Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Quantum-State Projectors on Grassmannian: Geometry, Holonomy, and Topology

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A projector-only calculus unifies band geometry and topology.

desk verdict A clean, mostly self-contained projector calculus paper with one genuinely new and correct result—the Newton-identity Wilson-loop determinant—and a caveat that the geodesic phase interpretation lives in the ambient Grassmannian, not necessarily on the physical band manifold. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06777 v1 pith:DYSNACDG submitted 2026-08-07 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el

Shin-Ming Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.str-el MSC 81Q7014M1553B20 PACS 03.65.Vz02.40.-k
keywords GrassmannianspectralprojectorquantumgeometrictensorBerrycurvatureWilsonloopdeterminantChernnumberchiralwindingZ2index
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An isolated group of $k$ bands is described by its spectral projector $P$, and this paper argues that $P$ together with its differential $\mathrm{d}P$ is enough to recover every gauge-invariant geometric and topological quantity of the band multiplet. Because a smooth gapped Hamiltonian always has a globally smooth periodic projector, the formalism works even where a smooth Bloch frame is obstructed by topology. The paper shows the interband block of $\mathrm{d}P$ simultaneously determines the quantum metric and Berry curvature, derives a geodesic construction whose horizontal generator has the principal angles as singular values, and proves that the determinant of a multiband Wilson loop can be written using traces of powers of an ordered projector product even when the band multiplet is degenerate. The same tangent-vector calculus is then used to organize Chern characters, chiral winding numbers, and the time-reversal $\mathbb{Z}_2$ index. If correct, this gives a gauge-invariant route from local quantum geometry to global topology without ever choosing a global frame.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Cartan decomposition of $\mathfrak{u}(N)$ into stabilizer and horizontal blocks, with the map $X\mapsto [X,P]$ identifying tangent vectors of the Grassmannian; the horizontal generator $X=[\mathrm{d}P,P]$ is block-off-diagonal in the eigenbasis, and the singular values of its block in the SVD of $\Psi_1^\dagger\Psi_2$ are the principal angles between the endpoint subspaces. The Wilson-loop result is carried by the Cayley–Hamilton theorem and Newton identities, which express characteristic-polynomial coefficients, including the determinant, from power traces $\mathrm{tr}(P_{\mathrm{loop}}^m)$ for $m\le k$. Topological forms are carried by the non-Abelian curvature $F=B^\dagger\wedge B$ and its projector form $\mathrm{tr}[(iP\,\mathrm{d}P\wedge\mathrm{d}P)^n]$, by the flat chiral connection $A_\Gamma$ defined from the chiral partial isometry $q_\Gamma$, and by the time-reversal paired projector $P_\Theta$.

What would settle it

Use a two-band model with a curved band manifold (non-flat quantum metric), take two momenta $\mathbf{k}_1$ and $\mathbf{k}_2$, compute the unique shortest geodesic in $\mathrm{Gr}(1,2)$ between $P(\mathbf{k}_1)$ and $P(\mathbf{k}_2)$, and test whether each point of that geodesic equals $P(\mathbf{k}(t))$ for some path $\mathbf{k}(t)$ in the Brillouin zone; if the ambient geodesic leaves the physical image, the piecewise-geodesic interpretation of the discrete Berry phase fails for that pair.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a band structure of $k$ occupied bands is best described not by eigenvectors but by the spectral projector $P(k)$, a point of $\mathrm{Gr}(k,N)$, and that every gauge-invariant geometric or topological datum is expressible through $\mathrm{d}P$ and products of projectors. Concretely, $\mathrm{d}P=[X,P]$ discards $\mathrm{U}(k)\times\mathrm{U}(N-k)$ rotations within and between subspaces and retains only interband transitions; in the eigenbasis its off-diagonal block $B$ encodes both the quantum metric $g=2\,\mathrm{Re}\,\mathrm{tr}(B^\dagger B)$ and the trace Berry curvature $F=-2\,\mathrm{Im}\,\mathrm{tr}(B^\dagger B)$. The paper constructs the finite-distance geodesic between two projectors and shows the singular values of the horizontal generator block are the principal angles, yielding distance $l=(2\sum_\alpha \theta_\alpha^2)^{1/2}$. It interprets Bargmann invariants as holonomies of piecewise-geodesic polygons and shows that subdividing a geodesic edge leaves the phase unchanged. For Wilson loops, it proves via Cayley–Hamilton and Newton identities that $\det W_{\mathrm{loop}}$ is a polynomial in $\mathrm{tr}(P_{\mathrm{loop}}^m)$ for $m\le k$, so the determinant, and hence the total Berry phase, is defined without decomposing a degenerate multiplet into individual bands. The same tangent-vector calculus yields Chern characters from $\mathrm{tr}[(iP\,\mathrm{d}P\wedge\mathrm{d}P)^n]$, chiral winding numbers from the flat Maurer–Cartan form $A_\Gamma$, and the time-reversal $\mathbb{Z}_2$ index from a paired projector $P_\Theta$.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes a smooth gapped Hamiltonian so that $P$ is globally smooth and periodic, and the piecewise-geodesic reading assumes the shortest ambient Grassmannian path between projectors lies inside the physical image of the Brillouin zone, which the paper explicitly notes is model dependent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, quantum metric, Berry curvature, and higher quantum geometry of a degenerate band group can be computed from projectors alone, with no smooth gauge choice anywhere in the calculation.
  • The Wilson-loop determinant, and thus the total Berry phase, remains well defined at symmetry-enforced internal degeneracies where individual band projectors do not exist, as long as the ordered projector product is formed.
  • Discrete geometric phases acquired in cycling through momentum points can be read as holonomies of piecewise-geodesic paths in the Grassmannian, with subdivision of geodesic edges leaving the phase invariant.
  • Chern numbers, chiral winding numbers, and the Fu–Kane $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant all reduce to integrals of differential forms built from $\mathrm{d}P$, making the topological invariants manifestly gauge invariant on the Brillouin torus.
  • The horizontal-generator construction gives a closed-form geodesic distance between projectors in terms of principal angles, which can be evaluated without numerically integrating the geodesic equation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable implication the paper leaves open: for a band manifold with curvature, the shortest ambient Grassmannian path between two projectors may leave the physical image $P(M)$, so the piecewise-geodesic reading of discrete phases is then a statement about ambient geometry rather than about an actually traversed physical path. This can be checked by computing the ambient geodesic and asking whe
  • The trace-only determinant formula suggests a numerical route to Wilson-loop spectra and topological invariants that is robust at accidental and symmetry-enforced degeneracies, and it may extend to higher Chern characters defined on tensor products of projectors.
  • The paired-projector construction for time-reversal symmetry is a candidate for a fully projector-based definition of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant that avoids sewing matrices, which could be tested directly on a model with a nontrivial $\mathbb{Z}_2$ phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a gauge-invariant, projector-based calculus for an isolated group of k bands in an N-level system, viewing the band structure as a map from the Brillouin torus into the complex Grassmannian Gr(k,N). The central object is the globally defined differential dP, which removes the U(k) gauge redundancy and carries the interband transition data. From this tangent-vector perspective the paper constructs the quantum geometric tensor, the horizontal generator for finite Grassmannian motion, the ambient Grassmannian geodesic between two projectors, and a piecewise-geodesic interpretation of discrete geometric phases. It further derives a projector-only expression for the determinant of a multiband Wilson loop in terms of traces of powers of an ordered projector product, valid without decomposing a degenerate band multiplet, and recasts Chern characters, chiral winding numbers, and the time-reversal Z2 index in the same formalism. The main results are presented as exact derivations from stated definitions, with technical material in three appendices.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides a useful unification: local quantum geometry, finite-distance subspace geometry, holonomy, and topology are all expressed through projectors and their differentials, avoiding global gauge fixing and remaining well defined at internal degeneracies. The concrete Wilson-loop determinant identity, the geodesic generator construction, and the differential-form organization of topological invariants are presented in a self-contained way. The paper contains no fitted parameters and its core identities are derived algebraically rather than assumed. The strongest contributions are the SVD-based principal-angle construction of the Grassmannian geodesic generator and the projector-only Wilson-loop determinant, which should be practically useful once the general formula is stated correctly.

major comments (1)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (B5)] The displayed general determinant formula in Eq. (B5) is not the Newton-identity determinant and is inconsistent with the explicit low-rank cases that follow. For k=2, the displayed lower-triangular matrix evaluates to (tr P_loop)^2, so with the 1/2! prefactor one obtains (tr P_loop)^2/2, whereas Eq. (B7) correctly gives (1/2)[(tr P_loop)^2 - tr(P_loop^2)]. The standard Newton determinant contains nonzero superdiagonal entries 1,2,...,k-1, which are missing from the matrix as printed. Because Eq. (B5) is advertised as the general projector-only Wilson-loop determinant for arbitrary k, this is a load-bearing point and must be corrected; if it is a typesetting omission, the typeset matrix should be fixed to display the standard Newton determinant.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section VI C] The time-reversal section is noticeably terser than the rest of the paper: the transition matrix tTheta(k), the identity A(-k)=w(k)(A(k)^* - Omega(k))w(k)^dagger, and the construction of PTheta(k) are presented without derivation. The formulas appear to be consistent, but a short derivation or reference to the standard sewing-matrix calculation would help the reader verify the sign conventions.
  2. [Section IV D, Eq. (52)] The multi-line display in Eq. (52) is dense; separating the expression for the time-evolved frame from the final projector form would improve readability and reduce the risk of misreading the repeated factors.
  3. [Section IV E, Eq. (65)] The assertion that S(t) is positive semidefinite and hence phase-free assumes 0 <= theta_alpha < pi/2; this restriction should be stated explicitly in the sentence preceding Eq. (65), since the cut-locus case is only mentioned later.
  4. [Section VI A, Eq. (99)] The notation d^{2n}k in Eq. (99) should be defined explicitly at first use as dk^1 ... dk^{2n}, since the antisymmetrization is otherwise easy to misread.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed identities are derived from stated definitions, and self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The paper is a purely analytic derivation and contains no fitted parameters or empirical benchmark, so circularity can only arise as a mathematical identity-in-disguise. The Grassmannian tangent/Cartan construction (Secs. III-IV A) is definitional algebra: T_µ=∂_µP=[X_µ,P] and X_µ=[T_µ,P] are stated and then used, not assumed as predictions. The geodesic/horizontal-generator result (Sec. IV D, Eqs. (42)-(60)) constructs a generator from the SVD of the endpoint overlap and proves cosΘ=Σ by comparing the t=1 geodesic frame with the endpoint frame; the “principal angles” identification is the conclusion of the calculation, not an input. The Wilson-loop determinant formula (Sec. IV E 2 and Appendix B, Eq. (B5)) follows from the Cayley-Hamilton theorem plus tr(P_loop^m)=tr(W_loop^m), which is established by the restriction identity in Eq. (72); the determinant is therefore derived, not restated. The chiral winding equivalence (Appendix C, Eqs. (C8)-(C10)) and the TR-paired projector construction (Sec. VI C) are explicit algebraic identities. The only self-citations are [35] and [41], used for background on Grassmannian principal angles and eigenprojector derivative calculus; neither forces the central results. The paper itself flags the one interpretive limitation in Sec. IV C: “The resulting ambient geodesic need not lie in the physical image P(M)” and “whether this path lies in P(M) is model dependent”; this is a scope restriction, not a circular move. The absence of numerical checks is a completeness issue, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new particles, forces, dimensions, or physical entities are introduced. The paper is an exercise in exact differential geometry and linear algebra. The assumptions are standard mathematical background plus the physical gap and symmetry conditions stated in the text.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The spectral projector P(k) of a smooth gapped Hamiltonian is globally smooth and periodic over the Brillouin zone.
    Invoked in Sec. II and throughout; the entire projector calculus depends on a global gap separating the selected k bands.
  • standard math Standard Grassmannian and Lie-group geometry: Cartan decomposition u(N)=k⊕p, Frobenius metric, Levi-Civita connection, geodesics of the bi-invariant metric, principal angles via SVD.
    Used in Secs. III-IV, citing [35,38,42]; these are established mathematical facts, not derived in the paper.
  • standard math Cayley-Hamilton theorem and Newton identities express a matrix determinant from traces of powers.
    Used in Appendix B for the Wilson-loop determinant formula; standard linear algebra.
  • domain assumption For the triangulation of Bargmann invariants, the involved overlap matrices must be nonsingular so denominators do not vanish (Eq. 67).
    Stated in Sec. IV E 1 as nonvanishing denominators; degenerate or orthogonal overlap configurations can invalidate the triangulation phase relation.
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry is momentum-independent with equal numbers of occupied and unoccupied bands and Γ^2=I, for the winding-number construction.
    Assumed in Sec. VI B; the chiral-paired frame and flat connection AΓ depend on this.
  • domain assumption Spinful time-reversal symmetry has Θ^2=-1 and even occupied rank for the Z2 construction.
    Assumed in Sec. VI C; the enlarged projector PΘ relies on the sewing matrix relations from [59].
  • standard math The differential-form integrals of characteristic classes (Chern character, winding number) are integer-valued on closed manifolds without a global gauge.
    Invoked in Sec. VI A-C; standard de Rham and characteristic-class theory, not rederived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum-State Projectors on Grassmannian: Geometry, Holonomy, and Topology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DYSNACDG

@misc{pith2026260806777,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum-State Projectors on Grassmannian: Geometry, Holonomy, and Topology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DYSNACDG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06777}
}
abstract

An isolated group of $k$ bands in an $N$-level quantum system defines a rank-$k$ spectral projector and hence a map into the complex Grassmannian $\mathrm{Gr}(k,N)$. For a smooth gapped Hamiltonian, this projector is globally smooth and periodic even when band topology obstructs a globally smooth periodic, or symmetry-compatible, Bloch frame. We take the globally defined differential $\dd P$ as the central object: it is the tangent field of the Grassmannian map, removes unphysical rotations within the selected subspace, and retains the physical interband transition. The interband block of this tangent data simultaneously determines the quantum metric and Berry curvature; the associated horizontal generator produces finite Grassmannian motion, while wedge products of $\dd P$ enter topological forms. We construct a shortest path between two projectors in the ambient Grassmannian and show that the singular values of its horizontal generator block are the principal angles between the endpoint subspaces. This construction provides a piecewise-geodesic interpretation of discrete geometric phases. In a separate development, we derive a basis-independent expression for the determinant of a multiband Wilson loop from traces of powers of an ordered projector product, without decomposing a degenerate band multiplet into individual bands. Finally, the same tangent-vector calculus organizes Chern characters, chiral winding numbers, and the time-reversal $\mathbb Z_2$ index. The resulting framework unifies local quantum geometry, finite subspace distance, holonomy, and topology while avoiding global gauge fixing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06777 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Triangulation of a six-point Bargmann invariant into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (10) ensures that [A,A ′]∈kwheneverA,A ′∈k

    These generators span the stabilizer subalgebrak; Eq. (10) ensures that [A,A ′]∈kwheneverA,A ′∈k. Its exponential is the stabilizer groupK≃U(k)×U(N−k). On the other hand, a physical generatorXbelongs to p, the orthogonal complement ofkwith respect to the Frobenius metric. In differential geometry and gauge theory, the motions bykandpare called vertical an...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The gauge transfor- mations Φi = ΨiRi leaveP i invariant and give Φ† 1Φ2 = Σ

    The singular-value decomposition (SVD) Ψ† 1Ψ2 =R 1ΣR† 2,(42) defines the principal anglesθ i ∈[0,π/2] throughs i = cosθi, where Σ = diag(s 1,...,s k). The gauge transfor- mations Φi = ΨiRi leaveP i invariant and give Φ† 1Φ2 = Σ. Consequently, P1P2 = Φ1ΣΦ† 2.(43) The SVD determines the principal frames associated with the twok-planes. A detailed geometric ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Bargmann invariant Consider a discrete cyclic transition process fromP 1 toP 2, then toP 3, and eventually returning toP 1, where Ψj≡Ψ(k j) denotes the multiplet of states at each point. Throughout this loop, the system accumulates a geomet- ric Berry phaseφ B determined by φB =−arg det(W 123),(62) whereW 123 =M 1,2M2,3M3,1 is the overlap product, with (M...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Discretize a closed path ask 0→k 1→···→k L≡k 0 and define the Wilson-loop matrix Wloop =M 0,1M1,2M2,3···M L−1,L (68) whereM i,i+1 = Ψ(ki)†Ψ(ki+1)

    Wilson loop Under appropriate symmetry constraints, a noncon- tractible loop can carry quantized holonomy. Discretize a closed path ask 0→k 1→···→k L≡k 0 and define the Wilson-loop matrix Wloop =M 0,1M1,2M2,3···M L−1,L (68) whereM i,i+1 = Ψ(ki)†Ψ(ki+1). At finite mesh spacing these overlaps are generally not unitary. The product 1 2 6 5 4 3 FIG. 1. Triang...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys

    B. Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2167 (1983)

    1983

  6. [6]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  7. [7]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 2111 (1984)

    1984

  8. [8]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vall´ ee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    1980

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Y.-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. B81, 245129 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 240001 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Fundamental bound on topological gap, Phys. Rev. X14, 011052 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als, npj Quantum Mater.10, 101 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Jiang, T

    Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Revealing quantum ge- ometry in nonlinear quantum materials, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 10.1088/1361-6633/ade454 (2025)

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump, Phys. Rev. B74, 195312 (2006)

    2006

  8. [16]

    Cuerda, J

    J. Cuerda, J. M. Taskinen, N. K¨ allman, L. Grabitz, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Observation of quantum metric and non- Hermitian Berry curvature in a plasmonic lattice, Phys. Rev. Research6, L022020 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    M. Kang, S. Kim, Y. Qian, P. M. Neves, L. Ye, J. Jung, D. Puntel, F. Mazzola, S. Fang, C. Jozwiak, A. Bost- wick, E. Rotenberg, J. Fuji, I. Vobornik, J.-H. Park, J. G. Checkelsky, B.-J. Yang, and R. Comin, Measurements of the quantum geometric tensor in solids, Nat. Phys.21, 1...

    2025

  10. [18]

    S. Kim, Y. Chung, Y. Qian, S. Park, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, A. Bostwick, K. S. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Direct measurement of the quantum metric tensor in solids, Science388, 1050 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Gao, Y.-F

    A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V. Trevisan, Y. Onishi,et al., Quantum metric nonlinear Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnetic heterostructure, Science 381, 181 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang, S. Ru, H. Cai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Yan, and W. Gao, Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topo- logical antiferromagnet, Nature621, 487 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    G. Sala, M. T. Mercaldo, K. Domi, S. Gariglio, M. Cuoco, C. Ortix, and A. D. Caviglia, The quantum metric of electrons with spin-momentum locking, Science389, 822 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    G. Sala, E. Longo, M. T. Mercaldo, S. Gariglio, M. Cuoco, R. Mantovan, C. Ortix, and A. D. Caviglia, Probing the quantum metric of 3D topological insulators, Nat. Mater. 10.1038/s41563-026-02617-3 (2026)

    2026 doi

  15. [23]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nat. Phys.18, 290 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Avdoshkin, J

    A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, and J. E. Moore, Multi- state geometry of shift current and polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 066901 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Ulrich, J

    Y. Ulrich, J. Mitscherling, L. Classen, and A. P. Schny- der, Quantum geometric origin of the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B113, L201107 (2026)

    2026

  18. [26]

    Panati, Triviality of Bloch and Bloch–Dirac bundles, Ann

    G. Panati, Triviality of Bloch and Bloch–Dirac bundles, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e8, 995 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    Brouder, G

    C. Brouder, G. Panati, M. Calandra, C. Mourougane, and N. Marzari, Exponential localization of Wannier functions in insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 046402 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    J. E. Avron, R. Seiler, and B. Simon, Homotopy and quantization in condensed matter physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 51 (1983)

    1983

  22. [30]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. van Elst, and H. Schulz-Baldes, The 16 noncommutative geometry of the quantum hall effect, J. Math. Phys.35, 5373 (1994)

    1994

  23. [31]

    L. Lin, Y. Ke, L. Zhang, and C. Lee, Calculations of the chern number: Equivalence of real-space and twisted- boundary-condition formulas, Phys. Rev. B108, 174204 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Shiina, F

    T. Shiina, F. Hamano, and T. Fukui, Real-space repre- sentation of the second chern number, Phys. Rev. B111, 245135 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Graf and F

    A. Graf and F. Pi´ echon, Berry curvature and quantum metric inn-band systems: An eigenprojector approach, Phys. Rev. B104, 085114 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Mera and J

    B. Mera and J. Mitscherling, Nontrivial quantum geom- etry of degenerate flat bands, Phys. Rev. B106, 165133 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Avdoshkin and F

    A. Avdoshkin and F. K. Popov, Extrinsic geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. B107, 245136 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Avdoshkin, Geometry of degenerate quantum states, configurations ofm-planes and invariants on complex Grassmannians (2024), arXiv:2404.03234 [quant-ph]

    A. Avdoshkin, Geometry of degenerate quantum states, configurations ofm-planes and invariants on complex Grassmannians (2024), arXiv:2404.03234 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Mitscherling, A

    J. Mitscherling, A. Avdoshkin, and J. E. Moore, Gauge- invariant projector calculus for quantum state geometry and applications to observables in crystals, Phys. Rev. B 112, 085104 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    M. A. Oancea, T. B. Mieling, and G. Palumbo, Quantum geometric tensors from sub-bundle geometry, Quantum 10, 1965 (2026)

    2026

  31. [39]

    Huang and D

    S.-M. Huang and D. Giataganas, Exploring Grass- mann manifolds in topological systems via quantum dis- tance, Phys. Rev. B 10.1103/qdv4-79lc (2026), in press, arXiv:2412.20046 [quant-ph]

    2026

  32. [40]

    Bouhon, A

    A. Bouhon, A. Timmel, and R.-J. Slager, Quan- tum geometry beyond projective single bands (2023), arXiv:2303.02180 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Z. Liu, B. Mera, M. Fujimoto, T. Ozawa, and J. Wang, Theory of generalized landau levels and its implications for non-Abelian states, Phys. Rev. X15, 031019 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Bendokat, R

    T. Bendokat, R. Zimmermann, and P.-A. Absil, A Grass- mann manifold handbook: Basic geometry and compu- tational aspects, Adv. Comput. Math.50, 6 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Mera and T

    B. Mera and T. Ozawa, K¨ ahler geometry and chern in- sulators: Relations between topology and the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B104, 045104 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Mera and T

    B. Mera and T. Ozawa, Engineering geometrically flat chern bands with fubini-study k¨ ahler structure, Phys. Rev. B104, 115160 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Huang, A gauss-bonnet theorem for quantum states: Gauss curvature and topology in the projective hilbert space (2025), arXiv:2510.15760 [quant-ph]

    S.-M. Huang, A gauss-bonnet theorem for quantum states: Gauss curvature and topology in the projective hilbert space (2025), arXiv:2510.15760 [quant-ph]

    2025

  38. [46]

    J. M. Lee,Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 176 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Ozawa and B

    T. Ozawa and B. Mera, Relations between topology and the quantum metric for chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045103 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, and B. A. Bernevig, Univer- sal Wilson loop bound of quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 086401 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Chen, Quantum geometrical properties of topological materials, J

    W. Chen, Quantum geometrical properties of topological materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 025605 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    M. V. Berry, The quantum phase, five years after, inGeo- metric Phases in Physics, Advanced Series in Mathemat- ical Physics, Vol. 5, edited by A. Shapere and F. Wilczek (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989) pp. 7–28

    1989

  44. [52]

    Resta, Manifestations of Berry’s phase in molecules and condensed matter, J

    R. Resta, Manifestations of Berry’s phase in molecules and condensed matter, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter12, R107 (2000)

    2000

  45. [53]

    Batzies, K

    E. Batzies, K. H¨ uper, L. Machado, and F. S. Leite, Geo- metric mean and geodesic regression on Grassmannians, Linear Algebra Appl.466, 83 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Bargmann, Note on Wigner’s Theorem on Symmetry Operations, J

    V. Bargmann, Note on Wigner’s Theorem on Symmetry Operations, J. Math. Phys.5, 862 (1964)

    1964

  47. [55]

    Simon and N

    R. Simon and N. Mukunda, Bargmann invariant and the geometry of the g¨ uoy effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 880 (1993)

    1993

  48. [56]

    S. R. Hassan, R. Shankar, and A. Chakrabarti, Quantum geometry of correlated many-body states, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235134 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Zhang, B

    L. Zhang, B. Xie, and B. Li, Geometry of sets of Bargmann invariants, Phys. Rev. A111, 042417 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Neupert and F

    T. Neupert and F. Schindler, Topological crystalline in- sulators, inTopological Matter(Springer International Publishing, 2018) pp. 31–61

    2018

  51. [59]

    Bradlyn and M

    B. Bradlyn and M. Iraola, Lecture notes on berry phases and topology, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 51 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    J. E. Avron, L. Sadun, J. Segert, and B. Simon, Chern numbers, quaternions, and Berry’s phases in Fermi sys- tems, Commun. Math. Phys.124, 595 (1989)

    1989

  54. [62]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    B. A. Bernevig,Topological insulators and topological su- perconductors(Princeton university press, 2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Topological invariants of time-reversal-invariant band structures, Phys. Rev. B75, 121306(R) (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.