characterization of the Zintl phases Sr 3In2As4, Ba3In2As4, Eu3In2As4, Sr5In2As6 and Eu 5In2As6,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry 278 (2019): 120889, https://doi.or...

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Two types of colossal magnetore- sistance with distinct mechanisms in Eu 5In2As6,

    S. Balguri, M. B. Mahendru, E. O. G. Delgado, et al., “Two types of colossal magnetore- sistance with distinct mechanisms in Eu 5In2As6,” Physical Review B 111 (2025): 115114, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.115114

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    In-plane antiferromagnetic moments and magnetic polaron in the axion topological insulator candidate EuIn 2As2,

    Y . Zhang, K. Deng, X. Zhang, et al. , “In-plane antiferromagnetic moments and magnetic polaron in the axion topological insulator candidate EuIn 2As2,” Physical Review B 101 (2020): 205126, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.205126

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    Magnetic polaron formation in EuZn2P2,

    M. S. Cook, E. A. Peterson, C. S. Kengle, et al., “Magnetic polaron formation in EuZn2P2,” Physical Review Materials 9 (2025): 104403, https://doi.org/10.1103/fs97-mpcq

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    Magnetic and electronic properties unveil polaron formation in Eu 5In2Sb6,

    M. V . Ale Crivillero, S. Rößler, S. Granovsky, et al., “Magnetic and electronic properties unveil polaron formation in Eu 5In2Sb6,” Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 1597, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28711-z

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Electronic band reconstruction across the insulator-metal transition in colossally magnetoresistive EuCd2P2,

    H. Zhang, F. Du, X. Zheng, et al., “Electronic band reconstruction across the insulator-metal transition in colossally magnetoresistive EuCd2P2,” Physical Review B 108 (2023): L241115, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L241115

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Magnetic polaron and unconventional magneto- transport properties of the single -crystalline compound EuBiTe3,

    W. Shon, J.-S. Rhyee, Y . Jin, S.-J. Kim, “Magnetic polaron and unconventional magneto- transport properties of the single -crystalline compound EuBiTe3,” Physical Review B 100 (2019): 024433, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.024433

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    Anisotropic magnetic, magnetotransport, and electronic properties of the layered Zintl compound EuAl 2Si2,

    F. Tang, Y . Chen, W. Y u, et al., “Anisotropic magnetic, magnetotransport, and electronic properties of the layered Zintl compound EuAl 2Si2,” Physical Review Materials 9 (2025): 064205, https://doi.org/10.1103/llq5-zddh

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Evidence for Ferromagnetic Clusters in the Colossal- Magnetoresistance Material EuB 6,

    M. Pohlit, S. Rößler, Y . Ohno, et al., “Evidence for Ferromagnetic Clusters in the Colossal- Magnetoresistance Material EuB 6,” Physical Review Letters 120 (2018): 257201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.257201

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    Spin-flop transition in the easy-plane antiferromagnet nickel oxide,

    F. L. A. Machado, P. R. T. Ribeiro, J. Holanda, R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, A. Azevedo, S. M. Rezende, “Spin-flop transition in the easy-plane antiferromagnet nickel oxide,” Physical Re- view B 95 (2017): 104418, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.104418

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Phase diagram of multiferroic KCu3As2O7(OD)3,

    G. J. Nilsen, V . Simonet, C. V . Colin, et al., “Phase diagram of multiferroic KCu3As2O7(OD)3,” Physical Review B 95 (2017): 214415, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214415

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Observation of a second metastable spin - ordered state in ferrimagnet Cu 2OSeO3,

    C. L. Huang, K. F. Tseng, C. C. Chou, et al., “Observation of a second metastable spin - ordered state in ferrimagnet Cu 2OSeO3,” Physical Review B 83 (2011): 052402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.052402. 17 / 26

    2011 doi

  34. [42]

    Defect Engineering for Stabilizing Magnetic and Topolog- ical Properties in Mn(Bi 1-xSbx)2Te4,

    H. Chen, J. Wang, H. Li, et al., “Defect Engineering for Stabilizing Magnetic and Topolog- ical Properties in Mn(Bi 1-xSbx)2Te4,” Nature Communications 17 (202 6): 1029, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67774-6

    doi

  35. [43]

    A one-third magnetization plateau phase as evi- dence for the Kitaev interaction in a honeycomb-lattice antiferromagnet,

    Y . Shangguan, S. Bao, Z.-Y . Dong, et al., “A one-third magnetization plateau phase as evi- dence for the Kitaev interaction in a honeycomb-lattice antiferromagnet,” Nature Physics 19 (2023): 1883–1889, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02212-2

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Magnetic properties of EuCuAs single crystal,

    J. Tong, J. Parry, Q. Tao, G.-H. Cao, Z.-A. Xu, H. Zeng, “Magnetic properties of EuCuAs single crystal,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 602 (2014): 26 –31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.157

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    Hybrid-order topology in unconventional magnets of Eu- based Zintl compounds with surface-dependent quantum geometry,

    Y . Zhao, Y . Jiang, H. Bae, et al., “Hybrid-order topology in unconventional magnets of Eu- based Zintl compounds with surface-dependent quantum geometry,” Physical Review B 110 (2024): 205111, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.205111

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Topotaxial mutual-exchange growth of magnetic Zintl Eu3In2As4 nanowires with axion insulator classification,

    M. S. Song, L. Houben, Y . Zhao, et al., “Topotaxial mutual-exchange growth of magnetic Zintl Eu3In2As4 nanowires with axion insulator classification,” Nature Nanotechnology 19 (2024): 1796–1803, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01762-7

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in mono- layer WSe2,

    G. Aivazian, Z. Gong, A. M. Jones, et al., “Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in mono- layer WSe2,” Nature Physics 11 (2015): 148–152, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3201

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    Enhancing and controlling valley magnetic response in MoS2/WS2 heterostructures by all-optical route,

    J. Zhang, L. Du, S. Feng, et al., “Enhancing and controlling valley magnetic response in MoS2/WS2 heterostructures by all-optical route,” Nature Communications 10 (2019): 4226, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12128-2

    2019 doi

  41. [50]

    Large Zeeman splitting induced anomalous Hall effect in ZrTe5,

    Z. Sun, Z. Cao, J. Cui, et al., “Large Zeeman splitting induced anomalous Hall effect in ZrTe5,” npj Quantum Materials 5 (2020): 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-020-0239-z

    2020 doi

  42. [51]

    Observa- tion of Zeeman effect in topological surface state with distinct material dependence,

    Y.-S. Fu, T. Hanaguri, K. Igarashi, M. Kawamura, M. S. Bahramy, T. Sasagawa, “Observa- tion of Zeeman effect in topological surface state with distinct material dependence,” Nature Communications 7 (2016): 10829, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10829

    2016 doi

  43. [52]

    Zeeman splitting and dynamical mass generation in Dirac semimetal ZrTe 5,

    Y . Liu, X. Y uan, C. Zhang, et al., “Zeeman splitting and dynamical mass generation in Dirac semimetal ZrTe 5,” Nature Communications 7 (2016): 12516, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12516

    2016 doi

  44. [53]

    EuCd 2As2: A Magnetic Semiconductor,

    D. Santos-Cottin, I. Mohelský, J. Wyzula, et al., “EuCd 2As2: A Magnetic Semiconductor,” Physical Review Letters 131 (2023): 186704, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.186704

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    Magneto-optical response of the mag- netic semiconductors EuCd 2X2 (X=P, As, Sb),

    S. Nasrallah, D. Santos-Cottin, F. Le Mardelé, et al., “Magneto-optical response of the mag- netic semiconductors EuCd 2X2 (X=P, As, Sb),” Physical Review B 110 (2024): L201201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L201201

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    The discovery of three-dimensional Van Hove singularity,

    W. Wu, Z. Shi, M. Ozerov, et al., “The discovery of three-dimensional Van Hove singularity,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 2313, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46626-9

    2024 doi

  47. [56]

    Optical absorption of EuTe in high mag- netic fields,

    L. E. Schmutz, G. Dresselhaus, M. S. Dresselhaus, “Optical absorption of EuTe in high mag- netic fields,” Solid State Communications 28 (1978): 597 –600, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(78)90588-4

    1978 doi

  48. [57]

    The phenomena of spin-filter tunnelling,

    J. S. Moodera, T. S. Santos, T. Nagahama, “The phenomena of spin-filter tunnelling,” Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 19 (2007): 165202, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953 - 18 / 26 8984/19/16/165202

    2007 doi

  49. [58]

    Theory of the coupling between conduction electrons and moments of 3d and 4f ions in metals,

    L. L. Hirst, “Theory of the coupling between conduction electrons and moments of 3d and 4f ions in metals,” Advances in Physics 27 (1978): 231 –285, https://doi.org/10.1080/00018737800101374

    1978 doi

  50. [59]

    Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators,

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, “Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators,” Science 329 (2010): 61 –64, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187485

    2010 doi

  51. [60]

    Anisotropic magnetotransport and exotic longitudinal linear magnetoresistance in WTe 2 crystals,

    Y . Zhao, H. Liu, J. Yan, et al., “Anisotropic magnetotransport and exotic longitudinal linear magnetoresistance in WTe 2 crystals,” Physical Review B 92 (2015): 041104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.041104

    2015 doi

  52. [61]

    Extremely high magnetoresistance and conductivity in the type-II Weyl semimetals WP 2 and MoP 2,

    N. Kumar, Y . Sun, N. Xu, et al., “Extremely high magnetoresistance and conductivity in the type-II Weyl semimetals WP 2 and MoP 2,” Nature Communications 8 (2017): 1642, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01758-z

    2017 doi

  53. [62]

    Anisotropic giant magnetoresistance and Fermi surface topology in the layered compound YbBi 2,

    X. Sun, F. Tang, X. Shen, et al., “Anisotropic giant magnetoresistance and Fermi surface topology in the layered compound YbBi 2,” Physical Review B 105 (2022): 195114, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.195114

    2022 doi

  54. [63]

    Simultaneous colossal magnetoresistance and angular mag- netoresistance in the antiferromagnetic semiconductor EuSe 2,

    Q. Dong, P. Yang, Z. Liu, et al., “Simultaneous colossal magnetoresistance and angular mag- netoresistance in the antiferromagnetic semiconductor EuSe 2,” Physical Review B 112 (2025): L140405, https://doi.org/10.1103/p2c5-r163

    2025 doi

  55. [64]

    Colossal angular magnetoresistance in the antiferromag- netic semiconductor EuTe 2,

    H. Yang, Q. Liu, Z. Liao, et al., “Colossal angular magnetoresistance in the antiferromag- netic semiconductor EuTe 2,” Physical Review B 104 (2021): 214419, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.214419

    2021 doi

  56. [65]

    Field-induced metal-to-insulator transition and colossal anisotropic magnetoresistance in a nearly Dirac material EuMnSb2,

    Z. L. Sun, A. F. Wang, H. M. Mu, et al., “Field-induced metal-to-insulator transition and colossal anisotropic magnetoresistance in a nearly Dirac material EuMnSb2,” npj Quantum Materials 6 (2021): 94, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-021-00397-4

    2021 doi

  57. [66]

    Nonsaturating magnetoresistance, anomalous Hall effect, and magnetic quantum oscillations in the ferromagnetic semimetal PrAlSi,

    M. Lyu, J. Xiang, Z. Mi, et al., “Nonsaturating magnetoresistance, anomalous Hall effect, and magnetic quantum oscillations in the ferromagnetic semimetal PrAlSi,” Physical Review B 102 (2020): 085143, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085143

    2020 doi

  58. [67]

    Transversal magnetoresistance and Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in Weyl semimetals,

    J. Klier, I. V . Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, “Transversal magnetoresistance and Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in Weyl semimetals,” Physical Review B 96 (2017): 214209, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.214209

    2017 doi

  59. [68]

    Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal Cd 3As2,

    T. Liang, Q. Gibson, M. N. Ali, M. Liu, R. J. Cava, N. P. Ong, “Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal Cd 3As2,” Nature Materials 14 (2015): 280–284, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4143

    2015 doi

  60. [69]

    Quantum transport in Dirac and Weyl semimetals: a review,

    S. Wang, B.-C. Lin, A.-Q. Wang, D.-P. Yu, Z.-M. Liao, “Quantum transport in Dirac and Weyl semimetals: a review,” Advances in Physics: X 2 (2017): 518 –544, https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2017.1327329

    2017

  61. [70]

    Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological Weyl semimetal candidate NbP ,

    C. Shekhar, A. K. Nayak, Y . Sun, et al., “Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological Weyl semimetal candidate NbP ,” Nature Physics 11 (2015): 645– 649, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3372

    2015 doi

  62. [71]

    Large, non -saturating magnetoresistance in WTe 2,

    M. N. Ali, J. Xiong, S. Flynn, et al., “Large, non -saturating magnetoresistance in WTe 2,” Nature 514 (2014): 205–208, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13763

    2014 doi

  63. [72]

    Revealing Fermi surface evolution and Berry curvature in an ideal type -II Weyl semimetal,

    Q. Jiang, J. C. Palmstrom, J. Singleton, et al., “Revealing Fermi surface evolution and Berry curvature in an ideal type -II Weyl semimetal,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 2310, 19 / 26 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46633-w

    2024 doi

  64. [73]

    Evidence for a Magnetic -Field-Induced Ideal Type-II Weyl State in Antiferromagnetic Topological Insulator Mn(Bi1-xSbx)2Te4,

    S. H. Lee, D. Graf, L. Min, et al., “Evidence for a Magnetic -Field-Induced Ideal Type-II Weyl State in Antiferromagnetic Topological Insulator Mn(Bi1-xSbx)2Te4,” Physical Review X 11 (2021): 031032, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031032

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    Tutorial: a beginner’s guide to interpreting magnetic suscep- tibility data with the Curie -Weiss law,

    S. Mugiraneza, A. M. Hallas, “Tutorial: a beginner’s guide to interpreting magnetic suscep- tibility data with the Curie -Weiss law,” Communications Physics 5 (2022): 95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00853-y

    2022 doi

  66. [75]

    Topological Lifshitz transition and one-dimensional Weyl mode in HfTe5,

    W. Wu, Z. Shi, Y . Du, et al., “Topological Lifshitz transition and one-dimensional Weyl mode in HfTe5,” Nature Materials 22 (2023): 84–91, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01364- 5

    2023 doi

  67. [76]

    Multipolar interactions in f-electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides,

    P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, N. Magnani, G. H. Lander, “Multipolar interactions in f-electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides,” Reviews of Modern Physics 81 (2009): 807–863, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.807

    2009 doi

  68. [77]

    Interwoven magnetic kagome metal overcomes geomet- ric frustration,

    E. Cheng, K. Wang, Y . Hao, et al., “Interwoven magnetic kagome metal overcomes geomet- ric frustration,” Nature Materials 25 (2026): 602–609, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025- 02414-4

    2026 doi

  69. [78]

    1/3 and other magnetization plateaus in the quasi-one-dimen- sional Ising magnet TbTi 3Bi4 with zigzag spin chain,

    K. Guo, Z. Ma, H. Liu, et al., “1/3 and other magnetization plateaus in the quasi-one-dimen- sional Ising magnet TbTi 3Bi4 with zigzag spin chain,” Physical Review B 110 (2024): 064416, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.064416

    2024 doi

  70. [79]

    Magnetic properties of Dy3+ ions and crystal field characterization in YF3:Dy3+ and DyF3 single crystals,

    A. V . Savinkov, S. L. Korableva, A. A. Rodionov, et al., “Magnetic properties of Dy3+ ions and crystal field characterization in YF3:Dy3+ and DyF3 single crystals,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20 (2008): 485220, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/48/485220

    2008 doi

  71. [80]

    Defect-driven ferrimagnetism and hidden magnetization in MnBi 2Te4,

    Y . Lai, L. Ke, J. Yan, R. D. McDonald, R. J. McQueeney, “Defect-driven ferrimagnetism and hidden magnetization in MnBi 2Te4,” Physical Review B 103 (2021): 184429, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184429

    2021 doi

  72. [81]

    Evolution of structural, magnetic, and transport properties in MnBi2-xSbxTe4,

    J.-Q. Yan, S. Okamoto, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, R. J. McQueeney, B. C. Sales, “Evolution of structural, magnetic, and transport properties in MnBi2-xSbxTe4,” Physical Review B 100 (2019): 104409, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.104409

    2019 doi

  73. [82]

    Prediction and observation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator,

    M. M. Otrokov, I. I. Klimovskikh, H. Bentmann, et al., “Prediction and observation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator,” Nature 576 (2019): 416 –422, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1840-9

    2019 doi

  74. [83]

    Manipulation of topological phase transi- tions and the mechanism of magnetic interactions in Eu-based Zintl-phase materials,

    B.-X. Li, Z. Song, Z. Fang, Z. Wang, H. Weng, “Manipulation of topological phase transi- tions and the mechanism of magnetic interactions in Eu-based Zintl-phase materials,” Phys- ical Review B 111 (2025): 205127, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.205127

    2025 doi

  75. [84]

    Recent progress and future challenges on thermoelectric Zintl materials,

    J. Shuai, J. Mao, S. Song, Q. Zhang, G. Chen, Z. Ren, “Recent progress and future challenges on thermoelectric Zintl materials,” Materials Today Physics 1 (2017): 74 –95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2017.06.003

    2017 doi

  76. [85]

    Structure and chemical bonding in zintl-phases containing lithium,

    R. Nesper, “Structure and chemical bonding in zintl-phases containing lithium,” Progress in Solid State Chemistry 20 (1990): 1–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6786(90)90006-2

    1990 doi

  77. [86]

    Negative Mag- netoresistance in a Magnetic Semiconducting Zintl Phase: Eu3In2P4,

    J. Jiang, M. M. Olmstead, S. M. Kauzlarich, H.-O. Lee, P. Klavins, Z. Fisk, “Negative Mag- netoresistance in a Magnetic Semiconducting Zintl Phase: Eu3In2P4,” Inorganic Chemistry 44 (2005): 5322–5327, https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0504036

    2005 doi

  78. [87]

    Intrinsic magnetic topological insulators in van der Waals layered MnBi2Te4-family materials,

    J. Li, Y . Li, S. Du, et al., “Intrinsic magnetic topological insulators in van der Waals layered MnBi2Te4-family materials,” Science Advances 5 (2019): eaaw5685, 20 / 26 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw5685

    2019 doi

  79. [88]

    Ideal Weyl semimetal induced by magnetic exchange,

    J.-R. Soh, F. De Juan, M. G. Vergniory, et al., “Ideal Weyl semimetal induced by magnetic exchange,” Physical Review B 100 (2019): 201102, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.201102

    2019 doi

  80. [89]

    Magnetic Weyl Semimetal in K 2Mn3(AsO4)3 with the Minimum Number of Weyl Points,

    S. Nie, T. Hashimoto, F. B. Prinz, “Magnetic Weyl Semimetal in K 2Mn3(AsO4)3 with the Minimum Number of Weyl Points,” Phys. Rev. Lett 128 (2022): 176401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.176401

    2022 doi

  81. [90]

    Synthesis of a semimetallic Weyl ferromagnet with point Fermi surface,

    I. Belopolski, R. Watanabe, Y . Sato, et al., “Synthesis of a semimetallic Weyl ferromagnet with point Fermi surface,” Nature 637 (2025): 1078–1083, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586- 024-08330-y

    2025 doi

  82. [91]

    Absence of metallicity and bias-dependent resistivity in low- carrier-density EuCd 2As2,

    Y . Wang, J. Ma, J. Yuan, et al., “Absence of metallicity and bias-dependent resistivity in low- carrier-density EuCd 2As2,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 67 (2024): 247311, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2283-0

    2024 doi

  83. [92]

    Absence of Weyl nodes in EuCd2As2 revealed by the carrier density dependence of the anomalous Hall effect,

    Y . Shi, Z. Liu, L. A. Burnett, et al., “Absence of Weyl nodes in EuCd2As2 revealed by the carrier density dependence of the anomalous Hall effect,” Physical Review B 109 (2024): 125202, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.125202

    2024 doi

  84. [93]

    Insulating ground state and 2-k magnetic structure of candidate Weyl Hydrogen atom K 2Mn3(AsO4)3,

    K. M. Taddei, K. G. S. Ranmohotti, D. S. Liurukara, et al., “Insulating ground state and 2-k magnetic structure of candidate Weyl Hydrogen atom K 2Mn3(AsO4)3,” Physical Review B 113 (2026): 024423, https://doi.org/10.1103/9j29-yb8p

    2026 doi

  85. [94]

    Discovery of a Magnetic Topological Semimetal Eu 3In2As4 with a Single Pair of Weyl Points,

    K. Jia, J. Yao, X. He, et al., “Discovery of a Magnetic Topological Semimetal Eu 3In2As4 with a Single Pair of Weyl Points,” arXiv, (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.07637

    2024 doi arXiv

  86. [95]

    A high-flux and high-efficiency setup for magneto-infrared spectroscopy,

    Z. Shi, W. Wu, Z. Zhang, et al., “A high-flux and high-efficiency setup for magneto-infrared spectroscopy,” Review of Scientific Instruments 96 (2025): 113902, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0296925

    2025 doi

  87. [96]

    Projector augmented -wave method,

    P. E. Blöchl, “Projector augmented -wave method,” Physical Review B 50 (1994): 17953– 17979, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    1994 doi

  88. [97]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane -wave basis set,

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane -wave basis set,” Physical Review B 54 (1996): 11169 –11186, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996 doi

  89. [98]

    Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple,

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple,” Physical Review Letters 77 (1996): 3865 –3868, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  90. [99]

    Electron-en- ergy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study,

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y . Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, A. P. Sutton, “Electron-en- ergy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study,” Physical Review B 57 (1998): 1505–1509, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505

    1998 doi

  91. [100]

    First principles phonon calculations in materials science,

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, “First principles phonon calculations in materials science,” Scripta Ma- terialia 108 (2015): 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021

    2015 doi

  92. [101]

    Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands,

    I. Souza, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, “Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands,” Physical Review B 65 (2001): 035109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035109

    2001 doi

  93. [102]

    WannierTools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials,

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, A. A. Soluyanov, “WannierTools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials,” Computer Physics Communications 224 (2018): 405–416, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.09.033. 21 / 26

    2018 doi

  94. [103]

    High -Angular Momentum Excitations in Collinear Antiferromagnet FePS 3,

    J. Wyzula, I. Mohelský, D. Václavková, et al., “High -Angular Momentum Excitations in Collinear Antiferromagnet FePS 3,” Nano Letters 22 (2022): 9741 –9747, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04111

    2022 doi

  95. [104]

    Magnetic-field-induced shift of the optical band gap in Ni 3V2O8,

    P. Chen, B. S. Holinsworth, K. R. O’Neal, et al., “Magnetic-field-induced shift of the optical band gap in Ni 3V2O8,” Physical Review B 89 (2014): 165120, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.165120

    2014 doi

  96. [105]

    Sensing the Local Magnetic Environment through Optically Active Defects in a Layered Magnetic Semiconductor,

    J. Klein, Z. Song, B. Pingault, et al., “Sensing the Local Magnetic Environment through Optically Active Defects in a Layered Magnetic Semiconductor,” ACS Nano 17 (2023): 288– 299, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c07655

    2023 doi

  97. [106]

    Evidence for three-dimensional Dirac conical bands in TlBiSSe by optical and magneto -optical spectroscopy,

    F. Le Mardelé, J. Wyzula, I. Mohelsky, et al., “Evidence for three-dimensional Dirac conical bands in TlBiSSe by optical and magneto -optical spectroscopy,” Physical Review B 107 (2023): L241101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L241101

    2023 doi

  98. [107]

    Quantum -limit Chern topological magnetism in TbMn6Sn6,

    J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, et al., “Quantum -limit Chern topological magnetism in TbMn6Sn6,” Nature 583 (2020): 533–536, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2482-7

    2020 doi

  99. [108]

    Spectroscopic evidence for bulk-band inversion and three-dimensional massive Dirac fermions in ZrTe5,

    Z.-G. Chen, R. Y . Chen, R. D. Zhong, et al., “Spectroscopic evidence for bulk-band inversion and three-dimensional massive Dirac fermions in ZrTe5,” Proceedings of the National Acad- emy of Sciences 114 (2017): 816–821, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613110114. 22 / 26 FIGURE ...

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.