Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Theory of Deterministic Photon-Loss Subspaces for Quantum Interferences

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a theory of deterministic photon-loss subspaces for linear lossy optical systems: if the scattering matrix has singular values only in $\{0,1\}$, the input Hilbert space splits into orthogonal subspaces in which photon…

desk verdict A correct but narrowly scoped reformulation of known SVD loss machinery, with two worthwhile new applications and an overclaimed 'general theory' that falls back on ancilla embedding. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07253 v1 pith:JCP4HKRJ submitted 2026-08-07 quant-ph

Yadi Niu , Haoyang Zhang , Zihan Mo , Nuo Wang , Ying Gu This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords deterministicphoton-losssubspacesingularvaluedecompositionnon-unitaryscatteringmatrixcoherentperfectabsorptionanti-HOMinterferencequantumstatedistillationW-stategenerationdecoherence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a theory of deterministic photon-loss subspaces (DPLSs) for linear lossy optical systems: when the scattering matrix's singular values are only 0 or 1, the input Hilbert space splits into orthogonal subspaces labelled by how many photons sit in the fully absorbing modes. Inside each subspace, photon loss becomes deterministic (every photon in a lossy mode is absorbed, every photon in a lossless mode passes through unitarily) and quantum coherence is preserved; between subspaces, decoherence turns the output into a statistical mixture. This gives an exact, analytical account of how quantum coherence, decoherence, and photon-number reduction jointly shape the evolution of quantum light in lossy devices, without the Langevin noise operators or ancilla embeddings of earlier approaches. On that basis the paper re-derives anti-Hong-Ou-Mandel interference and squeezed-state distillation, and shows how a three-port lossy system with one lossless mode robustly produces W-states from several different inputs. If the theory is right, loss becomes a structural resource for preparing quantum states rather than only an obstacle.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the DPLS itself: the orthogonal decomposition of the input Hilbert space into subspaces $\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{in}}_{\vec n}$ labelled by the photon-number distribution in the completely lossy modes defined by the singular value decomposition of the scattering matrix. The machinery is the SVD $M=U\Sigma V^\dagger$ with $\Sigma=\mathrm{diag}(1,\ldots,1,0,\ldots,0)$, read as three stages --- unitary rotation $V^\dagger$, diagonal non-unitary loss $\Sigma$, unitary rotation $U$ --- so that loss acts only on the modes with singular value 0. Projectors $\hat P_{\vec n}=\sum_{\vec m}|\varphi_{\vec m\vec n}\rangle\langle\varphi_{\vec m\vec n}|$ decompose any input, and the operator $\hat M_{\vec n}=\hat S_U\big(\prod_j (\hat a_j)^{n_j}/\sqrt{n_j!}\big)\hat S_{V^\dagger}$ implements each DPLS's evolution as deterministic annihilation followed by unitary transformation. The key identity is Eq. (20), where the output is the incoherent sum over DPLSs of coherently evolved projections, with weights $P_{\vec n}$ equal to the projection probabilities. This structure is what turns a non-unitary scattering problem into a solvable sum of fully coherent sub-evolutions.

What would settle it

Send the two-photon state $|11\rangle$ into the two-port coherent perfect absorber described by Eq. (26) and count output photons per port: the theory predicts a 50/50 mixture of the vacuum and a two-photon entangled state, so the probability of detecting exactly one photon in total must be zero. Any detected single-photon output would contradict the deterministic-loss claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a decomposition theorem for lossy linear optics. For an $N$-mode device with scattering matrix $M=U\Sigma V^\dagger$ whose singular values lie only in $\{0,1\}$, the lossless input modes $\hat b^{\mathrm{nls}\dagger}_j$ are those mapped to singular value 1 and the completely lossy input modes $\hat b^{\mathrm{ls}\dagger}_j$ are those mapped to singular value 0. Indexing the input Hilbert space by the photon-number distribution $\vec n$ in the lossy modes produces orthogonal subspaces $\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{in}}_{\vec n}$ (the DPLSs) that form a direct sum of the whole space; each has dimension $\binom{N_t+k-1}{N_t}$ fixed by the photon number $N_t$ in the $k$ lossless modes. The evolution of a projection onto $\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{in}}_{\vec n}$ is the operator $\hat M_{\vec n}=\hat S_U\big(\prod_j (\hat a_j)^{n_j}/\sqrt{n_j!}\big)\hat S_{V^\dagger}$ --- deterministic photon annihilation in the lossy modes followed by a unitary --- and because components in different DPLSs lose their relative coherence, the output is the mixture $\hat\rho_{\mathrm{out}}=\sum_{\vec n} P_{\vec n}\hat M_{\vec n}|\psi_{\vec n}\rangle\langle\psi_{\vec n}|\hat M^\dagger_{\vec n}$ (Eq. (20)). The paper argues this mixture structure is exactly the joint effect of quantum interference, photon-number reduction, and decoherence, and that the geometry of the subspaces can be engineered to control all three.

Load-bearing premise

The picture rests on every mode of the device being either perfectly transmitting or perfectly absorbing, with nothing in between; for devices with partial absorption the paper's own appendix has to add extra auxiliary modes, reintroducing exactly the extra structure the main text claims to avoid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the two-port coherent perfect absorber, the input $|11\rangle$ projects equally onto the lossless and fully-lossy DPLSs, which immediately explains anti-HOM interference and the zero-or-two-photon absorption rule: exactly one photon can never be absorbed.
  • Squeezed coherent inputs are distilled into a pure squeezed vacuum because every DPLS projection evolves to the same squeezed vacuum; the scheme extends to inputs with unequal coherent amplitudes provided $\alpha_1/\alpha_2=\tan\theta$, which amounts to engineering the DPLS geometry.
  • In a three-port lossy system with a single lossless mode, all one-dimensional DPLSs with one photon in the lossless mode evolve to the same W-state; postselecting the one-photon output yields $|W\rangle$ for various inputs with success probabilities 100%, 50%, and 33.3% in the paper's examples.
  • Because no ancilla modes are needed when singular values are 0 or 1, the theory produces explicit analytical output density matrices (such as the block-form Table I) without tracing out extra degrees of freedom.
  • All DPLS dimensions and the direct-sum decomposition generalize to higher mode numbers and arbitrary input photon numbers, pointing toward high-dimensional entanglement preparation and multi-qubit gates in non-Hermitian systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension not made in the paper: the same one-dimensional-DPLS logic used for W-states generalizes to other targets, since a device whose DPLSs are all one-dimensional acts as a deterministic filter mapping any input's projection onto a prescribed output; higher-$N$ W-states or graph-type states could be prepared by choosing $V^\dagger$ and $U$ accordingly.
  • Because the mixture weights $P_{\vec n}$ are set by the input state and the DPLS geometry alone, the theory yields quantitative predictions for output photon-number statistics and second-order correlations that could be tested on tunable-loss devices such as metasurfaces or coupled waveguides with adjustable absorption.
  • The block-mixture structure of Eq. (20) implies that coherence between different photon-number sectors is never regenerated by unitary post-processing once loss has occurred, suggesting a practical bound on distillation in lossy channels: only within-sector coherence is recoverable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 'deterministic photon-loss subspace' (DPLS) framework for linear lossy optical systems whose scattering matrix M has SVD singular values restricted to {0,1}. It defines complete-loss and lossless input modes via singular vectors, decomposes the input Hilbert space into orthogonal DPLSs labeled by the photon-number distribution in the lossy modes, and derives the output state as a statistical mixture of the coherently evolved projections, Eq. (20). The framework is applied to revisit anti-HOM interference and DV/CV state distillation in a two-port CPA-type system, and to design a three-port lossy system whose one-dimensional DPLSs allow post-selected W-state generation from several single-photon inputs. Appendix C sketches an extension to general singular values in [0,1] by enlarging the scattering matrix with ancilla modes, and Appendix A provides the ancilla-dilation derivation of Eq. (20).

Significance. For the sigma in {0,1} case the central derivation is coherent and self-contained: the projectors in Eq. (9) are orthonormal, the dimension formula Eq. (8) is correct, and the mixture formula Eq. (20) follows from tracing the ancilla dilation in Appendix A. The sigma in {0,1} regime covers coherent perfect absorption and transmission devices, and the article gives concrete, falsifiable predictions for the anti-HOM peak ratio and for post-selected W-state success probabilities; the W-state device is a genuine constructive design rather than a post hoc fit. The main weakness is that the advertised generality is not achieved: the extension to intermediate singular values in Appendix C reintroduces ancilla modes and is essentially the SVD-embedding procedure of Refs. [37-39], and even the sigma in {0,1} proof in Appendix A uses an ancilla dilation. The physical DPLS picture is therefore strongest if presented as a theory of perfect-absorption and perfect-transmission mode decompositions, not as a general ancilla-free theory of arbitrary lossy systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II C, last paragraph, and Appendix C] The final paragraph of Section II C states that the theory can be applied to scattering matrices with sigma in [0,1] by introducing an ancilla mode for each mode with sigma not in {0,1}, and Appendix C carries out this embedding. This contradicts the Section II claim that 'extra degrees of freedom are unnecessary' and places the general-sigma extension on the same footing as the SVD embedding methods of Refs. [37-39]. Because this is part of the advertised scope of the paper, please either restrict the generality claims to sigma in {0,1} throughout the title, abstract, and introduction, or supply a genuinely ancilla-free derivation for partial-loss modes.
  2. [Eq. (14)] In Eq. (14), the normalized state after the Sigma operation is written with a single amplitude D_mn and a ket with no summation over m; as printed, this is not the normalized projection |psi_n,mid2> that is used in Eqs. (15) and (20). Please correct the summation and normalization, or state explicitly that the equation defines an unnormalized component and that normalization is restored before Eq. (15).
  3. [Appendix A] The derivation of Eq. (20) in Appendix A explicitly introduces N ancilla modes and traces them out in Eq. (A5). The statement in Section II that 'extra degrees of freedom are unnecessary' is therefore also overstated for the sigma in {0,1} case: the DPLS output formula is obtained by an ancilla dilation, even though the final formula is on the physical Hilbert space. Please rephrase the claim to distinguish between the physical DPLS construction and the proof technique used to derive the loss mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected, including 'surpress' in Section I, 'rwo' in the discussion after Eq. (3), and 'resonable' in the data-availability statement.
  2. [Section II A, paragraph after Eq. (4)] The sentence 'The input photons in modes b_nls^dagger_j (k+1 <= j <= N) ... will be completely dissipated' should refer to the lossy modes b_ls^dagger_j, not the lossless modes; as written it contradicts the definitions in Eqs. (3) and (4).
  3. [Eqs. (19) and (A5)] The amplitudes D_mn / sqrt(P_n) are typeset in a way that can be misread as products D_mn sqrt(P_n); please use explicit division markers or parentheses throughout.
  4. [Section III B] The success probabilities of 100%, 50%, and 33.3% for W-state generation are post-selected single-photon output probabilities; although the main text does state that post-selection is used, the abstract and conclusion should make this explicit to avoid overclaiming deterministic generation.
  5. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] The 2x2 matrix S_i is presented with a row-vector-like layout in the displayed equation; please format it unambiguously as a two-row matrix so that the embedding into Sigma_ext is clear.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DPLS evolution formula is derived from the SVD without fitted parameters; the ancillary-mode extension in Appendix C is an acknowledged dilation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained linear algebra. Given a scattering matrix M=UΣV† with singular values only 0 or 1, the lossless and completely lossy input modes are defined directly from the columns of V, the input Hilbert space is decomposed by the photon-number distribution in the lossy modes, and the per-subspace evolution is constructed as S_U (annihilation of lossy modes) S_V†. The output statistical mixture in Eq. (20) follows from tracing over the loss channels in Appendix A, with no parameter fitted to any data and no load-bearing reliance on the authors' own prior work. The cited SVD-embedding works [37-39] are external results used as derivation tools, not as authorities that force the conclusion. The W-state application is constructive: the scattering matrix is designed so that its SVD factors realize the desired unitary mapping, and the quoted success probabilities are computed projections, not predictions obtained by fitting. Appendix C does extend the formalism to σ∈(0,1) by introducing ancilla modes, which weakens the main-text claim that extra degrees of freedom are unnecessary, but this is a scope/overclaim issue rather than a circular step: the extension explicitly identifies the embedding and traces the ancilla out. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict, and no fitted input is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the paper receives a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. Its assumptions are the standard unitary-dilation model of loss, the 0/1 singular-value restriction, and the orthonormality of SVD-transformed Fock basis states.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Loss in a linear optical system is described by a unitary dilation with vacuum ancilla modes; tracing out ancillas yields the physical output state.
    Invoked in Appendix A (Eqs. (A2)-(A5)) and standard in lossy beam splitter theory (Refs. [35-39]).
  • domain assumption The scattering matrix has singular values only in {0,1} for the main DPLS constructions.
    Eq. (2) and Section II restrict direct application to systems with perfect absorption/transmission modes; Appendix C extends to (0,1) by adding ancilla modes.
  • standard math The SVD-transformed modes b_nls and b_ls are independent bosonic modes forming an orthonormal basis of the input Hilbert space.
    Follows from unitarity of V and canonical commutation relations (Section II.B, Eq. (5)).
  • domain assumption For discrete-variable inputs the total photon number N_p is fixed and finite, so the relevant Hilbert space is finite-dimensional.
    Used in the DPLS dimension formula Eq. (8) and the DV examples; CV inputs are handled by Fock-sector projections in Section III.A.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theory of Deterministic Photon-Loss Subspaces for Quantum Interferences." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JCP4HKRJ

@misc{pith2026260807253,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theory of Deterministic Photon-Loss Subspaces for Quantum Interferences},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JCP4HKRJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07253}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum coherence, quantum decoherence, and photon number reduction are coexistent in linear lossy optical systems. However, how these three elements combine together to determine the evolution of the quantum light remains unclear. Here, based on singular value decomposition (SVD), we propose the theory of deterministic photon-loss subspace (DPLS) for quantum interferences in lossy systems. By performing an SVD of scattering matrices with singular values either 0 or 1, a series of completely lossy and lossless input modes are first defined. According to n_1,...,n_i photons in the first,..., i-th lossy modes, the Hilbert space of the input states can be decomposed into a set of orthogonal subspaces H_((n_1,...,n_i ))^in, i.e., deterministic photon-loss subspaces (DPLSs). When the concept of DPLS is established, the input state can be projected onto these DPLSs. In each DPLS, the photons in lossy modes will be completely dissipated, while those in lossless modes experience a unitary evolution. The output state is a statistical mixture of the evolved outcomes of all projections, since decoherence is a concurrent process. Then, based on the DPLS theory, we not only revisited Anti-HOM interference and the distillation of quantum states, but also demonstrate a robust W-state generation for various input states in a three-port lossy system with one-dimensional DPLSs. Through investigating the loss-induced subspace structure of the system, our general theory for analyzing quantum state evolution in lossy systems explicitly reveals the interplay among quantum coherence, quantum decoherence, and photon number reduction. By engineering the loss, the constructed DPLSs can be used to precisely control quantum interferences in dissipative systems, with potential applications in quantum state preparation, quantum logic operations, and other quantum information processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07253 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of DPLS theory. (a) Lossy linear optical system with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic of decomposing the input Hilbert space into DPLSs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of the input state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Constructed lossy system for robust W-state generation with three sequential parts: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Preparation of W-state in lossless system and lossy system, x axis and y axis correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (5), basis states of DPLSH 𝑖𝑛 ®𝑛 is actually transformed from Fock state|𝑚 1···𝑚 𝑘𝑛𝑘+1···𝑛 𝑁⟩by unitary matrix𝑉

    All DPLSsH in ®𝑛𝑖 span the whole Hilbert spaceH in: H in=H in ®𝑛1 +H in ®𝑛2 +....(B2) 2.H 𝑖𝑛 ®𝑛𝑖 are independent to each other: 0= ∑︁ 𝑖 |𝜓®𝑛𝑖⟩,|𝜓 ®𝑛𝑖⟩∈𝐻 in ®𝑛𝑖 ⇐⇒ ∀|𝜓®𝑛𝑖⟩=0.(B3) For condition 1, according to Eq. (5), basis states of DPLSH 𝑖𝑛 ®𝑛 is actually transformed from Fock state|𝑚 1···𝑚 𝑘𝑛𝑘+1···𝑛 𝑁⟩by unitary matrix𝑉. Therefore, The input Hilbert spa...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Heilmann, M

    R. Heilmann, M. Gr¨ afe, S. Nolte, and A. Szameit, A novel integrated quantum circuit for high-order W-state generation and its highly precise characterization, Sci. Bull.60, 96–100 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    ∑︁ ®𝑚 𝐷®𝑚®𝑛√𝑃®𝑛 |𝑚 1...𝑚 𝑘 0...0⟩ #

    (a)-(c) are results for lossless system, where W-state can no longer be obtained once the input varies. (d)-(f) are results for lossy system, by engineering DPLSs of the system, W-state can be prepared for various input states. According to SVD Eq. (39), there is only one lossless input mode ˆ𝑏nls 1 and two completely lossy input modes ˆ𝑏ls 2,3 ˆ𝑏nls† 1 =...

    work page

  4. [4]

    J. C. F. Matthews, A. Politi, D. Bonneau, and J. L. O’Brien, Heralding two-photon and four-photon path entanglement on a chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 163602 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Konno, W

    S. Konno, W. Asavanant, F. Hanamura, H. Nagayoshi, K. Fukui, A. Sakaguchi, R. Ide, F. China, M. Yabuno, S. Miki, H. Terai, K. Takase, M. Endo, P. Marek, R. Filip, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light, Science,383, 289–293 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Q. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Tian, Z. Tian, G. Li, X.-F. Ren, Q. Gong, and Y. Gu, Parallel beam splitting based on gradient metasurface: from classical to quantum, Opt. Express32, 31389 (2024). 40

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Q. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Tian, Z. Tian, G. Li, X.-F. Ren, Q. Gong, and Y. Gu, Multiphoton path-polarization entanglement through a single gradient metasurface, Adv. Photon. Nexus 4, 026002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    T. C. Ralph, N. K. Langford, T. B. Bell, and A. G. White, Linear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis, Phys. Rev. A65, 062324 (2002)

    work page 2002

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    H. F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Quantum phase gate for photonic qubits using only beam splitters and postselection, Phys. Rev. A66, 024308 (2002)

    2002

  2. [10]

    Q. Liu, Y. Tian, Z. Tan, Y. Jia, G. Li, X. F. Ren, Q. Gong, and Y. Gu, Quantum CZ gates on a single gradient metasurface, Light: Sci. Appl.14, 7 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Klauck, L

    F. Klauck, L. Teuber, M. Heinrich, S. Scheel, A. Szameit, and M. Ornigotti, Observation of PT-symmetric quantum interference, Nat. Photonics13, 883–888 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Zhou, Characterization of PT-symmetric quantum interference based on the coupled mode theory, Opt

    J. Zhou, Characterization of PT-symmetric quantum interference based on the coupled mode theory, Opt. Express30, 23600–23607 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Ma, Q. Liu, N. Wang, Y. Jia, Q. Zhang, Z. Bai, J. Zhang, Q. Gong, and Y. Gu, PT-phase diagram with quantum jump in a non-Hermitian photonic structure, Phys. Rev. A 109, L041503 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    A. N. Vetlugin, R. Guo, C. Soci, and N. I. Zheludev, Anti-Hong–Ou–Mandel interference by coherent perfect absorption of entangled photons, New J. Phys.24, 122001 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    F. U. J. Klauck, M. Heinrich, A. Szameit, and T. A. W. Wolterink, Crossing exceptional points in non-Hermitian quantum systems, Sci. Adv.11, eadr8275 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    K. Wang, S. J. U. White, A. Szameit, A. A. Sukhorukov, and A. S. Solntsev, Demonstration of lossy linear transformations and two-photon interference on a photonic chip, Phys. Rev. Research6, 043076 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Ehrhardt, M

    M. Ehrhardt, M. Heinrich, and A. Szameit, Observation-dependent suppression and enhance- ment of two-photon coincidences by tailored losses, Nat. Photonics16, 191–195 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    L. Hong, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, and L. Chen, Loss-assisted anomalous Hong-Ou-Mandel inter- ference based on nonunitary multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 023601 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Vest, M.-C

    B. Vest, M.-C. Dheur, ´E. Devaux, A. Baron, E. Rousseau, J.-P. Hugonin, J.-J. Greffet, G. Messin, and F. Marquier, Anti-coalescence of bosons on a lossy beam splitter, Science356, 1373–1376 (2017). 41

    2017

  12. [20]

    Q. Li, W. Bao, Z. Nie, Y. Xia, Y. Xue, Y. Wang, S. Yang, and X. Zhang, A non-unitary metasurface enables continuous control of quantum photon–photon interactions from bosonic to fermionic, Nature Photonics15, 267–271 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Y. Qin, H. Chen, D. Luo, C. Pan, H. Hu, Y. Zhang, and D. Wei, Quantum interference in anti-parity-time symmetric coupled waveguide system, Opt. Express29, 29175–29185 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Longhi, Quantum interference and exceptional points, Opt

    S. Longhi, Quantum interference and exceptional points, Opt. Lett.43, 5371–5374 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Fang, J.-L

    Y.-L. Fang, J.-L. Zhao, D.-X. Chen, Y.-H. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Q.-C. Wu, C.-P. Yang, and F. Nori, Entanglement dynamics in anti-PT-symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Research4, 033022 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    M. A. Selim, M. Ehrhardt, Y. Ding, H. M. Dinani, Q. Zhong, A. Perez-Leija, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, M. Heinrich, A. Szameit, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Selective filtering of pho- tonic quantum entanglement via anti–parity-time symmetry, Science387, 1424–1428 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    D.-X. Chen, Y. Zhang, J.-L. Zhao, Q.-C. Wu, Y.-L. Fang, C.-P. Yang, and F. Nori, Quantum state discrimination in a PT-symmetric system, Phys. Rev. A106, 022438 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Huang and G

    S. Huang and G. S. Agarwal, Coherent perfect absorption of path entangled single photons, Opt. Express22, 20936–20947 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Roger, S

    T. Roger, S. Vezzoli, E. Bolduc, J. Valente, J. J. F. Heitz, J. Jeffers, C. Soci, J. Leach, C. Couteau, N. I. Zheludev, and D. Faccio, Coherent perfect absorption in deeply subwavelength films in the single-photon regime, Nat. Commun.6, 7031 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Roger, S

    T. Roger, S. Restuccia, A. Lyons, D. Giovannini, J. Romero, J. Jeffers, M. Padgett, and D. Faccio, Coherent absorption of N00N states, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 023601 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Altuzarra, S

    C. Altuzarra, S. Vezzoli, J. Valente, W. Gao, C. Soci, D. Faccio, and C. Couteau, Coherent perfect absorption in metamaterials with entangled photons, ACS Photonics4, 2124–2128 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Jeffers, Nonlocal coherent perfect absorption, Phys

    J. Jeffers, Nonlocal coherent perfect absorption, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 143602 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    A. N. Vetlugin, Coherent perfect absorption of quantum light, Phys. Rev. A104, 013716 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    A. ¨U. C. Hardal and M. Wubs, Quantum coherent absorption of squeezed light, Optica6, 181–189 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Hern´ andez, A

    O. Hern´ andez, A. Ortega-Gomez, M. Bravo, and I. Liberal, Quantum interference in Wilkinson power dividers, Laser Photonics Rev.16, 2200095 (2022). 42

    2022

  26. [34]

    C. Wang, X. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Lu, Y. Chen, and L. Chen, High-dimensional frequency en- tanglement filter with anomalous Hong–Ou–Mandel interference, APL Photonics10, 011301 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    A. N. Vetlugin, R. Guo, C. Soci, and N. I. Zheludev, Deterministic generation of entanglement in a quantum network by coherent absorption of a single photon, Phys. Rev. A106, 012402 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Y. Lai, D. A. Clarke, P. Grimm, A. Devi, D. Wigger, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, R. Thomale, J.-S. Huang, B. Hecht, and O. Hess, Room-temperature quantum nanoplasmonic coherent perfect absorption, Nat. Commun.15, 6324 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    S. M. Barnett, C. R. Gilson, B. Huttner, and N. Imoto, Field commutation relations in optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1739 (1996)

    1996

  30. [38]

    S. M. Barnett, J. Jeffers, A. Gatti, and R. Loudon, Quantum optics of lossy beam splitters, Phys. Rev. A57, 2134 (1998)

    1998

  31. [39]

    Kn¨ oll, S

    L. Kn¨ oll, S. Scheel, E. Schmidt, D.-G. Welsch, and A. V. Chizhov, Quantum-state transfor- mation by dispersive and absorbing four-port devices, Phys. Rev. A59, 4716 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Hern´ andez and I

    O. Hern´ andez and I. Liberal, Generalized approach to quantum interference in lossy N-port devices via a singular value decomposition, Opt. Express30, 31267–31286 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Tischler, C

    N. Tischler, C. Rockstuhl, and K. S lowik, Quantum optical realization of arbitrary linear transformations allowing for loss and gain, Phys. Rev. X8, 021017 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    G¨ uhne and G

    O. G¨ uhne and G. T´ oth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep.474, 1–75 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    J. Gao, L. Santos, G. Krishna, Z.-S. Xu, A. Iovan, S. Steinhauer, O. G¨ uhne, P. J. Poole, D. Dalacu, V. Zwiller,et al., Scalable generation and detection of on-demand W states in nanophotonic circuits, Nano Lett.23, 5350–5357 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    S. B. Papp, K. S. Choi, H. Deng, P. Lougovski, S. J. van Enk, and H. J. Kimble, Characteri- zation of multipartite entanglement for one photon shared among four optical modes, Science 324, 764–768 (2009)

    2009

  37. [45]

    Gr¨ afe, R

    M. Gr¨ afe, R. Heilmann, A. Perez-Leija, R. Keil, F. Dreisow, M. Heinrich, H. Moya-Cessa, S. Nolte, D. N. Christodoulides, and A. Szameit, On-chip generation of high-order single-photon W-states, Nat. Photon.8, 791–795 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 58 (1994). 43

    1994

  39. [47]

    W. R. Clements, P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf, W. S. Kolthammer, and I. A. Walmsley, Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers, Optica3, 1460–1465 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Jeffers, Interference and the lossless lossy beam splitter, J

    J. Jeffers, Interference and the lossless lossy beam splitter, J. Mod. Opt.47, 1819–1824 (2000)

    2000

  41. [49]

    Hoffmann and R

    K. Hoffmann and R. A. Kunze,Linear Algebra(Prentice-Hall, Hoboken, NJ, 1971)

    1971

  42. [50]

    Zanotto and A

    S. Zanotto and A. Melloni, Design of a hybrid silicon-plasmonic co-propagating coupler oper- ating close to coherent perfect absorption, J. Appl. Phys.119, 164305 (2016). 44

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.