Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 59 references

Scenix: Sparse-View 3D Scene Reconstruction via Executable Scene Programs

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A fine-tuned vision-language model can turn one to ten uncalibrated photos into an executable and editable 3D scene program.

desk verdict A genuinely new task and dataset for sparse-view editable 3D scenes, but the load-bearing metric-scale assumption is unverified; send to review with a demand for a scale-isolation experiment. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07012 v1 pith:ODF5HUAI submitted 2026-08-07 cs.CV

Kai Li , Lutao Jiang , Zhenyang Li , Jiayu Dong , Jierui Zhang , Yingda Yin , Runze Zhang , Kai Yan
show 5 more authors
Xiaoyang Huang Keyang Luo Xin Wang Xiangyu Zhao Weikai Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords sparse-view3Dreconstructionexecutablesceneprogramlayoutpredictionvision-languagemodelindoordatasetobjectgroundingeditinguncalibratedRGBviews
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that sparse-view 3D indoor scene reconstruction can be solved by treating it as direct prediction of an executable scene program, a structured text description of the room boundary and each object's category, appearance, position, extent, rotation, and support, rather than as staged detection, depth lifting, and association. It claims that a fine-tuned vision-language model, given one to ten uncalibrated RGB images, can autoregressively output such a program in one pass and that this representation reconstructs layouts more accurately than single-view baselines while remaining editable at the object level. To supply the missing supervision, the paper constructs XScene, a dataset of about 110,000 synthetic and real indoor scenes with observation-consistent targets, so a model learns to reconstruct only entities visible in the selected views. A reader should care because success would mean a casual photo burst of a room, with no camera poses, depth, masks, or floor plans, could become a structured and editable 3D environment.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the executable scene program, a constrained JSON schema that separates a blueprint (room boundary and wall height) from object records that couple semantic descriptions with metric transformations. The pipeline has three mechanisms: LayoutVLM, a fine-tuned vision-language model that autoregressively predicts the program from a variable number of views in a single pass; the Asset Grounder, which builds an evidence-backed multiview inventory, reconciles it with the predicted seeds through retention, replacement, suppression, and cloning decisions, and uses selected visual evidence to condition open-vocabulary asset generation; and a bounded Residual Critic-Editor-Verify loop that renders a metric bird's-eye proxy, converts discrepancies into object-specific testable clauses, proposes minimal translation, rotation, or resize edits, and verifies each edit on a fresh rendering until all clauses pass or the iteration budget ends. Together these separate structural induction from asset realization, so where objects are and what they look like can be corrected independently.

What would settle it

Render the same known room from different camera heights, focal lengths, and capture distances, feed each rendering set through Scenix, and measure the predicted wall height and object extents: if the absolute metric outputs shift systematically with camera intrinsics or capture distance, the learned metric prior is not actually recovering scale from images. A second check is to compare predicted centers and extents against ground truth in meters without any best-fit global alignment; if errors concentrate in a single scale factor, the evaluation's alignment step is hiding the failure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that reconstruction from sparse uncalibrated RGB views reduces to conditional generation of a scene program: LayoutVLM models a distribution over serialized JSON programs given the input views and autoregressively emits a blueprint (polygonal boundary and wall height) plus a list of individually addressable object records (category, long-form description, 3D center, extent, rotation, and support relation). The program is executable because it can be rendered as a canonical coarse 3D layout, populated with generated assets, verified through canonical projections, and edited object-by-object. The paper reports that on single-view out-of-distribution SpatialGen scenes this direct program prediction reaches F1@5% of 0.355 for the 9B model and 0.287 for the 4B model, against 0.192 to 0.207 for detection-based reconstruction baselines sharing the same 2D front end, and that it recovers objects that are fully occluded and therefore undetectable. On multiview out-of-distribution scenes, the full pipeline raises F1@5% over raw predictions by 34.0% (9B) and 48.3% (4B), with the evidence-based Asset Grounder reconciliation contributing most of the gain.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that metric 3D scale and absolute placement can be recovered from a handful of uncalibrated RGB images by learned priors alone, with no camera, depth, or scale estimation anywhere in the pipeline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reconstruction no longer needs external geometric priors: no camera calibration, depth, point clouds, floor plans, or annotated masks are required at inference time.
  • Direct program prediction avoids the compounding error chain of segmentation-then-lifting and can recover entities that are fully occluded or absent from 2D detections.
  • The executable program gives a natural editing interface: changing a JSON field moves, resizes, rotates, or replaces an object while the scene remains a valid structured layout.
  • Model scale in the LayoutVLM primarily improves spatial localization rather than class-level inventory, suggesting layout accuracy is the capacity-limited part of the task.
  • Observation-consistent supervision forces the model to reconstruct only what is visible, keeping reconstruction separate from unconstrained scene hallucination.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same scene-program interface could support incremental editing: a user or language model could modify one object record and re-run only the verification loop instead of regenerating the whole scene, which the paper does not evaluate.
  • A controlled experiment that re-renders one scene under different camera heights, focal lengths, and capture distances would isolate whether the learned metric prior transfers across camera intrinsics; the paper reports no such experiment, so scale robustness remains the open risk.
  • Because evaluation removes global translation and rotation before computing distances, systematic scale errors could be masked; reporting absolute metric errors in meters would sharpen comparison against pointmap- and depth-based reconstruction.
  • If the representation generalizes, it could act as a compact bridge between vision-language models and 3D simulators, since the program is a text description a simulator can instantiate directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents Scenix, a system that reconstructs editable 3D indoor scenes from one to ten uncalibrated RGB images by predicting an 'executable scene program'—a JSON representation containing room boundary, wall height, and per-object category, description, 3D center, extent, rotation, and support—and then instantiating it via an asset grounder and a Critic-Editor-Verify loop. The authors introduce XScene, a dataset of roughly 110K synthetic and real scenes with multiview imagery and metric program annotations, and an observation-consistent supervision protocol. Experiments evaluate raw program prediction on held-out InfiniGen and SUN RGB-D splits, zero-shot transfer to 48 OOD SpatialGen scenes, ablation of the refinement stages, and comparison with three single-view baselines on a shared detection front end. The central claim is that direct autoregressive scene-program generation gives more accurate scene layouts than existing single-view reconstruction baselines while preserving object-level editability.

Significance. The executable-scene-program representation is a genuinely useful idea: it makes the reconstruction object-addressable and editable while decoupling structure from asset realization. The XScene dataset is a substantial resource for training and evaluating such models, and the observation-consistent supervision protocol is a sensible way to avoid supervising hidden objects. The paper's claims are evaluated against held-out scenes rather than fitted quantities, so I see no circularity. The stage-wise ablation on SpatialGen clearly attributes most of the OOD gain to the Asset Grounder, which is informative. That said, the headline claim of metric layout recovery from uncalibrated RGB rests on a learned scale prior that is never isolated, and the external comparison is too narrow to support the broad 'more accurate than existing approaches' statement. These are fixable with additional experiments.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Eqs. (2)–(3); §5.2] The central claim that Scenix recovers metric room dimensions and object centers from uncalibrated RGB is not supported by a scale-isolation experiment. A global scaling of scene geometry and camera focal length produces pixel-identical input, so a deterministic model must rely on a learned prior to output the correct metric program. Eq. (2) and the supervision in Eq. (3) train on absolute annotations, and roughly 91% of training cases are InfiniGen synthetic; the paper provides no controlled experiment that varies scene scale while holding appearance constant. In addition, the localization F1 metric in §5.2 normalizes center distance by room diagonal; please state whether the denominator uses the predicted or ground-truth room diagonal, because this determines whether global scale errors are penalized at all. A concrete test would render XScene or SpatialGen scenes at, e.g., 0.8× and 1.2× scale with adjusted camera intrinsics and report absolute room-dimension error, 3D IoU, and F1@5% under both normalization choices.
  2. [§5.3, Table 3; §5.5, Table 5] The contribution claim of 'more accurate scene layout reconstruction than existing approaches' is broader than the evidence. Table 3 reports only the 4B and 9B variants on the in-domain splits; no prior method is evaluated on the XScene test sets or on multi-view inputs. Table 5 is the only external comparison, and it is restricted to a single-view subset of the synthetic OOD SpatialGen data with a shared detection front end. Please add at least one representative prior method on the in-domain splits, or qualify the headline claims to the single-view OOD setting.
  3. [Table 5] Table 5 appears incomplete: the Gen3DSR and 3D-Fixer rows are missing several metric cells (e.g., Gen3DSR has no reported 3D IoU, and 3D-Fixer lacks most class-level metrics), and no standard deviations or per-scene counts are reported for the baseline columns. Without these values and a statement of how many scenes were used, the claimed margins over SAM3D, Gen3DSR, and 3D-Fixer cannot be fully verified.
  4. [§4.1; §5.3] The SUN RGB-D test split is drawn from the same real-image source used for training, so it does not test cross-dataset transfer of the metric-scale prior to real-world rooms. The only OOD evaluation is on 48 synthetic SpatialGen scenes. As a consequence, the paper does not yet demonstrate that the learned size prior transfers across real-world distributions with systematically different room and object dimensions. A small real-world cross-dataset evaluation, or an explicit limitation statement, is needed to scope the claims.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§5.2] The class-pattern filter is described only by examples (lights, tableware, books, wall ornaments, hardware); please provide the exact category list and a sensitivity analysis, since all reported metrics depend on this filter.
  2. [§3.2] The visibility threshold κ is fixed; an ablation over κ would clarify how observation-consistent supervision affects downstream results.
  3. [§4.1] The coordinate transformation for SUN RGB-D boxes is described only briefly; specify the world-frame convention and how the camera-to-world transform is obtained for single images.
  4. [§4.1] The text mentions 'Hunyuan-turbo' but does not cite it in the reference list; please add the appropriate citation.
  5. [Figure 4] Figure 4(a) shows qualitative successes but the mentioned ambiguities (reflection, rotation, diagonal symmetry, category errors) are not quantified; consider reporting per-case metrics for the displayed examples.
  6. [§5.4] The paper does not report inference time or compute for LayoutVLM and the Critic-Editor-Verify loop; given the agentic nature of the loop, this information would help readers judge practicality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: supervised predictions are tested on held-out and OOD data; the unverified metric-scale prior is a correctness concern, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

Scenix is an empirical systems paper. LayoutVLM is trained by Eq. (3) on XScene targets derived from ground-truth blueprints and observation-consistent object sets, then evaluated on held-out XScene cases, real SUN RGB-D images, and out-of-distribution SpatialGen scenes, with metrics computed against independent ground truths. The refinement loop in Eq. (5) is a closed-loop process with a deterministic footprint and blueprint verifier, not a fitted predictor. I find no step where a fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work, and no load-bearing self-citation; the co-authored ControlRoom3D reference appears only in related work. The paper itself notes a genuine limitation in Fig. 4 ('reflection, rotation, or diagonal-symmetry ambiguity because camera relationships are not modeled'), and the unverified assumption that learned priors supply metric scale from uncalibrated RGB is a real identifiability and validity concern. However, it is not a circular reduction: Eq. (2)-(3) are standard supervised learning, and the predictions are not constructed from the evaluation targets. No specific circular step can be exhibited from the paper's text, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a supervised dataset whose construction involves hand-chosen thresholds (kappa, class filter, localization tau) and on the assumption that a VLM can directly regress metric 3D layout from uncalibrated images. None of these premises is derived or independently validated; together they determine most of the reported performance.

free parameters (4)
  • visibility threshold kappa (number of oriented-box corners that must be visible) = not stated numerically
    Controls which objects are retained in observation-consistent training targets (Eq. 3). A too-low threshold keeps barely-visible objects; a too-high threshold removes detectable objects, directly shaping the learned inventory and the F1 ceiling.
  • fixed class-pattern filter list = lights, tableware, books, wall ornaments, hardware
    Excludes small decorative objects from all reported metrics (Section 5.2). Applied uniformly to predictions and ground truth, but it hides any layout errors on these classes and affects absolute F1 and IoU values.
  • localization F1 thresholds tau = 5% and 10% of room diagonal
    Defines true-positive matching. The choice of tau substantially changes F1 values and is an evaluation knob, not a prediction.
  • iteration budget for Critic-Editor-Verify loop = not stated
    Loop termination includes a fixed iteration budget; the reported refined results depend on this budget and on the edit proposal policy, neither of which is quantified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption InfiniGen procedural scenes provide valid ground-truth room structure, object extents, and appearance descriptions.
    About 91% of training cases come from InfiniGen; any bias in the procedural distribution (room types, object scales, viewpoint coverage) is learned by LayoutVLM and carried into real-world predictions.
  • domain assumption SUN RGB-D 3D box annotations, after transformation to a common world frame and geometric correction, are accurate enough to serve as metric ground truth.
    The paper notes annotations may contain pose errors and applies corrections (Section 4.1), but no verification or uncertainty is reported for these targets.
  • domain assumption Object visibility via a corner-count threshold with ground-plane sightline is a faithful proxy for reconstructability.
    The observation-consistent protocol (Section 3.2) defines which objects are supervised; objects fully occluded by other objects may still pass the ground-plane check, so the target inventory may not match actual visual evidence.
  • domain assumption Absolute metric scale is recoverable from uncalibrated images by learned priors.
    No camera, depth, or scale estimation is used at inference (Section 3.2, Eq. 2); the model must regress metric centers and extents from appearance and memorized object-size statistics.
  • domain assumption A deterministic serializer and supervised fine-tuning on assistant tokens is a valid way to teach a VLM to emit scene programs.
    The training objective (Eq. 3) assumes that autoregressive token prediction over the serialized JSON is the right interface for metric scene structure; this is a pragmatic choice, not a proven one.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scenix: Sparse-View 3D Scene Reconstruction via Executable Scene Programs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ODF5HUAI

@misc{pith2026260807012,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scenix: Sparse-View 3D Scene Reconstruction via Executable Scene Programs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ODF5HUAI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07012}
}
read the original abstract

Synthesizing a structured and editable 3D indoor scene from a few uncalibrated RGB views requires more than generating high-quality individual assets: a system must infer the room structure, associate objects across incomplete observations, and recover a globally consistent spatial configuration. Previous methods mainly focus on 3D scene generation with text input or require continuous visual inputs with additional priors, \ e.g., human-annotated masks or accurate 3D layouts, which makes these methods labor demanding and hard to apply in general cases. We present \textsc{Scenix}, a sparse-view 3D scene reconstruction framework via executable scene programs, a structured representation that can be directly instantiated into editable 3D scenes. Given sparse views, \textsc{Scenix} predicts executable scene programs through perception-grounded asset instantiation and closed-loop spatial refinement. % We present \method, a framework that predicts an executable scene representation from sparse views and realizes it through perception-grounded asset instantiation and closed-loop spatial refinement. To support this task, we construct \dataset, a dataset of approximately 110,000 synthetic and real indoor scenes with multiview imagery, room structures, object-centric descriptions, and metric spatial annotations. We further introduce observation-consistent supervision that aligns each target scene with the visual evidence available in its input views. Experiments on held-out \textsc{XScene} scenes, real indoor images, and out-of-distribution SpatialGen cases evaluate structured scene prediction, object grounding, and spatial refinement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07012 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scenix directly transforms sparse uncalibrated RGB observations into an executable 3D scene program and realizes it as a structured, editable indoor environment. Abstract Synthesizing a structured and editable 3D indoor scene from a few uncalibrated RGB views requires more than generat￾ing high-quality individual assets: a system must infer the room structure, associate objects across incomplete obser￾vations, and r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of Scenix. LayoutVLM predicts an executable scene program from sparse RGB observations; Asset Grounder associates observed instances with scene entities and conditions open-vocabulary asset generation, and these visual evidences together with texts will be used to generate 3D assets; Residual Critic–Editor–Verify Loop performs closed-loop refinement under deterministic geometric constraints, and finally exp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Construction of XScene. Synthetic and real-image sources provide complementary appearance and structural diversity, while cross-view visibility aggregation aligns each supervision target with the evidence available in its selected observations. rooms, and export their room envelopes and object cate￾gories, positions, extents, and orientations. For each room, a blueprint-aware camera trajectory renders ten RGB im￾age… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative results of Scenix across in-domain, real-image, and out-of-distribution scenes. footprint’s rotational symmetry (180◦ for rectangular and 90◦ for near-square footprints), avoiding penalties for equivalent orientations. Unless noted otherwise, a fixed class-…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =

    Wang, Xinpeng and Yeshwanth, Chandan and Nie. 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Hi3dgen: High-fidelity 3d geometry generation from images via normal bridging , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    work page

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Sam 3d: 3dfy anything in images , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  4. [4]

    NaLA: A 3D Native LLM Layout Agent for High-quality 3D Scene Generation

    NaLA: A 3D Native LLM Layout Agent for High-quality 3D Scene Generation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.29395 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15442 , year=

    Hunyuan3d 2.1: From images to high-fidelity 3d assets with production-ready pbr material , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15442 , year=

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Simulating the Real World: A Unified Survey of Multimodal Generative Models , year=

    Hu, Yuqi and Wang, Longguang and Liu, Xian and Chen, Ling-Hao and Guo, Yuwei and Shi, Yukai and Liu, Ce and Rao, Anyi and Wang, Zeyu and Xiong, Hui , journal=. Simulating the Real World: A Unified Survey of Multimodal Generative Models , year=

    work page

  7. [7]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Paschalidou, Despoina and Kar, Amlan and Shugrina, Maria and Kreis, Karsten and Geiger, Andreas and Fidler, Sanja , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  8. [8]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Partcraft: Crafting creative objects by parts , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Tang, Jiapeng and Nie, Yinyu and Markhasin, Lev and Dai, Angela and Thies, Justus and Nie. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  2. [10]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Feng, Weixi and Zhu, Wanrong and Fu, Tsu-Jui and Jampani, Varun and Akula, Arjun and He, Xuehai and Basu, Sugato and Wang, Xin Eric and Wang, William Yang , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  3. [11]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Yang, Yue and Sun, Fan-Yun and Weihs, Luca and VanderBilt, Eli and Herrasti, Alvaro and Han, Winson and Wu, Jiajun and Haber, Nick and Krishna, Ranjay and Liu, Lingjie and Callison-Burch, Chris and Yatskar, Mark and Kembhavi, Aniruddha and Clark, Christopher , title =. Proceed...

  4. [12]

    Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024 , series =

    Fu, Rao and Wen, Zehao and Liu, Zichen and Sridhar, Srinath , title =. Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024 , series =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  5. [13]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

    Open world entity segmentation , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  6. [14]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Schult, Jonas and Tsai, Sam and H. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  7. [15]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Jain, Jitesh and Li, Jiachen and Chiu, Mang Tik and Hassani, Ali and Orlov, Nikita and Shi, Humphrey , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2023 , pages =

    2023

  8. [16]

    ECCV , year=

    Open-Vocabulary SAM: Segment and Recognize Twenty-thousand Classes Interactively , author=. ECCV , year=

  9. [17]

    arXiv preprint , year=

    Mamba or RWKV: Exploring High-Quality and High-Efficiency Segment Anything Model , author=. arXiv preprint , year=

  10. [18]

    2026 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =

    Fang, Chuan and Li, Heng and Liang, Yixun and Zheng, Jia and Mao, Yongsen and Liu, Yuan and Tang, Rui and Zhou, Zihan and Tan, Ping , title =. 2026 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  11. [19]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Yang, Yandan and Jia, Baoxiong and Zhang, Shujie and Huang, Siyuan , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  12. [20]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Nie, Yinyu and Han, Xiaoguang and Guo, Shihui and Zheng, Yujian and Chang, Jian and Zhang, Jian Jun , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  13. [21]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    G. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  14. [22]

    , title =

    Wu, Qirui and Iliash, Denys and Ritchie, Daniel and Savva, Manolis and Chang, Angel X. , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages =

  15. [23]

    Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024 , series =

    Avetisyan, Armen and Xie, Christopher and Howard-Jenkins, Henry and Yang, Tsun-Yi and Aroudj, Samir and Patra, Suvam and Zhang, Fuyang and Frost, Duncan and Holland, Luke and Orme, Campbell and Engel, Jakob and Miller, Edward and Newcombe, Richard and Balntas, Vasileios , titl...

    2024

  16. [24]

    and Mildenhall, Ben and Sajjadi, Mehdi S

    Niemeyer, Michael and Barron, Jonathan T. and Mildenhall, Ben and Sajjadi, Mehdi S. M. and Geiger, Andreas and Radwan, Noha , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  17. [25]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Yang, Jiawei and Pavone, Marco and Wang, Yue , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  18. [26]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Wang, Shuzhe and Leroy, Vincent and Cabon, Yohann and Chidlovskii, Boris and Revaud, J. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  19. [27]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Chen, Boyuan and Xu, Zhuo and Kirmani, Sean and Ichter, Brian and Sadigh, Dorsa and Guibas, Leonidas and Xia, Fei , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  20. [28]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Cheng, An-Chieh and Yin, Hongxu and Fu, Yang and Guo, Qiushan and Yang, Ruihan and Kautz, Jan and Wang, Xiaolong and Liu, Sifei , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  21. [29]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Hong, Yining and Zhen, Haoyu and Chen, Peihao and Zheng, Shuhong and Du, Yilun and Chen, Zhenfang and Gan, Chuang , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  22. [30]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Chen, Sijin and Chen, Xin and Zhang, Chi and Li, Mingsheng and Yu, Gang and Fei, Hao and Zhu, Hongyuan and Fan, Jiayuan and Chen, Tao , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  23. [31]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Sun, Fan-Yun and Liu, Weiyu and Gu, Siyi and Lim, Dylan and Bhat, Goutam and Tombari, Federico and Li, Manling and Haber, Nick and Wu, Jiajun , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  24. [32]

    2026 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =

    Meng, Yanxu and Wu, Haoning and Zhang, Ya and Xie, Weidi , title =. 2026 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  25. [33]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Yin, Ze-Xin and Liu, Liu and Wang, Xinjie and Sui, Wei and Su, Zhizhong and Yang, Jian and Xie, Jin , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  26. [34]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Shi, Yukai and Li, Weiyu and Wang, Zihao and Li, Hongyang and Chen, Xingyu and Tan, Ping and Zhang, Lei , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  27. [35]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Xia, Hongchi and Li, Xuan and Li, Zhaoshuo and Ma, Qianli and Xu, Jiashu and Liu, Ming-Yu and Cui, Yin and Lin, Tsung-Yi and Ma, Wei-Chiu and Wang, Shenlong and Song, Shuran and Wei, Fangyin , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog...

  28. [36]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Noh, Seongrae and Seo, SeungWon and Park, Gyeong-Moon and Kang, HyeongYeop , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  29. [37]

    Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Zou, Chuhang and Colburn, Alex and Shan, Qi and Hoiem, Derek , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  30. [38]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Sun, Cheng and Hsiao, Chi-Wei and Sun, Min and Chen, Hwann-Tzong , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  31. [39]

    Computer Vision -- ECCV 2020 , series =

    Pintore, Giovanni and Agus, Marco and Gobbetti, Enrico , title =. Computer Vision -- ECCV 2020 , series =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  32. [40]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Yue, Yuanwen and Kontogianni, Theodora and Schindler, Konrad and Engelmann, Francis , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  33. [41]

    Grounding Image Matching in 3D with

    Leroy, Vincent and Cabon, Yohann and Revaud, J. Grounding Image Matching in 3D with. Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024 , pages =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  34. [42]

    2025 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =

    Wang, Hengyi and Agapito, Lourdes , title =. 2025 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  35. [43]

    and Kanazawa, Angjoo , title =

    Wang, Qianqian and Zhang, Yifei and Holynski, Aleksander and Efros, Alexei A. and Kanazawa, Angjoo , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  36. [44]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Wang, Jianyuan and Chen, Minghao and Karaev, Nikita and Vedaldi, Andrea and Rupprecht, Christian and Novotny, David , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  37. [45]

    Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024 , pages =

    Wang, Zhengyi and Wang, Yikai and Chen, Yifei and Xiang, Chendong and Chen, Shuo and Yu, Dajiang and Li, Chongxuan and Su, Hang and Zhu, Jun , title =. Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024 , pages =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  38. [46]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Liu, Minghua and Xu, Chao and Jin, Haian and Chen, Linghao and T, Mukund Varma and Xu, Zexiang and Su, Hao , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  39. [47]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Wu, Kailu and Liu, Fangfu and Cai, Zhihan and Yan, Runjie and Wang, Hanyang and Hu, Yating and Duan, Yueqi and Ma, Kaisheng , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  40. [48]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    Hypersim: A photorealistic synthetic dataset for holistic indoor scene understanding , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

  41. [49]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Xiang, Jianfeng and Lv, Zelong and Xu, Sicheng and Deng, Yu and Wang, Ruicheng and Zhang, Bowen and Chen, Dong and Tong, Xin and Yang, Jiaolong , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  42. [50]

    and Xiao, Jianxiong , title =

    Song, Shuran and Lichtenberg, Samuel P. and Xiao, Jianxiong , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  43. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06158 , year=

    Matterport3d: Learning from rgb-d data in indoor environments , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06158 , year=

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Scannet++: A high-fidelity dataset of 3d indoor scenes , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  45. [53]

    and Savva, Manolis and Halber, Maciej and Funkhouser, Thomas and Nie

    Dai, Angela and Chang, Angel X. and Savva, Manolis and Halber, Maciej and Funkhouser, Thomas and Nie. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  46. [54]

    Computer Vision -- ECCV 2020 , series =

    Zheng, Jia and Zhang, Junfei and Li, Jing and Tang, Rui and Gao, Shenghua and Zhou, Zihan , title =. Computer Vision -- ECCV 2020 , series =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  47. [55]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages =

    Fu, Huan and Cai, Bowen and Gao, Lin and Zhang, Ling-Xiao and Wang, Jiaming and Li, Cao and Zeng, Qixun and Sun, Chengyue and Jia, Rongfei and Zhao, Binqiang and Zhang, Hao , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages =

  48. [56]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.22972 , abstract =

    Schneider, Manuel-Andreas and Dai, Angela , month = mar, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.22972 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    doi:10.1145/3610548.3618165 , language =

    Yan, Kai and Luan, Fujun and Hašan, Miloš and Groueix, Thibault and Deschaintre, Valentin and Zhao, Shuang , month = dec, year =. doi:10.1145/3610548.3618165 , language =

  50. [58]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.03421 , abstract =

    Ardelean, Andreea and Özer, Mert and Egger, Bernhard , month = mar, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.03421 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    Infinite

    Raistrick, Alexander and Lipson, Lahav and Ma, Zeyu and Mei, Lingjie and Wang, Mingzhe and Zuo, Yiming and Kayan, Karhan and Wen, Hongyu and Han, Beining and Wang, Yihan and Newell, Alejandro and Law, Hei and Goyal, Ankit and Yang, Kaiyu and Deng, Jia , month = jun, year =. In...

    doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.