Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 31 references

Fluctuation-based evidence for number--phase dynamics in a frustrated orbital superfluid

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that mode-resolved shot-to-shot population fluctuations in a three-valley orbital superfluid are captured by a canonical three-mode model whose inter-valley pair tunneling reveals number–phase dynamics hidden from static…

desk verdict The negative-bias anticorrelation dip may not uniquely require pair tunneling, but the stripe-phase confinement does, and the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08124 v1 pith:WHWCQNXH submitted 2026-08-08 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mech

Rui-Lang Zeng , Zi-Yao Zhang , Ling-Na Wu , Cong-Jie Zhang , Da-Gang Xia , Andreas Hemmerich , Xiao-Qiong Wang , Zhi-Fang Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech
keywords orbitalsuperfluidtriangularopticallatticethree-valleycondensatenumber-phasedynamicspairtunnelingshot-to-shotfluctuationscanonicalensemblefrustratedquantummatter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Frustrated quantum systems can hide their collective organization in the way competing configurations fluctuate, and this paper asks whether those fluctuations can be measured and interpreted. Using a p-orbital triangular-lattice superfluid whose three valleys can be biased relative to one another, the authors record shot-to-shot population fluctuations and compare them with a canonical three-mode model that includes inter-valley pair tunneling, with a single effective thermodynamic ratio $T/N = 0.04$ nK fixed by the overall fluctuation amplitude. They find the model captures three bias-tuned signatures: enhanced anticorrelated minority-valley fluctuations, a susceptibility peak near three-valley degeneracy, and confinement of relative-population fluctuations in a selected stripe phase. The paper interprets these signatures as pair-tunneling-induced number–phase back-action, where conjugate relative-phase dynamics softens barriers in the minority-valley regime and produces harmonic confinement in the stripe phase. If right, this establishes mode-resolved fluctuation measurements as a probe of collective dynamics beyond static mean-field order.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective three-mode Hamiltonian for the condensed $M_1,M_2,M_3$ valleys, $\hat{H} = \Delta E\,\hat{b}_1^\dagger \hat{b}_1 + \frac{U_1}{2}\sum_j \hat{b}_j^\dagger \hat{b}_j^\dagger \hat{b}_j \hat{b}_j + 2U_2 \sum_{i<j} \hat{b}_i^\dagger \hat{b}_j^\dagger \hat{b}_j \hat{b}_i + \frac{U_2}{2}\sum_{i<j}(\hat{b}_i^\dagger \hat{b}_i^\dagger \hat{b}_j \hat{b}_j + \mathrm{h.c.})$, where the last pair-tunneling term does not conserve individual valley populations and couples each valley-pair imbalance to its relative phase. The calculation uses the fixed-$N$ canonical ensemble with interaction scales $U_1 N = 3.32$ nK and $U_2 N = 1.82$ nK, controlled by the single ratio $T/N$. Two derived tools carry the interpretation: the number–phase commutator $[\hat{\phi},\hat{\eta}] = 2i$, which converts imbalance fluctuations into relative-phase spreading, and the harmonic expansion around the phase-locked stripe minimum, which yields a collective oscillator with frequency $\hbar\omega_p \simeq 2.33$ nK. The Husimi $Q$-distribution visualizes the same canonical state in the $(\eta/N, 2\phi)$ plane.

What would settle it

Measure the $M_2$–$M_3$ relative phase distribution interferometrically after the 130.1 ms preparation: the phase-scrambling picture predicts a broad distribution in $2\phi$ near the negative-bias dip, while a phase-locked landscape predicts a narrow distribution. Alternatively, vary the preparation time across the estimated $\tau_\phi \simeq 45$ ms scale and check whether $C_{23}$ and $\sigma_{\rm rel}^2$ stay fixed; the canonical equilibrium interpretation requires time independence, while kinetic trapping predicts evolution toward the measured values.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that the three-valley condensate's long-time shot-to-shot statistics form a quasi-equilibrium canonical distribution of an effective three-mode Hamiltonian, so that fluctuations encode the same pair-tunneling dynamics that shapes the static order. The evidence has three parts. At negative bias, the correlation coefficient $C_{23}$ between the two minority valleys dips below $-0.5$, reaching near $-0.8$, which the paper shows implies internal imbalance fluctuations dominate over total minority-population fluctuations: the two minority valleys compete as binary alternatives. The canonical model reproduces this dip, and the paper argues the sampling is made kinetically accessible because the imbalance $\eta = N_2 - N_3$ is conjugate to the relative phase $\phi$, so phase scrambling exponentially suppresses the phase-sensitive pair-tunneling penalty and lowers the effective barrier. At positive bias, the same pair-tunneling term locks the relative phase and maps residual fluctuations onto a macroscopic harmonic oscillator, with relative variance suppressed by the active population. Together the two regimes form a quantum–thermal picture of number–phase back-action in a frustrated condensate.

Load-bearing premise

The dissipative 130.1 ms preparation is assumed to bring the coherent three-valley condensate into the canonical equilibrium distribution of the effective three-mode Hamiltonian with a single fitted $T/N = 0.04$ nK, so if the fluctuations are instead set by preparation history, spatial inhomogeneity, or modes outside the three-valley manifold, the number–phase interpretation does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The measured fluctuations provide a quantitative constraint on the effective thermodynamic ratio $T/N$; if the canonical description is correct, this ratio is a quasi-equilibrium temperature for the coherent three-valley condensate even though it is not independent thermometry.
  • The anomalous dip $C_{23}<-0.5$ is a diagnostic of binary minority-valley competition; recording it as a function of bias maps the window where pair-tunneling-induced barrier softening operates.
  • In the stripe phase, the harmonic-oscillator description predicts $\sigma_{\rm rel}^2 \simeq \frac{1}{N_{\rm act}}\sqrt{\frac{2U_2}{U_1-U_2}}\coth(\hbar\omega_p/2k_BT)$, so the normalized relative variance decreases as $1/N_{\rm act}$ and interpolates between thermal equipartition and the zero-point limit.
  • Near three-valley degeneracy, the total variance $(\Delta n)^2$ acts as a collective susceptibility; the peak marks the soft point where small valley-energy offsets produce the largest population redistribution.
  • If the interpretation holds, mode-resolved fluctuations in repeated cold-atom preparations offer a general probe of hidden conjugate dynamics in frustrated multi-component condensates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the same shot-to-shot fluctuation protocol could detect pair-tunneling-like coupling in other multi-valley or spinor condensates where the relative phase is not directly measurable, since the signature is contained in population correlations alone.
  • The phase-scrambling mechanism makes a dynamical prediction the paper does not test: the depth of the $C_{23}$ dip and the relative variance should depend on preparation time, because barrier softening requires the phase variance to grow on the $\sim 45$ ms scale.
  • If the canonical equilibrium description is correct, $T/N$ could serve as a fluctuation-based effective thermometer for lattice condensates, although the paper explicitly notes it is not an independent temperature measurement.
  • By analogy with intertwined orders in solid-state systems, the cold-atom result suggests that joint fluctuation statistics, not just static order parameters, may be required to identify competing order in cuprates, moiré systems, or kagome metals; direct measurement there remains a challenge.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports shot-to-shot population fluctuation measurements in a p-orbital triangular-lattice 87Rb superfluid with three M-point valley minima, tuned by an energy bias ΔE. The authors define normalized valley populations n_i and study the bias dependence of the fluctuation amplitudes Δn_i, the minority-valley correlation C_23, the total fluctuation metric (Δn)^2, and the stripe-phase relative variance σ_rel^2. They compare these observables with a fixed-N canonical calculation of an effective three-mode Hamiltonian, Eq. (1)/(S1), which contains a valley bias, density interactions, and an inter-valley pair-tunneling term. With interaction scales U_1N=3.32 nK and U_2N=1.82 nK taken from Bloch-function overlap estimates, a single effective thermodynamic ratio T/N=0.04 nK is chosen to match the overall fluctuation amplitude, and the resulting model curves are shown to reproduce the qualitative bias-dependent hierarchy of all four observables. On this basis the paper argues for a quasi-equilibrium description of the coherent three-valley condensate and for pair-tunneling-induced number–phase dynamics: relative-phase scrambling softens the minority-valley barrier in the negative-bias regime, while phase rigidity confines imbalance fluctuations harmonically in the positive-bias stripe phase. The manuscript is explicit that the relative phase is not directly measured and that the Husimi Q visualizations are representations of the same fitted canonical density matrix.

Significance. If the central interpretation is correct, the work would establish mode-resolved population fluctuations as a practical probe of hidden number–phase back-action in frustrated multi-valley superfluids, a genuinely interesting extension of fluctuation measurements beyond static order parameters. The paper has real strengths: the interaction scales U_1N and U_2N are computed from first-principles overlap integrals rather than treated as free parameters; the canonical three-mode calculations are carried out without uncontrolled approximations; the negative-bias decomposition of C_23 in terms of total-minority versus internal-imbalance fluctuations is clean and testable; and the manuscript repeatedly and honestly acknowledges that the relative phase is not measured, that T/N is an effective fitted quantity, and that the (Δn)^2 peak amplitude is overpredicted. These strengths, however, do not by themselves close the main interpretive gap: every reported observable is a trace over phase variables, and the paper never computes the one-line baseline obtained by setting the pair-tunneling term to zero.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Fig. 2; Eq. (S1); Supplement S2D] The central attribution of the anomalous C23 dip to pair-tunneling-induced number–phase dynamics is not established, because the paper never computes the density-only baseline obtained by removing the pair-tunneling term from Eq. (S1). All reported observables (Δn_i, C23, (Δn)^2, σ_rel^2) are traces over phase variables, and for the quoted values U_1N=3.32 nK and U_2N=1.82 nK the diagonal model already has a negative imbalance curvature proportional to U_1−2U_2 in Eq. (S33), so imbalanced minority-valley configurations are thermally favored even with the phase-sensitive term absent. A canonical calculation with the pair-tunneling amplitude set to zero is a one-line deletion from the existing numerical code and is necessary to show that the data select the pair-tunneling mechanism rather than a density-only explanation. The uncertainty in the filling estimate ν≈8 acknowledged in Supplement S1E makes this exclusion especially pressing, since the sign of U_1−2U_2 is the decisive quantity here.
  2. [Main text, Figs. 1(c)–(d), 3(a)–(b); Supplement S1D] The comparison is not as constraining as the wording "captures the main structure" suggests, because T/N=0.04 nK is fitted to the global fluctuation amplitude; Supplement S1D states that this value is "constrained by the global comparison with the measured bias-dependent fluctuation trajectory," and the same fitted value then produces all theoretical curves and the Husimi Q visualizations used to argue for phase scrambling and rigidity. Moreover, at this fitted value the model visibly overpredicts the measured (Δn)^2 peak near ΔE≈0: the experimental peak in Fig. 3(a) is lower than the thick blue model curve in Fig. 3(b). The paper's candidate explanations in Supplement S3C (thermally populated modes, spatial averaging, finite-time relaxation) are plausible, but they mean that the near-degeneracy regime—the regime most central to the susceptibility claim—is not quantitatively captured by the model as presented. An independent thermometry or particle-number constraint, or a systematic parameter-sensitivity analysis, would be needed to support a quantitative rather than qualitative reading.
  3. [Supplement S2C–S2D; Fig. 2(c)] The phase-scrambling mechanism is inferred, not observed. The paper itself states in Supplement S2C that "the relative phase itself is not directly measured," and the Husimi Q distributions in Fig. 2(c) are computed from the same canonical density matrix whose T/N was fitted to the population data, so they cannot serve as independent evidence for relative-phase broadening. The kinetic benchmark estimates (τ_cl_cross ~150 ms versus τ_flat_cross ~8 ms in S2B–S2D) are order-of-magnitude estimates that depend on the transient active minority population N_act, for which no directly measured value is reported; Supplement S2C also notes that the growth rate K depends on transient populations during preparation. This does not invalidate the model, but it means the number–phase interpretation rests on the internal consistency of the model rather than on a decisive experimental observable.
  4. [Supplement S1D, S2B; Eq. (S6)] The canonical-ensemble premise is load-bearing but not independently supported. The claim that 130.1 ms of dissipative preparation drives the coherent three-valley condensate into the fixed-N canonical distribution of Eq. (S6) with a single effective T/N is central to every comparison, yet the paper provides no dissipative master equation, no study of initial-condition dependence, and no explicit test that the measured distribution is stationary in time. The barrier-crossing and phase-spreading estimates in Supplement S2B–S2C are heuristic and do not constitute a relaxation calculation. Given that a preparation-history-dependent population distribution could, in principle, reproduce the same fluctuation observables, the quasi-equilibrium claim needs either a direct experimental test (for example, varying the dissipative evolution time and checking convergence of the fluctuation statistics) or a quantitative dynamical model of the preparation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, first model paragraph; Supplement S1D] Please clarify in the main text that T/N is an effective fitted thermodynamic ratio, not an independently measured temperature; the current wording — "we find that T/N=0.04 nK captures the main structure" — reads as a determined quantity, and Supplement S1D is more explicit that it is constrained by the global comparison.
  2. [Fig. 2(c) and inset of Fig. 4(c)] The axes labeled η/N and 2φ should state explicitly that φ is the M_2–M_3 relative phase in radians and that the vertical dashed lines in Fig. 2(c) mark ±⟨n_2+n_3⟩; this information is in the text and caption fragments but is not collected in one place.
  3. [Supplement S3B, Eqs. (S37)–(S39)] The zero-temperature discrete-manifold limit (Δn)^2=1/6 assumes equal sampling over the three population-distinct stripe configurations; please state whether such equal sampling is a consequence of the canonical zero-temperature ensemble or an additional modeling assumption.
  4. [Supplement S2B] The order-of-magnitude tunneling reference τ_0 ~ 5 ms cites Ref. [27] for p-orbital tunneling amplitudes of order 10 nK; a specific equation or band-calculation result would make the kinetic estimate easier to check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the single fitted T/N is a transparent global scale, and the fluctuation shapes and correlations are not forced by it.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The main text explicitly states that the effective thermodynamic ratio is obtained from the overall fluctuation amplitude: 'Because the absolute in situ temperature and coherent atom number are difficult to determine independently from time-of-flight images, we consider a single effective thermodynamic ratio, T /N, from the overall fluctuation amplitude.' The same value T/N=0.04 nK is subsequently used for the canonical calculations of C23, (Delta n)^2, and sigma_rel^2. This is a one-parameter normalization of the overall fluctuation scale, not a per-observable fit; the non-monotonic bias dependence, the anomalous dip C23<-0.5, the susceptibility peak near degeneracy, and the plateau in sigma_rel^2 are nontrivial shapes that could have disagreed with the data. The interaction scales U1N=3.32 nK and U2N=1.82 nK are obtained from microscopic overlap integrals and the filling estimate in Supplemental Notes 1B-1D, not from the fluctuation observables. The Husimi Q distributions are explicitly derived from the same canonical density matrix and are presented as model-supported visualizations, not as independent phase measurements. The main weakness is underdetermination relative to a pair-tunneling-free density-only Hamiltonian, which is not computed as a baseline; that is a missing test or alternative-model concern, not a circular reduction within the paper's own equations. Self-citations to Refs. [21,26,27,30] provide prior experimental and theoretical background and do not carry a uniqueness claim or an unverified load-bearing premise. No quoted step reduces a prediction to an input by construction, so no circularity step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central comparison rests on one fitted parameter (T/N), one estimated filling (nu), and the choice of N_act for order-of-magnitude kinetic estimates. The Hamiltonian and canonical ensemble are standard tools, but the equilibrium assumption and the phase-space visualization carry the interpretation.

free parameters (3)
  • Effective thermodynamic ratio T/N = 0.04 nK
    Chosen to match the overall bias-dependent fluctuation amplitude; controls width and depth of all computed curves.
  • Effective filling nu = approximately 8 atoms per unit cell
    Used to convert microscopic overlap integrals into U1N and U2N; not independently measured; affects the overall interaction scale and thus the bias range of theoretical features.
  • Active minority population N_act for barrier estimates = N/2 (upper bound)
    Used in the classical barrier, phase-spreading, and harmonic-oscillator estimates; authors note the measured N_act near the dip is smaller, so the value is an upper-bound scale.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The three-valley condensate is described by the effective three-mode Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) with intra-valley U1, inter-valley density and pair-tunneling U2.
    Justified by sharp Bragg peaks at the M points; neglects non-condensed modes and spatial inhomogeneity.
  • domain assumption The measured long-time state follows a fixed-N canonical Boltzmann distribution with a single effective temperature T.
    Central quasi-equilibrium assumption; the dissipative preparation is asserted to enable relaxation toward this distribution; T/N is then fitted to the data.
  • standard math The number-phase commutator [phi_hat, eta_hat] = 2i for the minority-valley pair.
    Standard large-N approximation for canonically conjugate phase and population imbalance, invoked in Supplemental Note 2C to derive phase-spreading dynamics.
  • domain assumption The Debye-Waller-type leading-cumulant suppression of the phase-sensitive term, with <cos 2 phi> approximately cos(2<phi>) exp(-2<(delta phi)^2>).
    Approximation used to connect phase variance to barrier softening; assumes a locally Gaussian phase distribution.
  • domain assumption The sampled atoms are dominated by the coherent three-mode component; background modes and finite integration windows only dilute contrast.
    Used to interpret the reduced (Delta n)^2 peak; the paper provides partial evidence by shrinking the integration window, but does not fully correct for background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluctuation-based evidence for number--phase dynamics in a frustrated orbital superfluid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WHWCQNXH

@misc{pith2026260808124,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluctuation-based evidence for number--phase dynamics in a frustrated orbital superfluid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WHWCQNXH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08124}
}
abstract

Frustrated quantum matter can host intertwined orders rooted in symmetry-related low-energy landscapes, yet static order parameters alone do not reveal how fluctuations are organized among competing configurations. Here we measure mode-resolved shot-to-shot population fluctuations in a $p$-orbital triangular-lattice superfluid with a tunable bias among three valleys. We observe a bias-tuned evolution from enhanced, anticorrelated fluctuations of two minority valleys toward strong confinement of relative-population fluctuations in a selected two-valley stripe phase. The dominant fluctuation structure is captured by an effective canonical model that includes interactions among the condensed modes, supporting a quasi-equilibrium description of the coherent three-valley condensate. Together, the data and model reveal a quantum--thermal regime shaped by pair-tunneling-induced number--phase dynamics, in which relative-phase scrambling softens effective barriers in the minority-valley regime, while phase rigidity gives rise to macroscopic harmonic confinement in the stripe phase. Our results establish mode-resolved fluctuation measurements as a probe of hidden number--phase back-action in frustrated quantum fluids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08124 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (c), the measured fluctuations are redistributed non-monotonically with bias. In the large negative-bias regime, where M1 hosts the dominant condensate (cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (b). Varying T /N changes both the depth and width of the C23 minimum: lower effective temperature drives the system toward the ideal binary-competition limit C23 → −1, whereas higher temperature washes out the binary structure and pushes C23 back above the −0.5 threshold. The experimentally constrained ra￾tio T /N = 0.04 nK captures the observed anomalous dip, indicating equilibrium-like sampling of two compet￾ing … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Measured normalized relative variance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Wang, G.-Q

    X.-Q. Wang, G.-Q. Luo, J.-Y. Liu, G.-H. Huang, Z.-X. Li, C. Wu, A. Hemmerich, and Z.-F. Xu, Evidence for quantum stripe ordering in a triangular optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 226001 (2023)

    2023

  2. [1]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Collo- quium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 457 (2015)

    2015

  3. [2]

    D. F. Agterberg, J. C. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radz- ihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Wang, The physics of pair-density waves: cuprate superconductors and be- yond, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 231 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [3]

    M. H. Hamidian, S. D. Edkins, S. H. Joo, A. Kostin, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. J. Lawler, E.-A. Kim, A. P. Mackenzie, K. Fujita, J. Lee, and J. C. S. Davis, Detec- tion of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, Nature (London)532, 343 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [4]

    Comin, R

    R. Comin, R. Sutarto, E. H. da Silva Neto, L. Chauvi` ere, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, F. He, G. A. Sawatzky, and A. Damascelli, Broken translational and rotational symmetry via charge stripe order in under- doped YBa 2Cu3O6+y, Science347, 1335 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [5]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture (London)556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [6]

    E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDonald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nat. Mater.19, 1265 (2020)

    2020

  8. [7]

    D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, L. Xian, A. Georges, A. J. Millis, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, D. N. Basov, A. N. Pa- supathy, and A. Rubio, Moir´ e heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator, Nat. Phys.17, 155 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 31 references
  1. [8]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, J. M. Park, N. F. Q. Yuan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Fernandes, L. Fu, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nematicity and competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene, Science372, 264 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    Jiang, X

    Y. Jiang, X. Lai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Haule, J. Mao, and E. Y. Andrei, Charge order and broken rota- tional symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature (London)573, 91 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    Jiang, J.-X

    Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, M. M. Denner, N. Shumiya, B. R. Ortiz, G. Xu, Z. Guguchia, J. He, M. S. Hossain, X. Liu, 6 J. Ruff, L. Kautzsch, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, I. Belopol- ski, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Thomale, T. ...

    2021

  4. [11]

    H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling kagome superconduc- tor,...

    2021

  5. [12]

    L. Nie, K. Sun, W. Ma, D. Song, L. Zheng, Z. Liang, P. Wu, F. Yu, J. Li, M. Shan, D. Zhao, S. Li, B. Kang, Z. Wu, Y. Zhou, K. Liu, Z. Xiang, J. Ying, Z. Wang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Charge-density-wave-driven elec- tronic nematicity in a kagome superconductor, Nature (London)604,...

    2022

  6. [13]

    Neupert, M

    T. Neupert, M. M. Denner, J.-X. Yin, R. Thomale, and M. Z. Hasan, Charge order and superconductivity in kagome materials, Nat. Phys.18, 137 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    R. M. Fernandes, P. P. Orth, and J. Schmalian, Inter- twined vestigial order in quantum materials: nematicity and beyond, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 133 (2019)

    2019

  8. [15]

    Hwangbo, E

    K. Hwangbo, E. Rosenberg, J. Cenker, Q. Jiang, H. Wen, D. Xiao, J.-H. Chu, and X. Xu, Strain tuning of vestigial three-state Potts nematicity in a correlated antiferromag- net, Nat. Phys.20, 1888 (2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  10. [17]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb` ene, Quantum sim- ulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nat. Phys.8, 267 (2012)

    2012

  11. [18]

    Altman, E

    E. Altman, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body states of ultracold atoms via noise correlations, Phys. Rev. A70, 013603 (2004)

    2004

  12. [19]

    F¨ olling, F

    S. F¨ olling, F. Gerbier, A. Widera, O. Mandel, T. Gericke, and I. Bloch, Spatial quantum noise interferometry in expanding ultracold atom clouds, Nature (London)434, 481 (2005)

    2005

  13. [20]

    Schweigler, V

    T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, I. Mazets, B. Rauer, F. Cataldini, T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges, and J. Schmiedmayer, Experimental characterization of a quantum many-body system via higher-order correla- tions, Nature (London)545, 323 (2017)

    2017

  14. [21]

    Wang, R.-L

    X.-Q. Wang, R.-L. Zeng, Z.-Y. Zhang, C. Tian, S. Zhang, A. Hemmerich, and Z.-F. Xu, Observation of Brownian motion of a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 223402 (2025)

    2025

  15. [22]

    Struck, M

    J. Struck, M. Weinberg, C. ¨Olschl¨ ager, P. Windpassinger, J. Simonet, K. Sengstock, R. H¨ oppner, P. Hauke, A. Eckardt, M. Lewenstein, and L. Mathey, Engineering Ising-XY spin-models in a triangular lattice using tun- able artificial gauge fields, Nat. Phys.9, 738 (2013)

    2013

  16. [23]

    C. V. Parker, L.-C. Ha, and C. Chin, Direct observa- tion of effective ferromagnetic domains of cold atoms in a shaken optical lattice, Nat. Phys.9, 769 (2013)

    2013

  17. [24]

    Wirth, M

    G. Wirth, M. ¨Olschl¨ ager, and A. Hemmerich, Evidence for orbital superfluidity in the P-band of a bipartite op- tical square lattice, Nat. Phys.7, 147 (2011)

    2011

  18. [25]

    T. Kock, C. Hippler, A. Ewerbeck, and A. Hemmerich, Orbital optical lattices with bosons, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.49, 042001 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    Wang, G.-Q

    X.-Q. Wang, G.-Q. Luo, J.-Y. Liu, W. V. Liu, A. Hem- merich, and Z.-F. Xu, Evidence for an atomic chiral su- perfluid with topological excitations, Nature (London) 596, 227 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    L. W. Clark, L. Feng, and C. Chin, Universal space-time scaling symmetry in the dynamics of bosons across a quantum phase transition, Science354, 606 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    C. Wu, W. V. Liu, J. Moore, and S. D. Sarma, Quantum stripe ordering in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 190406 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Hemmerich, Bosons condensed in two modes with flavor-changing interaction, Phys

    A. Hemmerich, Bosons condensed in two modes with flavor-changing interaction, Phys. Rev. A99, 013623 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    See Supplemental Material for details. 7 Supplemental Material SUPPLEMENT AL NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE THREE-MODE MODEL AND P ARAMETER ESTIMA TES This note summarizes the effective three-mode model, parameter estimates, canonical calculation and phase-space representation used for the...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.