Overlap distribution of the critical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model

Brice Huang; Hang Du

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 61 references

Overlap distribution of the critical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At criticality, both Ising and spherical SK overlaps have scale $N^{-1/3}$ and converge to an explicit Airy$_1$-point-process random measure.

desk verdict A likely-correct answer to Talagrand's critical-overlap question, but the main theorem leans on estimates living in an unpublished companion; referee it seriously and require that companion to be verifiable. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08752 v1 pith:E7UTZKXI submitted 2026-08-09 math.PR cond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.MP

Hang Du , Brice Huang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRcond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.MP MSC 82B4460K3560B2082B27

keywords SKmodelsphericaloverlapdistributioncriticaltemperatureAiry_1pointprocessGOEspectraledge2-Wassersteinconvergencesphere-to-cubecomparison

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that at the critical inverse temperature $\beta=1$, the two-replica overlap $R_{1,2}$ in both the Ising and spherical Sherrington–Kirkpatrick models fluctuates on scale $N^{-1/3}$. The quenched distribution of $N^{1/3}R_{1,2}$ — the random probability measure one sees after averaging over the disorder — converges, in the 2-Wasserstein metric, to an explicit random probability measure built from a realization of the reflected Airy$_1$ point process. The same object gives the sharp second-moment asymptotics $N^{2/3}\mathbb{E}\langle R_{1,2}^2\rangle\to\mathbb{E}_\chi V_a(\chi)>0$, answering Talagrand's Conjecture 11.7.5. A reader should care because this is the first exact description of the critical overlap law for the original SK model, tying spin-glass criticality to the GOE spectral edge.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the random probability measure $\mathfrak{P}_{a(\chi)}$. For a realization $\chi=(\chi_k)_{k\ge1}$ of the reflected Airy$_1$ point process, set $d_k=\chi_k-\chi_1$ and define $\Delta(\chi)$ as the unique positive zero of $\Psi(x;\chi)=1/(x+\Xi(\chi))+\sum_{k\ge2}(1/(x+d_k)-1/d_k)$, with $a_k=(\Delta(\chi)+d_k)^{-1}$. The measure $\nu_a$ is the law of independent standard Gaussians $g_k$ conditioned on the constraint $\sum_k a_k(g_k^2-1)=0$, constructed rigorously via projectively consistent finite-dimensional pins; two independent samples give $Q_a=\sum_k a_k g_k^{(1)}g_k^{(2)}$, and $\mathfrak{P}_a=\mathrm{Law}(Q_a)$. This object carries the argument because the spherical Gibbs measure is exactly such a pin with coefficients $a_{N,k}=N^{-2/3}(\gamma-\lambda_k)^{-1}$; the reflected Airy$_1$ edge scaling of GOE eigenvalues (1.2) turns the finite pins into $\mathfrak{P}_{a(\chi)}$.

What would settle it

Simulate the spherical model at large $N$: diagonalize a GOE matrix, sample the anisotropic Gaussian conditioned on $\|\boldsymbol{\xi}\|^2=N$, and measure the 2-Wasserstein distance between the empirical law of $N^{1/3}R_{1,2}$ and the predicted $\mathfrak{P}_{a(\chi)}$; if the distance does not tend to zero, or $N^{2/3}\mathbb{E}\langle R_{1,2}^2\rangle^{\mathrm{sph}}$ drifts from $\mathbb{E}_\chi V_a(\chi)$, the central claim is false. A standalone simulation of the reflected Airy$_1$ point process gives a concrete numerical value for the limit to compare against.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1: for both the Ising and the spherical SK model at $\beta=1$, as $N\to\infty$, the law of the quenched random probability measure $\langle\delta(N^{1/3}R_{1,2})\rangle$ converges in the 2-Wasserstein metric $\mathcal{W}_2$ to the law of $\mathfrak{P}_{a(\chi)}$, an explicit random probability measure measurable with respect to a realization $\chi$ of the reflected Airy$_1$ point process. The companion Corollary 1.2 identifies the limit of $N^{2/3}\mathbb{E}\langle R_{1,2}^2\rangle$ with $\mathbb{E}_\chi V_a(\chi)$, settling Talagrand's Conjecture 11.7.5. For the spherical model the proof is a direct random-matrix calculation: the Gibbs measure is an anisotropic Gaussian conditioned on $\|\boldsymbol{x}\|^2=N$, and the overlap becomes a pinning of GOE edge eigenvectors. For the Ising model the proof is a sphere-to-cube transfer: the quenched overlap distributions of the two models asymptotically coincide, so the explicit spherical limit carries over.

Load-bearing premise

The Ising result rests on the companion bounds of [DH26]: $\mathbb{E}[(Z_N/Z_N^{\mathrm{sph}}-1)^2]=O(N^{-1/3})$, exponential tails for $N^{1/3}R_{1,2}$, and a local density comparison; if any of these fail, the sphere-to-cube comparison of Theorem 1.9 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At $\beta=1$ the overlap $R_{1,2}$ fluctuates on scale $N^{-1/3}$, and its quenched law is non-Gaussian and random for both the Ising and spherical SK models.
The sharp constant in Talagrand's Conjecture 11.7.5 is identified as $\mathbb{E}_\chi V_a(\chi)$, a positive, explicitly defined number, instead of the previous $N^{-2/3}$ order-of-magnitude bound.
The critical Ising and spherical SK models share the same asymptotic quenched overlap law, so the previously mysterious Ising overlap is now controlled by the GOE spectral edge.
For the spherical model, the same proof adapts throughout the critical window $\beta_N=1+bN^{-1/3}$, with $\Delta_b$ the root of $\Psi(\Delta_b)=b$, interpolating from Gaussian to bimodal overlap laws.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's own limitation is that the sphere-to-cube transfer is proved only at $\beta=1$; for $\beta_N=1+bN^{-1/3}$ with $b>0$, the authors state the proof breaks down, so the Ising analogue of the critical-window interpolation remains an open prediction.
The same conditioning construction should apply to other spherical-model observables, such as $k$-replica overlaps or linear statistics of the pinned Gaussian field, yielding further Airy$_1$-type limits beyond $R_{1,2}$.
A direct numerical evaluation of $\mathbb{E}_\chi V_a(\chi)$ from simulated reflected Airy$_1$ point processes would pin down the limiting constant, providing a sharp test of the finite-$N$ convergence and its rate.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, this is the first explicit characterization of the critical overlap distribution in both the Ising and spherical SK models at beta=1, with scale N^{-1/3} and a limit built from the reflected Airy_1 point process. It also gives the constant in the N^{2/3} second-moment asymptotics, resolving Talagrand's Conjecture 11.7.5. That is a real result. Second, the load-bearing wall is not all in this paper: several key estimates—the ratio bound E[(X_N-1)^2]=O(N^{-1/3}), the exponential tails in Proposition 3.2, and the local density comparison in (3.9)—are imported from the companion [DH26], which is cited but not proved here. If those estimates are solid, the sphere-to-cube transfer likely works; if [DH26] is not available at review time, no referee can verify Theorem 1.1(a). The stress-test note is right, and I'd add that even the spherical part borrows Proposition 3.2 for relative compactness, so this is not just an Ising-transfer concern.

The paper deserves credit where it is earned. The spherical derivation is coherent: GOE edge spectrum, the saddle equation, the pinned Gaussian measure, and the Airy_1 limit form a natural chain. Section 2's construction of the conditioned infinite-dimensional Gaussian measure is genuine work and looks correct. The Hilbert-space embedding in Section 3 is a clean way to upgrade annealed convergence to quenched convergence. The citation pattern is not abusive: the authors cite their own companion because that is where the quoted estimates live, and the overlap limit is constructed from the Airy process, not fitted to overlap data.

The soft spots are proportionate. The paper openly states that most formal arguments were generated by GPT-5.6 Pro. That alone is not a mathematical defect, and the specific attribution of the Hilbert-space idea to the model is honest. But it does raise the verification burden: the proof chain is long, there is no machine-checking, and the companion is unpublished. I would not desk-reject on AI use, but I would want the companion posted in a form referees can check, and I would want the authors to explicitly confirm which steps in this paper were human-verified.

Who is this for? Spin glass and random matrix people, definitely. It answers a named conjecture and gives a concrete limiting object that will be cited. A serious referee gets real value from engaging with this. My recommendation: send it to peer review, but make acceptance conditional on the companion being available and the AI-generated steps receiving human verification. The scientific claim is likely correct, but the current verification burden is too high for an unconditional acceptance.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the quenched law of the two-replica overlap R_{1,2} in the Ising and spherical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick models at the critical inverse temperature β=1. The main results, Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2, assert that N^{1/3}R_{1,2} converges in a Wasserstein sense to an explicit random probability measure built from the reflected Airy_1 point process, and that N^{2/3}E< R_{1,2}^2 > converges to an explicit Airy-functional, resolving Talagrand's Conjecture 11.7.5. For the spherical model, the proof proceeds by representing the Gibbs measure as a norm-constrained Gaussian in an eigenbasis of the GOE matrix and passing to the Airy_1 edge scaling; for the Ising model, the proof invokes a sphere-to-cube comparison principle that transfers the spherical limit to the Ising overlap law. The paper is self-contained in its construction of the limiting object (Section 2) and in the spherical edge convergence (Section 4), but several load-bearing estimates are cited from the authors' unpublished companion paper [DH26].

Significance. If the result is correct, it gives a fully explicit non-Gaussian, quenched limit for the critical two-replica overlap and resolves a conjecture stated by Talagrand. The construction of 𝜓_a(χ) as the law of a bilinear form under an infinite-dimensional pinned Gaussian distribution is elegant, and the paper gives a satisfying random-matrix interpretation of the spherical SK overlap in terms of GOE edge eigenvalues and inverse gaps. The proof is genuinely constructive: the limiting law has no fitted parameters, and the finite-N identification for the spherical model, Lemma 4.5, is a clean exact identity. The main limitation is verifiability: the transfer to the Ising model, and even parts of the spherical argument, rest on estimates from the unpublished companion [DH26]. Subject to those estimates being supplied or made available, the paper would be a substantial contribution to the critical spin-glass literature.

major comments (2)

[§1.3, §3] Theorem 1.9 and hence Theorem 1.1(a) depend on four imported estimates from the unpublished companion [DH26]: the partition-function ratio bound E[(X_N-1)^2]=O(N^{-1/3}) from [DH26, Theorem 1.6], the exponential tail estimates quoted as Proposition 3.2, the local density comparison (3.9) quoted from [DH26, Lemma 3.9], and the uniform annealed bound (3.10) attributed to [DH26, Propositions 3.1-3.2]. These are precisely the estimates that transfer the spherical overlap law to the Ising model: X_N→1 in probability and the tails are used to pass from the annealed comparison (1.12) to the quenched comparison (1.11) and then to Wasserstein-2 convergence. Since [DH26] is not available to the reader and the present paper does not prove or even fully restate these results, the central claim (a) is not independently checkable from the manuscript.
[§3, Lemma 3.3; §4, Proposition 1.8] The spherical result Theorem 1.1(b) also relies on the companion estimates. In Lemma 3.3, relative compactness of the laws of the quenched overlap measures uses the exponential tail bound from Proposition 3.2, which is cited to [DH26]. In Proposition 1.8, finiteness of Eχ V_a(χ) uses the spherical exponential moment bound from Proposition 3.2 through the estimate on E V_{a_N} in (4.21). Thus even the spherical convergence is conditional on [DH26]. The paper should either include proofs of these estimates, state them with full hypotheses and dependencies, or provide a public version of [DH26] so that the verification burden can be discharged.

minor comments (3)

[§3, Lemma 3.3] The assertion that a closed ball in the fourth-moment Wasserstein metric is compact in the 2-Wasserstein metric is stated without proof; a short justification via Prokhorov's theorem plus uniform integrability of second moments would improve readability.
[§1.3] The sentence crediting an 'idea due to GPT-5.6 Pro' is informal for a mathematical proof section; such acknowledgments are better placed in the acknowledgments or in the AI-use disclosure rather than in the proof outline.
[§1.5, organization] The paper would benefit from an explicit table or list of which results are proved here and which are imported from [DH26], especially because the reader may otherwise have difficulty tracking the verification status of assumptions used later.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Airy_1 limit law is derived from a saddle equation and GOE edge data; the Ising transfer rests on independent companion estimates, not on the target conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The limiting law in Theorem 1.1 is constructed from the reflected Airy_1 point process via the saddle equation (1.3)/(1.7), not fitted to overlap data: a(chi) is the almost-sure root of Psi(.; chi), and P_a(chi) is defined by conditioning an independent Gaussian sequence on a null constraint (Definitions 1.5 and 1.7). For the spherical model, Lemma 4.5 identifies the finite-Gibbs overlap law exactly with the finite Gaussian pin P_{a_N}, and Proposition 4.1 transfers the GOE edge convergence to the coefficients; no overlap measurement enters the limiting object. For the Ising model, Theorem 1.1(a) is obtained from Theorem 1.9 plus Theorem 1.1(b), and Theorem 1.9 is a genuine comparison theorem rather than a restatement: the annealed difference is bounded using the quoted [DH26] estimates, then upgraded to the quenched statement via the Hilbert-space embedding of Section 3.2. The main deferred ingredients are [DH26, Theorem 1.6], Proposition 3.2 (= [DH26, Theorem 1.4(a), Corollary 1.7(b)]), and [DH26, Lemma 3.9]. These are self-citations, but they are parameter-free estimates about X_N, exponential tails, and local densities that do not assume the target overlap distribution. Under the review rules, such citations are independent support rather than circularity; their absence from the text is a completeness/verification risk for referees, not a circular reduction of the paper's main result to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. The sequence a(chi) is determined by the Airy_1 point process through a saddle equation, not by fitting to overlap data. The only external inputs are standard random matrix universality results and the cited companion estimates from [DH26].

assumptions (5)

domain assumption GOE eigenvalue edge converges to the reflected Airy_1 point process (equation (1.2)).
Standard random matrix edge universality, cited to Forrester, EYY12, and Landon-Sosoe. Used throughout Section 4 to pass from the finite spectral data to the Airy_1 limit.
standard math Airy saddle limit Xi(chi) exists and the gap asymptotics chi_k/t_k -> 1 (Proposition 1.3 and Proposition 1.4(a)).
Proposition 1.3 is cited to Landon-Sosoe Theorem 6.1; Proposition 1.4(a) is proved in Section 2.1 using those estimates. This justifies the definition of the limiting saddle function.
domain assumption Companion estimates from [DH26]: E[(X_N-1)^2]=O(N^{-1/3}), exponential tails of N^{1/3}R_{1,2}, and the local density comparison (3.9).
Proved in the unpublished companion preprint DH26, not reproduced here. These are load-bearing for Theorem 1.9, Proposition 3.1, and the final Ising transfer.
standard math Semicircle eigenvalue rigidity for GOE (equation (4.12)).
Classical result of Erdos-Yau-Yin, used in Lemma 4.3 to control inverse-gap tails in ell^2.
standard math Standard probabilistic tools: Kolmogorov extension, coarea formula, Fourier inversion, Skorokhod representation, Prokhorov's theorem.
Used in Section 2 and Section 4 to construct the infinite-dimensional conditioned Gaussian measure and to pass to limits without comment.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Overlap distribution of the critical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E7UTZKXI

@misc{pith2026260808752,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Overlap distribution of the critical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E7UTZKXI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08752}
}

abstract

We study the distribution of the two-replica overlap $R_{1,2}$ in the Ising and spherical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick models at the critical inverse temperature $\beta = 1$. Our main result shows that in both models, $R_{1,2}$ has scale $N^{-1/3}$, and the quenched distribution of $N^{1/3} R_{1,2}$ converges to an explicit random probability measure defined in terms of the reflected $\mathrm{Airy}_1$ point process. As a consequence, we characterize the limiting value of $N^{2/3} \mathbb{E} \langle R_{1,2}^2 \rangle$, answering a question of Talagrand \cite{talagrand2011mean2}. For the spherical SK model, we obtain the limit by representing the Gibbs measure as an anisotropic Gaussian on $\mathbb{R}^N$ conditioned to have norm $\sqrt{N}$, and then passing to the $\mathrm{Airy}_1$ scaling limit at the GOE spectral edge. For the Ising SK model, the proof is based on a sphere-to-cube comparison principle showing that the quenched distributions of $N^{1/3} R_{1,2}$ under the spherical and Ising Gibbs measures asymptotically coincide. This paper is a companion to \cite{du2026fluctuations}, where we introduced a related comparison principle to identify the limiting fluctuations of the SK free energy. Most of the arguments in this paper were generated using GPT-5.6 Pro, with the aim of exploring further consequences of the ideas developed in that work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[1]

and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , journal=

Johnstone, Iain M. and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , journal=. An edge
[2]

Aspelmeier, Timo , title=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=
[3]

Parisi, Giorgio and Rizzo, Tommaso , title=. Phys. Rev. B , volume=
[4]

ALEA Lat

Chen, Wei-Kuo and Lam, Wai-Kit , title=. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , volume=
[5]

and Kang, Taegu , title=

Dey, Partha S. and Kang, Taegu , title=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05636 , year=

arXiv
[6]

Landon, Benjamin , title=. J. Math. Phys. , volume=
[7]

and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , title=

Johnstone, Iain M. and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , title=. J. Stat. Phys. , volume=
[8]

Free energy fluctuations of the bipartite spherical

Collins. Free energy fluctuations of the bipartite spherical. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , volume=

work page

Show all 61 references

[9]

Order of fluctuations of the free energy in the positive semi-definite

Collins. Order of fluctuations of the free energy in the positive semi-definite. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11732 , year=

arXiv
[10]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28702 , year=

Prodromidis, Kyprianos-Iason and Sly, Allan , title=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28702 , year=
[11]

and Ruelle, David , title =

Aizenman, Michael and Lebowitz, Joel L. and Ruelle, David , title =. Comm. Math. Phys. , volume =
[12]

Comets, Francis and Neveu, Jacques , title =. Comm. Math. Phys. , volume =
[13]

Talagrand, Michel , title =
[14]

Talagrand, Michel , title =. Ann. Math. , volume =
[15]

Panchenko, Dmitry , title =
[16]

Baik, Jinho and Lee, Ji Oon , title =. J. Stat. Phys. , volume =
[17]

Chatterjee, Sourav , title =
[18]

arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.3381 , year =

Chatterjee, Sourav , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.3381 , year =

arXiv
[19]

Sherrington, David and Kirkpatrick, Scott , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =
[20]

Parisi, Giorgio , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =
[21]

Panchenko, Dmitry , title =. Ann. Math. , volume =
[22]

Spin Glass Theory and Beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications , publisher =

M. Spin Glass Theory and Beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications , publisher =
[23]

Ruelle, David , title =. Comm. Math. Phys. , volume =
[24]

General properties of overlap probability distributions in disordered spin systems

Ghirlanda, Stefano and Guerra, Francesco , journal=. General properties of overlap probability distributions in disordered spin systems
[25]

, title =

Aizenman, Michael and Sims, Robert and Starr, Shannon L. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =
[26]

Guerra, Francesco , title =. Comm. Math. Phys. , volume =
[27]

Crisanti, Andrea and Sommers, H-J , title =. Zeit. Phys. B , volume =
[28]

Talagrand, Michel , title =. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields , volume =
[29]

and Wu, Qiang , journal=

Dey, Partha S. and Wu, Qiang , journal=. Fluctuation results for multi-species
[30]

Free energy of bipartite spherical

Baik, Jinho and Lee, Ji Oon , journal=. Free energy of bipartite spherical
[31]

and Wormald, Nicholas C

Robinson, Robert W. and Wormald, Nicholas C. , journal=. Almost all cubic graphs are
[32]

and Wormald, Nicholas C

Robinson, Robert W. and Wormald, Nicholas C. , journal=. Almost all regular graphs are
[33]

On the hardness of sampling independent sets beyond the tree threshold , author=. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields , volume=
[34]

On the chromatic number of random d -regular graphs , author=. Adv. Math. , volume=
[35]

Proof of the contiguity conjecture and lognormal limit for the symmetric perceptron , author=. Proc. 62nd FOCS , pages=
[36]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15616 , year=

On zeros and algorithms for disordered systems: mean-field spin glasses , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15616 , year=
[37]

Random regular graphs: asymptotic distributions and contiguity , author=. Combin. Probab. Comp. , volume=
[38]

Perfect matchings in random r -regular, s -uniform hypergraphs , author=. Combin. Probab. Comp. , volume=
[39]

Fluctuations of the

Coja. Fluctuations of the. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08590 , year=
[40]

Fabian, Christian and Loick, Philipp , journal=. The
[41]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08351 , year=

A gaussian convexity for logarithmic moment generating functions with applications in spin glasses , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08351 , year=

arXiv
[42]

Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices , journal =

Baik, Jinho and Ben. Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices , journal =
[43]

The largest eigenvalue of small rank perturbations of

P. The largest eigenvalue of small rank perturbations of. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields , volume =
[44]

Limits of spiked random matrices

Bloemendal, Alex and Vir. Limits of spiked random matrices. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields , volume =
[45]

Limits of spiked random matrices

Bloemendal, Alex and Vir. Limits of spiked random matrices. Ann. Probab. , volume =
[46]

Rigidity of Eigenvalues of Generalized

Erd. Rigidity of Eigenvalues of Generalized. Adv. Math. , volume =
[47]

The order of free energy fluctuations in the critical

Schertzer, Adrien , journal =. The order of free energy fluctuations in the critical
[48]

2010 , publisher=

An Introduction to Random Matrices , author=. 2010 , publisher=

2010
[49]

Fluctuations of the overlap at low temperature in the 2 -spin spherical

Landon, Benjamin and Sosoe, Philippe , journal=. Fluctuations of the overlap at low temperature in the 2 -spin spherical
[50]

Analysis on Symmetric Cones , series =

Jacques Faraut and Adam Kor. Analysis on Symmetric Cones , series =. 1994 , isbn =

1994
[51]

David Vernon Widder , title =
[52]

Fluctuations of the

Du, Hang and Huang, Brice , journal=. Fluctuations of the
[53]

Moderate Deviations for Gaussian Maxima and an Entropy Proof of Critical

Chen, Yiming , journal=. Moderate Deviations for Gaussian Maxima and an Entropy Proof of Critical
[54]

2010 , publisher=

Log-Gases and Random Matrices , author=. 2010 , publisher=

2010
[55]

Central limit theorem near the critical temperature for the overlap in the 2 -spin spherical

Nguyen, Vu Lan and Sosoe, Philippe , journal=. Central limit theorem near the critical temperature for the overlap in the 2 -spin spherical
[56]

Ferromagnetic to Paramagnetic Transition in Spherical Spin Glass , author=. J. Stat. Phys. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

2018
[57]

Optimal Transport: Old and New , series =

C. Optimal Transport: Old and New , series =
[58]

Spherical model of a spin-glass , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=
[59]

The Thermodynamic Limit in Mean Field Spin Glass Models , author=. Comm. Math. Phys. , volume=
[60]

Cavity method in the spherical

Panchenko, Dmitry , journal=. Cavity method in the spherical
[61]

Central limit theorem for fluctuations in the high temperature region of the

Guerra, Francesco and Toninelli, Fabio Lucio , journal=. Central limit theorem for fluctuations in the high temperature region of the

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , journal=

Johnstone, Iain M. and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , journal=. An edge

[2] [2]

Aspelmeier, Timo , title=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=

[3] [3]

Parisi, Giorgio and Rizzo, Tommaso , title=. Phys. Rev. B , volume=

[4] [4]

ALEA Lat

Chen, Wei-Kuo and Lam, Wai-Kit , title=. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , volume=

[5] [5]

and Kang, Taegu , title=

Dey, Partha S. and Kang, Taegu , title=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05636 , year=

arXiv

[6] [6]

Landon, Benjamin , title=. J. Math. Phys. , volume=

[7] [7]

and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , title=

Johnstone, Iain M. and Klochkov, Yegor and Onatski, Alexei and Pavlyshyn, Damian , title=. J. Stat. Phys. , volume=

[8] [8]

Free energy fluctuations of the bipartite spherical

Collins. Free energy fluctuations of the bipartite spherical. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , volume=

work page