Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Topological defects in reflection positive topological field theories

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that topological defects in 2-dimensional reflection defect TQFTs assemble into an $O(2)$-dagger bicategory, and that reflection positivity upgrades this to a near-3-Hilbert space.

desk verdict A genuinely new theorem—reflection defect TQFTs yield O(2)-dagger bicategories—and the geometric premise survives scrutiny, but two proofs are sketched and one definition leans on an in-preparation paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07217 v1 pith:OMOQOUDC submitted 2026-08-07 math-ph math.ATmath.CTmath.MPmath.QA

Lukas Müller This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.ATmath.CTmath.MPmath.QA MSC 81T4518N10
keywords topologicaldefectsreflectionpositivityTQFTbicategoriesdaggercategories3-Hilbertspacespivotalstructuregeneralizedsymmetries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what extra structure topological defects acquire when the underlying topological field theory is reflection positive, i.e. unitary. The author defines a reflection defect TQFT as a symmetric monoidal functor from a defect bordism category to complex vector spaces that intertwines total orientation reversal with complex conjugation, and proves that in two dimensions the defect bicategory $\mathcal{T}_{\mathcal{Z}}$ built from such a theory carries a natural $O(2)$-dagger bicategory structure: a complex anti-linear dagger reversing the direction of 2-morphisms, together with a dual functor reversing defect-line orientations, compatible with each other and yielding a unitary pivotal structure. When the theory is reflection positive, the hom-spaces become Hilbert spaces and the partition function on spheres defines a spherical weight, so the defect bicategory is a 3-Hilbert space up to finiteness and completeness conditions. The interest is that this puts unitarity and higher-categorical symmetry data of defects on the same footing, recovering unitary fusion categories as the single-label case.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $O(2)$-dagger bicategory: a $\mathbb{C}$-linear bicategory with adjoints equipped with an anti-linear involutive dagger functor that is the identity on objects and 1-morphisms, together with a dual functor $(-)^L$ that commutes with the dagger and has unitary coherence isomorphisms. In the geometric setting, $\dagger$ is extracted from the reflection of the decorated circles $E_{X,Y}$ that define the 2-morphism spaces, and $(-)^L$ from the $\pi$-rotation of defect lines, with rainbow disks providing the adjunction data. The mechanism that makes the structure strict is the full-twist annulus identity: transporting the defect lines of a decorated circle through a full $2\pi$ rotation yields a bordism equal to the identity cylinder because bordisms are taken up to diffeomorphism relative to the boundary; this equality makes left and right mates agree and trivializes the canonical pivotal structure.

What would settle it

Find a reflection-positive 2D defect TQFT in which the full-twist annulus is not diffeomorphic, relative to the boundary, to the identity cylinder, or exhibit a 2-endomorphism $f$ for which the sphere partition function assigns different values to the right and left traces. Either would break the spherical-weight identity $\psi_\alpha(\mathrm{tr}_R(f))=\psi_\beta(\mathrm{tr}_L(f))$ and falsify the central conclusion. A concrete place to look is a bordism category whose defect labels carry extra tangential data preventing the Dehn twist from being the identity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem 4.2, is that the bicategory of topological defects in a 2-dimensional reflection defect TQFT is an $O(2)$-dagger bicategory. The $O(2)$-structure is generated by the dagger, obtained by reflecting the decorated circles that compute 2-morphism spaces, and the dual functor, obtained by rotating defect lines by $\pi$; the compatibility of the two is exactly the planar statement that a reflection conjugates a rotation to its inverse. The dagger is complex anti-linear, involutive, and the identity on objects and 1-morphisms; every 1-morphism has a two-sided adjoint given by orientation reversal of the defect lines, with adjunction data supplied by rainbow disks whose Zorro moves are isotopies. Strict pivotality—the agreement of left and right mates on the nose—follows because the full-twist annulus, obtained by rotating the defect lines of a decorated circle through $2\pi$, equals the identity cylinder in the bordism category, whose morphisms are taken up to diffeomorphism relative to the boundary. Under reflection positivity, the dagger is anti-unitary for the inner products on the hom-spaces, and the maps $\psi_\alpha(f)=b_{S^1_\alpha}(\mathrm{id},f)$ form a spherical weight; granting direct sums and finiteness conditions, the paper concludes that $\mathcal{T}_{\mathcal{Z}}$ is a 3-Hilbert space.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on declaring the full-twist annulus—the surface obtained by rotating the defect lines of a decorated circle through $2\pi$—to be the same bordism as the untwisted identity cylinder, because bordisms are equated up to diffeomorphism relative to the boundary. If the correct equivalence were only isotopy, or if defect labels carried data that broke diffeomorphism invariance, this equality would fail, and the agreement of left and right rotations on which the $O(2)$-structure depends would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any 2D reflection defect TQFT, the defect bicategory has a canonical unitary pivotal structure and every 1-morphism has a two-sided adjoint, making the defect data a unitary bi-involutive structure rather than merely a pivotal one.
  • If the theory is reflection positive, every 2-morphism space is a Hilbert space and the dagger is anti-unitary, so the operator–state correspondence produces unitary Hilbert-space data from decorated circles.
  • The sphere partition function defines a spherical weight, and after adding direct sums and finiteness conditions the defect bicategory is a 3-Hilbert space, matching expectations for categorical symmetries.
  • For a theory with a single bulk label, the one-object case is a unitary fusion category with a unitary dual functor, recovering the categorical structure of unitary categorical symmetries in two dimensions.
  • In dimension one the same reflection construction yields a dagger category, giving a minimal check of the higher-dimensional claim.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the $O(2)$-structure is generated by a reflection and a rotation, the construction suggests a template for higher-dimensional unitary defect categories: one should look for an analogous full-twist identity at the relevant codimension, and where it fails the pivotal part of the structure would become only coherent rather than strict.
  • The spherical weight is a TQFT-computable invariant of point defects; in lattice or tensor-network models of 2D topological order, one could numerically test reflection positivity of a candidate defect theory by checking positivity of the pairings $b_E$ on every decorated circle.
  • The paper works with oriented theories and a $\mathbb{C}$-anti-linear dagger; extending the argument to unoriented theories would presumably require a $\mathbb{C}$-linear dagger and possibly richer defect labels, providing a concrete way to probe how far the framework reaches.
  • Since reflection positivity is packaged as a dagger functor to Hilbert spaces, any construction of defect TQFTs that produces a dagger structure automatically satisfies the positivity conditions, suggesting a route to new examples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper defines reflection defect TQFTs as symmetric monoidal functors from the defect bordism category of [CRS18] to Vect_C equipped with a reflection equivariance datum, and reflection positivity as positive-definiteness of the induced hermitian pairings. For two-dimensional theories it extracts the defect bicategory T_Z of [DKR11, Car16] and proves (Theorem 4.2) that T_Z carries an O(2)-dagger bicategory structure: the dagger is induced by total orientation reversal together with the reflection equivariance, and the dual functor is orientation reversal of defect lines, with the two compatible through pivotality. Under reflection positivity, the paper then constructs a spherical weight on T_Z (Proposition 5.2), relating the structure to the 3-Hilbert spaces of [CHFHS24] up to completeness and finiteness conditions. The main geometric mechanism is the standard rigidity of defect bordisms up to decoration-preserving diffeomorphism relative to the boundary.

Significance. If the stated structure theorems are correct, the paper gives a concrete and natural higher-categorical package for unitarity in two-dimensional defect TQFTs, combining the pivotal structure from [DKR11] with a reflection-induced dagger into an O(2)-action. The construction is parameter-free: the dagger and the dual functor are determined by the reflection equivariance and the geometry of decorated circles and pants, not by auxiliary choices. The paper also gives an explicit definition of O(2)-dagger bicategories, which is likely to be useful independently. I note that the potential objection that the full-twist annulus is not the identity cylinder is resolved by the quotient built into the defect bordism category: the Dehn twist is a decoration-preserving diffeomorphism relative to the boundary, so the equality used in the pivotality discussion is justified. The main weaknesses are that several load-bearing verification steps are only sketched or asserted, and one proof line contains a non sequitur.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, Lemma 4.7(2)] The compatibility of the dagger with horizontal composition is not proved: the text says 'Part (2) is identical' and gives no computation. This is load-bearing because without it † is not known to be a functor, and the later proof of the O(2)-dagger structure uses functoriality of † throughout. Please give an explicit description of the horizontal composition pants, its image under the reflection u_{X,Y}, and verify that the two incoming circles are not exchanged, including the sign bookkeeping for the marked points.
  2. [§4.3, Proposition 4.9] The sentence 'it is strict because X^{LL}=X on the nose—orientation reversal of the defect lines being an involution—so δ=id' is a non sequitur: equality of 1-morphisms does not imply that the canonical comparison 2-morphism δ_X is the identity, since a 1-morphism can have nontrivial 2-automorphisms. Either prove δ=id using the geometric fact that the full-twist annulus is the identity cylinder, or state Proposition 4.9 without the strictness/δ=id assertion.
  3. [§5, Proposition 5.2] The proof of the spherical weight is only sketched. The equality ψ_α(tr_R(f)) = ψ_β(tr_L(f)) is justified by 'a geometric argument sketched in Figure 10', and the positivity identity b_{S^1_α}(id, φ†φ) = b(φ,φ) is asserted in one sentence without defining the relevant gluings precisely. Since this proposition is the main new result of Section 5, please give a detailed bordism-level argument, including the explicit forms of the cups, traces, and the isotopy underlying the trace equality.
  4. [§3, Definitions 3.4 and 3.5] The type of the equivariance datum is written as ρ: Z∘R ⇒ Z, which as a linear natural isomorphism would make the map φ† in Definition 4.5 linear rather than anti-linear. The intended anti-linearity, which is also needed for b_E to be hermitian, should be made explicit by writing ρ_E: Z(R(E)) → \overline{Z(E)} and adjusting the subsequent formulas accordingly. As written, the displayed type of ρ is inconsistent with the repeated statement that † is anti-linear.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2, Definition 2.1] The definition is self-contained, but it cites [MS27] as providing a 'coherent formulation'; since [MS27] is in preparation, please mark this dependence clearly in the text.
  2. [§1, AI-use statement] The 'Statement on AI use' and the following 'Comments by the author' paragraphs are unusual in a research article; consider moving this material to an acknowledgment or to a separate editorial note.
  3. [Abstract and §5] The abstract says the defect bicategory agrees with a 3-Hilbert space up to finiteness and completeness conditions, but Section 5 proves only existence of a spherical weight and states the remaining conditions as expected; please soften the abstract to match the proven content.
  4. [§4.2] The identification Hom(X,Y) = Hom(1_β, Y⊗X^L) is used without explanation; adding a one-sentence justification would improve readability.
  5. [Figure 10] The caption of Figure 10 describes the trace equality but the figure is small and the isotopy is not evident; a written bordism equation or a larger, more detailed figure would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the O(2)-dagger structure is derived from explicit stratified geometry and independent prior work, with no fitted parameters or self-referential load-bearing argument.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 4.2) is that the defect bicategory T_Z of a 2-dimensional reflection defect TQFT carries an O(2)-dagger structure. The two ingredients are constructed directly: the dagger is defined in Definition 4.5 as the reflection-equivariance isomorphism rho composed with explicit diffeomorphisms u_{X,Y} of decorated circles, and the dual functor (-)^L is the orientation reversal of defect lines together with the rainbow adjunction data of [Car16]. The pivotal compatibility (Proposition 4.9) is imported from the independent theorem of [DKR11] and from the bordism-category convention that morphisms are taken up to diffeomorphism relative to the boundary; no step of the proof defines its conclusion into its hypotheses. Reflection positivity enters only after Theorem 4.2, through Definition 3.5 and the external equivalence [Ste23, Thm. 2.3.41], and the spherical weight of Proposition 5.2 is constructed from the positive pairing b_E, with the trace equality justified geometrically. The self-references ([Mue25], [MS23], [MS27]) are contextual: Definition 2.1 is spelled out explicitly, [MS27] is only mentioned as a future coherent formulation, and [MS23] is cited for a classification result. The in-preparation citation [MS27] does not carry any load in the proof. No fitted-input-as-prediction, self-definitional, or renaming pattern occurs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a pure structural mathematics result: it introduces no fitted parameters, no numerical constants tuned to data, and no new physical entities. Everything rests on categorical geometry and on cited prior frameworks: the defect bordism category up to diffeomorphism, the duality condition (12) ensuring a well-defined reflection functor, the D_0-completion reducing point defects to states, and the operator-state correspondence that makes state spaces compute junction labels. The axioms below are the domain assumptions used in the proofs.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Bordisms are considered up to diffeomorphism relative to the boundary, not up to isotopy.
    Used in Section 4.3 pivotality argument to identify the full-twist annulus with the identity cylinder, which requires diffeomorphism invariance rather than isotopy invariance.
  • domain assumption Defect data D satisfies the duality condition f_j(φ,−) = f_j(φ,+)^{rev} (eq. 12), so the total orientation reversal functor R is well-defined.
    Section 3.1, Definition 3.1; this is what makes the reflection action on the defect bordism category well-defined for arbitrary defect data.
  • domain assumption Setting D_0 = ∅ (no interior 0-strata) is no loss of generality because point defect labels are identified with states computed by the TQFT.
    Section 3 and Section 4.2, following [CRS18, §2.4]; this is how the 2-morphism spaces Hom(X,Y) are defined as state spaces of decorated circles.
  • domain assumption The equivalence between reflection-positive TQFTs and symmetric monoidal dagger functors to Hilb holds (Ste23, Thm. 2.3.41).
    Section 5 uses this theorem to pass from positive-definite pairings to Hilbert space structures on 2-morphism spaces.
  • domain assumption Pivotality of the defect bicategory T_Z holds as proven in [DKR11], and the geometric identification of the full-twist annulus with the identity cylinder is valid in the defect bordism category.
    Proposition 4.9 and the proof of Theorem 4.2 rest on this; it is a theorem of [DKR11] plus a geometric fact about the bordism category.
  • domain assumption The operator-state correspondence maps the state space Z(E_{X,Y}) to the set of junction label data, giving the 2-morphisms of T_Z.
    Section 4.2, eq. (20); this is the link between the non-extended TQFT and the higher categorical data of defects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological defects in reflection positive topological field theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OMOQOUDC

@misc{pith2026260807217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological defects in reflection positive topological field theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OMOQOUDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07217}
}
abstract

Topological defects in quantum field theories are believed to assemble into higher categories with extra structure. This has been made precise for defects in $2$- and $3$-dimensional oriented topological quantum field theories by Davydov, Kong, and Runkel and by Carqueville, Meusburger, and Schaumann, respectively. In this paper we study the extra structure present on these categories when the topological field theory is additionally reflection positive. We define reflection defect TQFTs as symmetric monoidal functors out of a defect bordism category that intertwine orientation reversal with complex conjugation; they are reflection positive if they satisfy an additional positivity condition. Our main result is that in two dimensions the bicategory of defects $\mathcal{T}_\mathcal{Z}$ associated to a reflection defect TQFT carries the natural structure of an $O(2)$-dagger bicategory, a structure we define explicitly. If the theory is reflection positive, $\mathcal{T}_\mathcal{Z}$ can be equipped with additional structure closely related to the definition of a 3-Hilbert space (the two agree up to some finiteness and completeness conditions).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07217 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Coorientation convention for interior 1-strata. The 1-stratum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Germ presentation of a marked point on an object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic sketch of the evaluation bent cylinder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evaluation bent interval h: S 0 β,α ⊔S 0 α,β → ∅ in dimension one: the elementary cup pairing Hom(β, α) ⊗ Hom(α, β) → C, with the two arcs coloured by the bulk labels α and β. It is the one-dimensional analogue of the bent cylinder of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The defect circle EX,Y for X, Y : α → β, with Hom(X, Y ) = Z(EX,Y ): the points of Y on the upper half, those of X with reversed signs on the lower half. of 2-morphisms uses a second, differently decorated pair of pants. Associativity and unitality follow from isotopy …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The isomorphism uX,Y of Lemma 4.4 as the reflection of the defect circle across the horizontal axis (dashed). Total orientation reversal followed by z 7→ z¯ fixes the basepoint −1 and the intervals β (left), α (right), exchanges the upper and lower halves, and flips th…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The dagger of a 2-morphism given by a decorated disk: total orientation reversal, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The composition pants PX,Y,Z : EY,Z ⊔ EX,Y → EX,Z (left), in which the Y -strands of the two incoming circles are joined while the X- and Z-strands run out to EX,Z. The reflection z 7→ z¯ of Remark 4.3 sends each boundary circle to its dual (EX,Y 7→ EY,X, EY,Z 7→ EZ,Y …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The half-twist annulus computing the mates (left), transporting the defect lines of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The bordisms representing the right trace [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. F. Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories, Publ.\ Math.\ Inst.\ Hautes \'Etudes Sci.\ 68 (1988) 175--186

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Bartsch, Unitary categorical symmetries, J.\ Phys.\ A 59 (2026) 205204, arXiv:2502.04440

    T. Bartsch, Unitary categorical symmetries, J.\ Phys.\ A 59 (2026) 205204, arXiv:2502.04440

    arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys.\ Rept.\ 1051 (2024) 1--87, arXiv:2307.07547

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, Higher representations for extended operators, arXiv:2304.03789

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, Representation theory for categorical symmetries, arXiv:2305.17165

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    J. C. Baez and J. Dolan, Higher-dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory, J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 36 (1995) 6073--6105, arXiv:q-alg/9503002

    arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Sch\"afer-Nameki, Generalized charges, part I: Invertible symmetries and higher representations, SciPost Phys.\ 16 (2024) 093, arXiv:2304.02660

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Sch\"afer-Nameki, Generalized charges, part II: Non-invertible symmetries and the Symmetry TFT, SciPost Phys.\ 19 (2025) 098, arXiv:2305.17159

    arXiv 2025

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, J.\ High Energy Phys.\ 03 (2018) 189, arXiv:1704.02330

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Carqueville, Lecture notes on 2-dimensional defect TQFT, Banach Center Publications 114 (2018) 49--84, arXiv:1607.05747

    N. Carqueville, Lecture notes on 2-dimensional defect TQFT, Banach Center Publications 114 (2018) 49--84, arXiv:1607.05747

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Cordova, T

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, Snowmass white paper: Generalized symmetries in quantum field theory and beyond, arXiv:2205.09545

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Q. Chen, B. Hungar, G. Ferrer, D. Penneys, and S. Sanford, Manifestly unitary higher Hilbert spaces, arXiv:2410.05120

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Carqueville and T

    N. Carqueville and T. L\"uders, Orbifolds, higher dagger structures, and idempotents, Theory Appl.\ Categ.\ 45 (2026) 863--923, arXiv:2504.17764

    2026 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Carqueville, C

    N. Carqueville, C. Meusburger, and G. Schaumann, 3-dimensional defect TQFTs and their tricategories, Adv.\ Math.\ 364 (2020) 107024, arXiv:1603.01171

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Carqueville, I

    N. Carqueville, I. Runkel, and G. Schaumann, Orbifolds of n -dimensional defect TQFTs, Geom.\ Topol.\ 23 (2019) 781--864, arXiv:1705.06085

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Davydov, L

    A. Davydov, L. Kong, and I. Runkel, Field theories with defects and the centre functor, in: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory and Perturbative String Theory, Proc.\ Sympos.\ Pure Math.\ 83, AMS (2011), arXiv:1107.0495

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases, Geom.\ Topol.\ 25 (2021) 1165--1330, arXiv:1604.06527

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Ferrer, B

    G. Ferrer, B. Hungar, T. Johnson-Freyd, C. Krulewski, L. M\"uller, Nivedita, D. Penneys, D. Reutter, C. Scheimbauer, L. Stehouwer, and C. Vuppulury, Dagger n -categories, arXiv:2403.01651

  11. [19]

    Ferrer, L

    G. Ferrer, L. M\"uller, D. Penneys, and L. Stehouwer, The many faces of higher Hilbert spaces, arXiv:2606.11334

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, Quantum Topol.\ 15 (2024) 779--869, arXiv:2209.07471

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, J.\ High Energy Phys.\ 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Henriques and D

    A. Henriques and D. Penneys, Bicommutant categories from fusion categories, Selecta Math.\ 23 (2017) 1669--1708, arXiv:1511.05226

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    A. Kapustin, Topological field theory, higher categories, and their applications, in: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010 (ICM 2010), Vol.\ III, 2021--2043, Hindustan Book Agency (2010), arXiv:1004.2307

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Lurie, On the classification of topological field theories, in: Current Developments in Mathematics 2008, Int.\ Press (2009) 129--280, arXiv:0905.0465

    J. Lurie, On the classification of topological field theories, in: Current Developments in Mathematics 2008, Int.\ Press (2009) 129--280, arXiv:0905.0465

    2009 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M\"uller and L

    L. M\"uller and L. Stehouwer, Reflection structures and spin-statistics in low dimensions, Rev.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 37 (2025) 2450035, arXiv:2301.06664

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    M\"uller and L

    L. M\"uller and L. Stehouwer, Reflection positivity for once extended topological field theories, in preparation

  19. [27]

    M\"uller, On the higher categorical structure of topological defects in quantum field theories, arXiv:2505.04761

    L. M\"uller, On the higher categorical structure of topological defects in quantum field theories, arXiv:2505.04761

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Penneys, Unitary dual functors for unitary multitensor categories, High.\ Struct.\ 4 (2020) 22--56, arXiv:1808.00323

    D. Penneys, Unitary dual functors for unitary multitensor categories, High.\ Struct.\ 4 (2020) 22--56, arXiv:1808.00323

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Shao, What's done cannot be undone: TASI lectures on non-invertible symmetries, arXiv:2308.00747

    S.-H. Shao, What's done cannot be undone: TASI lectures on non-invertible symmetries, arXiv:2308.00747

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sch\"afer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries, Phys.\ Rept.\ 1063 (2024) 1--55, arXiv:2305.18296

    S. Sch\"afer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries, Phys.\ Rept.\ 1063 (2024) 1--55, arXiv:2305.18296

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Stehouwer and J

    L. Stehouwer and J. Steinebrunner, Dagger categories via anti-involutions and positivity, Theory Appl.\ Categ.\ 41 (2024) 2013--2040, arXiv:2304.02928

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Stehouwer, Unitary fermionic topological field theory, PhD thesis, Universit\"at Bonn (2024)

    L. Stehouwer, Unitary fermionic topological field theory, PhD thesis, Universit\"at Bonn (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.