Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

RayLift: Lifting Complementary Ray-Wise Evidence with 3D Geometry Priors for Semantic Scene Completion

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read RayLift treats stereo depth as a metric reference rather than a fixed surface, lifting complementary monocular geometry priors into ray-wise voxel evidence and consistently improving 3D semantic scene completion on SemanticKITTI and…

desk verdict Solid incremental SSC paper with a genuinely new ray-evidence mechanism; the main thing to push on is the unvalidated stereo-to-monocular depth calibration. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08476 v1 pith:MCNO4T3B submitted 2026-08-09 cs.CV

Meng Wang , Hongxia Yu , Wenzhe He , Xingdong Song , Huilong Pi , Jiapeng Zhang , Ruihui Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords semanticscenecompletionstereodepthray-wiseevidence3Dvisionfoundationmodeluncertaintyvoxelrepresentationoccupancypredictioncamera-basedperception
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that camera-based 3D semantic scene completion improves when stereo depth is demoted from a deterministic constraint to a metric reference, and a second, complementary depth hypothesis from a pretrained 3D vision model is lifted along each camera ray as independent evidence. RayLift does this with three modules: a Complementary Context Encoder that fuses geometry-aware foundation-model features into the image context, a Depth Ray Evidence Lifter that samples and weights candidate surface locations per ray, and a Semantic-Aware Voxel Integrator that injects the ray evidence into the voxel representation. On the SemanticKITTI hidden test set the paper reports 48.38% occupancy IoU and 18.54% semantic mIoU, surpassing a reproduced VoxDet baseline by 1.10 and 0.54 percentage points, with consistent gains on SSCBench-KITTI-360. A sympathetic reader would care because this suggests that stereo correspondence errors do not have to be absorbed passively by a voxel network; they can be challenged locally by alternative geometry evidence without losing the metric scale that stereo provides.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Depth Ray Evidence Lifter (DREL), organized around camera rays. Each $8\times 8$ image region becomes a ray cell; the cell selects the frontmost valid stereo depth and the co-located scale-calibrated visual-geometry depth, and encodes their relationship in the ray geometry descriptor $\mathbf{q}_r = [h_r, \delta_r, |\delta_r|, c_r, v_r, e_r]$. The descriptor tells the network whether a cell is locally stable or contains a depth discontinuity, how far apart and in which order the two surfaces lie, and how much to trust the visual-geometry surface. DREL then samples $K=4$ positions per ray, namely the stereo surface, the visual-geometry surface, and one additional sample $0.5\ell_r$ behind each, back-projects them with context features and learned write weights, and aggregates them by trilinear interpolation into ray-wise voxel evidence $V_1$. A separate Semantic-Aware Voxel Integrator fuses $V_1$ with the standard lifted volume $V_0$, using a semantic activation mask and a global magnitude clip so that ray evidence refines, rather than dominates, the existing voxel representation.

What would settle it

Compute per-frame scale factors between stereo depth and visual-geometry depth on frames with ground-truth depth, and check whether the median-ratio calibration is close to the true scale in regions where stereo is known to be biased, such as distant or reflective surfaces. Concretely, multiply a held-out set of stereo depth maps by a known bias such as $1.1\times$ and measure whether RayLift's IoU and mIoU degrade more than a deterministic-lifting baseline; a larger degradation would confirm that the metric-reference calibration is load-bearing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

RayLift's central claim is that the local disagreement between stereo depth and a visual-geometry depth prediction from a frozen 3D foundation model is usable signal, not noise to be averaged away. Before comparison, the visual-geometry depth is rescaled to metric units by the per-frame median ratio with stereo depth over valid overlapping pixels. The Depth Ray Evidence Lifter keeps the two estimates as distinct candidate surfaces along each camera ray, characterizes their relationship with a six-component ray geometry descriptor $\mathbf{q}_r = [h_r, \delta_r, |\delta_r|, c_r, v_r, e_r]$ (depth-distribution entropy, signed and unsigned log-depth discrepancy, relative confidence, validity, and within-cell depth variation), samples four positions per ray, writes context features into the voxel grid with learned weights, and lets the Semantic-Aware Voxel Integrator fuse this evidence into the standard lifted volume. The paper reports that this design consistently outperforms the reproduced VoxDet baseline on SemanticKITTI and SSCBench-KITTI-360, and that the gains persist when either the geometry prior source or the stereo estimator is swapped.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that the per-frame median ratio between stereo depth and visual-geometry depth is a valid metric scale for the visual-geometry depth; if stereo depth is systematically biased in the regions where the monocular prior is actually correct, the two candidate surfaces are compared at the wrong scale and the ray evidence is placed at the wrong locations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Camera-based SSC can improve occupancy IoU and semantic mIoU without changing the stereo estimator, by adding complementary monocular depth hypotheses and confidence-weighted sampling along each ray.
  • Local stereo correspondence errors near boundaries and weakly textured regions need not propagate unopposed into the voxel grid; the ray-wise pathway supplies alternative surface evidence at exactly those locations.
  • The gain is carried by the dual-surface ray representation, not by any single geometry model: swapping the foundation model or the stereo source preserves the improvement, although the ranking between specific sources can flip between validation and test.
  • Because the initial depth-distribution lifting path is retained, RayLift can be grafted onto an existing lifting-based SSC framework rather than requiring a new 3D representation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the complementary-surface mechanism is the source of the gain, the same ray-wise treatment could transfer to other lifting-based 3D perception tasks, such as BEV semantic segmentation or general occupancy prediction, where a single depth estimate currently commits image evidence to one location.
  • The per-frame median-ratio calibration suggests a testable prediction: the improvements should concentrate in frames where stereo and monocular depth disagree in a locally consistent way, and providing a better metric scale should shift where the gains appear.
  • The paper's own single-frame limitation points to a natural extension: accumulating ray evidence across temporally adjacent frames with ego-motion compensation could stabilize surfaces that are temporarily occluded or weakly textured, though dynamic objects would need explicit handling to avoid stale evidence.
  • The reversal in stereo-source ranking between validation and hidden test suggests that raw stereo accuracy is not the limiting factor; modeling the reliability of each candidate surface may matter more than choosing the most accurate stereo estimator.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. RayLift proposes a camera-based semantic scene completion framework that keeps stereo depth as a metric reference while injecting complementary ray-wise evidence from a frozen 3D vision foundation model. The method has three main components: a Complementary Context Encoder that fuses VFM geometry features with image features, a Depth Ray Evidence Lifter that aligns stereo and visual-geometry surfaces per camera ray, samples candidate surface locations, and constructs localized voxel evidence, and a Semantic-Aware Voxel Integrator that selectively injects this evidence into the initial voxel representation. The paper reports consistent improvements over reproduced VoxDet and other baselines on the SemanticKITTI hidden test set (48.38% IoU, 18.54% mIoU) and on SSCBench-KITTI-360, with additional ablations varying the context encoder, DREL components, ray-cell sizes, stereo sources, and foundation models.

Significance. If the reported results hold, RayLift makes a useful empirical contribution by showing that a monocular visual-geometry prior can be converted into spatially localized, ray-wise voxel evidence rather than being collapsed into a single depth distribution. The evaluation on two public benchmarks, including hidden test sets, is appropriate, and the component ablations are reasonably thorough. The paper also demonstrates flexibility across several 3D foundation models and stereo estimators, which supports the generality of the proposed mechanism. The main reservations are the lack of statistical confidence measures for small performance gaps, a contradiction in the DREL ablation interpretation, and an unvalidated per-frame depth-scale calibration that is load-bearing for the central ray-evidence construction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Ablation Studies, Table 5] The 'Surface samples only' row reports IoU = 48.0758%, which is higher than the Full DREL IoU of 47.9753%, yet the text states that the two neighboring samples 'provide useful local context and depth-error information that cannot be retained by the exact surface samples alone.' This directly contradicts the occupancy claim; the neighboring samples improve mIoU by 0.74 points but decrease IoU by 0.10 points. The interpretation should be corrected or qualified, and the discrepancy should be discussed (e.g., as an accuracy/robustness trade-off).
  2. [Supplement, Depth Ray Evidence Lifter] The per-frame scale calibration computes the median ratio of stereo depth to visual-geometry depth and uses it as a scalar multiplier for the VGGT depth. This assumes stereo depth is an unbiased metric reference at the pixels used for calibration. If stereo has systematic bias in precisely the regions where the monocular prior is complementary (reflective, dark, distant, or occluded surfaces), the scalar transfers that bias to the visual-geometry surface and the signed discrepancy δ_r and the sample depths in Eq. (4) describe metrically wrong locations. The paper provides no sensitivity analysis, failure study, or alternative calibration for this step. Please add an analysis such as: comparison with an oracle scale from LiDAR, injecting controlled scale errors and measuring downstream IoU/mIoU, or reporting cases where the calibration ratio distribution is multimodal or inconsistent with the visible geometry.
  3. [Tables 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6] All reported numbers appear to come from a single run per configuration, without error bars or multiple-seed statistics. The performance differences that support the main claims are small (e.g., Table 3, CoCE adds 0.35 IoU; DREL adds 0.16 IoU; SAVI changes IoU by -0.06 and mIoU by +0.58), and the hidden-test gaps are 1.10 IoU and 0.54 mIoU. Without variance estimates or at least three seeds for the ablations, it is unclear whether the component-level and cross-method differences are statistically meaningful. Please provide standard deviations or a significance analysis, at least for the central ablations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] Several class-wise entries in Table 1 are numerically garbled or merged, for instance the Symphonies row contains '23.13.21.92.016.1', the VLScene row contains '3.88.326.4', and the VoxDet row contains '35.335.112.9'. These entries must be reformatted so that every class has a separate, readable value.
  2. [Methodology, Eq. (3) and Supplement Table 1] The definition of e_r in Eq. (3) uses d_min^r in the denominator, while the supplementary Table 1 defines e_r with max(d_min^r, 10^{-3}) and a clip to [0,2]. These definitions should be reconciled, and the clipping threshold should be stated consistently in the main text.
  3. [Methodology, Depth Ray Evidence Lifter] In the sentence 'A smaller indicates limited depth variation around the representative surface,' the symbol e_r is missing after 'smaller'.
  4. [Supplement, Table 4] The comparison 'Modify Depth Probability Distribution' versus 'RayLift' would be more informative if the text explained what exactly is modified (e.g., replacing the LSS distribution with a calibrated combination of stereo and VGGT depths) and whether that baseline also uses CoCE with the same backbone features.
  5. [General] The figures use full-width parentheses in captions such as 'RayLift（Ours）'; these should be replaced with standard ASCII parentheses for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: RayLift's central claims rest on external benchmark comparisons, not on fitting or renaming its own inputs.

full rationale

RayLift's central claim is empirical: it reports occupancy IoU and semantic mIoU on the SemanticKITTI hidden test server and SSCBench-KITTI-360, comparing against reproduced baselines including VoxDet. These metrics are not derived from the method's inputs by construction; they are measured outcomes on held-out data. The per-frame scale calibration in the appendix ('We therefore calibrate its scale on a per-frame basis using stereo depth... the median of the remaining ratios is used as the scale factor') couples the visual-geometry depth to the stereo reference, but this is a design assumption about metric scale, not a prediction that reduces to its inputs: the scale factor is computed from the two depth maps and never appears as the SSC objective or as the reported IoU/mIoU. The cited VGGT-Omega, MoGe-2, and Depth Anything models are external pretrained sources; the only self-citation (VLScene, Wang et al. 2025b) appears in related work and is not load-bearing. No equation in the paper defines the reported result in terms of the fitted or calibrated quantities, and no parameter fitted to the target metric is renamed as a prediction. The paper's stated limitation of processing each stereo pair independently is a scope limitation, not a circular step. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The method introduces several hand-set hyperparameters and learned components, but the central performance claim is benchmark-based. The main unstated dependence is on the quality of the frozen foundation model and on the per-frame stereo-based scale calibration.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha (residual scaling in CoCE) = not stated
    Fixed scalar in Eq. 1 controlling how much of the visual-geometry feature is injected; no value or sensitivity analysis is given.
  • kappa (SAVI clipping range) = not stated
    Clipping coefficient in Eq. 6 that prevents individual ray samples from dominating; value not reported.
  • ray-adaptive sample range ℓ_r = learned end-to-end
    Determines the offset of the neighboring samples behind each candidate surface in Eq. 4; learned, so effective value is data-dependent.
  • SAVI hyperparameters (tau, T, amin) = 0.75, 0.35, 0.02
    Hand-set in the appendix: τ controls response center, T controls smoothness, amin is minimum update strength.
  • ray-cell size = 8x8
    Design choice comparing 8x8 vs 4x4; the coarser cell is retained.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Stereo depth provides a reliable metric reference
    The method uses stereo depth both as a candidate surface and as the reference for per-frame scale calibration of the visual-geometry depth.
  • domain assumption Frozen 3D vision foundation models provide transferable geometry features and depth that are complementary to stereo
    CoCE and DREL rely on VGGT-Omega or MoGe-2 features/depth; the paper ablated several models, so this is partially tested.
  • ad hoc to paper The ray descriptor and sampling scheme (minimum-depth representative, four samples per ray, 8x8 cells) captures the relevant geometric relationship
    This design is justified by ablations but is specific to this method, with no independent theoretical basis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RayLift: Lifting Complementary Ray-Wise Evidence with 3D Geometry Priors for Semantic Scene Completion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MCNO4T3B

@misc{pith2026260808476,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RayLift: Lifting Complementary Ray-Wise Evidence with 3D Geometry Priors for Semantic Scene Completion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MCNO4T3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08476}
}
read the original abstract

Camera-based 3D semantic scene completion (SSC) provides comprehensive scene understanding for autonomous driving and robotics. However, existing methods often treat stereo depth estimates as deterministic geometric constraints, causing depth uncertainty and local correspondence errors to propagate directly into voxel representations. To address this issue, we propose RayLift, a framework that uses stereo geometry as a metric reference while incorporating complementary ray evidence to recover reliable 3D structures adaptively. RayLift first employs a Complementary Context Encoder that extracts geometry-aware priors from a frozen 3D vision foundation model, thereby enriching the scene context. It then introduces a Depth Ray Evidence Lifter module that jointly models geometric dissimilarity, depth confidence, and spatial uncertainty to adaptively sample and weight candidate surface locations along each camera ray. Finally, a Semantic-Aware Voxel Integrator injects the resulting ray evidence into voxel features by explicitly modeling their spatial support. Extensive experiments on SemanticKITTI and SSCBench-KITTI-360 demonstrate that RayLift achieves competitive performance and consistently outperforms existing methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08476 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Motivation of RayLift. This figure illustrates how [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall architecture of RayLift. (a) The Complementary Context Encoder extracts multi-level geometry-aware features [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative comparisons on the SemanticKITTI validation set. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of prediction corrections on SemanticKITTI. Green indicates semantic corrections in regions previously [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Failure Cases. Model Limitations RayLift currently processes each stereo pair independently and constructs ray evidence from a single frame. It therefore does not exploit temporal continuity or observations accu￾mulated across adjacent frames, which could provide addi￾…
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Additional qualitative comparisons on the SemanticKITTI validation set. From left to right: input RGB image, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Additional qualitative visualization of the corrected regions on the SemanticKITTI validation set. From left to right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education

    Clancey, William J. Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83)

  2. [2]

    Classification Problem Solving

    Clancey, William J. Classification Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  3. [3]

    , title =

    Robinson, Arthur L. , title =. 1980 , doi =. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/208/4447/1019.full.pdf , journal =

    1980

  4. [4]

    New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry

    Robinson, Arthur L. New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry. Science

  5. [5]

    Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =

    Diane Warner Hasling and William J. Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =. Strategic explanations for a diagnostic consultation system , journal =. 1984 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80003-6 , url =

    doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(84)80003-6 1984

  6. [6]

    and Rennels, Glenn R

    Hasling, Diane Warner and Clancey, William J. and Rennels, Glenn R. and Test, Thomas. Strategic Explanations in Consultation---Duplicate. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

  7. [7]

    Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

    Rice, James. Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

  8. [8]

    Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

    Clancey, William J. Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    The Engineering of Qualitative Models

    Clancey, William J. The Engineering of Qualitative Models

  2. [10]

    2023 , eprint=

    Attention Is All You Need , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  3. [11]

    Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

    NASA. Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

  4. [12]

    and Savva, Manolis and Funkhouser, Thomas , title =

    Song, Shuran and Yu, Fisher and Zeng, Andy and Chang, Angel X. and Savva, Manolis and Funkhouser, Thomas , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

  5. [13]

    2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Semantickitti: A dataset for semantic scene understanding of lidar sequences , author=. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2019 , organization=

    2019

  6. [14]

    SSCBench: Monocular 3D semantic scene completion benchmark in street views , author=

  7. [15]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Monoscene: Monocular 3d semantic scene completion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  8. [16]

    European conference on computer vision , pages=

    Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unprojecting to 3d , author=. European conference on computer vision , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  9. [17]

    International journal of computer vision , volume=

    A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms , author=. International journal of computer vision , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  10. [18]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Vggt: Visual geometry grounded transformer , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  11. [19]

    and Frahm, Jan-Michael , title =

    Schonberger, Johannes L. and Frahm, Jan-Michael , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

  12. [20]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Dust3r: Geometric 3d vision made easy , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  13. [21]

    European conference on computer vision , pages=

    Grounding image matching in 3d with mast3r , author=. European conference on computer vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  14. [22]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Panda: Towards panoramic depth anything with unlabeled panoramas and mobius spatial augmentation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  15. [23]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  16. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.10647 , year=

    Depth anything 3: Recovering the visual space from any views , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.10647 , year=

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Thirteenth International Conference on 3D Vision , year=

    Mapanything: Universal feed-forward metric 3d reconstruction , author=. Thirteenth International Conference on 3D Vision , year=

  18. [26]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Moge-2: Accurate monocular geometry with metric scale and sharp details , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  19. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.15195 , year =

    Wang, Jianyuan and Chen, Minghao and Zhang, Shangzhan and Karaev, Nikita and Sch. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.15195 , year =

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Tri-perspective view for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  21. [29]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Voxformer: Sparse voxel transformer for camera-based 3d semantic scene completion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  22. [30]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Occformer: Dual-path transformer for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  23. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13959 , year=

    Bridging stereo geometry and BEV representation with reliable mutual interaction for semantic scene completion , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13959 , year=

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , pages=

    DepthSSC: Monocular 3D semantic scene completion via depth-spatial alignment and voxel adaptation , author=. 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , pages=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

  25. [33]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Context and geometry aware voxel transformer for semantic scene completion , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  26. [34]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Not all voxels are equal: Hardness-aware semantic scene completion with self-distillation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  27. [35]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Three cars approaching within 100m! enhancing distant geometry by tri-axis voxel scanning for camera-based semantic scene completion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  28. [36]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Hierarchical temporal context learning for camera-based semantic scene completion , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  29. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , volume=

    Instance-aware monocular 3d semantic scene completion , author=. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  30. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15670 , year=

    Symphonize 3d semantic scene completion with contextual instance queries , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15670 , year=

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    VLScene: Vision-language guidance distillation for camera-based 3D semantic scene completion , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  32. [40]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Sgformer: Satellite-ground fusion for 3d semantic scene completion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  33. [41]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Voxdet: Rethinking 3d semantic scene completion as dense object detection , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10104 , year=

    Dinov3 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10104 , year=

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Towards 3D object-centric feature learning for semantic scene completion , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  36. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.11130 , year=

    Fast-FoundationStereo: Real-Time Zero-Shot Stereo Matching , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.11130 , year=

  37. [45]

    Proceedings of the ieee/cvf winter conference on applications of computer vision , pages=

    Mobilestereonet: Towards lightweight deep networks for stereo matching , author=. Proceedings of the ieee/cvf winter conference on applications of computer vision , pages=

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.