Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 80 references

Out-of-equilibrium spin-valley dynamics of ferromagnets in topological Chern bands

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Optically written magnetic domains in Chern insulators decay by thermal melting in place, not by shrinking, giving spin-valley relaxation times orders of magnitude longer than in ferromagnetic metals.

desk verdict Solid experimental paper on domain relaxation in t-MoTe2; the shrinking-vs-melting distinction holds up, but 'thermal activation' is asserted, not directly measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07041 v1 pith:64W46YLY submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

J. James , I. Krastilevskiy , F. Pichler , L. Wang , A. Iafarova , F. Menzel , K. Watanabe , T. Taniguchi
show 3 more authors
C. Kuhlenkamp M. Knap T. Smoleński
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords twistedMoTe2bilayersspin-valleydynamicsCherninsulatorfractionalmagneticdomainrelaxationnegativespinstiffnesswallsopticalcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how topology and strong correlations change the way a ferromagnet relaxes after being knocked out of equilibrium. It claims that in twisted MoTe2 bilayers, a laser-written magnetic domain embedded in an integer or fractional Chern insulating state decays by a thermal melting process, meaning local spin flips over an energy barrier, whereas in a nearby ferromagnetic metal the same domain shrinks inward from its edge. The difference in mechanism shows up as a size-dependent plateau in the metallic relaxation traces that is absent in the insulators, and as orders-of-magnitude longer spin lifetimes in the Chern states. If the claim is right, the topological character of a band determines not just static order but the very pathway by which collective spin order decays far from equilibrium.

What carries the argument

The central object is the magnetic domain wall, studied through stochastic time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau / Model A dynamics for a non-conserved Ising order parameter, with free energy f[m] = V[m] + κ2|∇m|^2 + ... . The potential V[m] and the stiffness κ2 come from a mean-field lattice model of the two topmost hole bands of twisted MoTe2. In the ferromagnetic metal κ2 is positive, giving wide tanh-shaped walls; near the Chern insulator a self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculation yields κ2 < 0 with a stabilizing κ4 > 0, giving very sharp walls attributed to topologically protected chiral edge modes. Sharp walls suppress domain shrinking, leaving thermal activation over the barrier Δvac between false and true vacuum as the dominant relaxation channel.

What would settle it

Direct imaging of a magnetic domain wall near ν = −1 with sub-100-nm resolution (for example, a scanning magnetometry probe) would settle the mechanism: if the wall is broad and tanh-like, or if relaxation traces acquire an initial plateau when the initial domain is enlarged, then shrinking is not suppressed and the negative-stiffness mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports that a focused circularly polarized light pulse can create a metastable micrometer-sized magnetic domain in twisted MoTe2 bilayers, polarized against the external magnetic field, and that the domain's decay is qualitatively different depending on whether the host is a ferromagnetic metal or a Chern insulator. In the metal, the domain collapses by shrinking inward from its perimeter, producing a decay trace with a plateau whose duration grows with initial domain size. In the integer and fractional Chern insulators, the domain instead decays by thermally activated local spin flips that melt it in place, producing size-independent exponential traces and relaxation times orders of magnitude longer. The authors trace this to the domain-wall structure: metallic walls are broad tanh-like walls with positive spin stiffness, whereas near the Chern insulator the spin stiffness is negative and the walls are sharp, suppressing domain-edge motion.

Load-bearing premise

The sharp-wall, negative-stiffness picture of the Chern domain comes from a mean-field lattice calculation and is not directly resolved in the experiment; the fractional Chern case is presumed to behave likewise by analogy, because the mean-field treatment cannot describe fractionalization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At magnetic fields just above the coercive field, optically written spin domains in integer and fractional Chern insulators outlive metallic domains by orders of magnitude because the shrinking channel is suppressed.
  • Relaxation traces in Chern insulators remain exponential and independent of initial domain size, whereas metallic traces show an initial plateau whose duration scales with the initial domain diameter.
  • At high fields, roughly B/Bc > 2–3, the energy barrier Δvac is closed and all phases relax on similar tens-of-microseconds timescales set by intervalley spin processes.
  • At zero field, small seed bubbles are stable in Chern insulators but unstable in ferromagnetic metals, producing an abrupt power threshold for writing metallic domains and a smooth power dependence for Chern insulating domains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the negative stiffness is a general consequence of chiral edge states on domain walls, the same melting-versus-shrinking distinction should appear in other flat-band Chern ferromagnets, not only in the MoTe2 family; this is a testable prediction for other moiré systems.
  • The measured relaxation time could serve as a non-invasive probe of the activation barrier Δvac, since τrelax ∼ Γ−1 exp(Δvac/kBT), so sweeping the magnetic field would map the barrier directly even where it cannot be resolved optically.
  • Sub-diffraction imaging of the domain-wall profile, which the paper notes its optical maps cannot resolve, would be the direct test of whether near-ν = −1 walls are genuinely sharp and negative-stiffness in origin.
  • For fractional Chern insulators the mechanism is assumed by analogy because the mean-field treatment cannot capture fractionalization; a future theory including fractionalized edge modes would show whether the protection is stronger or weaker than at the integer state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports time- and space-resolved magneto-optical experiments on twisted MoTe2 bilayers. A focused circularly polarized pump pulse creates a local spin-valley domain opposite to the external field, and a weak cross-polarized probe monitors its decay. The authors find that near both the integer Chern insulator at ν≈−1 and the fractional Chern insulators at ν≈−2/3 and −3/5, relaxation is orders of magnitude slower than in ferromagnetic metals at low B/Bc, and the decay traces remain nearly exponential and independent of the initial domain size. In metallic phases, by contrast, the decay shows an initial plateau whose duration grows with the pump-beam diameter. The paper interprets this as Chern-insulator domains relaxing by homogeneous thermally activated 'melting,' while metallic domains collapse by perimeter shrinking. A time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau (model A) simulation, with the potential and stiffness taken from a mean-field Hartree–Fock treatment of an extended Haldane model, reproduces the plateau/no-plateau dichotomy and the threshold behavior of domain writing with a doughnut beam.

Significance. If the microscopic mechanism is correct, the paper establishes a qualitatively new phenomenon: band topology and strong correlations change the far-from-equilibrium relaxation pathway of ferromagnetic domains, with much longer spin lifetimes in Chern insulators. The experimental execution is careful and explicit: multiple devices and spots, probe-power non-perturbation checks, power- and size-dependent controls, and consistency across B/Bc. The theoretical work provides a concrete mean-field picture (negative spin stiffness and sharp domain walls near the ICI) that is falsifiable. The main weakness is that the central 'thermal activation' mechanism is inferred rather than directly tested, and the fractional Chern insulator part is explicitly outside the microscopic theory. These gaps are load-bearing for the mechanism claim, although they do not undermine the experimental phenomenology itself.

major comments (4)
  1. [Out-of-equilibrium spin-valley dynamics; Methods Secs. 14–15] The central mechanism, thermally activated melting, is not tested by temperature dependence. All relaxation times τ_relax are reported at the base temperature T≈1.6 K, while the model's thermal rate is Γ_thermal∼Γ exp(−Δvac/kBT). The authors already vary T from 1.6 K to 5 K to measure Bc(T) (Extended Data Fig. 14f), so a temperature sweep of τ_relax at fixed ν and B/Bc is experimentally feasible. An Arrhenius dependence ln τ ∝ Δvac/kBT would support thermal activation; a flat or weakly T-dependent τ would implicate an athermal channel (disorder creep, quantum tunneling, or light-induced relaxation) and would invalidate the 'thermal activation' part of the mechanism even if the negative-stiffness model is otherwise correct. Please either provide this measurement or explicitly soften the mechanism claim to 'consistent with thermal activation.'
  2. [Methods Sec. 14; main-text claim around Fig. 4] The mechanism for the fractional Chern insulator is asserted by analogy, not derived. Methods Sec. 14 states that the mean-field treatment 'cannot capture fractional Chern insulators directly' and that a similar domain-wall structure is 'expected.' Since the abstract and main text claim the melting mechanism applies 'in the vicinity of both integer and fractional Chern insulating states,' the FCI part of the mechanism is not backed by the microscopic calculation. The experimental traces at ν≈−2/3 and −3/5 are valid observations, but the theoretical explanation for them is an extrapolation. Please provide an FCI-capable treatment or explicitly restrict the microscopic mechanism claim to the ICI and present the FCI behavior as an empirical similarity.
  3. [Mechanisms of Spin-Valley Relaxation; Fig. 3] The 'melting' interpretation is inferred, not directly observed. The time-resolved observable is the average magnetization in a central diffraction-limited spot; internal domain nucleation is never imaged in time, and Methods Sec. 14 acknowledges that the spatial resolution cannot resolve the domain walls. The plateau in the metallic case is strong evidence for perimeter shrinking, but the absence of a plateau in the ICI could also arise from other spatially distributed decay channels, such as disorder-dominated local relaxation or a radially varying initial preparation profile, rather than uniquely from thermal nucleation of internal domains. A quantitative likelihood argument distinguishing these alternatives, or a spatially resolved time series showing homogeneous decay, would materially strengthen the central mechanism claim.
  4. [Methods Sec. 16; Fig. 2g] The paper states that the filling-factor dependence of τ_relax 'correlates with the height of the energy barrier Δvac,' but Δvac is a theoretical quantity computed from the mean-field model, not independently measured. Because the same model is used to interpret the timescales, the correlation is not an independent experimental confirmation. Please state explicitly that Δvac in Fig. 2g is a model output, and consider showing the comparison between the model's predicted τ_relax(B/Bc,ν) and the experimental values, with the unknown scale Γ stated as such.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods Sec. 14, Eq. (10)] The text refers to a higher-order gradient term 'κ4|∇m|2,' but the differential equation contains κ4∂x^4 m; a term of the form κ4|∇m|2 would be redundant with κ2|∇m|2. Please correct the notation (likely κ4|∇²m|² or the explicit fourth-order term).
  2. [Methods Sec. 16] The shrinking velocity is first written as v_B = Γ Δf κ2/σ with σ ∝ √κ2, and later as v_B ∝ B_z √κ2; the field dependence of Δf should be stated so that the two expressions are transparently consistent.
  3. [Fig. 2g; Methods Sec. 8] The probe-pulse duration used for the relaxation measurements is not specified. Since the extraction of τ_relax assumes that the probe window is long enough to reach steady state, please give the typical pulse durations and state how the exponential fits are affected in the slow-relaxation (low B/Bc) regime.
  4. [Extended Data Fig. 11 caption] The caption uses 'Expanded Beam' and 'Diffraction limited Beam' but does not specify which panel labels (a–d) correspond to which beam configuration beyond the text; a direct mapping would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the central plateau/no-plateau and B=0 domain-stability observations are independent of the fitted theory, and the theory's stiffness parameters are fitted to the model's own mean-field domain walls rather than to the relaxation data; a load-bearing but reproduced self-citation to Ref. [12] warrants score 2.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental distinctions are independent of the theory's fitted constants. The plateau in metallic relaxation and its absence near the ICI/FCI (Figs. 3a,b; Methods Sec. 9), the dependence on pump-beam diameter and power, the disappearance of the plateau at high B/Bc (Extended Data Fig. 10), and the abrupt vs. smooth B=0 domain-area growth (Fig. 4b,e) are direct observations and are never fed back into the theory as fitting targets. The theoretical model in Methods Sec. 14 computes the free energy and spin stiffness from a microscopic lattice model; the negative stiffness kappa2 < 0 for the ICI is obtained by fitting kappa2 and kappa4 to the self-consistent mean-field domain-wall profiles, not to the measured relaxation traces, so the predicted absence of domain shrinking in the ICI is not a fitted restatement of the experiment. The main self-citation is Ref. [12] (Pichler, Kuhlenkamp, Knap; overlapping authors F.P. and M.K.), which supplies the Ising/model-A dynamics and the negative-stiffness domain-wall picture; this is load-bearing for the mechanism attribution but the domain-wall calculation is reproduced in the present Methods Sec. 14 and the qualitative predictions were subsequently confirmed, so it is prior work rather than circular closure. Two explicit limitations weaken the mechanism claim but are not circularity: the FCI case is assumed by analogy ('While our mean-field treatment cannot capture fractional Chern insulators directly, we expect the domain-wall structure to be similar to the case of ICI, in agreement with our experimental observations'), and the domain walls are not directly resolved ('the spatial resolution ... is not sufficient to directly resolve the domain walls'). The absence of a measured temperature dependence of tau_relax leaves the 'thermal activation' label under-tested, but underdetermination is not equivalence-by-construction. No equation in the paper reduces a prediction to its input, and no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mechanism explanation rests on a mean-field microscopic model with several unstated or fitted parameters. The most important is the negative stiffness kappa2 in the ICI, inferred from a self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculation and not directly measured. The time scale Gamma is arbitrary, so the theory only predicts shapes, not absolute rates.

free parameters (4)
  • On-site Hubbard U = not stated
    Interaction strength in the mean-field model (Eq. 4); value not given, chosen to produce a ferromagnetic ground state and affects the free-energy potential V[m] and domain-wall structure.
  • Equilibration rate Gamma = not stated
    Sets the time scale in the model-A dynamics (Eq. 1); only shape comparisons are made, no absolute rate prediction.
  • Spin stiffness kappa2 (metal) = positive, value not stated; kappa4=0
    Fitted to self-consistently computed domain-wall profiles in the metallic phase (Methods Sec. 14); controls shrinking velocity and plateau behavior.
  • Spin stiffness kappa2 (ICI) = negative, value not stated; kappa4>0
    Fitted to mean-field domain walls in the ICI phase (Methods Sec. 14); negative sign is the key input that suppresses shrinking and makes thermal activation dominant.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Model A (time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau) dynamics with Langevin noise describes the magnetization relaxation (Eq. 1).
    Assumed to capture non-conserved order-parameter relaxation; standard in critical dynamics but not derived for this system.
  • domain assumption Ising-type scalar order parameter is justified by topological-band-induced Ising anisotropy (Methods Sec. 14).
    Suppresses spin-wave fluctuations; adopted from Ref. 12.
  • domain assumption Mean-field decoupling of the on-site Hubbard interaction is adequate to compute V[m] and domain-wall structures (Methods Eqs. 4-9).
    Used to obtain free-energy potential and stiffness; may not capture fractional Chern insulator physics.
  • domain assumption Extended Haldane model with hoppings t1=3.225, t2=-2.210, t3=-0.947 meV approximates the two topmost valence bands of t-MoTe2 at theta near 4 degrees (Methods Sec. 14).
    Taken from Ref. 62; band structure inputs.
  • domain assumption The domain-wall structure of the FCI is similar to that of the ICI (Methods Sec. 14: 'we expect the domain-wall structure to be similar to the case of ICI').
    Mean-field cannot treat FCI; the relaxation mechanism for FCI is assumed by analogy.
  • domain assumption Optical spin orientation proceeds via local spin-flip events (Methods Sec. 17).
    Used to model seed-bubble initialization; supported by Refs. 13-15 but not directly proven here.
  • domain assumption The measured coercive field Bc is smaller than Bc* at which the false-vacuum barrier closes (Methods Sec. 15).
    Necessary to interpret B/Bc>1 data as still having a metastable minimum; supported by their hysteresis simulations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Out-of-equilibrium spin-valley dynamics of ferromagnets in topological Chern bands." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/64W46YLY

@misc{pith2026260807041,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Out-of-equilibrium spin-valley dynamics of ferromagnets in topological Chern bands},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/64W46YLY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07041}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding quantum matter far from equilibrium is a central goal of modern physics. Twisted MoTe2 bilayers constitute a promising platform for exploring this frontier by combining strong Coulomb interactions, nontrivial band geometry, and optical control. Here, we exploit this setting to investigate the role of topology and many-body correlations in the out-of-equilibrium dynamics of ferromagnets in Chern bands. Using a focused circularly polarized light pulse, we create a local magnetic domain oriented opposite to an external magnetic field and directly image its subsequent spin-valley relaxation in spatially and time-resolved low-temperature experiments. We demonstrate that in the vicinity of both integer and fractional Chern insulating states, the dynamics is governed by qualitatively different mechanisms than in ferromagnetic metals. Whereas metallic domains collapse by shrinking, Chern domains melt via thermal activation, resulting in drastically different temporal spin evolution and orders-of-magnitude longer relaxation times. These findings demonstrate the influence of topology and strong correlations on far-from-equilibrium collective spin phases, opening new opportunities for dynamical control of ferromagnets in the quantum Hall regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07041 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Optical control of collective magnetic states in t-MoTe2. (a) Optical micrograph and (b) schematic of the dual-gated t-MoTe2 device A used in the main text. (c) Filling-factor evolution of the reflectance-contrast spectra, ∆R/R0, differentiated with respect to photon energy E. The spectra were acquired in the two circular polarizations at a magnetic field of B = 0.2 T. (d) Intensity of the AP transition in σ − polar… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Out-of-equilibrium spin-valley dynamics of ferromagnets in t-MoTe2. (a,b) Schematics of the pulse sequence (a) and temporal light-intensity profiles (b) used in time-resolved pump-probe spin relaxation experiments. A local magnetic domain is optically created using a σ −-polarized pump beam, which populates the false-vacuum state oriented against the equilibrium magnetization. Its subsequent relaxation towards the t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spin-valley relaxation mechanisms of Chern insulators and ferromagnetic metals. (a,b) Temporal spin relaxation profiles of ICI (ν ≈ −1; a) and metal (ν ≈ −0.8; b) acquired at a fixed B/Bc = 1.3 for magnetic domains generated with pump beams of different diameters D0, as indicated. In each case, the pump power was adjusted such that the average light intensity falling onto a central diffraction-limited probed area (m… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stability of magnetic domains in Chern insulators and metals at B = 0. (a) Theoretical simulation of steady-state spatial magnetization profiles in the ICI (top) and ferromagnetic metal (bottom), initialized with a large number Nbub of small seeds randomly distributed …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The VTI was filled with He exchange gas to ensure efficient ther- malization of the sample

    Experimental setup Our experiments were carried out in a closed-cycle cryostat equipped with a variable-temperature insert (VTI) and a superconducting magnet, allowing the sam- ple to be cooled down to 1.6 K and subjected to magnetic fields of up to 9 T perpendicular to its surface. The VTI was filled with He exchange gas to ensure efficient ther- malizat...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Exfoliation of hBN and graphite was carried out under ambient conditions, whereas MoTe2 monolayers were obtained inside an N 2- filled glovebox to preserve their high quality

    Device fabrication The devices were assembled using the flakes that were mechanically exfoliated from the bulk crystals (HQ Graphene 2H-MoTe 2, NIMS hBN, and natural graphite) onto SiO 2/Si substrates. Exfoliation of hBN and graphite was carried out under ambient conditions, whereas MoTe2 monolayers were obtained inside an N 2- filled glovebox to preserve...

    work page

  3. [3]

    4, it was critical to ensure that both the twist angle and the corresponding filling factor are uniform across a sufficiently large region

    Twist angle homogeneity in device A For the spatially resolved domain writing measure- ments shown in Fig. 4, it was critical to ensure that both the twist angle and the corresponding filling factor are uniform across a sufficiently large region. Owing to its homogeneity, Device A uniquely fulfills this requirement. To quantify the twist angle disorder in...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Gate-tunability and filling factor calibration As stated in the main text, the charge state of our de- vices is controlled by applying two voltagesV TG andV BG to the top and bottom FLG gates, while keeping thet- MoTe2 bilayer at ground potential. This enables indepen- dent control of the doping density and displacement field Dthat, according to the paral...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The resulting reflectance contrast,R c ≡∆R/R 0 = (R−R 0)/R0, was then differentiated with respect to photon energyE

    Analysis of reflectance spectra The white-light reflectance spectrumRmeasured in a given circular polarization was normalized to a co- polarized background spectrum,R 0(E), acquired away from thet-MoTe 2 region of the sample. The resulting reflectance contrast,R c ≡∆R/R 0 = (R−R 0)/R0, was then differentiated with respect to photon energyE. To reduce the ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Determination of the coercive field To precisely determine the coercive field of the hole system at a given filling factor, we perform magnetic hysteresis measurements. To avoid perturbing the spins with the probe light, these measurements are carried out using a circularly polarized, low-power (∼4 pW) single-frequency laser resonant with the AP transitio...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Efficiency and dynamics of optical spin orientation In contrast to the spin relaxation dynamics, the charac- teristic timescaleτ orient of light-induced spin orientation is only weakly dependent on the filling factor, always re- maining inversely proportional to the excitation power P(Fig. 2c). In addition, the orientation rateτ −1 orient at a givenPexhib...

    work page

  8. [8]

    These beams were subsequently passed through two fast fiber-based acousto-optic modulators (AOMs) with rise times below 10 ns

    Time-resolved pump-probe experiments To generate pump and probe pulses, a single-frequency CW laser resonant with the AP transition was first split into two beams using a fiber beam splitter. These beams were subsequently passed through two fast fiber-based acousto-optic modulators (AOMs) with rise times below 10 ns. Both AOMs were driven by synchronized ...

    work page

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    This plateau appears exclusively in the metal- lic phases when the initial magnetic domain diameter D0 exceeds the probe spot diameterD meas, as demon- strated in Fig

    Dependence of the shape of spin relaxation profiles on the area and power of the pump beam A key signature of spin relaxation via domain shrink- ing is the initial plateau in the temporal relaxation pro- files. This plateau appears exclusively in the metal- lic phases when the...

  2. [10]

    This prediction is fully supported in Extended Data Fig

    Dependence of the shape of spin relaxation profiles on the magnetic field As predicted by our theoretical model, the domain- shrinking mechanism becomes inefficient even for ferro- magnetic metals once the energy barrier between the false- and true-vacuum states vanishes at hi...

  3. [11]

    This, in particular, concerns the shape of the temporal spin relaxation profiles for metal- lic and Chern insulating phases

    Reproducibility of spin relaxation profiles on a second spot The key findings of our work were reproduced on mul- tiple spots in device A. This, in particular, concerns the shape of the temporal spin relaxation profiles for metal- lic and Chern insulating phases. Extended Data...

  4. [12]

    4b, we first prepare the device at a given filling factor and orient the hole spins upwards using a positive magnetic fieldB= 0.2 T

    Analysis of spatially resolved zero-field domain writing experiments To visualize the shape of optically written magnetic domains in Fig. 4b, we first prepare the device at a given filling factor and orient the hole spins upwards using a positive magnetic fieldB= 0.2 T. After ...

  5. [13]

    Data for the device B The experimental findings detailed in the main text were reproduced and verified on a second device (de- vice B) with a twist angle of∼4.1 ◦ (see Extended Data Fig. 13a). Notably, due to smaller hBN thick- nesses, the optical resonances in device B exhibi...

  6. [14]

    As argued in Ref

    Theory: Effective model To capture the out-of-equilibrium magnetization dy- namics in twisted MoTe 2 bilayers, we usemodel-Ady- namics [48], describing a non-conserved order-parameter m(r, t): ∂tm(r, t) =−Γ δf[m] δm(r, t)+ξ(r, t),(1) wheretandr= (x, y) denote, respectively, ti...

  7. [15]

    At zero magnetic field, the free energy potential has two equivalent minima at ⟨Sz⟩=±1

    Theory: Coercive field Before discussing the relaxation dynamics, we clarify our definition of the coercive field, which plays a cru- cial role in our discussion of both the experimental re- sults and theoretical simulations. At zero magnetic field, the free energy potential h...

  8. [16]

    We normalize the magnetization such thatm=±1 corresponds to the fully polarized state

    Theory: Out-of-equilibrium dynamics We simulate the spin-relaxation experiment by initial- izing at timet= 0 a magnetic domain of diameterD 0 and magnetizationm=−1 opposite to the background magnetization, which is energetically favored by the mag- netic fieldB >0. We normaliz...

  9. [17]

    4, we perform simulations at zero magnetic fieldB= 0

    Theory: Stability of magnetic domains atB= 0 For our discussion of Fig. 4, we perform simulations at zero magnetic fieldB= 0. Here, the two states with opposite spin orientations have the same energy, and for the metal we expect to observe coarsening dynamics, gov- erned by th...

  10. [18]

    Anderson, F.-R

    E. Anderson, F.-R. Fan, J. Cai, W. Holtzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu.Programming correlated magnetic states with 15 gate-controlled moir´ e geometry.Science381, 325–330 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu.Signatures of Fractional Quantum Anoma- lous Hall States in Twisted MoTe 2.Nature622, 63–68 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan.Thermodynamic Evidence of Fractional Chern Insulator in Moir´ e MoTe2.Nature622, 69–73 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li.Observation of Integer and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted Bilayer MoTe 2.Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu.Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect.Nature 622, 74–79 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    W. Li, E. Redekop, C. Wang Beach, C. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, E. Anderson, H. Park, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-h. Chu, L. Fu, T. Cao, D. Xiao, A. F. Young, and X. Xu.Universal Magnetic Phases in Twisted Bilayer MoTe2.Nano Lett.25, 18044– 18050 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Z. Ji, H. Park, M. E. Barber, C. Hu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, and Z.-X. Shen.Lo- cal probe of bulk and edge states in a fractional Chern insulator.Nature635, 578–583 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Redekop, C

    E. Redekop, C. Zhang, H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, O. Sheekey, T. Arp, G. Babikyan, S. Salters, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. E. Huber, X. Xu, and A. F. Young. Direct magnetic imaging of fractional Chern insulators in twisted MoTe2.Nature635, 584–589 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Y. Jia, T. Song, Z. J. Zheng, G. Cheng, A. J. Uzan, G. Yu, Y. Tang, F. Pollak, Connor J.and Yuan, M. Onyszczak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Lei, N. Yao, L. M. Schoop, N. P. Ong, and S. Wu.Anomalous superconductivity in twisted MoTe 2 nanojunctions.Sci. Adv.11, eadq5712 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    H. Pan, S. Yang, Y. Wang, X. Cai, W. Wang, Y. Zhao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Zhang, Y. Liu, B. Yang, and W. Gao.Optical Signatures of− 1 3 Fractional Quan- tum Anomalous Hall State in TwistedMoTe 2.Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 056601 (2026)

    2026

  20. [28]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, Y. Su, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, L. Lu, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, J. Lin, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Lei, X. Liu, and T. Li.Signatures of unconventional supercon- ductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anoma...

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Pichler, C

    F. Pichler, C. Kuhlenkamp, and M. Knap.False Vacuum Decay in Flat-Band Ferromagnets: Role of Quantum Ge- ometry and Chiral Edge States.Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 156502 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Holtzmann, W

    W. Holtzmann, W. Li, E. Anderson, J. Cai, H. Park, C. Hu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, D. Xiao, et al.Optical control of integer and fractional chern in- sulators.Nature649, 1147–1152 (2026)

    2026

  23. [31]

    Huber, K

    O. Huber, K. Kuhlbrodt, E. Anderson, W. Li, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, X. Xu, A. Imamo˘ glu, and T. Smole´ nski.Optical control over topological chern num- ber in moir´ e materials.Nature649, 1153–1158 (2026)

    2026

  24. [32]

    X. Cai, H. Pan, Y. Wang, A. Rasmita, S. Yang, Y. Zhao, W. Wang, R. Duan, R. He, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Liu, J. Z´ u˜ niga-P´ erez, B. Yang, and W. Gao.Optical switching of a moir´ e Chern ferromagnet.Nature650, 580–584 (2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri.Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe- ordered cuprate.Science331, 189–191 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik.Observation of Floquet-Bloch States on the Surface of a Topological Insulator.Science342, 453–457 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic.Ultrafast Switching to a Stable Hidden Quantum State in an Elec- tronic Crystal.Science344, 177–180 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri.Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene.Nat. Phys.16, 38–41 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Kobayashi, C

    Y. Kobayashi, C. Heide, A. C. Johnson, V. Tiwari, F. Liu, D. A. Reis, T. F. Heinz, and S. Ghimire.Flo- quet engineering of strongly driven excitons in monolayer tungsten disulfide.Nat. Phys.19, 171–176 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Mitra, ´A

    S. Mitra, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Aulich, M. Neuhaus, R. E. F. Silva, V. Pervak, M. F. Kling, and S. Biswas.Light-wave-controlled Haldane model in mono- layer hexagonal boron nitride.Nature628, 752–757 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef.Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials.Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou.Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological ma- terials.Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 33–48 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard.Two- Dimensional Magnetotransport in the Extreme Quantum Limit.Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559–1562 (1982)

    1982

  34. [42]

    R. B. Laughlin.Anomalous quantum Hall effect: an in- compressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged ex- citations.Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  35. [43]

    Hafezi, A

    M. Hafezi, A. S. Sørensen, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin. Fractional quantum hall effect in optical lattices.Phys. Rev. A76, 023613 (2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    Kapit and E

    E. Kapit and E. Mueller.Exact Parent Hamiltonian for the Quantum Hall States in a Lattice.Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 215303 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Sheng, Z.-C

    D. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng.Fractional quantum Hall effect in the absence of Landau levels.Nat. Comm.2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry. Fractional Quantum Hall States at Zero Magnetic Field. Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen.High-Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States.Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236802 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig.Fractional Chern Insu- 16 lator.Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju.Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature626, 759–764 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Y. Wang, J. Choe, E. Anderson, W. Li, J. Ingham, E. A. Arsenault, Y. Li, X. Hu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al.Hidden states and dynamics of fractional fillings in twisted MoTe2 bilayers.Nature641, 1149–1155 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald.Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers.Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Crepel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu.Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers.Nat. Commun.12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    A. P. Reddy, F. Alsallom, Y. Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu.Fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted bilayerMoTe 2 andWSe 2.Phys. Rev. B108, 085117 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao.Fractional Chern Insulator in Twisted BilayerMoTe 2.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Wang, O. Vafek, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault.Fractional Chern insula- tors versus nonmagnetic states in twisted bilayerMoTe 2. Phys. Rev. B109, 045147 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Coleman.Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical the- ory.Phys

    S. Coleman.Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical the- ory.Phys. Rev. D15, 2929–2936 (1977)

    1977

  49. [57]

    C. G. Callan and S. Coleman.Fate of the false vacuum. II. First quantum corrections.Phys. Rev. D16, 1762– 1768 (1977)

    1977

  50. [58]

    Sidler, P

    M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu.Fermi polaron- polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconduc- tors.Nat. Phys.13, 255–261 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Smole´ nski, K

    T. Smole´ nski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, and A. Imamo˘ glu.Spin-Valley Relaxation and Exciton- Induced Depolarization Dynamics of Landau-Quantized Electrons in MoSe 2 Monolayer.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 127402 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Ciorciaro, T

    L. Ciorciaro, T. Smole´ nski, I. Morera, N. Kiper, S. Hies- tand, M. Kroner, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu.Kinetic magnetism in tri- angular moir´ e materials.Nature623, 509–513 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    P. Dey, L. Yang, C. Robert, G. Wang, B. Urbaszek, X. Marie, and S. A. Crooker.Gate-Controlled Spin-Valley Locking of Resident Carriers in WSe 2 Monolayers.Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 137401 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    valley noise

    M. Goryca, N. P. Wilson, P. Dey, X. Xu, and S. A. Crooker.Detection of thermodynamic “valley noise” in monolayer semiconductors: Access to intrinsic valley re- laxation time scales.Sci. Adv.5, eaau4899 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    J. Li, M. Goryca, K. Yumigeta, H. Li, S. Tongay, and S. A. Crooker.Valley relaxation of resident electrons and holes in a monolayer semiconductor: Dependence on car- rier density and the role of substrate-induced disorder. Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 044001 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    M. M. Glazov, M. A. Semina, C. Robert, B. Urbaszek, T. Amand, and X. Marie.Intervalley polaron in atomi- cally thin transition metal dichalcogenides.Phys. Rev. B 100, 041301(R) (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin.Theory of dynamic critical phenomena.Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435–479 (1977)

    1977

  58. [66]

    A. J. Bray.Theory of phase-ordering kinetics.Adv. in Phys.43, 357–459 (1994)

    1994

  59. [67]

    J. M. Park, C. Voinea, Y.-C. Tsui, S. Pu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, N. R. Cooper, M. P. Zaletel, Z. Papi?, and A. Yazdani.Local spectroscopy of anyons bound to charge traps. (2026), arXiv:2606.25024 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2026 arXiv

  60. [68]

    J. Deng, Y. Sun, D. Pimenov, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, E. J. Mueller, and X. Liu.Real-space Imaging of Quantum Hall Quasiparticles. (2026), arXiv:2606.25036 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2026 arXiv

  61. [69]

    W. Li, C. Wang Beach, C. Hu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, J.-H. Chu, A. Imamo˘ glu, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and X. Xu.Signatures of fractional charges via anyon–trions in twisted MoTe 2.Nature651, 48–53 (2026)

    2026

  62. [70]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, et al.Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlat- tices.Nature556, 80–84 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero.Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Na- ture556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  64. [72]

    P. J. Zomer, M. H. D. Guimaraes, J. C. Brant, N. Tombros, and B. J. van Wees.Fast pick up technique for high quality heterostructures of bilayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride.Appl. Phys. Lett.105, 013101 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    Y. Xu, C. Horn, J. Zhu, Y. Tang, L. Ma, L. Li, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, et al.Creation of moir´ e bands in a monolayer semiconductor by spa- tially periodic dielectric screening.Nat. Mat.20, 645–649 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Popert, Y

    A. Popert, Y. Shimazaki, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Imamo˘ glu, and T. Smole´ nski.Optical Sensing of Fractional Quantum Hall Effect in Graphene. Nano Lett.22, 7363–7369 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Smole´ nski, O

    T. Smole´ nski, O. Cotlet, A. Popert, P. Back, Y. Shi- mazaki, P. Kn¨ uppel, N. Dietler, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, M. Kroner, et al.Interaction-induced shubnikov– de haas oscillations in optical conductivity of monolayer MoSe2.Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 097403 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Stˇ reda.Theory of quantised hall conductivity in two dimensions.J

    P. Stˇ reda.Theory of quantised hall conductivity in two dimensions.J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.15, L717–L721 (1982)

    1982

  69. [77]

    Bruno, G

    P. Bruno, G. Bayreuther, P. Beauvillain, C. Chappert, G. Lugert, D. Renard, J. P. Renard, and J. Seiden. Hysteresis properties of ultrathin ferromagnetic films.J. Appl. Phys.68, 5759–5766 (1990)

    1990

  70. [78]

    Qiu and F

    W.-X. Qiu and F. Wu.Topological magnons and domain walls in twisted bilayerMoTe 2.Phys. Rev. B112, 085132 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    J. Chen, Q. Li, X. Wang, and W. Li.Fractional Chern insulator and quantum anomalous Hall crystal in twisted MoTe2.Science Bulletin71, 1034–1042 (2026)

    2026

  72. [80]

    Y.-Q. Wang, C. Liu, and J. E. Moore.Structure of domain walls in chiral spin liquids.PNAS123, e2601093123 (2026). 17 CH 1 CH 2 VOA AOM Photo diode 50:50 50:50 PID 50:50 𝜆/2 To SNSPDs / Spectrometer Power stabilisation Pulse Generation Pulse generator From laser 𝜆/2 Z Y x 𝜆/2 𝜆...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.