Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Entropy-geometry correspondence as effective nonlocal gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A generalized black-hole entropy uniquely determines a nonlocal gravitational operator and a running Newton coupling that reproduces the area law exactly.

desk verdict Useful operator dictionary for entropy-geometry correspondences, but the central thermodynamic 'consistency' is a definitional identity, so the modified-gravity conclusion is not earned. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07046 v1 pith:HJGNA7JJ submitted 2026-08-07 gr-qc

Kimet Jusufi , Ankit Anand This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s04.60.-m04.50.Kd
keywords generalizedentropyentropy-geometrycorrespondencenonlocalgravityrunningNewtoncouplingblackholethermodynamicsstaticsphericalsymmetryfractionalLaplaciancorrections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that, for static spherically symmetric spacetimes, the choice of horizon entropy function $S(r)$ is not merely a thermodynamic label: it uniquely fixes an effective nonlocal gravitational operator, a cumulative mass profile, and a scale-dependent Newton coupling. The central identity is that the generalized entropy is exactly the area law evaluated with the running coupling it generates, $dS = dA/4G_S(r_+)$. This matters because it decides between two physically distinct readings that the field equations alone cannot separate: entropy corrections modify the gravitational sector itself rather than acting as an exotic matter source. The authors work out the construction for seven families of entropy and show that each maps to a distinct class of nonlocal dressing, from inverse-Laplacian infrared operators to fractional Laplacians and exponentially screened kernels.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the cumulative mass fraction $u_S(r)=2\pi r/S'(r)$, which encodes the entropy derivative in a single function. It plays three roles at once: it defines the metric through $f_S(r)=1-2M\,u_S(r)/r$, it gives the running Newton coupling $G_S(r)=G_N u_S(r)$, and it generates the nonlocal operator through the distributional kernel $A^{-2}_S(-\nabla^2)\delta^{(3)}(r)=u_S(0)\delta^{(3)}(r)+u'_S(r)/(4\pi r^2)$. The argument then runs through the chain $S(r)\mapsto u_S(r)\mapsto A^{-2}_S(-\nabla^2)\mapsto \rho_S(r)\mapsto m_S(r)\mapsto f_S(r)$, with the momentum-space form factor obtained by a Hankel transform of the kernel. The thermodynamic identity $dS=dA/4G_S(r_+)$ is the consistency check that selects the modified-gravity reading over the matter-source reading.

What would settle it

Find a static spherical black-hole solution not of the metric ansatz $f(r)=1-2M\,g(r)$ with $g$ independent of $M$, for instance one whose horizon entropy is R\'enyi-like but whose mass function depends nonlinearly on $M$, and check whether the first law $dS=dA/4G_S(r_+)$ still holds with $u_S=2\pi r/S'(r)$; if not, the claimed uniqueness of the entropy-to-operator map fails. Concretely, observing a black hole with $M > M_{\rm ext}=1/(4G_N\sqrt{\pi\lambda})$ that still has a positive-temperature event horizon would contradict the R\'enyi model's prediction that such masses have no horizon.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within the static, spherically symmetric sector, every entropy function $S(r)$ with $S'(r)>0$ determines a geometry through $f_S(r)=1-4\pi M/S'(r)$, equivalently $f_S(r)=1-2M\,u_S(r)/r$ with cumulative mass fraction $u_S(r)=2\pi r/S'(r)$. The paper's discovery is that $u_S(r)$ is simultaneously the cumulative mass fraction, the ratio $G_S(r)/G_N$ of a running Newton coupling, and the source of a distributional kernel $A^{-2}_S(-\nabla^2)\delta^{(3)}(r)=u_S(0)\delta^{(3)}(r)+u'_S(r)/(4\pi r^2)$. Fourier transforming this kernel yields the momentum-space nonlocal form factor $A^{-2}_S(k)$. Because $u_S(r)=2\pi r/S'(r)$, the identity $dS = dA/4G_S(r_+)$ holds verbatim for an arbitrary entropy function. The authors therefore conclude that the generalized entropy is reproduced exactly in the reading where the gravitational coupling runs and the action is modified, while the reading where unmodified Einstein gravity is sourced by a local anisotropic fluid is inconsistent, and is outright excluded by entropy positivity for the R\'enyi and Tsallis-Cirto ($\delta<1$) entropies. The reconstruction is exact only within the static spherical sector; the operator equation $A^2_S(\Box)G_{\mu\nu}=8\pi G_N T_{\mu\nu}$ is not presented as the unrestricted metric variation of a simple nonlocal action, so a fully covariant completion remains open.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes every relevant static spherical spacetime can be written as $f(r)=1-2M\,g(r)$ with $g$ independent of $M$ and $g_{tt}g_{rr}=-1$, which forces the effective source to be an anisotropic fluid with $p_r=-\rho$; if that ansatz is relaxed, the reconstructed nonlocal operator and running coupling need not be unique.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every generalized entropy in the static spherical class acquires a concrete gravitational meaning: it selects a nonlocal form factor and a running coupling, so entropy corrections can be studied geometrically without inventing matter fields.
  • Different entropy proposals predict different asymptotic physics: R\'enyi entropy gives an infrared inverse-Laplacian dressing and a geometry that is not asymptotically flat, Tsallis-Cirto and Barrow entropies give fractional Laplacians, and Kaniadakis, exponential, and LQG-inspired entropies give exponentially screened sources.
  • The identity $dS=dA/4G_S(r_+)$ holds for arbitrary $S$, so any entropy satisfying $S'(r)>0$ and $S''(r)>0$ produces a self-consistent black-hole thermodynamics with positive temperature.
  • Models whose entropy falls below the area law, such as R\'enyi and Tsallis-Cirto entropy with $\delta<1$, cannot be interpreted as Einstein gravity plus ordinary matter; they force the modified-gravity reading on thermodynamic grounds alone.
  • In the modified-gravity reading, negative effective densities are reinterpreted as gravitational polarization rather than energy-condition-violating matter, making the reconstructed sources physically coherent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the correspondence extends to rotating or dynamical spacetimes, horizon entropy could be used as an inverse problem: observations of quasinormal modes, photon spheres, or shadows would constrain the form factor and hence the entropy function, turning black-hole data into a probe of the microscopic entropy choice.
  • The interpretation of $\beta_G(r)=G_N r\,u'_S(r)$ as a radial beta function suggests a geometric analogue of renormalization-group flow driven by entropy rather than by an energy scale; testing whether this flow matches an asymptotically safe completion would require a covariant nonlocal action, which the paper leaves open.
  • A concrete extension would be to compute deflection angles or lensing observables for a specific entropy model and compare with Schwarzschild: deviations governed by $u_S(r)$ are predicted to be strongest for the logarithmic, Barrow, and Kaniadakis models within a few gravitational radii.
  • The pure distributional replacement for the logarithmically corrected entropy, where the delta-function contribution vanishes, predicts a qualitatively different central geometry from models that retain a renormalized point source; distinguishing these classes observationally would select between entropy proposals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an operator/nonlocal-gravity reformulation of the entropy-geometry correspondence for static, spherically symmetric spacetimes. Starting from an entropy function S(r), the metric ansatz f=1-2M g(r) with g_{tt}g_{rr}=-1 and g independent of M leads to g=2π/S'(r), a cumulative mass profile u_S(r)=2πr/S'(r), an effective anisotropic density, a distributional nonlocal kernel A^{-2}_S, and a running Newton coupling G_S(r)=G_N u_S(r). The construction is applied to Bekenstein-Hawking, Rényi, Tsallis-Cirto, Barrow, Kaniadakis, logarithmically corrected, exponentially corrected, and LQG-inspired entropies, with explicit consistency checks between the operator and cumulative-profile routes. The paper's central physical conclusion is that the identity dS=dA/[4G_S(r_+)] shows the generalized entropy is exactly the area law with the reconstructed running coupling, and that this favors a modified-gravitational-sector reading over a matter-dressing reading of the entropy corrections.

Significance. The catalog aspect of the paper is genuinely useful: for each entropy model it gives explicit formulas for the effective density, the momentum-space form factor, the cumulative mass profile, and the resulting metric, and it is unusually candid about the reduced nature of Eq. (III.6) and about the absence of a covariant completion. These are strengths. However, the advertised physical conclusion is not established: the central thermodynamic relation is a definitional identity, and the paper itself concedes that no Wald/Noether-charge computation is performed. The value of the manuscript is therefore as a systematic dictionary and heuristic framework rather than as a proof that entropy corrections belong to the gravitational sector.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.A, Eqs. (IV.3), (IV.22)] The claimed thermodynamic consistency condition is an identity and cannot select the modified-gravity reading. With G_S(r)=G_N u_S(r)=G_N 2πr/S'(r), Eq. (IV.22) gives dA/[4G_S(r)] = (8πr dr)/[4G_N 2πr/S'] = S' dr/G_N, which in the geometrized-unit normalization used in the derivation is simply dS. The equality therefore holds for every differentiable S with S'>0 and carries no information about the action or about the location of the entropy correction. The comparison with A/[4G_S(r_+)] is not a valid alternative, because that expression is not the integral first-law form (IV.23) that defines the running-coupling prescription. The subsequent conclusion that horizon entropy is fixed by the action and hence favors the gravitational-sector reading would require a Wald/Noether-charge computation in a covariant completion; the paper explicitly states that Eq. (III.6) is not the unrestricted metric variation of a covariant nonlocal action (Secs. III and VI). As written, Eq. (IV.22) is compatible with both readings and does not break the degeneracy.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (III.11); Secs. V.C and V.D] The distributional decomposition of the kernel is ill-defined for the Barrow and Tsallis-Cirto models, as the paper itself acknowledges by discarding divergent endpoint contributions. For Barrow, u_B(r) ∝ r^{-Δ} diverges as r→0, so u_B(0) is not finite and Eq. (V.31) evaluates an integral ∫_0^r x^{-1-Δ} dx that does not exist without a regulator; for Tsallis-Cirto with δ>1 the same problem arises. The claimed one-to-one correspondence between entropy and nonlocal operator therefore holds only after an implicit analytic-continuation or regularization prescription is chosen, and different prescriptions would give different u_S(0) and different kernels. This should be presented as a regularization assumption, not as an exact distributional reconstruction.
  3. [Secs. II and III, Eqs. (II.1)-(II.3) and (III.15)] The uniqueness of the reconstructed operator is relative to the ansatz g_{tt}g_{rr}=-1 and g independent of M. The paper states these assumptions, but still refers to a one-to-one correspondence between entropy derivative, source, and nonlocal operator. Nothing in the derivation shows that a general static spherical geometry satisfying the first law must have this form; if the metric ansatz were relaxed, the same S(r) could be realized by different f(r) and hence different A^{-2}_S. The claims of uniqueness should be explicitly restricted to the stated ansatz, or the ansatz should be derived from an independent principle.
  4. [Sec. IV.A, Eq. (IV.24)] The exclusion of the Einstein-matter reading for the Rényi and Tsallis-Cirto (δ<1) entropies relies on the additional assumption that S_matter≥0. This is not derived from the reconstruction. It is reasonable for a local minimally coupled anisotropic fluid, but the paper explicitly leaves open a covariantly nonlocal matter sector for which the matter action and entropy functional are not specified; for such a sector one cannot assert S_matter≥0. The degeneracy-breaking conclusion is therefore conditional on a restricted class of matter models and does not follow from Eqs. (IV.22)-(IV.24) alone.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Eq. (IV.22)] The notation 'dd S' and 'dd A' should be the ordinary differentials dS and dA.
  2. [Sec. V.C, after Eq. (V.24)] The sentence introducing the Tsallis-Cirto model should clarify that the radial convexity condition (II.7) is used later as the black-hole criterion, since the text initially appears to state that δ=1 is the only case considered.
  3. [Sec. V.F, footnote 1] The Meijer G-function expression for A^{-2}_log(k) is presented with an equals sign followed by an unexplained overall factor and a missing closing bracket; it should be rechecked and displayed with all prefactors defined.
  4. [References] References [28] and [29] list the same paper twice in different journal formats; one should be removed or merged.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Eq. (IV.22) is a definitional identity: with GS(r)=GN uS(r)=GN 2πr/S'(r), dA/4GS reduces to dS for any entropy, so the 'thermodynamic consistency' and the gravitational-sector conclusion do not follow from it.

  1. self definitional [Sec. IV, Eqs. (II.10), (IV.3)-(IV.4), (IV.22)-(IV.23); abstract and Sec. VI]
    "Using uS = 2πr/S′ and A= 4πr2, dA 4GS(r+) = 8πr+ dr+ 4GN uS(r+) = S′(r+) GN dr+ = dS(r+), (IV.22), that is, in the units of Eq. (IV.4), S(r+) = Z r+ dA 4GS(r) ,(IV.23), an identity valid for an arbitrary entropy function."

    GS is introduced in Eq. (IV.3) as GN uS(r), and uS is introduced in Eq. (II.10) as 2πr/S'(r). Substituting these definitions into dA/(4GS) gives (8πr dr)/(4GN·2πr/S') = S' dr/GN = dS identically, with no use of field equations or a specific entropy model. The paper itself calls Eq. (IV.23) 'an identity valid for an arbitrary entropy function.' Therefore Eq. (IV.22) cannot 'ensure thermodynamic consistency' and cannot select the gravitational-sector reading over the matter-sector reading; it is the inverse of the definition of GS.

  2. self definitional [Sec. III, Eqs. (III.11)-(III.15); Sec. V, Eqs. (V.13)-(V.14)]
    "We therefore define the entropy form factor by A−2 S (−∇2)δ(3)(r) =u S(0)δ(3)(r) + u′ S(r) 4πr2 (III.11)... Within the static spherical prescription (I.2), every entropy S(r) determines a distributional operator kernel through Eq. (III.11). Einstein gravity sourced by eTµν =A −2 S (−∇2)Tµν (III.13) then reproduces exactly the entropy-generated metric."

    The operator A^{-2}_S is defined in Eq. (III.11) directly in terms of uS(0) and u'_S(r), with uS already fixed by S through Eq. (II.10). The claim that this operator 'reproduces exactly the entropy-generated metric' is therefore a restatement of the defining decomposition. The per-model consistency checks in Sec. V (e.g., Eq. (V.14) integrates Eq. (V.13) back to uS(r)) verify the same definition rather than an independent correspondence; the map S → uS → A^{-2}_S is injective by construction.

full rationale

The paper is honest about several limitations: Sec. II states the ansatz (II.1)/(II.3) and the M-independence of g as assumptions, and Secs. III and IV A explicitly warn that Eq. (III.6) is not the metric variation of a covariant nonlocal action and that no Noether-charge computation has been performed. In Sec. IV A the paper states: 'What is not established here is a Noether-charge computation in a fully covariant nonlocal theory... Eq. (IV.22) should be read as strong evidence that such a computation would return the input entropy, not as a substitute for it.' These are genuine caveats and reduce the force of the action-based conclusion, though they are not themselves circularity. The self-citations to [13,19] are also not load-bearing in a circularity sense: the metric relation f=1-4πM/S' is re-derived in Sec. II from the stated ansatz and first law, rather than imported as an unexamined uniqueness theorem. What is circular is the central consistency claim. Eq. (IV.3) defines GS = GN uS with uS = 2πr/S', so Eq. (IV.22) is an algebraic identity; the paper's own words call it 'an identity valid for an arbitrary entropy function.' Similarly, the nonlocal operator is defined from uS and then used to reproduce uS. The reconstructed metrics, source densities, form factors, and the positivity-based exclusion of the matter-sector reading for Rényi and Tsallis-Cirto entropies are model-specific content that does not reduce to the definitions. But the headline result advertised in the abstract and conclusion — that the generalized entropy 'exactly reproduces the area law with the reconstructed running Newton coupling' — is forced by construction. I therefore assign 8 rather than 10 because substantial independent reconstruction work remains, but the main thermodynamic 'prediction' is a definitional identity.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reconstruction is built from the input entropy S(r), the static spherical ansatz, and deformation parameters inherited from entropy models. No new fundamental entities are introduced; the nonlocal operator, running coupling, and dressing clouds are reinterpretations of the reconstructed metric. The model parameters are not fitted in this paper, but they determine all model-specific predictions.

free parameters (8)
  • λ (Rényi)
    Deformation parameter in SR = λ^{-1} ln(1 + λx); inherited from nonextensive statistics, not fitted here.
  • δ (Tsallis-Cirto)
    Exponent in STC = x^δ; controls the order of the reconstructed fractional Laplacian.
  • Δ (Barrow)
    Fractal exponent in SB = x^{1+Δ/2}; input from Barrow's rough-horizon model.
  • κ (Kaniadakis)
    Deformation parameter in SK = sinh(κx)/κ; inherited from κ-statistics.
  • α (logarithmic correction)
    Strength of the logarithmic term in Slog = x + α ln x; input from quantum-gravity entropy corrections.
  • η (exponential correction)
    Strength of the exponential term in Sexp = x + η e^{-x}; restricted to 0 < η < 1.
  • q (LQG nonextensive parameter)
    Nonextensive parameter in the LQG-inspired entropy; controls the Gaussian dressing profile.
  • Λ(γ0)
    LQG parameter involving the Barbero-Immirzi parameter; treated as an input from the LQG literature.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Static spherical metric ansatz with gtt grr = -1 and g independent of M (II.1)-(II.3)
    Restricts the construction to sources with pr = -ρ and linear response; the paper states this structure is input, not derived.
  • domain assumption First-law condition S'(r) = 4πM is extended to all r in RS (II.4)-(II.5)
    Assumes every radius is the horizon of some member of the M-family; carried over from Ref. [13].
  • ad hoc to paper Distributional decomposition (III.11) with finite uS(0)
    Not valid for Barrow (uB ~ r^{-Δ}) or Tsallis-Cirto with δ > 1, where u diverges at the origin; the paper uses analytic continuation and discards endpoint singularities.
  • domain assumption Reduced operator equation A²(□)G = 8πGN T is the symmetry-reduced field equation (III.6)
    The authors state it is not the unrestricted metric variation of a nonlocal action; action-level entropy statements depend on this caveat.
  • ad hoc to paper Matter entropy is nonnegative in Eq. (IV.24)
    Used to exclude the matter-sector reading for Rényi and Tsallis-Cirto δ < 1; not proven for nonlocal matter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entropy-geometry correspondence as effective nonlocal gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HJGNA7JJ

@misc{pith2026260807046,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entropy-geometry correspondence as effective nonlocal gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HJGNA7JJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07046}
}
abstract

We develop an operator formulation of the entropy-geometry correspondence for static, spherically symmetric gravity. Starting from a generalized entropy, we reconstruct an effective nonlocal form factor, its coordinate-space source, the associated cumulative mass profile, and the resulting spacetime geometry. The construction is worked out for the Bekenstein-Hawking, R\'enyi, Tsallis-Cirto, Barrow, Kaniadakis entropies, logarithmically/exponentially corrected entropy and LQG inspired entropy. The operator representation provides a direct relation between generalized entropy, nonlocal gravitational dressing, and a scale-dependent effective mass or Newton coupling. We analyze the reconstructed sources and their infrared and ultraviolet behavior, discuss their physical consistency, and identify the limits in which the standard Schwarzschild description is recovered. We show that the generalized entropy exactly reproduces the area law with the reconstructed running Newton coupling, $\dd S=\dd A/4G_S(r_+)$, ensuring thermodynamic consistency. Since horizon entropy is determined by the action, this favors entropy corrections in the gravitational sector. We also derive the conditions for the reconstructed horizon to be an event horizon with positive temperature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,”Physical Review D7(1973) 2333–2346

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    Particle creation by black holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,” Communications in Mathematical Physics43(1975) 199–220

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    The four laws of black hole mechanics,

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The four laws of black hole mechanics,”Communications in Mathematical Physics31(1973) 161–170

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    Thermodynamics of spacetime: The einstein equation of state,

    T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of spacetime: The einstein equation of state,”Physical Review Letters75 (1995) 1260–1263,arXiv:gr-qc/9504004

    arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: New insights,

    T. Padmanabhan, “Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: New insights,”Reports on Progress in Physics73(2010) 046901,arXiv:0911.5004 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    On the origin of gravity and the laws of newton,

    E. Verlinde, “On the origin of gravity and the laws of newton,”Journal of High Energy Physics2011no. 4, (2011) 29,arXiv:1001.0785 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Logarithmic correction to the bekenstein-hawking entropy,

    R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, “Logarithmic correction to the bekenstein-hawking entropy,”Physical Review Letters84(2000) 5255–5257,arXiv:gr-qc/0002040

    arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    General logarithmic corrections to black-hole entropy,

    S. Das, P. Majumdar, and R. K. Bhaduri, “General logarithmic corrections to black-hole entropy,”Classical and Quantum Gravity19(2002) 2355–2368, arXiv:hep-th/0111001

    arXiv 2002

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Possible generalization of boltzmann-gibbs statistics,

    C. Tsallis, “Possible generalization of boltzmann-gibbs statistics,”Journal of Statistical Physics52(1988) 479–487

    1988

  2. [10]

    On measures of entropy and information,

    A. R´ enyi, “On measures of entropy and information,” Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability1(1961) 547–561

    1961

  3. [11]

    The area of a rough black hole,

    J. D. Barrow, “The area of a rough black hole,”Physics Letters B808(2020) 135643,arXiv:2004.09444 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity,

    G. Kaniadakis, “Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity,”Physical Review E66(2002) 056125

    2002

  5. [13]

    Effective matter sectors from modified entropies,

    A. Anand, S. Devdutt, K. Jusufi, and E. N. Saridakis, “Effective matter sectors from modified entropies,”Eur. Phys. J. C86no. 5, (2026) 534,arXiv:2511.04613 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Black holes in an ultraviolet complete quantum gravity,

    L. Modesto, J. W. Moffat, and P. Nicolini, “Black holes in an ultraviolet complete quantum gravity,”Physics Letters B695(2011) 397–400,arXiv:1010.0680 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Nonlocal and generalized uncertainty principle black holes,

    P. Nicolini, “Nonlocal and generalized uncertainty principle black holes,”arXiv:1202.2102 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  8. [17]

    Towards singularity- and ghost-free theories of gravity,

    T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto, and A. Mazumdar, “Towards singularity- and ghost-free theories of gravity,” Physical Review Letters108(2012) 031101, arXiv:1110.5249 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Super-renormalizable quantum gravity,

    L. Modesto, “Super-renormalizable quantum gravity,” Physical Review D86(2012) 044005,arXiv:1107.2403 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Topological and optical signatures of modified black-hole entropies,

    A. Anand, K. Jusufi, S. Basilakos, and E. N. Saridakis, “Topological and optical signatures of modified black-hole entropies,”Eur. Phys. J. C86no. 2, (2026) 126, 18 arXiv:2512.13769 [gr-qc]

    2026

  11. [20]

    Ultraviolet Complete Quantum Gravity,

    J. W. Moffat, “Ultraviolet Complete Quantum Gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus126(2011) 43,arXiv:1008.2482 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity,

    M. Reuter, “Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 971–985, arXiv:hep-th/9605030

    1998 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, vol

    R. Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, vol. 3 of100 Years of General Relativity. World Scientific, 2017

    2017

  14. [23]

    An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter,

    A. Eichhorn, “An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter,”Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2019) 47,arXiv:1810.07615 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [24]

    On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,

    K. Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,”Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1916(1916) 189–196,arXiv:physics/9905030

    1916 arXiv

  16. [26]

    A q-parameter bound for particle spectra based on black hole thermodynamics with r´ enyi entropy,

    T. S. Bir´ o and V. G. Czinner, “A q-parameter bound for particle spectra based on black hole thermodynamics with r´ enyi entropy,”Phys. Lett. B726(2013) 861–865, arXiv:1309.4261 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [27]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 3 ed., 1999

    1999

  18. [28]

    Black hole thermodynamical entropy,

    L. J. L. Cirto and C. Tsallis, “Black hole thermodynamical entropy,”The European Physical Journal C73(2013) 2487

    2013

  19. [29]

    Black hole thermodynamical entropy,

    C. Tsallis and L. J. L. Cirto, “Black hole thermodynamical entropy,”The European Physical Journal C73(2013) 2487

    2013

  20. [30]

    Barrow holographic dark energy,

    E. N. Saridakis, “Barrow holographic dark energy,” Physical Review D102no. 12, (2020) 123525

    2020

  21. [31]

    Non-linear kinetics underlying generalized statistics,

    G. Kaniadakis, “Non-linear kinetics underlying generalized statistics,”Physica A296(2001) 405–425

    2001

  22. [32]

    Tsallis and kaniadakis statistics from the viewpoint of entropic gravity formalism,

    A. C. R. M. E. M. C. Abreu, J. Ananias Neto and W. Oliveira, “Tsallis and kaniadakis statistics from the viewpoint of entropic gravity formalism,”Physica A461 (2016) 739–744

    2016

  23. [33]

    Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the cardy formula,

    S. Carlip, “Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the cardy formula,”Classical and Quantum Gravity 17(2000) 4175–4186

    2000

  24. [34]

    Logarithmic corrections to schwarzschild and other non-extremal black hole entropy in different dimensions,

    A. Sen, “Logarithmic corrections to schwarzschild and other non-extremal black hole entropy in different dimensions,”Journal of High Energy Physics2013no. 4, (2013) 156

    2013

  25. [35]

    A Brief commentary on black hole entropy,

    A. J. M. Medved, “A Brief commentary on black hole entropy,”arXiv:gr-qc/0410086

    arXiv

  26. [36]

    Modified gravity and its reconstruction from the universe expansion history,

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Modified gravity and its reconstruction from the universe expansion history,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser.66(2007) 012005, arXiv:hep-th/0611071

    2007 arXiv

  27. [37]

    Exponential Corrections to Black Hole Entropy,

    A. Chatterjee and A. Ghosh, “Exponential Corrections to Black Hole Entropy,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 4, (2020) 041302,arXiv:2007.15401 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [38]

    New Entropies, Black Holes, and Holographic Dark Energy,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. Faraoni, “New Entropies, Black Holes, and Holographic Dark Energy,” Astrophysics65no. 4, (2022) 534–551, arXiv:2208.10235 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [39]

    R´ enyi Entropy and the Thermodynamic Stability of Black Holes,

    V. G. Czinner and H. Iguchi, “R´ enyi Entropy and the Thermodynamic Stability of Black Holes,”Phys. Lett. B 752(2016) 306–310,arXiv:1511.06963 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.