Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 43 references

GIM and Elliptic Lie algebras via Ringel--Hall Lie algebras

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every symmetrizable GIM algebra is a Ringel–Hall Lie algebra of a 2-periodic orbit category.

desk verdict A credible categorical realization of GIM algebras that is missing a key verification in exactly the positive GIM case, plus an elliptic section that promises more than it proves. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07877 v1 pith:QTMUEAWN submitted 2026-08-08 math.RT math.CTmath.RA

Changjian Fu , Zhanhong Liang , Ming Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.CTmath.RA MSC 17B3716E6018G80
keywords Ringel–HallLiealgebraGIMgeneralizedintersectionmatrixellipticorbitcategory2-periodictriangulatedvaluedquiverKac–Moody
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that every symmetrizable generalized intersection matrix (GIM) algebra can be built from the Ringel–Hall Lie algebra of a 2-periodic triangulated category. For a GIM matrix $C$ the authors construct an acyclic valued quiver with an involution $\theta$, form the orbit category $\mathcal{D}/(\theta\circ\Sigma)$ of the bounded derived category, and prove the GIM algebra $\operatorname{gim}(C)$ is isomorphic to the integral Ringel–Hall Lie algebra of this category. That gives the first direct categorical realization of GIM algebras in the Peng–Xiao style, extending the classical realization of Kac–Moody algebras. For elliptic Lie algebras of types $D_4$, $E_6$, $E_7$, $E_8$, the same machinery yields a surjective homomorphism to the corresponding integral Ringel–Hall Lie algebra, injective on the Cartan subalgebra and on real root spaces.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the orbit category $\mathcal{D}/(\theta\circ\Sigma)$: $\theta$ is the involution on the acyclic valued quiver that swaps each vertex $i$ with its barred copy $\bar{i}$, and $\Sigma$ is the shift functor of the bounded derived category $\mathcal{D}$ of representations of $(Q,\mathbf{d})$; composing $\theta$ with $\Sigma$ produces a 2-periodic triangulated category by Keller's orbit category criterion. The symmetric Euler form of this category has matrix $DC$ in the basis of the simples, which is exactly the Cartan data of the GIM algebra. Peng–Xiao's construction turns the category into a Lie algebra generated by $u_X$ for indecomposables and $h_X$ for the Grothendieck group; the proof that the Serre relations of $\operatorname{gim}(C)$ hold is a Hall-number computation, reducing triangles in the orbit category to short exact sequences in $\operatorname{rep}(Q)$. In the elliptic case the same recipe is applied to a quotient algebra of global dimension 2, where a second cohomology contribution replaces the missing arrows so that the Euler form reproduces the elliptic Cartan matrix.

What would settle it

Check whether $(\operatorname{ad}u_{S_1})^3u_{S_{\bar{6}}}=0$ holds in $g(\mathcal{M})_{(q-1)}$ for type $E_8$ by computing the Hall numbers from the projective resolutions of the simple modules; a nonzero bracket would disprove Lemma 5.5 and hence Theorem 5.7. For Theorem A, test the $c_{ij}>0$ relation, for example with $C=\begin{pmatrix}2&1\\1&2\end{pmatrix}$, by explicit computation of $[u_{S_1},u_{S_2}]$ and $(\operatorname{ad}u_{S_1})^2u_{S_{\bar{2}}}$ in the orbit category.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4.17: for any symmetrizable GIM matrix $C$, the GIM algebra $\operatorname{gim}(C)$ is isomorphic to $L_C(\mathcal{D}/(\theta\circ\Sigma))\otimes_\mathbb{Z}\mathbb{C}$, where $\mathcal{D}$ is the bounded derived category of representations of the associated acyclic valued quiver $(Q,\mathbf{d})$ and $\theta$ is the involution swapping each vertex with its barred copy. The isomorphism sends the Chevalley generators $\tilde{e}_i$, $\tilde{f}_i$, $\tilde{h}_i$ to $\tilde{u}_{S_i}$, $-\tilde{u}_{S_{\bar{i}}}$, and $\tilde{h}_{S_i}/\tilde{d}_{S_i}$. The construction fits into a commutative diagram with Berman's fixed-point embedding of $\operatorname{gim}(C)$ into a Kac–Moody algebra, so it categorifies that embedding. For elliptic Lie algebras, Theorem 5.7 produces a surjective Lie algebra homomorphism from the elliptic Lie algebra to the integral Ringel–Hall Lie algebra of the 2-periodic category coming from a quotient of the quiver; the map preserves the root lattice grading and is injective on real root spaces and the Cartan subalgebra, with full injectivity left as a conjecture.

Load-bearing premise

Across both theorems the load-bearing premise is that the claimed Serre relations actually hold in the integral Ringel–Hall Lie algebras: for Theorem B the relations (5.4)–(5.6) are verified in detail only for $D_4$, with $E_6$, $E_7$, $E_8$ deferred as analogous, and for Theorem A the $c_{ij}>0$ case of Proposition 4.9 is omitted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • GIM algebras, previously realized only as fixed points of Kac–Moody algebras, become the integral Ringel–Hall Lie algebras of explicit 2-periodic triangulated categories.
  • The commutative diagram in Theorem 4.17 gives a categorical explanation of Berman's embedding: the map from $\operatorname{gim}(C)$ to its Kac–Moody cover factors through the Ringel–Hall Lie algebra of $\mathcal{D}/(\theta\circ\Sigma)$.
  • For the $D_4$, $E_6$, $E_7$, $E_8$ elliptic types, the surjective homomorphism $\Theta$ yields a candidate presentation of the integral Ringel–Hall Lie algebra by elliptic Serre relations; injectivity on real roots identifies real root spaces as one-dimensional.
  • The same orbit-category construction supplies new Hom-finite 2-periodic triangulated categories beyond root categories, including ones from algebras of global dimension 2, expanding the range of Peng–Xiao's Lie algebra construction.
  • If the conjecture that $\Theta$ is injective holds, the elliptic Lie algebras of these four types would be categorically realized.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The verification gap for the $c_{ij}>0$ relations in Proposition 4.9 suggests the cleanest test of Theorem A is a symmetrizable GIM with positive off-diagonal entries, where the claimed Serre relation $(\operatorname{ad}\tilde{u}_{S_i})^{c_{ij}+1}\tilde{u}_{S_{\bar{j}}}=0$ can be checked by direct Hall numbers.
  • The same quiver-with-involution construction may apply to other elliptic types such as $D_5^{(1,1)}$; Remark 5.9 suggests the naive quotient fails there, so the method likely needs an adapted quotient to handle non-homogeneous relations.
  • The explicit $D_4$ computation of imaginary root spaces hints that injectivity of $\Theta$ on imaginary roots may be approachable via the cohomology map $H^0(\pi_\rho)$ used in Lemma 3.6, by separating terms in the Hall expansion.
  • The involution $\theta$ plays a role analogous to the anti-involution in quantum symmetric pairs, so the construction may connect to $\imath$Hall algebras of weighted projective lines.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper introduces a categorical realization of symmetrizable GIM algebras. For a symmetrizable GIM matrix C with symmetrizer D, the authors construct an acyclic valued quiver Q with an involution θ, form the orbit category D/G with G = θ∘Σ, and apply Peng–Xiao's Ringel–Hall Lie algebra construction. Theorem 4.17 claims an isomorphism gim(C) ≅ L_C(D/G)⊗_Z C sending the Chevalley generators to explicit Hall generators, with injectivity obtained through a commutative diagram involving Berman's embedding of gim(C) into gcm(A(C)). In Section 5 the same framework is applied to the elliptic Lie algebras of types D4^(1,1), E6^(1,1), E7^(1,1), E8^(1,1) via quotient algebras; Theorem 5.7 claims a surjective homomorphism from each elliptic Lie algebra to the associated integral Ringel–Hall Lie algebra, injective on the Cartan subalgebra and on real root spaces.

Significance. If completed, Theorem A would give the first direct realization of arbitrary symmetrizable GIM algebras by Ringel–Hall Lie algebras in the Peng–Xiao sense, and Theorem B would provide a new Ringel–Hall model for the simply-laced elliptic Lie algebras. The construction is attractive: the valued quiver is explicit, Lemma 4.6 shows that the Euler form recovers DC, and the strategy of proving injectivity by transporting Berman's embedding through a commutative diagram is sound. The paper also contains a concrete computation for the first imaginary root space of D4^(1,1) in Example 5.8. However, several key Serre-relation checks are delegated rather than carried out; because these checks are exactly what makes the maps Ψ and Θ Lie algebra homomorphisms, the central claims are not yet fully verifiable as written.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.4, Proposition 4.9(2)] The proof of Proposition 4.9 explicitly verifies only the case c_ij ≤ 0 and then states that (4.11)–(4.12) can be verified in a similar way, without giving details. This is load-bearing: positive off-diagonal entries are precisely the GIM phenomenon that the paper adds beyond GCMs, and in that case the quiver has arrows i→bar j and bar i→j, so the relevant Hom/Ext spaces and the recursive claims (a)–(b) used for c_ij ≤ 0 do not formally apply. If (ad u_{S_i})^{c_ij+1}u_{S_bar j} has a nonzero u_L or Cartan contribution, the homomorphism Ψ in Theorem 4.17 would fail, and the commutative-diagram injectivity argument could not repair it. Please supply the missing verification or a reduction to the c_ij ≤ 0 computation.
  2. [§5.4, Lemmas 5.5–5.6] The verification of the elliptic Serre relations (5.4)–(5.6) is carried out only for D4^(1,1); for E6^(1,1), E7^(1,1) and E8^(1,1) the text says the cases can be handled in an analogous manner. This is load-bearing for Theorem 5.7 because the elliptic Cartan matrices have positive entries from double dotted edges and the projective resolutions (5.7)–(5.9) are type-specific. Well-definedness of Θ depends on (5.4)–(5.6) holding in g(M)_{(q-1)} for all four types. Please provide explicit resolutions and Hall-number checks for the three E-types, or a uniform proof covering them.
  3. [§3.2, Proposition 3.4] Proposition 3.4 asserts that the triangulated hull M_θ is Hom-finite and 2-periodic, and its proof is the single sentence "See [Fu12, Proposition 2.2]; the same argument applies." This is a foundational input for applying Peng–Xiao's construction and for both main theorems. The cited statement concerns root categories, and the transfer to orbit categories of algebras with involutions is not automatic; the paper should either give the proof or state precisely which general result from Fu12 applies and verify its hypotheses here.
  4. [§5.3, Lemma 5.2] Lemma 5.2, which identifies the Euler form on M with the elliptic Cartan matrix, is proved only for D4^(1,1), with the remaining three types treated as identical. Together with the gaps in Lemmas 5.5–5.6, this means the entire elliptic construction has been verified in detail for a single type. Since the bound quivers and the projective resolutions differ for E6^(1,1), E7^(1,1) and E8^(1,1), more evidence is needed before Theorem 5.7 can be regarded as established for all four cases.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.5, Theorem 5.7] The first sentence of Theorem 5.7 mentions only D4^(1,1) and E6^(1,1), although the abstract and the surrounding text include E7^(1,1) and E8^(1,1).
  2. [§5.4, Lemma 5.5] The notation "i≠j∈±I" is ambiguous; it should specify that the Serre relations are checked for all pairs of indices in I and for the corresponding barred pairs.
  3. [§5.4, proof of Lemma 5.5] In the proof, the phrase "(k_12,k_22)^t = a(k_11,k_21)^t for some a≠F" should read "for some a∈F," since the displayed contradiction requires a to be an element of the field.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typos, e.g., "vauled representation" and "represetation" in §4.3, and "subaglebra" in §4.4; these should be corrected in the final version.
  5. [Abstract and §5.5] The abstract says the map in the elliptic construction is "conjectured to be injective," while Theorem 5.7 establishes injectivity on real root spaces and the Cartan subalgebra; please clarify that the open injectivity question concerns imaginary root spaces.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GIM and elliptic realizations are derived from independent structural inputs, with only minor self-citations that are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central chain is: construct a valued quiver from (C,D), form D/(θ∘Σ), apply Peng–Xiao's construction, verify the Serre relations against the Hall Lie algebra, and compare with Berman's embedding. Each step is independent of the isomorphism being proved. Lemma 4.6 computes the Euler form of D/G directly from the quiver and obtains DC, and Theorem 4.17 then verifies the GIM relations in the Hall Lie algebra; this is a derivation, not a restatement of the target. The only author self-citations are Proposition 3.4, which refers to [Fu12, Proposition 2.2] for 2-periodicity of the triangulated hull and says 'the same argument applies', and Lemma 3.2, which cites [LR24, Theorem 2.12] for the fully faithful functor. Both are published general results about root or orbit categories, not about GIM algebras, and the paper supplies proofs or reductions for the adapted setting; they are not circular. The omitted details for c_ij > 0 in Proposition 4.9(2) and for E6, E7, E8 in Lemmas 5.5–5.6 are completeness gaps that affect correctness risk, but they are not instances of fitting, renaming, or importing the target conclusion, so they do not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted; the symmetrizer D is part of the input. The paper's new categorical constructions (orbit categories, triangulated hulls) are defined rather than postulated, and no physical or mathematical entities with independent falsifiable handles are introduced. The two ad hoc assumptions listed above are the main unproved premises.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Keller's Theorem 3.1: the orbit category D^b(A)/F admits a canonical triangulated structure under the two stated finiteness conditions.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 and used to make D/G triangulated in the hereditary case.
  • standard math Peng-Xiao Theorem 2.6 realizes symmetrizable Kac-Moody algebras as integral Ringel-Hall Lie algebras of root categories.
    Used in Section 2.5 and as the external benchmark in Theorem 4.17's injectivity argument.
  • standard math Berman's Theorem 4.2 embeds gim(C) into the fixed-point subalgebra of gcm(A(C)) under an involution.
    Used in Section 4.6 to prove injectivity of the surjective homomorphism Psi.
  • ad hoc to paper Proposition 3.4: the triangulated hull M_theta is Hom-finite and 2-periodic; the proof is cited to [Fu12] with 'the same argument applies' rather than carried out.
    The paper asserts the result for its non-hereditary algebras without proof; load-bearing for the elliptic section.
  • ad hoc to paper For each elliptic type, the quotient algebra A = FQ/I has global dimension 2 and the displayed projective resolutions (5.7)-(5.9) hold; only D4 is shown.
    Needed for Lemma 5.2 and the Serre relation verification; for E6, E7 and E8 this is asserted, not demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of GIM and Elliptic Lie algebras via Ringel--Hall Lie algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QTMUEAWN

@misc{pith2026260807877,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: GIM and Elliptic Lie algebras via Ringel--Hall Lie algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QTMUEAWN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07877}
}
abstract

For any symmetrizable generalized intersection matrix (GIM) $C$, we construct an acyclic valued quiver $(Q,\mathbf{d})$ endowed with an involution $\theta$. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be the bounded derived category of finite-dimensional representations of $(Q,\mathbf{d})$, and let $\Sigma$ stand for the suspension functor of $\mathcal{D}$. We show that the orbit category $\mathcal{D}/(\theta\circ\Sigma)$ carries a canonical triangulated structure and is $2$-periodic. Applying Peng--Xiao's construction to this orbit category, we prove that the GIM algebra $\operatorname{gim}(C)$ is isomorphic to the integral Ringel--Hall Lie algebra associated with $\mathcal{D}/(\theta\circ\Sigma)$. As a further application of the above machinery, we investigate elliptic Lie algebras of types $D_4^{(1,1)}$, $E_6^{(1,1)}$, $E_7^{(1,1)}$ and $E_8^{(1,1)}$. For each elliptic Dynkin diagram, we define a finite-dimensional algebra $A$ by taking an appropriate quotient of the acyclic quiver $Q$ attached to the GIM matrix $C$. From the resulting $2$-periodic triangulated categories, we build the corresponding Ringel--Hall Lie algebras, and establish a surjective Lie algebra homomorphism from each elliptic Lie algebra to its integral Ringel--Hall counterpart. This map is conjectured to be injective, and its injectivity on real root spaces is confirmed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07877 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The valued quiver associated with GIM C. quiver; see Example 5.1. 4.3. 2-periodic triangulated categories associated to (C, D). Recall that rep(Q) = repF (Q, d) is a hereditary abelian category. Denote by D := Db (rep(Q)) the bounded derived category of rep(Q) with suspension functor Σ. The involution θ on (Q, d) induces an exact additive functor on the category of repre￾sentations, θ : rep(Q) → rep(Q) (by abuse of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The elliptic Dynkin diagram of type D (1,1) 4 . 1 4 5 3 2 8 6 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The elliptic Dynkin diagram of type E (1,1) 6 . 1 3 4 5 2 9 6 7 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The elliptic Dynkin diagram of type E (1,1) 7 . 1 3 4 2 10 5 6 7 8 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The elliptic Dynkin diagram of type E (1,1) 8 . bilinear form ω : V × V −→ Q on V by ω(αi , αj ) =    2 if i = j, −1 if there is a solid edge between i and j, 2 if there is a double dotted edge between i and j, 0 otherwise. The matrix of the symmetric bilinear…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The bound quiver of D (1,1) 4 . 5.2. The quiver associated with X (1,1) l . For each elliptic Dynkin diagram X (1,1) l intro￾duced in Subsection 5.1, we construct an associated quiver Q := Q(X (1,1) l ) as follows: • The set of vertices is given by Q0 := I ∪ ¯I = {1, .…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Keller, Bernhard , TITLE =. Doc. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2005 , PAGES =

    2005

  2. [3]

    Keller, Bernhard , TITLE =. Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 1994 , NUMBER =

    work page 1994

  3. [4]

    Peng, Liangang and Xiao, Jie , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2000 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s002220000062 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s002220000062 2000

  4. [5]

    Derived category and Lie algebras

    Derived category and Lie algebras , author=. 2006 , JOURNAL =. math/0604565 , archivePrefix=

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  5. [6]

    Berman, Stephen , TITLE =. Comm. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 1989 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1080/00927878908823899 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1080/00927878908823899 1989

  6. [7]

    Ringel, Claus Michael , TITLE =. Adv. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1990 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/0001-8708(90)90043-M , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/0001-8708(90)90043-m 1990

  7. [8]

    Representation theory of algebras and related topics (

    Ringel, Claus Michael , TITLE =. Representation theory of algebras and related topics (. 1996 , ISBN =

    work page 1996

  8. [9]

    Duke Math

    Xiao, Jie and Xu, Fan , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/00127094-2008-021 , URL =

    doi:10.1215/00127094-2008-021 2008

Show all 43 references
  1. [10]

    Happel, Dieter , TITLE =. Comment. Math. Helv. , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF02564452 , URL =

    1987 doi

  2. [11]

    Peng, Liangang and Xiao, Jie , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1006/jabr.1997.7152 , URL =

    1997

  3. [12]

    Lie algebras and related topics (

    Slodowy, Peter , TITLE =. Lie algebras and related topics (. 1986 , ISBN =

    1986

  4. [13]

    Rupel, Dylan , TITLE =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , FJOURNAL =. 2011 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnq192 , URL =

    2011 doi

  5. [14]

    1990 , PAGES =

    Kac, Victor Gershevich , TITLE =. 1990 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511626234 , URL =

    1990 doi

  6. [15]

    Fu, Changjian , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.07.037 , URL =

    2012 doi

  7. [16]

    Buan, Aslak Bakke and Marsh, Robert and Reineke, Markus and Reiten, Idun and Todorov, Gordana , TITLE =. Adv. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2006 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2005.06.003 , URL =

    2006 doi

  8. [17]

    Saito, Kyoji , TITLE =. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 1985 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2977/prims/1195179841 , URL =

    1985

  9. [18]

    Saito, Kyoji and Yoshii, Daigo , TITLE =. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 2000 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2977/prims/1195142952 , URL =

    2000

  10. [19]

    Chen, Zhengxin and Lin, Yanan , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.10.008 , URL =

    2012 doi

  11. [20]

    Zhao, XiaoJuan , TITLE =. Sci. China Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s11425-014-4852-9 , URL =

    2014 doi

  12. [21]

    Manuscripta Math

    Gabriel, Peter , TITLE =. Manuscripta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1972 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/BF01298413 , URL =

    1972 doi

  13. [22]

    Kac, Victor Gershevich , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1980 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01403155 , URL =

    1980 doi

  14. [23]

    Invariant theory (

    Kac, Victor Gershevich , TITLE =. Invariant theory (. 1983 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/BFb0063236 , URL =

    1983 doi

  15. [24]

    Dlab, Vlastimil and Ringel, Claus Michael , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 1975 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/0021-8693(75)90125-8 , URL =

    1975 doi

  16. [25]

    Topics in algebra,

    Ringel, Claus Michael , TITLE =. Topics in algebra,. 1990 , ISBN =

    1990

  17. [26]

    Representations of algebras and related topics (

    Ringel, Claus Michael , TITLE =. Representations of algebras and related topics (. 1992 , ISBN =

    1992

  18. [27]

    Green, James Alexander , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1995 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01241133 , URL =

    1995 doi

  19. [28]

    Riedtmann, Christine , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 1994 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1006/jabr.1994.1351 , URL =

    1994

  20. [29]

    Lusztig, George , TITLE =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1990 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1990961 , URL =

    1990 doi

  21. [30]

    Lusztig, George , TITLE =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1991 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/2939279 , URL =

    1991 doi

  22. [31]

    Duke Math

    Kashiwara, Masaki , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 1993 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-93-06920-7 , URL =

    1993 doi

  23. [32]

    Fu, Changjian and Yang, Dong , TITLE =. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/jlms/jdr064 , URL =

    2012 doi

  24. [33]

    Saito, Kyoji , TITLE =. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 1990 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2977/prims/1195171662 , URL =

    1990

  25. [34]

    Saito, Kyoji and Takebayashi, Tadayoshi , TITLE =. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2977/prims/1195145453 , URL =

    1997

  26. [35]

    Yamane, Hiroyuki , title =. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , issn =. 2004 , language =. doi:10.2977/prims/1145475810 , keywords =

    2004

  27. [36]

    Moody, Robert Vaughan and Eswara Rao, Senapathi and Yokonuma, Takeo , title =. Geom. Dedicata , issn =. 1990 , language =. doi:10.1007/BF00147350 , keywords =

    1990 doi

  28. [37]

    1997 , publisher =

    Allison, Bruce Norman and Azam, Saeid and Berman, Stephen and Gao, Yun and Pianzola, Arturo , title =. 1997 , publisher =. doi:10.1090/memo/0603 , keywords =

    1997 doi

  29. [38]

    Representations of algebras

    Peng, Liangang , title =. Representations of algebras. Vol. I, II. Proceedings of the 9th international conference, Beijing, China, August 21--September 1, 2000. , isbn =. 2002 , publisher =

    2000

  30. [39]

    Lin, Yanan and Peng, Liangang , title =. Adv. Math. , issn =. 2005 , language =. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2004.09.006 , keywords =

    2005 doi

  31. [40]

    1988 , PAGES =

    Happel, Dieter , TITLE =. 1988 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511629228 , URL =

    1988 doi

  32. [41]

    Stai, Torkil , TITLE =. Math. Res. Lett. , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/mrl.2018.v25.n1.a9 , URL =

    2018 doi

  33. [42]

    arXiv: 2411.13078 , eprint=

    Ming Lu and Shiquan Ruan , year=. arXiv: 2411.13078 , eprint=

    arXiv

  34. [43]

    Fu, Changjian and Peng, Liangang , TITLE =. Math. Z. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00209-014-1331-5 , URL =

    2014 doi

  35. [44]

    Algebra Colloq

    Fang, Yingjue and Peng, Liangang , TITLE =. Algebra Colloq. , FJOURNAL =. 2010 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1142/S1005386710000374 , URL =

    2010 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.