Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Onset of the transitional flux-avalanche regime in bulk NbTi controlled by the thermal boundary conductance

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A silver-doped thermal interface makes the flux-avalanche threshold of bulk NbTi non-monotonic in temperature, yielding the first bulk-superconductor signature of the transitional regime.

desk verdict Solid new observation of non-monotonic H_th(T) in bulk NbTi with a silver-loaded interface, but the 'direct signature of the transitional regime' label rests on an unmeasured bridge mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07324 v1 pith:L2YR37AA submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.supr-con

Irina Abaloszewa , Victor V. Chabanenko , Aleksander Abaloszew This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords thermomagneticfluxavalanchesthermalboundaryconductancetransitionalregimeNbTisuperconductorthresholdfieldtemperaturedependencemagneto-opticalimagingbridgingsilver-nonadecanecomposite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports an experimental test of the prediction that the threshold field for thermomagnetic avalanches in a bulk type-II superconductor becomes non-monotonic in temperature when the thermal boundary conductance $h$ between the superconductor and its coolant approaches the critical value $h_c$. Adding silver powder to the nonadecane interface layer of a bulk NbTi disk changes $H_{\mathrm{th}}(T)$ from a monotonically decreasing curve to one with a finite interval of positive slope $dH_{\mathrm{th}}/dT>0$ ending at $T^*\approx 6.1$--$6.4$ K, and at the highest silver loading the low-temperature decrease disappears altogether. Because the quasi-static stability interpolation predicts no such structure at the estimated coupling, the authors attribute the reversal to heat removal acting dynamically during the avalanche, and identify the sign change of $dH_{\mathrm{th}}/dT$ as a direct experimental signature of the onset of the transitional regime between thermally limited bulk behavior and electromagnetically controlled thin-film behavior. The result matters because flux avalanches limit superconducting magnets and circuits, and the threshold shape would give a non-invasive diagnostic of how well a superconductor is thermally coupled to its environment.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the thermal boundary conductance $h$ of the superconductor--environment interface, expressed through the ratio $h/h_c$, where $h_c=\rho_{\mathrm{ff}}j_c^2 d/(T_c-T)$ is the critical boundary conductance separating the thermally limited and electromagnetically controlled regimes. The experimental control variable is the temperature derivative of the threshold field, $dH_{\mathrm{th}}/dT$, whose sign distinguishes the regimes; the central observation is a positive-slope interval in a bulk sample whose interface coupling is still far below $h_c$. To raise $h$, the paper invokes discrete thermal bridging: at the sub-percolation silver concentrations used here, effective-medium theory predicts almost no enhancement, so the increase is attributed to sparse chains of silver particles in simultaneous contact with the disk and the cold finger. The quasi-static stability interpolation of Eq. (3) serves as the null hypothesis, and its failure at the estimated coupling is what motivates the dynamical interpretation. Avalanche morphology, quantified as the mean width of penetrating flux structures, is the second observable tied to the same crossover.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the thermal boundary conductance of the pure and silver-filled nonadecane layers in the 5--7 K range would settle the bridge picture: if the 25 wt.% silver layer does not raise $h$ to roughly $10^4\ \mathrm{W/(m^2\,K)}$, about $0.1\,h_c$, the non-monotonic threshold cannot be attributed to the transitional regime. The paper itself proposes a second test: in the transitional regime the amplitude of the non-monotonic structure should depend on the field sweep rate, while in the thermally limited regime it should not, so measuring $H_{\mathrm{th}}(T)$ at sweep rates differing by orders of magnitude would discriminate between dynamic heat removal and a static origin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the thermal boundary conductance is the control parameter that moves a bulk superconductor across the boundary between avalanche regimes, and that this boundary has now been reached experimentally. With a pure nonadecane interface the NbTi disk is deeply in the thermally limited regime, $h\sim 10^3\ \mathrm{W/(m^2\,K)}\ll h_c\sim 10^5\ \mathrm{W/(m^2\,K)}$, and $H_{\mathrm{th}}(T)$ decreases monotonically. Dispersing 10 or 25 wt.% silver in the same 100-$\mu$m layer produces a threshold that falls, rises over a finite temperature interval, peaks at a silver-independent $T^*\approx 6.1$--$6.4$ K, and then falls again; at 50 wt.% the low-temperature fall is absent and the threshold is flat up to $T^*$. The paper argues that sparse silver-particle bridges spanning the layer raise $h/h_c$ from about 0.01 to about 0.1, and that the failure of the quasi-static interpolation to reproduce the observed structure indicates that heat removal during the avalanche itself, rather than a static conductance change, is what reverses the temperature slope. The same temperature window sees the avalanche morphology change from narrow channeled fingers to broad fronts, linking the threshold reversal to the dynamics of the instability.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation depends on the premise that sparse silver-particle chains actually bridge the 100-$\mu$m nonadecane layer and raise the boundary conductance $h$ from about $10^3$ to about $10^4\ \mathrm{W/(m^2\,K)}$; the bridge density is not measured independently, and if the interface conductance is not actually increased, the non-monotonic $H_{\mathrm{th}}(T)$ could have another origin and would not directly establish the transitional regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The sign of $dH_{\mathrm{th}}/dT$ becomes a non-invasive diagnostic of thermal coupling: a positive-slope interval marks $h$ approaching $h_c$, refining the sign criterion proposed in the preceding study.
  • With only the interface changed, the same disk now spans the thermally limited regime, the transitional onset, and the trend toward the electromagnetically controlled regime, making the thermal boundary conductance the single control parameter of the crossover.
  • Because $T^*$ is set by the intrinsic temperature dependences of $j_c$, $C$, and $\kappa$ rather than by silver content, the location of the threshold maximum is material-specific and can be sought in other bulk superconductors.
  • The avalanche front width rises from narrow channels to broad fronts across the same temperature window, providing a second observable tied to the onset of the transitional regime.
  • The amplitude of the non-monotonic structure should acquire a dependence on field sweep rate in the transitional regime, which the paper identifies as a planned test of the dynamic heat-removal mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bridge mechanism is correct, dispersing metal particles in an interface layer could tune other bulk superconductors through the transitional regime, with particle loading and geometry controlling how close $h/h_c$ comes to unity.
  • A direct thermal measurement of the silver-loaded layers in the 5--7 K range could turn the shape of $H_{\mathrm{th}}(T)$ into a calibrated, contact-free probe of interface conductance in magnet and circuit applications.
  • The morphology-width crossover at a material-specific temperature suggests that interface engineering, rather than a change of superconducting material, may be the practical lever for suppressing flux avalanches in trapped-field magnets.
  • The failure of the quasi-static interpolation implies that a full dynamical theory of the transitional regime is needed to predict the amplitude of the threshold structure; simulating the same disk with dynamical heat removal and comparing the predicted $H_{\mathrm{th}}(T)$ shape would be a natural next test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports magneto-optical imaging measurements of the avalanche threshold field H_th(T) in a bulk NbTi disk with pure nonadecane and silver-filled nonadecane thermal interfaces. With the pure interface, H_th(T) decreases monotonically with temperature; with 10 and 25 wt.% Ag, the threshold becomes non-monotonic, showing an interval of positive slope dH_th/dT > 0 that ends at T* approximately 6.1 to 6.4 K; with 50 wt.% Ag, the low-temperature decrease is replaced by a flat branch up to the same T*. The authors interpret the positive-slope interval as a direct experimental signature of the onset of the transitional regime between thermally limited and electromagnetically controlled avalanche instability, attributing the effect to an increase in the thermal boundary conductance h produced by sparse silver bridges across the nonadecane layer. They also report a morphological crossover from narrow channeled fingers to broad fronts over the same temperature window and show that a quasi-static Mints-Rakhmanov interpolation cannot reproduce the non-monotonic shape at the assumed coupling.

Significance. If the thermal-boundary-conductance enhancement is established, the result would be significant: it would provide the first bulk experimental realization of the intermediate-coupling regime, completing an experimental sequence of avalanche regimes spanned by a single control parameter, and would offer a non-invasive diagnostic of thermal coupling in superconducting elements. The paper has several genuine strengths: the same NbTi disk and the same type of indicator film are used throughout, a pure-nonadecane baseline is included, three compositions are studied, the 50 wt.% composition was measured in two independent runs, the field-cooling protocol is checked for one threshold value, the morphology is quantified with a standard local-thickness construction, and the quasi-static interpolation is explicitly tested as a null hypothesis. The paper also identifies a falsifiable prediction, the planned sweep-rate dependence of the amplitude. These strengths make the empirical observation credible.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV A, Eq. (1) and bridge-density estimate] The central inference that silver raises h/h_c from about 0.01 to about 0.1 is not supported by a direct measurement. The Maxwell-Garnett estimate in Eq. (1) gives only a 3-23% conductivity enhancement for the three compositions, leaving h around 1.0-1.2e3 W/(m^2 K), essentially unchanged from pure nonadecane. The sparse-bridge mechanism is introduced as a plausible possibility, and the bridge density N about 10^2 mm^-2 is inferred from the value needed to reach h_br about 1e4 W/(m^2 K), not from observation; the paper explicitly states that 'the bridge density is not known independently.' The observed change in H_th(T) could in principle arise from other interface-related effects, such as discrete mechanical contact spots or altered local nucleation conditions, which are not excluded. Because the title, abstract, and conclusion assert that the non-monotonic H_th(T) is a direct signature of the transitional regime controlled by the thermal boundary conductance, this gap is load-bearing. I would ask the authors either to provide a direct measurement of the interface conductance or cross-sectional microscopy showing spanning silver chains, or to reframe the central claim as consistent with, but not demonstrative of, the transitional-regime interpretation.
  2. [Sec. IV B and Appendix A, Eq. (3)] The null-hypothesis calculation is performed at h/h_c approximately 0.1, which is exactly the value that rests on the unverified bridge model. The finding that Eq. (3) predicts no non-monotonic structure therefore does not by itself establish a dynamical transitional regime; it establishes that the quasi-static model with the assumed coupling cannot explain the data. If h is not actually raised, the same calculation predicts a monotonic H_th(T), and the observed positive-slope interval would require a different explanation. A definitive test would combine a direct measurement of h with the interpolation over a range of h values, or would demonstrate the predicted ramp-rate dependence, which is currently only planned. The argument by exclusion is valuable, but it is not sufficient to identify the mechanism uniquely.
  3. [Sec. III and Fig. 1] The non-monotonic shape for the 10 and 25 wt.% compositions is based on single mountings, and the individual H_th points are shown without error bars; the stated 10-20% rise is acknowledged to depend on the smoothing used to locate the extrema. The point-to-point scatter is described as an estimate of the spread, but no quantitative significance criterion is provided, and there are no repeated independent runs for these two compositions at the threshold-field level. The claim that the positive-slope interval is a robust feature would be materially strengthened by repeated independent runs, as was done for the 50 wt.% composition, and by a quantitative statement of how the rise compares with the scatter. Without this, a reader cannot independently assess whether the minimum-maximum structure is statistically secure.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Data availability] Given that several claims rest on point-by-point scatter, please include a table or repository with the individual H_th values and the corresponding temperatures, protocols, and compositions; the current statement that the data are available only upon reasonable request makes independent verification difficult.
  2. [References] The DOI given for Ref. [15] (10.1103/lq5f-lvh7) appears unusual and should be verified against the published record.
  3. [Sec. IV B] The statement that the observed 10-20% rise exceeds the static prediction by an order of magnitude is hard to reconcile with the earlier statement that the precise value depends on smoothing and is not used quantitatively; please clarify which comparison is intended.
  4. [Sec. II] The equivalence of the zero-field-cooled and field-cooled protocols is verified for a single threshold value; please state explicitly how many points on each H_th(T) curve were obtained with each protocol, or show them in Fig. 1 with different symbols.
  5. [Fig. 2] Please state in the caption or text how many avalanches were used for each mean-width value and whether the plotted quantity is the mean or median of the local-thickness distribution.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The transitional-regime attribution uses a bridge density back-calculated from the desired h/h_c≈0.1; the measured H_th(T) shape itself is independent, so circularity is partial.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV A (Thermal bridges and characteristic timescales), used in the Conclusion (Section V)]
    "The bridge density is not known independently, and we ask instead what density would be required. For the 25 wt.% composition, N∼10^2 mm^-2 bridges would provide h_br∼1×10^4 W/(m^2·K), an order of magnitude above the bulk effective-medium estimate. The corresponding ratio is h/h_c ≈0.1 at 5.8 K, an order of magnitude closer to the transition than for the pure nonadecane interface, where h/h_c ≈0.01."

    N is not measured or independently bounded; it is back-calculated so that h_br ~10^4 W/(m^2·K), which by construction gives h/h_c ~0.1. The paper then uses this same h/h_c as an estimate 'consistent with the onset of the transition' and as support for attributing the observed H_th(T) structure to the transitional regime. The consistency check is tautological: the assumed bridge density is chosen to produce the h/h_c value that is then quoted as evidence. The non-monotonic H_th(T) itself is an independent empirical result, but the quantitative bridge to the transitional regime is self-generated rather than measured.

full rationale

The central measurement is not circular: H_th(T) is measured on the same NbTi disk as in Ref. [15] but with a modified interface; the pure-nonadecane baseline is remeasured, and the h_c value is taken from a standard Mints-Rakhmanov formula with parameters established previously rather than fitted to the new curves. The quasi-static interpolation is used as a null hypothesis, and the paper honestly shows it fails to reproduce the observed structure at the estimated coupling. The main circular step is interpretive: the sparse-bridge density needed to raise h is not known independently; the paper asks what density would be 'required', fixes N≈10^2 mm^-2 to reach h_br≈10^4 W/(m^2·K), and then reports h/h_c≈0.1 as an estimate consistent with the transitional regime. That consistency is by construction. The self-citation of Ref. [15] provides the prediction and the h_c scale, but the test is empirical and could have falsified the prediction, so it is not load-bearing circularity on its own. Data non-availability and the absence of per-point error bars are evidence limitations, not circularity. Overall, partial circularity in the mechanistic interpretation, but the observed non-monotonic H_th(T) is independent and nontrivial.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The experimental observation is fairly self-contained, but the interpretation depends on several unverified modeling assumptions: standard critical-state and linear-stability frameworks, and especially the existence of unobserved silver thermal bridges with a back-calculated density. No independent measurement of the thermal boundary conductance of the composite layers is provided.

free parameters (1)
  • Ag bridge areal density N = approximately 10^2 mm^-2 (estimated, not measured)
    Section IV A: the density required to produce h_br about 10^4 W/(m2 K) and h/h_c about 0.1 is back-calculated. No independent measurement of the bridge density is provided.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Bean critical-state model and the Clem-Sanchez thin-disk field profiles describe the flux state during the field ramp and field-cooling protocols.
    Invoked in Section II to justify the two-step field excursion and in Appendix C through Eq. (C2).
  • domain assumption The Mints-Rakhmanov linear-stability framework and the interpolation of Eq. (3) describe the quasi-static threshold, used as a null hypothesis.
    Section IV B and Appendix A evaluate Eq. (3) to show it predicts no structure at the estimated coupling.
  • ad hoc to paper Silver particles form sparse thermal bridges spanning the nonadecane layer, with a density sufficient to raise h/h_c to about 0.1.
    Section IV A proposes the bridge picture and back-calculates the required density because the actual bridge density is not known independently.
  • domain assumption Eddy-current braking by the sub-percolation silver particles is negligible.
    Section IV B argues that isolated micrometer-scale particles support only negligible eddy currents, without a quantitative estimate.
  • domain assumption The indicator film and mirror, common to all series, cannot produce the observed differences between compositions.
    Section II states the indicator type is the same in all series, while absolute calibration may differ between mountings and comparisons rely on shape within each series.
invented entities (1)
  • Sparse silver thermal bridges spanning the nonadecane layer
    purpose: To explain how dilute silver powder raises the thermal boundary conductance beyond the effective-medium prediction, giving h/h_c approximately 0.1.
    Section IV A: the bridge density is not observed or measured; the authors estimate only what density would be required. No falsifiable handle outside this paper is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Onset of the transitional flux-avalanche regime in bulk NbTi controlled by the thermal boundary conductance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L2YR37AA

@misc{pith2026260807324,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Onset of the transitional flux-avalanche regime in bulk NbTi controlled by the thermal boundary conductance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L2YR37AA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07324}
}
abstract

Thermomagnetic avalanches in type-II superconductors occur in two qualitatively different regimes, electromagnetically controlled in thin films and thermally limited in bulk samples, distinguished by the sign of the temperature derivative of the threshold field $H_\text{th}(T)$. The two regimes are separated by a critical thermal boundary conductance $h_c$, and a non-monotonic $H_\text{th}(T)$ has been predicted in the transitional region where the interface conductance $h$ approaches $h_c$. We approach this region in a bulk NbTi disk by raising the interface coupling above the pure-nonadecane baseline with a silver-filled interface layer. Whereas the pure interface gives a monotonically decreasing $H_\text{th}(T)$, the silver-filled interface produces a non-monotonic dependence not previously realized in a bulk superconductor: a temperature interval of positive slope, $dH_\text{th}/dT > 0$, terminating in a maximum at $T^* \approx 6.1$--$6.4$~K. The effect is reproduced for two independent silver-filled compositions; in a third, with the highest loading, the low-temperature decrease is absent altogether and $H_\text{th}(T)$ is flat up to the same $T^*$, the evolution expected for stronger coupling. The position of the maximum is set by the intrinsic properties of NbTi, independent of the silver content. The onset of the positive-slope interval coincides in temperature with a change of the avalanche morphology from narrow channeled fingers to broad fronts. The reversal of the sign of $dH_\text{th}/dT$ is a direct experimental signature of the onset of the transitional regime, in which heat removal during the instability becomes dynamically relevant.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07324 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Temperature dependence of the threshold field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Magneto-optical images of the avalanche morphol [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Shapes admitted by the quasi-static interpolation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. S. Swartz and C. P. Bean, A model for mag- netic instabilities in hard superconductors: the adia- batic critical state, J. Appl. Phys.39, 4991 (1968), DOI:10.1063/1.1655898

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1655898 1968

  2. [2]

    S. L. Wipf, Magnetic instabilities in type-II su- perconductors, Phys. Rev.161, 404 (1967), DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.161.404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.161.404 1967

  3. [3]

    R. G. Mints and A. L. Rakhmanov, Critical state stability in type-II superconductors and superconducting-normal- metal composites, Rev. Mod. Phys.53, 551 (1981), DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.53.551

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.53.551 1981

  4. [4]

    Colauto, M

    F. Colauto, M. Motta, and W. A. Ortiz, Controlling mag- netic flux penetration in low-T c superconducting films and hybrids, Supercond. Sci. Technol.34, 013002 (2021), DOI:10.1088/1361-6668/abac1e

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/abac1e 2021

  5. [5]

    Xue, H.-X

    C. Xue, H.-X. Ren, P. Jia, Q.-Y. Wang, W. Liu, X.- J. Ou, L.-T. Sun, and A. V. Silhanek, Holistic numerical simulation of a quenching process on a real-size multifila- mentary superconducting coil, Nat. Commun.15, 10454 (2024), DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-54406-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54406-8 2024

  6. [6]

    J. I. Vestg ˚ arden, T. H. Johansen, and Y. M. Galperin, Nucleation and propagation of thermomagnetic avalanches in thin-film superconductors, Low Temp. Phys.44, 460 (2018), DOI:10.1063/1.5037549

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5037549 2018

  7. [7]

    D. V. Denisov, A. L. Rakhmanov, D. V. Shantsev, Y. M. Galperin, and T. H. Johansen, Dendritic and uni- form flux jumps in superconducting films, Phys. Rev. B 73, 014512 (2006), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.014512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.014512 2006

  8. [8]

    U. Bolz, B. Biehler, D. Schmidt, B.-U. Runge, and P. Leiderer, Dynamics of the dendritic flux instability in YBa 2Cu3O7−δ films, Europhys. Lett.64, 517 (2003), DOI:10.1209/epl/i2003-00261-y

    work page doi:10.1209/epl/i2003-00261-y 2003

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Nulens, N

    L. Nulens, N. Lejeune, J. Caeyers, S. Marinkovi´ c, I. Cools, H. Dausy, S. Basov, B. Raes, M. J. Van Bael, A. Geresdi, A. V. Silhanek, and J. Van de Vondel, Catastrophic magnetic flux avalanches in NbTiN super- conducting resonators, Commun. Phys.6, 267 (2023), DOI:10.1038/s42...

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    M. R. Wertheimer and J. le G. Gilchrist, Flux jumps in type II superconductors, J. Phys. Chem. Solids28, 2509 (1967), DOI:10.1016/0022-3697(67)90038-8

    1967 doi

  3. [11]

    Vasiliev, A

    S. Vasiliev, A. Nabia lek, V. Chabanenko, V. Rusakov, S. Piechota, and H. Szymczak, The structure of thermomagnetic avalanches in superconducting disc of NbTi, Acta Phys. Pol. A109, 661 (2006), DOI:10.12693/APhysPolA.109.661

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    V. V. Chabanenko, E. I. Kuchuk, V. F. Rusakov, I. Abaloszewa, A. Nabia lek, and F. P´ erez-Rodr ´ ıguez, Transformation of the critical state in hard supercon- ductors resulting from thermomagnetic avalanches, Low Temp. Phys.42, 239 (2016), DOI:10.1063/1.4947599

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    V. V. Chabanenko, A. Nabia lek, and R. Pu´ zniak, Multi- steps magnetic flux entrance/exit at thermomagnetic avalanches in the plates of hard superconductors, Ma- terials15, 2037 (2022), DOI:10.3390/ma15062037

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    V. V. Chabanenko, A. Nabia lek, R. Pu´ zniak, and V. F. Rusakov, Avalanche dynamics of magnetic flux in the Nb-Ti superconducting ring, Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol.36, 035010 (2023), DOI:10.1088/1361-6668/acb10f

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Abaloszewa, V

    I. Abaloszewa, V. V. Chabanenko, and A. Abaloszew, Thermally controlled flux avalanche dynamics in the bulk superconductor NbTi, Phys. Rev. B113, 104511 (2026), DOI:10.1103/lq5f-lvh7

    2026 doi

  8. [16]

    Fracasso, R

    M. Fracasso, R. Gerbaldo, G. Ghigo, D. Torsello, Y. Xing, P. Bernstein, J. Noudem, and L. Gozzelino, Comparison of the field trapping ability of MgB 2 and hybrid disc-shaped layouts, Materials17, 1201 (2024), DOI:10.3390/ma17051201

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    Fracasso, Y

    M. Fracasso, Y. Xing, P. Bernstein, J. Noudem, G. Ghigo, R. Gerbaldo, and L. Gozzelino, Thermo- magnetic instabilities in MgB 2 bulk magnets: a combined experimental and numerical investigation, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.36, 6800607 (2026), DOI:10.1109/TASC.2026.3667128

    2026

  10. [18]

    Abaloszewa, M

    I. Abaloszewa, M. Z. Cieplak, and A. Abaloszew, Thermomagnetic instabilities in Nb films deposited on 10 glass substrates, Acta Phys. Pol. A143, 123 (2023), DOI:10.12693/APhysPolA.143.123

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    A. V. Gurevich and R. G. Mints, Self-heating in normal metals and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 941 (1987), DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.59.941

    1987 doi

  12. [20]

    C. P. Bean, Magnetization of high-field super- conductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.36, 31 (1964), DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.36.31

    1964 doi

  13. [21]

    J. R. Clem and A. Sanchez, Hysteretic ac losses and sus- ceptibility of thin superconducting disks, Phys. Rev. B 50, 9355 (1994), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.9355

    1994 doi

  14. [22]

    D. A. D. Chaves, I. M. de Ara´ ujo, D. Carmo, F. Colauto, A. A. M. de Oliveira, A. M. H. de Andrade, T. H. Jo- hansen, A. V. Silhanek, W. A. Ortiz, and M. Motta, En- hancing the effective critical current density in a Nb su- perconducting thin film by cooling in an inhomogeneo...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    D. A. D. Chaves, J. C. Corsaletti Filho, E. A. Abbey, D. Bosworth, Z. H. Barber, M. G. Blamire, T. H. Jo- hansen, A. V. Silhanek, W. A. Ortiz, and M. Motta, Using quantitative magneto-optical imaging to reveal why the ac susceptibility of superconducting films is his- tory ind...

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    A. V. Silhanek, L. Jiang, C. Xue, and B. Vanderheyden, Impact of border defects on the magnetic flux penetration in superconducting films, Appl. Phys. Rev.12, 041324 (2025), DOI:10.1063/5.0282694

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    Brisbois, O.-A

    J. Brisbois, O.-A. Adami, J. I. Avila, M. Motta, W. A. Ortiz, N. D. Nguyen, P. Vanderbemden, B. Van- derheyden, R. B. G. Kramer, and A. V. Silhanek, Mag- netic flux penetration in Nb superconducting films with lithographically defined microindentations, Phys. Rev. B 93, 054521...

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Blanco Alvarez, J

    S. Blanco Alvarez, J. Brisbois, S. Melinte, R. B. G. Kramer, and A. V. Silhanek, Statistics of thermomagnetic breakdown in Nb superconducting films, Sci. Rep.9, 3659 (2019), DOI:10.1038/s41598-019- 39337-5

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Hildebrand and P

    T. Hildebrand and P. R¨ uegsegger, A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images, J. Microsc.185, 67 (1997), DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x

    1997

  20. [28]

    I. A. Rudnev, D. V. Shantsev, T. H. Johansen, and A. E. Primenko, Avalanche-driven fractal flux distribu- tions in NbN superconducting films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 042502 (2005), DOI:10.1063/1.1992673

    2005 doi

  21. [29]

    J. I. Vestg ˚ arden, D. V. Shantsev, Y. M. Galperin, and T. H. Johansen, Dynamics and morphology of dendritic flux avalanches in superconducting films, Phys. Rev. B 84, 054537 (2011), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.054537

    2011 doi

  22. [30]

    I. Y. Forero-Sandoval, F. Cervantes-Alvarez, J. A. Ramirez-Rincon, J. D. Macias, N. W. Pech-May, J. Ordonez-Miranda, and J. J. Alvarado-Gil, Percolation threshold of the thermal, electrical and optical properties of carbonyl-iron microcomposites, Appl. Compos. Mater. 28, 447 (...

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1873),https://archive. org/details/electricandmagne01maxwrich/

  24. [32]

    C.-W. Nan, R. Birringer, D. R. Clarke, and H. Gleiter, Effective thermal conductivity of particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance, J. Appl. Phys.81, 6692 (1997), DOI:10.1063/1.365209

    1997 doi

  25. [33]

    Rastgarkafshgarkolaei, Y

    R. Rastgarkafshgarkolaei, Y. Zeng, and J. M. Kho- dadadi, A molecular dynamics study of the effect of thermal boundary conductance on thermal transport of ideal crystal of n-alkanes with different number of carbon atoms, J. Appl. Phys.119, 205107 (2016), DOI:10.1063/1.4952411

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    D. A. G. Bruggeman, Calculation of various physics constants in heterogeneous substances. I. Dielectric- ity constants and conductivity of mixed bodies from isotropic substances, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)416, 636 (1935), DOI:10.1002/andp.19354160705

    1935 doi

  27. [35]

    E. J. Kramer, Scaling laws for flux pinning in hard superconductors, J. Appl. Phys.44, 1360 (1973), DOI:10.1063/1.1662353

    1973 doi

  28. [36]

    J. I. Vestg ˚ arden, D. V. Shantsev, Y. M. Galperin, and T. H. Johansen, Lightning in superconductors, Sci. Rep. 2, 886 (2012), DOI:10.1038/srep00886

    2012 doi

  29. [37]

    A. L. Rakhmanov, D. V. Shantsev, Y. M. Galperin, and T. H. Johansen, Finger patterns produced by thermo- magnetic instability in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 70, 224502 (2004), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.224502

    2004 doi

  30. [38]

    J. I. Vestg ˚ arden, Y. M. Galperin, and T. H. Johansen, The thermomagnetic instability in superconducting films with adjacent metal layer, J. Low Temp. Phys.173, 303 (2013), DOI:10.1007/s10909-013-0899-1

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    D. V. Denisov, D. V. Shantsev, Y. M. Galperin, E.-M. Choi, H.-S. Lee, S.-I. Lee, A. V. Bobyl, P. E. Goa, A. A. F. Olsen, and T. H. Johansen, Onset of dendritic flux avalanches in superconduct- ing films, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 077002 (2006), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.077002

    2006 doi

  32. [40]

    Colauto, E

    F. Colauto, E. Choi, J. Y. Lee, S. I. Lee, E. J. Pati˜ no, M. G. Blamire, T. H. Johansen, and W. A. Ortiz, Sup- pression of flux avalanches in superconducting films by electromagnetic braking, Appl. Phys. Lett.96, 092512 (2010), DOI:10.1063/1.3350681

    2010 doi

  33. [41]

    E. H. Brandt, Thin superconductors in a perpendicular magnetic ac field. II. circular disk, Phys. Rev. B50, 4034 (1994), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.4034

    1994 doi

  34. [42]

    I. S. Aranson, A. Gurevich, M. S. Welling, R. J. Wi- jngaarden, V. K. Vlasko-Vlasov, V. M. Vinokur, and U. Welp, Dendritic flux avalanches and nonlocal electrodynamics in thin superconduct- ing films, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 037002 (2005), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.037002

    2005 doi

  35. [43]

    Baziljevich, E

    M. Baziljevich, E. Baruch-El, T. H. Johansen, and Y. Yeshurun, Dendritic instability in YBa2Cu3O7−δ films triggered by transient magnetic fields, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 012602 (2014), DOI:10.1063/1.4887374

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    V. V. Chabanenko, I. Abaloszewa, V. F. Rusakov, O. I. Kuchuk, O. M. Chumak, A. Nabia lek, A. Abaloszew, A. Filippov, R. Pu´ zniak, and R. Es- cudero, Magnetic induction and its evaluation in superconducting disc under electromagnetic expo- sure, Supercond. Sci. Technol.39, 035...

    2026 doi

  37. [45]

    Bottura, A practical fit for the critical surface of NbTi, IEEE Trans

    L. Bottura, A practical fit for the critical surface of NbTi, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.10, 1054 (2000), DOI:10.1109/77.828413

    2000 doi

  38. [46]

    R. G. Mints and E. H. Brandt, Flux jumping in thin films, Phys. Rev. B54, 12421 (1996), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.12421

    1996 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.