Metastability limit of pristine 2D noble metals with high-energy facet: dominance of the Bell-Evans-Polanyi principle

Xiaoliang Zhong

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 18 references

Metastability limit of pristine 2D noble metals with high-energy facet: dominance of the Bell-Evans-Polanyi principle

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Bell-Evans-Polanyi principle, expressed as a straight-line relation between transformation barrier and surface-energy gain, fixes the critical thickness below which ultrathin (110) noble-metal nanosheets spontaneously transform to…

desk verdict A clean two-line formula for thickness-dependent transformation barriers in 2D noble metals, but the paper's own Rh results contradict the predicted critical thickness. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07884 v1 pith:ZUIEHLF3 submitted 2026-08-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Xiaoliang Zhong This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords two-dimensionalnoblemetalshigh-energyfacetsBell-Evans-Polanyiprinciplestructuraltransformationcriticalthicknessdensityfunctionaltheorynanosheetstabilitymetastability

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using density functional theory, this paper predicts that freestanding (110) nanosheets of Rh, Pd, Ag, and Ir transform into (100) nanosheets through a b-direction lattice contraction, and that the energy barrier for this transformation falls linearly as the sheet gets thinner. The paper identifies this as a Bell–Evans–Polanyi (BEP) relationship: the barrier plays the role of activation energy, and the surface-energy difference between the (110) and (100) facets plays the role of reaction enthalpy. From that analogy it derives a formula for the critical thickness at which the barrier vanishes, giving approximately 7–8 monolayers for Pd and about 5–6 monolayers for Ag, while Rh keeps a finite barrier down to 2 monolayers. If correct, the result turns the synthesis limit of high-energy-facet 2D metals into a quantity that can be estimated from bulk energy curves and facet surface energies alone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the straight-line approximation of the bulk energy curve along the lattice parameter $b$. During the (110)-to-(100) transformation, $b$ shrinks from $\sqrt{2}a$ to $a$ while the other in-plane lattice parameter stays fixed. The paper fits the energy of the bulk region to two lines, $y_1=m_1 x+b_1$ and $y_2=m_2 x+b_2$, whose intersection gives the bulk barrier $E_b$. For a sheet of $n$ monolayers, the product-side line is lowered by $2\Delta E_S/n$ because the two surfaces gain $\Delta E_S$ per surface atom; intersecting the shifted line with the reactant line gives Eq. (5), and setting the barrier to zero gives the critical-thickness formula. Everything follows from this BEP ansatz.

What would settle it

Compute the full energy profile of a 6-monolayer Pd (110) sheet along the b lattice parameter with the same DFT settings: the paper predicts a vanishing barrier, so finding an energy barrier larger than the thermal energy at synthesis conditions (or a barrier that does not go to zero at the predicted 7–8 ML critical thickness) would falsify the BEP-dominated description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the metastability limit of pristine (110)-faceted noble-metal nanosheets is governed by the Bell–Evans–Polanyi principle, not by a more complex thickness-dependent mechanism. Concretely, the DFT-computed transformation barrier $E_b'$ follows $E_b' = E_b - \frac{2 m_1}{m_1-m_2}\frac{\Delta E_S}{n}$, where $E_b$ is the bulk transformation barrier, $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the slopes of the bulk energy versus lattice parameter $b$ on the reactant and product sides, $\Delta E_S$ is the per-surface-atom surface-energy difference between the (110) and (100) facets, and $n$ is the sheet thickness in monolayers. The paper shows that for Rh, Pd, and Ag the barriers computed from full DFT relaxation agree with this linear expression, and that setting $E_b'=0$ yields critical thicknesses ($n^* = \frac{2 m_1}{m_1-m_2}\frac{\Delta E_S}{E_b}$) close to the values found by direct geometry optimization: 7.8 versus 7 ML for Pd, and 6.5 versus 5 ML for Ag. The authors therefore extend the BEP principle from reaction kinetics to the structural stability of low-dimensional materials.

Load-bearing premise

The formula assumes that the bulk energy along the contraction path is two straight lines with constant slopes and that the surface-energy gain between the (110) and (100) facets stays constant for every thickness; platinum, with its local energy minimum, already shows where this linearity can break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For palladium, (110) nanosheets thinner than roughly 7 monolayers are not metastable: they relax spontaneously to (100) facets, so synthesis below that thickness should not yield the high-energy facet.
For silver the corresponding limit is near 5 monolayers, while rhodium sheets preserve the (110) facet down to at least 2 monolayers because of its larger bulk barrier.
The barrier of a (110) sheet decreases linearly with inverse thickness, which means the dominant destabilizing effect is the growing share of the surface-energy gain, not a change in the transformation mechanism.
For sufficiently thick sheets the barrier converges to the bulk value, so the same formula can be used to decide when surface effects can be ignored in computational studies.
The BEP relation provides a shortcut: critical thickness can be predicted from the bulk energy profile and the (110)/(100) surface-energy difference without running a full thickness-by-thickness DFT scan.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One testable extension is that adsorbates or substrates, by changing the effective $\Delta E_S$, should shift the critical thickness linearly; a monolayer that lowers the (110) surface energy could stabilize sheets that are otherwise too thin to exist.
The same BEP derivation should apply to other facet pairs, such as (001)-to-(111) transitions in fcc metals, provided the bulk energy along the relevant lattice coordinate is approximately two-line; a systematic failure there would map where the straight-line assumption breaks.
If the relation holds beyond the four metals studied, the critical thickness of any fcc metal nanosheet can be screened from bulk equation-of-state data and ideal-facet surface energies, making the synthesis limit a bulk property plus a surface term.
Platinum and gold are the paper's own exception: their bulk energy curves show a local minimum or a surface-energy maximum, so the two-line model would predict a non-monotonic barrier or a residual barrier even at monolayer thickness; that is a place where the BEP description should be tested rather than assumed.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper does something genuinely new—it adapts the Bell–Evans–Polanyi idea to thickness-dependent barriers in freestanding (110) metal nanosheets and writes down an explicit formula (Eq. 5) plus a critical-thickness expression (Eq. 6). The comparison with direct DFT barriers for Pd and Ag is plausible, and the notion of a BEP-dominated stability limit is worth testing. But the central claim is undermined by an internal contradiction with the paper's own data, and the analysis misses one of the four metals named in the abstract.

What is actually good: the derivation is transparent, the parameters are tabulated, and the predicted thickness scaling is a clean testable hypothesis. For Pd and Ag, the derived critical thicknesses (7.8 and 6.5 ML) bracket the DFT-optimized values (7 and 5 ML) reasonably. The paper also correctly notes that Pt has a local minimum in the bulk energy curve, which breaks the straight-line assumption; that is a fair caveat.

Where it falls apart: the stress-test is on target. Using Table 1 for Rh (m1 = -0.427, m2 = 0.414, Eb = 0.234 eV/atom, ΔES = 0.546 eV/surface atom), Eq. 6 gives n* = 2.37 ML. The paper explicitly states that Rh (110) sheets retain their facet down to 2 ML after relaxation. So the model predicts a 2 ML Rh sheet should transform spontaneously, but the DFT relaxation says it does not. That is not a minor discrepancy—it is a direct counterexample to the claim that critical thicknesses are described by the BEP principle. The paper mentions this mismatch but then concludes the principle dominates anyway, which does not follow. Also, the abstract includes Ir, but Table 1 and the derived-thickness discussion cover only Rh, Pd, and Ag. Ir's absence is a gap for a paper claiming four metals.

The straight-line energy approximation is a further limitation, but the Rh contradiction is the load-bearing issue. A referee could reasonably ask whether the BEP fit is just an interpolation of the thickness range where the barrier is positive, with no predictive power at the point where it should vanish.

Who this is for: researchers working on metastable 2D metals or facet-dependent stability, especially those interested in cheap estimates of synthesis limits. The idea is worth knowing, but the current version overclaims. It deserves a serious referee, but not acceptance without major revision and a direct reconciliation of the Rh result.

Recommendation: send to peer review, but make clear that the Rh contradiction must be addressed, and Ir should be either included or removed from the abstract.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses DFT to study the thickness-dependent transformation of freestanding (110)-faceted noble-metal nanosheets (Rh, Pd, Ag, Ir, Pt, Au) into (100)-faceted sheets. It proposes a Bell-Evans-Polanyi (BEP)-type relation, Eq. (5), in which the nanosheet transformation barrier decreases linearly with the surface-energy difference ΔE_S divided by thickness, and a critical thickness n*, Eq. (6), below which the (110) sheet is predicted to transform spontaneously. The authors claim that this relation is confirmed by their calculated barriers for Rh and Pd and that the critical thicknesses of Rh, Pd, and Ag are described by the BEP principle.

Significance. If correct, the proposed BEP relation would provide a simple, physically transparent criterion for the metastability limit of high-energy-facet 2D metals, and the paper contributes a useful DFT dataset of nanosheet transformation barriers. The explicit formula in Eq. (5) and the approximate agreement for Pd (7.8 vs 7 ML) and Ag (6.5 vs 5 ML) are of interest. However, the central claim is currently overbroad and is contradicted by the paper's own Rh data, which show a finite barrier at 2 ML despite a predicted critical thickness of 2.4 ML. The paper's value would be substantially strengthened if the claims were restricted to the metals for which the relation is actually supported.

major comments (3)

[Eq. (6) and Table 1] Equation (6) with the Table 1 parameters for Rh (m1=-0.427, m2=0.414, E_b=0.234 eV/atom, ΔE_S=0.546 eV/surface atom) gives n*=2.37 ML. Substituting n=2 ML into Eq. (5) yields E_b'=-0.043 eV/atom, i.e., the model predicts that a 2 ML Rh (110) sheet is below the critical thickness and should transform spontaneously. This directly contradicts the DFT result reported in Fig. 1(c) and the text, which state that Rh (110) sheets remain stable down to 2 ML with a finite barrier. Because Rh is one of the four metals named in the abstract, this internal contradiction invalidates the abstract's claim that the critical thicknesses of these metals are described by the BEP principle.
[Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract states that 'the critical thicknesses for these metals are also described by the BEP principle,' referring to Rh, Pd, Ag, and Ir, but the conclusion restricts this statement to Pd and Ag ('the critical thicknesses of Pd and Ag with vanishing energy barriers'). No critical thickness or BEP prediction is reported for Ir, and for Rh the prediction contradicts the DFT result as noted above. Additionally, for Ag the predicted n*=6.5 ML differs from the observed 5 ML by 30%, so even for the favorable metals the agreement is only qualitative. The central claim needs to be restricted to the metals for which it holds, and the quantitative discrepancies need to be addressed.
[Eqs. (1)-(5) and Fig. 2] The derivation of Eq. (5) is built on two assumptions: the bulk energy curves are linear (Eqs. (1)-(2), Fig. 3(e)) and the surface-energy difference ΔE_S is constant along the transformation coordinate. Fig. 2(b)-(e) show that these functions are curved and that the surface-energy difference is b-dependent, and the authors themselves note a local minimum in the Pt bulk curve (Fig. 2(c)). The paper does not quantify how well the straight-line approximation represents the actual curves, and the visual agreement in Fig. 3(g)-(h) is not a substitute for a fit-quality metric. The validity range of the BEP approximation should be stated explicitly.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 3 caption] The text 'In Fig. 3 (g) and (h) we plot the calculated energy barriers (Fig. 2 d-f) versus the derived ones' cross-references Fig. 2(d)-(f), which are surface-energy curves, not barriers; this should be corrected to reference Fig. 3(c)-(d). The caption labels (c) and (d) also appear to be swapped relative to the text's description of Fig. 3(e) and (f).
[Derivation of Eq. (4)] The units of the term 2ΔE_S/n should be spelled out: ΔE_S is per surface atom, and since each sheet has two surfaces and n atomic layers, the factor 2/n converts the energy to eV/atom. A brief explanation of this conversion would improve the derivation.
[Typographical errors] The text contains 'This in consistent with a previous DFT study' which should read 'This is consistent with a previous DFT study', and the conclusion uses 'dominate role' where 'dominant role' is intended.
[Table 1] Table 1 would be more complete if it stated the units of m1, m2, b1, and b2, and if it included parameters for Ir or an explanation of their absence, given that Ir is named in the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BEP formula is a fitted model tested against independent DFT nanosheet barriers.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins with a straight-line approximation of bulk energy curves (Eqs. 1-2), from which the barrier formula Eb' = Eb - (2m1/(m1-m2))ΔES/n (Eq. 5) and critical thickness n* = (2m1/(m1-m2))ΔES/Eb (Eq. 6) follow algebraically. The parameters m1, m2, Eb, and ΔES are fitted to bulk and surface DFT data, but the paper then compares the resulting Eb' and n* against independently calculated nanosheet energy barriers and full geometry optimizations (Fig. 3(g)-(h), Fig. 1(c), and the reported critical thicknesses for Pd and Ag). This is a genuine model-to-data comparison, not a tautology. There are no load-bearing self-citations, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. The Pt local minimum and the apparent disagreement for Rh (derived n*=2.4 ML versus the reported stability of 2 ML (110) Rh sheets) are substantive correctness concerns about the straight-line approximation, but they do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the straight-line approximation of bulk energy curves and the assumption of a constant surface energy difference. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)

m1, m2, b1, b2 for Rh = -0.427, 0.414, 1.621, -1.111
Fitted to the bulk energy variation along lattice parameter b (Fig. 2b-c) using two straight lines (Eqs. 1-2).
m1, m2, b1, b2 for Pd = -0.072, 0.098, 0.280, -0.269
Fitted to the bulk energy variation along lattice parameter b (Fig. 2b-c) using two straight lines (Eqs. 1-2).
m1, m2, b1, b2 for Ag = -0.042, 0.074, 0.173, -0.211
Fitted to the bulk energy variation along lattice parameter b (Fig. 2b-c) using two straight lines (Eqs. 1-2).

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The bulk energy variation along lattice parameter b is approximated by two straight lines (Eqs. 1-2).
This is the core modeling assumption enabling the BEP formula (introduced around Fig. 3e).
domain assumption The surface energy difference between (110) and (100) facets is constant during the transformation (Eq. 4).
Fig. 2d-e shows surface energies varying with b, but the derivation uses a fixed dE_S.
domain assumption The BEP principle applies to nanosheet transformations as a linear barrier-reaction energy relation.
The paper postulates this analogy rather than deriving it from microscopic theory.
domain assumption Standard DFT with PAW pseudopotentials and a 400 eV cutoff is accurate for these energies.
Exchange-correlation errors are not quantified; the computational details are standard.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metastability limit of pristine 2D noble metals with high-energy facet: dominance of the Bell-Evans-Polanyi principle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZUIEHLF3

@misc{pith2026260807884,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metastability limit of pristine 2D noble metals with high-energy facet: dominance of the Bell-Evans-Polanyi principle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZUIEHLF3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07884}
}

read the original abstract

Using density functional theory, we predict that ultrathin (110) sheets of Rh, Pd, Ag, and Ir tend to transform into their (100) counterparts via lattice contraction. An approximately linear relationship between the transformation barrier and the energy difference between (110) and (100) sheets is revealed, demonstrating that the Bell-Evans-Polanyi (BEP) principle dominates. Furthermore, the critical thicknesses for these metals are also described by the BEP principle: below these thicknesses, the (110) sheets are no longer metastable and undergo spontaneous structural transformation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07884 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

[1]

-G., Nanomaterials of high surface energy with exceptional properties in catalysis and energy storage

Zhou, Z.-Y .; Tian, N.; Li, J.-T.; Broadwell, I.; Sun, S. -G., Nanomaterials of high surface energy with exceptional properties in catalysis and energy storage. Chemical Society Reviews 2011, 40 (7), 4167- 4185

work page 2011
[2]

Accounts of Chemical Research 2013, 46 (2), 191-202

Quan, Z.; Wang, Y .; Fang, J., High-Index Faceted Noble Metal Nanocrystals. Accounts of Chemical Research 2013, 46 (2), 191-202

work page 2013
[3]

Joule 2020, 4 (12), 2562-2598

Xiao, C.; Lu, B.-A.; Xue, P .; Tian, N.; Zhou, Z.-Y .; Lin, X.; Lin, W.-F.; Sun, S.-G., High-Index-Facet- and High-Surface-Energy Nanocrystals of Metals and Metal Oxides as Highly Efficient Catalysts. Joule 2020, 4 (12), 2562-2598

work page 2020
[4]

Small 2024, 20 (36), 2401546

Wang, R.; Lee, J.-M., High-Energy Facet Engineering for Electrocatalytic Applications. Small 2024, 20 (36), 2401546

work page 2024
[5]

Physical Review Letters 1999, 82 (4), 751-754

Kondo, Y .; Ru, Q.; Takayanagi, K., Thickness Induced Structural Phase Transition of Gold Nanofilm. Physical Review Letters 1999, 82 (4), 751-754

work page 1999
[6]

Physical Review Letters 2002, 88 (9), 096103

Hasmy, A.; Medina, E., Thickness Induced Structural Transition in Suspended fcc Metal Nanofilms. Physical Review Letters 2002, 88 (9), 096103

work page 2002
[7]

L.; Boey, F.; Mirkin, C

Huang, X.; Li, S.; Huang, Y .; Wu, S.; Zhou, X.; Li, S.; Gan, C. L.; Boey, F.; Mirkin, C. A.; Zhang, H., Synthesis of hexagonal close-packed gold nanostructures. Nature Communications 2011, 2 (1), 292

work page 2011
[8]

Physical Review 1964, 136 (3B), B864-B871

Hohenberg, P .; Kohn, W., Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Physical Review 1964, 136 (3B), B864-B871

work page 1964

Show all 18 references

[9]

J., Self -Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects

Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J., Self -Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Physical Review 1965, 140 (4A), A1133-A1138

1965
[10]

Chemical Science 2018, 9 (19), 4451-4455

Xu, D.; Liu, X.; Lv, H.; Liu, Y .; Zhao, S.; Han, M.; Bao, J.; He, J.; Liu, B., Ultrathin palladium nanosheets with selectively controlled surface facets. Chemical Science 2018, 9 (19), 4451-4455

2018
[11]

W., {110}-Terminated Square-Shaped Gold Nanoplates and Their Electrochemical Surface Reactivity

Chen, Y .; Milenkovic, S.; Hassel, A. W., {110}-Terminated Square-Shaped Gold Nanoplates and Their Electrochemical Surface Reactivity. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4 (3), 557-564

2017
[12]

Z.; Zhang, N.; Guo, S

Bu, L. Z.; Zhang, N.; Guo, S. J.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Yao, J. L.; Wu, T.; Lu, G.; Ma, J. Y .; Su, D.; Huang, X. Q., Biaxially strained PtPb/Pt core/shell nanoplate boosts oxygen reduction catalysis. Science 2016, 354 (6318), 1410-1414

2016
[13]

Small 2022, 18 (33), 2202587

Zhang, G.; Cao, D.; Guo, S.; Fang, Y .; Wang, Q.; Cheng, S.; Zuo, W.; Yang, Z.; Cui, P ., Tuning the Selective Ethanol Oxidation on Tensile-Trained Pt(110) Surface by Ir Single Atoms. Small 2022, 18 (33), 2202587

2022
[14]

Science 2019, 363 (6429), 870-874

Wang, L.; Zeng, Z.; Gao, W.; Maxson, T.; Raciti, D.; Giroux, M.; Pan, X.; Wang, C.; Greeley, J., Tunable intrinsic strain in two-dimensional transition metal electrocatalysts. Science 2019, 363 (6429), 870-874

2019
[15]

H., Broken-bond rule for the surface energies of noble metals

Galanakis, I.; Bihlmayer, G.; Bellini, V.; Papanikolaou, N.; Zeller, R.; Blügel, S.; Dederichs, P . H., Broken-bond rule for the surface energies of noble metals. Europhysics Letters 2002, 58 (5), 751

2002
[16]

Materials Today Advances 2020, 8, 100092

Wang, T.; Park, M.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y ., Stability and synthesis of 2D metals and alloys: a review. Materials Today Advances 2020, 8, 100092

2020
[17]

D.; Hughes, R

Neal, R. D.; Hughes, R. A.; Preston, A. S.; Golze, S. D.; Demille, T. B.; Neretina, S., Substrate - immobilized noble metal nanoplates: a review of their synthesis, assembly, and application. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2021, 9 (38), 12974-13012

2021
[18]

I.; Gall, K., Density functional theory investigation of surface -stress-induced phase transformations in fcc metal nanowires

Haftel, M. I.; Gall, K., Density functional theory investigation of surface -stress-induced phase transformations in fcc metal nanowires. Physical Review B 2006, 74 (3), 035420

2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

-G., Nanomaterials of high surface energy with exceptional properties in catalysis and energy storage

Zhou, Z.-Y .; Tian, N.; Li, J.-T.; Broadwell, I.; Sun, S. -G., Nanomaterials of high surface energy with exceptional properties in catalysis and energy storage. Chemical Society Reviews 2011, 40 (7), 4167- 4185

work page 2011

[2] [2]

Accounts of Chemical Research 2013, 46 (2), 191-202

Quan, Z.; Wang, Y .; Fang, J., High-Index Faceted Noble Metal Nanocrystals. Accounts of Chemical Research 2013, 46 (2), 191-202

work page 2013

[3] [3]

Joule 2020, 4 (12), 2562-2598

Xiao, C.; Lu, B.-A.; Xue, P .; Tian, N.; Zhou, Z.-Y .; Lin, X.; Lin, W.-F.; Sun, S.-G., High-Index-Facet- and High-Surface-Energy Nanocrystals of Metals and Metal Oxides as Highly Efficient Catalysts. Joule 2020, 4 (12), 2562-2598

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Small 2024, 20 (36), 2401546

Wang, R.; Lee, J.-M., High-Energy Facet Engineering for Electrocatalytic Applications. Small 2024, 20 (36), 2401546

work page 2024

[5] [5]

Physical Review Letters 1999, 82 (4), 751-754

Kondo, Y .; Ru, Q.; Takayanagi, K., Thickness Induced Structural Phase Transition of Gold Nanofilm. Physical Review Letters 1999, 82 (4), 751-754

work page 1999

[6] [6]

Physical Review Letters 2002, 88 (9), 096103

Hasmy, A.; Medina, E., Thickness Induced Structural Transition in Suspended fcc Metal Nanofilms. Physical Review Letters 2002, 88 (9), 096103

work page 2002

[7] [7]

L.; Boey, F.; Mirkin, C

Huang, X.; Li, S.; Huang, Y .; Wu, S.; Zhou, X.; Li, S.; Gan, C. L.; Boey, F.; Mirkin, C. A.; Zhang, H., Synthesis of hexagonal close-packed gold nanostructures. Nature Communications 2011, 2 (1), 292

work page 2011

[8] [8]

Physical Review 1964, 136 (3B), B864-B871

Hohenberg, P .; Kohn, W., Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Physical Review 1964, 136 (3B), B864-B871

work page 1964