Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 76 references

Construction of an analytic multi-component accretion environment and its application to Kerr black hole imaging

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A fully analytic superposition of disk, bumps, and spots reproduces the Kerr critical curve and generates multiple bright spots and Doppler-boosted arcs, providing a fast route for black-hole image modeling.

desk verdict A clean and flexible analytic toolkit for multi-component accretion imaging; the abstract overreaches by calling model-built features 'novel Kerr signatures,' but the framework itself is sound and useful. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08520 v1 pith:JVQHZZPK submitted 2026-08-09 gr-qc

Shiyang Hu , Dan Li , Chen Deng , Kejian He , Guansheng He This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C10
keywords blackholeimaginganalyticaccretionmodelKerrspacetimeraytracingradiativetransferDopplerboostingshadowdisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that a purely geometric, fully analytic accretion environment—a thick disk, Gaussian ring-like bumps, and localized Gaussian spots—can reproduce and extend the black-hole imaging phenomenology that usually requires costly numerical simulations. Applying this model to Kerr spacetime through ray tracing with radiative transfer, the authors show that it reproduces known features (the critical curve and the inner shadow) while generating new ones: multiple bright spots, teardrop- and crescent-shaped images, and arc-like structures produced by Doppler boosting. If this is right, synthetic black-hole images with complex, time-variable emission can be generated quickly over large parameter spaces, offering a practical route for interpreting transient high-energy events from image morphology alone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the multi-component emissivity $j_\nu = j_0[j_1 j_d + j_2 j_b + j_3 j_s]$ and the matching absorption $\alpha_\nu = \alpha_0[\alpha_1 \alpha_d + \alpha_2 \alpha_b + \alpha_3 \alpha_s]$. The disk term $j_d$ is a power-law radial decay with a vertical Gaussian profile, a flaring parameter, and an effective-radius construction that creates an emission plateau; the bump term $j_b$ is a Gaussian in radius and polar angle; the spot term $j_s$ is a triaxial Gaussian in $(r,\theta,\varphi)$ with a periodicity-corrected azimuthal form. The dynamics are supplied by a ZAMO tetrad four-velocity built from a prescribed radial power-law infall and a rotation profile with inner suppression, entering the images through the redshift factor in the covariant radiative-transfer equation and producing the Doppler asymmetries. This machinery lets each component be adjusted independently and combined additively in the emission and absorption coefficients.

What would settle it

Take a time-dependent GRMHD simulation snapshot containing a known flaring region, fit the model's disk, bump, and spot parameters to its emission, and compare the predicted image with the GRMHD image computed using full radiative transfer; if the multiple bright spots and arc structures do not appear at matching positions and brightness contrasts, the model's emission and velocity prescriptions are not capturing the flow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stated in the authors' own terms, the central discovery is that a fully analytic superposition of a thick disk, Gaussian ring-like bumps, and localized Gaussian spots—with absorption following the same analytic forms—is flexible enough to qualitatively mimic high-energy phenomena around black holes, and that applying it to Kerr spacetime produces images that validate the model. In those images the critical curve remains visible, the inner shadow appears or is erased depending on disk thickness, and the bump and spot components generate multiple bright spots, teardrop- and crescent-shaped direct images, lensed arcs, and an Einstein ring configuration when a spot is favourably positioned. The Doppler boost from the prescribed velocity field makes these features asymmetric, concentrating brightness into arc-like structures on one side of the critical curve, which the authors identify as signatures rarely seen in single-disk simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the prescribed velocity field—radial power-law infall, no vertical motion, and a rotation profile artificially suppressed near the horizon—approximates real accretion flows; if the true flow near the event horizon differs, the Doppler-boosted arcs and asymmetric spots that the paper highlights would shift or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The model reproduces the Kerr critical curve at all tested inclinations and recovers the known result that a geometrically thick disk makes the observable shadow boundary approach the critical curve, while a thin disk reveals an inner shadow.
  • With the Gaussian bump alone, the simulated images show a lensed bright ring, mushroom- or cap-shaped structures, and multiple bright spots whose positions track the bump radius and thickness.
  • A localized spot produces compact, stretched, teardrop, crescent, or ring-like images depending on its position and size, and can attach to the critical curve, appear inside the shadow, or form an Einstein ring.
  • Because the entire construction is analytic, parameter-space exploration of disk thickness, plateau, bumps, and spots is fast enough for systematic image surveys, unlike full GRMHD simulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the velocity field is parameterized but not derived, the model could be inverted against observed flare movies to estimate the radial-infall and rotation parameters; that inversion is not performed in this paper.
  • The paper's note that its observer-to-coordinate mapping is Kerr-specific implies that porting the model to wormholes or other compact objects requires re-deriving that map, since the offsets only vanish at large observer distance.
  • A natural next test is whether the multi-spot and arc signatures are degenerate with spin and inclination; if they are, component parameters inferred from a single image may not be unique.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a purely geometric, analytic multi-component accretion environment for black hole imaging, consisting of a geometrically thick disk with a radial plateau, a Gaussian ring-like bump, and localized Gaussian spots, together with a parametric velocity field prescribed in the ZAMO frame. The authors implement ray-tracing and covariant radiative transfer in Kerr spacetime, generating synthetic images for a wide range of model parameters and viewing geometries (Figs. 11-17). They argue that the model is flexible enough to qualitatively mimic high-energy astrophysical events and that the images reveal 'novel observational signatures of Kerr black holes,' including multiple bright spots and arc-like structures.

Significance. The model is simple, modular, and analytic, offering a fast route for exploring the image-space consequences of complex emission geometries; this could be a useful complement to computationally expensive GRMHD simulations for synthetic image generation and parameter-space scans. The paper includes a large number of illustrative images and sensible physical interpretations of the resulting morphologies. However, the claimed 'novel signatures' are not independent predictions: they are direct consequences of the ad hoc emissivity and velocity profiles, and the validation is only qualitative. The paper would be significantly strengthened by robustness tests against alternative velocity laws and by a quantitative validation step. With those revisions, the model could become a useful addition to the black-hole imaging toolkit.

major comments (2)
  1. [Secs. 2.2 and 3.3] The headline claim of 'novel observational signatures of Kerr black holes,' including multiple bright spots and arc-like structures (Abstract; Sec. 4), is not supported as stated because the features depend on the prescribed velocity field, Eqs. (2.20)-(2.21), through the redshift factor g in Eq. (3.32). The radial and azimuthal velocity laws are assumptions rather than solutions of the geodesic or GRMHD equations, and \hat v^\theta is set to zero. The bright arc in Fig. 11 and the additional Doppler-induced bright spots in Fig. 15 could shift or disappear under a different plausible velocity profile, such as a Keplerian rotation law or a geodesic plunging inflow. Please either (a) test the robustness of these features against several velocity models and report the parameter ranges where they persist, or (b) reframe the conclusions so that these are presented as features of this particular model rather than properties of the Kerr spacetime itself.
  2. [Secs. 3.3.2 and 4] The paper repeatedly states that the results 'validate the effectiveness of our accretion model' (Abstract; Sec. 4). The actual validation in Sec. 3.3.2 is qualitative: it checks that the critical curve is reproduced and that the images show the expected thick-disk and ring morphologies. No quantitative comparison to GRMHD images, to EHT observations, or to known analytic limits is provided, and the image series in Figs. 11-17 are not accompanied by quantitative diagnostics such as flux profiles, image similarity metrics, or radial brightness distributions. The conclusion of 'systematically validating the effectiveness of our model' is therefore stronger than the evidence presented. Please either add a quantitative validation step or soften the claim to state that the model reproduces known qualitative features and can be used as a flexible toy model for exploring complex emission geometries.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2.18)] The expression u^\theta = \Gamma \hat v^\theta / g_{\theta\theta} is inconsistent with the tetrad basis (2.8)-(2.11); it should be \Gamma \hat v^\theta / \sqrt{g_{\theta\theta}}. The error is numerically harmless in this paper because \hat v^\theta is set to zero, but it should be corrected so that the general axisymmetric framework is sound.
  2. [Abstract and text] The abstract contains a spacing error: 'accretionincurvedspacetimes' should read 'accretion in curved spacetimes.' In addition, the caption of Fig. 2 begins 'Here, We fix' with a capital 'W' that should be lowercase. Please proofread the manuscript for such typographical issues.
  3. [Reproducibility] No code or data are released. Given that the paper's main deliverable is a computational tool for generating synthetic images, the absence of code or data files makes it difficult for other groups to reproduce the figures or extend the model. A public code repository or a release of the image data would substantially improve the paper's utility.
  4. [Figs. 11-17] The color bars are normalized differently across panels and figures, and the text does not always state the normalization convention. This makes quantitative comparisons of brightness across panels difficult. Please specify whether the images are normalized to the maximum intensity of each panel or to a global scale, and state this consistently in all figure captions.
  5. [Eq. (2.5) and footnote 1] The spot emissivity in Eq. (2.5) uses (\phi - \phi_s)^2, which is not 2\pi-periodic, while the footnote states that the implementation uses 1 - \cos(\phi - \phi_s) instead. This discrepancy is confusing; please incorporate the periodic form directly into Eq. (2.5) or clearly explain in the main text that the quadratic form is an approximation valid away from the \phi=0 boundary.
  6. [Sec. 3.2.3] The 'global rotation approximation' is introduced without a quantitative justification for applying the same velocity law to all components (disk, bump, spot). Please clarify what this approximation means physically, for example whether it corresponds to a common angular momentum transfer mechanism, and discuss its limitations when the components represent different physical phenomena.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the accretion environment is an openly phenomenological construction, and the image features are computed outputs of the stated emissivity and velocity inputs together with Kerr lensing, not fitted data relabeled as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central object is an explicitly parametric model, not a claim to derive emission from first principles. Equations (2.1)-(2.5) define the emissivity as a superposition of disk, Gaussian bump, and localized spot components, and Eqs. (2.20)-(2.21) prescribe the velocity field; these are stated assumptions, not hidden fits. The ray-tracing and radiative transfer procedure of Sec. 3.3.1 is standard and self-contained, and the simulated images are genuine outputs of that computation: for example, the multiple images of a single localized spot arise from gravitational lensing in Kerr, not simply from copying the input emissivity onto the image plane. The bright spots and arcs in Figs. 13-15 are explicitly attributed to the inclusion of jb and js and to Doppler effects, so the paper does not mislabel an input as an independent prediction. Validation relies on external results (the critical curve and inner shadow, citing [43,71]), and the authors' prior works are cited only for context and are not load-bearing for the model construction. The dependence of the Doppler features on the prescribed velocity law is a modeling limitation or robustness concern, but it is not circularity because the velocity law is explicitly displayed and not inferred from the images. No self-definitional reduction, fitted-input prediction, or self-citation chain was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 22 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's 17 structural parameters plus 4 velocity parameters are all set by hand; no fitting to EHT data or GRMHD snapshots is performed, and no error budget is given. The resulting images are illustrative of what the chosen functions produce, not predictions grounded in plasma physics. No new physical entities are introduced; the Gaussian bumps and spots are parameterized emission profiles, not new fields or particles.

free parameters (22)
  • p1 = -1.5 (most simulations)
    Radial decay exponent of disk emission; set by hand, not fitted to data.
  • p2 = -0.5 (most simulations)
    Quadratic radial decay exponent; chosen to shape the emission profile.
  • sigma_dtheta = 0.01 to 0.25 (Figure 11)
    Disk thickness parameter; varied to show its effect on shadow and image brightness.
  • beta = 0.1 (most simulations)
    Disk flaring rate; hand-chosen.
  • r_p = 1.5 (plateau position, most simulations)
    Position of the emission plateau; hand-chosen.
  • w_p = 3 (plateau width, most simulations)
    Width of the emission plateau; hand-chosen.
  • j_p = 1 (plateau strength, most simulations)
    Strength coefficient of the plateau; hand-chosen.
  • r_b = 6, 10, 15 (bump positions, Fig. 13)
    Radial position of the Gaussian bump; varied to show effect.
  • sigma_br = 0.5 (bump radial width, Fig. 13)
    Radial width of the Gaussian bump; hand-chosen.
  • sigma_btheta = 0.1 (bump angular width, Fig. 13)
    Angular width of the Gaussian bump; hand-chosen.
  • r_s = 10 (spot radius, Fig. 15)
    Radial position of the localized spot; hand-chosen.
  • theta_s = pi/2 (spot polar angle, Fig. 15)
    Polar angle of the spot; hand-chosen.
  • phi_s = pi (spot azimuth, Fig. 15)
    Azimuthal angle of the spot; hand-chosen.
  • sigma_sr = 0.5 to 3 (spot radial size, Fig. 15)
    Radial size of the spot; varied to show morphology changes.
  • sigma_stheta = pi/36 (spot angular size, Fig. 15)
    Polar size of the spot; hand-chosen.
  • sigma_sphi = pi/30 (spot azimuthal size, Fig. 15)
    Azimuthal size of the spot; hand-chosen.
  • V_max = 0.9 (maximum radial velocity)
    Maximum radial velocity of the accretion flow; hand-chosen.
  • p3 = 0.5 (radial acceleration exponent)
    Controls acceleration rate of radial infall; hand-chosen.
  • psi = 0.9 (rotation speed)
    Sets overall rotational speed of the material; hand-chosen.
  • lambda = 10 (rotation suppression, Fig. 10 and simulations)
    Regulates suppression of rotation in the inner region; hand-chosen.
  • j1, j2, j3 (emission weights) = 1 (not explicitly varied in results)
    Relative weights of disk, bump, and spot emission; set to equal in the shown simulations.
  • alpha0, alpha1, alpha2, alpha3 (absorption weights) = Not specified in simulations
    Control optical thickness; the paper says setting alpha0=0 gives optically thin limit, but the image simulations do not state the exact values used.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Kerr metric describes the central black hole.
    The paper uses the Kerr line element (3.1) as the fixed background for ray tracing.
  • domain assumption The plasma is optically thin near the event horizon.
    Section 3.1 sets rin = reh, citing [71] that millimeter-wavelength emission near low-luminosity SMBHs is optically thin.
  • ad hoc to paper The emissivity and absorption are prescribed by the analytic forms (2.1)-(2.5), not derived from radiative microphysics.
    This is the central geometric modeling choice of the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The velocity field is prescribed as in (2.20)-(2.21) with v_theta = 0.
    Doppler signatures in the images depend directly on this prescribed velocity field.
  • domain assumption The observer-frame to Boyer-Lindquist coordinate mapping (3.12)-(3.19) is approximately valid for asymptotically flat spacetimes.
    The paper itself notes in footnote 2 that the transformation is tailored for Kerr and may introduce offsets in other spacetimes, but is negligible for large r_obs.
  • standard math The radiative transfer can be decoupled from frequency dependence by a single redshift factor with nu_obs = 1.
    Standard invariant formulation of covariant radiative transfer (Eqs. 3.31-3.34).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Construction of an analytic multi-component accretion environment and its application to Kerr black hole imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JVQHZZPK

@misc{pith2026260808520,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Construction of an analytic multi-component accretion environment and its application to Kerr black hole imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JVQHZZPK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08520}
}
read the original abstract

The construction of accretion environments is fundamental to black hole imaging. From a purely geometric perspective, we construct a novel analytic accretion environment comprising a geometrically thick disk, ring-like bumps with a Gaussian profile, and localized compact emission regions modeled by Gaussian distributions. This environment offers high flexibility, enabling independent adjustments of disk thickness, vertical structure, and the positions and morphologies of localized spots, thereby allowing it to qualitatively mimic high-energy astrophysical phenomena. Applying this model to the Kerr spacetime, we investigate the resulting images via radiative transfer and ray-tracing simulations. The results validate the effectiveness of our accretion model and reveal novel observational signatures of Kerr black holes under multi-component illumination, including multiple bright spots and arc-like structures. This work provides a convenient and fully analytic framework for modeling accretion in curved spacetimes, and offers a new perspective on inferring accretion mechanisms and transient high-energy processes from image features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) L1 [1906.11238]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,Astrophys. J. Lett.930(2022) L12

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Yuan and R

    F. Yuan and R. Narayan,Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52(2014) 529 [1401.0586]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Shakura and R.A

    N.I. Shakura and R.A. Sunyaev,Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance., Astron. Astrophys.24(1973) 337

    work page 1973

  5. [5]

    Page and K.S

    D.N. Page and K.S. Thorne,Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion Disk,Astrophys. J.191(1974) 499

    work page 1974

  6. [6]

    L.-X. Li, E.R. Zimmerman, R. Narayan and J.E. McClintock,Multitemperature Blackbody Spectrum of a Thin Accretion Disk around a Kerr Black Hole: Model Computations and Comparison with Observations,Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.157(2005) 335 [astro-ph/0411583]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Ichimaru,Bimodal behavior of accretion disks: theory and application to Cygnus X-1 transitions.,Astrophys

    S. Ichimaru,Bimodal behavior of accretion disks: theory and application to Cygnus X-1 transitions.,Astrophys. J.214(1977) 840

    work page 1977

  8. [8]

    Narayan and I

    R. Narayan and I. Yi,Advection-dominated Accretion: A Self-similar Solution,Astrophys. J. Lett.428(1994) L13 [astro-ph/9403052]

    arXiv 1994

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Narayan, I.V

    R. Narayan, I.V. Igumenshchev and M.A. Abramowicz,Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow,Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.55(2003) L69 [astro-ph/0305029]

    2003 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Akiyama, J.C

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, K. Akiyama, J.C. Algaba, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, R. Anantua et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon,Astrophys. J. Lett.910(2021) L13 [2105.01173]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    B. You, X. Cao, Z. Yan, J.-M. Hameury, B. Czerny, Y. Wu et al.,Observations of a black hole x-ray binary indicate formation of a magnetically arrested disk,Science381(2023) 961 [2309.00200]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Porth, K

    O. Porth, K. Chatterjee, R. Narayan, C.F. Gammie, Y. Mizuno, P. Anninos et al.,The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Code Comparison Project,Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.243(2019) 26 [1904.04923]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Falcke, F

    H. Falcke, F. Melia and E. Agol,Viewing the Shadow of the Black Hole at the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. Lett.528(2000) L13 [astro-ph/9912263]

    2000 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Narayan, M.D

    R. Narayan, M.D. Johnson and C.F. Gammie,The Shadow of a Spherically Accreting Black Hole,Astrophys. J. Lett.885(2019) L33 [1910.02957]. – 24 –

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Zeng, H.-Q

    X.-X. Zeng, H.-Q. Zhang and H. Zhang,Shadows and photon spheres with spherical accretions in the four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 872 [2004.12074]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    S. Wen, W. Hong and J. Tao,Observational appearances of magnetically charged black holes in Born-Infeld electrodynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 277 [2212.03021]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Guo, K.-J

    S. Guo, K.-J. He, G.-R. Li and G.-P. Li,The shadow and photon sphere of the charged black hole in Rastall gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 165013 [2205.07242]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Heydari-Fard, M

    M. Heydari-Fard, M. Heydari-Fard and N. Riazi,Shadows and photon rings of a spherically accreting Kehagias-Sfetsos black hole,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32(2023) 2350088 [2307.01529]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Gralla, D.E

    S.E. Gralla, D.E. Holz and R.M. Wald,Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 024018 [1906.00873]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    K.-J. He, S. Guo, S.-C. Tan and G.-P. Li,Shadow images and observed luminosity of the Bardeen black hole surrounded by different accretions *,Chin. Phys. C46(2022) 085106 [2103.13664]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Li and K.-J

    G.-P. Li and K.-J. He,Shadows and rings of the Kehagias-Sfetsos black hole surrounded by thin disk accretion,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.06(2021) 037 [2105.08521]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Zeng, G.-P

    X.-X. Zeng, G.-P. Li and K.-J. He,The shadows and observational appearance of a noncommutative black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretions,Nucl. Phys. B974 (2022) 115639 [2106.14478]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Zeng, K.-J

    X.-X. Zeng, K.-J. He and G.-P. Li,Effects of dark matter on shadows and rings of Brane-World black holes illuminated by various accretions,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65(2022) 290411 [2111.05090]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Li and K.-J

    G.-P. Li and K.-J. He,Observational appearances of a f(R) global monopole black hole illuminated by various accretions,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 1018

    2021

  17. [25]

    He, S.-C

    K.-J. He, S.-C. Tan and G.-P. Li,Influence of torsion charge on shadow and observation signature of black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretions,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 81

    2022

  18. [26]

    Zeng, K.-J

    X.-X. Zeng, K.-J. He, G.-P. Li, E.-W. Liang and S. Guo,QED and accretion flow models effect on optical appearance of Euler–Heisenberg black holes,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 764 [2209.05938]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Wu, E.-W

    B. Wu, E.-W. Liang and X. Zhang,Black hole images under spherical-shell and circular-annulus accretion models in Schwarzschild spacetime: a semianalytical approach,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 632 [2501.00361]

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    S. Hu, C. Deng, D. Li, X. Wu and E. Liang,Observational signatures of Schwarzschild-MOG black holes in scalar-tensor-vector gravity: shadows and rings with different accretions,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 885

    2022

  21. [29]

    J. Peng, M. Guo and X.-H. Feng,Observational signature and additional photon rings of an asymmetric thin-shell wormhole,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 124010 [2102.05488]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    J. Peng, M. Guo and X.-H. Feng,Influence of quantum correction on black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings,Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 085103 [2008.00657]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Meng, X.-J

    Y. Meng, X.-J. Wang, Y.-Z. Li and X.-M. Kuang,Effects of hair on the image of a rotating black hole illuminated by a thin accretion disk,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 627 [2501.02496]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    X.-J. Wang, Y. Meng, X.-M. Kuang and K. Liao,Distinguishing black holes with and without spontaneous scalarization in Einstein-scalar-Gauss–Bonnet theories via optical features,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1243 [2409.20200]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Meng, X.-M

    Y. Meng, X.-M. Kuang, X.-J. Wang, B. Wang and J.-P. Wu,Images from disk and spherical accretions of hairy Schwarzschild black holes,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 064013 [2306.10459]. – 25 –

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Wang, X.-M

    X.-J. Wang, X.-M. Kuang, Y. Meng, B. Wang and J.-P. Wu,Rings and images of Horndeski hairy black hole illuminated by various thin accretions,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 124052 [2304.10015]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Huang, J

    S. Huang, J. Chen and J. Yang,Image of a quantum-corrected black hole without Cauchy horizons illuminated by a static thin accretion disk,Phys. Lett. B878(2026) 140545 [2510.09956]

    2026 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Chen and J

    J. Chen and J. Yang,Shadows and optical appearance of quantum-corrected black holes illuminated by static thin accretions,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 512 [2503.06215]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    W. Zeng, Y. Ling, Q.-Q. Jiang and G.-P. Li,Accretion disk for regular black holes with sub-Planckian curvature,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 104072 [2308.00976]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Luminet,Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk.,Astron

    J.-P. Luminet,Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk.,Astron. Astrophys.75 (1979) 228

    1979

  31. [39]

    Tian and Z.-H

    S.X. Tian and Z.-H. Zhu,Testing the Schwarzschild metric in a strong field region with the Event Horizon Telescope,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 064011 [1908.11794]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. Hu, C. Deng, S. Guo, X. Wu and E. Liang,Observational signatures of Schwarzschild-MOG black holes in scalar–tensor–vector gravity: images of the accretion disk,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 264

    2023

  33. [41]

    Gyulchev, P

    G. Gyulchev, P. Nedkova, T. Vetsov and S. Yazadjiev,Image of the thin accretion disk around compact objects in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 885 [2106.14697]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    C. Liu, L. Tang and J. Jing,Image of the Schwarzschild black hole pierced by a cosmic string with a thin accretion disk,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31(2022) 2250041 [2109.01867]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Chael, M.D

    A. Chael, M.D. Johnson and A. Lupsasca,Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon,Astrophys. J.918(2021) 6 [2106.00683]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    S. Hu, D. Li, C. Deng, X. Wu and E. Liang,Influences of tilted thin accretion disks on the observational appearance of hairy black holes in Horndeski gravity,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04(2024) 089 [2309.10557]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    D. Li, S. Hu, C. Deng and X. Wu,Observational Features of Deformed Schwarzschild Black Holes Illuminated by an Accretion Disk with Anisotropic Emissions,Fortschr. Phys.74(2026) 70062 [2409.01778]

    2026 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Y. Hou, Z. Zhang, H. Yan, M. Guo and B. Chen,Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 064058 [2206.13744]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Hou and M. Guo,Observational signatures of rotating black holes in the semiclassical gravity with trace anomaly*,Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 085106 [2305.14924]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Li, H.-B

    G.-P. Li, H.-B. Zheng, K.-J. He and Q.-Q. Jiang,The shadow and observational images of the non-singular rotating black holes in loop quantum gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 249 [2410.17295]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Zeng, C.-Y

    X.-X. Zeng, C.-Y. Yang, M.I. Aslam and R. Saleem,Probing Horndeski gravity via Kerr black hole: Insights from thin accretion disks and shadows with EHT observations,J. High Energy Astrophys.51(2026) 100540 [2509.05803]

    2026 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zeng, C.-Y

    X.-X. Zeng, C.-Y. Yang and H. Yu,Optical characteristics of the Kerr–Bertotti–Robinson black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1242 [2508.03020]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    X. Wang, S. Chen, M. Guo and B. Chen,Semianalytical study on polarized images of a black hole due to frame dragging,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 024033 [2508.15178]

    2026 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Q. Wan, Y. Hou, Y. Huang, P.-C. Li, M. Guo and B. Chen,Distorting Kerr Images with Parity-Odd Scalar Hair,2605.28376. – 26 –

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    F. Zhou, J. Huang, Y. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, M. Guo et al.,Nonthermal Synchrotron Emission and Polarization Signatures during Black Hole Flux Eruptions,Astrophys. J.1002(2026) 152 [2512.06803]

    2026 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Yang, K.-J

    C.-Y. Yang, K.-J. He, X.-X. Zeng and L.-F. Li,Observational signatures and polarized images of rotating charged black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 520 [2508.07393]

    2026 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Y. Hou, J. Huang, M. Guo, Y. Mizuno and B. Chen,Near-horizon Polarization as a Diagnostic of Black Hole Spacetime,Astrophys. J. Lett.988(2025) L51 [2409.07248]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Huang, L

    J. Huang, L. Zheng, M. Guo and B. Chen,Coport: a new public code for polarized radiative transfer in a covariant framework,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.11(2024) 054 [2407.10431]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, Z. Hu, M. Guo and B. Chen,Polarized images of charged particles in vortical motions around a magnetized Kerr black hole,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.03(2024) 013 [2304.03642]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    X.-X. Zeng, H. Ye, M.I. Aslam and R. Saleem,Shadows and Polarization Images of a Four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole Irradiated by a Thick Accretion Disk,2603.07185

  51. [59]

    Aslam, R

    M.I. Aslam, R. Saleem, C.-Y. Yang and X.-X. Zeng,Imprints of dark matter on the shadow and polarization images of a black hole illuminated by various thick disks,J. High Energy Astrophys.51(2026) 100551 [2512.00964]

    2026

  52. [60]

    X. Wang, H. Ye and X.-X. Zeng,Imaging and polarization patterns of various thick disks around Kerr-MOG black holes,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.05(2026) 057 [2511.09379]

    2026

  53. [61]

    Zeng, C.-Y

    X.-X. Zeng, C.-Y. Yang, M.I. Aslam and R. Saleem,Probing non-rotating black hole in Kalb–Ramond gravity: imaging and polarized signatures surrounded by different thick accretion flows,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 383 [2511.00586]

    2026

  54. [62]

    Chatterjee, Z

    K. Chatterjee, Z. Younsi, M. Liska, A. Tchekhovskoy, S.B. Markoff, D. Yoon et al., Observational signatures of disc and jet misalignment in images of accreting black holes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.499(2020) 362 [2002.08386]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    White, J

    C.J. White, J. Dexter, O. Blaes and E. Quataert,The Effects of Tilt on the Images of Black Hole Accretion Flows,Astrophys. J.894(2020) 14 [2001.02361]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    S. Hu, D. Li and C. Deng,Novel inner shadows of the Kerr black hole with a tilted thin accretion disk,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.06(2025) 036 [2410.09445]

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    S. Hu, D. Li, C. Deng and K. He,Reshaping the inner shadow of a Kerr black hole by a torn accretion disk,2604.20499

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Cunha, C.A.R

    P.V.P. Cunha, C.A.R. Herdeiro, E. Radu and H.F. Runarsson,Shadows of Kerr black holes with and without scalar hair,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25(2016) 1641021 [1605.08293]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    M. Wang, S. Chen and J. Jing,Kerr black hole shadows in Melvin magnetic field with stable photon orbits,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 084021 [2104.12304]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    W. Cao, W. Liu and W.-F. Liu,Parameter constraints from shadows of Kerr–Newman-dS black holes with cloud strings and quintessence,Gen. Rel. Grav.55(2023) 120 [2304.12644]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    M., A.-V.J

    V.-C.J. M., A.-V.J. A., F.D. Lora-Clavijo, O.M. Pimentel and O.-V.J. E,OSIRIS: a new code for ray tracing around compact objects,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 103 [2202.00086]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Zhong, Z

    Z. Zhong, Z. Hu, H. Yan, M. Guo and B. Chen,QED effects on Kerr black hole shadows immersed in uniform magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 104028 [2108.06140]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Bronzwaer and H

    T. Bronzwaer and H. Falcke,The Nature of Black Hole Shadows,Astrophys. J.920(2021) 155 [2108.03966]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    X. Wu, Y. Wang, W. Sun and F. Liu,Construction of Explicit Symplectic Integrators in General Relativity. IV. Kerr Black Holes,Astrophys. J.914(2021) 63 [2106.12356]. – 27 –

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    H.-Y. Pu, K. Yun, Z. Younsi and S.-J. Yoon,Odyssey: A Public GPU-Based Code for General-Relativistic Radiative Transfer in Kerr Spacetime,Astrophys. J.820(2016) 105 [1601.02063]

    2016 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Kawashima, K

    T. Kawashima, K. Toma, M. Kino, K. Akiyama, M. Nakamura and K. Moriyama,A Jet-bases Emission Model of the EHT2017 Image of M87*,Astrophys. J.909(2021) 168 [2009.08641]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Papoutsis, M

    E. Papoutsis, M. Bauböck, D. Chang and C.F. Gammie,Jets and Rings in Images of Spinning Black Holes,Astrophys. J.944(2023) 55 [2212.06281]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, M. Guo and B. Chen,Imaging thick accretion disks and jets surrounding black holes,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.05(2024) 032 [2401.14794]. – 28 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.