Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 27 references

Conformal-Mapping Method for Horizon Multipoles in Numerical Relativity: Implementation, Kerr Validation, and Applications Beyond Axisymmetry

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper presents the first numerical implementation of the conformal-mapping method, computing black-hole horizon multipole moments without assuming axisymmetry, and demonstrates it on a binary black-hole merger.

desk verdict First solid numerical implementation of the conformal horizon multipole framework, with genuine Kerr validation; the beyond-axisymmetry evidence is real but thinner than the abstract implies, so it deserves review with a request for convergence data. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07985 v1 pith:EQDFFCEZ submitted 2026-08-08 gr-qc

Yeong-Bok Bae , Young-Hwan Hyun , Gungwon Kang This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C3583-08 PACS 04.25.dg04.70.-s04.30.-w
keywords conformal-mappingmethodhorizonmultipolesnumericalrelativitydiscreteRicciflowspectralembeddingbinaryblackholemergerKerrnon-axisymmetrichorizons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Horizon multipole moments have traditionally required a preferred axis of symmetry on the black-hole horizon. This paper presents a numerical method, the conformal-mapping method (CMM), that removes that requirement: it constructs a canonical unit round metric conformally equivalent to the horizon's intrinsic metric, then computes multipole moments in the associated spherical-harmonic basis. The authors implement the construction through discrete Ricci flow, spectral embedding onto a sphere, and a Möbius gauge-fixing condition, validate it against analytic Kerr solutions, and apply it to an equal-mass, non-spinning binary black-hole merger. If correct, the method makes horizon multipoles available in generic dynamical settings, including the strong-field merger regime, in a fixed reference frame not tied to any approximate symmetry.

What carries the argument

The central object is the canonical unit round metric in the conformal class of the horizon's intrinsic 2-metric. The machine that produces it has three stages: discrete Ricci flow, which rescales the edge lengths of a triangulated horizon mesh until the vertex angle deficits are distributed in proportion to vertex areas, solving the discrete version of $D^2\ln\psi+\psi^2=R/2$; spectral embedding, which uses the three lowest eigenvectors of the discrete Laplacian as Cartesian coordinates on the unit round sphere; and Möbius gauge fixing by the vanishing-area-dipole condition $\int_S \bar{Y}_{1m}\,d^2V=0$, which selects the unique conformal round frame up to an overall rotation. This round metric and its spherical harmonics provide the geometric coordinates in which the multipole integrals are evaluated.

What would settle it

Take a Kerr horizon with spin $a/M=0.9$, refine the triangulation and Ricci-flow tolerance, and verify that the computed conformal factor and quadrupole moments approach the known analytic benchmark monotonically; a non-converging or discontinuous result would show the method can fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the conformal-mapping method is a working numerical realization of the symmetry-free conformal construction of horizon multipoles. Instead of finding an approximate rotation axis, the method solves for the unit round metric $\bar{q}_{ab}=\psi^2 q_{ab}$ in the conformal class of the physical horizon metric $q_{ab}$, with the conformal factor determined by the nonlinear elliptic equation $D^2\ln\psi + \psi^2 = R/2$ and the Möbius freedom fixed by requiring the area dipole $\int_S \bar{Y}_{1m}\,d^2V$ to vanish. The numerical pipeline uses discrete Ricci flow on a triangulation, spectral embedding of the resulting round surface onto the unit sphere, and an external convention for the final SO(3) orientation. On Kerr horizons the method reproduces the analytic conformal factor, the conformal latitude map, and the conformal multipole moments; in the binary merger it yields a fixed-frame quadrupole mode $I_{22}$ whose amplitude grows during inspiral and decays after merger, qualitatively tracking the gravitational-wave inspiral–merger–ringdown pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the computer pipeline reliably finds the one round sphere shape that the horizon's geometry can be stretched into, and that the spherical coordinate grid it produces is the right one; agreement with Kerr is shown visually, but no error or convergence study is reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Horizon multipole moments can be computed in the merger regime where no stable symmetry axis exists, extending the notion of horizon multipoles to generic dynamical horizons.
  • Because the conformal frame is fixed by an external convention, horizon multipole modes can be expressed in the same frame used for gravitational-wave decomposition, enabling direct waveform-horizon comparisons.
  • In an equal-mass, non-spinning binary, the $I_{22}$ conformal mode grows during inspiral and decays after merger, showing a qualitative ringdown pattern analogous to the gravitational-wave signal.
  • The conformal and axisymmetric definitions disagree even for Kerr horizons, so the choice of multipole definition changes the numerical values assigned to a given horizon.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to apply the CMM to spinning or unequal-mass binaries, where spin-induced and tidal axes are misaligned; the externally fixed conformal frame should separate these contributions cleanly.
  • The symmetric trace-free quadrupole built from the $\ell=2$ sector could serve as an a posteriori principal-axis finder, locating the dominant deformation direction even when the horizon has no symmetry.
  • A dedicated convergence study varying mesh resolution and Ricci-flow tolerance would quantify the method's accuracy on realistic horizon data.
  • The smooth transition of $I_{22}$ across common-horizon formation hints that individual-horizon quadrupole content is carried into the remnant, opening a mode-by-mode comparison with ringdown radiation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents the conformal-mapping method (CMM), a numerical implementation of the symmetry-free horizon multipole construction proposed by Ashtekar, Khera, Kolanowski, and Lewandowski. The pipeline combines discrete Ricci flow, spectral embedding onto the unit sphere, and Möbius gauge fixing by the vanishing-area-dipole condition. The authors validate the method against analytic Kerr horizons, including reconstruction of the conformal map, and then apply it to an equal-mass, non-spinning binary black-hole merger, comparing the resulting multipoles with those from the approximate Killing vector (AKV) method. The central claims are that CMM provides geometrically defined horizon multipoles without assuming axisymmetry and that, unlike symmetry-adapted frames, the conformal frame can be kept fixed externally across inspiral, merger, and ringdown.

Significance. If the numerical implementation is reliable, the paper delivers the first working realization of the conformal horizon-multipole framework, which is a conceptually important step beyond axisymmetric methods. The Kerr validation, which checks the conformal factor and coordinate map rather than only the final multipole integrals, is a strength, as is the comparison with an independent symmetry-based method. The binary application, while preliminary, illustrates a genuinely useful feature of the method: multipoles can be expressed in a fixed external frame, avoiding the abrupt axis reorientation that affects symmetry-adapted diagnostics. The main weakness is the absence of quantitative convergence and residual information, which currently leaves the numerical reliability of the pipeline insufficiently supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Figs. 1–3] The Kerr validation is presented only through visual agreement of dots with dashed or solid curves; no residuals, error bars, or convergence measures are reported. Phrases such as 'agree with the analytic Kerr benchmarks' and 'fall on their respective analytic benchmarks' are not quantitative. Because the paper's central claim is that the pipeline computes the conformal map and multipoles correctly, the authors should provide a numerical measure of accuracy (e.g., L2 or maximum error in λ, θ_CMM, and M_n) and a convergence study with respect to mesh refinement (triangulation density and/or horizon angular grid resolution). Without this, the validation cannot distinguish a correct implementation from one that is merely close at the plotted resolution.
  2. [Section IV, Figs. 5 and 6] The 'beyond axisymmetry' claim rests entirely on the binary application, but the binary horizons are only mildly non-axisymmetric and there is no independent cross-check or ground truth. The qualitative inspiral–merger–ringdown behavior of I22 could in principle be dominated by systematic errors from the Ricci flow, spectral embedding, or Möbius gauge fixing. The authors should add at least one of the following: (a) a convergence test in horizon grid resolution for the binary runs, (b) a time series of the residual of the vanishing-area-dipole condition, (c) a validation against a known non-axisymmetric horizon geometry (e.g., a Kerr horizon with a small multipolar perturbation or a Bowen–York puncture with known horizon multipoles), or (d) an internal consistency test such as the transformation properties of the multipoles under a known rotation of the external frame. As written, the binary section is a demonstration of the method, not a validation of the symmetry-free regime.
  3. [Section II B, Parts (i) and (ii)] The numerical pipeline is not described in sufficient detail for reproducibility or for assessing convergence. In particular, the paper does not specify the triangulation construction (number of vertices, refinement strategy), the discrete Ricci flow discretization or stopping criterion, the definition of the discrete Laplacian used for spectral embedding, the criterion for selecting and orienting the three lowest eigenvectors, or the numerical tolerance with which the vanishing-area-dipole condition of Eq. (16) is enforced. These are load-bearing components of the method, since the claim that the pipeline realizes the conformal construction depends on the discrete flow converging to the solution of Eq. (14) and on the gauge fixing being accurate. The authors should provide a precise algorithmic description with parameter values, or at least state the resolution and tolerance used in all reported runs.
  4. [Equations (34)–(35)] The 'corrected conformal map' Z(u) is used as the analytic benchmark for the numerical validation, but its derivation is not included in this paper, and the correction relative to Ref. [14] is not specified. The statement that the Kerr expressions 'were part of the analytic groundwork' is not enough for the reader to verify the benchmark. Since the validation is only as trustworthy as the analytic formula, the authors should either provide the derivation of Eq. (34) in an appendix or explicitly state that the formula is taken from Ref. [16] and quote the relevant equation. This is also needed to clarify the relationship between the present paper and the concurrent analytic work of Ref. [16].
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section I] The abstract and the introduction contain the word 'Möbius' rendered with a LaTeX accent artifact ('M¨ obius'); the final PDF should be checked for proper typesetting.
  2. [Section II A, around Eq. (16)] The paper explains that the vanishing-area-dipole condition fixes the Möbius freedom up to an SO(3) rotation, but it would be helpful to state explicitly that the residual freedom is exactly the three-dimensional rotation group and not a larger group; this is implied by the text but should be stated as a reference for later use.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 3] In the figure legend, 'axi (analytic)' and 'conf (analytic)' are used, while the text refers to 'dashed curves for the axisymmetric construction' and 'solid curves for the conformal construction'; the legend should be made self-explanatory, especially since the paper is read by numerical relativists who may not be familiar with the color conventions.
  4. [Section V, discussion of AKV-z] The authors correctly note that the AKV method does not provide a complete map between the simulation frame and the AKV coordinates, making the AKV-z rotation of Eq. (38) underdetermined. This limitation should be stated already in Section IV where AKV-z is introduced, rather than only in the discussion, to avoid over-interpretation of Fig. 5.
  5. [Section IV, second paragraph] The sentence beginning 'In contrast to the isolated Kerr horizons of Sec. III, the individual horizons in a binary black-hole spacetime are' is left incomplete in the provided text; it should read 'are subject to the gravitational influence of the companion.' Please check the final version for completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CMM is a forward numerical pipeline validated against independent Kerr and binary benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The CMM takes as input the intrinsic horizon 2-metric and Ricci scalar, constructs a conformal round metric by solving Eq. (14) via discrete Ricci flow, fixes the Möbius gauge by Eq. (16), and then defines multipoles as integrals of the physical seed against the resulting harmonic basis (Eqs. (17)-(18)). No parameter is fitted to the target multipoles, and the validation targets are independent analytic Kerr results (Section III, Figs. 1-3) plus an independent high-accuracy final-spin value from Ref. [27] used only to compare late-time plateaus. The only self-citation, Ref. [3], appears in the introduction as motivation for quasi-local horizon diagnostics and is not load-bearing for any derivation. The statement that the fixed point of the discrete Ricci flow is, by construction, the solution of Eq. (14) is a discretization assertion, not an input-output identity. The absence of a convergence study is a robustness concern, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No physical parameters are fitted to the target multipoles. The multipoles depend on an externally chosen SO(3) frame and on numerical resolution choices. The core mathematical assumptions are imported from conformal geometry (existence and uniqueness) and numerical analysis (convergence of Ricci flow and spectral embedding). The Kerr benchmarks provide an external target for validation.

free parameters (1)
  • External round-sphere orientation (SO(3) reference frame) = polar axis = simulation z-axis (orbital angular momentum); azimuthal origin = simulation x-axis mapped to phi=0
    Section II B and IV: fixes the residual SO(3) freedom in the conformal multipoles. The values of I_lm coefficients, including the sign and amplitude of I2 and I22, change under this choice; the paper does not fit it to data but selects it by external convention.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the conformal unit round metric selected by the vanishing-area-dipole condition (positive area measure).
    Sec. II A, around Eq. (16); this is the theoretical foundation of CMM, imported from Ref. [14]. The paper does not prove uniqueness for the discretized problem.
  • domain assumption Discrete Ricci flow converges to a unit-round discrete metric whose continuum limit solves the Yamabe-type equation Eq. (14).
    Sec. II B Part (i); relies on Refs. [18,19]. No convergence parameters, stopping criteria, or mesh-refinement checks are given.
  • domain assumption Spectral embedding: the three lowest nontrivial eigenvectors of the discrete Laplacian approximate the round-sphere embedding coordinates on the conformal mesh.
    Sec. II B Part (ii); no theorem or error bound is given for distorted meshes, and sign or rotation ambiguities of eigenvectors are not discussed.
  • domain assumption Analytic Kerr benchmark expressions, in particular Z(u) in Eq. (34) and the conformal factor in Eq. (35), are correct.
    Sec. II A and III; used as validation targets. The derivation is not included, but it is attributed to the authors' analytic groundwork and to Ref. [16].
  • standard math Standard isolated-horizon identities, Eq. (2), connecting the intrinsic scalar curvature and rotation 1-form to the Weyl scalar Psi2.
    Sec. II A; background from Ref. [5] used to define the seed Phi_Delta that is expanded in multipoles.
  • domain assumption The apparent-horizon data extracted by AHFinderDirect and QuasiLocalMeasures faithfully provide the intrinsic 2-metric and Ricci scalar of the MOTS in the binary simulation.
    Sec. IV; standard numerical-relativity extraction, not independently verified here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Conformal-Mapping Method for Horizon Multipoles in Numerical Relativity: Implementation, Kerr Validation, and Applications Beyond Axisymmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQDFFCEZ

@misc{pith2026260807985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Conformal-Mapping Method for Horizon Multipoles in Numerical Relativity: Implementation, Kerr Validation, and Applications Beyond Axisymmetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQDFFCEZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07985}
}
read the original abstract

We present a numerical method that constructs geometrically defined coordinates on black-hole horizons, from which the multipole moments are computed without assuming axisymmetry. This method, which we denote the conformal-mapping method (CMM), provides a numerical realization of the conformal construction proposed by Ashtekar et al. in 2022, combining discrete Ricci flow, spectral embedding onto the unit sphere, and M\"obius gauge fixing by the vanishing-area-dipole condition. We first test the CMM against analytic Kerr benchmarks, and then apply it to an equal-mass, non-spinning binary black-hole merger. We also compare it with an approximate-symmetry-based method. The CMM allows the multipole moments to be expressed in a fixed reference frame, whereas the symmetry-adapted frame can reorient abruptly when the preferred approximate axis changes. In a frame aligned with the orbital angular momentum, the amplitude of the quadrupole mode grows during inspiral and decays after merger, displaying a qualitative ringdown behavior. These results show that the CMM is a useful tool for studying horizon geometry in dynamical situations where no stable symmetry axis is available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07985 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the logarithmic conformal factor λ as a function of the Boyer–Lindquist colatitude θBL for Kerr horizons with spins a/M ∈ {0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.0}. This is the numerical counterpart of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison of the colatitudes determined by the AKV method and CMM on Kerr horizons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Mass multipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Colatitude contours from the AKV method (top row) and CMM (bottom row) on an individual binary-black-hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dimensionless mass quadrupole moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of the geometric multipole moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Ashtekar, N

    A. Ashtekar, N. Khera, M. Kolanowski, and J. Lewandowski, Non-expanding horizons: multi- poles and the symmetry group, JHEP2022(01), 028, 14 arXiv:2111.07873 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  2. [16]

    Gourgoulhon, A

    E. Gourgoulhon, A. L. Tiec, and M. Casals, Horizon mul- tipole moments of a kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D (2026)

    2026

  3. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [2]

    Prasad, Tidal deformation of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers and its imprint on gravitational radiation, Phys

    V. Prasad, Tidal deformation of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers and its imprint on gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D109, 044033 (2024)

    2024

  5. [3]

    Bae, Y.-H

    Y.-B. Bae, Y.-H. Hyun, and G. Kang, Ringdown Gravita- tional Waves from Close Scattering of Two Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 261401 (2024), arXiv:2310.18686 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [4]

    Ribes Metidieri, B

    A. Ribes Metidieri, B. Bonga, and B. Krishnan, Black hole tomography: Unveiling black hole horizon dynamics via ringdown observations, Phys. Rev. D111, 104075 (2025), arXiv:2501.08964 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [5]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Engle, T. Pawlowski, and C. Van Den Broeck, Multipole moments of isolated hori- zons, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 2549 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0401114

    arXiv 2004

  8. [6]

    Schnetter, B

    E. Schnetter, B. Krishnan, and F. Beyer, Introduction to dynamical horizons in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D 74, 024028 (2006)

    work page 2006

Show all 27 references
  1. [7]

    Prasad, A

    V. Prasad, A. Gupta, S. Bose, and B. Krishnan, Tidal deformation of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D105, 044019 (2022), arXiv:2106.02595 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Ashtekar, M

    A. Ashtekar, M. Campiglia, and S. Shah, Dynamical black holes: Approach to the final state, Phys. Rev. D 88, 064045 (2013)

    2013

  3. [9]

    Gupta, B

    A. Gupta, B. Krishnan, A. Nielsen, and E. Schnetter, Dy- namics of marginally trapped surfaces in a binary black hole merger: Growth and approach to equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D97, 084028 (2018), arXiv:1801.07048 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Chenet al., Multipole moments on the common hori- zon in a binary-black-hole simulation, Phys

    Y. Chenet al., Multipole moments on the common hori- zon in a binary-black-hole simulation, Phys. Rev. D106, 124045 (2022), arXiv:2208.02965 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Dreyer, B

    O. Dreyer, B. Krishnan, D. Shoemaker, and E. Schnetter, Introduction to isolated horizons in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D67, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0206008

    2003 arXiv

  6. [12]

    G. B. Cook and B. F. Whiting, Approximate Killing Vectors on S**2, Phys. Rev. D76, 041501 (2007), arXiv:0706.0199 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Owen, The Final Remnant of Binary Black Hole Mergers: Multipolar Analysis, Phys

    R. Owen, The Final Remnant of Binary Black Hole Mergers: Multipolar Analysis, Phys. Rev. D80, 084012 (2009), arXiv:0907.0280 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Korzynski, Quasi-local angular momentum of non- symmetric isolated and dynamical horizons from the con- formal decomposition of the metric, Class

    M. Korzynski, Quasi-local angular momentum of non- symmetric isolated and dynamical horizons from the con- formal decomposition of the metric, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 5935 (2007), arXiv:0707.2824 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kinnersley, Type D Vacuum Metrics, J

    W. Kinnersley, Type D Vacuum Metrics, J. Math. Phys. 10, 1195 (1969)

    1969

  10. [18]

    Luo, Combinatorial Yamabe flow on surfaces, Com- mun

    F. Luo, Combinatorial Yamabe flow on surfaces, Com- mun. Contemp. Math.6, 765 (2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    Springborn, P

    B. Springborn, P. Schr¨ oder, and U. Pinkall, Conformal equivalence of triangle meshes, ACM Trans. Graph.27, 1 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    Rizzo, R

    M. Rizzo, R. Haas, B.-J. Tsao, D. Ferguson, H. J. Macpherson, L. Werneck, L. T. Sanches, P. Diener, S. R. Brandt, Z. Etienne,et al., The Einstein Toolkit (release, ET 2025 05), Zenodo (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Loffleret al., The Einstein Toolkit: A Commu- nity Computational Infrastructure for Relativistic As- trophysics, Class

    F. Loffleret al., The Einstein Toolkit: A Commu- nity Computational Infrastructure for Relativistic As- trophysics, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 115001 (2012), arXiv:1111.3344 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Ansorg, B

    M. Ansorg, B. Bruegmann, and W. Tichy, A Single- domain spectral method for black hole puncture data, Phys. Rev. D70, 064011 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404056

    2004 arXiv

  15. [23]

    J. D. Brown, P. Diener, O. Sarbach, E. Schnetter, and M. Tiglio, Turduckening black holes: An Analytical and computational study, Phys. Rev. D79, 044023 (2009), arXiv:0809.3533 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Schnetter, S

    E. Schnetter, S. H. Hawley, and I. Hawke, Evolutions in 3- D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 1465 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310042

    2004 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Pollney, C

    D. Pollney, C. Reisswig, E. Schnetter, N. Dorband, and P. Diener, High accuracy binary black hole simulations with an extended wave zone, Phys. Rev. D83, 044045 (2011), arXiv:0910.3803 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Thornburg, A Fast apparent horizon finder for three- dimensional Cartesian grids in numerical relativity, Class

    J. Thornburg, A Fast apparent horizon finder for three- dimensional Cartesian grids in numerical relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 743 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0306056

    2004 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. A. Scheel, M. Boyle, T. Chu, L. E. Kidder, K. D. Matthews, and H. P. Pfeiffer, High-accuracy waveforms for binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown, Phys. Rev. D79, 024003 (2009), arXiv:0810.1767 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.